Home Blog Page 6865

Congress gives up MP? Within an hour, leaders start coming up with ‘EVM hacked’ theory

0

Even as the voting is underway in Madhya Pradesh, where BJP’s Shivraj Singh Chouhan is fighting for his 4th term as chief minister, Congress stalwarts seem to have given up already. At 9:38 am Congress leader Digvijaya Singh tweeted that EVMs are malfunctioning in constituencies where Congress is strong.


He urged the Congress polling agents to keep track of EVMs and to check by doing mock-voting to see if EVMs are working properly, hinting at the ‘EVM hacking’ theory.


Five minutes later, at 9:44 am, Congress leader Kamal Nath, too, tried to float a conspiracy theory with regard to EVMs malfunctioning.


Congress’ Chief Conspiracy Officier (unofficial) Digvijaya Singh had earlier, too, in a series of tweets tried to prove that EVMs can be ‘tampered’ at ‘coding stage’ while writing the software. That they could be ‘pre-tampered’. This could also be the reason he urged the Congress workers to ‘mock-vote’ about 50 times to check if the person you vote for and the person who gets your vote are same.

Politicians and many Congress-friendly journalists regularly float the ‘EVMs are hacked’ theory during elections or if BJP wins any elections. During the Gujarat Assembly Elections last year, journalist Sagarika Ghose had spread rumours that EVMs are getting hacked via Bluetooth. Pro-AAP blog Janta Ka Reporter, too, which is famous for spreading fake news, misquoted Chief Election Officer in a bid to malign the EVMs. Aam Aadmi Party MLA ‘demonstrated’ EVM hacking on a toy EVM which could be bought off the Internet.

The EVM obsession is so high that recently while trying to ‘protect’ EVMs in Chhattisgarh, a Congress worker died of cold after being outdoors for hours.

With EVM malfunctiong, hacking, tampering theories already making rounds, especially by Congress leaders, one wonders if they are building ground for ‘moral victory’ in case the results on 11th December are not in their favour.

Congress and BJP fight it out in Mizoram today, but earlier this year, they had formed an alliance for an autonomous body

Mizoram goes to poll today to elect its next government. The main contest is expected between incumbent Congress and Mizo National Front (MNF), but Zoram People’s Movement (ZPM) and BJP are also important players in the elections. None of these parties has any pre-poll alliance. Unlike other states in North East where BJP had formed pre-poll alliances and won elections, BJP has decided to go alone in Mizoram.

Although Congress won 34 out of 40 seats in 2013 elections, this time it is expected to come down substantially, due to anti-incumbency factor and the cascading effect of declining fortune of the Congress party at the national level. Chief Minister Lal Thanhawla has said that Congress is open form post-poll alliance with like-minded parties excluding BJP and MNF.

On the other hand, North-East Democratic Alliance (NEDA) convenor Himanta Biswa Sarma has made a very significant comment by saying that BJP has worked with all other three parties in the state and there is nothing to hide in that. According to Sarma, Mizoram Congress is a different entity separate from the Congress party, and since the time of Indira Gandhi, Mizoram Congress is considered different from All India Congress Committee (AICC).

This may like a strange comment coming from the Congress leader turned staunch critic of Rahul Gandhi, but politics in northeastern states is different from the national level. In the region, politics is more personality driven rather than party driven. In the states of the northeast, it is regular to merge an entire party unit into another one, and parties form alliances which seems impossible, like a BJP-Congress alliance.

There is a BJP-Congress alliance in the state, although not for the assembly election, its there for an autonomous council. In April this year, the election for the 20 seats of Chakma Autonomous District Council (CADC) took place in the state. In the election, MNF won eight seats, Congress won six seats and BJP won five seats. Thus, no party won a majority to form the council, and an alliance was necessary between any two parties. And in an unusual political equation formed by local leaders, the elected council members of Congress and BJP came together. BJP leader Santi Jiban Chakma became the chief executive member (CEM) of the council, with the support of the Congress councillors.

Mizoram is a Christian majority state with Church having a considerable influence in politics of the state. The Church has openly taken an anti-BJP stand in the elections, even expelling its members for joining BJP. That is the reason other parties are not willing to form any pre-poll alliance in the state. Mizo National Front is a member of NDA in the national level, but even they don’t want to be seen with BJP in the state.

BJP is in power in six of the seven states in the northeast, Mizoram being the exception. There are four BJP chief ministers in the region, in Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur and Tripura, while BJP is part of the ruling coalition in Nagaland and Meghalaya. Will BJP be able to come to power in Mizoram, will they form an alliance with any party after the elections, we will know after December 11.

Supreme Court refuses to quash FIR against activist Nandini Sundar in murder case, asks Chhatishgarh government to submit report

0

Today the Supreme Court of India refused to remove the name of activist and Delhi University professor Nandini Sundar from the FIR filed in a murder case. The court also asked the Chattisgarh government to submit the status of the investigation against activist and others in the case. The activist had filed a plea in the Supreme Court requesting to remove her name from the FIR, alleging that government is sitting on the case and the investigation is not progressing.

In 2016, Nandini and Sundar and some other activists along with Maoists were booked on the charge of murder of a tribal person in Sukma district in Chhatisgarh. On 4th November 2016, Naxal terrorists had killed Shamnath Baghel, who was leading protests against the Naxals. Before his murder, Baghel had lodged a complaint with police against Nandini Sundar, JNU Professor Archana Prasad and some other persons for allegedly inciting innocent tribals against the government and seeking their support for Maoists.

After the murder of Baghel, his wife had complained that Sundar and others went to the village after Baghel’s complaint and threatened the villagers not to oppose the Maoists. Nandini Sundar had used the fake name Richa Keshav while going to the village. Baghel’s wife also stated that he was receiving threats from Maoists since he had complained against Nandini and others, saying they will punish Baghel if do not listen to Nandini and others.

After this development, Chhatisgarh police had named Nandini Sundar and others in the FIR filed in the murder case of Shamnath Baghel. Nandini Sundar had filed a petition in the Supreme Court asking to remove her name for FIR in the case. She alleged in the court that the government has done nothing in the case against her in past two years. She said police have not questioned her even once in these two years.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who was appearing for Chhatisgarh government, said police have made progress in the case and recorded statements of several persons. He opposed the plea of Nandini, saying progress has been made in the case.

To this, the court asked the government to file a reply within 3 weeks. The state government was asked to file an affidavit explaining why no action was taken in last two weeks, and what steps are planned in immediate future.

But the court refused to accept the plea at this moment, saying “eliminating names from the FIR virtually means quashing of FIR and FIR cannot be quashed exparte without hearing the other side”.

The bench was highly critical of Chhatisgarh government for the delay in the probe. The court said that government “cannot keep the sword of FIR pending against anyone for indefinite period”, asking them to file a report on the same.

Nandini Sundar and others have been booked under section 120B (criminal conspiracy), 302 (murder), 147 (punishment for rioting), 148 and 149 of IPC in the murder case.

#MeToo: Lara Dutta confessed that Sajid Khan was rude and vulgar on sets of ‘Housefull’: Mahesh Bhupathi

0

The ace tennis player Mahesh Bhupathi has come forward to give his take on the sexual harassment allegations levelled against filmmaker Sajid Khan.

Bhupathi who was in conversation with journalist Barkha Dutt at ‘We The Women’ event on Sunday night, revealed that his actor wife Lara Dutta had complained to him that her co-star was being subjected to “rude, vulgar” behaviour on the sets of Housefull by director Sajid Khan.

Earlier, grave charges had surfaced against Sajid Khan, the director of sexually harassing women and preying on them. A freelance Bollywood journalist had taken to Twitter to narrate her ordeal. Actor Akshay Kumar had also announced on Twitter then that he was cancelling the shooting for the movie Housefull 4 after sexual harassment allegations surfaced against director Sajid Khan. Sajid’s sister, Farah Khan, actor-director Farhan Akhtar, had then castigated the director for his conduct.

Bhupathi, talking to the moderator said, “When we were dating she was shooting for ‘Housefull’ and we were in London at that time. She would come home and her closest friend was her hairdresser and they both would be complaining about how one of her co-stars was being treated by the director. Rude, vulgar. “I told her, ‘You guys are all complicit. All the four of you, who were in the film, were listening to what he was saying and not telling him it’s not ok. So, at some level you guys are complicit and she agreed.”

The romantic comedy directed by Sajid Khan, which released in 2010, featured Akshay Kumar, Riteish Deshmukh, Arjun Rampal, Deepika Padukone, Malaika Arora, Jiah Khan and along with Miss Universe 2000 and model turned actor Lara Dutta.

Bhupathi recalled how he had told Lara that at some level all the actors on set were complicit in enabling Sajid’s behaviour by keeping quiet and not voicing their displeasure. Lara had then agreed.

To which Barkha countered him by saying it would have been difficult to take on Sajid as people’s work depended on him and that is a coercive environment which makes it difficult for women, to speak up as they would lose work.

It is important to note here, that earlier we had reported how an ex-woman employee, Nikita Arora, working for NDTV, had voiced that how she had written about her sexual harassment experience to the then group editor of the channel, Barkha Dutt, who chose not to respond to her complaints.

Three days after, Dutt replied that Convergence department was not under her and since 2014 she has been a consultant with NDTV. She said she neither had any jurisdiction nor she knew who Nikita was talking about. Nikita then said that she had written to Dutt with confidence that she would be heard but she wasn’t.

However, Bhupathi responding to Barkha Dutt’s opinion said that he understands the film fraternity functions in a different way but it does not justify one brushing off something as serious as indecent behaviour.

“I come from the sports industry where we think differently. In sports, the cream always rises to the top. If you’re good at what you do, you are going to win matches and get results.

“Obviously the film industry is different. If the fraternity decides to ostracise you, you don’t get work. But I don’t think it’s good enough reason to let things like these slide,” he said.

Earlier too Mahesh Bhupathi had come out to support former Miss India and actor Niharika Singh, who had come forward with her own account of ‘Me Too’ and had documented the harassment and abuse she endured during her struggles in the film industry in a lengthy post on social media. The former Miss India’s account also mentions Sajid Khan who she claims told her that she should commit suicide.

Mahesh Bhupathi had then in his post urged people to stop engaging with #MeToo accused and had extended his support to Niharika Singh.

As the ‘MeToo Movement’ had caught momentum several prominent personalities like stand up comedians, journalists, cinema stars and politicians names surfaced. Union minister M J Akbar, actors like Alok Nath, Rajat Kapoor, Varun Grover and comedians like Tanmay Bhat and Gursimran Khamba, co-founders of All India Bakchod were all accused of sexual misconduct. Notable filmmakers like Vikas Bahl, Sajid Khan and Journalists like Vinod Dua and Sidharth Bhatia of The Wire, Prashant Jha of the Hindustan Times have been accused.

Journalist Vidya Krishnan has accused India Today Executive Editor and her former colleague Gaurav Sawant of having sexually harassed her in 2003. Sawant has refuted the claims and has sent a legal notice to the publication, the author as well as to Krishnan. The senior journalist who used to work at India Today, TS Sudhir was also amongst the long list of names that surfaced during the ‘#MeToo wave’.

The movie Housefull was released in the year 2000, which had four leading actresses, Lara Dutta, Deepika Padukone, Malaika Arora, Jiah Khan. Bhupathi did not mention which co-star of Lara Dutta was targetted by Sajid Khan. Housefull was the last movie of Jiah Khan before her mysterious suicide in 2013.

Engineering not for you, Punjab and Haryana HC tells student who could not clear 17 compartments in 9 years

0

Punjab and Haryana High Court on Tuesday rejected a mercy petition filed by a BTech student of National Institute of Technology (NIT), Kurukshetra to allow him one more attempt to clear his compartments.

The petitioner was awarded 17 compartments during four years of the degree course and was given a time period of another four years to reappear and clear the exams that he failed in. But the petitioner could not clear the exam in the given time period.

The petitioner requested the court to grant him another attempt to clear all the 17 compartments. The court dismissed his petition saying that it had no sympathy for people like him who waste nation’s resources.

“When you could not pass an engineering degree in nine years how can you clear 17 compartments in one attempt. It is better to choose some other career, but not engineering,” the court commented.

Replying to the petitioner seeking mercy, the court sought mercy instead, saying  ‘you have mercy on this court and do not waste its valuable time and have mercy on this country and do not become an engineer’. The chief justice suggested that the petitioner can take up some other profession like he can try to become a lawyer, but he should forget about engineering.

Indian women’s cricket team captain Mithali Raj accuses coach Ramesh Powar and CoA member Diana Edulji of bias

0

Indian women’s cricket team captain in the ODI and test format, Mithali Raj, has accused BCCI (Board of Cricket Control for India) Committee of Administrators (CoA) member Diana Edulji and coach Ramesh Powar of being biased against her and trying to destroy her. In an email written to the BCCI she has said that removing her from the World T20 semi-final against England reduced her to tears and left her deflated in her career spanning over two decades.

She adds that her issues with coach Powar started as soon as they landed in West Indies, where she found his behaviour unfair and discriminatory. Mithali says that he would walk away if she is sitting anywhere nearby, or watch the nets while others are playing but he would walk away when Mithali is playing. She said that he was ignoring her presence and she felt humiliated. She points out that when she broached the topic in front of the manager, Powar accepted that he was wrong in his behaviour. However, she says that following the meeting with the manager, Powar’s behaviour worsened.

Mithali then expressed shock at being kept out of the team in the game against Australia. Powar even instructed her not to step out of the dressing room to watch the team play, she says. She says that even though she let her side known to Diana Edulji, a former Indian team captain herself, Edulji defended her team’s decision to drop her by taking advantage of the position of power she holds.

Controversy erupted after Mithali was omitted from the playing eleven against England and intensified after India lost the title. “I think too much is being made out of it. The management (captain Harmanpreet Kaur, coach Ramesh Powar, vice-captain Smriti Mandhana and selector Sudha Shah) made the decision of not changing a winning combination and that backfired. If India had won the game, I am sure nobody would have questioned their decision,” Edulji had said.

“Her brazen support in the press with regard to the decision of my benching in the semi-final of the T20 World Cup has left me deeply distressed, more because she knows the real facts having spoken to me,” Mithali wrote in her letter.

Thanks to Subhagya scheme, India breaches 180GW of peak power demand

India has crossed the benchmark of 180 gigawatt (GW) in peak power demand, which was 9.8% higher than the highest level recorded in Financial Year 2018. It is evident of spurting industrial activity and has reversed the trends in energy demand and power sector. Peak power demand increase was just 2.6% between FY15 and FY18.

The electricity consumption in the country in October was 115.6 billion units. Which was 14% higher than last year. On the other hand, the year-on-year rise in electricity requirement in October 2017 was only meagre 3%.

Telangana was at number one in energy consumption increase, with 42% more consumption. It was followed by Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra.

These indices are a testimony of the level of the success government scheme, Saubhagya has achieved.  Apart from a pick-up in industrial production, a reduction in the average duration of power cuts also played a role. The average duration of power cuts was 7 hours and 8 minutes in October 2018, 1 hour 5 minutes shorter than October 2017.

The report also says that the peak increase in demand is structured and not seasonal. It is evident from past year increase percentage.

More than 2 crore households have been connected under the Saubhagya scheme since its launch in October 2017. The project was announced in September 2017 by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who said that the aim was to complete the electrification process by December 2018.

India currently depends majorly on coal for its electricity production. On the other note, India is also making robust infrastructure required to produce renewable and clean energy. India’s installed power generating capacity stood at 346 GW in June 2018, with the renewable contribution of 71 GW.

With increased investments and clean energy installations, as well as the world’s largest renewables auction market, India ranks 2nd after Chile in the 2018 Climatescope report by energy researcher BloombergNEF. India is the second-largest destination for attracting clean energy investments.

Leftists to protest against Modi government under the garb of ‘Farmer rights’ in Kisan Mukti March

As per reports, thousands of farmers shall march to the capital this week in a Kisan Mukti March demanding a minimum support price for their crops and freedom from debt. The march to be held on November 29 and 30 is being organized by the All India Kisan Sangharsh Coordination Committee (AIKSCC).

Mainstream media reports conveniently fail to mention the political affiliation of the AIKSSC. One glimpse at their website, however, makes it abundantly clear that they are merely a front for communist politics.

Even the ‘about us’ section of AIKSCC’s website fails to mention their political leanings. It says, “All India Kisan Sangharsh Coordination Committee (AIKSCC) was formed in late June 2017, in response to the spontaneous struggles of farmers in different states like Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh, for debt relief and remunerative prices. This is the first such broad-based alliance in India at the national level, for securing farmers’ rights on two fronts to begin with.”

Then a separate section lists its constituent organizations. It’s these constituent organizations that make their political affiliation abundantly clear. Jai Kisan Andolan (JKA) and former AAP politician Yogendra Yadav’s Swaraj Abhiyan are two of them. It’s unclear why the two have been listed as different entities when the former is an initiative of the latter. The All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS) is another communist frontal organization affiliated to attached to communist political parties. The All India Kisan Mazdoor Sabha (AIKMS) is associated with the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist).

Akhil Gogoi’s Krishak Mukti Sangram Samiti (KMSS) is also a member organization of the AIKSCC. The All India Kisan Mahasabha (AIKM), All India Khet Mazdoor Kisan Sabha (AIKMKS), AIKS (Canning Street) are Left organizations. The Swabhimani Shetkari Sangathana (SSS) was open to allying with the Shiv Sena if it pulled out of the alliance with the BJP in Maharashtra. The AIKSCC has over a hundred constituent members and a good portion of them appear to be directly associated with the Left.

The working group of the AIKSCC, which has 20 members, provides a clearer picture of its political leanings. Akhil Gogoi, Dr Ashish Mittal of AIKMS, Atul Kumar Anjaan of AIKS, who is also a prominent leader of the CPI, Raja Ram Singh of AIKM, Hannan Nollah from AKIS (Canning Street) all align towards the Left. Avik Saha and Yogendra Yadav from Swaraj Abhiyan also have left political leanings although they aren’t associated with any communist parties. Medha Patkar from the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), a vocal opponent of Prime Minister and founder of the Narmada Bachao Andolan, is also a member of the working group of AIKSCC. Raju Shetti is from SSS, another anti-BJP front. Thus we have 9 of the 20 members with very prominent anti-Modi political leanings. And among those 9, apart from the SSS, the rest have very strong Leftist political inclinations. There are several others who are related to the Left too.

The CPIM’s role in protests in Maharashtra is also well known. As per Financial Express, the Kisan March saw “thousands of protesting farmers led by CPI(M)-affiliated Akhil Bharatiya Kisan Sabha (AIKS) walked 180 km for six days to reach Mumbai to press for their demands.”

Interestingly, an October 15 report on CPIM’s website mentions that “Fresh round of kisan agitational movements are in the offing”. Therefore, the protests to be held on November 29 and 30 appear clearly to be protests by leftists.

Every political party has the right to protest on behalf of an aggrieved community. That is the essence of democratic politics. But to pretend as if the protests are not motivated by politics is dishonest. The fact that the mainstream media allows the Left to get away by proclaiming it to be “Farmers’ protests” instead of calling it “Left protests for farmers’ rights” as it quite clearly it only goes on to show that the media is party to the Left agenda.

In the same manner, the media allows Leftists to get away with dishonesty by labelling Pride Marches as events organized by the LGBT community when in reality, those are events are organized by leftists to further their own political agenda.

Tweets by Scientist and Columnist Anand Ranganathan critical of judiciary blocked from being read in India

Twitter is fast becoming a platform where ideological battles are fought. Several people take to the platform to express their thoughts on various subjects that impact national and international issues. Scientist and columnist Anand Ranganathan too, much like everyone else, uses the platform to express his views on politics, judiciary, society, etc.

A free speech absolutist, while criticising the use of left “activist” Rehana Fatima today, Anand Ranganathan got a rude shock. He realised that some of his tweets in the Twitter thread where he had criticised the use of draconian laws to stifle free speech, certain tweets of his were missing.

It turns out that certain tweets of his were withheld in India. The reason that is being displayed to users reads “This tweet from @ARanganathan71 has been withheld in India in response to a legal demand”.

Livid, Anand Ranganathan tweeted questioning Twitter India about the reasons his tweets were withheld.


The two tweets which have been withheld evidently in response to legal demand were criticising the contempt of court notices that were earlier served to S Gurumurthy and Vivek Agnihotri.

According to the Twitter help page, a user would see such a message if the tweet was withheld vide a legal demand, like a court order.

The Twitter rules also specify that Twitter would inform the affected user of their content being withheld unless they are prohibited to do so vide a court order under seal.

For now, it would seem like the tweets against the contempt of court notices served to S Gurumurthy and Vivek Agnihotri was withheld vide the instructions of the honourable court.

Anand Ranganathan has tweeted again and it’s to be seen if the tweet will be withheld again. We’d update this article without prejudice to any party when there’s a new development in the case.

Telangana: Congress candidate against KCR attempts suicide in the middle of police raid at his home, booked

Amidst the Telangana assembly election pressure, it was reported that Congress candidate for Gajwel assembly constituency, Vanteru Pratap Reddy allegedly made a futile self-immolation attempt to prevent the police from conducting a search in his house at Kompally on the outskirts of Hyderabad late on Monday night.

Vanteru Pratap Reddy, who is contesting against Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) president and chief minister, K Chandrasekhar Rao, was later arrested for obstructing the police from discharging their duties.

The police informed that a case of attempted suicide, obstructing public servants in discharge of their duty and other charges under relevant sections have been registered against Reddy.

According to Cyberabad Police, the Election Commission had received a complaint from TRS leaders earlier in the day that Reddy and his followers were distributing money to people at his Kompally residence. A flying squad comprising election officials along with a team led by Balanagar deputy commissioner of police, Padmaja, reached Reddy’s house late on Monday to conduct searches in his house following an instruction from the poll body.

Reddy, along with his family members and supporters reportedly resisted the team’s entry, alleging that the police was trying to intimidate him and his workers in the name of such search operations.

While the team was executing the task, Reddy immediately doused himself with petrol and tried to set himself on fire, however, the police managed to thwart the attempt.

Though nothing substantial was found during the search, the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Balanagar Zone) PV Padmaja told PTI that “Reddy along with his supporters misbehaved with the officials on duty and also with police.”

Meanwhile Reddy blamed the TRS supremo claiming that because he was a strong contender, the Chief Minister was instigating the police to harass him mentally and physically.

Supporters of the Congress candidate gathered near his house and started shouting slogans against the TRS government and the chief minister.

As the situation turned tense, police took Reddy into custody and warned the party workers against coming in there way while they were performing their duty. After an intense search for over an hour, the police left saying they did not find any money or valuables at the house.

A day before this incident Reddy held a hunger strike in front of the office of the Election Returning Officer in Gajwel. He had alleged that his phones were being tapped and that his supporters were being harassed by the TRS leaders.

Gajwel Police arrested him and took him away though they let him off later. But Reddy got himself admitted to a corporate hospital in Secunderabad complaining of low blood pressure.

Telangana assembly elections are scheduled to be held on December 7.