Home Blog Page 6885

Jack Dorsey poses with a placard that declares ‘Smash Brahminical Patriarchy’, Netizens furious

CEO of Twitter, Jack Dorsey, appeared to endorse a Far-Left Hinduphobic slogan during his visit to India. A photo was shared on Twitter by journalist Anna MM Vetticad where Jack could be seen holding a placard that said “Smash Brahminical Patriarchy!”


Such slogans are part of ‘Third Wave Intersectional Feminism’ which has been imported to India by feminists here after taking inspiration from the Postmodernist Left in the West. In the West, the ‘White Patriarchy’ is blamed for every evil in society. Indian Leftists, unable to produce a single original thought due to an extreme lack of creativity, has applied the idea to the Indian context and has replaced White with Brahminical.

Netizens were extremely displeased with Jack’s open endorsement of hate against an Indian community.


People also noticed the presence of Barkha Dutt in the photo and remembered her justification of the genocide of Pandits in Kashmir by Islamic terrorists.


People also remarked that ‘Brahminical’ is often used as a code-word to attack Hinduism just as ‘Zionists’ is used by anti-Semites to spread hatred against Jews.


One wonders whether Jack Dorsey would feel comfortable with holding a placard that says “Smash White Patriarchy” in the United States. And if he wouldn’t, why was he comfortable with holding a placard that demonizes Brahmins in India?

It is indeed shameful that the CEO of a global tech giant used his authority to spread hate against a peaceful community. Twitter’s Indian Legal head, Vijaya Gadde, was also present on the occasion as claimed by the journalist in her tweet. Even if Jack wasn’t aware of the message he was endorsing, Vijaya surely was and the fact that she didn’t see any problem with it goes on to show the extremely biased nature of the platform.

Gujarat government announces aid of Rs 6,400 crore for 96 rain-deficient talukas

The Gujarat government has decided to provide a special package of ₹1,300 crore for farmers of 45 more talukas of 16 districts that have received rainfall between 250-400 mm this monsoon.

Earlier, the BJP government in the state had declared 51 talukas, comprising 3,291 villages, as scarcity-hit due to less than 250 mm rainfall about a month ago. A relief package of ₹5,100 crore was announced for those talukas. With the current announcement, the government has announced a total package of ₹6,400 crore for 96 talukas.

Out of the 45 talukas, 14 talukas which received between 250-300 mm rainfall will get ₹6,300 per hectare assistance, while 12 talukas which got 300-350 mm rainfall will be given ₹5,800 per hectare assistance. And farmers in the remaining 19 talukas that got 350-400 mm rainfall will get ₹4,300 per hectare assistance.

According to Deputy Chief Minister Nitin Patel, “In a meeting chaired by Chief Minister Vijay Rupani on Saturday, it was decided to extend the aid to 45 more talukas of 16 districts that have received between 250-400 mm rainfall. The state government will be providing a special package of ₹1,300 crore to these talukas… For the 51 talukas that were earlier declared as rain-deficient, about ₹5,100 crore will be spent. But if the special package is taken into consideration and the cost of providing 10-hour power supply and fodder to these areas, then we will be spending over ₹6,500 crore in 96 talukas of the state.”

A sub-committee was formed to look into the hardship faced by farmers, and took the decision to include more talukas for financial assistance due to low rainfalls. The financial aid will be provided for a maximum of 2 hectares only. Framers having more than 2 hectares can avail of the aid for 2 hectares.

Patel also told that the cost of ₹1,300 crore of the special package will be fully born by the state government, while the Centre would providing ₹5,100 crore that will be spent on 51 “scarcity-hit” talukas.

Destined to fail: BBC’s ‘Fake News’ research relied on sources with a political bias and one with a Congress connection

We have published a series of articles on the BBC’s shoddy research where we have demonstrated that the researchers adopted inappropriate research methods to reach fantastical conclusions in the BBC fake news research paper.

Among other things, BBC’s research relied on Leftist propaganda website AltNews and FactChecker, an arm of IndiaSpend, which has itself been maintaining a fabricated database to portray Hindus as aggressors and Muslims as victims.

There are other discoveries that we have made that could reveal clear bias in part of the researchers.

Praveen Chakravarty, Congress and Indiaspend

For instance, Praveen Chakravarty, the head of Congress party’s data analytics department, is a founding trustee at IndiaSpend. The website of IndiaSpend, however, does not mention him as one.

Praveen Chakravarty got appointed as the head of Congress party’s data analytics department in February 2018, way before the BBC research started. Also, it is a wonder why the Indiaspend website makes no mention of Praveen Chakravarty.

Govindraj Ethiraj: Founder of Indiaspend and Boom Live

The BBC research had as its source, apart from AltNews and IndiaSpend, Boom Live and SMhoaxslayer. Now, IndiaSpend and Boom Live have a common link. They have the same founder, Govindraj Ethiraj. And Ethiraj once stated, “Most of the fake news is originating from people aligned with the BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party). People aligned with the Congress have not propagated fake news with the same frequency yet.”

The BBC research relied on two sources founded by the same person who had already reached a conclusion on who spreads more Fake News. Thus, the source BBC relied on was clearly biased from the very beginning, and their research was fated to be biased as well.

The Bias of AltNews

As for AltNews, their accomplishments have been documented comprehensively by OpIndia.com. On a particular occasion, the portal declared a journalist’s account of the ‘attack; on Umar Khalid ‘false’ without any evidence merely because it went against their narrative.

The co-founder of AltNews himself spread Fake News about OpIndia.com, wonder why that missed the BBC’s eye? The co-founder has now become notorious for spreading fake news on several occasions. We have demonstrated in an earlier report that AltNews is not a neutral platform.

What it tells us

Thus, we have at least 3 of the 4 sources relied on BBC who displayed clear political bias. One of them has links with the Congress party, another’s co-founder spread lies against OpIndia.com. Two of them share the same co-founder who had already reached the conclusions months ago that Fake News is mostly spread by BJP supporters. Under such circumstances, how on Earth did the BBC expect to reach unbiased conclusions? Or, perhaps they were chosen specifically to reach a preordained conclusion.

The BBC has been forced to apologize to the founder of The Better India for accusing the outlet of spreading Fake News. Since then, the BBC has been busy removing the research from its website, uploading it, then removing it again.

Maharashtra: Government to provide reservation to Maratha community as a socially, economically and educationally backward community

Months after facing severe protests, the Maharashtra Government has decided to provide reservations in jobs and education for the Maratha community. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis announced the same following the recommendations of State Backward Class Commission.

The Maharashtra Backward Class Commission had submitted its report a few days back declaring Maratha community as a socially, economically and educationally backward community. Following the Commission’s recommendation, the Devendra Fadnavis government on Sunday cleared the reservation for Marathas under a new, independent category called ‘Socially and Educationally Backward Class (SEBC)’.

Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis speaking to the media on Sunday said, “We have taken the decision to give Maratha community reservation under the newly created, independent category, Socially and Educationally Backward Class… There is adequate provision in the Indian Constitution to extend reservation to a community, provided its social, educational and financial backwardness is established.”

Maratha community has been classified as a special category in an attempt to avoid any legal and constitutional complications and also to distinguish between Marathas and OBCs. “Since Marathas will be considered as a separate category, there is no question of any community losing its share of quota in government education or jobs,” said Fadnavis.

Reportedly, the total reservation in Maharashtra is 52 per cent currently with 13 per cent for Scheduled Castes, 7 per cent for Scheduled Tribes, 19 per cent for Other Backward Classes, 2 per cent for Special Backward Classes, 3 per cent for Vimukta Jati, 2.5 per cent for Nomadic Tribe-B, 3.5 per cent for Nomadic Tribe-C (Dhangar) and 2 per cent for Nomadic Tribe-D (Vanjari).

The Maratha community has demanded 16 per cent reservation, which will take the total reservations to whopping 68 per cent in the state against the Supreme Court’s directive of limiting reservation to 50 per cent. The Maharashtra government has decided to create a Cabinet sub-committee to fix the quantum of reservations and implement the reservation for the special category.

Answering the media’s question regarding the Supreme Court’s directive on limiting reservations to 50 per cent, Fadnavis said, “There is no such provision for a ceiling on quota in the Indian Constitution. On the contrary, the Constitution provides for quota under extraordinary and exceptional cases, when a community’s backwardness is documentarily established.”

Pointing out at Tamil Nadu’s reservation policy, which has provided 69 per cent reservation in the state, Fadnavis said even though the policy has been challenged in the Supreme Court, it has not stayed the reservation in the state.

The politically dominant Marathas constitute 33 per cent of the state population and have been dominated the state politics for over six decades. According to the State Backward Class Commission’s report submitted on Thursday, the percentage of Marathas below the poverty line was 37.28 per cent, higher than the 25 per cent base. The percentage of those with small and marginal land-holdings among Marathas was 62.78 per cent, much higher than the base 48.25 per cent which is considered for social-economic backwardness.

The Maratha agitation demanding reservation has been on for two decades but the movement gathered steam in July 2016. Many Maratha organisations like Maratha Kranti Morcha took to the street demanding reservations in jobs and education in the state.

Rajendra Kondane, Maratha Kranti Morcha coordinator, reacting to the Cabinet’s decision said, “It is a historical decision. The Maratha reservation demand was pending for several decades. The government should now take the process forward and ensure its enforcement at the earliest, after completing the legal and constitutional process.”

Anil Mahajan, head of the OBC Kranti Parishad, however, said that they have nothing to complain about the reservation and expressed concern saying that the new reservation policy should not affect the existing reservation quotas.

Meanwhile, following reservation to Marathas in the state, many Muslim leaders and Dhangar community leaders of Maharashtra have written a letter to Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis demanding reservation in jobs and education sector for the minority community.

Karnataka: Protesting sugarcane farmers garland posters with shoes, Kumaraswamy calls farmers ‘goondas’

Hundreds of sugarcane farmers, including women, staged a protest against the state government in Mudhol, Belagavi, Karnataka, demanding an increase in minimum support price for their produce and getting their arrears released from the mill owners on Sunday.

They shouted slogans against the Karnataka government and chief minister HD Kumaraswamy. They put a garland of slippers on the banner with photos of people’s representatives including Kumaraswamy. The incident occurred at Mudhol, where farmers are expressing their anger against Kumaraswamy for not coming to help and for only thinking about loan waiver of farmers growing other crops.

The farmer leader, Siddanna Gouda, said, “In view of the production glut and falling price, the state government should ensure a minimum support price (MSP) of Rs 3,000 per tonne for sugarcane with 9.5 per cent recovery and help us get arrears for the cane supplied to mill owners last year”.

The previous Congress government had fixed Rs. 2,500 per tonne as MSP last year.

With input costs, including harvesting and transporting the cane to the mills rising steeply, Gouda said growing sugarcane was no longer remunerative, as mill owners were unwilling to pay more and settle the arrears.

Gouda angered by the Chief Minister, HD Kumaraswamy cancelling his visit to the city on Monday alleged, “We suspended on Saturday our agitation launched on November 15 for higher MSP and recovery of arrears on the assurance of Chief Minister HD Kumaraswamy that he would meet us here on Monday. But he has now backed out.”

As a mark of protest against Kumaraswamy going back on his words, about 20 farmers drove trucks laden with sugarcane into the Suvarna Vidhana Soudha, which is the state legislative and secretariat building for the region.

Kumaraswamy, referring to the protestors who barged into the legislature complex as ‘goondas’, added fuel to the fire.

Agitated farmers threatened to disrupt the upcoming winter session of the assembly, which is likely to begin by the first week of December and will take place in Belagavi.

The opposition BJP condemned the JD-S-Congress coalition government’s indifference to the plight of the sugarcane farmers in the state.

“The coalition government’s approach to farmers’ plight is reprehensible. Scores of farmers, including their womenfolk, were arrested at Belagavi for staging a protest,” said Karnataka BJP President BS Yeddyurappa in Bengaluru.

Mocking at Kumaraswamy and the JDS for claiming to be a party for farmers, by farmers and of farmers, Yeddyurappa said the former told a woman agitator that he was not responsible for what happened to them over the last four years as he became chief minister only 5 months ago. Kumaraswamy has also cast aspersions on the integrity of the farmers, which is unacceptable.

“By calling farmers ‘goondas’ (goons), Kumaraswamy has indulged in an outrageous act. This shows the contempt his party has for farmers.”

It is rather surprising that JDs all this while has used the farmer loan waiver issue as their key campaign agenda. The Congress president, Rahul Gandhi, still uses this subject constantly, to target the BJP government.  In fact, in his quest to undermine the prime minister, he had even lied and conflated the meaning of ‘loan waiver’ and ‘loan write off’. 

Ironically, the Congress-JDs coalition government, who have for all this while portrayed to be the benefactors of this section of people are facing the wrath of these farmers itself. It so seems that the air castles which were built by the coalition government will soon fall apart and their hollow pretence will soon concede.

CBI Director Alok Verma’s justification for going slow in IRCTC case: Political fallout, law and order problem

Ever since the dispute between two top officers in Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), director Alok Verma and Special Director Rakesh Asthana, came to light, the opposition, activists and a section are openly taking the side of Verma. Although both have levelled serious allegations against each other, Verma’s supporters have decided to ignore allegations against him and are trying to project him as a victim. As a part of that, left-wing propaganda website The Wire has been extensively covering Verma’s version of the events.

On 17th November, they published a report on Verma’s response to CVC, and on 18th, they published another report covering one aspect of the response in detail, and IRCTC case. Rakesh Asthana has been alleging that the CBI director was going slow in the case.

The IRCTC Hotel tendering case relates to alleged irregularities in awarding the contracts of two IRCTC hotels in Ranchi and Puri to a private company in return for a prime commercial plot in Patna. This happened in 2005-2006, when Lalu Prasad Yadav was union railway minister in UPA I government. The two hotels originally belonged to Indian Railways, which was transferred to IRCTC in 2005. At the same time, Sujata Hotels sold a plot of 3 acres worth ₹94 crore for just ₹1.47 crore to Delight Marketing Company Pvt. Ltd. In 2006, Sujata Hotels won the bid for both the hotels, after a change in bidding norms so that the company qualifies for bidding. In the year 2009, all the shares of Delight Marketing was transferred to Rabri Devi and Tejaswi Yadav, wife and younger son of Lalu Yadav, for mere ₹64 lakh.

In April this year, CBI had filed FIR in the case, after registering the case last year. In the FIR, Lalu Prasad Yadav was named as one of the accused. CBI special director Rakesh Asthana has been accusing that CBI director Alok Verma was trying to scuttle the case, in an alleged bid to protect Lalu Prasad Yadav.

Going by The Wire report on Verma’s version, it is clear that Alok Verma is actually not denying the fact that he was delaying the case. He has offered some justifications for the same, which are actually quite bizarre for a premier investigation agency like CBI. Verma says he was worried about the political fallout of the case. Now, in any high profile corruption case involving political leaders, there will be political implications. If a politician is caught in a scam, the opposition parties will gain. That is a natural side effect in such cases. CBI should concentrate on the investigation of the cases, not the political fallouts of the same.

Verma says that the case also had a “political angle”, and it was a politically sensitive case. He also justified his action saying there was a possibility of law and order problems in Bihar. He says that he feared that law and order problems could arise as a result of the agency’s searches at deputy chief minister Tejashwi Yadav’s residence and the houses of two former chief ministers Lalu Yadav and Rabri Devi.

This is one of the most bizarre justifications coming from a CBI director. Why should CBI not proceed with an investigation fearing law and order problem? CBI’s job is to do investigations and follow the due process, not worry about things not under its jurisdiction. The government, and state and central police forces are responsible for enforcing law and order, that should not be a subject CBI to worry about.

This argument raises some very serious questions. In how many other cases against powerful politicians the agency is going slow fearing violence? Was the agency threatened with violence if the investigation against Lalu Yadav and his family proceeds ahead? The justification given by Verma can also give a new tool to powerful and corrupt politicians, now they can threaten violence and law & order situation if the agency starts any probe on them.

They don’t do a damn thing for us: Trump on Pakistan

US President Donald Trump, on Sunday, took on Pakistan and said that despite being aware of Osama bin Laden’s presence in their country, they did not disclose it.


Trump said this in an interview given to Fox News Anchor Chris Wallace which aired on Sunday. “You know, living – think of this – living in Pakistan, beautifully in Pakistan in what I guess they considered a nice mansion, I don’t know, I’ve seen nicer,” he said. “But living in Pakistan right next to the military academy, everybody in Pakistan knew he was there,” Trump said, referring to the house in Abbottabad in which Laden was living. Laden was killed in the same house in 2011 by US

“And we give Pakistan USD 1.3 billion a year. … (Laden) lived in Pakistan, we’re supporting Pakistan, we’re giving them USD 1.3 billion a year — which we don’t give them any more, by the way, I ended it because they don’t do anything for us, they don’t do a damn thing for us,” he added, defending the decision of his administration ending financial aid given to Pakistan.

The US has been dissatisfied with Pakistan allowing its soil to be used for terrorist activities. I has announced a freeze on the aid at the beginning of the year, which is reported to be worth almost $2 billion. Later in the month of September, the Trump administration cancelled $300 million in military aid to Islamabad for not doing enough against terror groups active on its soil.

Maruti: The extraordinary crony capitalism under Indira Gandhi

Every kid growing up in India knows that the ‘Nehru-Gandhi’ name is associated to a lot of things. Buildings, roads, streets, parks, airports, everything…

If you want to spend anywhere between 10-15 years as a “college student”, you can always go to Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU). If you are the type who prefers to learn on his own time, there is always Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU). If you are not the bookish type and want to excel in sports, you can always dream of winning the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna award someday!

But a lot of people don’t know just how deep the Nehru-Gandhi name runs in India. This is the story of an Indian brand name that we all know about Maruti … and the dark crony capitalist history behind it.

The story begins around 1970. The Indian Government and the Indian public were beginning to think about an indigenous car. It had to be a small car, suited to Indian conditions and something that the “upper middle class” could afford to pay. Which was not a lot, after 200 years of British and 20 years of Congress rule.

For India the breakthrough was to come with the arrival of a dynamic young inventor, whose project Prime Minister Indira Gandhi described in these glowing terms:

”a delicate young man, and with whatever money and energy he has, he has modelled a car, not a posh one, but one fairly comfortable and suitable to Indian conditions …  has shown enterprise and I just could not say no to him … if he is not encouraged how can I ask other young men to take risks”

Which young man is she talking about? Her son Sanjay Gandhi of course. How could she say no to him?

Like so many great visionaries and inventors, Sanjay never went to college. But it was said that he loved cars and he had a mother who “could not say no to him.” Just like all those other visionaries we’ve heard about.

In 1970, Maruti received a license to produce 50,000 cars a year and the project began. Sanjay settled on a piece of land near Gurgaon for the factory, at which point two minor problems presented themselves. The first was that it was agricultural land. This was quickly solved. I am sure the farmers received a fair compensation for their land.

The second minor problem was that there was a military ammunition dump nearbly and there was a rule about not building anything within a kilometer of that. This problem was solved as well … by getting the military to move the ammunition dump.

Getting money for the project was no problem at all. Government contractors and traders were lining up to invest in the mission. In fact, traders came forward and paid Rs 3 lakh as deposit each to become future dealers as and when the car would be ready. Like Indira Gandhi, perhaps they too just could not say no to Sanjay.

So far, so good. But there was still the tiny matter of actually making a car that works.

After several years of waiting, Maruti built a prototype, which was sent for testing to the Vehicle Research & Development Establishment, Ahmednagar.

The prototype failed the test.

At this point, some of those people who had deposited money with Maruti wanted a refund. But there was a simple procedure to deal with such situations (see this India Today issue from 1977).

Untitled.png

That’s right. The process of ‘Deposit Wapsi’ is much more complex than Award Wapsi.

Nevertheless, the criticism was beginning to pile up and reached a crescendo in mid-1975.

Did I say mid-1975? Yes, I did. On June 25, 1975, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi declared a state of Emergency.

Everyone who ever made a great invention has faced doubters. So did Sanjay. Just that he had a much more effective way of putting those doubts to rest.

We don’t talk much about the Emergency today. But even when we do, we speak of the Emergency as a purely political exercise. We rarely talk about the financial interests that might have been involved.

Untitled.png

Here’s the key. Sanjay was only a director in Maruti, where his total financial stake was just one share he had purchased for Rs 100.

However, there was a second company called Maruti Technical Services (MTS) Pvt Limited. Let’s see who owned that:

Untitled.png

So Maruti Limited decided to appoint Maruti Technical Services (owned by the family) as a “consultant”.

Maruti Technical Services (MTS) was to receive two percent of the net sales, subject to a *minimum* of Rs 2.5 lakh per year.

Notice that MTS had a paid up capital of just Rs 2.15 lakh and the company would be making a *minimum* of Rs 2.5 lakh per year. Good return on investment, you bet.

Sanjay Gandhi may have had a fascination for cars, but his real talent lay in financial matters.

Untitled.png

Eventually, after the Janata govt came to power, the loss making Maruti Ltd. was liquidated. But this did not affect the profits that the Nehru-Gandhis earned through Maruti Technical Services.

The ‘Maruti’ that we know today was restarted in 1980 with help from Japan’s Suzuki.

Untitled.png

Even so, the dark taint of cronyism will forever cling to the name of one of India’s best known companies.

Congress leader Digvijaya Singh’s name emerges in Bhima Koregaon raids, Pune Police may question Singh

Raids carried out by Pune Police in the Bhima-Koregaon case has taken a shocking turn. Congress leader Digvijaya Singh’s phone number was reportedly mentioned in one of the letters Pune Police seized. Pune Police is likely to question the senior Congress leader in connection with their ongoing investigation in Bhima Koregaon raids case.

As per reports, Pune Police suspect that the ‘Congress leader’ referred in the letters recovered from the homes of suspected Maoists could be Digvijaya Singh. One of the letters recovered mentioned that the senior Congress leadership has promised all possible legal and financial help through the conduit ‘Jignesh’. The letter also mentioned that Congress has promised the release of political prisoners like comrade Kobad and comrade Sai (Professor GN Saibaba).

Pune Police claims that the number enlisted by the Maoists in another letter as that of a ‘friend’ belongs to former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister. Since the investigation is still on and a major part of the same is pending, Singh may be called in for questioning.

The letter dated 27th September 2017 was written by one ‘Com Prakash’ to ‘Com Surendra’ (believed to be Surendra Gadling, Nagpur-based lawyer arrested earlier this year) who claims that certain Congress leaders were willing to assist in the efforts to organise a nation-wide protest through students in the country. The contents of the letter are still under investigation.

Meanwhile, Singh has ‘dared’ the government to arrest him. According to reports, the letter also talks about funding they are allegedly getting from Congress leaders. Hence, Pune Police suspects that Congress leaders mentioned in the letters are supporting the Naxal movement.

Earlier this year, violence had broken out in the Pune district, prior to the 200th celebration of a British victory over the Peshwas. This ‘victory’ has been spun by leftist historians as a ‘victory of Dalits’, owing to the British army supposedly comprising of Dalits and other lower castes while the ruling Peshwas were Brahmins.

In August 2018, several raids were conducted against supposed Naxal sympathizers in connection with the violence at Bhima Koregaon last year and an assassination plot to murder Prime Minister Modi. Several have been arrested in the case. Earlier, Pune court had rejected the bail application of Sudha Bhardwaj, Arun Ferreira and Vernon Gonsalves and they were subsequently taken into custody.

Rajasthan: BJP MLA who said JNU sees thousands of condoms used daily, resigns, joins BJP again

Controversial BJP leader Gyan Dev Ahuja, a sitting MLA from Ramgarh, Alwar resigned from the BJP after he was denied a ticket to contest in the upcoming Rajasthan state elections. Gyandev Ahuja said that he will contest the upcoming elections as an independent candidate focusing on issues like Ram Janmabhoomi, cow protection and Hindutva.


According to the reports, Gyandev Ahuja on Sunday that he will be contesting as an independent candidate from Sanganer constituency after he was denied a ticket from the BJP. He further added that the BJP has not given any reason for dropping him from the list of candidates.

“Protesting against the dictatorial attitude of BJP, I have resigned from primary membership of the party. I will contest as an Independent on issues like Ram Janmabhoomi, cow protection, and Hindutva,” he said.

He further said that he had asked a ticket from Sanganer after the BJP decided to give Ramgarh ticket to another candidate. He, however, said that the party did not fulfil his demand and therefore decided to contest as an independent candidate.

Gyandev Ahuja is infamously known for his controversial statements in the past as he had once claimed that daily 50,000 pieces of bones, 3,000 used condoms, 500 used abortion injections, 10,000 cigarette “pieces” were found at JNU and had said that girls and boys dance naked at cultural programmes.

In the past, BJP MLA Gyan Dev Ahuja had said that cow slaughtering is a bigger crime than terrorism. Gyan Dev Ahuja had also said that cows are treated as mothers in India and any misbehaviour with them will not be tolerated.

However, the BJP was apprehensive about Gyan Dev Ahuja’s comments in the past, as the Ramgarh MLA had previously said that all political parties, including BJP, use black money in elections.

Update on 23rd November 2018: Just three days after Gyan Dev Ahuja had resigned from the party after being denied a ticket, he has rejoined the party. He had filed his nomination as an independent candidate and that too has been withdrawn by him. He has now been appointed BJP’s state vice president for Rajasthan.