Home Blog Page 6935

FIR against BJP state president in Tamil Nadu for allegedly ‘abusing’ woman who shouted slogans inside airplane

0

The Thoothukudi Magistrate Court on Thursday ordered Pudhukottai police to register a case against Tamil Nadu Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President Dr. Tamilisai Soundararajan and her party cadre, for allegedly abusing a co-passenger, Lois Sophia, who had raised slogans inside an aircraft.

According to the reports, The court has ordered the police to register a case under Sections 341, 294(b) and 506(1) under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), after Sophia’s father AA Samy had approached the court, alleging that Soundararajan and her party workers had allegedly used abusive language against his daughter and misbehaved with her.

On September 3, Sophia had allegedly created a nuisance in flight by raising anti-BJP slogans inside a Chennai-Tuticorin flight in which BJP state president Tamilsai Soundararajan was incidentally traveling. Reportedly Soundararajan had an argument with the woman after landing at the airport and had lodged a complaint against the woman with Airports Authority of India and Indigo airlines. According to DGCA circular, unruly behavior such as causing discomfort to other passengers & crew members is a punishable crime. Airport safety protocols all over the world had been made stringent after the 9/11 attacks and creating a nuisance and disruptive behavior inside an airplane often result in arrests.

Later, Soundararajan had lodged a complaint against Sofia under IPC sections 505 (statements conducing to public mischief), 290 (public nuisance) and Section 75 of the Tamil Nadu City Police Act. The judicial magistrate had sent her for judicial custody for 15 days but she was later granted bail by another local court.

Subsequently, Sofia’s father had registered a complaint with Pudhukottai police against Tamilisai and BJP cadre. After the police denied to file a case, Samy went to the court asking to register a case against Tamilisai and BJP cadre under Sections 341, 294(b) and 506(1) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act.

In his complaint, AA Samy said that Tamilisai did not say anything inside the flight and that the issue began after they reached the baggage area of the airport. Hearing the case, Thoothukudi Judicial Magistrate (III) Thamilselvi ordered Pudhukottai police to file an FIR against Tamilisai Soundararajan and her party cadre for allegedly harassing Sofia.

Bareilly Panchayat issues diktat: asks a woman to maintain marital relations with two husbands

0

A shocking incident has been reported in which the Panchayat in Richa district, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, has issued a decree according to which a woman named Arshi has been asked to maintain marital relationships with both her husbands.

According to reports, Arshi approached Bareilly police several times after the Panchayat’s decision was forced on her, but the police were unwilling to take any action. This, however, compelled her to seek help from Nida Khan, a social activist who is also the president of the Hazrat Helping Society.

The case goes back to 2012 when Arshi reportedly married her first husband Laik, a resident of Bahedi district in Bareilly. Soon after the marriage, Arshi started being tortured for dowry. Three years into the relationship, Laik divorced Arshi and threw her and their young son out of his house. A few years later she remarried in 2017. Soon after, her first husband came back to claim their child.

Arshi, wanting to seek justice approached the police but since they refused to take any action, she reached out to the district Panchayat which in turn delivered a bizarre verdict. She was asked to spend 15-15 days with both her husbands. Outraged by this decision Arshi said, “I am a woman, not an object that can be divided”.

Arshi claimed that regardless of her repeated complaints before and after the incident the police refused to take any action. She furthered that the District Senior Superintendent of police (SSP) had also directed the police to take appropriate steps but no such proceedings were initiated against the husband and subsequently against the Panchayat. However District SP, Satish Kumar refuted the claim saying that the police has not yet received any such complaints.

Meanwhile, social activist Nida Khan maintained that since the child is very young his custody should remain with the mother.

Twitter reacts as MoD spokesperson Twitter handle responds harshly to ex admiral, apologises later

Defence Spokesperson official Twitter handle was mired in controversy today morning as it responded to a tweet by a retired Navy chief, Adm. Arun Prakash.

Tweet by MOD spokesperson, now deleted

Adm. Arun Prakash was responding to a tweet where the Army Command’s insignia was seen on a civilian’s vehicle on Twitter. The person had tweeted wondering if such a thing is authorised. To that, Adm. Arun Prakash responded saying that even if misuse of such insignia is not a cognisable offence, the said person should be reprimanded.

The Ministry of Defence spokesperson’s official handle in response to Adm. Prakash’s harshly questioned the other ‘misuse’ like that of jawans in an officer’s residence, like the orderly (sahayak), where jawans are made to do menial tasks. The tweet also talked about the misuse of fauji cars for personal use like taking children to school as well as shopping trips by wives of army personnel.

While the Ministry of Defence spokesperson Twitter account soon deleted and apologised for the same.


Many Twitter users and retired armymen expressed their shock at the comment.


However, Adm. Prakash suggested a sober reflection on the aspersions cast by a civil servant on the personal conduct of service offices.


The Sahayak or orderly system in the armed forces, where jawans are used as man Fridays of officers, has been long debated.

Lance Naik Yagya Pratap Singh, who worked as a Sahayak, had alleged that he was forced to polish shoes. The Sahayak system was discontinued in the CRPF and the BSF through an order dated 6th March 2014 and demands have been raised to do away with the system in the Army too. In May this year, Army chief Bipin Rawat scrapped the sahayak system for retired generals.

No, Rahul Gandhi has not been ‘arrested’, he has been ‘detained’ after his ‘protest’ over the CBI fracas

Despite the Supreme Court of India upheld the decision of the government of India to send CBI director Alok Verma on leave till allegations against him are probed, Congress president went ahead with the planned protest demanding the restoration of Verma.

In the early morning of 24th October, the government had sent both Verma and CBI special director Rakesh Asthana on leave, as both were levelling serious allegations each other. After this, the Congress party and some leftwing activists decided to take a side in this fight inside CBI and protesting the removal of Verma from his post. Congress had planned a nation-wide protest against the government decision on 26th October, and as part of that, Rahul Gandhi took to the streets leading the march in Delhi.

The Congress party workers marched from Dayal Singh College on Lodhi Road to the CBI headquarters, where several senior leaders of the party participated. Other than Rahul Gandhi, Congress leaders Ashok Gehlot, Ahmed Patel, Motilal Vora, Veerappa Moily and Anand Sharma joined the march which stopped near the CBI headquarters. Leaders from the Trinamool Congress, Aam Aadmi Party, CPI(M) and other parties also joined the march.


Police had put up barricades ahead of the CBI offices to prevent the protesters from reaching the building, where Rahul Gandhi got on to a truck. Terming the removal of Verma as “illegal”, Ashok Gehlot demanded that the CBI director should be reinstated. “The prime minister should tender an apology to the nation for destroying the image of the premier investigating agency,” he added.


Later, Rahul Gandhi and other Congress leaders were detained by police and taken away from the protest site. However, in a bid to claim the victimhood victory, Congress leaders, banking on the fact that people might not be able to tell the difference, claimed that Rahul Gandhi has been ‘arrested’.


The difference between ‘detention’ and ‘arrest’ is essential because the rights of an individual change drastically.

In case of a person being detained, he is not formally accused of committing a crime but is simply restricted and kept in police custody on a reasonable suspicion. During the time in custody, he is questioned or investigated by the police authorities. After the police questioning, the person detained would be released.

The situation would be entirely different if a person was arrested. A person can only be arrested if he is charged for a crime and once he is arrested and has to be produced before a magistrate within the next 24 hours.

In certain situations, an initial detention may lead to an arrest.

Congress leader Randeep Singh Sirjewala tweeted that Rahul Gandhi and others have been ‘arrested’. The protesting leaders were taken to the Lodhi Colony police station in Delhi.


Rahul Gandhi’s reasons for this ‘protest’ were dubious to begin with. When the court itself has decided that the investigation is to be completed within 2 weeks, for Rahul Gandhi to disrupt civilian life and create a ruckus made no sense. Now, with Congress politicians and media playing the “arrest” card and confusing their readers about the difference between detention and arrest, it is clear that Congress’ intention is to simply grab headlines by whatever means possible.

Urban Naxal arrests : Pune Court rejects bail application of Vernon Gonsalves, Arun Ferreira and Sudha Bhardwaj

0

The Pune Sessions Court on today rejected bail plea of Vernon Gonsalves, Arun Ferreira and Sudha Bhardwaj, who were arrested in August for their alleged involvement in Elgaar Parishad and also in the Bhima Koregaon violence.

According to reports, the house arrest of all the three will be ending today. The Pune police can take them into custody and produce them in the court for additional interrogation. On Thursday, the Hyderabad High Court had extended house arrest of activist Varavara Rao by three weeks. The fifth accused, Gautam Navlakha was released from the house arrest by Delhi High Court on October 1.

Meanwhile, the defense lawyers representing the alleged ‘Urban Naxals’ have also moved a petition in the Pune court seeking an extension of house arrest for another 7 days for Vernon Gonsalves & Arun Ferreira, as their house arrest is ending today and Pune Police can now arrest them.

Earlier, the Supreme Court had declined an urgent hearing of a review petition filed by historian Romila Thapar in the case of the arrests of five ‘Urban Naxals’ for their alleged role in the Bhima Koregaon violence.

The Supreme court headed by the then Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra on September 28 had refused to interfere with arrests of these five ‘Urban Naxals’ and had extended the interim house arrest of the activists. The apex court proceedings had ruled that ‘dissenting views expressed or difference in political ideology’ had nothing to do with the case.

The Pune Police had conducted raids and arrested the five accused at the end of August. The arrested persons were accused of links with Maoists networks. The arrests were in relation to the Bhima Koregaon violence. Earlier, the Pune police had arrested Rona Wilson, Surendra Gadling, Shoma Sen, Mahesh Raut and Sudhir Dhavle in the case. The arrested persons in August raids had moved to the Supreme court and had obtained an order for house arrest instead of judicial custody.

Youth allegedly flees to Abu Dhabi to convert to Islam, radicalised after chatting with Muslim woman: Reports

0

In a case of suspected radicalisation, a youth from Mulund, Mumbai has mysteriously disappeared as reported by DNA.

The youth named Jagdish Parihar, 23, who is suspected to have been radicalised online, has flown to Abu Dhabi as revealed after a probe. According to the police, the youth had left home around 1:30 pm on Tuesday on the pretext on filling a form in Mumbai University for the last year of the B. Com course he was pursuing. He had called up his family on Thursday morning on WhatsApp and told them he was in Delhi for some business and would return home soon. However, he did not return.

According to the information given to the police by the family, Parihar called them stating on Tuesday that he was unhappy with Hinduism and wished to join Islam. He told his family that he did not wish to return home. Sensing something amiss, Parihar’s family approached the police.

The family suspects that Parihar used to chat with a Muslim woman and was indoctrinated online.

As told by a police officer, “he deleted his social media accounts and formatted his computer before leaving. Parihar’s last cellphone location was Mumbai’s international airport. After checking in with immigration authorities, we learnt that he left for Abu Dhabi on a three-month tourist visa”.

The police and the Anti-Terrorism Squad are trying to find out if Parihar’s visit to Abu Dhabi was pre-planned, or if it was sponsored by someone.

Dassault CEO Trappier demolishes every claim by Rahul Gandhi, says ‘a bit sad’ about the controversy

In an exclusive interview given to Economics Times editor Many Pubby, Dassault Aviation CEO Éric Trappier has strongly refuted the allegations made by Congress president Rahul Gandhi. He has said that the figures peddled by Rahul Gandhi regarding the deal are totally false and highly exaggerated.

When asked about the allegation that Dassault has ‘gifted’ ₹30,000 crores in offset business, Trappier replied that it is totally untrue. He informed that the Dassault Reliance Aerospace has been set up with a capital of ₹70 crores, which is a 49:51 joint venture between Dassault and Reliance. That means Dassault investment in the venture is just ₹35 crore, not ₹30,000 crore. He also informed that the capital in JV will be gradually increased as the operations expand, and the plan is to increase the capital in the project to ₹850 crore. So, the Dassault investment in the JV will be around ₹425 crore. And Reliance will also have to invest its portion of 51% in the JV.

The Dassault CEO said that the company will produce parts of business jet Falcon and hoped that maybe, one day a complete Falcon 2000 will be made at Multi-modal International Hub Airport at Nagpur (MIHAN), where DRAL is located.

When asked why Dassault described Reliance as a key partner, he replied that the JV will manufacture the Falcon, its parts and Rafale parts. As these are key products of the company, the JV needs to meet international standards. It is key because they plan to grow the JV to become a global aeronautical company.

Trappier informed that Reliance is not the Indian company they are working with and they in discussion with over 100 companies. The company has already signed up with thirty companies located at various parts of the country.

He reiterated that Dassault was under no pressure to form a JV with Reliance and it was entirely their own decision. He also reminded that the company had formed a JV with (Mukesh Ambani’s) Reliance in 2011-12 itself. Significantly, he said that as Dassault is a family owned company they feel comfortable with another family-owned company like Reliance.

He stressed that according to Defence Procurement Policy the choice of offset partner belongs to the contractor. He said, “when I choose a partner it becomes my responsibility to fulfil the obligations, to quality standards and timing. I made the choice.”

Trappier also rubbished the allegations that India was paying more for 36 Rafale jets than it was supposed to pay in the earlier deal for 126 jets. In the earlier deal during UPA, 18 jets to be made in France and the rest 108 in India by HAL. According to Trappier, the unit cost for the current 36 jets is actually 9% lower than the unit cost for 18 jets in the earlier deal. He said that only the price for 18 and 36 jets bought in flyway condition must be compared, the prices for jets made in India can’t be considered in this case. He also said that if the price was increased, Dassault would not have got the contract.

The CEO has rejected that there is any corruption in the deal as claimed by opponents of the deal in India, and clarified that it is open for an investigation in the matter. “We will prove that there is no corruption. We are open, we are engineers and we want to be in India”, he said.

Trappier said that they only want to develop capabilities in India not only for manufacturing but also for design and development. He said that he is a little bit sad about the controversy because India holds many opportunities that he is enthusiastic about.

Sringeri Mutt writes a letter urging PM Modi to reopen the pilgrimage to Sharda Peeth in PoK

A letter has been written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi by Jagadguru Mahasamsthanam of Sringeri urging him to reopen the pilgrimage to Sharda village in Pakistan occupied Kashmir and Sharda Peeth.


The letter was written by V.R. Gowrishankar, CEO and Administrator of Sringeri Mutt, says, “It is well known that Goddess Sharada is referred to as Kashmira-puravasini. The temple dedicated to Sharada was once a great centre of learning and was frequented by scholars of the highest calibre from all over the country.

This temple has been known as the throne of omniscience or Sarvajna Peeth. Adi Shankaracharya during his Digvijaya Yatra had eventually been to Kashmir and worshipped the goddess, won the scholars in debate and had ascended the Sarvajna Peeth.”

“It is the earnest wish of Hindus that this pilgrimage is made possible. A lot of Hindu devotees would be extremely delighted and grateful if they get an opportunity to visit the holy place at least once a year,” the letter also said.

Shiv Sena: An untrustworthy ally and a sorry excuse for the party Balasaheb Thackeray built

Despite its constant criticism of the BJP-led government in the centre and in Maharashtra by Shiv Sena, CM Devendra Fadnavis has dismissed speculations about BJP-Sena split and has kept his hopes alive of fighting the 2019 Lok Sabha elections together.

Addressing the session ‘4 Saal Kitna Kamaal?’ of ‘Mumbai Manthan’, Devendra Fadnavis asserted that the Shiv Sena is a part of the BJP-led governments at the Centre and in Maharashtra. “The Shiv Sena and the BJP would not have come together in the two governments if they had to contest separately.”

Downplaying the incongruous voices within Shiv Sena, Fadnavis seemed confident about continuing the partnership with the Shiv Sena in the upcoming Lok Sabha elections in 2019. He also declared that there are only two parties in the country who talk about Hindus and Hinduism- the BJP and the Shiv Sena.

However, the relationship between the BJP and Shiv Sena hasn’t been going very well for some time now. There has been a marked deterioration in their relationship. The strain in the alliance partners is also because of Sena’s unsparing attack on its ally, which particularly intensified after the BJP secured 82 seats in the 2017 BMC elections, almost equalising Sena’s tally of 84.

Shiv Sena is based on pro-Marathi ideology and Hindu nationalism, which was founded on 19 June 1966 by political cartoonist Balasaheb Thackeray. His charismatically enchanting personality and plucky demeanour caught fancy of the people of Maharashtra.

People started affiliating with the party in droves. In a sense he was successful in tapping into the latent disgruntlement brewing among the local Maharashtrians and with a tadka of Hindu nationalism, he managed to capture the national imagination as well.

The party originally emerged from a movement in Mumbai demanding preferential treatment for Maharashtrians over migrants to the city. But soon the party became reflective of a Hindu revivalist force, extolling unabashedly about its Hindu roots and serving the causing of Hinduism.

However, what now remains of Shiv Sena is nothing but an organisation characterised by tempestuous leaders, for whom eccentricity has arguably become the order of the day. The party is not only fighting for custodianship of Hinduism with the BJP and RSS, but it is also struggling to uphold its founding principles laid down by Balasaheb Thackeray.

It is facing tough headwinds from the BJP in its own backyard Mumbai, where the BJP has rapidly made inroads into what was traditionally Shiv Sena vote bank, compelling them to think beyond their conventional supporters. Part of this can also be attributed to Narendra Modi’s staunch pro-Hindu image and national reach. But Shiv Sena has itself to be blamed since it couldn’t provide its votaries with an intriguing alternative narrative.

The Marathi-centric narrative coupled with Hindu assertion and crude hooliganism towards North-Indians had its shelf life but Shiv Sena failed to realise the need to chisel their narrative as per the changing demands. Their own followers grew weary of their hackneyed discourse and their inability to excite people with a distinct narrative that offered hope, reinvigorated them and stirred their souls into rallying behind the party, the exact thing which Prime Minister Narendra Modi could inspire in millions India became the cause of their decline.

In such a scenario, it is hard to comprehend why Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis is craving to form a coalition government with them. Normally, the weak and the helpless approaches the all-powerful to form an association but this subservient penchant exhibited by most BJP leaders is rather unfathomable. On several occasions now, the BJP had to bear the brunt of the capricious nature of Shiv Sena leaders and endure their slights. Sena has always tried to punch above their weight by displaying a haughty disregard to others and claiming political snobbery.

Earlier this year, Shiv Sena president Uddhav Thackeray had announced his party would go it alone in all future elections. Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut snubbed BJP saying their outreach ‘Sampark for Samarthan’ was too little too late hinting towards going alone in the 2019 polls. Shiv Sena was also seen appeasing Muslims a few days back, which is at odds with the BJP’s no appeasement policy. Recently, Shiv Sena mocked its poll partner with a stinging “BJP ke acche din aa gaye” remark on the fuel price hike. Today, Uddhav Thackeray criticised CM Devendra Fadnavis for “delay” in declaring a drought.

Yes, in politics there are no enemies and one has to remain circumspect of the changing dynamics but certainly not at the cost of compromising one’s own principles or dignity. It is one thing to seek support from potential allies but altogether different thing to mollycoddle them and humour their intemperate behaviour.

If any understanding is not developed yet between the two parties, Fadnavis and other BJP leaders would do well to remain mute on the issue of the coalition government formation or at least be cautious in answering the questions related to it, instead of fawning over their potential coalition partner only to be snubbed later. Fadnavis can still remain agnostic about the collation with Sena till elections and then make the overtures depending upon the election result.

In a democracy, allies are very important, for they help you in legitimising your claim to power but one should always keep in mind the wise words of Benjamin Franklin- “Tricks and treachery are the practice of fools, that don’t have brains enough, to be honest.”

It is better to lose on your demerits than to lose on your alliance partner’s shortfalls and vices. When you are in the pole position, it is stupidity to seek additional fair play award points at the cost of your pole position, for everyone is in the race to win the race, not for any consolation.

‘Liberals’ turn death of child in a playground scuffle into ‘lynching’, ‘hate crime’, here is the truth

An eight-year-old boy Azeem died in a scuffle over a playground in Delhi’s Malviya Nagar outside a madrasa on Thursday.

As per reports, the incident took place yesterday morning when two groups of children between the age 8 to 12 years, from different communities, got into a fight where the victim Azeem lost his consciousness after he was pushed and hit his head on a motorcycle. Four minors, aged 10 to 12 years, have reportedly been apprehended by the police.

However, the unfortunate incident has been given a communal twist by the usual suspects, terming the death as ‘lynching’ and ‘hate crime’.


Siddiqui even went on to say that the fact that the young boy had died in a scuffle is a ‘cover-up’ and that the elders ‘instigated’ the young children to kill Azeem.


Some even added ‘details’ like the boy was dragged from his school and beaten to death.


OpIndia reached out to Malviya Nagar Police Station where the police confirmed that it was not a case of lynching. Malviya Nagar SHO also confirmed that it was neither a hate crime nor does it have any communal angle to it. Currently, the investigation is on.

As per reports, the situation in that area is usually tensed as the said land is disputed as the madrasa claims it as its own while the residents of the nearby JJ cluster believe it is a public land.

The unfortunate incident was a result of a playground scuffle between children. While on one hand, we saw “student leader” blame PM Narendra Modi insinuating that it was Modi who had vitiated the atmosphere because of which ‘Muslims are being lynched’, on the other, we saw mythical spins like ‘elders instigating’ the lynching and how this “is being treated as a hate crime”.

The liberals have long trivialised words like “hate crime” and “lynching” to suit their own agenda and narrative of communal hatred. However, using a bunch of children to further their agenda is a new low that the leftists have managed to achieve.