Home Blog Page 7621

Meet the journalism student who almost lost his career for shouting anti-Barkha Dutt slogans

Recently Barkha Dutt went on an overdrive to interview JNU Student Union’s President Kanhaiya Kumar, who was arrested and later released on conditional bail on charges of sedition after anti-India slogans were shouted on the campus. After coming out on bail, Kanhaiya gave an anti-government and anti-Modi speech, after which he has become the darling of some political parties and some sections of the media, especially of Barkha Dutt, who’s tweeting about him almost as much as she tweeted about her book a while back – basically making a strong sales pitch.

There is nothing wrong in interviewing someone, especially a student, who protested against the Prime Minister, but perhaps Barkha Dutt forgot how she reacted when a student protested against her.

It was back in 2011, when Anna Hazare led anti-corruption movement was at its peak and Radia tapes were leaked. Barkha Dutt was one of the journalists whose conversations with lobbyist Niira Radia were leaked and it was alleged as a proof of moral corruption and ethical wrongdoing, even if no proof of quid-pro-quo appeared to be there.

Many felt that journalists like Barkha Dutt had no moral rights to lecture about corruption when their own record was blemished. One of those who felt this was a journalism student at IIMC (Indian Institute of Mass Communication), which incidentally is situated in the JNU campus.

On the evening of 9th April 2011, this student, Yogesh Kumar Sheetal, was present at an anti-corruption gathering at India Gate in New Delhi. He saw Barkha Dutt present there, and he couldn’t control his anguish. He shouted a few slogans against Barkha and soon many joined him. Barkha had to leave the spot.

But it appears that she decided not to leave Yogesh so easily. A complaint against Yogesh was made to the Course Director at IIMC, and he was served a show cause notice. And that was just the beginning.

OpIndia.com decided to talk to Yogesh about what he had to experience after his expression of dissent. Following are the highlights of the interview.

Q: Did it all start with a complaint to your course director at IIMC, or were you warned of the consequences even before that? You have previously said you were intimidated…

Ans: No. Things came into action immediately after Barkha Dutt left the venue. People were getting extremely aggressive following physical assault by NDTV crews on protesters including women. I was not warned, I was directly targeted, but it misfired because of bad preparation by NDTV as they didn’t have the time to hatch a foolproof conspiracy. In less than half an hour, NDTV could only plan to file an assault case against me. NDTV’s Ruby Dhingra was planted as a victim and other crew members were presented as eye witnesses. It all started when a girl appeared out of the blue and started leveling number of serious allegations against me. I was stunned. Many people who gathered against Barkha Dutt had gone back to their work, but some of them were still walking around by that time.

Yogesh Kumar Sheetal
Yogesh Kumar Sheetal (pic courtesy his Twitter profile)

NDTV did first mistake when Ruby appeared before me along with her crew, expecting me to be alone and easy to be targeted. I was caught by NDTV’s crew and dragged to police. She told police that I assaulted her and put other allegations too. Her allegations were promptly reinforced by her crew members. Neither Ruby nor any of her crew members informed the police that they’re from NDTV. They were trying to portray that they had come for Anna’s movement.

During the same time, a lady and some protesters reached out to me to understand the situation. I didn’t notice that some protesters were still there. They knew what had happened and so they started shouting slogans again, and one of them exposed Ruby Dhingra. They explained to the police that I was innocent and the complainant has manufactured a story to malign me. After a short interrogation I was asked to go.

This was the starting point. The very next day I received a call from an unknown number. I was threatened that I would have to eat 22 Salfas tablets if I do not shut my mouth against Barkha Dutt. Perhaps the same day I was handed over a notice from IIMC, where I was a student of Hindi Journalism.

Q: When you were given a show cause notice by your institute, were you scared about your career prospects?

Ans: I was disturbed because of back to back threatening calls, but I was not scared. I had nothing to lose, so I had no reason to be scared. But, let me confess that I turned pessimistic about my career. This should not be read as “scared”.

Q: How did you survive and manage to get a diploma from IIMC? Did that incident haunt you and you feared that you could be failed?

Ans: There’s a saying in English, “Fear of danger is worse than the danger itself”. I was psychologically under pressure. That episode didn’t haunt me in IIMC since IIMC is not a Private Company like NDTV. Had I failed, I would have filed an RTI. I was prepared for that.

Q: How tough was it to get a job after getting the diploma? Were you told in clear terms that your slogan shouting against Barkha Dutt was something that was working against you?

Ans: One can understand it very easily. I don’t wish to recall those unpleasant days anymore but I do wish to recall one thing again and again. Due to this entire incident, I could meet A S Raghunath Sir, Anil Kohli Sir and many people. Twitter made everything possible for me. Raghunath Sir arranged my internship in a Hindi Tabloid Newspaper and till now I’m blessed with the guidance of Raghunath Sir and Anil Kohli Sir.

Q: What is your family background? Could you have afforded not getting a job due to such vindictive attitude of a celebrity journalist?

Ans: I belong to an average middle class family based in Begusarai, Bihar. It’s tough for me to imagine what I would have done had I not been helped by A S Raghunath Sir. I think I could have moved back to Bihar and started preparations for a competitive examination after ditching my dream to be a journalist. I always remember a couplet of famous Hindi poet Pash “Sabse khatarnak hota hai sapno ka mar jana“. I’m fortunate that my dream still survives and I want to be known as a journalist till my life.

Q: Did you ever try to get in touch with Barkha Dutt or someone in the NDTV to apologize or to “settle” the matter so that your career progresses smoothly?

Ans: I dismissed this idea with the contempt it deserved. I was residing in New Ashok Nagar, Delhi and getting Rs 6788/- as salary. It was a very difficult situation for me. For 2 years, I have had the worst phase of my life. There were days when I didn’t even have money to recharge my cellphone or to fulfil my daily basic needs like newspaper and magazines. There were days when I could only manage to make missed calls to people and get frustrated when people didn’t give a call back. However, every time I thought of settling things, I felt like I was betraying my well wishers.

Credibility is everything. If you don’t have integrity, credibility, character, discipline, manner, self confidence or determination or commitment, you can never get a sound life. Today, I don’t have money, I don’t have bank balance, I’m earning only Rs 31,000 in Mumbai and facing serious difficulties in my livelihood, but I’m happy because I’m not compromised. I have a lot to learn and I’m learning in Mumbai. I have my parents and they are my assets. I’m confident to speak to Raghunath Sir and Kohli Sir, that’s enough for me! I don’t need to shy away or run away from anything or anywhere. I’m happy.

Q: When and where did you finally get a job?

Ans: DLA, a tabloid newspaper, which is based in Agra, was the first newspaper where I got a chance to work as a sub editor in its Noida Edition in June, 2011. I always remember my DLA days where I learnt so many things from Shri Virendra Sengar and my colleagues.

Q: In retrospect, do you think you should not have taken the initiative and shouted slogans against Barkha? It doesn’t seem to have helped you a bit?

Ans: There’s a quote in English, “I don’t regret what I did but I regret what I didn’t do when I had time”. Same thing with me. I don’t think I should not have taken the initiative, in fact I think I should have taken this initiative more effectively. I have no regrets.

Q: Recently entire media lauded a Zee News reporter when he quit the organization accusing it of bias. Do you think the media will ever laud, or even report fairly, if someone quits an organization like NDTV accusing someone like Barkha?

Ans: I don’t know how to respond this question because I’ve least interest in News Channels’ internal politics.

Q: Has anyone, say your batchmates from IIMC who might be employed at NDTV or any other organization, confided in you about such inherent bias that they can’t talk about or revolt against? You are free not to reveal someone’s name and organization for obvious reasons.

Ans: To be very honest, I came to IIMC for getting a certificate not for learning journalism. IIMC is a good place for learning politics, not journalism. All students, who cracked entrance and interview, are already journalists. I’m still surviving in news industry because I know politics and I would like to extend my deep thanks and gratitude to my IIMC teachers for teaching me politics directly or indirectly. IIMC and NDTV seem to be locked in a relationship and both oblige each other in different ways.

Q: When you see Barkha Dutt supporting free speech and eulogizing someone like Kanhaiya for daring to take on the government, how do you feel?

Ans: Now, I have no time to feel anything. I have a lot many better thing to think and do in life. I search good stories and work on that and try to bring something worth watching for my audience. Barkha Dutt supporting free speech is like a CEO of a tobacco company campaigning for Cancer awareness.

Top Lies spread by Indian Media in February 2016

0

Big Lies:

1. Zee News: “Pakistan Zindabad” slogans were raised in JNU

We had done a post and a video on this. What was actually a group of students, presumably from ABVP, shouting “Bhartiya Court Zindabad”, was shown by Zee News as if they were saying “Pakistan Zindabad”. The police report abut JNU did not mention “Pakistan Zindabad” as a slogan but had many other slogans such as “Bharat ki barbaadi”, “Bharat tere Tukde honge” etc. The Delhi District Magistrate, in his report, also stated that the slogan can neither be “clearly heard” in the video, “nor in the transcripts of the JNU videos shot by the security staff”. This he says, showed that even the cops had doubts about this slogan. Even the ABVP students we spoke to confirmed that the slogans were “Bharatiya Court Zindabad” i.e. long live Indian Courts as a counter to the claims of “judicial killing” of Afzal Guru.

2. News X and India News: Portraying a doctored video of Kanhaiya as seditious.

By now it is pretty well known that these 2 channels played the doctored tape from 11th February. What Kanhaiya actually said was “Azadi” from social evils such as casteism etc. But the above 2 media houses showed this video by cutting the social evils part and showing Kanhaiya shouting only Azadi. Times Now too, in a way, did telecast the video, when Arnab egged Sambit Patra to show the video from his tablet, during a newshour debate.

3. Multiple media houses: BJP-AIMIM alliance will wipe out Congress says Owaisi

We had written a separate post on this here. Zee News,  CNN IBN, Aaj Tak and DNA reported the above news, based on a speech given by Owaisi in Hyderabad. As we had explained in our post, all these media houses heard only a part of his speech. Secondly, they completely misquoted Owaisi. In the video, Owaisi can be seen attacking Modi, BJP and Congress throughout. The key sentence which has been grossly misquoted by the media is when he says “Along with BJP, I will carry the corpse of Congress too”. This has been reported by media as “With BJP, I will carry the corpse of Congress”. To anyone seeing the full video it is clear that a man constantly attacking BJP and Modi and Congress cannot say in the same breath that he will combine with BJP to finish the Congress

4. NDTV / Firstpost: Martyr Captain Pawan Kumar was from and had studied at JNU

In an attempt to paint JNU as a place which also hosts students who go on to become patriotic army men, NDTV and Firstpost decided to use a martyred Jawan and claimed he was from JNU and had studied at JNU. He did have a JNU degree, but it was awarded to him because all military officers who graduate from the National Defence Academy (NDA) have under a special arrangement with JNU for this honorary degree. While NDTV changed the story, Firstpost continues to claim he had studied at JNU.

5. Multiple media sources: Delhi Police grab a woman by hair, punch and drag her

Multiple news outlets like ABP News, Huffington Post and Indian Express claimed in their reports that Delhi police acted violently with a woman in the protests against death of Rohith Vemula infront of RSS office. This news was based on a video released by AAP which showed a long haired individual get beaten up by cops. On closer observation though it was clear the long haired person was a man and not a woman. This does not justify any police brutality. We had written a separate post on this.

6. The Telegraph- “Fact Check” on Smriti Irani’s speech in Parliament

We had written a separate post on this. In their attempt to attack HRD Minister Smriti Irani, The Telegraph used all sorts of tricks. One such trick was when they claimed that the JNU administration is “facing charges/criticism”, hence the Minister’s claim that the JNU administration was independent and free from Government control was wrong. They even went as far to say that the security guards of a private company, recruited by the JNU administration cannot be called as free from Government control! There were a few more such arguments which we debunked in our above piece.

7. Times of India – Why not cut off traitors’ tongues? asks BJP general secretary Kailash Vijayvargiya

Times of India in the above report claimed that BJP general secretary Kailash Vijayvargiya wondered why the tongues of those who hail Pakistan and terrorists should not be “chopped off”. The headline and the opening paragraph made it clear that Times of India considered that this statement was of Kailash Vijayvargiya. But, the following paragraphs showed something different. Times of India in these paragraphs said: “Referring to his conversation with the former soldier who suggested chopping off of the tongues of those hailing Pakistan, Vijayvargiya said ‘It seemed to me he was voicing the thought of all patriotic Indians'”.  So now, Times of India is saying the “chopping off tongue” suggestion was made by a soldier. So what is the truth? The story was based on Vijayvargiya’s tweets, and if we see the tweets, the story is clear. Vijayvargiya was in fact narrating an incident, spread out in 6 tweets

1

Times of India had indeed mentioned the correct version in the latter portion of the article. Why then the utterly misleading headline and opening paragraph?

8. CNBC TV 18 – UAE offers two thirds of its oil to India for free

As can be seen from this tweet, CNBC TV 18 claimed that UAE had offered two-thirds of its Oil to India for free. Of course, this sounded to good 1to be true but a fair number of people fell for it. The truth however was much more realistic. UAE wanted to use some of India’s Strategic Petroleum Reserves to store its oil. Instead of paying rent to India to use these storage facilities, it offered India the right to use two-thirds of the oil stored in these reserves  in emergencies. Eventually CNBC deleted the tweet.

9. All media – Aamir Khan to be made ambassador of Maharashtra Scheme. 

Almost all news outlets reported that Aamir Khan was chosen as the ambassador for a Maharashtra scheme called ‘drought-free Maharahtra’. This was met with resentment due to his sensationalist statements on Intolerance. Eventually Maharashtra CM Fadnavis cleared the air and denied any such plans. As it turned out later, Aamir Khan’s non-profit organization, Paani Foundation had started a scheme in association with the Maharashtra Government, aimed at solving the state’s water crisis. Aamir was to also join hands with other actors such as Nana Patekar, to take forward his initiative. From no angle, had the Maharashtra Government appointed him a  brand ambassador.

10. ABP News: Kumar Vishwas may soon join BJP

Based on the fact that some BJP leaders were seen wishing Kumar Vishwas on his birthday, ABP News ran a story which claimed Vishwas had now become close to BJP and would be soon joining the party. Vishwas immediately took to twitter to trash the story saying people across party lines wished him. ABP News then deleted the story.

11. Aaj Tak – Nitish does U-Turn from his statement, says he never called Ishrat “Bihar ki Beti”

The misleading portion in this news is Aaj Tak claiming that Nitish Kumar had done a “U-Turn” from his “Bihar ki beti statement”. This implies Nitish had indeed said such a statement. The fact though is, he never said such a statement and it was in fact made by another JDU leader, Ali Anwar. Arguments can be made whether or not Nitish supported such statement by never condemning them, but fact remains, he personally never said it, and hence it doesn’t constitute a U Turn.

12. All media: BJP leader Gopal Shetty trivialises farmer’s suicide, claims suicide ‘a fashion now’

We had explained this lie via a video:

Media fabricates lies to attack BJP MPBJP MP never said that it is fashionable for farmers to commit suicide. Most of the media houses published reports on it.

Posted by OpIndia.com on Thursday, February 18, 2016

 

Miscellaneous lies:

1. ET Now: TRAI fails Netizens, Blow to Net Neutrality

Last month, TRAI had given a fairly pro-net neutrality decision on differential pricing of data services by telecom companies. This was hailed by most net neutrality activists. ET Now however completely misread the situation and instead gave the below captions, which showed a completely opposite and inaccurate picture:

1

2 The Hindu: Ishrat Jahan was an LeT suicide bomber says David Headley (later The Hindu denies this)

Initially The Hindu reported that David Headley, in his video deposition, claimed that Ishrat Jahan was an LeT suicide bomber. Soon, The Hindu issued a correction saying “Headley had not called Ishrat Jahan a suicide bomber for LeT during the deposition”. So what was the truth? The truth was in between both the versions. Headley had said that Ishrat worked for LeT i.e. she was an operative. There is a bit of difference in being a suicide bomber and an operative and in both the original story and the correction, The Hindu failed to bring this out.

3. Navbharat Times: BJP IT cell founder Prodyut Bora quits party attacks PM Modi and Amit Shah’s style

Yes Prodyut Bora had indeed left the BJP’s IT cell. Then what is the lie here? He had quit on February 19 2015. But extremely weirdly, Navbharat Times reported this as a fresh story exactly one year after it happened, on 19 February 2016. The story had no mention that the actual event took place a year ago. Obviously people felt this was a new happening.

4. ANI News: SFI activists protest in support of #JNU in Kolkata

Initially ANI news reported the above that SFI activists were agitating in Kolkata in support of JNU students. Later, they issued a correction saying the SFI activists were protesting in Kolkata against students lathi charged in Burdwan University. Even though the correction was tweeted, the original erroneous tweet exists till date and has much more Retweets than the correction.

5. India Today: Spiritualism and Materialism cannot co-exist says Sri Sri Ravi Shankar

India Today tweeted the below that Sri Sri Ravi shankar had said spiritualism  and materialism cannot co-exist. But if one actually sees his interview with Rajdeep Sardesai, at around the 27 mins mark, he clearly contradicts this statement and says the 2 are not all on a collision course and both can co-exist.

6. The Hindu – Slogans heard in JNU were ““Kashmir ki azadi tak bharat ki azadi tak, jang rahegi jari”

Small error or deliberate? This The Hindu report stated that the slogans raised at JNU, as per the video evidence, included “Bharat ki Azadi tak, jung rahegi”. Of course everyone know tht it actually was “Bharat ki Barbaadi tak”, but for some reason The Hindu posted the opposite. This was pointed out to The Hindu my many people but till the time of writing this, no change was made.

7. Firstpost/India Today: NSUI members protesting in Bhopal over JNU row

While Firstpost, India Today and a few more media houses reported that NSUI students were protesting in Bhopal over the JNU row, Local Media in Madhya Pradesh and even ANI news, reported that the NSUI protests were in fact for student union elections. This was declared even by NSUI Bhopal on their Facebook page.

8. The Hindu: Inaccurate and illogical graph

They say pictures speak louder than words, and indeed this graph by The Hindu speaks for it self. This “bar graph” is wrong in so many aspects its hard to figure out where one should begin. Firstly see 12-13 q which has 5.6. The bar is shown to be very small, and then see 14-15 which has “5.7.2” (how can a number have 2 decimal points), and the bar size is almost 10 times more than the 12-13 bar inspite of being just marginally more.  Next, 13-14 is 6.6,, which is more than 14-15’s “5.7.2”, yet 14-15 bar is bigger than 13-14!

9. The Indian Express: Anurag Thakur says slogans raised in JNU were “Bharat ki Azadi tak jung rahegi”

Like The Hindu, did The Indian Express also make the same “mistake”? While the slogans were unmistakably about “Bharat ki barbaadi”, The Indian Express to reported them as “Bharat ki Azadi” and even worse, attributed this statement to BJP MP Anurag Thakur. Just like Th Hindu, no correction was made by The Indian Express even after people pointed out the obvious error.

10. IBN Khabar: Hafiz Saeed comes out in support of JNU students 

As in many cases in the past, this time too Indian media did not disappoint. They took a tweet from a fake twitter handle (which was soon deleted) and claimed that it was the handle of Hafiz Saeed and he had just extended his support to JNU students.

 

January 2016: 20 lies

Twitter mob along with twitter india employee bully a 15yr old girl for having an opinion

0

cyberbullying
/ˈsʌɪbəˌbʊliɪŋ/
noun
meaning: the use of electronic communication to bully a person, typically by sending messages of an intimidating or threatening nature.

A Couple of days ago, a hero was born. A hero for the left, congress, AAP or more to put it with more objectivity — a hero for anyone who opposes Modi/BJP was born. A 28-year old hero whose parents are struggling with poverty, but he, instead of trying to earn for them, is living a luxurious life on state funds and glorifying poverty of his parents to gain sympathy. A hero who is using his FoE to the extreme and whose biggest ever achievement is getting arrested on charges of sedition. The orgasmic celebration of the same has been on since then.

On 6th March, I read about a girl Jhanvi Behal who challenged this new found leader for a debate. A girl who is just 15-year old; a girl, who, at 14, conducted a sting operation against liquor selling mafia in school and got them nabbed; a girl, who made a documentary on female foeticide; a girl whose efforts have been acknowledged by the PM on republic day. Mind you, she used her right to voice her opinion and media decided to air the same with articles and interviews. The first thought that came to my mind was, “Wow! at 15, this girl is so brave and aware”. I moved on to other news and forgot about Jhanvi.

But what I witnessed on the 7th morning was appalling, shocking and depressing. Jhanvi Behal was at the receiving end of jokes, mockery, veiled threats. The same liberals celebrating their JNU leader had turned into bullies — cyber bullies who seemed to have lost their head over a 15-year old girl challenge.

Most of these people, through their tweets, tried to corner her into silence and discredit her views.

And they were doing this unabashedly. With elan.

What gutted me was Twitter India politics & government head @raheelk was a part of it. He was mocking and teasing a 15-year old girl because she had an opinion. He himself and others have been vocally supportive of a once minor Malala, but when came to Jhanvi, all those ideals and principles were thrown out of window. They ganged up to humiliate her:

Sample these:
Screenshot_2016-03-07-15-45-19 Screenshot_2016-03-07-13-32-57 IMG_9vz77 IMG_o09b3a IMG_-wpy33k IMG_oxi9ka

If a 15-year old Malala’s opinions and views can be celebrated and respected (rightly so) by them then what is the issue with Jahnvi here. Reasons for the intolerance and hypocrisy at parade? There was a conspiracy theory angle to as to the right was wrong in promoting Jhanvi because that will make her a subject of snark n ridicule of the left just like how few hold females wear short clothes or drinking responsible for rape and molestation

Jhanvi Behal
So while twitter head @jack has #Iammalala on his bio, here we have his twitterindia employee @raheelk bullying a 15-year old. I wonder what the twitter’s safety councile has to say about this. Irony is, couple of days ago twitter launched #PositionOfStrength campaign in india to empower women to raise voices against any form of discrimination, and their twitter india employee indulges in just that.

Until @raheelk was questioned on his disgusting behaviour, he didn’t (or still doesn’t) feel it was wrong and would have continued on his bullying spree. He has not apologised but has merely RTed others arguments defending him. If he feels he was not wrong, why did he subsequently delete his tweets (wonder why?)

All this while i kept wondering why,why was she being cornered like this. What was her crime. Having an opinion? Supporting Modi? Having questioned their new god from JNU? Having a political view opposite to their is illegal?

Why was this cyber bullying taking place.

Cyber bullying of minor should not be taken lightly. Every other day we read about victims of cyberbullying,online intimidation & threatening. There are number of cases of this n one has to simply google to know. It can have a permanent,instant impact on one’s psyche and confidence.

Remember the “NDTV girl asks” memes, where it was turned into a sexist and cyberbullying case. She was an adult student who was questioned for a question which she asked. But the same bunch of journos and standups made it a cyberbulling case. Here Miss Behal, 15, is mocked by same people for her opinions. How does this selective intolerance by most amd silence by few work?

What will happen when this minor girl who has now been abused, mocked, threatened and joked about reads about what has been said, written today or tomorrow or a year later. Wouldn’t she ask or wonder as to the reason for all the heap of negativity towards her?

Is questioning someone wrong?
Is praising the PM Modi a crime?

Seeking for debates is right held by only a few and others must SHUT UP? Why is it that the current opposition jumps and drags down every girl, women having an opinion/view as opposed to them? Shouldn’t we rather be happy that we have young opinionated brave girls in our country. Instead of appreciating her or questioning her for her opinions, you guys ended up being CYBERBULLIES.

SHAME ON YOU.

Hope Raheel remembers his tweet on Malala:


Sri Sri speaks to us: World Culture Festival, Intolerance, Beef ban and much more

0

Even as the preparations for Art of Living’s World Culture Festival are going on in full swing, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, who was recently named in the Padma awardees list, took out time and spoke to us about various issues. Here is the transcript of the interview:

OpIndia.com: Sir, your organization, Art of Living is hosting this massive event “World Culture Festival” in March this year. What is the purpose of such a grand event? 

Sri Sri: The festival is a platform for bringing together people of different nationality, religion, race, etc to celebrate diversity. It will send the message that we are one world, one family. When people from all over the world come to the festival as a member of one family, it will reinforce the belief that we all can co-exist with our differences. When good people come together in such large number, it will create a ripple effect of positivity in the world. By showcasing rich cultural traditions of dance, music and art from around the world as well as Yoga, this festival will be a unique platform for spiritual and religious gurus, politicians, peacemakers and artists to spread the message of global peace and harmony in diversity.

 

OpIndia.com: The last time this event was held, it was hosted by Berlin. This year you have chosen Delhi as the venue. Any specific reason for the same?

Sri Sri: India is a land with a long tradition of spirituality and an impeccable track record of uniting people. So it’s apt that India is hosting this festival. But the message of one-ness needs to be taken to every place. We have the chosen the venue of the festival around the river Yamuna to bring public attention to the pollution of Yamuna and ignite the motivation to clean it.

 

OpIndia.com: In the past year or so, a bogey has been raised by certain sections that India is “intolerant” and thus unsafe for foreigners. Many of your devotees are from other countries. Do you think (a) India is really intolerant? (b) your devotees would be influenced by such media reports?

Sri Sri: No. A sense of belongingness is in our DNA. The mainstream population of this country is very tolerant and we can’t say this country has suddenly become intolerant. I do accept that there are people who are swinging to extremes and that’s a law and order problem and it is nothing new, it has been there from so many years in this country. In a country of 1.2 billion people, such criminal incidents do happen.

I feel that this country has more indifference than intolerance. We are indifferent. Whatever happens, we don’t care, we don’t bother. That should go. It is better to be a little bit intolerant, move away from indifference.

​I can’t speak for everybody and always there could be a mixed reaction. From a distance when people hear such negative things, there is a tendency to trust the media reports and avoid travelling to India. But those who have visited India before or known India wouldn’t give too much credence to such reports.

 

OpIndia.com: Now there is pressure from activists to legalize homosexual sex in India. There is a demand for scrapping Sec 377. Where do you stand on this and do you feel this is another facet which should not create a problem for Hinduism?

Sri Sri: Homosexuality is not a crime and nobody should face discrimination based on their sexual preferences. Hinduism has never considered homosexuality a crime and to brand a person a criminal based on sexual preference would be absurd. Everyone has male and female elements. According to their dominance, tendencies show up and may change.

 

OpIndia.com: There is a great debate for modernisation of certain Hindu customs and practices. Do you think the time has come for all religions to do the same? Can all religions do the same with equal open-mindedness? 

​Sri Sri: Tradition, technology, trade and truth are the four key factors, which need to be revived time and again. Unless they are revived, the whole meaning for which they were initiated will be lost. Ancient and modern methods should be synergised. This is true of all religions and traditions. When there is no reform in religion, it tends to get dogmatic.

 

OpIndia.com: Recently the Government of India started the The Gold Monetization Scheme  which is aimed at bringing out the existing stock of gold in India into the open liquid market. Temples, being one of the largest amassers of Gold are expected to take part in the same. This scheme is expected to reduce India’s Gold import bill, thereby strengthening the economy. There has been concern from some quarters that this would be an attempt to loot Hindu temples. Where do you stand on this issue? 

Sri Sri: ​I don’t see a problem as long as the temple managements are transparent and if they maintain accounts properly. At the same time, the ancient jewels and artefacts should not be pledged as gold.​

 

OpIndia.com: We at OpIndia.com have made it a practice to analyse and document the shortcomings of Indian media and the half-truths and whole lies spread by them. Having interacted with media across the globe, and also having seen the media standards in India, do you think Indian Media needs to stop and reflect on their actions?

Sri Sri: The advent of social media has made it imperative for the traditional media to be more responsible, more authentic. Today there is more trust in social media. Everyone should reflect on their actions from time to time, not just media.

 

OpIndia.com: In an interview, you recently said in the context of the Beef ban, that bans are not desirable. In the USA, Horse meat is banned in numerous states for many reasons such as religion and the affection the locals have for horses, whom the consider as a companion. Is such a ban on beef, on similar grounds, tenable in India?

​Sri Sri: A ban on beef has become inevitable in India now as the cattle population has gone down from 120 crores to just around 20 crores. Just as horses are considered a part of a family in the US, cows are part of family too and need to be protected. If it happens voluntarily, it’s better. The ideal situation would be if people do it voluntarily.

 

OpIndia.com: In the same interview, Rajdeep Sardesai compared Art of Living with Missionaries of Charity, and in response you asked him to do his research better. There are many such Christian groups in India who do “charity” and simultaneously are involved in proselytization and other evangelical activities, especially in rural India. On the other hand, there are almost no such organizations from the Hindu side which indulge in conversions. Is this a short-coming of the religion and will this harm Hinduism in the years to come?

Sri Sri: ​Hindu religion is vulnerable to inducements and conversion because there is no authority which holds people to a religion. It is a free religion. The freedom of expression and freedom of worship is ingrained. So, there is no one authority which prevents or holds people from other influences.

Here, religious leaders and the pandits should play a role in explaining all the Tattvas and the spiritual knowledge aspect of the religion!

 

OpIndia.com: As one of the initiatives of this Government, Yoga was given a global platform and the PM was seen hard-selling Yoga at the UN and also in India. Many so called “secular” journalists and commentators mocked this effort as an attempt to saffronize and Hindutva-ize our culture. You must have seen scores of non-Indians embrace Yoga without any fear of being “saffronized”. Why do you feel such scepticism arise in Indians when we speak about Indian traditions? Is this more political than ideological?

Sri Sri: ​Decades of self-blame and low self-esteem has resulted in this state we are in. We need to shed the low self-esteem we reel in and take more pride in our cultural and spiritual roots. Yoga has been absorbed into mainstream lifestyle by people from all cultures and backgrounds across the globe.

 

(Note: Special thanks to Mr Ankit Jain for arranging this interview. Questions were sent to Sri Sri Ravi Shankar before the Yamuna Controversy)

What were you doing when you were 28?

After the electrifying speech of Kanhaiya, Indian media has already declared him “Student of the Year”. Odes are sung, eulogies are prepared, op-eds are written. However, during this whole JNU episode, people are again raising the argument which they raised during FTII controversy, which questioned, “till what age should the state fund education of students?” Another interesting argument is that if Kanhaiya’s parents are very poor and Kanhaiya can earn to uplift them, should he not also focus on earning his livelihood instead of just wasting his time in protests and dharnas.

 started a poll on Twitter, asking, “What were you doing when you were 28?”. The poll has gone viral. People are not only voting but also sharing their experiences. Some of our readers requested us to compile and share these stories. We have picked some of the tweets and responses on his poll:


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


We will like to hear your stories too. Please use the comment section to share your part of “What were you doing when you were 28?”

Kejriwal shared fake “Pakistan Zindabad” JNU video to target ABVP, will he apologise?

0

At the height of the JNU anti-national slogans incident, there were videos and counter videos flying across from all sides. In this melee, Delhi CM Shri Arvind Kejriwal shared the following video:


The tweet by Kejriwal quoted a tweet by ABP News’ journalist Abhisar Sharma, who had originally shared the “shocking” video. The same video was shared by AAP leader Dilip Pandey, which was then retweeted by Delhi’s Cabinet Minister Satyendar Kumar Jain. AAP leader Ashutosh also tweeted about this video and was retweeted by another AAP leader Sanjay Singh.

1

Kejriwal later gave a statement too to NDTV that the “Pakistan Zindabad” slogans were raised by ABVP to malign JNU:

This video was also shared by many other controversial journalists such as Mihir Sharma, Shivam Vij (who has since deleted the tweet) and CNN-IBN employee Zakka Jacob:


This video was also shared by Left supporter Swara Bhaskar and General Secretary of CPI Sitaram Yechury. The original tweeter “Siddharthya Roy”, who has been a columnist for Newslaundry , The Hindu, The Hoot and possibly also for The Wire, has now deleted his account, perhaps realizing the truth of the video, which this post will talk about.

First have a look at the video:

The entire video focuses on a 10 second clip from the 9th of February in which some ABVP students are seen and some slogans are heard which seem to be calls of “Pakistan Zindabad”. So are these really ABVP students? Are they really shouting “Pakistan Zindabad” slogans? Was this a planned strategy by ABVP?

From the pictures, it appears these are indeed ABVP students. The girl circled in the video though never shouts any slogan, but another male student on the right is seen saying “Zindabad”. So was he saying “Pakistan” Zindabad? Listen to the clip again, this time maybe without the video:

Does it still sound like “Pakistan” Zindabad? Especially the second time? No! That slogan was not raised. It’s a bunch of guys saying “Bhartiya Court Zindabad”. 

Does this explain why the police report abut JNU did not mention “Pakistan Zindabad” as a slogan but had many other slogans such as “Bharat ki barbaadi”, “Bharat tere Tukde honge etc?” To get further confirmation, we talked to a ABVP student from JNU and he confirmed that the slogans were “Bharatiya Court Zindabad” i.e. long live Indian Courts as a counter to the claims of “judicial killing” of Afzal Guru.

Arvind Kejriwal had instructed the District Magistrate to conduct an inquiry into the claims that ABVP had shouted these anti-national slogans. Even the District Magistrate’s report states that, in the FIR, the police too mention Pakistan Zindabad in inverted commas, but not any other slogan. The DM further states that the slogan can neither be “clearly heard” in the video, “nor in the transcripts of the JNU videos shot by the security staff”. This he says, showed that even the cops had doubts about this slogan. And this, as we know, is eventually reflected in the police’s submission to the court, which skipped this slogan entirely.

But, surprisingly, although the brief of the DM was to investigate the role of ABVP, his 1 page summary letter does not even mention ABVP. Neither does the report anywhere mention any clean chit to ABVP, although he himself says doubts existed that the slogan “Pakistan Zindabad” was even raised.

So did  a group of AAP and Leftist leaders, along with another group of Leftist journalists, spread a fake video around to attack ABVP at the height of the anti-national controversy? Whom were they trying to protect? Will any action be taken against them? Will they apologise?

As to how did this entire propaganda that “Pakistan Zindabad” slogans were shouted begin, see this. 

Truth Labs Report

Another angle to this issue is what did Truth Labs, the forensic lab checking the videos say?  Truth Labs’ final observation on Q4 (the name they gave to a longer version of this video, which besides the above, had Kanhaiya’s speech etc) was that Q4 was an “authentic recording, representing actual events”! How did they arrive at this conclusion? The report said that there were “no abrupt changes in pitch and intensity contours” and “no signs of temporal and spatial distortions”. 

So the DM has doubts about this video, the police do not say this slogan was raised, ABVP students corroborate, but the forensic lab which studied these videos said Q4 which was the video shared by Kejriwal and the video with “Pakistan Zindabad” slogan was an “authentic recording, representing actual events”,  all on the basis of some technical analysis? This in spite of the fact that the content clearly claims that “Pakistan Zindabad” is being shouted, whereas you can hear yourself (and we confirmed it from JNU sources) that it was “Bhartiya Court Zindabad”.

In our opinion Truth Labs should have simply stated that there doesn’t seem to be malicious editing of the video, such as adding/deleting audio/video tracks. By saying it was an “authentic recording, representing actual events”, they have exceeded their scope since they have not analysed the content of the video, and hence cannot opine whether the video, along with all its annotations and commentary represents actual events.

Proud of You, Media!

0

Thank You, Media!

It is with pride I can now say that Indian media has indeed evolved. For long, I have been very critical of the prime-time shows, their anchors and their guests. In this post, I would like to focus on the anchors and their diligent covering of news and their follow-ups.

When the news of Lance Naik Hanumanthappa Koppad being alive after 11 days buried in snow came about, it was heartening to see Bhupendra Chaubey rush to Betadur village in Karnataka to share the happiness of Koppad’s wife and mother. The interview really bought tears to my eyes. He wonderfully followed it up with asking Indians to have silent prayers at the India Gate. When all their prayers didn’t bear fruit and Hanumanthappa Koppad martyred, the nation wept along with his beleaguered family.

I expected the media to let the family mourn in private. After the burial, it was Ravish Kumar this time – who went to South India for the first time and talked to the Koppad family. After all, the Koppads were also poor – very much like a JNU student who was put behind bars. I give Ravish immense credit for not asking his favourite “jaat” question too. This is a case study for future journalism students on how language must not be a barrier or excuse to not cover news.

Koppad

This is the site of Koppad’s mortal remains as shown by Ravish on his show. Two flags respect the martyr. The State government has promised to make this site a memorial. I am sure Ravish will follow-up on this news. In the mean time, I cannot forget those 60 minutes on February 13 when the Indian tricolor flew proudly in his show – no talk, no guests, no news. What a way to mark your respect to the soldiers and a message to the government to take care of our heroes!

This was not all. I had many more surprises waiting for me.

Rajdeep Sardesai, of all people, proved me wrong. I had expected him to not move out of his comfort areas of Lutyens, Montenegro or New York. But, there he was. He and his team visited the home-town of each of the 10 soldiers who were buried in Siachen. The pain of the families of the soldiers left me speechless. It was natural that Hanumanthappa’s story was the limelight, because of the odds he had faced to come alive. But, it was Rajdeep’s prime time show that made me realise that 9 other soldiers who were buried – their dead bodies were stuck in Kashmir. Weather didn’t allow the bodies to be flown to their home-towns for the final-rites for days. Rajdeep and his team were on the job taking the government to task for not being able to devise alternate ways to ensure the families get the bodies of the martyred soldiers faster. Talk of holding the elected government’s feet to fire.

The biggest surprise for me was from Barkha Dutt. I have to confess I hated her for the Radia episode, for her chubby relationship with Congress leaders and many other things. But imagine Barkha reporting from a war zone in Chattisgarh. It is not like a daily routine where she can hop onto a ride to JNU or 10 Janpath for a talk on how to change a narrative. But in this ongoing anti-maoist operation, based on various reports, fifteen CRPF commandos are injured and three are killed. The visuals of Barkha running from the operations center in Raipur, asking for minute to minute updates from the commanding officer, reminded me of 26/11 where she was giving a live commentary to India. Her cameraman running behind her, as the shaking images make it clear – was the type of journalism we have romanticized for ages. It is a different matter that Maoists may not have TV sets, so that they could have benefited from live updates from Barkha. Her concern for the soldiers and the villagers in the line of fire was palpable in that breathtaking reporting.

I had given up hopes on Indian journalism. My friends would tell me to watch or listen to local media to get local news. But I would argue that in Karnataka, how can I know what is going in naxal afflicted areas of Chattisgarh. I am so proud to be proven right. The prime time shows have re-affirmed common man’s faith in media. It was indeed “sense over sensationalism”. Borrowing quote from a favourite politician, I can say “Proud of You, Media!”

Reviving Indian Textbooks: The Barkha files

Last week we launched a campaign: #SaveOurChildren. The thought emerged from the HRD Minister’s speech in Parliament where she read passages from Class IV and Class VI textbooks, approved by the previous UPA regime, which are factually incorrect, distort history, and paint India in poor light with respect to the ongoing conflict with Pakistan on Kashmir.

There have always been murmurs about how several facets of the history, geography, economics, and civics we teach our children are written by agenda merchants, pop historians, and establishment professionals, who made careers out of carving out a neo-Anglican narrative, which constantly and purposely demeans the Indian dharmic narrative. Hence, we launched #SaveOurChildren, asking all our readers and people at large, to send to us such cases of distortion.

We received an overwhelming number of entries, on a variety of topics. Eventually, we will make a collection of these problems with our children’s books and we will then petition the Union Minister for Human Resource Development Mrs. Smriti Irani to:

  1. Verify if such passages indeed in our textbooks
  2. Verify if such textbooks are still being used
  3. Get these references fact-checked
  4. Issue corrections wherever needed

Today we publish the first tranche of such cases sent to us by readers. While we were expecting a fair bit of historical, cultural and political distortion, we had never imagined we would find in textbooks, the names of modern day journalists, who are still working in their field. One such name was of Barkha Dutt. While Barkha is arguably one of India’s most prominent female faces on TV, she is one of the most controversial ones too.

She has received extreme criticism for her poor or rather excessive coverage of the 26/11 terror attacks, which eventually might have helped terrorists in their mission. She has long denied this, but recently she did admit to this and this was her best defence:


She has also been embroiled in the Radia tapes issue, where she was heard discussing political formations with Nira Radia, a power broker. Barkha was accused of lobbying and power-broking for former telecom minister A Raja.

Of course Barkha emerged absolutely unscathed out of both the above controversies, controversies which could have finished careers in another time, in another land. The same cant be said though of Chaitanya Kunte, a blogger whose only crime was to expose Barkha’s shoddy reporting on 26/11. He was sued by Barkha, hounded and his blog was shut down.

For these reasons, it is appalling to see readers claiming that she finds a mention in textbooks which our children our reading:

A reader claims the above picture is from a CBSE textbook.

And this is another instance where she is said to be mentioned in a sanskrit textbook:

If the above is true, those who were in favour of a “nuanced” history should also consider if Barkha Dutt’s antecedents should also be listed in books, if at all her name should be there in the first place. Once the campaign is over, we shall send over these claims by various people to the HRD ministry so that they can verify that these are indeed real and then take appropriate action. Till then, you can send your entries :

Click their pictures and share with us:

On our Twitter handle @OpIndia_com

or

On our Facebook page

or

Email to us at [email protected]

or

If you wish to remain anonymous, use file sharing sites like these.

Append these social media posts with the hashtag #SaveOurChildren. Do not forget to mention these details along with your submission: The name of the state, the name of the board / agency (CBSE, ICSE, NCERT, State Board etc) and the class/division the book is from.

 

What the courts say in Kanhaiya’s bail order

Today, JNUSU President Kanhaiya Kumar, who was arrested for investigation with relation to anti-national activities was released by the courts on “conditional interim bail”. This did not stop some journalists, who at one point had  called Ishrat Jahan an “innocent, moon-faced teenager”, from frothing at their mouths and declaring this bail to be an acquittal:


The courts will eventually decide whether he is innocent or not, but as of now at least, the court order reveals a lot. The judgement itself starts off with a patriotic song. This should indicate where things are heading:

‘Rang hara Hari Singh Nalve se, Rang laal hai Lal Bahadur se, Rang bana basanti Bhagat Singh, Rang aman ka veer Jawahar se. Mere Desh ki Dharti sona ugle Ugle here moti mere desh ki dharti’

The judgement states that the slogan “Pakistan Zindabad” does not figure in the list of 30 slogans filed in the status report by the state.

The next key point is that the judge states that Kapil Sibal, who is representing Kanhaiya, has accepted that Kanhaiya was at the spot where the slogans were shouted. While Sibal maintains Kanhaiya had no role to play in the ongoings of 9th February, this is also an admission of the fact, which was apparent from many videos, that Kanhaiya was very much present there. The judge also states that

His presence at the spot on the day of incident when alleged antinational event was organised, is not disputed

What Kanhaiya was doing there is a different argument, but this acceptance of Kanhaiya being present there flies in the face of TV journalists who couldn’t see him:


//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

The judgement also states that the police has statement of witnesses who say Kanhaiyya talked to the concerned JNU authorities showing his resentment about the cancellation of the permission for the event on 9th February. This, the police say, is indication that Kanhaiyya was more than a bystander. This needs to be examined by a court.

The judge then refers to some of the slogans raised at the 9th February event:

1. AFZAL GURU MAQBOOL BHATT JINDABAD.

2. BHARAT KI BARBADI TAK JUNG RAHEGI JUNG RAHEGI

3. GO INDIA GO BACK

4. INDIAN ARMY MURDABAD

5. BHARAT TERE TUKKDE HONGE– INSHAALLAHA INSHAALLAHA

6. AFZAL KI HATYA NAHI SAHENGE NAHI SAHENGE

7. BANDOOK KI DUM PE LENGE AAZADI.’

The judge takes serious note of these slogans and says that

“Freedom of speech guaranteed to the citizens of this country under the Constitution of India has enough room for every citizen to follow his own ideology or political affiliation within the framework of our Constitution“.

She also reminds everyone that such freedom is afforded to him “because our forces are there at the battle field situated at the highest altitude of the world where even the oxygen is so scarce that those who are shouting anti-national slogans holding posters of Afzal Guru and Maqbool Bhatt close to their chest honoring their martyrdom, may not be even able to withstand those conditions for an hour even.”

The judge further notes that:

The kind of slogans raised may have demoralizing effect on the family of those martyrs who returned home in coffin draped in tricolor

The judge also has a few words for the JNU faculty:

The faculty of JNU also has to play its role in guiding them to the right path so that they can contribute to the growth of the nation and to achieve the object and vision for which Jawaharlal Nehru University was established.

The judge then says the JNU administration should find out why such thoughts enter the students’ minds and asks them to take remedial steps so that there is no recurrence of such incident.

In harsher words, the judge also chastises the students saying:

The investigation in this case is at nascent stage. The thoughts reflected in the slogans raised by some of the students of JNU who organized and participated in that programme cannot be claimed to be protected as fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression. I consider this as a kind of infection from which such students are suffering which needs to be controlled/cured before it becomes an epidemic. Whenever some infection is spread in a limb, effort is made to cure the same by giving antibiotics orally and if that does not work, by following second line of treatment. Sometimes it may require surgical intervention also. However, if the infection results in infecting the limb to the extent that it becomes gangrene, amputation is the only treatment

Finally, the judge says:

To enable him to remain in the main stream, at present I am inclined to provide conservative method of treatment

Further, considering Kanhaiyya’s claim that his mother earns barely Rs 3000 per month, the judge sets the bail bond at Rs 10000.

The judge ends the order with the statement that the observations made above are only for the purpose of deciding the bail application and shall not be considered as an expression on merits.

Seeing the language and remarks of the judge, it wont be surprising to see some people launching attacks on the judge and her “hyper-nationalism”.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

The EPF mess and how not to bring in a taxation change

0

The Union Budget 2016 was largely seen as a pro-farmer- anti-big shots, pro-jobs and pro-small businesses due to many measures taken to uplift these sectors. But there has been one issue which has hurt the “middle-class” of India: Bringing PF under tax ambit.

Until now EPF has been the holy grail of all salaried employees. Tax free at all stages from deposit to withdrawal, secure, and a very high rate of Interest. Now, with a prospective effect, the returns are going to diminish significantly since part of the proceeds maybe taxed. Without going into the technical details, there have also been some pre-budget moves to make withdrawal of money from EPF harder.

Why has the Government suddenly turned towards EPF?

The stated objective of the Government, as per the PIB release and other statements is this:

The Government wants EPF kitty to be used by people as a post-retirement fund from which they can earn pension. The people on the other hand use EPF for various purposes, and often withdraw large sums from the account, much before retirement to meet expenses arising from weddings, education or anything they deem fit. The Government is of the view that they have given you a completely tax-free instrument, for your retirement security, and not for your expenses before that, so if you want to spend it before retirement, we will tax you.

Firstly, the Government’s intention is not completely wrong. There can be situations where a person withdraws money prematurely and then is left with nothing at his retirement. The Government just wants to avoid this situation.

But, the means used to arrive at this desired goal are completely wrong. They have failed to factor in that for decades now, people have looked at and used EPF from a completely different angle, and now, midway through one cant just change the rules of the game. Sure, the money which has been deposited pre-April 2016 will not be touched, but still, it is a setback for those who though EPF will help them accumulate money for the any big expense lined up.

Another reason for taxing EPF now is to bring it on par with NPS. NPS is the pension scheme started last year, probably to help take forward the intention of providing retirement security. But till recently, NPS was not competitive as compared to EPF due to different taxation policy. Now, what the Government has done is made both NPS and EPF taxable equally, ensuring parity, and in short nudging people to move towards NPS.

Again, the means used to nudge people to NPS are wrong. It was widely expected that to bring both the schemes on par, NPS will also be made exempt throughout, like EPF, but the Government has gone in the other direction.

Even with this approach, which has now drawn lot of flak, the Government could have reduced the brickbats, but the entire approach to this change has been miserably unplanned. This is just an extension of the abysmal communication skills of this Government.

Before we study how they messed it up here, jog your memory to another scheme which pinched the common man but was implemented largely successfully: The Give it Up campaign. PM Modi made many appeals to Indians (who can afford to do so) to give up voluntarily, their LPG subsidy. There was a clear explanation of rationale: that this subsidy is meant for the poor and not for those who can afford it, and it burdens the Government. The call was largely successful.

By December 2015, it was reported that over 57 lakh LPG consumers had voluntarily given up their subsidies. And that was when the next phase was implemented: Withdrawal of subsidy for those who earn above Rs 10 lacs. Here was a scheme, where the Government made efforts to educate people, get the public sentiment on their, and then brought in a rule to implement it.

Contrast this with the EPF taxation move. Sure, the amounts involved are different, the scheme is different, but see the non-existent messaging here. First see what the Finance Minister’s speech had to say on this:

Pension schemes offer financial protection to senior citizens. I believe that the tax treatment should be uniform for defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans. I propose to make withdrawal up to 40% of the corpus at the time of retirement tax exempt in the case of National Pension Scheme. In case of superannuation funds and recognized provident funds, including EPF, the same norm of 40% of corpus to be tax free will apply in respect of corpus created out of contributions made after 1.4.2016.

This is all that was said by Arun Jaitley on this issue. Nowhere, the intention of the Government was highlighted in his speech. If you don’t even tell me that what you are doing is good for me, why should even imagine that it is even remotely good? The finance bill too is silent on this. It is only the PIB clarification, which comes after a lot of outrage, which states this. Obviously, people are going to take this as an after-thought and not the main objective. Who is to blame for this?

And it gets worse. There was complete lack of coordination between what different faces of the Government said:

1

(sources: Budget Speech, NDTV interview, ANI statement, Press Conference, PIB release)

Not only did the Government fail to communicate why they want to do what they are doing, they also chose a very tax-payer unfriendly means for the same, and then completely bungled up the response. The more bitter the pill, the more sugar coated it has to be, and here the forgot the sugar coating and also the candy after the pill!