Gujarat High Court

The High Court observed that the essential Hindu rituals, as required under the Hindu Marriage Act, form the foundation of a Hindu marriage.

The court stated, "Continuous engagement in the act of cow slaughter can offend religious feelings and incite social unrest."

Pathan claimed adverse possession over the land, arguing that he had been occupying the government land at least 12 years.

The Trial Court had previously denied Sarfaraz and Ramiz Raja's discharge applications in the conversion case.

From banning AI in adjudication to restricting evidence processing and imposing accountability, the Gujarat High Court’s policy responds to growing misuse of AI tools, as courts increasingly confront fabricated citations and unreliable outputs in proceedings.

The present case stems from an appeal filed in the High Court by the royal family of Danta. In this petition, a 2008 judgment of the Banaskantha District Court has been challenged.

Gujarat High Court dismissed 150 Waqf petitions, ruling boards must pay court fees like temples and other faiths. It ended years of exemptions under the Waqf Act, clarifying Section 83 proceedings as full litigation. Deputy CM hailed it as historic for equality.