During the infamous Shaheen Bagh sit-in protest back in 2020, Islamo-leftists decided to bring forward women and children to protest against the Citizenship Amendment Act. Five years later, the Cockroach Janta Party-led ‘student protest’ in New Delhi saw a massive presence of ideologically driven youngsters, hurling abuses against Hinduism, Brahmins, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and continuing the degeneracy since then. One such Hinduphobic CJP supporter is Nishu Azad.
‘Tum Talwar uthao, hum kalam uthayenge’: Nishu Azad, the Ambedkarite CJP ‘cockroach’ who didn’t know the full forms of NEET and CBSE
Nishu Azad is a 15-year-old Dalit student and social media ‘activist’ from Uttar Pradesh’s Ghaziabad, who identifies as an ‘Ambedkarite’ and atheist. Azad gained prominence during the CJP protests in July this year.
The self-declared ‘Ambedkarite’ Nishu Azad was actively involved in the CJP protest. She gave various interviews to the media.
Nishu Azad would deliver aggressive speeches, confront critical media questions with expectedly juvenile arguments, read ‘Tum Talwar uthao, hum kalam uthayenge’ type poems, but fail to even tell the full form of NEET (National Eligibility cum Entrance Test), the very examination that triggered the CJP agitation. She would boast to be a CBSE (Central Board of Secondary Education) student and not know CBSE’s full form.
Meet 15 yo CJP Sherni Nishu "Azad"
— Dear Men (@Dear_Men_Life) September 5, 2026
Even Days:
"Tum Mandir Banao,
Hum School Jaenge"
Tum Talwar Pakdo,
Hum Kalam Pakdenge"
Odd Days:
Full form of NEET "NASA Eligible Karke Kuch hai.."
CBSE Fullform Don't know.
"Fault of system that CBSE Fullform is not taught"
🤡 pic.twitter.com/fao5mIwwyd
To escape the embarrassment, Azad blamed the education system, which somehow has been so careless that it failed to teach Nishu Azad these basic full forms.
In June this year, Nishu Azad was seen hurling abuses at PM Modi and inviting people to a 13th-day funeral feast for PM Modi’s death. Now she has issued a ‘clarification’ that she did not say ‘Modi ke Terhavi ka khana’ on her own but read from a board. The video, however, shows her reading the highly insensitive poster quite gleefully.
Modi ji ki Terahvi ka khana bantati Masoom ladki 😭 pic.twitter.com/Hr2WkKspjM
— GarudEyeIntel | OSINT 🇮🇳 (@GarudEyeIntel) September 4, 2026
Nishu Azad is the daughter of an Ambedkarite ‘activist’ Sanjay Azad, who has been in the news over his allegations against an influencer, Swatantra Bhardwaj, that the latter assaulted him during the CJP protests at Jantar Mantar. Bhardwaj, however, denies deliberately hitting Sanjay Azad’s head.
Seeing the massive opportunity of polishing his image as a messiah of Dalits and ‘youth’ at one go, Congress MP Rahul Gandhi extended support to Nishu Azad despite her own abusive and anti-Hindu proclivities.
Case filed against Nishu Azad and her father for Hinduphobic posts
As the controversy around the anti-Hindu activist and her father rages on, advocate Amita Sachdeva has lodged a police complaint against Nishu Azad and her Ambedkarite father Sanjay Azad over Nishu’s Hinduphobic posts.
Speaking to ANI, advocate Sachdeva said, “Yesterday I came across some tweets posted by her on ‘X’. They were old tweets. She used the word Vaishya [prostitute] for goddess Maa Durga; she mocked goddess Saraswati. So yesterday I gave her a warning and asked her politely to delete these posts. You cannot insult my gods. If you want to believe them, it’s your choice. We will not allow that. So I gave her time till 1 pm (on Saturday), but they didn’t do that. Neither she nor her father. Then I was constrained to file the complaint, which I did. And the police have assured us that they will take necessary steps.”
Meanwhile, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) member Priyank Kanoongo has said that CJP leaders can face legal action for involving the minor girl in their ‘illegal protest’, under Section 83(2) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. The provision criminalises the use of minors by an adult or a group of adults for illegal activities.
Nishu Azad has a track record of hurling abuses against Hinduism and Hindu deities
Minors, youth or adults, all Islamo-leftists claiming to be liberal and progressive are inherently and selectively hateful towards Hinduism. For them, Hinduism alone is regressive, anti-woman, dogmatic, and whatnot, while several other religions being way more explicitly anti-women and regressive are not subjected to even any performative criticism.
Earlier this year, OpIndia reported about an adult Ambedkarite activist, Satish Bauddh, who identifies as a Buddhist but hurls the worst abuses at Hindu deities and scriptures in the name of promoting rationality and scientific temper.
In late April, Satish Bauddh addressed a public event commemorating Dr Bhim Rao Ambedkar’s birthday in Delhi’s Ashok Nagar. Satish Bauddh delivered a speech wherein he began with the usual hateful commentary against the ‘Manuwadi ideology’, caste, and superstition, to incite Dalit Hindus to convert to Buddhism. The rhetoric soon shifted to spewing vitriol against Hindu deities, scriptures and beliefs.
Nishu Azad is no different. Her rhetoric and social media activity indicate that, despite her young age, the ‘atheist-Ambedkarite’ harbours deep hatred towards the Hindu community, Hindu faith, and Hindu Devi Devtas.
Declaring Hindu Gods as ‘imaginary’, Nishu Azad wrote in November 2024 on X, “Brahmins insulted the female gender in the name of Hindu Vedic religion, saying that the Dalit bride was sent to a Savarna house on the first night after marriage for her disrobing; Savarna people raped a Dalit pregnant girl. #हिंदू_भगवान_काल्पनिक_है .”
In one of her videos, Azad suggested that instead of Maa Saraswati, Savitribai Phule should be considered goddess of knowledge.
Commenting on the shoe-hurling against former Chief Justice of India BR Gavai in early October 2024, Nishu Azad wrote, “What even Vishnu himself couldn’t uproot, what can these lime thieves possibly uproot… A case should be filed against the one who threw a shoe at Gawai Sahib under sedition charges, and he should be sentenced to life imprisonment….”
In another such post, she wrote, “Sir @grok ji, Ram, Hanuman, and Krishna—are all these fictional, or is there any evidence of their existence? If there is any evidence of them, please share it.”
While Nishu Azad tagged Grok to confirm if there is any proof of the existence of Lord Hanuman, Ram or Krishna, Azad never used AI to question if Allah exists in reality or is fictional.
When it comes to Islamic festivals, her rationality goes into hibernation, as exemplified by this post in which she wrote, “Heartfelt congratulations to all of you on the month of Ramadan. May Allah accept all our prayers and keep love and brotherhood intact.”
Expressing her hatred for Brahmins during the UGC protests in March this year, Nishu Azad wrote, “Earth can’t bear Brahmins’ burden.” The story goes that Brahmins possess so much “divine energy” that they can’t sit directly on the ground—otherwise, the Earth would shake. Wow, what divine merit! But when it comes to rules, equality, and standards like UGC, that same “divine energy” suddenly vanishes. Greatness in myths, privilege in reality on the ground. #MeritMyth #CasteDebate”
As her Hinduphobic posts gained widespread attention, Nishu Azad behaved like a typical Islamo-leftist and declared all such posts as “fake and AI-created tweets”, even as the same posts are still publicly available.
OpIndia has highlighted earlier, how akin to Islamists, a section of people claiming to be ‘social justice’ activists, perceive women belonging to the Brahmin, Kshatriya and other Savarn Hindu groups as objects of pleasure, means of conquest and humiliation against the upper caste Hindus. For them, Brahmin or Kshatriya women are trophies they want to brandish to humiliate upper-caste men.
The hatred is so deep that even a minor girl like Nishu Azad celebrates this perverted mindset, as reflected in this post. “Brahmin girl Khushbu Pandey married a Dalit boy. The video is old but teaches a lot. Anyone who has faith in the Constitution and stays within its bounds can do anything.”
Indoctrination and weaponisation of children: The Islamo-leftist playbook of hate
While Nishu Azad is receiving criticism from the Hindu community for her display of the anti-Hindu mindset with impunity, there are bigger questions that need to be addressed. Who is indoctrinating children as young as 15 into a Hinduphobic political and ideological agenda, and why? Who is instilling deep hatred in these young minds against Hinduism and Hindu deities, so much so that these children are confusing Hinduphobia for progressiveness? Why drag children in issues too complex for their young minds?
Be it protests, viral abusive videos aimed at a sitting Prime Minister, or years of hateful, derogatory public posts against Hindu deities, positioning a 15-year-old at the centre of such charged ideological confrontations is quite evidently not organic child activism. It is an adult-directed political performance. Not only the CJP but the extended anti-BJP ecosystem platformed Nishu Azad, amplified her hateful content, and conveniently used her age and caste as a shield when backlash and legal action arrived.
During the infamous 2020 Shaheen Bagh anti-CAA sit-in, women and children were brought on the frontline to become the face of anti-CAA protests. The Islamo-leftists were using children as props for their agenda. Several children were seen raising inflammatory slogans and protesting in Shaheen Bagh.
Even during Muslim mob violence, in many cases, it has been seen how women and children are brought to the front to act as a shield. If the police or the targeted individuals retaliate with violence and end up hurting women and children, the original attackers get to play the victim card, and those who acted in self-defence become ‘inhuman villains who don’t spare even innocent women and children’.
Even during the recent Cockroach Janta Party protests, which drew large numbers of young people, held over alleged irregularities in competitive examinations, including the NEET paper leak, and demands for accountability from the government. It was seen how minor boys and girls, boasting their Gen-Z belonging, were at the forefront of hurling abuses at Brahmins, Hinduism, PM Modi, and even his deceased mother.
While ‘Brahminvad se Azadi’, ‘Modi ki Terhavi ka khana’, and other such derogatory remarks were being openly made, the organisers stayed one step removed, letting the children, high on their ‘we are Gen-Z revolutionaries’ delusion, deliver the most hateful and inflammatory statements.
Their abusive language and gestures were celebrated by the Islamo-leftist cabal as some cool and hilarious ‘resistance ’, and any criticism or police action was instantly framed as ‘harassing minors and Dalits’, backed by ‘Jab jab Modi darta hai, Police ko aage karta hai’ rhetoric.
This is akin to the Laughtivism core of the CJP’s foundation and activities, OpIndia analysed earlier. Under this method of anti-government protests, the agitators are asked to create a Backfire Effect, wherein the targeted government is trapped in such a way that all of its actions backfire on them only. If the government ignores jokes or memes, the movement gradually gains more space and grows. And if the government, angered by this, takes legal action or resorts to repression, it ends up appearing extremely cruel, intolerant, and cowardly.
Be it Delhi Police acting against violent protestors on 20th July or later the government accepting the demands of the CJP, both ways, the government was trapped in a lose-lose situation.
Be it anti-BJP politics, Ambedkarite atheism, anti-Hindu hate, or a blend of these three, the Islamo-leftists rely on indoctrinating youngsters into their adult venomous ideological projects, weaponise them to produce content, hurl invectives, and say things that would expose an adult activist to stronger legal and social costs. Once backlash and legal process knock on the door of these children, their ideological masters then invoke child-protection language, and the ‘children are too young to be subjected to legal scrutiny’ victim card.
There are many like this minor girl who have been indoctrinated into hating Hinduism, selectively targeting and insulting Hindu deities and scriptures. This indoctrination begins either at home, through social media or after coming in contact with adult adherents of ideologies that normalise abusing Hindu religion in the name of rationality, taking insensitive jibes at supposed ideological adversaries, and even celebrating the idea of their death.
The Narendra Modi-led NDA government has not gone out of power since 2014. Reason? Three consecutive electoral wins driven by voter support across all eligible age groups. The fact that the so-called Hindu nationalist government achieved near-invincibility in such a short time rattled the Islamo-leftist cabal.
This followed a multifaceted action plan: on one hand, political parties are casting aspersions on the integrity of the Election Commission of India and the transparency of the electoral process; on the other, the voter base of the BJP/NDA, especially middle-class parents, is being villainised, their intellect being questioned for simply voting for the Modi government.
After ‘Bhakt ka Chashma’ style mockery of the intellect of the pro-BJP voters backfired, the Islamo-leftist cabal intensified the radicalisation of young Gen Z minds, turning them against their own parents over political leanings.
In fact, it was seen during the CJP protests how several Gen Z participants gave interviews to leftist media portals and boasted that they had ‘confronted’ their ‘Modi-loving’ parents and even severed relations over ideological differences.
In recent times, confronting parents over their political views, recording these intense arguments, and broadcasting family clashes on social media has become some sort of badge of honour among a section of Gen Z youth.
Unable to comprehend how subtly and gradually they themselves have been indoctrinated into hating their own religion, culture, and in many cases, even their own country, these youngsters, in their delulu phase of romanticising communism and revolution, are villainising their own parents as ‘bigoted and brainwashed’.
This glorification of breaking families for political-ideological validation is best exemplified by the case of Neha Bora, the 29-year-old national president of the All-India Students’ Association (AISA).
In an interview with Barkha Dutt earlier this year, Bora opened up about her absolute ideological detachment from her parents, a serving Army officer father and a homemaker mother, both of whom support the BJP. Bora’s ‘rebellion’ against her own parents has not been called what it truly is: a tragic and destructive outcome of blind adherence to the Leftist ideology, but rather an inspirational act of courage for the supposed ‘higher purpose’ of resisting the ‘fascists’.
Under her leadership, AISA launched campaigns like “Cockroaches on the streets” and joined the CJP protests, where activists quickly shifted slogans from exam irregularities to demands for “Azadi” and political rhetoric. Such is the ideological influence that Bora has whitewashed anti-terror charges against figures like Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, calling them “ordinary students” subjected to ‘political prosecution’, while ignoring court observations regarding their roles in the 2020 anti-Hindu Delhi riots.
For any normal human being, family is way more important than any ideology or political cause; however, the leftist playbook is such that whoever gets influenced by it slips into a constant state of struggle and views everyone even slightly opposed to them as nothing short of enemies.
Since the family unit acts as a natural buffer, teaching children heritage, religious and traditional values, authority, and unconditional personal loyalty, Leftists encourage youngsters in their influence to either force their parents into aligning with them ideologically or completely detach from them, essentially declaring them ideologically adversarial.
Once the detachment is done, the party or leftist ideological collective steps in to replace the family, becoming their primary source of identity and belonging. This near-irreversible indoctrination aids the ultimate weaponisation for furthering the Leftist ideological causes.
In Nishu Azad’s case, however, her left-allied Ambedkarite father appears to be the major influence that drove her to indulge in anti-Hindu commentary and express extreme hate for the sitting Prime Minister of India.
Despite the minor girl’s track record of anti-Hindu commentary and activism, the leftist coterie, led by Congress’s Rahul Gandhi, and Chandrashekhar Azad of the Azad Samaj Party have openly backed her, rewarded her imprudent actions by glorifying her, further boosting her confidence that no matter what you do, as long as you are ideologically and politically useful, they will back you.
Similarly, a 15-year-old Noida teen, Ruchika Singh, who gained national attention during the CJP protests for hurling abuses at PM Modi and his deceased mother, apologised after criticism. However, she soon published a fresh video, issuing a defiant message. She accused PM Modi of ‘harassing’ her so much that she has nothing to lose anymore.
Singh received support from Aam Aadmi Party supremo Arvind Kejriwal, who, instead of condemning Singh’s derogatory remarks, chose to back her, declaring her uncouth behaviour and subsequent portrayal of herself as a ‘victim ’ as an act of ‘bravery’.
First, children are indoctrinated, then weaponised for a political agenda, and once these youngsters demonstrate their usefulness, the left-liberal ideological coterie jumps in to shield them with ‘they are just children’ arguments and ‘fascist government is harassing Gen-Z’ to paint the ideological adversary, the Modi government in the present case, as an oppressive regime that harasses children to silence dissent.
