Indian judiciary

Both Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam are facing serious charges of divisive speeches, inciting violence, and engaging in anti-national conspiracies. The courts are examining the evidence and following due process. But this is unacceptable to the left-liberal cabal.

Manusmriti was a foundational Dharmashastra for pre-modern and colonial jurists, but it was never the only or final word.

Clearly, facts or the legality of the Supreme Court's observations take a backseat when they do not serve the set agendas of the Left Liberal cabal.

The High Court refused to accept the petitioner's argument that he mentioned the name of his wife in the application form, and therefore, it should be presumed that he has only one wife.

The Telangana High Court ruled that a Muslim woman can end her marriage through khula without needing her husband's consent or a certificate from any religious authority, making it a legally valid and self-executing form of divorce.

The Justice Varma incident, whatever its outcome, highlights the need for reform, not to condemn, but to preserve.

The executive's attempts to introduce judicial reforms and increase accountability of judges have yielded no results. When an inquiry is commenced, it is carried out by other judges based on a framework they have set up, resulting in lingering uncertainties and a severe lack of desired impartiality and transparency. This privilege is not extended to anyone else. The judiciary requires and enforces standards of transparency and integrity from everyone except itself.

Stephen Sackur voiced his lack of faith in the Indian institutions regarding the country's second largest majority.

Rahul Gandhi said that he has been sitting in the system from the inside since the day he was born and the system is aligned against the lower castes

In April this year, the Karnataka HC refused to dismiss a criminal case against the director of a private company and his wife, who was accused of using pepper spray on a man in self-defence.