Maharashtra Assembly elections 2024

Two FIRs have been filed against psephologist Sanjay Kumar in Nagpur and Nashik after he shared incorrect voter roll data on social media.

When the Maharashtra Assembly Election results are compared to the Lok Sabha elections held just five months ago, the victory becomes even more impressive.

This comes almost a month after the CIDCO had assured action against the illegal dargah that was posing a potential threat to national security as complained by the local Hindu activists. The Dargah notably was located on the CIDCO property near the upcoming Navi Mumbai International Airport site.

The accused person shot the video while inside the polling booth and exposed that he voted for Shiv Sena (UBT) candidate Dilip Sopal. As per OpIndia sources, the voter who shot the video and posted it on social media has been identified as Rutwik Pawar.

However, as Shamita Yadav aka Ranting Gola published a ‘clarification’ video over her rant against Abu Azmi, many raised questions about her conduct and questioned if she makes videos targeting politicians only for money.

Taking to X, Abu Azmi shared a video of his meeting with Mufti Salman Azhari and said, "Today, I had a special meeting with Mufti Salman Azhari and discussed the issues of Govandi. Namoos-e-Risalat is our mission, our demand is that an anti-terror law should be made against anyone who disrespects the evening of the Prophet (peace be upon him), and we will not rest until this law is made."

While campaigning for her husband Fahad Ahmad, Bhaskar tried to woo Muslim voters claiming that no religion or caste is barrier to respecting Prophet Muhammad.

The money laundering case stems from a Malegaon Police FIR filed last week against a local trader named Siraj Ahmed Harun Meman, who runs a tea and cold drinks agency apart from some of his associates.

"Whether or not it is an old video, with Mr Pawar you have an ideological difference and you are fighting against him. Then you should try to stand up on your own legs,” Justice Kant said.

Justice Chandiwal said that his report nowhere made the mention of clean chit and indicated that a different outcome might have been possible had the evidence been produced.