Academics protest over proposal to consider that India didn’t exist at all before 1947

In a typical case of American imperialist hubris of rewriting the world’s history, a small group of South Asia Studies faculties recently asked The California Board of Education to change the “history of social science frameworks” syllabus causing the word “India” to be removed and replaced with “South Asia”, as they believe India did not exist before 1947.

This proposal has been met with indignation and incredulity by Indian academics the world over. Prof Vamsee Juluri a professor of Media Studies at the University of San Francisco has taken up the cause on behalf of all those who find this rewrite unwarranted and politically motivated.

Prof Juluri asked in his letter – “If this is indeed correct that ‘India’ is not an accurate term for India before 1947, how is it possible that the word ‘India’ has been in usage in some form or another from the time of the ancient Greeks and Romans? Did Columbus go searching for ‘South Asia’? Are the islands of the Caribbean Sea called the ‘West South Asianes’ instead of the ‘West Indies’? Was it the British East ‘South Asia’ Company that led colonial trade and exploitation? Was it the ‘South Asian Ocean’ which constituted the centre of the world’s largest trade network before the rise of the modern Europe? Do you write, perhaps, with ‘South Asian’ ink?”

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

The new draft was issued in last fall, and the two sides have been battling it out since then.

“Indian-Americans are a successful community, well settled in American life and creating companies and jobs, building bridges with the new and old country through culture and business, and yet we have only recently woken up with a start to realize that we don’t own our history. In California, and even in India, 68 years after independence, we were still being taught a repackaged version of scholarship that was current in, say, the 1890s!” Prof Juluri wrote in a statement on Teaching Approaches and Experiences he submitted to the California board.

Many experts in the know argue that this change is aimed at diluting India’s position in the region.

This is not for the first time that such a controversy has erupted in California. Around 11 years ago, many academics and activists had objected to the portrayal of Hindus and history of Hinduism in textbooks. There were academic protests, and even a lawsuit last time. This time, people are speaking up through an online petition.

Prof Juluri has put up the online petition asking the CBE to reconsider their decision and it has already gathered more than 10000 signatures in a short period of time. Many prominent historians and indologists have signed the petition and the same is getting widely circulated in various social media platforms.

In response to an email sent by this author, Prof Juluri mentioned that he is also undertaking a separate scholarly outreach for the same issue, and will put up the letter sent to them in media soon.

For those who wish to read about it and sign the petition please click on this link.

Share and Support:
Support OpIndia by paying for content

Most read articles recently

Here is why BJP lost elections, and of course, it was deliberate

What BJP supporters need to realise is this - no political party ever wants to lose and least of all, a party led by the two most politically aggressive politicians the country has ever seen.

India cannot turn into Islamic Nation, only Modi can understand gravity and do needful: Meghalaya HC

There should be uniform law for all Indian citizens, and anybody opposing the Indian laws and constitution cannot be considered as citizens of the country, Meghalaya High Court noted

‘Will not develop areas which did not vote for me’: Rajasthan Congress MLA shortly after winning

Rajender Singh Bidhuri fought and won a close battle against BJP MLA Suresh Dhakad with a margin of 1661 votes.

BJP’s real woes: Lessons from the electoral semi-finals

The prolonged silence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP President Amit Shah on election results was very telling. The results were clearly unexpected and possibly led to prolonged internal discussions on the future course of action.

Ranchi: Court summons Rahul Gandhi for his defamatory remarks against Amit Shah

The petitioner submitted that the statement by Rahul Gandhi against Amit Shah had hurt his sentiments and tarnished the image of the party.
It is time for Congress and Gandhi Family mukt Bharat

Why Congress-mukt Bharat is still very much in progress

It is time BJP supporters understand the meaning of the term 'Congress-mukt Bharat'.

Can the BJP satisfy its online supporters? If only it were Congress

BJP supporters online, also known as the ‘right wing’, are first to attack the party and write it off after electoral setbacks.

BJP may be weaker than it was in 2014, but Congress is not as strong as projected either

If Congress has not forgotten the 1996 elections, they would very well know they are on a sticky wicket here.

Mayawati extends support to Congress for Madhya Pradesh, may consider Rajasthan ‘to keep BJP out of power’

She said to defeat BJP in Rajasthan, too, BSP will extend support to Congress.

Priyanka Gandhi part of selection process of Congress CM in the state where her husband faces probe

Priyanka Gandhi's husband, Robert Vadra, was recently summoned for the third time by the Enforcement Directorate in the Bikaner land deal money laundering case after he missed the first two.

Latest articles

Connect with us

125,598FansLike
97,697FollowersFollow
6,062SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these