Home News Reports Women Army officers to get the promotions and benefits due to them, a bold and much awaited step by MoD

Women Army officers to get the promotions and benefits due to them, a bold and much awaited step by MoD

Defense Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has taken a major step providing much-awaited relief to women Army Officers. On 29 January 2018, the Ministry of Defense withdrew its appeals against a 2012 Armed Forces Tribunal decision setting aside the denial of promotions and benefits to Short Service and Women Officers commissioned before 2006.

A Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice of India Deepak Mishra heard the plea by the Ministry of Defense stating that the issue had been resolved and the Ministry would withdraw its case against the women officers. Lawyer Aishwarya Bhati represented several women officers in this case.

In 2004, the Government of India had accepted promotions of army officers at two, six and 13 years of service to the ranks of Captain, Major and Lieutenant Colonel. Though the promotions were to apply to all commissioned officers, later the benefit was denied to Short Service and women officers. Due to a contentious interpretation by the Army, several short service and women officers were denied promotion to the ranks of Captain, Major and Lt Colonel. Their junior officers, who became eligible after 2006, were granted all these benefits as per the 2004-recommendations of the Ajai Vikram Singh (AVS) Committee, according to reports.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

The Short Service scheme was changed from 5+5+4 years system to 10+4 years system in 2006. After that, the benefit was extended to officers opting for the new scheme. This resulted in a sharp disparity among officers who were denied promotions and benefits because senior officers were retired as substantive Lieutenants and Captains while their juniors could reach the Lieutenant Colonel-rank. According to a report, the women officers and SSC officers affected negatively by this decision filed a petition against this move in the Armed Forces Tribunal. The Armed Forces Tribunal had struck down this discriminatory move but the then MoD under the UPA government, had moved to the Supreme Court against the Tribunal’s decision.

It was only in 2015 that an expert panel set by the MoD (then headed by Mr Manohar Parrikar) recommended the withdrawal of the appeal, and said that such unnecessary litigation was due to an “a self-created negative interpretation even when the scheme had been approved for all officers by the Cabinet.”

The decision taken by The Ministry of Defence has been welcomed by experts.

While a historic wrong has been rectified today, one must also pause to ask why the previous government had moved the Supreme Court against the Tribunal’s decision to strike down this discriminatory move.

Sharing is caring - Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

Two AAP MLAs lunged towards Kejriwal and one punched him such that his glasses fell off, claims Kapil Mishra

AAP MLAs reportedly beat up Kejriwal so much that he has injured his knees and could not walk properly

Air Vistara senior officials visit Gen GD Bakshi, apologise for deleting the tweet honouring him

Sanjiv Kapoor, Chief Strategy & Commercial Officer, and Deepa Chadha, Senior Vice President – Human Resources & Corporate Affairs or Air Vistara visited Maj. Gen. Bakshi and tendered an official apology

AltNews co-founder caught shielding Islamists following the Sri Lanka terror attacks

Altnews cofounder seems to have graduated from sharing fake news himself to shielding radical Islamists

‘For five seconds, I was shocked. I was very angry,’ Sumitra Mahajan on Rahul Gandhi’s infamous wink

"But when he returned to his seat, started speaking again and winked, I was very angry. I said this is not proper. Actually, the hugging was not proper either. But this was a step too much," Sumitra Mahajan said.

Cambridge University confirms that Rahul Gandhi did his M.Phil using the name Raul Vinci

Cambridge University confirms that Rahul Gandhi did his MPhil using the name Raul Vinci

Non-bailable warrant issued against Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and Yogendra Yadav in a defamation case

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate issued non-bailable warrants as Kejriwal, Sisodia and Yadav were not present during the hearings of the case

‘Liberals’ addressing Yogi Adityanath by his birth name is a reflection of their deep seated Hinduphobia

The elevation of Yogi Adityanath to the seat of Chief Minister of India's most populous state ruffled many feathers and it's hardly surprising that they are throwing everything at him in the desperate hope that something will stick.

Rahul Gandhi talks while PM Modi delivers the Make In India promise: Apple to shift mass production of iPhones from China to India

While Bengaluru unit of Apple was already manufacturing older models, the new facility will manufacture newer phones

Justice Gogoi, the ‘plot’ and the things you might not know

Indian Express also does a quick job on Attorney General K.K. Venugopal. It says the AG wanted the day’s proceedings to receive “widest publicity” even as CJI wanted the “media to show restraint.”

Latest articles

Connect with us

157,164FansLike
130,084FollowersFollow
54,564SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these

Sharing is caring - Share This Post and Support: