HomeLawEnforcement Directorate attaches Robert Vadra's assets worth Rs 4.62 crore in Bikaner Land Scam...

Enforcement Directorate attaches Robert Vadra’s assets worth Rs 4.62 crore in Bikaner Land Scam case

Robert Vadra is facing probe in land scam, money laundering and other cases

In a major development in the Bikaner Land Scam case, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has attached the assets of Robert Vadra’s company M/s Sky Light Hospitality (P) Ltd worth Rs 4.62 crore. The official Twitter account of ED informed that assets of Sky Light and others have been attached in the case.


Last week, Robert Vadra had appeared at the ED office for questioning, after he had ignored several summons issued by the agency.

In April last year, ED had attached the properties of Vadra’ aide Jaiprakash Bagarwa in connection with the Bikaner Land Scam case. In the Bikaner Land Scam case, land was allegedly allotted in the name of non-existent individuals by the State government officials in collusion with some fraudulent individuals including some real estate developers.

Vadra also has a criminal case registered against him under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) for Vadra owned Sky Light Hospitality had allegedly bought a piece of land in Kolayat and Bikaner for cheap and sold the same at an extremely high premium through illegal transactions.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Madhya Pradesh HC rules that Bhojshala is a Saraswati Temple: Read about the archaeological, historical, scientific and administrative reasons cited in the landmark verdict

The High Court declared the disputed area a Bhojshala with Saraswati Temple, quashed the restrictive portions of the 2003 ASI order, and mandated the creation of a trust for temple administration and Sanskrit education

Arvind Kejriwal and his lackeys are lying, again: Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma didn’t ‘recuse’ herself, she transferred the case because she initiated contempt proceedings....

This episode focuses on a pattern, the weaponisation of public pressure against state institutions, particularly the judiciary. When people with large social media followings launch coordinated campaigns to delegitimise sitting judges, manufacture or manipulate evidence, and publicly refuse to participate in the judicial process, they are not practising Satyagraha. They are systematically undermining public trust in institutions that safeguard ordinary people far more than politicians.
- Advertisement -