Tuesday, July 5, 2022
HomeSpecialsOpIndia ExplainsOn this day in 1947, Congress agreed to the partition of undivided India to...

On this day in 1947, Congress agreed to the partition of undivided India to form ‘New India’ and Pakistan

The Congress and its associates to date, fail to believe that the two-nation theory was first promulgated by Syed Ahmad Khan, the founder of the Aligarh Muslim University, and not Veer Savarkar.

The partition of India is one of the greatest horrors inflicted on India that haunts every Indian even today. Back in 1947, at least a million Hindus were killed during the mass migration after partition and millions had to give away their assets, and later millions of Hindus suffered the pain of loss of their dear ones at the hands of Islamists.

So what led to the partition and the horrors that came with it.

75 years ago today the ‘nationalist’ Congress party along with MK Gandhi approved the plan of dividing the Bharat into two sovereign entities- India and Pakistan, to maintain its basic ‘secular nationalist’ character. What we know today is that the then-political leaders believed that partition was necessary, but what we don’t know is that one belief that led to the so-called political separation of Bharat.

Many people to date believe that India was divided due to political differences. But the fact remains though ignored by so-called ‘liberals’ that it was Islamist religious fear and the ‘secular’ character of the Congress party that led to the partition of undivided India into two countries. Islamists’ sham religious fears were pat touched by the Congress which believed (believes) in the code of ‘secularism’! In most countries, secularism means the non-recognition of every religion, but in India, sadly it meant the recognition and pampering one one particular religion.

Islamists called for separate nation since the 19th century

Partition was inevitable as believed by the then leaders, but understanding what led to the decision is important. The Pakistan Movement was started by those who were educated at Aligarh Muslim University and they sought another country to ‘protect’ the identity of Islam. The Congress and its associates to date, fail to believe that the two-nation theory was first promulgated by Syed Ahmad Khan, the founder of the Aligarh Muslim University, and not Veer Savarkar.

In 1876, Khan had said that Hindus and Muslims could never become one nation as their religion and way of life were quite distinct. Seven years later, he voiced similar sentiments. He said, “Friends, in India, there live two prominent nations which are distinguished by the names of Hindus and Mussalmans…To be a Hindu or a Muslim is a matter of internal faith that has nothing to do with mutual relationships and external conditions…Hence, leave God’s share to God and concern yourself with the share that is yours…India is the home of both of us…By living so long in India, the blood of both has changed.”

Syed Ahmed Khan, founder of Aligarh Muslim University (Image Source- Dialogue Pakistan)

Further, twelve years later, he stated that if the British community and the army were to leave India, taking with them all their cannons and their splendid weapons and all else, Hindus and Muslims could not sit on the same throne to rule this one nation. “Is it possible that under these circumstances two nations—the Mohammedans and the Hindus—could sit on the same throne and remain equal in power? Most certainly not. One of them must conquer the other. To hope that both could remain equal is to desire the impossible and the inconceivable. But until one nation has conquered the other and made it obedient, peace cannot reign in the land.”

Further, in the year 1906, the Muslim members of the then Congress party formed the All India Muslim League claiming that they were not respected as much as the Hindu leaders in the party. Later in the year 1930, one of the members of the newly formed Muslim League, Allama Iqbal placed his demand for a separate state for Muslims. He thought that a separate Muslim state was important in a Hindu-dominated India.

Jinnah, who had striven for the Hindu-Muslim unity earlier, also began to feel insecure about the claimed ‘dreadful condition’ of the minorities in India and blamed Congress for being unfair to the Muslims. The Muslim League under the leadership of Jinnah then drafted a resolution to form a new Islamic state.

In the year 1940, Jinnah, at the Lahore conference, advanced his call for a separate nation. Though the definition of Pakistan was not clear until 1940, Jinnah’s opinion powered many Muslim leaders to quit Congress and join Muslim League to support the two-nation theory.

By 1946, the Cabinet Mission tried to solve the issue by proposing a decentralized state instead of the idea of a separate nation named Pakistan. But neither of the proposals was accepted by the Islamic Party, the Muslim League as Jinnah remained adamant on his idea of a separate nation for Muslims. Also, Congress’s Nehru then refused to agree to a decentralized state in which substantial powers would be given to local governments.

Congress approved the ‘3rd June’ plan

On February 20, 1947, Clement Attlee, the then British Prime Minister, declared that the British would quit India by 30th June 1948. The declaration by Attlee meant that a deadline was already fixed for the transfer of power even if the Indian politicians had not agreed on a constitution. On the other hand, the Muslim League led by Jinnah had boycotted the Constituent Assembly after his call for a separate country (Pakistan) was rejected by the Cabinet Mission.

The process of injecting the fear of ‘threat to Islamism’ in the minds of Islamists by Islamists themselves had begun back in the 19th century. Jinnah’s Islamist party believed that Muslims in Bharat were under threat and that there was a need for a separate nation for Mohammedans. Jinnah had also given the ‘direct action‘ call to the Islamists wanting for Pakistan to take matters into their own hands for the creation of Pakistan out of undivided India.

After a series of continuous genocide of Hindus, the Islamists won only after the ‘secular’ Congress Party failed to stop violence and negotiate a better deal over Pakistan. They (Congress leaders) eventually sensed the ‘plight’ of the Islamists and accepted the Mountbatten Plan on June 15, 1947. This is days after, Lord Mountbatten, the last Viceroy of India, announced a ‘key’ to the political and constitutional deadlock created by the refusal of the Muslim League to join the Constituent Assembly which was posed to frame the Constitution of India.

Nehru(L), Mountbatten (C) and Jinnah (R) at conference table (Image source- Rediffmail.com)

On June 3, 1947, Mountbatten was able to bring leaders of both, the Indian National Congress and the Muslim League around a conference table, where they collectively endorsed Mountbatten’s plan also known as the ‘3rd June’ plan. The new plan was accepted by both sides, Congress and the Muslim League, paving the way for the partition in less than 6 hours. Under this plan, the British had agreed to immediately transfer power to two successor authorities and the plan envisaged dividing British India into two dominions – India and Pakistan on a territorial-cum-communal basis. The idea of Mountbatten was to divide India but to retain maximum unity, to which the Congress Party had readily agreed.

However, hinting at partition on February 20 itself, Attlee had stated in its statement that the British paramountcy on the princely states would lapse with the transfer of power and that it would not be transferred to ‘any successor government’. The League’s position on the creation of Pakistan was tactically conceded by the Indian National Congress in exchange for the Congress’s position on the unity of the future Indian state, especially on not granting independence to princely states, but being a given to choice to join either India or Pakistan. The idea was to keep Pakistan as small as possible.

Congress had earlier rejected the ‘secretive’ plan

Lord Mountbatten was sent to India by George VI, the then King of the United Kingdom and the Emperor of British India in March 1947. He was asked to liquidate the British empire and quit India as soon as possible with a deadline issued until June 1948. But he wanted to return to Britain to advance his naval career as the earliest. So, he decided to prepone the transfer of power by ten months, to August 1947, and for this, he chalked out several plans and held long discussions with Congress and the Muslim League leaders.

Jinnah’s call for ‘direct action’ and Congress’s failed attempts to avoid violence obviously had Jinnah’s rising hand in influencing Mountbatten. In the wake of increasing communal riots in the country, he asked Ismay, his Chief of Staff, to prepare a plan for the transfer of power to responsible hands and the division of the country. It was discussed that the entire plan was to be kept secretive, and none of the parties in India should have any information before the plan was finalised.

However, Nehru who was staying with Mountbatten as a guest at his residence at Simla looked at the plan and rejected it in its entirety. Later a Boundary Commission headed by Sir Cyril Radcliffe was constituted by the British government and tasked to delineate the boundaries between India and Pakistan. Radcliffe who had never been to India in the past was assigned to create artificial boundaries between the two countries.

Congress’s Nehru with Lord Mountbatten and his family in Shimla (Image source- DailyO)

Mountbatten went to London, where he got approved the plan without any alteration. Attlee and his cabinet approved in a meeting that lasted not more than five minutes. On May 31, Mountbatten returned to India and met the Indian leaders, including Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Patel, Acharya Kripalani, and Mohammad Ali Jinnah, Liaqat Ali, and Baldev Singh. After both Congress and Muslim League leaders approved the plan without raising any objections, Mountbatten discussed it with MK Gandhi and convinced him saying partition was the best plan under the circumstances.

Why did MK Gandhi accept partition?

While many people staunchly claim that MK Gandhi was against the Partition of India, it was he who later supported the Congress, putting the blame of partition on the Hindu and Sikh community as well. “The Congress never asked for it. But Congress can feel the pulse of the people. It realized that the Khalsa as also the Hindus asked for it”, he was quoted.

Among many prime reasons for MK Gandhi to accept the proposal of partition of India, he chose to accept it only after taking into consideration the ‘pulse of people’. As the Britishers hurriedly prepared for their exit from India, they chose not to interfere in the ongoing communal violences and instead use the situation to execute their pre-planned exit.

Reportedly, Gandhi had at first proposed to make Jinnah as an interim Prime Minister of the country. He had made an attempt to satisfy Jinnah’s long standing ambition to establish power and hence kept him away from his insistence on Pakistan. But, later Gandhi himself withdrew the offer as Jinnah had earlier rejected one similar proposal. It is Gandhi in the end who saw no option but to approve the partition of country.

MK Gandhi addressing the masses (Image source- Hindustan Times)

To note, Gandhi was also of opinion that there was nothing wrong on their (Muslims) part to demand Pakistan as they could never live where the Hindus had always been in majority. “They are harming themselves by making this demand and I pray to God to save them in time from any harm coming to them,” he had said after meeting the Viceroy on June 4.

Later in September 1947, after the partition, Gandhi also began showering his worries for Pakistan and the Muslims of Delhi. He claimed that Muslims were not safe in Delhi. He met Maulana Azad and laid down some conditions in favor of Islamists. He demanded that the annual fair (Urs) should be organized peacefully at Khwaja Bakhtiyar Dargah of Mehrauli. He also demanded that the 100 mosques in Delhi that have been converted into refugee camps – be brought back to their former status.

Apart from this, he demanded free movement of Muslims in Old Delhi. Non-Muslims should not object to Muslims returning from Pakistan. Muslims should travel fearlessly in trains. Economic boycott of Muslims should not be done. And Hindu refugees should be settled in the territory of Muslims only if they get permission from Muslims. Gandhi also blackmailed the then Government of India to lend Rs 55 crores to Pakistan.

India attained independence on August 15, 1947, at the cost of millions of lives and brutal riots between Hindus and Muslims. People left behind their homes and all that they owned in fear of communal violence. Crores walked miles to their newly promised homeland. While Indian Muslims left for their newly created home of Pakistan, Hindus and Sikhs who were in what is now Pakistan were forced to move to India. And the rest is history!

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Siddhi Somani
Siddhi Somani
Siddhi Somani is known for her satirical and factual hand in Economic, Social and Political writing. Having completed her post graduation in Journalism, she is pursuing her Masters in Politics. The author meanwhile is also exploring her hand in analytics and statistics. (Twitter- @sidis28)

Related Articles

Trending now

Recently Popular

- Advertisement -

Connect with us

255,564FansLike
592,173FollowersFollow
27,500SubscribersSubscribe