Thursday, April 9, 2026
HomeNews ReportsReal-life Jolly LLB: Judge tells Somnath Bharti that his petition against Bansuri Swaraj is...

Real-life Jolly LLB: Judge tells Somnath Bharti that his petition against Bansuri Swaraj is full of typos, cant understand what the petition says

The Delhi High Court judge pointed out that the petition filed by Somnath Bharti had made references to Respondent No.4 although there was none in the memo of parties.

In an embarrassing development on Monday (22nd July), the Delhi High Court came down heavily on Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Somnath Bharti after he filed an error-ridden petition against BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj.

Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora of the Delhi High Court noted, “Your petition is full of typographical errors. I can’t issue notice because I don’t understand anything.”

He pointed out that the petition filed by Somnath Bharti had made references to Respondent No.4 although there was none in the memo of parties.

Before adjourning the matter to 13th August this year, the Delhi High Court ruled, “It is full of mistakes. There are too many mistakes. You will have to correct the petition first. I can’t issue notice because I can’t understand… I will adjourn and you file a corrected petition.”

For the unversed, Somnath Bharti had filed a petition against Bansuri Swaraj after losing by a margin of 78,370 votes from the New Delhi Lok Sabha constituency. He had alleged election malpractice and levelled corruption charges against the BJP MP.

Bharti claimed that a politician named Raaj Anand Kumar, who was fielded by the BSP from the New Delhi Lok Sabha constituency, was working on the behest of the BJP and against AAP.

The embarrassing development in the Delhi High Court today is reminiscent of the 2013 film ‘Jolly LLB’ wherein Judge Sundar Lal Tripathy reprimanded advocate Jagdish Tyagi for filing a typo-ridden Public Interest Litigation (PIL).

“You have written appeal as ‘apple’ in this PIL. Not only that, you have written ‘prosecution’ as prostitution. There are at least 5 mistakes in each line. (You did not do due diligence) and just filed a PIL,” the iconic dialogue of the movie reads.

In a similar fashion, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora of the Delhi High Court rapped petitioner Somnath Bharati, who coincidentally happens to be a lawyer by occupation, for filing a petition riddled with typos.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Ceasefire yet to take effect? Kuwait, UAE being hit by Iranian missiles, Israel strikes Lebanon while Trump dreams of making ‘big money’ at the...

The ceasefire is falling apart within hours of its announcement. Israel refuses to acknowledge a key point in Iran’s peace proposal and attacks Lebanon. Trump claims there will be no Uranium enrichment in Iran, while Iran maintains that it has “forced” the US to accept its 10-point plan and that any lasting peace would hinge on sweeping concessions outlined in its proposal.

Islamists and liberals play victim about ‘Muslim names’ being deleted from electoral rolls: How illegal migration is the highest in Bengal, and how their...

Initially, the EC deleted 58.25 lakh voters who were found to be deceased, absent, shifted, or had duplicate entries in the draft rolls published last December.
- Advertisement -