Home Blog Page 1995

White House distances itself from Obama’s comments on India twice in 3 days, official says Obama made the remarks as private citizen

A week after former US president Barack Obama made highly controversial comments on India during PM Modi’s US visit, the White House has distanced itself from the comments. In a press briefing and a media interview, the White House officials refused to comment on Obama’s comments, terming them the opinions of the private citizen.

During a State Department press briefing on 26 June, a journalist had asked that while the president (Obama) had remarked about Muslims and other minorities India, the joint statement issued after the meeting between PM Modi and President Biden didn’t mention it. To it, State Department Spokesperson Matthew Miller replied that they regularly raise concerns about human rights in our conversations with Indian officials. He pointed out that Biden had spoken himself in the joint press conference that he held with Prime Minister Modi.

The spokesperson seemed to be confused about the question as the journalist mentioned only the ‘president’, and he assumed it was about Biden. Therefore, another journalist clarified that the question was former President Obama, adding that there has been quite a bit of response in India to that. The journalist then added Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma’s reaction to Obama’s comments, saying, “there was a social media post by the chief minister of the state of Assam, who is an ally of Prime Minister Modi, using quite insulting language about former-President Obama.  Is that something that the United States wants to comment on.”

However, the State Department spokesperson refused to comment on it, replying with, “No, no, I don’t think so.”

In an interview with CNN, Obama had said that President Biden should mention the “protection of Muslim minority in a majority Hindu India” in his meeting with PM Modi. He had added that had he met PM Modi, he would have told him, “if you do not protect the rights of minorities, then there is a strong possibility that India at some point starts pulling apart…That would be contrary to the interests of India.”

Obama’s comments were met with strong objections in India, with several top BJP leaders responding to it, and even reminding how large number of Muslim countries were attacked and bombed by US during Obama’s regime.

However, opposition and left-liberals were having a field day, celebrating comments of Obama against India. When The Wire journalist tried to taunt the Assam govt over the issue by suggesting that Assam police should go to DC to arrest Barrack, Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma commented there are many enemies in India who will be dealt with first before going to foreign countries. He said, “There are many Hussain Obama in India itself. We should prioritize taking care of them before considering going to Washington. The Assam police will act according to our own priorities.”

Expectedly, these comments of the senior BJP leader and CM were widely criticised by the left-liberal ecosystem, including many foreign journalists. However, from the comments of the state department spokesperson, it is clear that they do not find it necessary to react to the comments of the Assam CM.

After that, Hindustan Times talked to a senior administrative official of the White House on the issue, who completely distanced the administration from Obama’s comments. The official said that Obama made the comments on his own as a private citizen, and there was coordination with the White House. When asked if the speculation of US playing “good cop-bad cop” with the opposite stands taken by the current and former presidents, the official said that they have enormous regard for Obama, “But he is a private citizen, and there was no coordination on what he said.”

The official added that every relevant issue was raised during Modi-Biden meeting, saying that Biden’s style is to do it with great dignity, to treat partners with respect and to engage in the spirit of a close partnership. He said that just like Biden had issues to raise, Modi also had few issues that he wanted to raise.

“I can tell you that the depth of their relationship allowed them to talk about issues respectfully and in a way that I’m confident that the other heard it and heard it in a spirit of respect,” the official said.

The official however reiterated its support for WSJ reporter Sabrina Siddiqui who asked a controversial question to PM Modi in Washington DC. “We have made very clear that we believe free and open press is important. We frankly do not support any kind of online harassment. And indeed it concerns us greatly,” he said.

It is notable that White House has come out strongly in support of Sabrina Siddiqui after she was criticised for her propaganda-laden question to Modi.

Sabrina had asked what steps PM Modi and his government are willing to take to protect the rights of Muslims and other minorities and to uphold free speech. In response, PM Modi had given a befitting reply by saying that India is a democracy, and both India and America have democracy in their DNA. “Democracy is our spirit, democracy flows in our veins. We live in a democracy and our ancestors have put that into words in the shape of the Constitution and our government runs on the basis of the Constitution which is based on the basic democratic values,” he had said, making it clear that every citizen is treated equally in India, regardless of religion.

After that, the reporter was criticised in India as it was evident that it was not a question, but an attempt to spread the propaganda that Muslims are under attack in India. But the White House has come in her support, asserting that the administration supports freedom of the press. On 26 June, NSC Coordinator for Strategic Communications John Kirby and Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre condemned the “harassment” of Wall Street Journal’s Sabrina Siddiqui.

On the other hand, critics of PM Narendra Modi are using her comments to further target the union government, as it bolsters their propaganda that Muslims are under attack in India and the govt needs to do more for Muslims. However, it is clear that the White House has no comments to make on that claim. Their support is only for the freedom of speech and freedom of the press to ask questions, and they opposed the alleged social media trolling targeting her. Their defence of Sabrina is a standard defence of press freedom, a standard objection to alleged online harassment, and was not linked to what she tried to imply with her question. They made no reference to the subject matter of the question.

Similarly, the US administration has distanced itself from the comments of ex-president Obama, which are backed by the same propaganda, that Muslims are being targeted in India under the Narendra Modi government. While the state department refused to comment on his remarks, the top official said that those were his personal remarks and White House has nothing to do with them.

This makes it clear that the White House does not do or say anything that can hamper diplomatic relations with India.

Badaun: Ammar Qureshi threatens to convert a girl and her family using her pictures and videos, case registered

In a fresh case of love jihad in UP’s Badaun, a complaint was registered against a Muslim man for pressurising, threatening, and attempting to convert a Hindu girl to Islam.

According to the family, the Hindu girl was trapped in a relationship by Ammar Qureshi who allegedly blackmailed her by threatening to make her images and videos viral. He also threatened the girl’s two sisters saying that he would wed them to Muslim men and convert them to Islam.

Qureshi threatened the girl saying that as soon as she turned 18, he would convert her to Islam. A complaint has been filed under sections 354 (K), 352, 504, and 506 and against religious conversion under sections 3 and 4.

The love jihad case against Ammar Qureshi

Ammar Qureshi had been pressurising the Hindu girl, the daughter of a temple priest, for a year to convert. He would use the position of his father, Hasan Mahmood who worked in the CJM court, to threaten the girl and her family. Despite the family’s numerous appeals, Qureshi did not stop. According to the girl’s sister, when they confronted his parents, they said they knew nothing.

On Wednesday, Qureshi told the girl to meet him at a local restaurant. After the girl had been gone a long time, the family set out to search for her and found her at the restaurant. The family caught hold of Qureshi and handed him over to the police.

The family said Qureshi also threatened to damage their image in society using the images and videos of the girl. The family has demanded that Qureshi be jailed and action be taken in all such cases of love jihad.

Bihar: Muslim ex-boyfriend’s family assaults Hindu girl’s family with bricks and stones in Hajipur, police says no communal angle

On 27 June, in the Vaishali district in Hajipur, Bihar, a Muslim family reportedly tried to force a Hindu girl into marriage and assaulted her family. As per Times Now Navbharat, her family was attacked twice, initially with bricks and stones, and later when they were taken to a hospital by the police for their treatment. Five people including her brother and a police personnel suffered injuries as a result of the assault.

The instance is Fatehabad village which falls under the Hajipur police station and is at a distance of 3 to 4 kilometers from the city. The Hindu family had sent their daughter to a relative’s house out of fear. According to them, the accused was constantly harassing their daughter and even threatened to shoot the boy with whom the girl was scheduled to get married. On 27 June, the Muslim side attacked the girl’s family and assaulted them with bricks and stones. Now, police are deployed in large numbers in the area to maintain order and peace.

However, when OpIndia contacted the area’s Sub-Divisional Police Officer (SDPO), he refuted all charges of love jihad and denied any communal angle as well. He claimed, “News reports are lying and trying to create a rift in the society on the occasion of Eid al-Adha. There is no love jihad. Media only wants to increase their TRP. We have already released a statement about the same. This is a personal matter between the families and there is no communal angle to it.”

He also alleged that the girl was in a relationship with the Muslim boy for the last two years and he had gone to her house before Eid where he was beaten by the former’s family after which his side retaliated and attacked her family. “All of this occurred on 27 and media is running the news today,” he complained and added, “There is no law and order issue in the region.”

Vaishali Police also released a statement today offering clarification on the incident. It stated that the reason for the conflict was personal and a case has been registered against both families. It read, “Ten people from each side have been arrested. It is not a communal occurrence. The incident has been misrepresented as a communal one during Eid by news and social media. This is an effort to incite conflict between the communities. Those who engage in such practices will face strict action.”

Uttar Pradesh: Abu Talha, son of former BSP MLA, arrested for insulting Goddess Sita, hurting Hindu sentiments on social media

On Wednesday, the Uttar Pradesh Police arrested Abu Talha Pathan, son of former Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) MLA, Muslim Khan from Shekharpur Assembly for spreading religious hatred and hurting the religious sentiments of Hindus. The accused had put up an objectionable post on social media against a Hindu deity, police were quoted as saying.

According to the reports, the accused is a student at Kota, Rajasthan. He got into a verbal fight with one of his friends named Mayank Raj over religion after which he posted a derogatory comment against Hindu religion. Raj took a screenshot of the comment post and approached the UP Police seeking strict action against Abu Talha.

However, the accused person, a resident of the Kakrala region, Badaun, is said to have deleted the controversial comment later. Notably, the screenshots of the derogatory have been going viral since then. The accused blatantly abused Goddess Sita and used derogatory language against her.

Several Hindu activists raised their voices against the post after which the police took cognisance of the event and arrested the accused under section 505 (promoting enmity, hatred) of the Income Tax Act and section 67 of the Information Technology Act.

Inspector Haripal Singh Balyan commented on the issue and confirmed that a case has been registered against the son of a former BSP MLA from Shekhupur Assembly for spreading religious hatred and hurting religious sentiments. Investigations are underway.

7 days after Faizan got arrested in the Muskan suicide case, BBC Hindi is yet to retract their report that blamed her former Hindu partner

On June 19, late in the evening, a Muslim woman’s body was discovered hanging outside of her leased residence in the Aligarh region of Uttar Pradesh. Because Muskan had eloped with a Hindu man named Deepak 5 years ago the Leftist media tried to paint the story as one where a Hindu man was the culprit behind a Muslim woman’s death.

On 23 June, OpIndia published a news report on the suicide case of Muskan and exposed the attempt by the left-liberal media to paint the picture of ‘bhagwa love trap’ by blaming her former Hindu partner for the suicide.

The same ‘Hindu man caused Muslim woman’s death’ narrative was also peddled by BBC News Hindi.

Seven days on, the BBC is unapologetically running fake news without any correction. Notably, it has almost never reported on the several love jihad cases that are cropping up across India.

What was the case?

On June 19, late in the evening, a Muslim woman’s body was discovered hanging outside of her leased residence in the Aligarh region of Uttar Pradesh. According to preliminary evidence, the woman named Muskan, had eloped with and married a Hindu man named Deepak a few years ago.

The news of her death was quickly spread on social media under the hashtag ‘bhagwa love trap’, suggesting that the man had lured the woman into a relationship in exchange for her conversion to Hinduism and then killed her. However, the police discovered that the woman had split from Deepak a year ago and had been residing with a man named Mohammed Faizan ever since.

The tweets shared on social media by Islamist and left liberals falsely indicated that Muskan’s death was a result of some hoax concept recently developed by the Islamists named the ‘Bhagwa Love Trap,’ to counter the reality of love jihad.

Muskan had left Deepak, and was living with Mohammad Faizan

BBC’s report insinuates that Muskan Bano’s suicide was linked to her Hindu partner Deepak with whom she had eloped 4 years ago. However, the report conveniently left out the fact that Muskan had separated from Deepak was living with Mohammad Mohammed Faizan ever since.

Instead of basing it on the official police records, the report stems from the allegations Muskan’s family who had not spoken to her for a while and were not aware of the change in her life that had occurred when she settled in with Faizan and left Deepak.

According to the SHO, Muskan eloped with Deepak in 2019 while she was still a minor. Her parents later filed a complaint against Deepak for kidnapping after which the girl was recovered by the Police. 

Muskan testified before the court that she had eloped and was not the victim of kidnapping, which led to Deepak’s release on bail from judicial custody. After some time, they fled together once again and started living together. The SHO stated that it is unclear if they were legally wed.

Meanwhile, Faizan surrendered in court on June 22 and told the court that Muskan had been pressuring him for nikah while he had been avoiding it.

Zakir Ali Tyagi, a journalist for the contentious website The Wire, Kashif Arsalaan, a Muslim activist with more than 34,000 Twitter followers, Shahin Khan, a student with 46,000 followers on Twitter, Sadaf Afreen, a journalist with more than 61,000 followers on Twitter, and Kavish Aziz, a user with 58,000 Twitter followers are among those who suggested Deepak as accused under the so-called ‘Bhagwa love trap’.

The British Broadcasting Company blatantly published its agenda so long as a Hindu appeared to be guilty enough to push the ‘bhagwa love trap’ conspiracy theory. It has been seven days but the fake news continues to be published on BBC News Hindi website and twitter.

BBC’s tryst with propaganda

17 April 2023: BBC romanticises gangster Atiq Ahmed

BBC News ‘journalist’ Geeta Pandey stirred the hornet’s nest by trying to create a sympathy wave for deceased gangster-politician Atiq Ahmed.

In her piece titled ‘Atiq Ahmed: The brazen murder of an Indian mafia don-turned-politician,’ Pandey went on to weave a sorry tale around Ahmed’s childhood days. “The 60-year-old was born in a poor family in Prayagraj and was a school dropout…” the report read.

13 February 2023: BBC backs child marriage

BBC published a piece titled, “Indian women protest against child marriage mass arrest”, trying to push the theory that Indian women are somehow in favor of child marriages. Interestingly, BBC in its own report says that child marriages are prevalent in India due to patriarchal traditions, and then goes on to support that patriarchy.

Notably, the “BBC legend” Jimmy Savile was famous for abusing children sexually, with the first of those allegations appearing in 1958, but they were ignored by BBC till 2011 when Savile died.

10 February 2023: BBC sympathizes with ISIS bride

BBC faced backlash in its own country for trying to create sympathy for ‘ISIS bride’ Shamima Begum in its documentary titled The Shamima Begum Story. The documentary is a follow-up of the ten-part podcast by BBC on Shamina Begum, which was titled I’m Not a Monster, The Shamima Begum Story. After the podcast was released, BBC was accused of giving a platform to an ISIS terrorist.

29 January 2023: Protests against BBC documentary on Modi

The Indian diaspora in London staged a protest against BBC outside its headquarters over the documentary it released accusing Prime Minister Narendra Modi of the Gujarat Riots 2002 when he was Chief Minister of the state.

The Indian Government banned the two-part documentary released by BBC on Gujarat Riots 2002. While the Supreme Court has cleared then-CM Narendra Modi’s name in the riots, the media house accused him of not controlling the riots. Furthermore, the documentary tried to set the long-debunked narrative that the reason for the train burning in Godhra was unknown, which triggered the riots.

Rajinder Pal Singh smuggled 800 Indians from Canada to the US using ride-sharing app Uber, jailed for 3 years

On Tuesday, June 27, a 49-year-old man California resident identified as Rajinder Pal Singh, aka Jaspal Gill, has been imprisoned for smuggling more than 800 Indian citizens into the USA using the ride-sharing app Uber. He was sentenced to over three years in jail by the US District Court in Seattle.

The Department of Justice said in a press release that the accused had pleaded guilty in February, admitting that he was involved in a smuggling operation that brought hundreds of Indian citizens into Canada from across the border, earning more than USD 500,000.

“Over a four-year period, Mr Singh arranged for more than 800 people to be smuggled into the U.S. across the northern border and into Washington State,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Tessa M. Gorman.

“This conduct was not just a security risk for our country, it also subjected those smuggled to security and safety risks during the often weeks-long smuggling route from India to the United States. Mr Singh’s participation in this conspiracy preyed upon the Indian Nationals’ hopes for a better life in the United States while saddling those smuggled with a crushing debt of as much as $70,000,” the court added.

According to the news release, which cited documents submitted in the case, starting in July 2018, Singh and his accomplices used Uber to transport individuals who had illegally crossed the border from Canada to the Seattle region.

Singh organised more than 600 journeys involving the transportation of Indian people who were being trafficked into the US illegally between mid-2018 and May 2022.

According to investigation estimates, the 17 Uber accounts connected to the smuggling operation accrued more than USD 80,000 in charges between July 2018 and April 2022.

In trips that typically started near the border in the early hours and were split across different riders, Singh’s accomplices would use the one-way vehicle rentals to transport individuals smuggled to their final destinations outside Washington state, according to the press release.

The smuggling ring’s members also employed sophisticated techniques to launder the illegal earnings. Singh admitted that the purpose of the complex money movement was to obscure the illegal nature of the funds.

According to the news release, investigators also seized around $45,000 in cash and fake identification documents from one of Singh’s California homes.

Singh, who is not authorised to be in the US, will probably be deported after serving his sentence.

Leftist professor Ashutosh Varshney says Pakistani terrorists killing Indian armed forces is ‘understandable’, and 26/11 was bad because it made Aman Ki Asha difficult

Leftist professor Ashutosh Varshney has appeared recently on a Pakistani YouTube channel to discuss India-Pakistan and India-USA ties. In an hour-long discussion with Pakistani YouTuber Wajahat S Khan, Varshney has made some deeply problematic statements and has even tried to peddle debunked, discarded theories peddled by Leftist historians for decades.

The discussion skips why Pakistan is no longer seen as a US ally and focusses on ‘security’ concerns

In the discussion, the YouTuber Wajahat S Khan started off by discussing how India and USA are becoming close allies in recent years, and how the USA used to be an ally of Pakistan. Though Wajahat cited ‘security’ concerns in the world, like the Russia-Ukraine war and India-China hostilities as the reason, he carefully avoided mentioning that Pakistan is no longer considered a US ally because it has slid into economic doom and is seen globally as a failed state.

Varshney says rights of Muslims are endangered because of CAA

The discussion between Varshney and Wajahat Khan focused on the usual ‘Leftist-favourtite’ tropes of Modi bashing, waxing eloquence about ‘liberal democracies’. Varshney claimed that though India can be called an electoral democracy, it cannot be called a ‘liberal democracy’. He even cited the withdrawal of the FCRA license of foreign NGOs to make his point.

Varshney claimed the rights of Muslims in India have been harmed by CAA when the CAA does not even concern Indian Muslims.

Khan who is a Pakistani living in the USA, asked Varshney how Modi, who was refused a US visa some years ago, is now getting a red-carpet welcome in the USA as a state guest. Varshney goes ahead to claim that it is only because China is now the main adversary of the USA that the USA wants to be close to India.

Varshney admitted that it is difficult for the USA or anyone to paint India as undemocratic because India is a robust electoral democracy, and elections have been free and fair. He also admits that the welfare benefits and development programs carried out by the Modi government do not discriminate among people on the basis of their religion.

Point number 32 of India-USA joint statement

38 minutes into the discussion, Varshney drew Khan’s attention to point number 32 of the joint statement made by PM Modi and Joe Biden that

Point No 32 of the India-USA joint statement

Pakistani terrorists attacking Indian armed forces is ‘understandable’ for Varshney

“Many Indians who advocate for friendship with Pakistan also were disappointed with the 26/11. This is not how (Pakistan’s) national interests should be pursued. It is one thing to attack armed forces and paramilitary forces, but coming to Mumbai and attacking civilians was problematic. Many of us, who advocate for friendship with Pakistan, have faced a difficult situation because of the 26/11 because it has made it difficult for us to explain our cause (for India to have a friendly relationship with Pakistan)”, Varshney says.

Varshney then went ahead to add that even many Pakistanis had publically stated that 26/11 was wrong and that it was not how Pakistan should pursue its national interest. He said that he has witnessed Hussain Haqqani, Nazam Sethi, and many other Pakistani diplomats and intellectuals face difficulties defending the 26/11 attack.

Varshney added that 26/11 laid the groundwork for point number 32 to be substantiated all the years later. The paragraph explicitly mentions Pakistan-based terrorist organizations and stresses that India and USA will work together to bring the perpetrators of 26/11 to justice.

It is pertinent to mention here that for Ashutosh Varshney, the 26/11 attack was a mere inconvenience because he faced difficulties explaining his opinions advocating for India-Pakistan friendship. He even claims that the terrorist attacks on Army and paramilitary are ‘understandable’.

It comes across as a subtle way of saying that for Varshney, the Pulwama attack, Pathankot attack and other numerous attacks on Indian armed forces by Pakistani terrorists are ‘acceptable’ and even defendable. However, the 26/11 attack was bad because it made things inconvenient for him, not because it claimed the lives of 166 people including foreign nationals.

Many Indians have reacted to Varshney’s statement, pointing out how he casually mentions that he thinks attacks by Pakistan-sponsored terrorists on Indian armed forces are ‘understandable’.

Later in the video, Varshney goes ahead to advocate for India-Pakistan friendship, trying to placate his host by complimenting Pakistani agri products and singers.

‘Hindus are outsiders in India’

Varshney and his host then invent some claims about statements that PM Modi never made, and state that PM Modi’s mention of ‘1000 years of foreign rule’ means that he thinks all Muslims of India are outsiders. Using the debunked Aryan Invasion Theory, and some baseless whataboutery about Bollywood actors, Varshney goes on to claim that Indian Muslims are Indians only, and it is the Hindus themselves who are the outsiders.

That part of the discussion can be seen from 1.00 hours onwards.

Varshney is a professor of political science at Brown University. He is a columnist at the Indian Express and is popular among Leftists in India for his hyper-intellectualized scorn for PM Modi.

Mumbai: Ahead of Bakrid, Bombay High Court directs Mumbai Police and BMC to ensure no illegal slaughter takes place at Nathani Heights

On June 28, the Bombay High Court directed Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to ensure no illegal slaughter occurs at Nathani Heights Society in South Mumbai. A division Bench comprising of Justice Girish Kulkarni and Justice Jitendra Jain was hearing a petition filed by two society residents named Haresh Jain and Apeksha Shah.

In their plea, the residents cited environmental and hygiene concerns related to the slaughter of animals in open spaces in society. The bench heard the matter at 7 PM on Wednesday, with the hearing lasting until 8:10 PM. The petitioners stated there were no proper arrangements to maintain hygiene because of animal slaughter on Eid, posing a threat to the environment. The High Court directed BMC and Mumbai Police to ensure no illegal slaughter occurs inside the society.

In its order, the court said, “Respondent No 3,  Municipal Corporation, shall ensure that illegal slaughtering of animals shall be allowed at Nathani Heights situated at Lamington Road, Mumbai Central, Mumbai-400008 unless the same is recognised or licensed by the Municipal Corporation.”

The court added that in case the BMC has not issued a license to slaughter animals at the society, the municipal corporation officials have to take police help and initiate appropriate action in accordance with the law to prevent the slaughtering proposed for Bakrid. The court noted, “The Police Commissioner / Officer-in-Charge of Nagpada Police Station is directed to provide appropriate police assistance to the officers of the Municipal Corporation in the event an action is required to be taken.”

Appearing for BMC, advocate Joel Carlos opposed the ban and said the BMC officials would visit the site and take appropriate action if any violation is found. He added the words of the petitioner “cannot be taken to impose any ban”. Advocates Subhash Jha, Mikhail Dey, Pulkeshi Gaikwad, and Dinesh Tiwari appeared for the petitioner.

Notably, on June 27, petitioners approached Nagpada Police Station, where they were directed to BMC. The officers at BMC orally assured the petitioners that they would look into the matter on Wednesday morning and that all animals kept inside society premises for slaughtering would be removed. However, three residents brought animals inside the society forcing the petitioners to approach the High Court.

As per the Times Now report, local Muslim residents of the society and the BMC Commissioner held a meeting and took back the decision to slaughter animals on Bakrid. There were around 50 goats tied in the parking of the society. The court has set July 3 as the next date for the hearing.

HC expressed ‘great displeasure’ on the last-minute plea in a related matter

In a related matter, a division bench comprising Justice Gautam Patel and Neela Gokhale directed BMC to consider Hajrat Peer Malik’s petition to slaughter animals on Bakrid at Vishalgad Dargah. The court said, “We make it clear that we are not ourselves directing that the permission is to be granted, and we are not granting that permission ourselves. We are only directing that the application made by the petitioner (Hajrat Peer) is to be considered urgently by the authorities in question.”

The court also expressed displeasure over last-minute petitions. The bench said, “The Justice Patel-led bench disposing of the interim plea said: “At the same time, we express our great displeasure that such applications are repeatedly made at the last minute. Bakrid has been on the calendar for the better part of the year.”

Controversy over bringing goats to society houses for slaughter

On June 27, a controversy erupted in the capital city of Maharashtra concerning a Muslim family living in a Mira Road society in Mumbai. The family purchased two goats one day before Bakrid (Eid-Ul-Adha). However, the residents of Mira road housing society protested and stated that they would not allow any slaughter of animals (the goats) to take place within the society.

Residents of the society on Mira Road protested against the slaughter of goats on Bakrid within their premises. They also chanted Hanuman Chalisa, and some individuals raised “Jai Shree Ram” slogans. Videos of the incident have since gone viral in the media. After the residents protested, the police assured them that no slaughter would take place inside the housing society, and the Muslim couple also said the same.

Newslaundry compares Gandhi’s ‘experiments with celibacy’, where he slept naked with girls, to PM Modi’s marital status in a video targeting Prof Anand Ranganathan

On June 28, Newslaundry stooped to another low in journalism with a below-the-belt attack on Prime Minister Narendra Modi. In a 24-minute video, under their section ‘Tippani’ (comment in English), Newslaundry’s Atul Chaurasia ranted against Professor Anand Ranganathan for his comments on MK Gandhi. During the video, Chaurasia tried to draw a strange parallel between Gandhi’s celibacy experiments and PM Modi’s married life.

Chaurasia said, “Gandhi bluntly believed in idealism. Gandhi himself told the world about his experiments with celibacy. He did not hide it. He used to sleep naked while his granddaughter lived in the same room. It was a strange experiment. His associates were also stressed about it. But if you are from ‘Ranga Bridage’, you will describe it as ‘Gandhi used to sleep with his granddaughter’. This is a cunning way of describing it. Sleeping with granddaughter and sleeping in granddaughter’s presence are two different things.”

He added, “Take the example of Modi Ji. He broke his relationship with his wife long ago. In this, one side will always justify Modi claiming ‘he got married at a very young age. At that time, maybe he was not able to think or do anything about the decision [of the family]. The decision of two families was forced upon him. It is not necessary that it was the right decision. We do not know the real truth. In the language Gandhi is being described, is Ranga Babu going to describe Modi in the same language? You know the answer.”

In this segment, Chaurasia essentially wonders why Anand Ranganathan would not use the same language for MK Gandhi (while talking about his experiments with celibacy) and PM Modi (talking about his marriage). While attempting to show that Ranganathan was somehow biased against Gandhi and favoured PM Modi, Newslaundry ended up displaying their own glaring bias by essentially comparing the two and saying that the same yardstick needs to be used while talking abut the two situations – which have nothing in common – insinuating that PM Modi’s marital status was somehow equivalent or comparable to MK Gandhi sleeping naked with young girls.

His atrocious comments came in response to Prof Ranganathan’s recent video on the controversy surrounding Gita Press getting the Gandhi Award that went viral. In his statement, Prof Ranganathan said giving Gandhi Prize to Gita Press was an insult to Gita Press. He added that the award should not have existed in the first place. He briefly picked several instances of Gandhi’s life, including sleeping with his grandnieces, asking Hindus to let Muslims kill them, and asking Jews to disarm Hitler by praying and denying medicine to his wife while she was on her death bed, among others.

Prof Anand Ranganathan mentioned his celibacy experiments only twice, that too vaguely. But someone in Newslaundry thought it would be best to compare PM Modi’s married life with it in an elaborate video targeting Anand Ranganathan for not toeing their line.

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and his celibacy experiments – sleeping naked with young girls and women against their will

First of all, MK Gandhi did not sleep with his granddaughter but grandnieces and the sister of his personal secretary. Yes, there were three women, not one. Gandhi’s experiments were not limited to just sleeping with young girls and women naked. On October 2, 2020, OpIndia published a detailed report on his experiments based on available documents. Initially, MK Gandhi embraced Brahmacharya in 1906 when he was in his 30s. It included complete abstinence from sexual relationships with his wife, Kasturba Gandhi. Brahmacharya meant a complete change in his lifestyle, not just celibacy – it also included strict control on diet and other aspects of daily life. In 1907, he wrote, “It is the duty of every thoughtful Indian not to marry. In case he is helpless in regard to marriage, he should abstain from sexual intercourse with his wife.” According to him, sexual intercourse was justified only to have children and should be avoided at all other times.

However, things changed with time. His experiments with Brahmacharya got strange and bordered amounted to the abuse of young girls when he challenged his resolve to test himself. And thus began a series of experiments which the Newslaundry has now tried to justify. He had set up ashrams where he conducted his experiments, where boys and girls were to bathe together and sleep together. But they were to maintain chastity – they would be punished if there were any sexual talks. The rules of the ashram had forbidden married couples living in the ashram to sleep together, and Gandhi had advised that the husbands should not be alone with their wives. When they felt passion, they should take a cold bath; he had further advised.

Rules were different for Gandhi himself, who had started to surround himself with women to challenge his resolve. In the 1920s, Gandhi started resting his hand on the shoulders of young women during his morning and evening walks, whom he had jokingly referred to as his walking sticks. His grandnieces Abha and Manu were his regular ‘walking sticks’. After this started, elaborate daily massages were performed by young women in the ashram. The massage was followed by taking a bath, helped and accompanied by his female attendants.

Sushila Nayar, the sister of MK Gandhi’s personal secretary Pyarelal Nayyar, was his personal doctor who took care of MK Gandhi since her teenage years. She was his regular companion in taking baths. He had claimed that he didn’t look at Sushila while taking a bath together, saying he used to keep his eyes tightly shut.

Gandhi’s experiments also progressed as time progressed, which now involved young women sleeping with Gandhi naked. Initially, it was merely a sleeping arrangement, but it soon became a part of his experiments. This was his method of attaining the nirvana state of perfect Brahmacharya, to maintain abstinence while sleeping next to attractive young women naked. Apart from Sushila, his grandnieces Abha and Manu were his regular ‘sleeping companions’, along with other women in his Ashram.

As Gandhi grew older, the number of women surrounding him in the Ashram increased, particularly after the death of his wife, Kasturba, after Gandhi denied her treatment by Western medicine. More women were asked to sleep with him to test his control over his libido. While Gandhi slept naked with these women, they were not allowed to sleep with their own husbands in the Ashram.

Disclosing his experiments, he wrote in a letter to his Ashram manager Munnalal Shah Gandhi had written, “Abha slept with me for hardly three nights. Kanchan slept only one night. Vinas sleeping with me might be called an accident. All that can be said is that she slept close to me.” It may be noted that Kanchan was Munnalal’s wife, while Abha was the wife of Gandhi’s grandnephew Kanu Gandhi.

He went on to write, “What Abha and Kanchan told me was this; that she had no intention whatever of observing Brahmacharya, but wished to enjoy the pleasure of sex. She, therefore, stayed very reluctantly and undressed only for fear of hurting me. If I remember correctly, she was not with me for an hour. I then stopped both the women from sleeping with me, for I realised that Kanu and you were upset.” Gandhi then added that these three women were excluded from the experiment.

He then added, “I have deliberately included Pra. in the experiment. Maybe I should not. She often used to sleep with me to keep me warm even before I was conscious that I was doing an experiment. I used to draw her to me when she lay on the floor, shivering, for my sake.”

While many women slept naked with Gandhi, and some women were willing partners in his experiments, most did so at the insistence of Gandhi and not out of a free will. He had a strong personality, and it was very difficult to say no to him. Gandhi himself revealed it. In a letter to Krishnachandra, he wrote, “What I mean is that I have done naturally. Almost all of them would strip reluctantly. I have written— haven’t I?—that they did so at my prompting. If I wish to be a Brahmachari under all circumstances and want women also to be such, this is the one way. Now leave this matter alone and watch what happens.”

Gandhi led a very unusual life which would not be acceptable in today’s era, and legal action will follow if someone tries such ‘experiments’ today. Actually, it was not acceptable in that era. From his personal assistants to senior leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, everyone criticised it. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel had called it a “terrible blunder” and had asked him to stop it.

Newslaundry and the new low in journalism – comparing MK Gandhi’s questionable ‘experiments’ with PM Modi’s marital situation in a video targeting Anand Ranganathan

Prime Minister Modi got married when his wife, Jasodaben was 17. According to her own interview when Narendra Modi was declared BJP’s PM candidate, after marriage, when she came to his house, he would ask her why she came to her in-law’s house when she is so young. He would repeatedly ask her to pursue her studies and do well in life. She spoke about how the separation was amicable and her in-laws were always kind to her. Essentially, it was a marriage because the families decided so, however, it was evident that Modi’s heart was not in it. He had dedicated his life to his work and wanted Jasodaben to study and advance her career and life.

Jasodaben says that in the three years that they were together, Modi and she must have communicated for only three months in which he told her to pursue academics. She still wishes him well and hopes he succeeds.

Ultimately, it was a child marriage which ended with both parties going their separate ways amicably, with the woman going on to pursue her studies and becoming a teacher and the man going on to lead a country of 1.3 billion people.

To compare this with MK Gandhi’s ‘experiments’ with celibacy where he admits that he slept naked with young girls and women against their will is an example of propaganda journalism that discovers new lows in their political hate. MK Gandhi slept naked with young girls and women, sometimes, against their will. They were reluctant in getting undressed but Gandhi insisted. PM Modi separated from his young wife, urging her to pursue her studies and dedicated himself to the service of the people of his country.

Interestingly, Newslaundry had a previous working relationship with Anand Ranganathan. After they parted ways because of their ideological difference, the “journalists” and writers of Newslaundry constantly slandered Ranganathan and encouraged vicious abuse against him. Ranganathan refused to toe their Leftists line and paid the price for it. This video by Newslaundry was another attempt to slander Anand Ranganathan and in the process, slander PM Modi and all those who refuse to bow down to their insidious agenda.

Those who are aware of the lifestyle Gandhi followed in the backdrop of their ‘larger than life’ stature as “Father of the Nation”, “Mahatma”, or “Bapuji” can see how wrong Newslaundry is. Stooping low to the level where you compare Gandhi’s sexual experiments with naked women outside his marriage is disgusting and a blot on journalism.

Saudi Arabia: Armed man open fires outside US consulate in Jeddah, two dead. Here is what we know so far

On Wednesday (June 28), an armed man opened fire outside the US consulate in Jeddah city of Saudi Arabia.

As per reports, the unnamed accused stopped his car outside the consulate building and fired gunshots. This led to a retaliatory firing by the Saudi security authorities, which resulted in his death. A Nepali security guard, deployed at the building, also died after sustaining injuries during the gunfight.

In a statement, a police spokesperson (Makkah region) informed, “A person in a car stopped near the American Consulate building in Jeddah Governorate and got out of it carrying a firearm in his hand, so security authorities took the initiative to deal with him as required, and the exchange of fire resulted in his death.”

According to the US State Department, no Americans were harmed during the attack. A spokesperson for the US State Department said, “The U.S. Embassy and Consulate remain in contact with Saudi authorities as they investigate the incident.”

“We offer our sincere condolences to the family and loved ones of the deceased local guards member,” the official added. Following the shooting, the US consulate building was locked down. The motive of the armed assailant behind orchestrating the attack has not been ascertained so far.

Past attacks on the US consulate in Jeddah

Reportedly, the US consulate building in Jeddah has been targeted several times in the past. On the occasion of America’s Independence Day (July 4) in 2016, a suicide bombing attack was carried out at the Dr Suleiman Faqeeh Hospital, which is located opposite the consulate building.

The incident resulted in the death of the terrorist and injured two others. Similarly in 2004, five terrorists belonging to the radical Islamist outfit ‘Al-Qaeda’ barged into the US consulate building in Jeddah, killing 4 Saudi security personnel and 5 staffers of the building.

About 18 employees in the US consulate were also held hostage. In total, three of the five terrorists were neutralised. One man was awarded the death penalty in 2013 while 19 others were given jail sentences of up to 25 years.