Home Blog Page 3676

Non-Hindus cannot be barred from participating in the auction of shops in Srisailam Temple in Andhra Pradesh: SC overturns HC verdict

The Supreme Court on Friday observed that people belonging to other faiths cannot be barred from carrying out commercial activities in the premises of the Srisailam temple at Kurnool in Andhra Pradesh. It, thus, permitted people from all religions to participate in the process of auction of leases of shops in the temple premises.

The two-judge bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and BV Nagarathna said: “None of the tenants/shop holders shall be excluded from participating in the auction or from the grant of leases solely on the ground of their religion”. It directed the Andhra Pradesh government to grant licence and lease for shops to non-Hindus as well at Srisailam’s Sri Bhramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamy Varla Devasthanam in the state’s Kurnool district.

The court stated in its brief judgement that any other order issued by the Andhra Pradesh high court prohibiting the state government and the Devasthanam management from granting licences or leases to non-Hindus will be annulled.

“We direct that none of the tenants or shop owners shall be excluded from participating in the auction or in the grant of leases, including in the shopping complex, solely on the ground of their religion,” said the apex court.

“It is one thing to say that you cannot have a liquor shop or anything like this in temple premises but to say that non-Hindus cannot conduct any commercial activity is too far-fetched. How can you say that a non-Hindu cannot even sell flowers or toys there? If the need arises, we will set aside such judgments,” the bench told senior advocate CS Vaidyanathan, who appeared for the YS Jaganmohan Reddy-led government.

The SC was reviewing a slew of appeals against the high court’s September 2019 decision upholding the state government’s ban on non-Hindus acquiring leases and licences for Hindu religious organisations’ shops, malls, and retail complexes.

The petitioners, all Muslims, claimed that the 2015 government decision infringed on their right to life because they operated stores on properties that were leased to them in line with the rules. “The administration of properties belonging to a religious group is not a matter of religion covered by Article 26 (B) of the Indian Constitution, and permitting public auction without illegal and arbitrary restrictions does not take away a religious denomination’s constitutional rights of administration,” they argued.

According to the petition, many of the petitioners had been operating their businesses as tenants on the Srisailam temple site since 1980 but were now being discriminated against merely because of their religion.

It may be noted that for the past few years several allegations of non-Hindu activities in the temple town have emerged. Last year, BJP MLA from Goshamahal, T. Raja Singh, had alleged that the Srisailam Temple in Andhra Pradesh has fallen under the control of Muslims and all contracts and shops have been monopolized by them. He had also claimed that cows in the Goshala were being slaughtered for their meat.

A year prior to this, four Christians were taken into custody in the Temple Town of Srisailam in Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh for “actively propagating Christianity”.

In September 2019, a vehicle reportedly canvassing Christianity was found by Hindu devotees. The vehicle had flex banners across the bonnet containing text from the Bible.

Local priests are of the opinion that the entire hill town is part of the sanctum sanctorum and is sacred, and individuals of other faiths are not permitted to propagate their faith in the area. Mallikarjuna Jyotirlinga Temple is located in the town and is one of the holy pilgrimage site for Saivism and Shaktism sects of Hinduism. The Srisailam town is classified as both Jyotirlinga and Shakti Peetha.

Former FBR head of Pakistan Shabbar Zaidi, says Pakistan has become bankrupt, not a ‘going concern’ anymore: Details

The former head of the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) of Pakistan, Shabbar Zaidi has said that Pakistan at this moment is bankrupt and not in a state of ‘going concern’. Zaidi said this during a seminar at Hamdard University on ‘Evolving Pakistan Economy, Challenges and Opportunities for Youth’ held on December 15.

“We keep saying that everything is good, the country is running well, we have achieved great success and we brought tabdeeli (change) but this is wrong. In my view, Pakistan is, at the moment, bankrupt and not a going concern,” Zaidi had said.

Continuing his criticism of the economic policies of Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan, the former FBR head said that one should admit Pakistan has reached bankruptcy hence appropriate steps needed to be taken.

“It is better if you decide first that we have reached bankruptcy and we have to move forward compared to saying everything is running well and I will do this and that. These are all things to deceive the people,” Zaidi said.

However, Zaidi who was subjected to political cross-firing in Pakistan over his remarks, later on, said that he was misreported and only a selected portion of his speech was cherry-picked.

Zaidi in a series of tweets said that his statement should be taken in a complete and proper perspective.  

But even in these tweets, he maintained that what he said had a basis and conviction. He was not denying that Pakistan has become a bankrupt entity.

Zaidi asked Imran Khan government to recognise the reality then living in illusion. “We need to have a reality check,” he said.

Zaidi went on to say that bankruptcy and credit default are two different but related terms. When loan liabilities are not repayable from foreseeable earnings it is called bankruptcy and Pakistan has been facing this situation for a long time.

Zaidi hits out at foreign and education policy of Pakistan

Zaidi advocated change in the political, foreign and educational policy of Pakistan. Zaidi said that Pakistani government needs to ensure ‘extremely good’ relations with the United States and the West if its wants to increase its export.

He also said Pakistan also needs to improve its regional trade and questioned the policy of Pakistan towards India. Zaidi said if Pakistan can bring raw materials for medicines from India, then “why do you have an issue with other things? This means your decision to not trade is wrongly based.”

Without mentioning Pakistan sponsoring Islamic radicalism Zaidi advocated reform in the education system. Zaidi said that teaching of English should be promoted in Pakistan and the teaching of theology to higher grades should be limited.

‘Satan’ might take over if you stay alone with your sister and daughter: SP leader Abu Azmi after Congress leader trivialised rape

On Friday (December 17), Maharashtra Samajwadi Party (SP) leader Abu Azmi courted controversy after he suggested that staying alone with your daughter or sister can lead to rape. He made the contentious remarks during an interview with News 18 after the Union Cabinet gave a nod to increasing the minimum marriageable age for women to 21.

On being quizzed by journalist Amish Devgan about his reasons for opposing the new proposal, Azmi alleged, “Our culture says that when girls/children grow up or become adults, they should be married immediately. Or wait patiently if you do not find a suitable partner.”

He added, “Once the delay the prolonged, even after such a partner is found, then only the parents of the child will be accused of committing a sin. This is because the responsibility of sinful behaviour of their children (if any) will then lie on their parents.”

On hearing this, Amish Devgan asked, “Don’t you have trust in women?”. The Samajwadi Party leader clarified, “No, there is nothing like this. They are definitely trustworthy. I also have a girl. I am not talking about trust here.”

Azmi went on to make bizarre claims about rape and suggested that staying alone with your daughter and sister can make you commit such a heinous crime. “If my girl/daughter or sister is alone at home, then, my sacrament tells me to not stay near them. The Satan (Devil) might take over your spirits,” he emphasised.

“We are witnessing several rape cases committed by cousin brothers and fathers… This is a precautionary measure taught by our forefathers,” Azmi claimed. The Samajwadi Party leader concluded, “Interference in the rules of Bhagwan and Allah leads to disbalance in the society.”

It must be mentioned that Abu Azmi had earlier suggested that women would go astray if they were not married early. Another Samajwadi Party leader Shafiqur Rahman Barq claimed that it would equip girls with excuses to do ‘awargi’ (indulge in reckless, immoral behaviour).“

Union Cabinet raises minimum marriageable age of women, personal laws to be amdended

On December 15, the Union Cabinet approved a proposal to raise the legal age of marriage of women from 18 years to 21 years. During the Independence Day address in August 2020, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had announced the same and said the Government was planning to amend the law for the same.

He again pointed out the same in an address to the people of the nation in October 2020 and said the government would soon take a decision over it. Once the law is amended, the legal marriageable age for both men and women would become the same, i.e. 21 years. Following the announcement of the decision, there was speculation that the decision would just affect Hindus because it was unclear whether personal laws would be changed.

It was unclear if any change to Muslim Personal Law would be made to amend the minimum age of marriage for women, which is currently 15 years. The speculation was that the Muslim personal law would give the community the right to marry their girls at 15, and Hindus would follow the law, thereby affecting the fertility rate and screwing the demography further.

OpIndia reached out to sources in the know to get clarity on the issue. Sources have clarified that all personal laws, including Sharia and Christian laws, would also be amended to increase the marital age of women to 21.

Film has a very ‘special moment’ that Pakistanis will love: Actor Ranveer Singh speaks about his upcoming movie ’83’

Bollywood actor Ranveer Singh has been busy promoting his upcoming film ’83’, which revolves around India’s iconic win against West Indies in the 1983 World Cup. Recently, during a press conference, the Padmavat actor revealed that his forthcoming movie is going to be a treat for Pakistanis.

Singh responded to a question from a Pakistani by saying that the film includes a “special moment” that Pakistanis will love. “I shall not reveal it but very soon you will see the movie and remember me. There is a very special moment in the movie that as a Pakistani you would really enjoy. It is very important for me…”, said the actor to the Pakistani journalist.

A Dubai based journalist Sadiq Salim shared the snippet of the press conference on his Instagram handle, where the Bollywood actor is heard emphasising how his movie is going to be a visual treat for the Pakistani fans along with individuals of all ages and walks of life.

The Padmaavat actor also said “but if you are a cricket nut, this film is another trip altogether. If you know those players and you know those details of cricket and have that cricket keera [bug], it’s going to be quite the experience.”

The movie is all set to hit the theatres on December 24, 2021. Directed by Kabir Khan, the movie is based on the actual events that had happened during the 1983 Cricket World Cup. Actor Ranveer Singh is playing the role of former Captain Kapil Dev in the movie. Deepika Padukone is also starring in the film as Dev’s wife Romi.

Zoha Rahman, a British-Pakistani actor, is poised to star alongside Ranveer Singh in the highly awaited film ’83. The actor will play a first-generation immigrant in the United Kingdom, according to a press release.

“It’s an honour to be part of such a huge project next to some of the greatest stars of our time,” Rahman was quoted as saying in the press release. “It’s definitely one of the most exciting experiences of my life,” she added.  

Twitter locks journalist’s account after she tweeted about Jihadis and Islamists threatening her brother in Kashmir

On the 15th of December, journalist Aarti Tikoo, a Kashmiri Pandit herself, took to Twitter to raise alarm about Islamic terrorists from Kashmir issuing death threats to her brother. Two days later, on the 17th of December, Twitter India, the social media giant, decided to “lock” Aarti Tikoo’s account. The notice that Aarti got said that she could “unlock” her account if she deleted the tweet about her brother getting threats.

Notice by Twitter, shared by various people

Aarti Tikoo had tweeted, “My brother @TikooSahil_ who lives in Srinagar, is being openly threatened by jihadi terrorists sitting in Kashmir-India, and their handlers in Pakistan, UK and US. Is anyone watching? Are we sitting ducks waiting to be shot dead by Islamists or will you crackdown on them?”. Saying this, Tikoo had tagged the Home Minister Office’s handle on Twitter.

Twitter, for some odd reason, decided that this tweet raising alarm over her brother getting threats violated their community standards. In the notice that Tikoo got to delete the tweet, Twitter deemed this tweet as targeting a group of people, threatening them or harassing them.

In the notice, Twitter said, “You may not promote violence against, threaten or harass other people on the basis of race, national origin, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious identity, religious affiliation, age, disability or serious disease”.

The notice further said that she had to delete her tweet, thereby acknowledging that her tweet violated Twitter rules.

When Twitter locks the account due to tweets that they believe violate their community standards, Twitter “locks” the account. This essentially restricts the users from Tweeting anything unless they delete the tweet in question, acknowledging that they violated Twitter rules. There is a provision to appeal the disputed tweet, but Twitter either hardly responds or responds upholding their division, no matter how inexplicable.

In this instant too, Aarti Tikoo seems to have tweeted nothing that would go against Community standards. In fact, she raised alarm about her brother getting death threats. Twitter perhaps locked her account deeming that the use of the word “Jihadi” or “Islamist” was against religion, religious affiliation, or community that Twitter wishes to protect. Here, Twitter seems to have deemed a tweet, raising alarm over death threats, hateful to the people who were issuing the threats.

IT guidelines issued by the central government, not being followed by Facebook, Twitter and other social media platforms

In February 2020, The central government issued fresh guidelines for social media and OTT platforms. The government said that these guidelines were being introduced to “establish a soft touch progressive institutional mechanism with a level playing field featuring a Code of Ethics and a three-tier grievance redressal framework for news publishers and OTT platforms on the digital media”. 

The guidelines that were issued by the central government had several provisions and code of ethics for the functioning of OTT platforms, Digital News websites and Social Media behemoths like Twitter, Facebook etc.

One of the most significant provisions of these guidelines is that if the social media platforms don’t comply with the provisions prescribed in the guidelines, this will attract penal provisions as per the Information Technology Act. The new guidelines say that the social media intermediaries must follow the due diligence mentioned in it, and if any intermediary does not follow the due diligence, the safe harbour provisions will not apply to them.

The section 79 of the Information Technology Act defines this safe harbour, which basically makes them not liable for any content posted by users on their platforms. It says that an intermediary shall not be liable for any third-party information, data, or communication link made available or hosted by them, provided they themselves didn’t initiate such communication, and observes due diligence under the IT act.

Now, this due diligence to be observed by the social media companies have been defined in the new guidelines. It includes various measures they have to perform, like identifying the first originator of any information that appears on social media, not allowing content that is defamatory, obscene, pornographic, paedophilic, inciting violence, against national integrity, misleading, false etc. The platforms also have to remove any such content within 36 hours of receiving a court order or a government direction to remove such content.

According to the guidelines, if the social media sites allow such objectionable content to be hosted on their platforms, and don’t remove them even after receiving such orders from courts or the government, it will mean that they are not observing due diligence. As a consequence, they will lose the safe harbour in the IT Act that isolates them from content posted on their platforms.

This means, if the social media companies do not comply with the guidelines, they will be held responsible for any content which is not allowed as per the guidelines. And, the officials of the social media companies will be liable to be prosecuted for such content. This implies that the social media officials will also be punished according to the nature of the offence, which is defined in the IT Act for various kinds of offences. The punishment defined in the act includes imprisonment for three years for most offences, but life imprisonment for some like cyber terrorism, and also includes fines of various amounts.

Ideally, this instance would be perfect for Twitter’s safe harbour to be taken away given that they seem to have allowed threats to be hosted on their platform, but deem a Tweet raising alarm over the tweets “hateful”.

West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee takes credit for the UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage tag for Durga Puja. Here is the truth

A day after UNESCO added Durga Puja in Kolkata to its list of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee attempted to take credit for the historic feat.

While speaking to the media, Banerjee claimed, “I’m overwhelmed with the prize that I got yesterday. Durga Puja has been inscribed on UNESCO’s Intangible Heritage List. Some people, who said Mamata didn’t let people perform puja, should hide their faces…I want to make West Bengal number one in the world.”

Screengrab of the tweet by ANI

The West Bengal Chief Minister insinuated that the listing of Durga Puja in UNESCO’s Intangible Heritage list was the result of her endeavour. However, nothing can be further from the truth. It was, in fact, the consequence of active pursuit by the Narendra Modi-led-government at the Centre. As per a report published by the Financial Express on April 3, 2019, the Modi government had nominated Durga Puja in Kolkata for UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) status for 2020.

“The nomination has been forwarded by the Sangeet Natak Akademi, which operates under the Union Ministry of Culture. Sangeet Natak Akademi has termed Durga Puja as the most important festival of West Bengal. It has said that apart from Kolkata, the festival is observed in several states and cities across India and even in a number of countries.” the report added.

It further stated, “…Durga Puja vividly manifests the amalgamation of religion and art in the city. One will get a detailed exhibition of the celebration of craftsmanship, cross-community revelry and cross-cultural transactions. These are the reasons why Sangeet Natak Akademi has nominated Durga Puja in Kolkata for UNESCO Heritage status for 2020.”

Screengrab of the news report by Financial Express

BJP lashes out at Mamata Banerjee

Union Minister For Culture, Tourism And Development Of North Eastern Region (DoNER) G Kishan Reddy refuted the claims of Mamata Banerjee on Twitter, and informed that it was the result of 2 years of hard work of the union culture ministry through the Sangeet Natak Akademi. He also credited the external affairs ministry and India’s Permanent Delegation to UNESCO for recognition.

In a tweet, BJP IT Cell Head Amit Malviya informed, “No, Mamata Banerjee, you didn’t get the award. It is a recognition for India and (the) proud people of Bengal because of the proposal sent by the Sangeet Natak Akademi, an institution under the Modi government. You, on the contrary, did everything to destroy (the) Durga Puja festival…”

He shared details of the Modi government’s initiative (as published by the Financial Express) and added, “Finally, on Dec 15, 2021, the UNESCO had accepted the proposal of Union Govt of India and included the Durga Puja in the UNESCO #IntangibleHeritage list.”

Mamata Banerjee had undermined Durga Puja for appeasement politics

In 2017,  Mamata Banerjee had announced that there would be no idol immersion after 6 pm on Dashami day to make way for the observance of Muharram. Following the announcement, a PIL was filed in the Calcutta High Court which claimed that the announcement had hurt the religious sentiments of the majority community.

The Calcutta High Court drew parallels between West Bengal Police and Maharashtra Police in terms of handling festivals of different communities falling on the same day, which didn’t go down quite well with Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. During the hearing, the judges asked how many Muharram procession requests were granted during the said period. It turned out that only two organisers had sought permission for the Taazia procession during Muharram.

The Court found it surprising that for only two processions, the government had stalled the entire Durga Puja immersion ceremony. The TMC government had passed a similar order back in 2016 over Durga idol immersions. This order was not only flayed by Kolkata High Court, the language used by the court was quite extraordinary in that it specifically castigated the West Bengal government for “appeasing Muslims”.

Krishna Janmabhoomi Mukti Aandolan Samiti files petition to stop namaz at the Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura

0

Sri Krishna Janmabhumi Mukti Aandolan Samiti has submitted an application to a Mathura court in the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute and sought a direction to stop the Namaz being offered at the Shahi Idgah Mosque and on the adjacent road. In the application submitted to the court, the Hindu organization also questioned the five times offering of Namaaz in the Shah Idgah Mosque in Mathura.

The application submitted by the organization asserted that the place under question is a revered site for Hindus. The application read, “the place where the mosque had been constructed is a revered site for the Hindus as Lord Krishna was born there. In the year 1669, brutal attacker Aurangzeb got the mosque built after destroying the temple.”

Advocate Mahendra Pratap Singh has also pointed out that Namaz was never offered at the Shahi Idgah Mosque as it was a disputed land but in recent years, there was a sudden intentional effort to offer Namaz five times a day at the Mosque. He said, “This is the property of Hindu Parties and Namaz was never offered in the Idgah Premises but in last few years the opposite parties have been offering five times namaz intentionally, which is legally impermissible. As per Holy Quran also, Namaz can’t be offered on the disputed land. The opponents are deliberately trying to disturb communal harmony and they are even offering Namaz on the road…

Further, it was argued that the Shah Idgah Mosque was forcefully built by Mughal ruler Aurangzeb who demolished a Sri Krishna Temple in 1669. He noted that the walls of the Mosque were still marked with Hindu religious symbols which prove that the Mosque was constructed through illegal and forceful means. The petition alleges that the Muslim parties are trying to remove the Hindu symbols like Om, Swastik, Shankh and Shesh Nag from the walls.

The petition also mentions that as per the holy Quran, Namaz can’t be offered on the disputed land.

Notably, earlier in June, Krishna Janmabhumi Mukti Aandolan Samiti had already submitted an application at the Mathura court where it offered the Muslim parties (management committee of the Mosque) a larger piece of land in exchange for demolition of the Shahi Idgah Mosque. The plea said, “There are many stones in which Hindu scriptures are visible and the Mosque was built after destroying the temple on the orders of Aurangzeb.

Fauci says redefinition of the term ‘Fully Vaccinated’ for Covid-19 is on the table as Biden administration pushes for booster shots

0

Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the United States, Dr. Anthony Fauci stated on Friday that redefinition of the term ‘fully vaccinated’ in the coming months cannot be ruled out amidst the spread of Omicron or in the event of the emergence of further mutated variants of COVID-19. The statement of US Infectious Diseases expert was made in the wake of the Biden administration’s push for a COVID booster shot.

It has been said that a reconsideration of the meaning and concept of ‘fully vaccinated’ is “certainly is on the table and open for discussion” as the US government advise people to take the booster shots.

As per the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention, full vaccination status in the present context meant two weeks after the second shot in two-dose vaccines like Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines or a single-dose vaccine like the J&J vaccine. A redefinition of the term would most probably mean making another dose mandatory to consider a person to be fully vaccinated. At present, the additional doses are given as booster doses and they are optional for people.

President Joe Biden’s top medical advisor further said that there was no doubt that optimum vaccination was with a booster dose.

Fauci said that for more protection, he would recommend a booster shot saying, “There’s no doubt that optimum vaccination is with a booster,” adding, “Whether or not the CDC is going to change that, it certainly is on the table and open for discussion. I’m not sure exactly when that will happen. But I think people should not lose sight of the message that there’s no doubt if you want to be optimally protected, you should get your booster.”

Former FDA commissioner and CNBC contributor, Dr. Scott Gottlieb noted that the new variant Omicron spread faster than the earlier threat which was Delta and that people were running out of time. He said, “We know omicron moves very quickly … this variant is going to move much more quickly through the country than delta did, so people who are waiting to get a booster to afford themselves a measure of protection against this variant – time is running out to do that,”

Earlier, CDC director Rochelle Walensky also had talked about redefining the term Fully Vaccinated for Covid-19, indicating making the booster dose a mandatory third dose. “We have not yet changed the definition of ‘fully vaccinated.’ We will continue to look at this. We may need to update our definition of ‘fully vaccinated’ in the future,” she had said.

Serum Institute’s COVID-19 vaccine Covovax gets WHO approval for emergency use

The World Health Organisation(WHO) on Friday approved the emergency use for Serum Institute of India’s Covovax, vaccine developed by the Serum Institute of India (SII) in partnership with the US-based Novavax, for showing excellent safety and efficacy. With this approval, Covovax became the 9th Covid-19 vaccine to be permitted for emergency use, providing a boost to ongoing efforts to vaccinate more people in lower-income countries.

“This is yet another milestone in our fight against Covid-19. Covovax is now WHO approved for emergency use, showing excellent safety and efficacy. Thank you all for a great collaboration,” Adar Poonawalla tweeted.

WHO’s EUL procedure assesses the quality, safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines and is a prerequisite for COVAX vaccine supply. It also allows countries to expedite their own regulatory approval to import and administer COVID-19 vaccines. 

Dr Mariângela Simão, WHO Assistant Director-General for Access to Medicines and Health Products, said with newer variants of the virus emerging, vaccines alone remain the most effective tool to protect people against serious complications and even death. “This listing aims to increase access, particularly in lower-income countries, 41 of which have still not been able to vaccinate 10% of their populations, while 98 countries have not reached 40%,” Simão said.

“Covovax was assessed under the WHO EUL procedure based on the review of data on quality, safety and efficacy, a risk management plan, programmatic suitability, and manufacturing site inspections carried out by the Drugs Controller General of India,” a press release by the WHO said. The health body also added that SII’s vaccine met WHO standards for protection against COVID-19, that the benefit of the vaccine far outweighs any risks, and that the vaccine can be used globally.

Covovax is a subunit of the vaccine developed by Novavax and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI). It requires two doses and is stable at 2 to 8 °C refrigerated temperatures. The vaccine uses a novel platform and is produced by creating an engineered baculovirus containing a gene for a modified SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

Amnesty International documents war crimes committed by the Taliban and killing of ethnic and religious minorities

In a report published by Amnesty International, it has been stated that the Taliban wanted to behead the injured people captured during its offensive in July and August 2021 as the Taliban took control of the districts in Afghanistan. The report also revealed that the Taliban butchered ethnic and religious minorities, former ANDSF soldiers and those who supported the government.

The report titled No Escape: War Crimes and Civilian Harm During The Fall Of Afghanistan To The Taliban, documents torture, extrajudicial executions and killings by the Taliban during the final assault on Afghanistan ahead of capturing Kabul.

“Our new evidence shows that, far from the seamless transition of power that the Taliban claimed happened, the people of Afghanistan have once again paid with their lives,” says Amnesty in its report. It states that homes, hospitals, schools and shops were turned into crime scenes as people were repeatedly killed and injured

When the Taliban forces attacked Bazarak town in Panjshir province on 6 September 2021, around 20 men were taken as captives by Talibani militants. These men were detained and were sometimes forced inside a pigeon coop. These captured men from Bazarak were tortured, denied food and threatened with execution.

One of them said, “[The] Talib had taken a knife… he was saying he wanted to behead the wounded… because they are infidels and Jews.”  

While another man stated, “They kept us underground. When we were asking for medical treatment of the wounded, the Taliban were saying, ‘Let them die’… There was no food and water, and no support to the wounded. They had brutal relations with us. When we were asking for water, they were saying, ‘Die of thirst’.”

In another instance, the Taliban conducted a door-to-door operation in the village of Urmaz to mark people who worked for the government. Talibani militants then extrajudicially gunned down at least six civilian men within 24 hours and brazenly committed war crimes. Eyewitnesses account stated that most of the civilians killed by Taliban forces were not involved with the government or in any kind of hostilities.

The report also recorded retaliatory attacks and the killing of people having links with the former government in Spin Boldak. Taliban massacres of ethnic Hazaras in Ghazni and Daykundi provinces had also been documented by Amnesty International while the full scale of Taliban atrocities cannot be estimated as the Taliban forces have destroyed or disrupted the mobile phone service and communication in the rural areas.  

The Amnesty report also documents civilian deaths caused by US and Afghan airstrikes, which included three strikes by American forces and one by Afghan forces.

“The International Criminal Court must reverse its misguided decision to deprioritize investigations into US and Afghan military operations, and instead follow the evidence on all possible war crimes, no matter where it leads,” Amnesty demanded in its report.