Home Blog Page 5935

INX Media case: Former Union Minister P Chidambaram arrested by ED following interrogation at Delhi’s Tihar jail

Former Union Minister and Congress leader P Chidambaram was arrested by Enforcement Directorate after questioning him at Delhi’s Tihar Jail in connection with INX media scam. The Court had given ED the permission to arrest Chidambaram after interrogation.  

According to the reports, Enforcement Directorate (ED) officials on Wednesday morning had reached Tihar Jail to interrogate senior Congress leader P Chidambaram after a special court in Delhi on Tuesday allowed three ED officials to interrogate the former Home Minister in INX Media money laundering case.

The ED team arrested scam accused Chidambaram after interrogating him for 30 minutes in connection with the matter. Chidambaram’s wife Nalini and son Karti, who is also one of the accused in the case, was also present at the Tihar jail this morning to meet him.

On Tuesday, the ED had moved two applications to formally arrest and seek the custody of P Chidambaram for money laundering in the INX Media case. Special CBI Judge Ajay Kumar Kuhar had allowed the ED to interrogate the Congress leader and arrest him if deemed necessary.

Read: All you need to know about the INX Media scam 

The ED’s plea was strongly opposed by senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Chidambaram, who said that the CBI has already taken remand and ED has no ground since the offence is same. Sibal had also opposed interrogation inside court premises citing ‘dignity of court proceedings’.

P Chidambaram has been in custody since August 21 and is currently lodged in the Tihar jail. He is under the scanner of CBI and the Enforcement Directorate in the INX Media case in which he is accused of misusing his position as India’s finance minister and granting several clearances to the INX Media company.

Chidambaram has moved to the Supreme Court seeking bail in the INX Media case. The CBI has been objecting his bail on the ground that he might influence witnesses.

Ram Janmabhoomi case: Senior Advocate Rajeev Dhavan representing Muslim parties has a complete meltdown, tears up maps, papers

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan representing the Muslim parties in the Supreme Court in the Ram Janmabhoomi – Babri Masjid case had a complete meltdown as Senior advocate Vikas Singh sought to place on record the book ‘Ayodhya Revisited’ by former IPS Kishore Kunal. Senior advocate Singh is representing the Hindu Mahasabha and the book ‘Ayodhya Revisited’ talks about pre-existence of Ram Temple in Ayodhya.


In a complete meltdown, Dhavan then started tearing off papers and maps handed over to him by the Hindu Mahasabha as he strongly opposed the party in the Supreme Court.

Read: Ram Janmabhoomi case: Sunni Waqf Board may give up claim to title, but with conditions, lawyer denies knowledge

The CJI then asked him to shred them further and Dhavan tore off more pages.

Today is the last day of arguments and CJI Ranjan Gogoi has announced that the bench will wrap up the hearing by 5 PM.

We will fight future wars with ‘Made In India’ weapons and will win: COAS Bipin Rawat

Speaking at the Defence Research and Development Organisation’s (DRDO) 41st directors’ conference in Delhi yesterday, COAS Bipin Rawat stated that India will fight and win the future wars with indigenously produced weapons and systems.

As per reports, the COAS highlighted the need to focus on non-contact warfare and stated, “We are looking at systems for future warfare. We have to start looking at the development of cyber, space, laser, electronic and robotic technologies and artificial intelligence.”


The COAS stated that even after 70 years of independence, we are one of the largest importers of arms and ammunition in the world and this is not a very proud statement to make. He further added that in the last few years, DRDO has achieved a lot in defence innovation and production.

Home minister Rajnath Singh too, addressing the same event, asked the scientists to develop cutting edge technologies to make India not only self-sufficient but also a global leader in defence manufacturing.


Rajnath Singh also asked the scientists to develop products that will stay relevant for the next 15-20 years. “There are certain limitations in technology and there is a gestation period for the development of products. It is possible that during the gestation period of complex systems, new technical requirements emerge. Spiral development should be given priority for such systems,” said the Defence Minister.

National Security Adviser Ajit Doval addressed the scientists too. Emphasising on the need to become the ‘winner’ and not the ‘runner up’ in defence technology, the NSA stated, “India’s security vulnerabilities are much greater today and they are going to be much greater in the times to come.”


Doval also stated that technology and finance are the two fields that influence geopolitics the most and the nations that have dominance in these two fields will win future conflicts.

“The armies that were better equipped always called the shots and decided the destiny of mankind. They were always the one which had higher technologies. India’s own historical experience on this has been sad, we were the runner-up. There is no trophy for the runner up,” said the National Security Adviser.

Ram Janmabhoomi case: Sunni Waqf Board may give up claim to title, but with conditions, lawyer denies knowledge

In a big development which could have massive ramifications on the Ram Janmabhoomi case, the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Waqf Board has decided to withdraw its petition on the last day of hearing. The Sunni Waqf Board has informed the Supreme Court through the mediation panel. However, this decision comes with conditions.

The Sunni Waqf Board has said that it will give up the claim and asked to make Place of Religious Worship Act 1991 watertight, government should take over maintenance of around 22 mosques in Ayodhya and Supreme Court should form a committee to check into status of other religious places under ASI’s control. Meanwhile, Sunni Waqf Board lawyer has said that he is unaware of any such statement. Zafaryab Jilani, the board’s lawyer, has denied having any such knowledge.

According to the reports, the decision to withdraw the petition comes amidst that a possible rift has broken out between members of the Sunni Waqf Board following FIRs against its chairman ZA Faruqui. The Uttar Pradesh government has recommended an inquiry by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against Faruqui into alleged illegal sale and purchase of land for the board.

Faruqui had reportedly attempted to change his Advocate-on-Record in the Ayodhya case. He allegedly also wrote to the mediation panel, asking for a fresh round of talks, without the knowledge of his legal team. As per sources, the mediators will submit a report before the top court intimating an “agreement” reached between a few parties to the Ayodhya dispute during the mediation.

Read: Islam is much more than Quran: Rajeev Dhawan representing Muslim side in Ram Janmabhoomi case says in Supreme Court

The Sunni Waqf Board has vehemently opposed the Hindu parties’ counsel from introducing fresh evidence. The Muslim parties have been contesting that the ASI report, that had confirmed the presence of a large structure at the Ram Janambhoomi site. However, they had to apologise to the Supreme Court after one of the counsels representing them had questioned the credibility of ASI reports.

The Muslim side represented by Sunni Waqf Board had also strongly contested Hindus’ side arguments terming the birthplace of Lord Ram under the central dome as a legal entity.  Muslim parties have argued that and is not Swayambhu, self-existing, whereas Kailash Mansarovar is an accurate example of manifestation.

CJI Ranjan Gogoi has said that today by 5 PM the hearing of the case would have to be concluded.

Shariat rules: No Halal certification to Pantanjali because of ‘Gaumutra’, no products from NE because ‘they eat anything’

A raging controversy about Halal vs Jhatka meat erupted in India when the famous food-chain McDonald’s pronounced that it only served halal meat to its customers. Following this declaration, questions were raised for its total disregard of the customers wanting to have ‘jhatka’ meat. Now, another controversy seems to be in the offing as ‘Halal India’, the halal certification body in India refused to certify Patanjali products stating that animal urine is proscribed from being granted halal status and some of the Patanjali products have cow urine as one of their ingredients.

Read: What is Halal meat? Only Muslims allowed from slaughter to labelling must chant Bismillah Allahu Akbar or meat becomes ‘non-Halal’

Halal is not limited only to the meat industry, even vegetarian products apply for halal certification. A vegetarian food item with ‘halal’ stamped on it means that the product is ‘halal certified’ and it contains no ingredients forbidden for Muslims by Shariat law. It is mandatory for all products to be halal certified, both meat food items and vegetarian food for their sale in International markets, predominantly Muslim countries.

In this regard, OpIndia spoke to the officials of Halal India. Regarding the question about the recent debate where a lady residing in Australia found the halal stamp on a packet of refined wheat flour, the official advocated the halal mark on the packet saying that ‘Halal’ means ‘Permissible’, that is, something which is ‘allowed to be consumed’. He further added that people have a misconception that halal is only related to the manner in which an animal is slaughtered. He said that only those products who don’t affect the health of a human being are given ‘Halal Certificate’. That is those things which do not harm the human body by their consumption.

However, the question here is, who decides that? Whether it is decided according to Ayurvedic rules or whether it is evaluated on a scientific basis, which item should be ‘halal certified’ or not or whether the body will be harmed by its consumption. While defending his organization, the official of Halal India said made a stunning revelation that all these things are decided pursuant to the Islamic law. He made it explicit that ‘halal’ is an Arabic word, so it should be clear that things here are decided based on the rules of ‘Sharia law’. That is, the Islamic Sharia law determines which food items are harmful to the body and which are not.

The official of ‘Halal India’ cited the example of ‘Haldiram’ to further enunciate his point. Talking about the products of ‘Haldiram’ company, he claimed that the company makes around 600 products but people are not aware of all of its products. He said that all the products of ‘Haldiram’ are recognized by ‘Halal India’.

Haldiram uses potatoes to make chips. Potato is grown in the fields, from there it goes to the factory and all kinds of other ingredients are mixed into it and chips are manufactured. The Halal India official was then asked to explain the role of Halal India in granting halal certification to Haldiram chips.

The official of ‘Halal India’ replied saying that ‘colour ingredients’ are also added to such chips products, that give them a special colour. These ‘colour ingredients’ can be synthetic or may have been brought from a place which is not considered correct according to the rules of ‘halal’. The official stated that ‘flavouring agents’ are also added to give flavour, which again may or may not be infringing the halal rules. ‘Halal India’ believes that it is forbidden for both Hindus and Muslims to eat pork, so any product that has even the slightest quantity of pork can never be given a ‘halal certificate,” he declared.

Read: Halalonomics is a deeper conspiracy than it seems: OpIndia talks to Ravi Ranjan Singh, Chairman of Jhatka Certification Authority

Responding to the question on what about those people belonging to different religion who do not consider consuming pork as a taboo and have different eating habits, not necessarily in compliance with Islam, the official said that the organization believes that pork or products derived from it can be used in the manufacturing of other food products and therefore, that food items may not be granted a halal certificate. The official, while describing the process of giving the halal certificate to vegetarian foods, said that his officers visit the factories to find out where the raw materials are procured from and based on their findings, the organisation decides if the product is to be certified or not.

Speaking about the culinary preferences of the people living in North-east India, the Halal India official said that people of the North-East eat snakes, scorpions and even dogs. He asserted that ‘Halal India’ does not consider granting a halal certificate to the food items of the people of North-east states because “those people eat anything”. He said that oil extracted from pork is also used in medicines, but they too cannot be given ‘Halal’ certificate.

About the question regarding the eligibility of Ayurvedic products for recognition from Halal India authority, the official said, “Patanjali approached us to seek ‘Halal Certification’ for its products but due to the presence of some problematic ingredients in their products this certificate could not be given to Baba Ramdev’s ‘Patanjali’. Most of his products are compliant to halal but we have a strong objection over one or two products. Islamic rules say that any animal’s urine if it is in a product, cannot be given a halal certificate. Some of Patanjali’s products contain cow urine and that’s why ‘Halal India’ did not recognize them. If they process cow urine products in a separate factory, then other products can be given a halal certificate.”

Read: Halal certification of vegetarian products: It’s no longer about choice but making others pay for your beliefs

In addition to this, the official of Halal India also told that even products with camel urine cannot be given a halal certificate. When asked if Halal India is only mindful of the feelings of Muslims, the official responded saying that people of Jain religion also live in India and they also have many laws and regulations regarding food and drink. He said that Jain people do not eat onion-garlic and keeping this in mind, there is a separate ‘Regulation Authority’ to certify foods. Halal India does the same for Indian Muslims, he added.

Halal India performs the entire scrutinization process under the supervision of the Sharia Board. The official informed that other international institutions also recognize the food and products recognized by Halal India in their respective countries. Halal India has signed MoU (agreements) with several countries including Singapore, Dubai and Saudi. It represents itself as an organization affiliated to the Government of India.

Though Halal India claims that it places significant importance on factors such as health, examines food products if it adversely affects human body before awarding halal certificate, his claims fall flat when asked if a product that is healthy for human beings but defies Islamic rules and regulations. On the question of if a product is not harmful, but Islamic rules and regulations do not permit it, the official said that even if the product is beneficial to one’s health, people of other religions use it, but the sanction of the halal certificate will be decided according to Islam.

Opindia also approached Patanjali. A female official working at Patanjali confirmed that it had indeed approached Halal India for securing halal certificates for its products. She mentioned that on all their products it is explicitly mentioned whether cow urine is used as one of the ingredients but still they were denied from being granted halal certificates. Opindia also spoke in detail with ‘Doctor Jhatka‘ on the issue of halal being foisted upon people. He said that the halal-certified food is Islamic halal and it is in accordance with the Islamic beliefs but is wrongly projected as universal halal. He also added that far from offering people a legitimate choice to decide between halal and jhatka meat, the government treats jhatka in a discriminating manner and even the Indian parliament offers only halal-certified meat.

Despite job loss rumours, Parle’s net profit rises 15.2% to Rs 410 crores in FY19: Report

Parle Biscuits, owned by the Parle Group has registered a 15.2 % year-on-year growth in net profit for the financial year 2018-19. As per a report in Business Standard, business platform Tofler has reported that Parle Biscuits’ net profit for FY19 is at Rs 410 crores.

Parle was also one of the biscuit manufacturers in India who had earlier asked the government for a cut in GST rates. As per the report, Parle had recorded a 315 crores profit in the last financial year. With this fiscal year’s profits, they have seen a jump of 15.5%.

The total revenues of the company have grown 6.4% year on year to a total of 9030 crores. The revenue from operations alone have grown nearly 6 per cent to Rs 8,780 crore from the previous year and other incomes have jumped 26 per cent to Rs 250 crore in the current fiscal year.

It is notable here that in August, many news reports had indicated that Parle may have to lay off thousands of employees due to slow growth and falling demands for entry-level biscuits, especially after the announcement of 18% GST rates for biscuits.

There was also an outrage by some sections in social media over the reports of job losses, blaming the nation’s economy for Parle Biscuit’s ‘fate’ but Parle’s senior category head Mayank Shah had clarified that there have been no job losses at Parle yet and that the issue has been blown out of proportion by naysayers.

Shah had, however, stated that the 18% GST slab is hurting the Biscuit brands below Rs 100.

Dismissing the reports of downsizing at Parle Products, Shah had said that the job losses will be an eventuality if the sales of the basic biscuits category continue to decline. Once the category which used to grow at 10-12 per cent per annum is currently declined by 7-8 per cent.

PMC Bank scam: Another PMC bank depositor dies of heart attack, second death within a day

A depositor of troubled Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative (PMC) Bank, Fattomal Punjabi has died of a heart attack on Tuesday, making it two deaths of depositors with the bank within the span of a day.

Reportedly, Punjabi, who had an account with the PMC bank’s Mulund branch, was part of the recent protests against the bank. He had spoken about his financial troubles to his friends because of the curbs placed on withdrawals by the Reserve Bank of India.

Punjabi’s death comes just a day after another depositor named Sanjay Gulati had died of a heart attack in Mumbai after failing to withdraw his life savings of Rs 90 lakh from the bank. Sanjay Gulati was a former employee of the now-defunct Jet Airways. He held an account in the Oshiwara branch of PMC Bank.

The RBI has put PMC Bank under stringent directions since last month, wherein withdrawals for the depositors have been capped. The limits were later increased to Rs 40,000 by the RBI on Monday and the central bank said 77 per cent of the depositors were now able to fully withdraw their deposits after easing.

Read: PMC Bank Scam: MD Joy Thomas became Junaid Khan, married his assistant per Islamic rituals and owned properties with her

In another case, a 39-year-old doctor Nivedita Bijlani, a depositor with scam-hit Punjab and Maharashtra (PMC) Bank has allegedly committed suicide at her residence in the Versova area of Mumbai, police said on Tuesday. However, the initial reports state that the suicide may not be related to the crisis at PMC Bank. “The cause of the suicide is yet to be ascertained. She had an account in PMC Bank but we don’t think it (death) was related to the crisis in the bank,” he said.

Reportedly, Nivedita Bijlani, a doctor staying with her father in Versova’s Model Town area, committed suicide after consuming a heavy dose of sleeping pills on Monday night. Bijlani had deposits of over Rs 1 crore with the bank. It is reported that Bijlani was suffering from depression for the past few years and had reportedly tried to commit suicide in March last year in the United States.

What is PMC crisis?

The Punjab and Maharashtra Cooperative (PMC) Bank is one of the largest cooperative banks, which was put under scrutiny by the Reserve Bank for fraud and misreporting of bad loans. Later, the bank had admitted that one large account, HDIL was the main reason for the current crisis.

Following this, the Mumbai Police’s EOW had arrested HDIL directors Sarang Wadhawan and Rakesh Kumar Wadhawan in connection with a fraud of over Rs 4,355 crores. According to the reports, PMC Bank officials gave loans to HDIL between the year 2008 and August 2019 despite the Wadhwans defaulting on previous loans. The Wadhawans along with other promoters including Waryam Singh have been sent to judicial custody till October 16.

NCP leader Praful Patel links to HDIL promoters:

On Tuesday, shocking details had emerged that had exposed links of former UPA Minister Praful Patel with HDIL promoters Rakesh and Sarang Wadhawan, who are currently embroiled in the PMC Bank scam.

The new documents had shown NCP leader and former UPA era minister Praful Patel’s name in numerous passenger manifests of an airline owned by the Wadhawans. The documents revealed that former UPA minister Praful Patel had used private jets connected to PMC scam accused to travel to various destinations from Mumbai.

Ram Janmabhoomi Case: Supreme Court likely to conclude arguments today

The Supreme Court is likely to conclude hearing in the much anticipated Ram Janmabhoomi – Babri Masjid title suit on Wednesday. A five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi had earlier asked for parties to conclude their arguments in the land dispute case to be concluded by October 17.

Ahead of the final day of the arguments, the historical city of Ayodhya has been turned into a fortress with heightened security. The Ayodhya administration has imposed Section 144 in the area till December 10 in anticipation of the Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid dispute verdict which is expected on November 17.

The bench also comprises of Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer, who are hearing appeals against the September 30, 2010, verdict of the Allahabad High Court.

Read: Section 144 imposed in Ayodhya in anticipation on Ram Janmabhoomi case verdict as the hearing enters its last week

The Allahabad High Court had delivered a judgement to divide the disputed 2.77 acres of land, including the spot where the Babri Masjid stood until December 6, 1992, and the area around it, equally among the Nirmohi Akhara, the Sunni Central Wakf Board, UP, and Ramlalla Virajman.

The Supreme Court has been carrying out day-to-day hearing of the case and the arguments were to be concluded by 18th October but then, October 17 was given the last date for arguments. The Supreme Court had earlier warned that the parties will not be given any extra day. Now it is likely that the arguments will be concluded today.

Chief Justice Gogoi had pointed out that the bench will have just have four weeks to write and deliver the judgment once arguments conclude. “It will be miraculous if the top court can write judgment in the remaining time given the amount of materials parties have given,” he said.

Read: Modi government’s petition in Ram Janmabhoomi case: A simple yet potent step towards construction of Ram Temple

As CJI Gogoi ordered for the earliest completion of the arguments, an early Supreme Court decision on the issue of Ram temple can be expected. Incidentally, the Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi’s term as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court will come to end on November 17. Reportedly, there is a possibility that a decision may be taken in the Ram Temple case before the Chief Justice Gogoi retires.

Recently, senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, representing the Muslim parties had gone an apologising spree to the court after another advocate representing Muslim parties – Meenakshi Arora had questioned the ASI report.

The Supreme Court of India had lost its patience with the counsel representing parties in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case and had reprimanded them, particularly Rajeev Dhavan representing the Muslim parties for constantly repeating their arguments. Later, once again Rajiv Dhavan apologised for interrupting the other side from making any arguments.

Ambala: ‘Doorbell out of order, please chant Modi Modi’, people in Muslim neighbourhood put up posters outside their homes

As the campaign for the assembly elections in Haryana heats up, people in a Muslim locality in Ambala have used an innovative method to campaign for BJP. People in the area have pasted posters outside their houses saying ‘doorbell is out of order, to get the door opened please shout Modi-Modi’ in Hindi.

Talking to media about the posters, the Muslim people living in the area said that ahead of the elections on 21st October, candidates for the assembly constituency are visiting the households asking for their votes. The candidates and their representatives keep ringing the doorbells on the homes. Therefore the poster has been put for those candidates, so that they don’t press the doorbell, and doors will be opened only for those who chant Modi-Modi.

poster in Ambala saying chant Modi instead of pressing doorbell
The poster outside a home

Women in the Muslim Basti said that the way Modi has passed the triple talaq bill, it is a very big issue for them. Because some people in their community used to divorce their wives even through phones using the practice of instant triple talaq as per Sharia laws, but this will not happen. They said that the incident of divorce will go down due to the fear of law and police.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbStTv6kqYc]

Also Read: Anti-India posters disguised as pro-India come up on streets of Islamabad, removed by police

On the other hand, others in the area said that they have put up the posters because their vote will be for Narendra Modi only. Modi has done a lot of work for them, hence they are supporting him, they said. Schemes launched by Modi government like Ayushman Scheme, Ujjwala scheme etc have benefitted them immensely, and their vote is for Modi only. Therefore, they don’t want candidates from any other party knocking at their doors asking for votes.

After links with Dawood Ibrahim established, Praful Patel defends D-Company, calls them ‘tax payers’ not terrorists

Hours after the Enforcement Directorate established links between the UPA era Civil Aviation Minister, Praful Patel and Dawood’s aide Iqbal Memon alias ‘Mirchi’ after they zeroed in the properties of Memon, Praful Patel has spoken in defence of D-company calling them ‘tax-payers’ and not terrorists.

Today the NCP leader and former Union Minister Praful Patel addressed a  press conference, where he was heard defending Hajrah Memon, wife of Iqbal Mirchi by saying that if the government agencies had any reason to believe that Hajrah Memon was an undesirable person, it should have been duly notified then. In her defence, Praful Patel audaciously goes on to say that Hajrah is an “income tax-payer” hinting that she, who is actually the kin of the key aide of the fugitive gangster Dawood Ibrahim, is a law-abiding citizen of India.

Defending his signatures on the documents accessed by ED that linked him to Iqbal Memon, Praful Patel goes on to say that in 2007 the Supreme Court had restored Hajrah Memon’s passport and lifted travel restrictions on Hajra Memon indicating that she was not a terrorist but an ordinary citizen.


This statement is extremely caustic and blatant considering UPA had earlier argued that Hajrah Memon was a ‘national security risk’.

Meanwhile, yesterday, OpIndia had accessed documents which validated NCP leader and former Union Minister Praful Patel’s financial dealings and direct links with one of the most wanted criminals Dawood Ibrahim and his associates.

We had earlier reported regarding the massive crackdown launched by Enforcement Directorate on the properties linked to Iqbal Memon alias ‘Mirchi’, who had in turn linked to former UPA-era civil aviation minister Praful Patel and his wife Varsha Patel through property deals.

The ED came to know of such a link between Praful Patel and Dawood’s aide Memon after they had zeroed in the properties of Memon alias ‘Mirchi’. While tracking Mirchi’s business ventures and properties in India and the UK, the ED has discovered links with a firm that is linked to Praful Patel and his wife Varsha Patel.

According to the list of Mirchi’s properties located in India and the UK, A 15-story building in Dr Annie Besant Road, Worli, named ‘Ceejay House’ was constructed as a JV between Mirchi and M/S Millenium Developers Pvt Ltd in 2006-07. In 2007, the third and fourth floors of the building were given to Mirchi’s family by Millenium Developers.

Former Union Minister Praful Patel and his wife Varsha Patel own a significant number of shares in Millenium Developers Pvt Ltd. In the documents, the 12th floor of the CeeJay House is mentioned as the address of Praful and Varsha Patel. It is notable here that NCP leader Praful Patel’s family owns the CeeJay Group, a large tobacco conglomerate in India.

The revelations followed the arrest of Mirchi’s two close aides — former chairman of Sir Mohammed Yusuf Trust Haroun Yusuf and real-estate broker Ranjeet Singh Bindra. The ED arrested them on Friday.

The ED has named Mirchi as an international drug dealer, smuggler, extortionist and criminal involved in anti-national interest. In 2004, Mirchi was listed as one of the foreign drug kingpins by the US state department. He had an Interpol red corner notice against him. Mirchi had died in the UK on 14 August 2013.

Mirchi and his family members had amassed huge wealth in India and abroad. The family had fled to Dubai and had shifted their empire overseas. Haroun Yusuf, chairman of Mirchi’s trust has been named by ED as the facilitator of many of the shady property deals. The ED has listed 25 properties in the UK owned by Mirchi’s family and business partners.