Home Blog Page 6254

Amit Shah intervenes as Owaisi heckles BJP MP during NIA Amendment Bill discussion, asks AIMIM MP to ‘get in habit of listening’

Union Home Minister Amit Shah today came down heavily on AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi during the discussion on NIA Amendment Bill in the Parliament. The assembly was discussing the bill to strengthen the National Investigation Agency. The opposition, however, was spooked by the amendments and tried to give it a communal spin.


When BJP MP Dr Satya Pal Singh was speaking how certain terror cases were politicised when it did not suit the political party. Citing an example of the Mecca Masjid blast case from Hyderabad, Dr Singh said that the chief minister had intervened when some of the suspects were found to be of the minority community. Without naming the chief minister he was referring, to Dr Singh said that he had asked the police commissioner to not do anything ‘otherwise you will lose your job’

At this point, AIMIM MP from Hyderabad, Asaduddin Owaisi interrupted the BJP MP. He insisted that the BJP MP should provide proof for the above conversation.

Union Minister Amit Shah took a dig at the opposition and said that suddenly Owaisi and other people’s secularism is overflowing. “When A Raja was speaking why didn’t you interrupt him? You should not have different yardsticks. You should also learn to listen, you will have to listen,” Shah said.

The Lok Sabha has passed the NIA (Amendment Bill), 2019.

Were England wrongly awarded 6 runs instead of 5 from the overthrow in the final over in the World Cup final?

As the high-octane edge of the seat thriller contest between England and New Zealand in the cricket World Cup drew to an end, with England barely scraping out a victory, many cricket enthusiasts started debating the umpires’ decision to award 6 runs to the hosts amidst the topsy-turvy scenes of Trent Boult’s final over to Ben Stokes in their chase.

On the fourth delivery of the final over, as Stokes’ desperately dived off to complete the second run, a throw from the deep midwicket ricocheted off Ben Stokes’ bat towards the unguarded third-man boundary. After discussion with his fellow partner, Kumar Dharmasena signalled six runs, 2 runs scored by the batsman and 4 runs from the overthrow boundary, effectively bringing the equation for England well within their reach. From needing 9 from 3 balls, England now needed only 3 from 2 balls.

As per Law 19.2, concerning “Overthrow or wilful act of fielder”, it would seem that the umpires should not have awarded the second run to England, making it a total of five runs for the incident, not six. The law states: “If the boundary is conceded from an overthrow or from the wilful act of a fielder, the runs scored shall be any runs for penalties awarded to either side, and the allowance for the boundary, and the runs completed by the batsmen, together with the run in progress if they had already crossed at the instant of the throw or act.”

The last part of the clause is vital in determining how much runs can be awarded in an event that a boundary is conceded of an overthrow or fielder’s willful action. A close evaluation of the footage of the incident reveals that, at the instance the ball was released by the New Zealand fielder, Martin Guptill, Stokes and his partner, Adil Rashid, had not yet crossed for their second run.

There is a certain level of obscurity in the wording of the law. The references throw or “act” may relate to the moment that the ball deflected off Stokes’ bat too. However, there is no reference to the batsman’s actions at any other point in the law.

Former ICC umpire Simon Taufel declared that there was a clear “error of judgment” by the on-field umpires in the last over of the England chase’s against New Zealand in the World Cup final and said that England should not have been awarded 6 runs.

Wrestler Yogeshwar Dutt calls TikTok users who threatened to unleash violence against Hindus as ‘rabid dogs’, urges strict action against them

Responding to a grossly abusive video uploaded by apparently two Muslims threatening dire consequences for Hindus following the unfortunate death of Tabrez Ansari, wrestler Yogeshwar Dutt dubbed them as “rabid dogs” who are in need of urgent attention. He also cautioned that if such people are not treated effectively, situation in the country might quickly deteriorate.


In a video, which was shared by journalist Madhu Purnima Kishwar, two agitated Muslim youths can be seen voicing abusive and communally sensitive remarks against the majority community of India for what they perceived was behind the custodial death of Tabrez Ansari. In a menacingly supremacist rant against Hindus, the two truculent men asserted that it was because of Muslims that India is a civilised state and if they are given a free rein for 10 mins, they would show what they are capable of achieving.

The video was uploaded on popular video sharing app TikTok by an account that goes by @danishkhan62727. Along with a score of derogatory and bigoted remarks peppered universally across the 1 minute span of video, the youths in the video said, “We have created this video to speak against our brother Tabrez Ansari’s death. The government might be yours but we still rule the land. Muslims definitely have a greater advantage on others. We have a glorious past that stands testimony to the fact. If you want to fight, declare a war against us. Why are you afraid of granting us 15 mins of free rein? Give us 10 mins, we will finish off your children as well.”

According to the Police, people had gotten into a fight with Ansari on 18th June who was accused of trying to steal a bike. After police got information about the same, they reached the spot and rescued him. Police had also recovered the stolen bike and some other items. The Police gave him first aid, subjected him to a medical examination and then submitted the report to the Court, only then he was sent to jail. Three days later, his health deteriorated and he died.

Kerala CPM chief’s son skips DNA test in rape case, refuses to give blood sample citing illness

Binoy Kodiyeri, son of Kerala CPM chief Kodiyeri Balakrishnan, skipped giving samples for his DNA test today. Binoy said that he couldn’t give his blood sample as he was sick.

Last Wednesday, Binoy got anticipatory bail from the Dindoshi sessions court. However, the court has ordered him to take a DNA test. The DNA test would be the first and final evidence which will decide the fate of the case.

As a condition for the bail, he was required to appear before the investigations officer of Oshiwara police station every Monday for one month. He would be required to stay at the station from 10 am to 1 pm.

Reportedly, Binoy had arrived at the Oshiwara station today and was questioned for 30 mins by the investigating officer in the case. He had told the officer that he was sick and wouldn’t able to provide the blood sample. He had even produced a medical certificate. He had also said that he was ready to cooperate with the investigations.

Binoy would now be required to provide his blood sample next Monday.

Binoy Kodiyeri was booked in a rape case over a complaint filed by a 33-year-old woman. Mumbai Police registered a case against Binoy after the woman alleged that he had raped her repeatedly over a decade under the pretext of marrying her. The woman had also alleged that she was kept in dark regarding Binoy’s marital status. The woman also has an eight-year-old son who she claims was fathered by Binoy.

After the complaints, Binoy had absconded from the Mumbai Police. The police had even issued a look-out notice for him.

Hearing about the trouble Binoy was going through, a journalist from Kerala O Abdulla had invited Binoy Kodiyeri, son of Kerala CPM chief Kodiyeri Balakrishnan, to join Islam as a solution to the current rape charges that he is facing reports News18.

Kumaraswamy government in Karnataka to take floor test on Thursday to prove majority in the Assembly

Amidst the ongoing political crisis in Karnataka that has been threatening the stability of the 13-month-old coalition government of Congress and JD(S), the Kumaraswamy government will face the floor test on July 18 at 11 am.


Karnataka Congress leader Siddaramaiah had announced earlier today that the Kumaraswamy government will prove its majority in the State Assembly tomorrow but it was yet to be confirmed by the Speaker. The Assembly Speaker K R Ramesh had said that he would take a decision regarding the floor test only after the Supreme Court order tomorrow. But now the speaker has decided that the floor test will take place at 11 am on Thursday.

The Supreme Court had ordered the Speaker and the rebel MLAs on July 12 to maintain status quo regarding the resignations and disqualification of the MLAs till July 16 when the next hearing is scheduled to happen. Following the Supreme Court order of status quo, Chief Minister H D Kumaraswamy had announced in the State Assembly the same day that he intended to prove majority.

The Supreme Court had asked the Speaker on 11th July to take a decision on the resignations of rebel Congress-JD(S) MLAs. However, the Speaker did not take any decision after which the Supreme Court had passed the order of maintaining the status quo.

Sixteen MLAs belonging to the ruling Congress-JD(S) coalition in Karnataka has resigned, plunging the government into crisis. 14 of the rebel MLAs are currently staying in Mumbai. The rulling coalition has 116 members including 78 Congress, 37 JD(S) and 1 BSP and 1 speaker. If the resignations are accepted, the coalition number will reduce to 100, which will mean BJP will have majority with 105 MLAs.

Deputy CM of Bihar announces financial assistance of Rs 1.5 lakh for sex reassignment surgeries

Sushil Kumar Modi, the Deputy Chief Minister of Bihar, has announced that the state government will grant Rs. 1.5 lakh to people who wish to undergo sex correction operations. The state government has also constituted a Kinnar Kalyan Board for the development of the Transgender community.


The announcement comes at a time when the state government has been facing great criticism for its utter inability to deal effectively with the Acute Encephalitis crisis. The medical infrastructure in the state has come under intense scrutiny. Over a hundred children had succumbed to the disease in recent weeks.

The state also suffers from malnutrition to a great extent which contributed to the devastating extent of the tragedy in a significant manner.

There also doesn’t appear to be any scientific evidence to suggest that sex change operations, or sex reassignment surgeries (SRS) as they are often called, benefits the person in any manner. In fact, the only long-term study that was conducted on the matter showed that transgenders who underwent SRS reported a higher rate of depression and suicidal tendencies when compared to those who had not. Numerous other healthcare professionals have voiced similar concerns.

Under such circumstances, that the Bihar government is funding potentially life-threatening medical procedures without any solid scientific basis for its supposed benefits using the taxpayers’ money at a time when the state’s healthcare infrastructure requires urgent upgrades is a matter of great concern. Before Bihar, Kerala and Tamil Nadu too had started providing free sex correction operations to people.

Karnataka now, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan tomorrow: Who saves Congress?

Critics are bemused, fans dismayed as Congress goes on a political ventilator. Vital organs (top leaders) and arteries (regional leaders) are giving up. Deep coma of a few decades, beckon. Can it survive?

When the patient is in ICU, it allows surgeons to do what is best. The trouble is these surgeons—Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi-Vadra—can’t pick up the tools on the table.  All surgical tables have three types of instruments: (a) Cutting instruments like scissors, surgical blades, knives etc; (b) Grasping or holding instruments like forceps; and (c) Retractors, to hold the tissues and look at malaise which is beneath. Our surgeons, however, can’t feel a twitch in their frames.

One of the surgeons did make his move early. Rahul Gandhi resigned and resigned while an assortment of assistants wailed and vowed to prevail against his resolve. Priyanka Gandhi-Vandra was beholden to this virtuous man who was her brother. Mamma darling, meanwhile, pursed her lips and awaited for the inevitable offer to land on her shoulders which age and illness have slumped. What next?

Enter Congress Working Committee (CWC). This is the club of the comatose whose prime office-bearers are no other than our three surgeons. The rest are made up of walking corpses, ghosts too benign to affect a single voter and vultures who despite cleanest of clothes, trimmed beards and dyed pates, are only for interface with a servile media.

Thus our surgeons and this august club are interchangeable. The club would only do what the surgeons ask them to do. So this club could accept the resignations of Scindias and Deoras but would dither on Rahul Gandhi. It would never say no to flying resignations in the room from Telangana, Goa or Karnataka.  Maybe both the surgeons and the club should quit and replant a new setup.

Easier said than done. The precedent itself is sobering. It was once attempted in 1992, the first Congress’ organizational elections in two decades. Narasimha Rao emerged as the party president. A new CWC and All-India Congress Committee (AICC) were constituted in Tirupathi. New office-bearers and committees were constituted for two years. However, two years later in 1994, nobody quit. No fresh elections took place. The posts and its occupants were given an “indefinite extension.”

So fresh organizational elections within the Party would fool no-one. It might encourage factionalism and multiple splits to occur. Young Turks already have their hat in the ring and are smelling blood in the pool. Older ones—sample Ashok Gehlot who says Rajasthan wanted him as CM—are drawing whatever strength they could from the imbeciles like them. Nobody is losing sight that four assembly elections are slated within next few months.

Meanwhile there are practical issues too. In case both Rahul Gandhi and CWC go in a limbo, who strikes alliances and keeps regional dissidence in check? Kerala and Tamil Nadu might not be immediate issues; but what about 16 other states where they have been hammered like nails into the wall. Even the loyalists like Navjot Singh Sidhu are making public their resignations to the Congress president Rahul Gandhi: the same man who once promised to quit if Gandhi lost in Amethi.

The dark clouds of Karnataka are portending something far more sinister. This is model which would replicate itself in Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan soon. MLAs would quit and the nebulous hold of the Party would be evident. The same routine of assembly Speaker holding firm, “sticking” to Constitutional values, Supreme Court nudging him to the inevitable collapse, would occur.

Another step and Congress is off the cliff. A few self-serving individuals have driven the Grand Old Party to its moment of truth. It’s a sitting duck to the winds of change. It lied on Rafale and economy and the poor didn’t buy their “Nyaya” lollipop. It ranted and railed against Narendra Modi and it didn’t work. It’s cry on “democracy”; “idea of India” and “secular values” only earned snides. That’s why the patient is left with its final few breaths. It could be born again but for that it has to die first. The point is who pulls the plug?

Since 2014, Modi government has forced 312 govt officials to retire over corruption and inefficiency

Last week, the government had informed the Lok Sabha that as many as 312 government officials have been either compulsorily retired, or been listed for retirement over corruption and inefficient work between July 2014 and May 2019.

Minister of State for Personnel Jitendra Singh said this in a reply to the question posed by DMK leader A Raja. A Raja wanted to know whether the government had ordered compulsory retirement to officials across the country.

The minister said that the decision was taken after reviewing the work of about 1.2 lakh officials both at the Group A and Group B levels. The retirement was recommended for 125 Group A officers and 187 from Group B.

The minister has said according to the provisions of FR 56(j)(i), Rule 48 of the Central Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972, and Rule 16(3) (Amended ) of the All India Services (Death-cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958 the government has absolute right to prematurely retire officials on grounds of lack of integrity and ineffectiveness in public interest.

Using the provisions, the government had reviewed the performance records of 36,756 Group A and 82,654 Group B officers.

Last month, days after sacking a handful of tainted officers from service, the Modi government passed a directive to all departments and ministries to prepare monthly reports identifying officials facing charges of corruption and other wrongdoing against them.

Yesterday, it was reported that Modi government 2.0 has shortlisted 167 ‘transformative ideas’ and has set an internal target of 100 days to implement the plan. The first 100 days of the Modi government’s second stint would be completed on October 15, 2019.

Fact-check: Did the Modi govt concede the NSCN demands of a separate constitution, passport and flag for Nagaland

Amidst ongoing negotiations between the Government of India and the NSCN(IM), reports had surfaced that the GOI had agreed to the eight-point charter of demands put forth by the Isak Muivah faction of the NSCN.

The demands were reported to include a separate constitution for Nagaland, separate passports and a separate flag. National Herald, the Congress mouthpiece, also peddled the rumours that the Government of India had conceded to the NSCN(IM)’s demands for a separate constitution and flag.

However, Deputy National Security Advisor (NSA) and Centre’s Representative and Interlocutor for Naga peace talks, R.N. Ravi, has rubbished these reports. He told the Nagaland Post, one of the most widely circulated newspapers in the state, “These are all mischievous rumours. There is nothing in it.”

Ravi maintained that the demands for a separate constitution and flag remain unresolved. He further stated that negotiations were still undergoing and the final agreement could be signed at the earlier if the “Naga negotiators reciprocated with pragmatic flexibilities”.

The demands by the NSCN(IM) are longstanding demands of the Naga terrorists. Apart from separate flag and constitution, they want greater Nagalim which includes large parts of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh and Manipur. The neighbouring states are vociferously opposed to the idea of the Nagalim. No Indian government has, thus far, entertained the notions of conceding to these demands. It appears extremely unlikely that the current NDA government will even consider conceding to such far-fetched demands.

TMC lawmaker Mahua Moitra files a criminal defamation case against Zee News journalist Sudhir Chaudhary

After being put on the high pedestal by the ‘Liberal left’ for her rather prosaic maiden speech on ‘Seven Signs of Fascism’ in the Lok Sabha, TMC MP Mahua Moitra has now filed criminal defamation against journalist Sudhir Chaudhary for alleging that her June 25 speech was highly plagiarised.

Acting on the complaint filed by TMC MP, Metropolitan Magistrate Preeti Parewa today placed the matter for July 20. The statement of Mahua Moitra will be recorded on that date.

Representing Moitra, counsel Shadaan Farasat asserted that Moitra’s speech was inspired by a famous Holocaust poster in a United States museum. The poster read 14 signs of early fascism. Moitra borrowed the concept and couched it in the Indian context, her counsel argued. Farasat also contended that even while adopting the idea from the Holocaust poster, Moitra mentioned the source from where her speech was inspired from.

Sudhir Chaudhary, on Zee News, ran a broadcast in which he alleged that Mahua Moitra had plagiarised her “hate-filled speech” given in Parliament. Chaudhary also claimed that the views expressed by Moitra were not of her own but were ‘copy-pasted’ from an article written by Martin Longman in reference to US President Donald Trump.


Earlier, Moitra had tried to browbeat Chaudhary by submitting a breach of privilege motion against Chaudhary claiming that he had falsely reported her maiden address in the lower house of the parliament. However, the Lok Sabha speaker Om Birla did not accept the breach of privilege motion submitted by the Trinamool MP then.

Flustered by the negative response from the Lok Sabha speaker, Mahua Moitra had then resorted to abusing media and journalists claiming that she had not stolen the speech. After parliamentary privilege didn’t yield the intended result, Moitra has now employed legal means to intimidate a journalist from performing his duty freely.