Home Blog Page 638

Pakistan-trained Tehreek-ul-Mujahideen terrorist Javed Munshi arrested near Bangladesh border in West Bengal

0

Acting on a tip-off, a team from the Special Task Force (STF) of the West Bengal Police apprehended a Pakistan-trained militant near the Indo-Bangladesh border in the Canning area of West Bengal’s South 24 Parganas district.

The police identified the militant as Javed Munshi, who was arrested on Saturday. Munshi had reportedly arrived in the Canning area a few days earlier, intending to exfiltrate into Bangladesh under instructions from Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) operatives, the police stated.

Javed Munshi, an expert in IEDs and weapons handling, is affiliated with the banned terrorist organisation Tehreek-ul-Mujahideen (TuM). He has a history of involvement in terror-related activities, including his alleged role in the 2011 murder of Shaukat Shah, a leader of the Ahl-i-Hadith, and has served multiple jail terms on terrorism-related charges.

During preliminary interrogation, Munshi admitted to having visited Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan multiple times using fake Pakistani passports, acting on the instructions of his handlers. He is also wanted by the Jammu and Kashmir Police.

The arrested individual has been handed over to the Jammu and Kashmir Police, who will take him back to Kashmir on a transit remand to facilitate further investigation.

This operation underscores the ongoing efforts of the West Bengal Police to secure the state’s borders and mitigate potential threats to national security, according to police officials.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Samajwadi Party MLA calls BJP a ‘Hindu terrorist organisation,’ later denies statement despite viral video

On 21st December, Samajwadi Party (SP) MLA Suresh Yadav stirred controversy with his remarks, labelling the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) a “Hindu terrorist organisation”. His remarks came during a protest in Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, against the ruling party for Home Minister Amit Shah’s comments on B.R. Ambedkar in the Lok Sabha.

Notably, HM Shah’s Lok Sabha speech was trimmed in a way that made it appear as though he was insulting Ambedkar. Detailed fact-check on the controversy can be checked here.

As Yadav’s remarks drew criticism, he issued a clarification, claiming he did not make any such statement despite videos of his speech going viral on social media.

What is the controversy about?

A protest was organised at the Sugarcane Institute in Barabanki by the SP and Congress on 21st December against HM Shah’s remarks on Ambedkar. During the protest, Yadav launched a scathing attack on the BJP. He claimed that the BJP is a “Hindu terrorist organisation” aiming to destroy the democratic fabric of the country and insult the legacy of great leaders. A video of his remarks was widely shared on social media.

The BJP condemned the statement, terming it irresponsible. National spokesperson of the BJP, Shehzad Poonawalla, accused the SP of harbouring anti-Hindu sentiments and promoting divisive rhetoric. He called for an apology from the SP leader.

Suresh Yadav’s clarification

Following the backlash, Yadav issued a clarification and denied the allegations. He claimed that the viral video was doctored. He said, “I have been a legislator for several terms and know what to say and what not to say.” Accusing political opponents of conspiring against him by editing the video, he said, “I categorically deny making such remarks.”

Who is Suresh Yadav and his history of controversies?

Suresh Yadav is an SP MLA from the Sadar constituency of Barabanki. He is well known for making controversial statements. Yadav is a close aide of SP chief Akhilesh Yadav and has frequently found himself in the midst of controversies. Notably, his family has also faced legal troubles. His brother, Dharmendra Yadav, was charged under the Gangster Act, with properties worth over ₹1 crore seized, including luxury vehicles and real estate.

Additionally, Yadav’s nephew, Arjun Yadav, who is Dharmendra Yadav’s son, was also booked under the Gangster Act. Dharmendra Yadav’s two marriages have reportedly resulted in frequent family feuds, including incidents of violence that have drawn police intervention. Such legal and personal controversies have kept the family in the spotlight.

Professor alleges ‘caste discrimination’, institute says promotion denied due to harassment charges: Here is what’s happening in IIM-Bangalore

The Indian Institute of Management (Bangalore) has come under the scanner over an alleged case of ‘caste-based discrimination.’

An Associate Professor of marketing at the centrally funded business school, Dr Gopal Das has accused the IIM-B officials of discriminating against him on the basis of caste.

Dr Das has alleged that he was denied ‘equal opportunities’ at the esteemed institution. He had registered his complaint with the President of India Droupadi Murmu during her visit to IIM-B in January this year.

DCRE claims to find ‘evidence’ of caste discrimination

Following directives from the Office of the President, an inquiry was initiated into the matter by the Directorate of Civil Rights Enforcement (DCRE) of the Karnataka government in March 2024.

DCRE claimed to have found ‘evidence’ of caste discrimination and denial of equal opportunity by senior officials at IIM-Bangalore.

The officials include Dr Rishikesha T Krishnan (Director), Dr Dinesh Kumar (Dean), Dr Devi Prasad Shetty (Chairman of the Board of Governors), Profesor Rahul De, Professor Sreelata Jonnalagedda, Professor Ashish Mishra, and Professor Chetan Subramanian.

Additional Director General of Police (ADGP) Arun Chakravarthy claimed, “Evidence indicates that Dr. Rishikesha T. Krishnan, Director of IIM-B, publicly disclosed Dr. Gopal Das’s caste through a mass email, leading to allegations of huDCRE filed its inquiry report with Karnataka’s Department of Social Welfare on 26th November 2024.

Karnataka Congress govt wants IIM-B officials booked under SC/ST Act

It further accused IIM-B officials of ‘not establishing institutional mechanism’ to address the grievances of SC/ST employees.

On 9th December this year, the Department of Social Welfare directed the Bengaluru Police Commissioner to initiate action against 6 officials of IIM- B (barring Dr Devi Shetty who secured a stay on proceedings from Karnataka High Court).

The Congress government in Karnataka has now recommended booking the officials under the stringent Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 2015.

IIM-B debunks outrageous claims of ‘caste discrimination’

According to the Indian Institute of Management (Bangalore), Dr Gopal Das has been working at the business school since 2018.

The officials clarified that although he applied for the position of Assistant Professor, he was appointed as an Associate Professor based on his credentials.

It further added that Dr Gopal Das was made part of several committees and entrusted with other responsibilities like the chairmanship of the Institutional Review Board.

IIM-B highlighted that the denial of his promotion was based on harassment charges filed by doctoral students and had nothing to do with his caste.

“Dr. Das’s allegations of discrimination against the Institute and its faculty arose only when his application for promotion was put on hold due to complaints of harassment lodged by some doctoral students against him,” it stated.

The officials further added, “An inquiry conducted by IIMB, as per the rules, with a committee that included a reputed academic from the SC category from an eminent institution, found that the students’ complaints were justified.”

They pointed out, “The Diversity and Inclusion Grievance Redressal Committee (DIGRC) found Dr. Das’s complaints of harassment and discrimination to be unfounded.“

The Indian Institute of Management (Bangalore) had submitted all evidence to the DCRE, which did not consider them.

‘Cruelty is terrorists hiding behind children’: Israel slams Pope Francis’ address

0

Israel’s Foreign Ministry swiped back at Pope Francis, whose Christmas address criticized Israeli airstrikes in Gaza as “cruelty.”

“Cruelty is terrorists hiding behind children while trying to murder Israeli children; cruelty is holding 100 hostages for 442 days, including a baby and children, by terrorists and abusing them,” the Foreign Ministry said on Saturday night.

“Unfortunately, the Pope has chosen to ignore all of this, as well as the fact that Israel’s actions have targeted terrorists who used children as human shields,” the Foreign Ministry said. “The pope’s remarks are particularly disappointing as they are disconnected from the true and factual context of Israel’s fight against jihadist terrorism — a multi-front war that was forced upon it starting on October 7.”

The Pope opened his annual address to Catholic cardinals on Saturday by remarking, “Yesterday, children were bombed. This is cruelty. This is not war. I wanted to say this because it touches the heart.”

The comments follow a recent controversy over a Nativity scene at the Vatican which featured baby Jesus wrapped in a Palestinian keffiyeh. Images of Pope Francis inaugurating the scene on Dec. 7 created a backlash. Israel’s Diaspora Affairs and Combating Antisemitism Minister Amichai Chikli accused the pontiff of perpetuating a “dangerous blood libel” against Israel and distorting history.
The scene was removed days later without explanation.

In November, the Pope raised Israeli ire for calling for an investigation of Israeli “war crimes” and “genocide” in Gaza.

At least 1,200 people were killed, and 252 Israelis and foreigners were taken hostage in Hamas’s attacks on Israeli communities near the Gaza border on October 7. Of the 97 remaining hostages, more than 30 have been declared dead. Hamas has also been holding captive two Israeli civilians since 2014 and 2015, and the bodies of two soldiers killed in 2014.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Will buying second-hand cars now cost more? Read what the recent changes in GST on used cars mean for buyers

On Saturday, the Goods and Services Tax Council decided to make the GST on used cars uniform for businesses. As per the new rule, the GST payable for the purchase and sale of all kinds of used cars will be 18%, which was earlier 12% for some categories of cars. Moreover, the GST for used Electric Vehicles has also been raised to 18%.

However, the individuals buying or selling used vehicles will need to pay GST at the existing rate of 12%.

The GST on used cars has attracted strong opposition from opposition parties, with AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal alleging that govt is breaking the dreams of the middle class by increasing taxes on old vehicles. He alleged that “BJP government at the center is working only for the rich and industrialists.”

It is notable that the GST Council is comprised of finance ministers from all the states, apart from the union govt’s representatives. For voting in the Council, the centre’s vote weightage is 33.33%, while the rest 66.67% comes from the states, including opposition-ruled states. All decisions of the GST council must be approved by a minimum of three-fourths of weighted votes (75%) of the members present and voting.

Therefore, it is wrong to blame only the central govt or the union finance minister for the decision. It was approved through voting by states and the centre.

Now coming to the GST on used cars, it is important to note that this is not a new provision, the tax was already there on buying and selling of used cars. This GST is payable by used car dealers, and the tax is calculated only on the margin the used car dealer makes, not the total price of the car.

For example, if a used car dealer buys an old car for ₹5 lakh and sells it for ₹5.5 lakh, the GST payable will be 18% of the margin ₹50,000, which will be ₹9,000. But if such a transaction is done by an individual and not by a business establishment like a dealer, the GST rate will be 12%.

Earlier, the GST on used ‘small vehicles’, which is vehicles below the length of 4000 mm and engine capacity below 1200cc, was 12%, while the vehicles with above this numbers were already taxed 18%. For diesel vehicles and SUVs the engine size limit was 1500cc. This means, now the 12% slab for used cars has been removed, and all used cars will attract 18% GST.

Therefore, if we take the above example, the earlier GST for a car below 1200cc bought from a dealer was 12% or ₹6,000, and now it will be 18% or ₹9,000, representing a hike of ₹3,000. Although any hike in price is not desirable from the consumer’s point of view, the hike for most cars bought by middle-class individuals will not be prohibitive.

Most people in India buy entry to mid-level cars, costing below ₹10 lakh. As the price for used cars will be much less, the additional GST for the purchase of such used cars will also not be much.

It is notable that the 18% GST on used cars remains lower than the GST on new fuel-powered cars, which is 28%. Larger cars also attract additional cess at various rates based on size and engine capacity, and total tax on a new vehicle can go up to 50% for diesel SUVs above 1500cc and longer than 4 metres.

However, the inclusion of used electric vehicles in the 18% bracket is surprising, as at present the GST on new EVs is 5%. This represents an anomaly as the tax is now much higher on used electric vehicles compared to new EVs, which is not the case with fossil fuel vehicles.

Delhi Police step up efforts to identify, deport illegal Bangladeshi immigrants

0

Delhi Police has stepped up efforts to identify, detain and repatriate Bangladeshi immigrants living in the National Capital, without valid documentation.

“In response to growing concerns about the illegal stay of Bangladeshi immigrants residing in the country without any valid Indian document, the Outer District Police has stepped up efforts to identify, detain and repatriate individuals living in National Capital, Delhi without valid documentation,” as per an official release.

A series of operations/joint checking have recently been conducted in the jurisdiction of the Outer District.

“Dedicated teams from Police Stations and Special Units including District Foreigner Cell officials were formed to carry out intensive searches and gather information to trace illegal Bangladeshi Immigrants across the district,” the release read.

During these operations/joint checkings, door-to-door checkings have been conducted.

175 individuals have been found to be under suspicion residing in the jurisdiction of Outer District. Thorough interrogations have been conducted and their documents have also been carefully checked and verified. Teams were sent to their native places to authenticate their identities in coordination with the local police in their respective areas, the release read.

This comes amid claim over illegal Bangladeshi immigrants in the national capital.

On December 15, Delhi Chief Minister Atishi wrote to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, accusing the BJP-led Central government of settling a “large number” of “illegal Rohingya migrants” in Delhi without consulting the state government.

Atishi claimed the issue has persisted for years and called on the BJP-led central government to provide the Delhi government with a complete list of Rohingyas and their addresses.

Additionally, she also demanded that no further rehabilitation of Rohingyas in Delhi should take place without consulting the Delhi government and its residents.

In a counter-allegation, Delhi Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President Virendra Sachdeva accused the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) of settling illegal Rohingya migrants in Delhi to secure their vote bank.

Speaking to ANI, Delhi BJP President Sachdeva said, “Rohingyas and Bangladeshis are taking away the rights of Delhi’s citizens. These illegal immigrants must be removed, and we have made repeated demands to this effect. Delhi belongs to its residents and the people of India. The AAP is settling foreigners in Delhi and must answer for this… Hardeep Puri ji has already clarified the matter. We have not allocated any housing to Bangladeshis or Rohingyas. AAP is doing so for their vote bank politics.”

Kerala: CPI(M) leader says ‘communal Muslim alliance’ behind Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi’s poll victory in Wayanad

On 21st December, Communist Party of India (Marxist) politburo leader A Vijayaraghavan said that the reason behind the poll victory of Congress leaders Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi from the Wayanad Lok Sabha seat was because of a “communal Muslim alliance.” Vijayaraghavan’s remarks came during the district conference of the Left party at Sultan Bathery.

Vijayaraghavan said, “Two persons have gone from Wayanad (Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi). With whose support? With the strong support of the communal Muslim alliance. Without their support, was it possible for Rahul Gandhi to reach Delhi? He is the Opposition leader. Who were in the front and back rows of the processions of Priyanka Gandhi? The worst extremist elements in the minorities were in them. They were with the Congress leadership. Without the support of the communal Muslim alliance, was it possible for Rahul Gandhi to reach Delhi?”

According to Vijayaraghavan, Suresh Gopi was able to win Lok Sabha seat and reach Delhi only because Congress did not handle the elections carefully. He accused the opposition alliance in Kerala of not taking the correct stand at the centre. He said, “Their main enemy is the Left. They do not mind even if Kerala is destroyed”.

Notably, during the Lok Sabha elections held in early 2024, CPI(M) strategised to lure Muslim voters in Kerala by highlighting issues that were popular among the community, including the Citizenship Amendment Act and the Gaza war. However, the party failed to gain the trust of Muslim voters and lost the Hindu voters for the CPI(M)-led LDF as well.

Vijayaraghavan’s attack on Congress, claiming the grand old party got support from Muslim organisations, is in fact in line with the strategy the party had adopted after the Lok Sabha elections in 2014. Following the realisation that CPI(M) lost its Hindu vote bank, the party has been trying to win back Hindu votes.

In the recently held by-elections for the Palakkad and Chelakkara assembly seats in Kerala, and the Wayanad Lok Sabha seat, CPI(M) was seen trying to approach Hindu voters. Interestingly, CPI(M) was also seen attacking Muslim political parties in the region. In a statement, Chief Minister of Kerala, Pinarayi Vijayan, called the state president of IUML, Sadiq Ali Shihab Thangal, an “activist of the Jamaat-e-Islami.”

He said Jamaat-e-Islami stood for an “Islamic regime” and added that the “extremist section” was trying to “gain influence in the Indian Union Muslim League.” IUML is part of the Congress-led United Democratic Front in Kerala. It is also a part of the I.N.D.I. Alliance at the national level.

Working along the lines of wooing Hindu voters, CM Vijayan also attempted to link Jamaat-e-Islami with the Congress Party just a month before the by-elections for the Wayanad Lok Sabha seat. He stated that now-MP Priyanka Gandhi was contesting the elections with the support of JeI, which, according to him, was not in favour of the democratic system.

Taliban-style treatment becoming common place in Bengal? Woman stripped and assaulted by Muslim mob, Suvendu Adhikari demands justice

On Saturday (21st December), West Bengal BJP MLA Suvendu Adhikari highlighted the case of a female Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader, who was attacked and stripped by a Muslim mob.

In a tweet, he said the incident occurred in Shyamsundarpur village in Purba Medinipur district of West Bengal. The area falls under the jurisdiction of the Nandakumar police station.

According to Suvendu Adhikari, a Muslim mob attacked the family of the victim and stripped her naked. They then proceeded to assault her and loot her belongings.

He informed that the police did not take action against the accused because they constituted the core vote bank of Mamata Banerjee’s party.

“Under Mamata Banerjee’s rule, they can do whatever they want by pointing their thumb at the law. The administration cannot do anything. It does not matter whether the victim is a Hindu leader of the Trinamool party. Because if the victim is a Hindu and the attacker is a Jihadi, it is clear as day which side the police administration will lean on,” he emphasised.

Suvendu Adhikari said that the BJP and Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) are providing the necessary assistance to the family of the victim. He also appealed to the Hindu supporters of the TMC and pointed out that only the BJP can protect them.

Taliban-style justice in West Bengal

In June this year, a woman was subjected to Taliban-style public flogging in West Bengal’s Uttar Dinajpur district by a TMC leader’s close aide.

A video of the incident was shared by CPI(M) leader Mohammed Salim, in which a local Bahubali leader Tajemul was seen assaulting a married woman and a man lying helplessly on the road in the name of ‘summary Justice’.

Sharing the video of the assault, CPI(M) leader and former Rajya Sabha MP Salim stated that the main accused seen in the video was a local TMC goon nicknamed ‘JCB’.

A similar case was reported from the Phulbari area of West Bengal’s Jalpaiguri district. A woman reportedly died by suicide after she was beaten up by a group of people from her village panchayat.

The woman’s husband said, “My wife ended her life by drinking some poisonous substance after some women from the village beat her up in front of the panchayat. I complained to the police that my wife died because of these women as she could not bear the humiliation of being summoned to the kangaroo court and being beaten up publicly.”

‘Attempt to start a civil war in India’: Petition filed in Bareilly over Rahul Gandhi’s caste census remark; Court issues notice to the Congress leader

0

The Bareilly District Court has issued a notice to Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi regarding his comments on the caste census during campaigning for parliamentary elections. The court issued a notice to Gandhi, directing him to appear on January 7.

The notice comes in response to a petition filed by Pankaj Pathak, who alleged that the remarks were like an “attempt to start a civil war in the country.”

“We felt that the statement given by Rahul Gandhi during the elections on caste census was like an attempt to start a civil war in the country”.

Initially, the petition was filed in the MP-MLA court, where it was dismissed. However, the petitioner pursued the matter by appealing to the District Judge Court. “Our appeal was accepted there, and a notice was issued to Rahul Gandhi,” Pathak said.

The petitioner emphasized that the statement by Gandhi had the potential to incite division and unrest within the country, necessitating judicial intervention.

Meanwhile, Rahul Gandhi continued to demand the resignation of Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Friday, claiming that there has been an “Akraman on Samvidhan” (Full attack on Constitution) and that that the Bharatiya Janata Party, PM Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah did a grave mistake insulting B R Ambedkar.

Posting about the remarks in his accounts on his social media accounts (Facebook and Instagram), Gandhi said, “BJP, Narendra Modi and Amit Shah have committed the biggest mistake of their lives by attacking the Constitution and insulting Baba Saheb. India will not forgive this mistake. The Home Minister should apologize and resign.”

He posted a montage of the multiple protests, marches and speeches Congress has taken out since the remarks of Amit Shah on Ambedkar.

Gandhi also highlighted a speech of his parliament, comparing it as a fight between Manusmriti and the Constitution, saying that one side defends the constitution

“It is written in the Constitution, prohibition of discrimination on grounds of race, caste, religion and place of birth…There is a battle taking place today in India. This side (pointing to his MPs) are the defenders of the idea of the Constitution,” he had said in his speech in Parliament. 

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Uttar Pradesh: Akeel poses as a Hindu to trap a divorced Hindu woman in Kanpur, rapes her, pressurises her for conversion

On 20th December, a divorced Hindu woman filed a complaint at Naubasta Police Station, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, accusing a man named Akeel of raping her and pressurising her to convert to Islam. She also accused him of attempting to extort Rs 5 lakh from her using obscene videos.

Initially, the police facilitated a compromise between the victim and Akeel. However, when the harassment did not stop, the woman approached the Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police (ADCP), who ordered an investigation into the matter.

Background of the case

According to media reports, the incident took place in the Dada Nagar area of Kanpur. The victim in this case is a divorced Hindu woman from Barra who works in a factory where the accused, Akeel, was employed as a contractor. When Akeel approached the victim, he claimed that he was single. However, it was later revealed that he was already married.

Furthermore, Akeel hid his true identity and posed as “Baua” to befriend the victim. He promised to marry her and coerced her into a physical relationship multiple times. The victim said in her complaint that she resisted a physical relationship with Akeel, but he did not pay heed to her.

Hindu organisations came in support of the Hindu woman. Image: abplive

The victim told the police that Akeel took her to several hotels and recorded obscene photos and videos of her. During that time, the victim became pregnant. When Akeel came to know about the pregnancy, he forced the victim to undergo an abortion. Eventually, the victim discovered his real identity, that he was a Muslim man, and also came to know that he was already married.

When the victim confronted him, Akeel started pressurising her to convert to Islam. The victim categorically refused to convert, after which Akeel resorted to blackmailing her using the explicit photos and videos. The victim alleged that Akeel attempted to extort Rs 5 lakh from her.

When she was left with no options, the victim approached Akeel’s wife. When she told his wife about her ordeal, instead of helping her, Akeel’s wife and his three brothers-in-law brutally assaulted the victim. Following the incident, the woman approached the police to file a complaint. However, no substantial action was taken by the police at that time. On 5th December, the police facilitated a compromise between the victim and Akeel’s family.

Following the compromise, Akeel did not stop pressurising the victim to give him Rs 5 lakh and convert to Islam. On 20th December, the victim finally decided to approach the ADCP and told him her ordeal. The ADCP took cognisance of the matter and directed the Naubasta police station to investigate the matter. Hindu organisations have come forward in support of the victim. They have expressed concerns over increasing instances of love jihad in Kanpur and demanded strict action against Akeel.