Home Blog Page 6490

Supreme Court upholds the Election Commission’s decision to ban the release of Modi biopic during elections

The Supreme Court has refused to lift the ban on the release of Vivek Oberoi’s biopic on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, upholding the ban imposed by the Election Commission (EC). As a result, the biopic PM Narendra Modi will not be released before May 19.


Refusing to interfere with the decision of the Election Commission, a Bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said that it was not inclined to entertain the application filed by the producers of the movie. The producers had argued that the order of the Election Commission banning the release of the biopic is contrary to the clearance given by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC).

The Election Commission had stalled the release of the movie saying that the movie was likely to tilt the balance in favour of a political party thereby disturbing the level playing field. The EC further termed the movie as eulogising a political representative and showing the opposition parties in a bad light. “This can be categorised as hagiography,” the EC had said in its response submitted before the SC. The film was watched by senior officers of the poll panel on April 17.

The Court had asked the EC to watch the movie and file a report citing the objections it has with it. The commission had filed the report yesterday after watching the movie, in which they had cited 17 dialogues as a reason for banning the movie during elections. The EC had told the Supreme Court that PM Narendra Modi is not only a biopic, but the movie has dialogues, symbols, and presentation that “eulogises a public representative”.

The movie was earlier set to release on April 11 but it was stayed from releasing by the Election Commission for the violation of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC). On April 9 the Supreme Court had given its approval for the release of the movie by refusing to stay its release, but the court had left it upon the Election Commission to see if the movie violates the Model Code of Conduct.

 

‘Anti-communist’ Javed Akhtar campaigns for proud communist and CPI candidate Kanhaiya Kumar

Noted lyricist and famed propagandist Javed Akhtar recently campaigned for self-avowed Communist and candidate for the CPI from Begusarai, Kanhaiya Kumar. During an election meeting at the constituency, Akhtar also took a dig at Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu for his communal speech.

Akhtar claimed that Kanhaiya was facing charges of sedition for standing up for truth. He remarked that if voters weren’t planning on voting for Kanhaiya, then they should say Assalum Aleikum (the Islamic form of greeting) to Giriraj Singh, the BJP candidate, and vote for him as that way, the BJP candidate will be grateful to them at least.

Akhtar campaigning for a Communist is a bit confusing as in the past, he has vociferously opposed the ideology. In the past, Akhtar has made comments along the lines of, “If Communism is your faith, then you are as bad as a religious person.” Considering the particularly harsh remarks he has made against Communists, his support for Kanhaiya appears even more incredulous.


For Kanhaiya, Communism certainly is his faith. According to the professional JNU protester, Communism is the “highest form of humanism”. In the two minute interviews linked below, Kanhaiya speaks of the ideology in very religious terms. He speaks a lot without really saying anything. In the end, he comes across as a phoney messiah who is selling his own favoured brand of God’s will.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuuH3GJIvPk]

Therefore, if Javed Akhtar was even remotely principled, he would have refrained from campaigning for Kanhaiya. While his earlier comments about communists and religious people being equally bad by virtue of their beliefs were too extreme and reek of the usual arrogance and intellectual bankruptcy of liberals, his campaigning for Kanhaiya only reveals the thorough lack of integrity and the utterly hypocritical standards of the celebrity class.

Javed Akhtar’s hypocrisy is quite well known. For all his secularism, Akhtar has maintained a tactical silence over the intolerance of Islamic radicals. On another occasion, while he had defended M.F. Hussain’s offensive portrayals of Hindu Gods as mere different expressions of existing traditions, he had condemned Salman Rushdie for allegedly writing derogatory content regarding Islam. Despite his apparent love for secularism, his attacks on religion always revolve around Hinduism. And now, it appears, despite his critique of Communism, perhaps he has never been averse towards the ideology after all.

PepsiCo sues potato farmers for growing the variety used for Lays Chips

The multinational company, Pepsico, has sued 9 potato farmers for growing and selling a potato variety used in the Lay’s chips. The case would be heard in a court in Ahmedabad on April 26.

As per reports, in the litigation filed by Pepsico, they claimed, “This was done to protect our rights and safeguard the larger interest of farmers that are engaged with us and who are using and benefitting from seeds of our registered variety.” The company is suing 9 farmers of Gujarat in the case.

Farmer activists, on the other hand, approached the agriculture and farmers welfare ministry on Thursday to publicly support the farmer’s rights under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights (PPV&FR) Act, 2001 and to immediately withdraw cases filed by PepsiCo India Holdings. They accused Pepsico of intimidating the farmers and infringing upon the rights of small farmers.

PepsiCo claims to have obtained the exclusive rights over a potato variety called FC-5.

In a letter sent to Ministry, the activists have said that the farmers have every right to produce and sell a protected variety of seeds and that Pepsico can’t claim intellectual property right on it. The letter also sought funds from the government.

“Provide from the National Gene Fund the costs of legal suits that the farmers are having to face, until the time that the cases are withdrawn by PepsiCo. Issue a notification that no company can trespass into a farmer’s field without due intimation of the local district agriculture office and the farmer’s prior informed consent,” it said.

Farmers cite the Section 39 of the PPV&FR Act, 2001 which reportedly says that a farmer is allowed “To save, use, sow, resow, exchange, share or sell his farm produce including seed of a variety protected under the Act” so long as he does not sell “branded seed”. On the other hand, Pepsico claims that its rights were being infringed upon by citing Section 64 of the same Act.

The President of Gujarat Khedut Samaj, Jayesh Patel said that in the previous year, Pepsico had a contract-farming agreement for producing a particular potato variety. The farmers had used the potatoes that were rejected by the company, as substandard produce, as seeds to grow their own produce this year. The company is suing them for this and seeks royalty from them.

Badribhai Joshi of the Gujarat Khedut Samaj said “These are among the first cases of alleged IPR infringement against farmers in India in a post-WTO world. Wrongly decided, these could set a wrong precedent impacting farmers’ livelihoods quite adversely”.

Why I think Prime Minister Modi will win 2019 and why some people won’t believe in it

As the Elections 2019 draw to an end, the desperation rises among the intellectual gang which has even till yesterday considered Narendra Modi in the government as an aberration. Those who were amused, surprised and often aghast at common individuals coming forward, investing their time and money to promote Narendra Modi as a national cause, are now downright dejected. They tried confusing the electorate by creating fake demons out of windmills. The insecurities of all kinds were played out, from minority under danger to judiciary under danger to democracy under danger, nothing was left out. Nothing seems to have succeeded.

Rahul Gandhi did not give them much to play around with. Priyanka Vadra who was launched as Brahmastra too has now, it seems left them in the lurch. What comes out of the refusal of Priyanka Vadra to fight against Modi from Varanasi is nothing but an evidence of the fact that for the first family of Congress,  the grand, old party itself has become nothing but the handmaiden to the first family. The party, if the murmurs are to be believed, has been telling Rahul Gandhi to stop his chants of Rafale, since no one believes in his charges. The entitled prince, who when not even in the cabinet tore off an ordinance approved by the cabinet, refused to listen, so charmed is he with his own rhetoric, even after the courts and CAG, both judicial and constitutional bodies, gave clean chit to Modi on the cooked up corruption charges. Rahul Gandhi seemingly has been emboldened by the historic blunder of trumped-up Kargil Coffin-gate scam, which ended the political career of George Fernandes, before the case was thrown out of Supreme Court. He does not understand that India has moved since. He has become a typical habitual liar who cannot be trusted even when telling his name. I meant it as a saying but then he is Rahul Gandhi or Raul Vinci? Rahul Gandhi and his brazen, stubborn and tiresome jibe of Chowkidar Chor hai is best explained by Jonathan Swift in his essay The Art of Political Lying when he writes,

“A political lie is sometimes born out of a discarded statesman’s head and thence delivered to be nursed and dandled by the mob.”

But then, I think, no such deliberations might have gone into it. Maybe he is not driven to the lies by his political necessities. Maybe he simply is enjoying being a thorough liar and the power that allows him to go around unquestioned about his lies. The man has no scruples and an immense satisfaction is quite evident on his face when he utters something stupid and vile. He seems to simply enjoy being ill-mouthed and untruthful. He seems to have developed a taste for perjury, almost to the point of addiction.  There is contempt case now against him in the highest court of the country as he tried to make the Supreme Court a party to his abuses and untruths. He walks out with a half-hearted apology and then repeats his lies again.

The problem with Rahul Gandhi is that he is not a sincere man. The left-liberal cabal which maintained a stranglehold over the independent thought in this nation over the last Seven decade, living at the crumbs the royals threw at the courtiers, is fast losing hope. They tried to make Nationalism, development, religious freedom and culture as mutually exclusive choices. They need not be and citizens were quick to note that. Indian people understood that Growth and Nationalist are not Either-Or choices. With Modi, they can have both. Modi’s 2014 election was a test of hope, an optimistic audacity, almost a flight of fancy. The campaign of 2014 was marked with a sense of euphoria, with foamy effervescence. There was a request from the party, towards the people, a nudge, a push, to elect Modi.

The 2019 campaign is much more well-settled on the ground, solid and subtle. In 2014, it was the party, the nationalist BJP wanted people to vote for them. In 2019, it is the people who want to vote for Narendra Modi, because they do not want to vote for Chrisislamist Congress supportive of Balkanization of India. (I did not want to write in such absolute terms but I am getting tired of people like Sushil Aaron who write with impunity and blatant disregard of intellectual integrity on global platforms like New York Times calling BJP as Hindu Nationalist party, in a hope to polarize Indian elections on communal lines, to favour Rahul Gandhi.

They are the people who are confused by the fact that even when they believe themselves to have led the common masses to an abyss of death and doom with fake stories of intolerance and hatred, the unwashed masses simply refuse to jump into the dark depth of family slavery. They are amused because they keep on feeding stories of re-emergence of Rahul Gandhi for the umpteenth time and no one any longer believes in them. They know the truth, but they believe that the undecided voters might still go with those they believe to be winning party, irrespective of the merit. In the process, they either convince themselves that Narendra Modi will lose and once again they will be deciding the intellectual direction for the nation, which the common people will follow like an obedient, unthinking herd of sheep.

They have been trying to convince people of lies so hard and for such a long time, that they have themselves begun believing in it. So they are again making foolish political predictions. And these poor political pundits remind me of that old essay of George Orwell on political predictions. George Orwell wrote on Political Predictions long time back something which rings true even today for Indian intellectuals predicting the political outcome of the elections favouring Rahul Gandhi, declaring a definite rout of Narendra Modi. Orwell writes:

“..Political thinking for years past has been vitiated in the same way. People can foresee the future only when it coincides with their own wishes, and the most grossly obvious facts can be ignored when they are unwelcome….One could point to countless other instances of people hugging quite manifest delusions because the truth would be wounding their pride.”

This is almost reflective of the Indian intellectual scene. Those who claim to hold the charge of intellectual priesthood merely on account of their closeness to Nehru-Gandhi family fail to notice the apathy with which Rahul Gandhi goes absconding from Amethi after letting the constituency fall to abject ruin as the lowest income district in the state, on account of stupid and stubborn neglect as elected parliamentarian from the constituency. They ignore the fact that both the members of the first family sitting in the parliament riding on almost slavish faith of the people of Rai Bareli and Amethi are among the worst-performing parliamentarian on the basis of independent assessment. They will ignore the development Narendra Modi has provided to Gujarat earlier as the Chief Minister and to Varanasi now as an MP in the last five years.

They will ignore that people in 2014 voted for Modi because Modi wanted them to Vote him into power. On the contrary, in the current elections, people will vote for Modi because they want to vote for Modi. Modi is no longer a factor behind the now almost-certain Modi win in 2019 election. BJP wanting Narendra Modi to win and Narendra Modi wanting to return to power is no longer of any consequence. People will vote him into power even if he goes for vacations for the rest of the polling phases. It is the people of India who want Modi to be back in the power, rejecting the dynastic despot. After decades of silence, they have found their voice and are finally speaking. The democracy of India is now coming of age. It knows what it wants and does not need demagogues to make choices for them. The invested intellectuals of compromised integrity will ignore this truth because the acknowledgement of this truth is also an acknowledgement of their own irrelevance. They will ignore this truth because it wounds their pride. This is the truth which will explain the victory of Narendra Modi. He will win not because he wants to win. Narendra Modi will win because the people of India want him to win.

Congress manages to insult the memory of Pulwama martyrs and make fun of Nehru in one stroke

On a day when an artist received a complaint about a satire morphed image, the official Twitter handle of the Congress party posted a shocking morphed image on Twitter. And by doing so, the Congress party managed to mock the victims of Pulwama terror attacks and India’s first prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru with a single digitally edited image.


The Congress party used a photograph of a meeting of National Security Council Meet chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and morphed a photograph of Jawaharlal Nehru to look like as if he is peeking through the door while laughing with a funny face. They used this caption with the image, “that awkward moment when you’re all thinking the same thing & someone says it out loud.”

In the photograph, The ministers belonging to the Cabinet Committee of security and NSA Ajit Doval are seeing having a deep thought, and the Congress party implied that everyone is thinking that Modi government will lose the ongoing parliament elections.

The meeting seen in the photograph took place on 3rd March this year, days after the high military tension between India and Pakistan following the horrific terror attack in Pulwama. The PM, senior ministers and the NSA were discussing a very serious matter when the country was at the brink of a full-blown war with nuclear powered Pakistan, but the Congress party thinks it is a matter of fun. By posting the image, the Congress party has insulted the memories of victims of Pulwama terror attack.

Although Congress wanted to mock BJP, they also ended up mocking their own Jawaharlal Nehru by photoshopping him in the manner that they did. In the edited image, it looks like while the members of the current govt are serious about the matter of governance, Nehru’s image gives a completely opposite impression about him.

More importantly, Congress used Nehru’s image from a photo which many people use to suggest that the former PM was flirting with Edwina Mountbatten, the wife of the last viceroy of British India, while rest of the India was busy fighting for Independence.

That image is often used to mock Jawaharlal Nehru, and Congress party chose to use the digitally colourised version of the same image thinking they are mocking Narendra Modi.

In one swift motion, with one edited picture, Congress not only insulted the martyrs of the dastardly Pulwama terror attack but also mocked former PM Jawaharlal Nehru. To take an image where the country’s government was contemplating how the terror attack mounted by Pakistan must be avenged and how the country must be kept safe from Pakistan sponsored terrorists, is nothing short of irresponsible and insensitive coming from the oldest political party of the country. It only signifies that Congress won’t shy away from using solemn, serious occasions of national importance for their own petty political aims.

The Prime Minister’s roadshow at Varanasi was a reflection of the liberals’ worst nightmare

On the 25th of April, 2019, the Bharatiya Janata Party organized a roadshow in Varanasi where Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the centre of attention. Varanasi, the city older than time itself, overflowed with a sea of saffron as people thronged to the streets to welcome the Prime Minister in his constituency.

PM Modi roadshow in Varanasi ahead of filing nomination

The entire event emphasized strongly on Narendra Modi’s Hindu identity. After paying tributes to Pandit Madan Mohan Malviya during the roadshow, the Prime Minister performed the Ganga Aarti with his trusted lieutenant Amit Shah. The Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Yogi Adityanath, was also present at the scene dressed in his traditional Saffron attire.

The Hindu imagery that dominated the roadshow and the events that followed was only to be expected as the venue for it was one of the most sacred cities for Hindus. However, it appears the symbolism of it all did not go down too well with liberals and secularists.


It’s understandable why liberals reacted so strongly against the roadshow at Varanasi. Narendra Modi is a refutation of the brand of politics they have attempted to create through the establishment. He embraces his Hindu identity, is rooted in Indian traditions and is proud of its rich culture and heritage. He does not put much emphasis on his caste either. It puts him at odds with the entirety of the political establishment.

Liberals wouldn’t have been bothered too much had the flags at Varanasi been green instead of saffron. At Rahul Gandhi’s rally at Wayanad ahead of filing his nomination, his parade was littered with the green flags of the Muslim League with their Islamic crescents. Secularism isn’t hurt when the President of the main opposition party allies himself with minority parties that even Communists deem too radical. Secularism is not hurt when the Islamic crescent is seen at Rahul Gandhi’s roadshow. However, Narendra Modi performing Ganga Aarti is the real threat to secularism according to the intellectual brigade.

Source: National Herald

In a great many ways, Narendra Modi has decisively shifted the Overton Window of Indian politics towards Hindutva. And he has done so in a way that the Late Atal Bihari Vajpayee couldn’t during his tenure as Prime Minister. Under Narendra Modi, the worst of liberals’ nightmares have come true. At this moment, Hindutva is no longer the counter-ideology of Indian politics, it is mainstream now. And to the great dismay of secularists and liberals, their ideology is now lying neglected in the dustbin of electoral politics.

India will no longer be held hostage to minority appeasement under the garb of secularism. Hindus will no longer be shamed into abandoning their traditions and their culture. Hindus will defend the ancient ways of their ancestors and protect the heritage for the generations to come. As much a consequence of the Hindu revival that Narendra Modi’s rise in national politics is, he has also contributed significantly towards cementing it and translating it into concrete benefits.

Liberals are especially scared because they realize they have lost their monopoly over the narrative as well as the ability to force people into buying what they are selling. Despite their screeching, a Warrior Priest of the Nath Sampradaya cloaked in Saffron was appointed the Chief Minister of the country’s most populous state. Despite all their whining, a victim of the Secular state who was tortured and framed for terrorism because the establishment wished to invent Hindu Terror will contest the elections against someone who was at the forefront of the Hindu Terror narrative. All of this could not have happened without the Modi-Shah juggernaut establishing its stranglehold in Indian politics.

BJP President Amit Shah has reiterated on several occasions that the 2019 Lok Sabha Elections could be deemed to be the Fourth Battle of Panipat. Perhaps, when he made the proclamation, even he couldn’t have guessed how appropriate an analogy it would be. The Congress President’s candidature from a constituency where Hindus are in the minority perfectly encapsulates the significance of the ongoing Lok Sabha Elections.

That Rahul Gandhi is contesting from Wayanad as a safe seat and Narendra Modi is contesting from Varanasi represents the great difference in vision that the Congress party and the BJP have for the country. In Varanasi lies the heart of Hinduism. In Wayanad, Dharma is at its lowest ebb.

At this juncture, the battle is clearly not limited to Narendra Modi versus Rahul Gandhi alone or the BJP versus the rest. It’s also a battle between Saffron and the brand of secularism that cloaks itself under a garb of green. It’s also a battle between Varanasi, the oldest city in history, and what it represents and the Secularism that is most comfortable when flags with Islamic crescents fly high. In 2019, it is the battle between Nehruvian Secularism and Hindutva. And as of now, Hindutva appears to have the definitive edge.

Fugitive Nirav Modi’s bail rejected for the third time, next hearing set on May 30

A court in the UK has rejected the bail application of fugitive Indian diamond tycoon Nirav Modi for the third time. As per the latest reports, the judge, in. a brief hearing remanded Nirav Modi in custody till May 24.

The judge has scheduled a next full-hearing for Nirav Modi on May 30.

Fugitive businessman Nirav Modi, who is undergoing extradition procedure after UK government had found his case fit for extradition, had appeared before the London court for a remand hearing on Friday.

The fraudster, who has been behind bars at Wandsworth prison in south-west London since his arrest last month, is set to be produced before a judge at Westminster Magistrates’ Court via video link from the jail.

The hearing this week takes place as per the four-week time frame for judicial remand in such cases.

The hearing was scheduled after Nirav Modi failed his second attempt to seek bail after his arrest on March 20, 17 months after he fled India, by Scotland Yard officers from a central London bank branch, while he had been trying to open a new bank account and since then has been in custody at the HMP Wandsworth prison in south-west London. The first bail plea was rejected by District Judge Marie Mallon soon after his arrest.

Amusingly his desperation had forced his defence team to use his pet dog in their pursuit to get Nirav Modi out of jail but failed in their attempt.

The fugitive diamantaire’s “lack of community ties” in the UK and his attempt to acquire Vanuatu’s citizenship in late 2017 went against him as the judge said it seemed like he was trying to “move away from India at an important time”.

Meanwhile, Toby Cadman, representing crown prosecution on behalf of Indian authorities, had argued that there was a “substantial risk” that the prime accused in the PNB fraud case would flee and attempt to interfere with witnesses and evidence.

After hearing the arguments of both the defence and prosecution teams, Judge Arbuthnot accepted the Indian government’s arguments, noting the “very unusual” evidence she had seen at this early stage in the case of interference with witnesses and destroying evidence in the form of mobile phones and a server and rejected the bail application.

Meanwhile, the hearing on Friday is expected to be procedural unless some new factors are placed before the court to consider. Modi can make a third bail application at Westminster Magistrates’ Court but only if the grounds for the bail plea are substantially different.

Nirav Modi, his wife Ami Modi, brother Nishal Modi, and uncle Mehul Choksi are accused defrauding Punjab National Bank to the tune of Rs 14,356 crore by obtaining Letter of Undertaking without furnishing any guarantee.

Watch: Propagandist Nikhil Wagle calls Hafiz Saeed ‘Hamara Apna’ in a rant video against PM Modi

The propagandist and self-proclaimed journalist Nikhil Wagle, in a video that featured his frustrated rant against PM Modi for 15 minutes has gone a step ahead form Congress leaders and even the Pakistan government in his endearment of dreaded terrorist Hafiz Saeed.

While Pakistan’s government, despite letting Hafiz Saeed run his business and terror camps on their soil, never admits internationally that they support him, Nikhil Wagle has gone ahead and claimed kinship to the LeT boss by saying he is “Hamara Apna Hafiz Saeed”.

In a 15-minute video shared on YouTube by News Click, where Wagle goes on a full-fledged rant against PM Modi, claiming that BJP is losing and Modi-Shah are failing, he proclaims that Hafiz Saeed is “Hamara Apna” (our own). Wagle’s love for Saeed can be seen in the video here from 7.40 minutes onwards.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eB53R3ZIqNc?start=460]

In the video, Wagle seems to be sure that after 3-rounds of elections in the country, the BJP appears to be losing. He begins with an innovation, like most liberals bringing imaginary taxi drivers, maids, husbands and children of the maids and other such persons to propagate their political ‘predictions’, Wagle brings a ‘BJP leader’ he met recently, who, as per Wagle, has confirmed his predictions that the BJP is losing the elections badly.

The BJP leader who shall not be named, as Wagle says if his name is Publicised, Modi-Shah will throw him out of the party, has apparently stated to Wagle that BJP has fielded Sadhvi Pragya because the Pulwama-Balakot incidents did not seem to work politically for the party. We wonder whether the ‘BJP leader who shall not be named’ was someone like Shatrughan Sinha, because he has been echoing Wagle’s sentiments for a very long time, without being kicked out by Modi-Shah, before finally joining Congress.


Wagle then rants about the media giving coverage to Sadhvi Pragya. He says that the media should not have done that. He claims that Sadhvi Pragya is a terrorist and terrorists of Hindutva should not get any media coverage. Wagle however, neglects to mention that Sadhvi Pragya was imprisoned illegally for 8 years without a charge sheet and the NIA has already stated that there is not enough evidence against her to link her to the Malegaon blasts.

Wagle also claims that in his 5-year rule, PM Modi has not spoken to media. By ‘speaking to media’, Wagle further clarifies, he means speaking to ‘journalists’ like Raveesh Kumar and Abhisar Sharma. He seems to think that the dozen or so interviews of the PM mean nothing unless the person asking questions is Raveesh ‘Koun Jaat Ho’ Kumar or Abhisar ‘headlights’ Sharma.

He also complains about PM Modi’s recent non-political interview by Akshay Kumar. He also complains that the interview was not about elections and instead PM Modi was asked questions about his life, memories, and habits instead of election-related issues, again missing the obvious fact that the interview was non-political and food habits, life, memories, and experiences are the very topics that are covered in a non-political discussion.

Wagle’s frustration is understandable. In 2017, he had tried to claim that his TV show for a Marathi news channel was stopped because of political pressure, only to be called out by a fellow journalist who had revealed that it was not political pressure but dismal TRPs that had resulted in his show’s cancellation. He has also been called out in the past for trying to spread fake news.

“If BJP comes back to power, only Rahul Gandhi will be responsible”: Arvind Kejriwal shows frustration of failed alliance talks

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal tore into Rahul Gandhi today for failing to form an alliance in the state, even after repeated efforts of the Aam Aadmi Party.

At the launch of his party’s manifesto, Arvind Kejriwal vented his frustration by slamming the Congress President saying “I can say that we tried our best to form an alliance with Congress and if the BJP comes back to power, only one person would be responsible for it and that would be Rahul Gandhi,” he said.

Kejriwal further added that he took the decision of forming an alliance with the Congress to ‘save the country’, otherwise AAP would not have ‘dreamt’ of an alliance.

Kejriwal stormed at Rahul Gandhi asking him which alliance is formed on Twitter.

“I want to ask Rahul Gandhi which alliance is formed on Twitter. If they were serious about forming an alliance they should have come to the table for negotiations. Giving statements in public is not going to solve the problem,” he said.

Rahul had taken to Twitter to talk about the seat-sharing proposal with the AAP.


To this Kejriwal said, giving three seats to Congress would mean losing all those seats.

“Congress cannot win in Delhi. If Congress was in a position to win Delhi then I was ready to leave all seven seats for Congress but an alliance of 4:3 with Congress would be with like forming an alliance with BJP.

“My conscience does not allow me to give three seats to BJP,” Kejriwal said.

He claimed that it was the Congress which backtracked every time. The AAP supremo claimed that AAP agreed every time the Congress came up with a proposal but at the last moment, Congress backtracked and said there could be no alliance anywhere except Delhi.

“They used to come out with some conditions on seat sharing, we used to agree to conditions then they would backtrack”, said Kejriwal.

“(Senior AAP leader) Sanjay Singh was called last Tuesday by Ghulam Nabi Azad and they agreed on alliance on 18 seats but the next morning we kept waiting, kept calling and in the evening the Congress again changed their conditions in Haryana, Chandigarh and Delhi,” he said, claiming  his party again agreed to a seat-sharing arrangement proposed by them but then the next day they again said that the alliance can be done only in Delhi.

“They put out conditions which were very difficult for me,” he said, furthering that the seven seats of Delhi this time would make a difference in the formation of the government.

Kejriwal, seeming quite miffed by Rahul’s proposal further trained his guns at the Congress party saying that Congress is not getting a single Hindu vote while the Muslims are also slightly confused.

“Congress is trying to weaken the opposition in different states – whether it is Kerala, Haryana, Goa West Bengal or UP, but I hope people from all religions who want to save the country would unite and vote for the AAP,” he said.

Kejriwal’s desperation to form an alliance with the Congress has left him completely flustered. Kejriwal, who was not being able to digest a no for an answer moved beyond expressing his affection and appealing to the Congress and started pestering Congress, begging it to agree to form an alliance.

Probably this rejection forced Kejriwal to move into the oblivion for all this while. He made an appearance after a relatively long time at the launch of his party’s manifesto for the ongoing Lok Sabha elections which vowed to stop Modi-Shah duo at the centre.

How a born communist Atishi Marlena, who is today being hailed as a ‘revolutionary’, ruined Delhi’s education system

The ability of the left-Lutyens industry to create new ‘mediocre’ heroes to necessitate some sort of revolution against a stable-peaceful political system is quite astonishing. First, it was Arvind Kejriwal, then came Kanhaiya Kumar, Shehla Rasheed, Gurmehar Kaur and others, who often marinate in their own mediocrity, attempting to instil anarchy.

With these devious ideas and individuals passing into oblivion, the left-liberals amaze us now with propping up Atishi Marlena as some sort of youth icon who revolutionised Delhi’s education. But, as usual, the left propaganda always turns out to be another myth.

Atishi ‘Marx-Lenin’ Marlena, the Aam Aadmi Party candidate from East Delhi Lok Sabha constituency, is being hailed as a revolutionary by the Lutyens cabal for her alleged contribution to uplift the Delhi’s education sector. The credentials of Marlena are as weird as her last name. The AAP propaganda cell is somewhat successful in building a ‘too good to be true’ image for Atishi Marlena by deliberately hiding the disasters that contributed to further deterioration of Delhi’s education system.

According to a Twitter user named Ananya, Atishi Singh was born to Delhi University professors Vijay Kumar Singh and Tripta Wahi. She was reportedly named after her parents’ ideological gurus Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin. Atishi ‘Marlena’ has truly inherited the communist ideology and a born communist.

A huge controversy surrounding Athishi Marlena has now erupted after she resorted to religious appeasement by dropping her last name ‘Marlena’ as she sounded ‘Christian’, which may not be suitable in her campaign during Lok Sabha elections.

Interestingly, Marlena’s parents Vijay Kumar Singh and Tripta Wahi are devout communists. Atishi’s parents belong to the group of ’eminent’ personalities who had cryingly written a mercy petition to the President of India against the death penalty for Jaish-e-Mohammad terrorist Afzal Guru.

Interestingly, Tripta Wahi is also closely linked to SAR Geelani, one of the notorious face of anti-India and terrorist sympathiser. Her father Prof. Vijay Singh, Editor of a ‘Communist propaganda’ website, Revolutionary Democracy, is part of ‘Stalin society’, which has the sole mission of defending the revolutionary legacy of the former Soviet dictator Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, who is responsible for around 20 million deaths in his lifetime. On the other hand, Atishi Marlena has been suspiciously tight-lipped about the involvement of her family in anti-India movements and also regarding her communist credentials.

Atishi Marlena is also hailed for her so-called ‘exemplary’ accomplishments in the education sector in Delhi. Atishi Marlena is yet another manifestation of left-liberal cabal propaganda of glorifying mediocrity under the garb of intellect.

We looked into the claims of Atishi Marlena regarding her ‘exemplary’ service to Delhi’s education. Atishi Marlena who started as a spokesperson for AAP was later made ‘advisor’ to Education Minister Manish Sisodia. Marlena was later kicked out of the ‘illegal’ post as they were not sanctioned by the Finance Ministry.

The Delhi AAP government had done all the pomp and show along with relentless propaganda to claim that they ‘revolutionised’ public education system in Delhi. However, despite the crores of rupees spent on advertising their so-called achievements, nothing has actually transpired on the ground.

According to Dr Nandini Sharma, an elected member and Chairman of the Education Committee of the South Delhi Municipal Corporation, despite all the noise about modernising public school, the AAP government under Manish Sisodia and his advisor Atishi Marlena have not only wasted an opportunity to transform the public education system in the Delhi but also they both further deteriorated the already deteriorated education system in the national capital. 

An Indian Express report states that Rs.250 crores had gone down the drain as the Aam Aadmi Party’s ‘Model Schools’ project had severe irregularities. The AAP had sought to convert 54 government schools into model schools and had handed the job of beatification of these schools to Delhi Tourism and Transport Development Corporation (DTTDC). However, merely 3 years later, the walls have developed cracks in some of the recently completed schools.

The AAP with its propaganda arm has managed to make a hero out of Atishi ‘Marlena’ Singh despite the fact that under her watch, Delhi education infrastructure has gone worse from the bad. The photographs of so-called ‘model’ schools have been spread far and wide across media highlighting them as the champions of AAP’s transformative policies but facts point to the contrary. According to reports, the walls of recently completed schools have begun to display cracks.

Atishi Marlena’s biggest disaster during her time as an advisor to the Delhi government was their incompetency to address the non-availability of teachers that too in an urban conglomeration like Delhi. Generally, the trend is that the teachers are unwilling to work in rural areas compared to urban areas. The preference for urban posting ideally should mean that Delhi should have an excess of teachers but in reality, public schools in Delhi are faced by a severe teacher shortage.

Addition to this, the AAP government did not even address the persistent problem of ‘textbooks’ shortage. In the 2016-17 academic year, children in Delhi’s government schools received their textbooks in phases, over months some reaching them six to nine months into the session, according to Dr Nandini Sharma.

During the tenure of Atishi Marlena as an advisor to Delhi’s Education Minister, the relationship between the private schools and the government had turned extremely hostile. The AAP government was waging a legal battle against private unaided school accusing them of indulging in malpractices and corruption. Interestingly, the Delhi High Court had slammed the state government for not maintaining the same standards that they expect from the private schools.

In fact, the Delhi government aggressively used the Right to Education (RTE) act to stifle the autonomy of private schools. Further, the Delhi government in its desperation to appease parents had tried to depict all private schools as extortionists.

Despite tall claims of bettering private schools, the government school children have severely fallen behind. The AAP Government has been propagating misleading information to claim higher passing percentages of Class 12 to project that they have done some substantial reforms. But in reality, the passing percentage for government schools in Delhi have been quite similar to those of private schools.

The claims that this is the first time Delhi government schools have outdone private school are not completely true. Reportedly, the government schools in Delhi had fared slightly better in 2012, 2013 and 2014 long before Aam Aadmi Party came into existence. In 2009 and 2010 too, under Sheila Dikshit government, government schools had done better than private schools.

Reportedly, a large number of government schools in Delhi does not offer critical subjects like Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, and Biology, which are taught in private schools. These critical subjects will eventually bring down the passing percentages rates of private schools as they are considered relatively difficult. Without teaching core Science and Mathematics, the AAP run government schools cannot claim to be achieving something revolutionary.

Despite all the marketing, the fact remains that the public education system worsened under Manish Sisodia and Atishi Marlena. With highly abusive propaganda machinery behind Aitshi Marlena, it is not surprising that she has been able to pull off such con to make people believe that they have indeed transformed education in Delhi. However, facts prove otherwise.