Home Blog Page 6861

Union minister Giriraj Singh calls Darul Uloom Deoband “temple of terrorism”

Union Minister and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Giriraj Singh stirred a controversy on Wednesday when he reportedly called the leading Islamic seminary Darul Uloom Deoband a ”temple of terrorism”.


”Earlier, Deoband’s name was Deovrant. I do not know what it is about this place that it produces people similar to Baghdadi (Islamic State founder) and Hafiz Saeed (Mumbai terror nattack mastermind and JuD chief). This place is not a seat of learning. It is a hub of terrorism,” he said.

Singh made the remarks during his visit to Devikund to meet Seer Swami Brhmananand Saraswati at his ashram. He also visited a gurukul (Vedic school) in the town and said that the children, who received education at such institutions, never thought of violence and served the humanity after graduating from those great institutions.

Singh said that no student from the Gurukul in Deoband has ever become a terrorist but it is difficult to state whether Darul Uloom is an institution of education or terrorism. He claimed that terrorists like Hafiz Saeed and Baghdadi both are alumni of Darul Uloom.

He asked whether the Islamic school offers education about the betterment of human race or about the devastation of the race, because both its alumni Baghdadi and Saeed are killing humans.

The Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) Minister also appealed to the Muslims not to create obstacles in the construction of Ram temple. “I want to make an appeal to Muslims that these 100 crore Hindus are also their brothers. You erected three lakh mosques here and no one stopped you. But now don’t test Hindus’ patience. Lord Ram is my faith and his temple will be made in Ayodhya,” he added.

Singh’s remarks have drawn flak from the Muslim clerics. Deobandi Ulema Qari Sayyid Ishaq Gora condemned his statement and demanded an immediate apology. “The statement by Giriraj Singh is baseless and unfortunate. He should take back his comment and apologise not only to a particular community but to the whole nation. The way he has given the baseless statement shows his wrong thinking. If he believes that Madarsas are the hub of terrorism, then, I would like to suggest him to take admission to a Madrasa to see what kind of teaching the students get in this institution. We teach students love and respect for our nation,” Gora told ANI. Another cleric, Mufti Asad Kasami, challenged Singh to prove that Baghdadi and Hafiz Saeed used to be students of Darul Uloom Deoband.

Free Balochistan Movement leader Hyrbyair Marri to attend event in India

0

Hyrbyair Marri, the leader of Free Balochistan Movement (FBM), will be traveling to India to attend a conference in New Delhi. He has been invited by BJP leader and president of Delhi Study Group president Vijay Jolly to attend a seminar on ‘Human Rights in Balochistan’, and Marri has accepted the invitation. This was announced by FBN in a press release issued by the organisation.

The seminar is scheduled to take place on 10th December, which is the International Human Rights Day. In the seminar, Mari will “inform the Indian people and media about the ongoing gross human rights violations in Balochistan”.


The organisation has announced a host of events they plan to organise on the Human Rights Day. They are going to organise a number of protests and awareness campaigns in different countries around the world on that day. The aim of the protests and campaigns is to expose Pakistani and Iranian state atrocities against the Baloch people, said the statement.

Free Balochistan Movement is a political entity with an aim to liberate the Balochistan region from the controls of Pakistan and Iran. It aims to establish an independent Balochistan with a parliamentary democracy and a secular constitution.

Pakistan accuses that Hyrbyair Marri is the leader of the Balochistan Liberation Army, which is designated as a terrorist organisation. He is currently living in the UK after he was granted political asylum in 2011.

In 2015, Marri’s representative Balaach Pardili had addressed a gathering in New Delhi, and he had read a statement by Marri, which had drawn outrage from Pakistan. Pakistan had said that it is proof that India is supporting the Baloch movement in Pakistan. Reacting to this, spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs had said that “India has always been home to the persecuted people from all over the world.”

Update: This report has been updated with relevant information

Corridor of Love: Indian journalists are elated with the experience they had in Pakistan

Gurudwara Kartarpur Sahib Gurudwara corridor has evoked mixed reactions. While Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu accepted Imran Khan’s invite and had praised Imran Khan profusely, Minister Sushma Swaraj couldn’t go and Punjab Chief Minister Captain Amarinder Singh had declined the invitation.

Amidst all this, the Indian journalists who were invited to Pakistan were visibly quite happy as they couldn’t stop singing praises about the hospitality they received in the otherwise not-so-friendly neighbour while doubling up as messengers of peace themselves. We had earlier reported the list of “approved” journalists who travelled to Pakistan after being vetted by the Pakistan High Commission. It was interesting to note that several media organisations like Republic, Times Now or even ANI did not make it to the list.

Sardesai was delighted to meet his ‘old friends’ and expressed sadness that Indian media houses spread more hate towards Pakistan than Pakistan does that for India.

Also why Rajdeep Sardesai’s ‘popularity “transcends borders”, an observation made by Arfa Khanum Sherwani, a journalist with The Wire, headed by US passport holder Siddharth Varadarajan who is also in the Pakistan High Commission “approved” list of journalists travelling to Pakistan to cover the inauguration.

India has maintained that it will not participate in SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation) summit, which is scheduled to be held in Islamabad this year until Pakistan ends terror. However, Pakistan believes that India may turn down the invite because of upcoming elections.

We are not sure whether NDTV’s political editor, Sunetra, clarified India’s stand to Pakistan Minister. She was, however, quite thrilled at visiting Pakistan.

View this post on Instagram

Hello Pakistan

A post shared by Sunetra Choudhury (@mssunetra) on

The Wire journalist, too, cited Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Pakistan’s Foreign Minister that the engagement with India (at SAARC) may be delayed due to elections, which he understands are important.

Again, we are not sure whether Mitra and her colleagues pointed out the fact that India had declined to attend the SAARC summit in November 2016 as well and has suspended bilateral dialogues with Pakistan after the Uri attacks. That earlier this year, MEA Sushma Swaraj had walked out early of an informal meeting of SAARC nations at the sidelines of the UN general assembly. Swaraj had stated in her short statement that the ecosystem of terrorism can only be dismantled with solid action on the ground.

And then there were the ones spreading the message of peace.

Several questions are now being raised about the list of “approved” journalists and the zeal with which they have been participating in peddling the ‘aman ki asha’ line of argument while in Pakistan. How were these journalists “selected”? Was there a provision to apply? If there was, why were journalists from several other agencies like Republic, Times Now, Zee News or even ANI not on the list? Was there some selectivity on Pakistan’s side while selecting journalists? Did the ones who are more likely to be sympathetic towards Pakistan’s line of argument chosen?

These are questions which have not been answered yet. However, while Pakistan regularly sends gun-wielding terrorists to India with the sole aim of bleeding India with a thousand cuts, the jubilation displayed by these journalists do make citizens uncomfortable.

Niti Aayog Vice Chairman calls out P Chidambaram’s lies and disingenuous tricks on GDP numbers

Former Finance Minister of India, P Chidambaram, is mighty disgruntled with the revised GDP numbers released by the Niti Aayog for the UPA era. He has called it a “bad joke”.


Chidambaram also insinuated that the Niti Aayog Vice Chairman, Rajiv Kumar, was not open to debate the data and had told journalists that their questions were “undeserving of an answer”.


Rajiv Kumar did not take Chidambaram’s critique lightly and asserted that he accepts the Congress leader’s challenge for a debate to discuss the back series data. He also asserted that it was “disingenuous” of Chidambaram to say that he told the media not to ask questions.


According to the revised GDP numbers released by the government on Wednesday, India’s economic growth under the previous Congress-led coalition government was slower than estimated earlier and was never in double digits.

The Central statistical office re-calibrated the data to establish a better picture of the economy and thus lowered the GDP growth rates for a majority of the previous 10 years of the UPA regime.

New GDP math punctures Congress’ claim of better economic growth rate, growth 8.5% not 10.3% in 2010-11

According to the revised GDP numbers released by the government on Wednesday, India’s economic growth under the previous Congress-led coalition government was slower than estimated earlier and was never in double digits.

The Central statistical office re-calibrated the data to establish a better picture of the economy and thus lowered the GDP growth rates for a majority of the previous 10 years of the UPA regime.

According to the back-series data, by the NITI Aayog and the government’s statistical office, the Indian economy grew at an average of 6.67 per cent in the nine years ended March 31, 2014, when UPA was in power, slower than the 7.35 per cent achieved in the four years ended March 31, 2018, with Modi as the prime minister.

It also shows that the highest growth rate the Indian economy has so far achieved is 8.5 per cent in 2010-11, against the 10.3 per cent which the Congress claimed using the older base.

As per the new series of data:

  • 2008-09 GDP growth stood at 3.1 per cent (old series estimate-3.9 per cent)
  • 2009-10, the GDP growth was 7.9 per cent (old series estimate 8.5 per cent)
  • 2010-11, the GDP growth rate was 8.5 per cent (old series estimate 10.3 per cent)

The new data series issued would now puncture the Congress’ claims who has been using the data to defend its track record and management of the economy during its 10-year tenure, in contrast with the performance of NDAs’ four years in office.

This could now stoke a political slugfest, especially because the Sudipto Mundle panel, whose rosier estimates of the UPA-era growth has now been junked by the current government.

Congress all this while has been repeatedly raising the issue of “mismanagement of the economy” and has been keen on using this point as its trump card in the campaign leading up to 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

One can now understand why former finance minister and Congress leader P Chidambaram, who himself is amidst a number of scams and allegations, rubbished the revised GDP numbers released by the Niti Aayog calling it a ‘joke’. He was then confronted by the Niti Aayog Vice Chairman who called his critique ‘disingenuous’.

The new numbers, now, seem to clear that the effects of the measures taken by the then-UPA government to tackle the crisis were exaggerated.

Telangana: BJP demands probe, says conspiracy by Congress, TRS, AIMIM to include illegal Rohingyas in voters’ list

Ahead of Telangana assembly polls, the BJP on Wednesday alleged that names of illegal Rohingya Muslims have been included in the voters’ list of 15 constituencies of Hyderabad.

The party sought a probe by the Election Commission (EC) on this joint conspiracy of the Congress, All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) and the ruling party the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS). BJP further accused the parties of deleting names from Telangana voters’ list on grounds of their community.

A delegation comprising Union Minister for Minority Affairs Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi, party general secretary Arun Singh and BJP’s national media head Anil Baluni met top EC officials to submit their memorandum in this regard.

After the meeting, Naqvi told reporters that though the Union Home Ministry had given clear instructions that Rohingya Muslims are not Indian citizens, they have been registered as voters in Telangana.

“The registration of Rohingya Muslims as voters is a clear violation of laws of the land. The Election Commission may institute a special investigation team to probe the matter,” the BJP said in its memorandum to the Commission.

The BJP alleging that there has been an exceptional increase in the number of voters as names of several fake voters and Rohingyas’ have illegally been included in the list,  demanded that electoral rolls of 15 assembly constituencies in Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation be rectified before the assembly election.

Speaking to the media, Naqvi said, “Genuine voters from a particular community and supporting a specific party have been deleted under a planned conspiracy. Names of several fake voters have been included in the list. Around 700-800 voters have the same address. Names of Rohingyas have also been included in the list. They should not be allowed to cast votes. We demanded the Election Commission to look into the loopholes before the election and take action against officers involved.”

On November 28, it has come to light, that while names of Rohingyas have been deleted from Ranga Reddy and Medak districts, 71 out of 189 names still exist in the electoral rolls of the Hyderabad district. All these illegal voters are registered under the Chandrayangutta constituency, where Akbaruddin Owaisi from the AIMIM party has been an MLA since 1999. This pinpoints a major lapse by the Telangana Election Commission.

While BJP is exerting pressure on the election commission to rectify the mistake immediately as Telangana goes for polls on December 7, the Election Commission of India (ECI) is yet to react on this disclosure, Union Minister of Minority Affairs, Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi said.

‘Kisan’ march: How long should we submit to Communist subversion tactics

Today in Delhi, Communist organizations have put together a massive rally with over one lakh people. The media are calling this a “farmers rally” instead of a Communist rally as it should rightly be called. Let’s dissect this.

In the last General Election, Communist Parties together polled only around 4% of the vote. Although the Communist Parties started out in 1952 as the largest opposition bloc, their electoral fortunes kept declining. After a few election cycles, they became confined only to Bengal, Tripura and Kerala. The last 10 years have seen the Communists routed from both Bengal and Tripura. They are ruling in Kerala at the moment but, by multiple accounts, they won’t be seen ever again in that state.

The Communists still have JNU. But any person who lives in the world of reality will admit that Communists have reached the end of their road in India as far as elections are concerned.

They are down to 4%. Chances are that more people believe in a flat earth than in Communism.

So how are the Communists making themselves count?

By subverting democracy instead of participating in it.

Fundamentally, there are two ways for them to achieve this despite their meagre 4% support base. And they are trying both.

The first is outright terrorism, which is carried out by Communists operating in the deep forests of Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Odisha. Now, Communists operating above ground insist that they have absolutely nothing to do with those operating underground. They insist that CPI(XY) is different from CPI(XX) or CPI(YY) because of one letter here and there, even though the parties are descended from the same source, often founded by the same leaders/ideologues, have the same heroes and subscribe to the same set of beliefs. They even use variations of each other’s flags to show how close they are to each other.

In election after election, people living in villages most affected by Communist terror vote in huge numbers to show their support for democracy. But a small number of Communists manage to stay relevant through sheer violence.

The second way in which Communists make themselves count is by concentrating and taking advantage of absolute numbers instead of percentages.

So what if their electoral support base is barely 4%? If you take 4% of India’s 125 crore people, that’s still 5 crore people! And yes, if you concentrate all your supporters and bring them out into the streets of *one* city, you can bring Delhi or Mumbai to a halt.

This is exactly what is happening in Delhi today. A similar thing happened in Mumbai a few months ago.

And it doesn’t help that media deliberately refuse to see the Communist colours of these marches. In Mumbai, the marchers carried a sea of red flags with the dreaded hammer and sickle symbol, but the media refused to see it and call it like it is. They called it a “farmers protest”.

This is a common template. If ABVP were to protest it would be called an “ABVP protest” because that’s exactly what it is. But if a Communist students group were to protest, it is more likely to be simply called a “students protest” in the media. The same goes for “women’s protests”. The reason is that you would find that most journalists of today have roots in Communist student unions in college.

But we have to call it what it is: subversion.

The Communists are trying to dictate terms by bringing all their supporters on the streets.

What if a mainstream party like BJP or Congress tried something similar? About 30% of the Indians support the BJP. You can’t let 5 crore Communist supporters dictate terms just because 30 crore BJP supporters are not on the streets.

That’s not a democracy. That’s jungle raj.

Are there no farmers, students, youths and women who vote for BJP? Or even for Congress?

Everyone has a right to protest but nobody has a right to be taken seriously. And today as Communists again spill out in lakhs on Delhi streets, we the people need to identify their trick and recognize it. We have to promise ourselves not to fall for the emotional blackmail.

Remember that the one lakh vocal Communists on the streets of Delhi today are here to silence the democratic mandate of 17 crore people who voted for BJP and PM Modi in the last election.

1 lakh vs 17 crores. Which is more democratic now? We cannot let the blackmail of the 1 lakh work its way through our collective consciousness.

If Communists want their agenda to be followed, they have to do it the right way. They have to go to the people and make their case and get actual votes. But Communists know they can’t win that way. So they take the path of subversion. One person who is prominently leading the protests today came fourth or fifth in his seat when he tried to fight a Lok Sabha election. People don’t want them. We can’t let them impose themselves on our democracy simply because they know too many people who work in television.

If we fall for blackmail today, we are setting ourselves up for more such subversion in the future. And we just cannot have that.

Wikileaks to sue Guardian for publishing fabricated story claiming Manafort held secret talks with Assange in Ecuadorian embassy

0

After calling out The Guarding for a fabricated story involving its founder Julian Assange, WikiLeaks on Tuesday launched a crowd-funding campaign to sue the British daily. On 27th November, The Guardian published a report which claimed that Trump ally Paul Manafort had met WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange months before the emails hacked by Russia were published by WikiLeaks.

The Guardian cites its ‘sources’ which claimed that Manafort had gone to see Assange in 2013 and 2015 and in spring 2016. While The Guardian report mentions that Manafort has denied meeting Assange, the source-based story went on to make further claims that Manafort’s first visit to the Ecuadorian embassy took place a year after Assange sought asylum.

WikiLeaks, in a series of tweets, denied any such meeting ever having taken place.


The Guardian’s Luke Harding, the author of the article, had written to Assange’s former lawyer Melinda Taylor before publication of the article to get a statement. WikiLeaks had publicly outed the email and vehemently denied the same. However, The Guardian still ran the story without the denials, claimed WikiLeaks.


WikiLeaks then pointed out how The Guardian changed the headline of the story from an assertion to a ‘source-based’ story.


WikiLeaks has even demanded the editor-in-chief to resign owing to the back-pedalling on the story, WikiLeaks claims to be false.


As of now, WikiLeaks has raised $29,315 from 573 people to sue The Guardian and has urged people to contribute so that it can help “send a signal that the media will pay a price for fake news.”

WikiLeaks is an international non-profit organisation that publishes secret information, news leaks, and classified media provided by anonymous sources founded by Julian Assange.

Yogi compares Rahul Gandhi with the BTech student who failed 17 compartments in 9 years

0

BJP’s star campaigner and Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Yogi Adityanath, while addressing an election rally at Ajmer, Rajasthan, compared Congress President Rahul Gandhi with the engineering student who was awarded 17 compartments during four years of his engineering degree.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzzULV5L5ng]

Yogi said that when he was reading a newspaper at the Jaipur airport, he saw the news about a BTech student who was awarded 17 compartments. The student could not clear the compartments in 9 years and had approached the court requesting to allow him another attempt to clear all the papers. The court rejected the student’s petition and said that he should waste the nation’s resources and should show some pity on the court as well as the nation.

Taking a jibe at Rahul Gandhi, Yogi said that Congress cannot win any election under the leadership of Rahul Gandhi. The party has lost elections in 17 States under his leadership and therefore now Rahul Gandhi should also show some pity on the nation.

Yogi said that even Congress party leaders now feel that the party cannot win any elections under Rahul Gandhi’s leadership.

General Rawat warns about the ongoing demography change in POK

Delivering 9th YB Chavan Lecture at Institute of Defence Studies and Analyses, General Bipin Rawat talked about the ongoing “hybrid warfare”, unleashed by Pakistan on India.

The ongoing hybrid war with India

General Rawat, talked about the well-sequenced and coordinated hybrid warfare currently India is facing. Rawat said that its prime target is our population and infrastructure, instead of the military establishment. He added that be it a 1947-48 war, 1965 or 1999 Kargil War with Pakistan, or “Disruptive techniques” like stone-pelting and school closures all are part of the hybrid war, engineered by Government agencies of Pakistan.

General Rawat advised India to opt for an “Offensive-defence” strategy to counter the hybrid war instead of tit-for-tat strategy like unleashing the same war on Pakistan’s population.

The Army Chief also underlined that the radicalisation of youth in Jammu and Kashmir is happening through manufactured narratives peddled by anti-India forces.

“People are back from schools and colleges and there is nothing else to do other than watch television and look at mobile phones. These messages (in phones) convey everything negative and falsehood,”  General Rawat said.

Demography Change going on in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir

General Rawat, said that India should initiate the strengthening of security infrastructure in the valley, and muster resources to counter the prevailing narrative of falsehoods and indoctrinations.

“The issue on the other side is that Pakistan has very cleverly changed the entire demography of PoK, Gilgit Baltistan. We are not sure as to who is an actual Kashmiri or a Punjabi who has come and occupied the area. The Kashmiri identity has been gradually eroded very cleverly by Pakistan,”  Rawat was quoted.

Kartarpur Sahib corridor

After the lecture General responded to several questions. He was asked about the issue of opening of Kartarpur Sahib corridor, and whether it was a step towards engagement with Pakistan.

General Rawat, responded that India is firm on its stand, that terror and talks cannot go hand-in-hand. He made clear that Kartarpur Sahib corridor should be seen in isolation, as already declared by Minister of External Ministry Sushma Swaraj.

General Rawat’s previous takes on National Security

In the month of November, talking about the proxy war waged by China and Pakistan on India, General Rawat had said the changing demographics of states of North-east like Assam is the result of the deliberate influx of Bangladeshis in the region. He had cited the example of the ascent of the party called All India United Democratic Front) AIUDF, active in Assam which made its first electoral presence in 2005 and now has currently had three parliamentarians in Lok Sabha and 13 legislators in the state assembly.

Army Chief had said that  Badruddin Ajmal-led AIUDF, had grown alarmingly faster than the BJP in the 1980s.

Army Chief Bipin Rawat recently had stated that external forces are attempting to revive the Khalistani insurgency in Punjab.