Monday, May 13, 2024
Home Blog Page 851

Madhya Pradesh: Retired engineer’s divorce case finalised by Gwalior court after 38 years, had filed in 1985

An unusual case has surfaced in Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, where a couple endured a staggering 38-year wait for their divorce. The husband had filed for divorce in 1985, and remarkably, the court has now granted their divorce on the very same application.

After nearly four decades of legal proceedings, the court has finally permitted the dissolution of their marriage. The duration of the wait has extended to the point where even the children of this engineer, who initially sought the divorce, have since gotten married.

The engineer’s arduous divorce case originated in the Bhopal Court and subsequently traversed through the Vidisha Family Court, the Family Court of Gwalior, the High Court, and ultimately reached the Supreme Court. The retired engineer, residing in Bhopal, had filed for divorce from his wife, who is a resident of Gwalior. After an astonishing 38-year legal journey, he has finally been granted permission to legally part ways with his first wife.

In 1981, the engineer entered into matrimony with his first wife. However, their marriage faced challenges as they remained childless, leading to their separation in 1985. Subsequently, in July of the same year, the husband filed for divorce in the Bhopal Court citing the inability of his first wife to conceive, but his plea was denied.

Undeterred, he pursued another divorce application in the Vidisha Court. On the other hand, in December 1989, the wife took a different approach by applying to the Family Court in Gwalior, seeking restoration of conjugal rights. The couple’s conflicting appeals against each other prolonged the legal battle, keeping this case entangled in the courts for an extensive period.

The court initially granted the husband’s divorce application, deeming him eligible for separation, but the first wife contested the ruling, leading to the acceptance of her appeal in court. In April 2000, the pending divorce case in Vidisha was dismissed. Subsequently, the husband pursued an appeal in the High Court, which also turned down his plea in 2006. Not giving up, he filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court, only to have it rejected in 2008. Still determined, he initiated another divorce application in the same year. However, in July 2015, the Vidisha court once again rejected his application, prompting him to file an appeal in the Gwalior bench of the High Court. After an enduring 38-year ordeal, the High Court finally granted the divorce, bringing an end to their prolonged legal battle.

Following their separation, the husband and wife had been living apart, and in 1990, the husband remarried. From his second marriage, the retired engineer has two children, both of whom are now married. After an exhaustive 38-year legal battle, the husband and his first wife have finally reached an agreement for divorce by mutual consent. The High Court, in its directive, has ordered the husband to make a lump sum payment of Rs 12 lakh to his wife as alimony.

The woman’s father, being a police officer, was resolute in preventing the disintegration of his daughter’s marriage, leading her to persistently appeal to the court to halt the divorce proceedings. However, after the woman’s brothers intervened and persuaded both the husband and wife, they finally reached a mutual agreement to proceed with the divorce by consent.

Rahul Gandhi’s Prime Ministerial dreams come back to life as MP status is restored: Here is how the drama started, peaked, and came a full circle

Rahul Gandhi’s Prime Ministerial aspirations have been revived after his Lok Sabha (LS) membership was restored earlier today. A notification released by the LS Secretariat reads, “In view of the order dated 04.08.2023 of the Supreme Court, the disqualification of Shri Rahul Gandhi has ceased to operate subject to further judicial pronouncements.”

The development comes three days after the apex court on 4th August stayed Congress leader and Wayanad MP Rahul Gandhi’s conviction in a 2019 criminal defamation case over his Modi surname remark. The apex court had also restored his status as a member of Parliament.

The restoration of his MP status has given Congress something to celebrate brand Rahul Gandhi about even as the Opposition alliance I.N.D.I.A. grapples with selecting a PM candidate and RaGa seems far from their first choice.

Even so, leaders from the alliance have jumped in to congratulate Rahul Gandhi to grab a piece of the pie for the brand I.N.D.I.A. Rahul Gandhi was quick to restore his status in his Twitter bio as “Member of Parliament”.

Not to forget the time when he had insulted Amethi voters, who had elected him, while campaigning in Wayanad in 2021. Whether his return as LS MP from Wayanad will bear well for the constituency or not remains to be seen.

A timeline of events

In April 2019, Rahul Gandhi mocked Prime Minister Narendra Modi at a Lok Sabha election rally in Karnataka saying by asking “Why do all thieves share the Modi surname”. “Nirav Modi, Lalit Modi, Narendra Modi… how come they all have Modi as a common surname? How come all thieves have Modi as a common surname?” Gandhi had made the remark at a campaign rally in Kolar, Karnataka.

A complaint was then filed by BJP MLA Surat Purnesh Modi against the Congress leader for defaming the entire Modi community. Former Congress President Rahul Gandhi was booked under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code, which deal with criminal defamation.

On 10th October, Rahul pleaded not guilty before a Surat court in connection with the case. He suffered his first setback in March this year, when the Surat District Court held him guilty. Following his conviction, the former Congress President was disqualified from the Lok Sabha on 24th March.

He was disqualified under section 8(3) of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951, which states that any MP or MLA convicted of any offense and sentenced to imprisonment for not less than two years shall be disqualified from the date of conviction.

The notification issued by the Lok Sabha secretariate had said:

Consequent upon his conviction by the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat in C.C./18712/2019, Shri Rahul Gandhi, Member of Lok Sabha representing the Wayanad Parliamentary Constituency of Kerala stands disqualified from the membership of Lok Sabha from the date of his conviction i.e. 23 March, 2023 in terms of the provisions of Article 102(1)(e) of the Constitution of India read with Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

A petition was then filed by the Congress leader in the Supreme Court a day after seeking that such disqualifications of elected representatives be deemed as “illegal”. In a press conference on 25th March, Rahul Gandhi blatantly said that he will not apologise for his remarks.

“I am a Gandhi and not Savarkar, and Gandhis do not apologise,” he had said. On 3rd April, the Surat court extended bail granted to Rahul Gandhi in a defamation case till April 13.

However, his plea seeking suspension of two-year sentence was rejected by the Surat Sessions Court on 20th April.

Gandhi then moved the Gujarat HC challenging the Surat court’s refusal to give a stay on his conviction. On 7th July the HC too refused to stay his conviction. Following this he approached the Supreme Court on 15th July.

In what was his last resort, Rahul Gandhi gave his best shot in the SC arguing that if the decision is not overturned, it will severely impede free speech, expression, and thought.

In his plea, Rahul Gandhi contended that allowing the High Court’s decision to stand will gradually erode democratic institutions, leading to the stifling of democracy and negatively impacting the future of India’s political landscape. The Congress leader vehemently refuted the complainant’s claim that his speech defamed individuals bearing the Modi surname. Finally, on 4th August, his convicted was stayed and his disqualification was revoked on 7th August.

Meanwhile, Twitterati has erupted on both sides of the political spectrum taking a dig at each other.

Rahul Gandhi loyalists are in celebration mode whereas Opposition alliance leaders too are not behind in trying to score brownie points.

Congress would like to project Rahul Gandhi as the default PM candidate. However, not many in the Opposition camp have shown any interest in that regard. With Rahul back as an MP, the political plot for the Lok Sabha elections just got more interesting.

After whining about Rahul Gandhi’s video being ‘algorithmically suppressed’, Congress celebrates his mythical YouTube success: What the real numbers say

The Congress seems to have thought of a brand new strategy to re-launch Rahul Gandhi for the millionth time. The Hindu published an article hailing the social media connect of Rahul Gandhi and talking about how his YouTube channel has zoomed ahead. The Leftist publication, which had helped Rahul Gandhi further his Rafale lies with fabricated documents, also quoted an ‘internal assessment’, claiming that while Rahul Gandhi’s YouTube channel is not as popular as that of Prime Minister Modi, it still outshines the latter in per video average views.

“There is still a long way for Mr. Gandhi to outstrip Prime Minister Narendra Modi who globally has one of the largest social media presence (his YouTube channel has over 16 million subscribers), the Congress claims that Mr. Gandhi lately has better statistics in terms of audience engagement. As per the Congress’s internal assessment, Mr. Gandhi’s videos on an average get 3,43,000 views, while the average views on Mr. Modi’s channel is 56,000. Mr. Gandhi’s videos get on average 1,700 comments and Mr. Modi’s videos get 137 comments“, the report claimed.

The report also tried to repackage the image of Rahul Gandhi to mirror that of PM Modi in his pre-2014 phase where Narendra Modi was perhaps the first world leader to use social media extensively and as a tool to reach out to his electorate. With the media being heavily biased against him, social media became the medium of choice for Modi.

The Hindu report tries to recast Rahul Gandhi in that mould by claiming that Rahul Gandhi has often criticised the mainstream media’s bias against him and thus, used social media effectively. “When most mainstream communication mediums are controlled by the BJP, there was no other option but for us to get our message to people through alternative platforms like YouTube. We realise these platforms cannot be a perfect substitute for mainstream mediums but this was the only alternative,” The Hindu quoted Praveen Chakravarty, who heads Congress’ Data Analytics Department. 

While the Congress is celebrating Rahul Gandhi’s mythical YouTube popularity, it becomes imperative to note a few points. Firstly, Congress is using the metric ‘average views per video’ to compare Rahul Gandhi’s success to that of PM Modi. The Hindu says, “As per the Congress’s internal assessment, Mr. Gandhi’s videos on average get 3,43,000 views, while the average number of views on PM Modi’s channel is 56,000. Gandhi’s videos get on average 1,700 comments and Mr. Modi’s videos get 137 comments”. However, the per-video engagement is no metric at all, given that averaging out would depend on how many videos a channel uploads.

The metric that The Hindu fails to mention is that PM Modi’s YouTube gained approximately 25.46 Crore views in the last 1 month while Rahul Gandhi’s YouTube gained approximately 4.82 Crore views in the last 1 month. Also, PM Modi’s YouTube gained approximately 75.79 crore views this year while Rahul Gandhi’s YouTube gained approximately 25.38 Crore views this year.

What is also interesting is that this celebration of Rahul Gandhi’s mythical YouTube success comes only 4 months after The Hindu ran another Congress handout where Congress whined about Rahul Gandhi’s video ranting against Gautam Adani after the Hindenberg fiasco had been ‘algorithmically suppressed by YouTube”.

In March 2023, Congress had alleged in a letter to YouTube that former Congress president Rahul Gandhi’s videos on industrialist Gautam Adani have fewer views despite similar user engagement as other videos. The party has further alleged that the browse feature for these specific videos seems to have been “algorithmically suppressed”. 

Essentially, Congress had insinuated that somehow, YouTube was also doing PM Modi’s bidding. If that were true then, one has to wonder what changed in the past 4 months for YouTube to suddenly like Rahul Gandhi again. What is more likely, however, is that Congress was exaggerating and crying victim then and is celebrating a mythical success today, because according to political requirements, they need one of these two narratives to keep getting played up in the media.

Fake cases under SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act abuse of the process of law, clogging judicial system: Karnataka HC

While quashing the criminal prosecution under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against two brothers, the Karnataka High Court strongly criticised the misuse of legal provisions of the act. The court categorically highlighted that on account of false cases under the SC/ST Act or others, the judicial system gets clogged leaving the genuine petitioners to suffer the ill consequences of it. 

The case in question under the SC/ST act

The case in question pertains to a property dispute between two neighbours whose allegedly disputed properties are adjacent to each other. The fathers of the petitioners and complainant made transactions during their lifetime and the said property had been in the possession of two petitioners for nearly five decades. 

This was later contested by the complainant claiming that the documents of the property were forged. Along with that, the petitioners were facing prosecution under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The petitioners’ neighbour complained to Bengaluru’s Ramamurthy Nagar police station immediately after the police had filed a chargesheet against him for house trespassing and continuous harassment. The earlier complaint to the police was made by the two petitioners. 

Subsequently, petitioners Purushotham and Rasik Lal Patel challenged these proceedings initiated against them. They highlighted that apart from various sections of the IPC, they were framed under various provisions of SC/ST acts as well. 

According to the petitioners, later the court found these submissions to be true, all the transactions had happened between the father of the complainant and the father of the petitioners during their lifetime. Further, they had had the subject property for the last 50 years. Their properties and properties which came under the share of the complainant’s father are adjacent to each other. 

The petitioners asserted that the matter is purely civil but has been given a colour of crime.

Strong observations of the court on misuse of the act and abuse of process of law

The single-judge bench of Justice M Nagaprasanna observed that the present case is a classic example of “an abuse of the process of law” and misuse of provisions of the SC/ST act. 

He said, “This case would form a classic illustration of misuse of the provisions of the Act and the penal provisions under the IPC. It is such cases which clog the criminal justice system and consume the considerable time of the Courts, be it the Magistrates Court, Court of Session or this Court, while genuine cases where litigants have suffered would be waiting in the pipeline.”

Justice Nagaprasanna pointed out that the complainant had admitted that the subject properties were jointly acquired by V.Muniyappa and his father. Later, they were sold to the father of the petitioners on different dates by three sale deeds. However, the complainant claimed that he is not aware of the execution of sale deeds as he was not a party to them. The court added that the moment the charge sheet was filed against the complainant, the impugned complaint springs up alleging several offences. 

The court elaborated reasons on why the case was not made out on any of the sections of IPC or provisions of the SC/ST act, the court stated that this arouse only for vengeance against the petitioners and is only a counterblast to what has been stated above. 

The court added there are multiple instances of abuse of process of law in the present case. 

The court said, “It is not one but there are several hues of abuses of the process of law in the case at hand. Knowing fully well that the father of the complainant had sold the properties to the petitioners or the father of the petitioners, the crime comes to be registered contending that he is not aware of the same and, therefore, the documents are forged. All of them are registered public documents under which the petitioners or their fathers have had the properties for the last 50 years. It is un-understandable as to how a crime could be registered on the aforesaid facts.”

First Kerala Speaker AN Shamseer insults Lord Ganesha, now P Jayarajan insults Bhagwan Parashuram. BJP hits out at Pinarayi Vijayan govt

BJP National Secretary Anil K Antony has hit out at the Pinarayi Vijayan government in Kerala for insulting Hindu gods. Quoting local news reports, the BJP leader said it’s very disappointing and shocking to see the top echelon of Kerala’s ruling party continuously insult the sentiments of crores of Hindu believers across the world.

“A few days back the speaker of the Kerala Legislative Assembly Sri. Shamseer insulted Lord Ganesha by calling him a myth. Today another senior @CPIMKerala leader Sri. P Jayarajan insults Lord Parashuram by talking on very similar lines. It’s very disappointing and shocking to see the top echelon of Kerala’s ruling party continuously insult the sentiments of crores of Hindu believers across the world for their short-term political expediency and for appeasing a certain section of the minorities they see as their important vote bank. They all should unconditionally apologise for their statements,” Antony tweeted on 6th August, Sunday.

He added, “Does any of the other I.N.D.I.A. alliance partners that share the stage with this party including @RahulGandhi and the @INCIndia endorse these views? Is anyone willing to correct them / disown these statements?”

Antony’s attack came a day after senior CPI(M) leader from Kannur P Jayarajan reportedly insulted Bhagwan Parashuram while delivering a speech in Kasaragod on 5th August, Saturday.

The former CPI(M) MLA said that Lord Parashuram is a myth and that the story of the origin of Kerala is made up by Brahmins. Making casteist remarks, Jayarajan said that the Kerala origin story was “cooked up by Brahmins to enslave the people and gives Brahmins rights all over Kerala.” He also called the Hindu belief in the origin of Kerala a myth.

On 21st July, Kerala Assembly Speaker AN Shamseer made similar insulting remarks for Hindu Deity Lord Ganesha while addressing a speech during a program at a school in Ernakulam. He said that the Centre should teach the children about accomplishments in science and technology instead of Hindu myths. He used Lord Ganesha and Pushpak Vimana as an example to call out “Hindu myths”.

Responding to a question on who invented the airplane, Shamseer said the Wright brothers. He added that Hindus believe Pushpak Vimana to be the first airplane as mentioned in Ramayana. He followed this up with the story of Lord Ganesha saying that Hindus believe that he acquired his elephant face through plastic surgery, which he called a myth. Shamseer said, “They are promoting such myths in place of science.”

A complaint was lodged by the BJP and the comments were met with large-scale protests by the Nair Service Society (NSS) which organized “Faith Protection Day” on 2nd August. The organization had asked all its members to visit Ganesha temples. They were later booked by the Kerala government for “unlawful assembly”.

NSS General Secretary G Sukumaran Nair reportedly said, “That is foolish, who found out about it? These people say that if you go to heaven there are hoories, who went to heaven and returned to tell them that there are hoories in heaven? So commenting on that has no meaning.”

The BJP too had demanded an unconditional apology from the Speaker of the Kerala Assembly saying that the leader had hurt Hindu sentiments.

Shamseer issued a clarification saying he is not against any religion. However, it should be noted that he pitched science against “Hindu” myths thereby targeting the Hindu religion alone.

Even as controversy was brewing over Shamseer’s insulting statement, Kerala CPI(M) State Secretary MV Govindan too said Lord Ganesha is a myth. Shockingly, when asked about Allah, he said not all beliefs are myths.

While addressing a press briefing on the controversial remarks made by the Speaker, Govindan said, “Is Ganapati science then? Let us look at myths as myths only. The formation of Kerala is also a myth, right? We are not against believers.”

But when asked if Allah is a myth, he said, “I didn’t say all Gods are myths. Unlike Hindus, Muslims don’t have 1000s of Gods. They believe in a higher concept single God!”

The Kerala Assembly is likely to erupt today as the BJP has surrounded the CPI(M) government on the back-to-back controversial comments by the latter’s leaders targeting the Hindu faith.

SC dismisses plea by Tamil Nadu minister Senthil Balaji, wife challenging ED custody in a money laundering case

On Monday (7 August), the Supreme Court dismissed the petitions filed by Tamil Nadu Minister Senthil Balaji and his wife Megala challenging the custody sought by the Enforcement Directorate in the money laundering case. The apex court also allowed ED to have the custody of Minister Balaji till 12 August in the cash-for-jobs scam case.

Two separate petitions were filed by Minister Balaji and his wife Megala before the apex court. The petitions challenged the Madras High Court order dated 14th of July. The High Court had held that the ED was entitled to take Balaji into police custody. The apex court also rejected their plea in which they had contended that the arrest by the ED was illegal. 

The two judge-bench of Justices A S Bopanna and M M Sundresh also held that a writ of habeas corpus was not maintainable against the arrest by the ED. The court held that an order of remand cannot be challenged in a habeas corpus petition. However, the court added that in case of violation of any procedure for arrest as prescribed in Section 19 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), then action can be taken against the concerned officer.

The 2-judge bench cited the earlier Supreme Court order passed in the Anupam Kulkarni case. In that case, the court had held that police custody is not permissible beyond the first 15 days of remand. However, citing this judgement, the bench has referred the issue of extension of police custody beyond the first 15 days to a larger bench for reconsideration.

Tamil Nadu Minister of Electricity, Prohibition and Excise Senthil Balaji was arrested on the 14th of June but he still continues to be a minister without portfolio in the M K Stalin government. The Enforcement Directorate arrested him in connection with the cash-for-jobs scam which surfaced in 2015 in the state’s transport department. During the 2011-16 AIADMK government, Balaji was the transport minister.

He was arrested after the Supreme Court’s order in May had overturned the Madras High Court’s decision in which the High Court had halted the proceedings in the money laundering case against him.

On the day of arrest, the ED interrogated him for almost 18 hours and searched his official residence and chamber at the state Secretariat before making the arrest. 

Following his arrest, his wife Megala filed a habeas corpus petition before the High Court on the day of his arrest and argued that the arrest and detention were illegal. The High Court didn’t grant him interim bail. Later, a two-judge division bench of the High Court delivered a split verdict in the habeas corpus plea. Following the split verdict, the third judge in the case, Justice CV Karthikeyan, ruled in favour of the ED. 

Today’s order from Supreme Court is a major setback for Tamil Nadu Minister, who would have to remain in ED custody for another 5 days till 12 August. 

Shame on you: Netizens slam Youtuber Abhisar Sharma after Chinese financing of NewsClick emerges

A day after The New York Times published a report, revealing how the leftist propaganda organisation NewsClick received funds from a Chinese Communist Party supporter, netizens slammed ‘journalist’ turned Youtuber Abhisar Sharma on Sunday (August 6).

Popular Twitter user Ankur Singh wrote, “Shocking! New York Times investigation reveals NewsClick media portal in which @abhisar_sharma works is funded by China to do propaganda in India. Don’t forget Congress supports and promotes @newsclickin. Why? Because of Chinese MoU?”

“After India now even investigations in US tells NewsClick media where lipstick YouTuber @abhisar_sharma works is funded by China to do propaganda in India,” tweeted another user (@ChillamChilli).

“How’s The josh, Abhisar Sharma. In 2021, ED probed media portal NewsClick & found its funding linked to China. At that time, leftists called it attack on freedom of press Now, after 2 years, leftists favorite New York Times (NYT) also reported that NewsClick is funded by China. Funded for Chinese propaganda?What Newsclick was doing by Chinese Funding?” another user inquired.

Popular user (@IamGMishra) slammed Abhisar Sharma for being a ‘traitor (gaddar)’. He tweeted, “Shame on @abhisar_sharma for taking Chinese money & running propaganda against India. India Ka #Gaddar! You will not see any tweet from liberals & Congressi against #NewsClick & D@lla (pimp) Abhisar: Sab Chor hai Sa@le! (all of them are thieves).”

“USA media investigation reveals NewsClick is funded by China to do propaganda in India. Can @abhisar_sharma explain the remittance received by @newsclickin classified as FDI of Rs 9.59 cr from April 2018, and another of Rs 20.92 cr, shown as receipts for “export of services”?” asked Rishi Bagree.

Twitter user ‘Star Boy’ wrote, “Newsclick – China Link (Expose). Is Indian portal Newsclick working for Chinese propaganda? Is Abhisar Sharma a Chinese agent? Was China behind Bhima Koregaon Violence? What is Digipub cartel? Role of Congress”

It must be mentioned that Abhisar Sharma features regularly on NewsClick videos wherein he is seen either defending the Congress party or furthering anti-India narratives.

The Chinese government is infamous for swaying public opinion in its favour through its propaganda machinery, which ranges from educational institutes to media publications.

Abhisar Sharma regularly features in propaganda videos of NewsClick

NewsClick is financed by Chinese Communist Party supporter

On Saturday (August 5), The New York Times published a detailed article, revealing the ties of an American businessman with the Chinese government and his financial support to an Indian leftist propaganda outlet named NewsClick.

According to the US-based newspaper, a millionaire named Neville Roy Singham is funding several news publications across the world (including India) to peddle Chinese propaganda.

“What is less known, and is hidden amid a tangle of nonprofit groups and shell companies, is that Mr. Singham works closely with the Chinese government media machine and is financing its propaganda worldwide,” the article stated.

The New York Times pointed out that Singham has been successful in disseminating Chinese government talking points under the pretext of ‘progressive advocacy’ in countries such as India, Brazil, South Africa and the United States.

Screengrab of the news report by The New York Times

Neville Roy Singham, who holds strong ties with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), is at the forefront of China’s smokeless war.

In its article, The New York Times stated, “Under the rule of Xi Jinping, China has expanded state media operations, teamed up with overseas outlets and cultivated foreign influencers. The goal is to disguise propaganda as independent content.”

It further added, “The result is a seemingly organic bloom of far-left groups that echo Chinese government talking points, echo one another, and are echoed in turn by the Chinese state media.”

During its investigation, the American newspaper found that Neville Roy Singham had financed an India-based leftist propaganda outlet named NewsClick. It noted that the news outlet had repeated the talking points of the CCP in the past.

“In New Delhi, corporate filings show, Mr. Singham’s network financed a news site, NewsClick, that sprinkled its coverage with Chinese government talking points. “China’s history continues to inspire the working classes,” one video said,” noted The New York Times.

‘Magistrate seems to have hurriedly passed order’: Gauhati HC quashes FIR against Assam CM Himanta Biswa Sarma in alleged hate speech case

0

On 3rd August, Gauhati High Court quashed Magistrate orders to register a First Information Report (FIR) against Assam Chief Minister Dr Himanta Biswa Sarma in an alleged hate speech case. The Magistrate orders came on the complaint of Assam Congress MP Abdul Khaleque for a speech at CM Biswa’s game in the backdrop of the Sipajhar eviction drive in September 2021.

In a speech in Morigaon district after the eviction drive, CM Sarma referred to the incidents of violence as “revenge” for the eviction. In his order, Justice Ajit Borthakur said the Magistrate seemed to have passed the order of registering an FIR against CM Sarma in a hurry without hearing what he said or what police officers found during the investigation. Earlier, police officials said in their report that no cognisable offence was made out during the speech by CM Sarma.

Justice Borthakur said, “The learned Magistrate seems to have hurriedly passed the impugned order on 05.03.2022 on the same day of receipt of the petition on transfer to his Court for disposal, after hearing the complainant side only, which certainly occasioned a gross failure of justice and abuse of the process of the Court.”

The High Court observed that the words used by CM Sarma in the matter could not be deemed as “communally inflammatory”. Justice Borthakur added, “The whole text of the speech in question did not bear any word or sentence which can be termed as communally inflammatory speech attracting any penal cognisable offence.”

Calling it an error of judgment by the Magistrate, High Court opined that the order was passed “without properly considering the allegations” against the Chief Minister. Though Magistrates have the power to direct probe the petitions under Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, that does not mean that police must register an FIR.

The court noted that Khaleque narrated the speech in a conjecturable manner inter alia, terming it as ‘maliciously given a communal colour’ with reference to the alleged killings of Moinul Hoque and Sheikh Farid’ and other incidents.

Furthermore, the High Court remarked that the investigation of the complaint made it clear that no cognisable offence was made against the CM that would have led to the registration of a criminal case against him. The court said, “[it] contains apparently different narration of facts overlapping each other, clouding the multifarious allegations generated therein, which cannot be construed to have disclosed any cognisable offence to the police, requiring to be mandatorily registered.”

Gauhati magistrate’s orders to register FIR

In 2022, the Gauhati magistrate court ordered police to file a criminal complaint against CM Sarma over allegedly inflammatory remarks in the speech from December 2021. Following the orders, the Assam government and the Guwahati police moved to Gauhati High Court, challenging the orders.

Notably, in a report, Deputy Commissioner of Police, East District, Guwahati City Police Commissionerate, Kamrup(M), Assam, said, “During enquiry the audio clipping of the comments given in a public meeting in Morigaon district is collected for ascertaining the truth of the allegation if any cognizable offence is made out on prima facie basis. The enquiry has been conducted thoroughly taking note of every aspect meticulously. However after making a thorough enquiry and detailed examination of the speech made by the honourable CM, I found no any offence appeared to be committed by the honourable CM of Assam for creating disharmony among the different communities of Assam in absence of specific reference to the name of any particular community. The speech so delivered carried neither any provocation nor incitation against one community with others. The statement so delivered carried only the past history what the bonafide assamese people had faced. The entire version delivered by honourable CM of Assam was of creative nature wherein no matter was there affecting interest of the other community.”

In the order, Kamrup Metro district Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate B Baruah observed the police needed to register FIR against CM Sarma. The order came on the complaint of Khaleque, who had said CM Sarma’s remarks that “events at Gorkhuti an act of ‘revenge’ for 1983, the Hon’ble Chief Minister is giving wanton provocation to people to commit further acts of rioting against the particular community of the
state.” He added that CM Sarma’s remarks were “intending to cause disharmony or feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will towards the Muslim population of Assam.” He sought FIR against CM Sarma at Dispur Police Station under Sections 153 and 153A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Punjab and Haryana HC takes suo moto notice of demolition of illegal structures in Nuh, puts a stay

0

On Monday, August 7, the Punjab and Haryana High Court stayed the Haryana government’s demolition drive on the illegal encroachments being carried out by the Haryana administration after rioters unleashed violence in the Nuh district of Haryana on July 31 during the Jalabhishek Shobha yatra.

According to Live Law, a bench of Justice GS Sandhwalia passed orders to stay demolitions in Nuh until further orders. A notice has been issued to the state govt and the matter is to be heard again at 3 pm today.

According to reports, Deputy Commissioner Dhirendra Khadgata asked officials concerned to stop the bulldozer action following the high court ruling. Demolitions of illegal encroachments in Nuh continued for the fourth day on Sunday.

The HC passed these orders while taking suo motu cognizance of the demolition drive carried out by the state government after the Nuh violence. The court also questioned the Haryana government’s demolition drive launched after residents claimed they were not given any notice by the administration.

The local administration had, however, said they were taking action against illegal constructions and encroachment and no individual was being targeted.

“Demolition drive against illegal construction is underway and it will continue. Action is not being taken to target anyone. Our motive is to establish peace,” Khadgata said on Sunday, August 6.

Notably, the cracked down on the illegal encroachments of over 200 rioters began on the afternoon of Thursday, 3rd August 2023, three days after Islamists ran riots in the Nuh district of Haryana.

While adopting Yogi Adityanath’s signature bulldozer system, the local administration in Tauru in Nuh bulldozed 250 houses of illegal immigrants. Reportedly, many of them were part of the recent rioting in the Mewat region.

The encroachments had cropped up on Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP) land in the past 4 years and were mostly inhabited by illegal immigrants from Bangladesh.

Building from where stones were pelted during Nuh violence demolished as bulldozer action 

During the demolition drive, the state administration also demolished the three-story house which was used by the Islamist mob for stone pelting on Hindus. The video of several people pelting stones from the now-demolished house had gone viral on social media. 

Nuh Shobha Yatra attack

On Monday, violence broke out in Haryana’s Nuh district during the ‘Brij Mandal Jalabhishek Yatra,’ which was organized by Vishwa Hindu Parishad and Bajrang Dal. The death toll from the clashes has now reached 6, including two personnel from the Haryana home guard. The deputy commissioner urged people to stay indoors, venture outside only for essential tasks, and disregard any circulating rumours.

Vehicles were burnt and stones pelted at the Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s Jalabhishek Yatra as Islamists unleashed violence against thousands of Hindus in the Muslim-dominated region of Nuh, Mewat in Haryana.

Claims of women raped at Nuh: What police say, what organisers and temple mahant say, and what toilet cleaners of ISIS are aiming at

On the 31st of July 2023, Islamists unleashed unbridled violence against Hindu devotees carrying out a Jalabhishek yatra organised by the VHP. So far, over 100 FIRs have been filed, 202 people have been arrested and the death count stands at 6. The Islamists, in a pre-planned attack, hurled stones at the devotees, fired shots, and burnt cars, creating hostage-like situations where several thousand devotees were trapped in a Temple, only to be rescued hours after the Islamists were raining down bullets on the temple and more.

Amidst the coverage of the brutality unleashed by Islamists and documenting the Hindu victims who witnessed the violence, 2 YouTube channels uploaded videos of a ground report. In those reports, it was claimed that in the surrounding hills of the Nalhar Temple, where at least 2000 devotees were stuck in a hostage like situation as Islamists rained bullets from the mountainous area, torn clothes of women had been found. There were also allegations by some locals that there are speculations that some women were dragged to the fields and raped by the Islamists and murdered.

Hours after this ground report was published, the ADGP of Haryana Police, Mamata Singh, refuted the claims made in the report summarily. She said that the claims were false and action would be taken against those who were making these claims.

According to the Additional Director General of Police (ADGP), Haryana Mamata Singh no such incident took place during the clashes as she herself was present there on the spot. 

“A narrative is going on social media since yesterday that the day the devotees were stuck at Nalhar Mandir, gruesome crimes like rape occurred with a few women devotees there during this. I would like to tell you that this is false, a complete rumour,” Mamata Singh told the reporters. 

She further said that strict action will be taken against such rumour-mongers. “I am saying this officially as I was present there during the entire incident. Nothing like that happened with any woman. We have already cleared that what actually happened there…Strict action will be taken against such rumour-mongers,” the ADGP said. She also said that as many as 216 people have been arrested in connection with the violence-related incidents in the state. 

After the Haryana police ADGP issued a clarification, several individuals who had shared the viral video deleted their tweets, while several still exist online. In fact, OpIndia had covered the story based on the YouTube channel ground report as well. The OpIndia Hindi report was temporarily unavailable because we were trying to dig for more information and update the report so our readers have adequate information. While I would come to that later, it becomes imperative to first examine the issue at hand.

Speaking to OpIndia, the Mahant of the Nalhar Temple refuted the claims that women had been raped during the violence as well. He said that such stories are being concocted because vested interests want to scare devotees away from coming the the Temple. Speaking to OpIndia, even VHP functionaries said that such reports were misplaced. We were told that women and children had mostly reached Nuh in the morning and had entered the Nalhar Temple for the Jalabhisehk. They were in the Temple while the Islamist onslaught started. While the Temple came under attack, the women and children only left the temple premises while they were being rescued by the police and therefore, he was positive that no incident of rape occurred with the women devotees. The VHP functionary did they say that it was entirely possible that during the violence, there may have been some women who were molested, however, he was confident that no incident of rape has occurred.

He believed that such stories were being floated to tarnish the image of VHP and Bajrang Dal as the organisation who defend Hindus on the streets, painting them as organisations that cannot even safeguard women travelling with them. He believed that by doing so, vested interests wanted to discourage women from participating in Hindu religious processions.

The Mahant of the temple also said that in the pandemonium, where they have been some cases of molestation of women by Islamists, women may have dropped their extra clothes, bags, personal items etc. This could have led to locals speculating about the incidents of rape and abduction.

I would, for what it is worth, trust these two sources – one is an eyewitness and the other, is a part of the organisation that organised the religious procession. It is in the light of this that OpIndia decided to update its report.

Assertions by Islamists of ‘paid actors’ posing to be witnesses and why I don’t trust that trope

When these ground reports started circulating and the version of the locals were being shared on social media, the usual suspects like AltNews’ Mohammad Zubair started demanding FIRs against those discussing the report.

Taking to Twitter, Mohammad Zubair wrote that he had spoken to ADGP Mamata Singh who ‘confirmed’ to him that no complaints of sexual assault had been received and therefore, these claims are fake. He then urged Nuh police to get in touch with the YouTube channels that had published this ground report and take appropriate action. He called these “unverified claims”.

“Hope @nuhpolice @police_haryana get’s in touch with these YouTube channels and the people they spoke to get more details as the people in the video claim that they were eye witness. If there in no truth to these claims, These YouTube channels and people spreading these propaganda should be book for running Anti Muslim propaganda”, he wrote.

Interestingly, he branded this ground report “anti-Muslim propaganda”.

Almost out of nowhere, Zubair, in the same thread, claimed that “most of these YouTube channels are known to use “paid actors for their propaganda”. Now, it is to be noted that he did not directly say that the witnesses in the video itself were paid actors because he had no proof for it. He also provided no evidence of which YouTube channels use such “paid actors”. He merely made an insinuation that those villagers in the video were paid actors.

Soon enough, the insinuation that “many channels” use “paid actors”, while slipping in the fact that “these channels” have “many videos of Mewat”, changed to a statement of fact, sans proof. In another tweet quoted his original thread, Mohammad Zubair asserted with confidence that those individuals who gave their testimony on camera were “paid actors”. The out-on-bail dog-whistler claimed that this ‘distressed him’.

It is important to understand here that there is absolutely no proof that these witnesses who spoke on camera were paid actors. If they were, the YouTube channel owners would end up spending precious years of their lives in jail, personally, however, I don’t believe they were paid actors. I believe these were common locals who were speculating about what the Islamists may have done in such a situation, given their history and how they conduct themselves when they unleash violence against Hindus historically.

Mewat is a Muslim majority area and the Islamisation of the region has been an open secret for several decades. Here are some of the cases from past years which gives one a peak into the extent of Islamisation and crimes committed against Hindus.

  • In 2017, Mewat Model School of Haryana came under the spotlight after allegations of forced conversions by the school surfaced. It was alleged that Hindu students were hustled into embracing Islam and offering namaz. Refusing to adopt Islam invited beatings from the teachers. After the matter came to light, the District Magistrate swung into action and suspended the teacher Moinuddin and warden Arif. One other teacher accused in the case was transferred. A victim student recounted how students were slapped in the hostel for holding up against accepting Islam.
  • In the year 2018, a 16-year-old girl committed suicide in Nuh area of Mewat region. Investigations then revealed that before this suicide, 8 boys abducted and raped her a few days ago. After committing such disgusting misdeeds, he left her outside his house in a blood-soaked condition. The investigation also revealed that the accused belonged to an influential family in the village. Those who started pressuring the victim’s family to withdraw the case as soon as the rape complaint was filed.
  • A year later, in 2018, there was a report of a deadly attack on a Dalit family from the village of Mohalka, Nagina block of Mewat. In the investigation of the matter, it was revealed that a man named Islam had been pressurising the family of Kishan living in the village to shun their religion and accept Islam. But when Kishan’s family resolutely denied converting, Islam, Taufiq, Mosim, Atru, and Asmeena attacked his family with batons and rods and humiliated them with casteist slurs.
  • A few years back, there was a case of forcible conversion, rape and abduction of a Dalit girl in Mewat. A woman named Farzana met the girl at the station after the Dalit girl left her house following a bitter quarrel with the family members. Farzana allegedly took the girl with her and gave her a new identity. The Dalit girl was purportedly fed beef and was forced to offer namaz. Farzana had later tried to sell the girl to a 70-year-old man named Islam for Rs 40,000. However, fortunately, the matter somehow reached the police and the victim was rescued. 
  • In another shocking incident from 2018, a minor girl was reported to have been raped in Haryana’s Mewat. According to media reports, the incident took place in Nuh’s Bhandka, in which the police arrested one Aslam for barging into the house of a 14-year-old girl and raping her. Aslam, along with two other men had entered the victim’s house and gang-raped her. The child’s father told that his daughter was sleeping in the home when Aslam and two other boys came and raped her. When the father of the girl came into the house, he saw Aslam raping her. Aslam was caught but the remaining two somehow escaped.
  • An issue of Love Jihad had come to the fore in 2019 when a girl was abducted by Muslim youths- Akil Khan and Rashid in the name of Jihad. The girl was reportedly hexed before being forcibly converted. The incident stirred a state-wide outrage and communal tensions in the region flared as protesters took to the streets and blocked the Gurugram Alwar National Highway for 11 hours.
  • In February 2020, a gang-rape incident with a married woman was reported in a village in Tawadu, Mewat. After the woman somehow broke out of her captivity, she accused five men of kidnapping and gang-raping her for months. The woman alleged that while she was held captive, she was administered with drugs by her captors and gang-raped. She also alleged that her kidnappers shot pornographic videos and threatened her of releasing them on the internet. 
  • Not just women and girls but even animals were not spared from the wrath of some warped individuals in Mewat. Some time ago a case of rape of a goat had surfaced. This horrific crime was carried out in the village of Marodha in Mewat on the land of Haryana. Following the investigation, one Jafar Khan and Sahukar Khan were arrested in the case while there were a total of 8 people who had allegedly raped the goat.

The local Hindus are those who have witnessed the atrocities against Hindus by the Muslims of Mewat – year after year. When mass violence like the recent Nuh violence breaks out and Hindus come under severe, fatal attack by a Muslim mob, is one to imagine that it would take paid actors to speculate the atrocities that Islamists are capable of inflicting against Hindu women? It is truly beyond the realm of one’s imagination that the local Hindus would truly and whole heartedly believe that their women were wronged? Do we believe, given the history of jihadi attacks, that they would maintain a ‘code of conduct’ where they would honour Hindu women and attack only the men?

I, for one, have no trepidation in believing that those men and women were local Hindus who feared that after murdering Hindu devotees, raining stones and bullets at them, lynching them, slitting their throats and holding women and children hostage in a Temple where they rained bullets, they would have also sexually assaulted the Hindu women.

In fact, let us not forget that a Hindu women who was stuck in the Temple when the Islamists were hammering the temple with bullets and stones categorically said that the women feared mass sexual assault by the Islamists.

“Hindu brothers were outside when shots were fired from the surrounding bushes. Power was turned out by the electrical department. They were waiting for the sun to set and for the night to fall in order to harass Hindu women sexually. Only we know how we preserved our honour. We have witnessed the deaths of our brethren. We know how our brothers were shot.” The woman broke down multiple times while recounting the horrors of the fateful occurrence.

She further continued, “We didn’t even have bandages to cover their wounds and hence, tied our stoles on them. Did we travel there to die? Can’t we offer darshan there? These people also take out their processions. Do any of us object to them? We lacked even access to water. We wet our throats with the water that was poured on the shivling.”

The woman devotee categorically said that the Islamists wanted to ensure that the women and children are held hostage in the temple overnight so they could sexually assault them, at least, that was her fear. Their strategy of trying to trap them overnight was also recounted by a male devotee who was in Nuh when the violence was unleashed. This was during an interview I had conducted personally.

I don’t blame the locals for speculating and truly believing that women were wronged because the Islamists are completely capable of raping women as they did to Hindus and Yazidis, and the ISIS toilet cleaners like Zubair are fully capable of whitewashing those monstrosities because that is what their job description is.

The ISIS toilet cleaners who are using this speculation by the locals to cry “fake news” are the same ones who are capable of calling every atrocity by the Islamists “fake news” because when Hindus talk about the onslaught they face on a regular basis, they believe it disturbs communal harmony – because talking about Islamist atrocities will tick off the Islamists yet again to unleash violence yet again and subjugate Hindus yet again. One has to remember that it was these ISIS toilet cleaners who de-platformed Yazidi women because their narrating their ordeal would bolster the mythical trope of Islamophobia. If the educated Yazidi women were de-platformed, one cannot fathom the raw deal the uneducated Hindu women of Nuh would get from them.

Before we proceed, though, I would like to explain my usage of the phrase “ISIS toilet cleaners”. ‘Toilet cleaners’ refers to those Indians who had fled to Iraq/Syria to join the Caliphate but were deemed worthy of only cleaning toilets by the Islamists. It also refers to their intellectual defenders in India, who would go to any extent to defend their violent tendencies and it certainly doesn’t stand for janitors and others, who make an honest living. It is essentially a way to talk about those who are the intellectual counterparts of elements like Areeb Majeed. Majeed was an Islamist arrested by NIA after he had fled India to join ISIS. Upon his arrest, he told the NIA that he had been tasked with cleaning toilets for ISIS. One would imagine that if a parallel was drawn, the intellectuals and media persons trying to shield Islamists are doing exactly the job that Majeed did – clean up the Islamist terrorists’ faeces.

So what was the purpose? Why did Islamists like Mohammad Zubair go hammer and tongs demanding FIRs and casting aspersions

On 31st July, unbridled violence was unleashed against Hindu devotees, participating in a Jalabhishek Shobha Yatra organised by VHP in Nuh of Mewat, Haryana. A Muslim mob went on a rampage pelting stones, shooting and murdering Hindu devotees in a pre-planned assault against Hindu devotees. An example of the brutality unleashed was what happened to Abhishek, a Hindu devotee who was first shot by the Muslim mob, then, his throat was slit open and as if that was not enough, the mob next crushed his head with a large stone. 

After the one-sided unbridled violence, the usual suspects – Islamists and Leftists – started their attempt to shield Islamists by first claiming that it was the Hindus who “provoked” violence and when that trope fell flat, claiming that it was the Hindus who initiated the violence. 

Their first assertion was that it was the “presence” of Monu Manesar in the Shobha Yatra that provoked violence. When it was proved that Monu Manesar was not present at the procession, they changed their tune to claim that it was a video released by Monu Manesar that provoked immediate violence. After that, when proof started emerging of the violence being a pre-planned campaign, the narrative shifted to claiming that it was the Hindus who initiated the violence and that no violence was perpetrated by the Muslim mob at all.

It was, again, Mohammad Zubair who was at the forefront of this. He shared a video of a man in a white shirt shooting towards the mountains from the inside of the temple, where over 2,000 Hindus were held hostage. Zubair used that video to claim that it was the Hindus who were shooting, not the Muslims, and therefore, it was the Hindus who started the violence. He even shared a tweet where it was claimed that unless there was a video of Muslims shooting at Hindus, it would not be considered true, all the while, ignoring the several videos that had emerged proving the Islamic barbarity against Hindus. The man shooting was a VHP leader and he confirmed that he was carrying a licensed weapon and was shooting in the air for the purpose of self-defence. This version was confirmed by ADGP Mamata Singh who spoke about how the Muslim mob was attacking the temple where Hindus were trapped. She was speaking from authority since she was inside the temple and had rescued the Hindus along with her team.

The recent onslaught by the Islamists and their Leftist ecosystem is only an extension of the campaign to blame Hindus for the violence unleashed against them by the Islamists. When Zubair claims authoritatively that the locals were paid actors, he does not need proof. He only needs a handful of faithful like Ravish Kumar to pick up that narrative and run with it so in the realm of the media, the narrative that it was the Hindus responsible for their own persecution is seeded further.

The purpose of going hammer and tongs, casting aspersions and calling the local testimonies “propaganda against Muslims” is not because the Islamists believe that the allegations of rape and molestation would hurt their piety. It is because if one claim is denied by the police, they can use that to make enough noise so people start doubting all the authentic information published about how the Muslim mob attacked Hindus in Nuh. Once that seed of doubt is planted, the people would be far more willing to accept that Muslims are innocent and only the victims of vicious propaganda. The truth be damned. Reality be damned. Victims, dead bodies and the lives ruined be damned.

The ultimate aim of ISIS toilet cleaners is simple – shield the Islamists, prove that it is the victims’ fault, prove that the Islamists are the real victims and that, any evidence of unbridled violence by the Muslim mob is a figment of the “right-wing” Hindu imagination.

So were women raped or molested during the Nuh violence?

The Mahant of the Temple who is an eyewitness of the onslaught and the VHP functionary have both, in essence, ruled out that women were raped and abducted. However, it is pertinent to note that even ADGP Mamata Singh said that they had received no complaints of rapes and molestation and therefore, the incidents had not happened.

Hypothetically, just because there are no complaints and FIRs, does not mean that the crime did not happen at all. I am, forever hopeful, that the police would investigate all angles despite the hollow shrieks of ISIS toilet cleaners since these are locals expressing their fears – fears that deserve to be looked into.

For most women, it is not easy to file complaints of rape and molestation. We live in a society where the stigma of molestation scars the victim far more than the perpetrator, especially when Islamist vultures are, forever ready, to whitewash claims based on the religion of the perpetrator. Let us assume a Hindu woman, trapped in the Islamist violence in Nuh, was grabbed, groped and pulled by Islamists indulging in violence. Does one believe that she would go file a complaint with the police or would she much rather forget the incident ever happened, be happy to be rescued and back home with her family safe? How many women actually complain to the police when they are molested – even the educated, empowered ones? Isn’t that what the MeToo movement was about – saying that a woman’s version of her dignity being attacked must be believed even years later because society must understand that the responsibility of her feeling confident enough to file a complaint is on them? Why then must the rules change for the poor, helpless women of Nuh?

It is rather sinister of the likes of Mohammad Zubair to discredit the legitimate fears of the locals and in order to do so, call them “paid actors”. Perhaps he views the world from his own lens, where a few lakhs a month are sufficient for him to paint targets on innocent Hindus’ backs, leading to even beheadings like that of Kanhaiya Lal. Maybe, he believes that for poor Hindu locals of Nuh, it is as easy as it is for him to compromise on their dignity and throw innocent women under the bus. It is sinister because his first instinct was to say women were not molested despite claims by locals and he did so not because he had proof, but because these were Hindu women potentially wronged by Muslim rioters – rioters who must be shielded.

I tweeted that I personally believe there is more than meets the eye in Nuh. I said so because I have seen patterns emerge every time Islamists subjugate Hindus. During the Bengal violence, there were many women who simply did not want their horrors told because they wanted to preserve the dignity they had left and not be victimised all over again by an apathetic system. During the Delhi anti-Hindu riots, there were locals from the Chand Bagh area who said that the rioters stripped their daughters and sent them back home naked. There were no complaints to this effect. Those women simply wanted to put their life back together and move on. They were scared that they would be victimised again, not only by an unsympathetic system but also by their Muslim neighbours who victimised them in the first place. The pattern is repeated, over and over again, and ISIS toilet cleaners have whitewashed these atrocities – over and over again.

I still believe there is more than meets the eye in Nuh, and I will do everything in my power to unearth what really happened on the 31st of July and the stories that Islamists want buried. The OpIndia Hindi report did not go temporarily missing because we are taking a step back from the reportage, but because the Hindi Editor was trying to get in touch with the YouTube channels that published the initial ground report, pending which, the article was made unavailable, only to be back again after we spoke to the Mahant and the VHP functionaries.

That I believe there is more than meets the eye will drive us to work harder, but does not impact how we treat facts that are recounted to us. Personally, I fully trust Islamists to indulge in unspeakable atrocities against Kafir, especially Kafir women. Liberals should truly be the last ones to lecture considering they peddle imaginary tales of Muslim victimhood almost on a regular basis. This is the big-brain victim story that Arfa Khanum Sherwani of TheWire is peddling now – hailed and believed by Islamists and Liberals alike.

Outlandish claims backed with zero evidence are what drive their ecosystem. This asininity will be believed just as mythical stories of Muslims being beaten up to chant Jai Shree Ram were believed. While most of those stories turned out to be patently fake, the ecosystem and their media partners refused to retract those stories or apologise – instead – they doubled down and dehumanised Hindus further.

I, for one, will continue to believe Hindu victims and investigate despite the squawking of ISIS toilet cleaners and claims that the entire world is conspiring against innocent rioters. There is one conspiracy afoot here – to claim that Muslims are facing genocide in India while they stock stones and petrol bombs on their rooftops to attack Hindus and their religious processions at will.