In future bail applications, defence counsel will refer to Justice Nagarathna's statements. They will suggest that the statute need to be reviewed because even the Supreme Court has questioned the validity of the January order.
A careful examination of the data, court decisions, and background information points to a story more in line with legal accountability than pure unfairness, despite their collective narrative portraying Imam as a victim of a vengeful system.
The Supreme Court is hearing the bail petitions of Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and others in Delhi anti-Hindu riots, with state argument that it was a regime change operation
The 2020 Delhi anti-Hindu riots accused Sharjeel Imam has withdrawn his application before the Karkardooma court seeking interim bail on Tuesday (14th October). Imam had...
Former SIMI operative and father of Umar Khalid spreads propaganda while admitting Kapil Sibal was trying to fix SC bench, plays victim to exonerate son
While Rajdeep Sardesai does not deny that Khalid's lawyer has been seeking adjournments, he goes on to justify their delaying tactics and forum shopping, which were seen through by the High Court during his bail hearing.