Allahabad High Court

The CJI then pointed out that there was no occasion for an officer from the Allahabad High Court to demand an explanation from railways for ‘His Lordship’s’ perusal. 

The letter further stated that the incident “caused great inconvenience and displeasure to his Lordship. In this regard, the Honourable Judge wishes that explanation may be called from the erring officials of the Railways, the GRP personnel and the pantry car manager.”

So far nine cases have been filed in Mathura court in the case of Krishna Janmabhoomi and Shahi Idgah Masjid.

The Allahabad High Court has ordered the central government to establish a committee to provide its opinions on the film Adipurush

Suppose the filmmakers make even a short documentary on the Quran, depicting wrong things, then you will see what will happen.

Adipurush has been receiving strong criticism from the audience over its crass dialogues, and cheap VFX.

Allahabad HC came down heavily on the makers of Adipurush, who have already been drawing harsh criticism from all quarters for its boorish dialogues and blatant mockery of Ramayana

The court also allowed the application of the petitioners to implead dialogue writer Manoj Muntashir as a party respondent in the case and ordered a notice be sent to him.

Highlighting that sexual relations before marriage is haram in islam, Allahabad High Court declined protection to interfaith live-in couple.

The case was reported under Sections 505(2)/295 (A) of the Indian Penal Code and 67 of the Information Technology Act. The lower court had determined that there was a solid case against the defendant at first glance.