HomeNews ReportsAllahabad High Court directs makers of 'Adipurush' to appear before it on July 27,...

Allahabad High Court directs makers of ‘Adipurush’ to appear before it on July 27, asks govt to form a committee to provide opinions

A vacation bench comprising Justice Rajesh Singh Chauhan and Justice Shree Prakash Singh was hearing separate petitions of Kuldeep Tiwari and Naveen Dhawan seeking a ban on the movie.

The Allahabad High Court has ordered the central government to establish a committee to provide its opinions on the film Adipurush, and the producers of the contentious movie to appear before it on July 27.

Separate petitions from two persons Kuldeep Tiwari and Naveen Dhawan asking for the movie to be banned were being heard by a vacation bench made up of Justice Rajesh Singh Chauhan and Justice Shree Prakash Singh.

The director Om Raut, the producer Bhushan Kumar, and the dialogue writer Manoj Muntashir have been directed by the court to appear before it on July 27.

The court has also instructed the government to form a five-member committee to assess if the movie offended the public’s sensibilities. It also instructed the government to examine its certification decision for the film in a separate order.

The order was posted late on Friday to the high court’s website.

The bench has ordered the secretary of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting and the chairman of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to submit personal affidavits informing it of the extent to which the standards for approving the film for the public exhibition have been adhered to in letter and spirit.

According to the court, any Class-1 officer of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting who is not below the rank of deputy secretary and any accountable officer of the CBFC would appear in person with records if the required affidavits are not submitted by the next deadline.

It has also instructed the director, producer, and dialogue writer to submit their individual affidavits verifying their legitimacy by the following day.

Before receiving their affidavit-based answer, the court stated it would refrain from making any interim orders or taking any other coercive measures against them.

The case was previously heard on June 28.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

The Great Nicobar Project is something China would never want. Why are Rahul Gandhi and his mother opposing it so strongly? India’s geopolitical trump...

If anyone requires a practical demonstration of what it means to sit beside a critical strait and have the power to threaten, facilitate and weaponise global trade, Iran has been providing it since February 2026.

How India is countering China one move at a time: Military power, border infra, Taiwan links, and Japan alignment

India’s response is not designed to produce immediate results, but to build long-term advantage. Whether through strengthening border infrastructure, reducing economic dependence, or expanding regional partnerships, the approach reflects a shift toward continuous competition rather than episodic reaction.
- Advertisement -