Timing suggests that, before the petitioner, an apparent bid to influence the Supreme Court's decision on CEC Gyanesh Kumar and SIR was made by former apex court judge Rohinton Nariman and sitting judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan at non-judicial forums. In addition to Nariman and Bhuyan, ex-judge Madan Loku joined a private body-constituted inquiry commission on SIR, apparently to run parallel judiciary on ideologically significant issues.
Former Supreme Court judge Rohinton Nariman and sitting judge Ujjal Bhuyan have in their separate speeches delivered recently cast aspersions on the integrity of the Election Commission and alleged pro-BJP conspiracy in the SIR exercise, even as facts do not corroborate their claims.
“Whether with divine or bovine intervention or any other kind of intervention, if a judge delivers a judgment, he is violating his oath to the Constitution," said Justice
J Sai Deepak added that contrary to Nariman’s assertion, the Supreme Court did not stop short in identifying the existence of a temple but only on who was responsible for the destruction of the temple.
The same left-liberal cabal crying foul over Justice Yadav’s remarks lauded former Supreme Court judge Rohinton Nariman for his sharp critique of the 2019 Ayodhya verdict, delivered just days before the VHP event.