HomeNews ReportsSupreme Court Adjourns Hearing on PIL against Rafale Fighter Jet

Supreme Court Adjourns Hearing on PIL against Rafale Fighter Jet

Supreme Court on Tuesday adjourned hearing on a PIL which is seeking a stay on the Rafale jet deal between Indian and France. The petition has been filed by advocate ML Sharma, who is known for regularly filing PILs in various cases, many of them frivolous and rejected by the apex court. A bench comprising Justices Ranjan Gogoi, Navin Sinha and K M Joseph adjourned the case till October 10.

Petitioner advocate ML Sharma told the court that he wants to file some additional documents related to the case and therefore he had requested that the matter is adjourned.

“You yourself circulated a letter seeking adjournment on the ground of ill health. Now you are saying that you want to file additional documents. We are simply adjourning the matter to October 10,” the bench hearing the matter said.

In the petition, Sharma alleges that the deal between India and France for the Rafale fighter jets is involved in corruption and he has also alleged that the cancellation of the older tender suggests a conspiracy. The petitioner has asked for an inquiry by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) monitored by the Supreme Court. The petitioner has also requested to cancel the agreement until the completion of an investigation by the SIT.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Jindal Global Law School ‘professor’ who called J&K ‘Indian occupied Kashmir’ sent to advise the JPC on constitutional bills concerning Kashmir: Details

Jindal Global Law School has sent a professor who once described Jammu and Kashmir as “India-occupied-Kashmir” to advise the JPC on legislation concerning Jammu and Kashmir, raising serious questions about institutional due diligence and credibility.

Why Chandrashekhar Azad chose September 24 for his Reservation protest: The Poona Pact, Ambedkar’s separate electorate demand and the Delhi Police permission row

The protest date coincides with the anniversary of the Poona Pact, which replaced the separate-electorate proposal for the Depressed Classes with reserved seats under a joint electorate.
- Advertisement -