Monday, July 13, 2020
Home Opinions Read details of the bizarre Tripura High Court judgement banning animal sacrifice at Shakti...

Read details of the bizarre Tripura High Court judgement banning animal sacrifice at Shakti temples in Tripura

The Tripura High Court judgment is a perfect demonstration of the urgent necessity of judicial reforms. There's also a great need for constitutional amendments to ensure that Hindu traditions aren't violated.

Also Read

K Bhattacharjee
Black Coffee Enthusiast. Post Graduate in Psychology. Bengali.

In the last week of September, the Tripura High Court in an atrocious judgment banned Pashubali (animal sacrifice) at the Maa Tripureswari Mandir in Udaipur and other Hindu temples in Tripura. Tripureswari temple, also known as Tripura Sundari Temple, is one of the 51 Shaktipeeths, and Pashubali is an integral custom of the temple. Kamaleswari Kali temple, located beside the India-Bangladesh border in Kasba village in west Tripura, is another important temple in the state where Pasbhubali is performed.

Tripura government has decided to file a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in Supreme Court against the High Court order. Royal scion and former Pradesh Congress president Pradyot Kishore Deb Burman has also announced that he will move Supreme Court against the Tripura High Court judgement banning animal sacrifice in the temples in the state.

It is a good time, perhaps, to look into the judgment in greater detail. The ridiculousness of the verdict is only matched by its utter preposterousness. The judges displayed a remarkable lack of awareness about the cultural sensitivities of Hindus and it was pretty clear that they were under the assumption that they have been awarded the mantle of reforming the Hindu faith.

In its judgment, the court asks the questions, “Which religion or community mandates infliction of unnecessary pain or suffering on an animal? Which religion prescribes that physical or mental pain or suffering should not be eliminated in the pre-slaughter stage? Which religion would want its followers not to treat animal with compassion, care or a humane approach?”

There is a necessity to address these questions one by one. With regard to the first question, the term ‘unnecessary’ is entirely subjective. Moreover, the courts have demonstrated time and again that it’s only one particular religion that they dare reform and that religion happens to be Hinduism. Rationality has no bearings in the domain of faith and religion. The question itself is moot.

And anyway, the Court has no right to decide what’s necessary and what’s not when it comes to matters of religious faith. As for cruelty, the extent to which Pashubali inflicts cruelty on animals is not even remotely comparable to the monstrous cruelty that is inflicted on them during industrial farming for meat. If anyone is serious about stopping animal cruelty, they should first stop the industrial farming of animals.

Banning Pashubali to stop animal cruelty while animals are still slaughtered for food and reared on an industrial scale is like a deluded moron feeling good about himself for contributing towards environmental protection by putting out a candle in his home while there’s a raging wildfire out there.

The desire to ban Pashubali has absolutely nothing to do with stopping cruelty towards animals at all. If it were, people would first ban animal slaughter for food before going anywhere near Pashubali. Here we have certain individuals who just want to feel good about themselves by targeting the meek.

As for the second and third questions, there is Halal slaughter, a certified Islamic manner of killing that involves torturing an animal to death. And yet, the Court dare not speak a word on that. The reasons for it are, of course, obvious.

Kamaleswari Kali Mandir in Tripura

The Tripura High Court then proceeds to ask, “Which religion would allow itself to be shackled to dogma, superstition and unfounded beliefs so as not to reform and be in tune with the changing times in pursuit of Constitutional goals and morality.” This question comes across as a joke. ‘Constitutional goals and morality’ is a cringe-worthy term invented by the Judiciary to grab the powers of the executive & legislature and indulge in judicial overreach under the garb of constitutional mandate.

Constitutional morality is a farce invented by judges to excede their mandate. The constitution is nothing more than a legal contract between the state and its citizens. If the concept of ‘constitutional morality’ weren’t farcical enough, the Tripura High Court has gone a step further to include ‘constitutional goals’ to it to make it even more ridiculous.

Union Law Minister Ravishankar Prasad had once remarked, “We hear about Constitutional morality, we appreciate innovations but nuances of Constitutional morality should be outlined with clarity and should not differ from judge to judge and there must be a consensus.” The statement highlights the subjectivity of the term and how it was entirely invented by the most opaque arm of the state, that is, the Judiciary.

As for the first part of the Court’s question, I would like to quote BJP MP Meenakshi Lekhi’s words which were spoken in the context of the Sabarimala verdict but stands just as true here, “It’s not the Court’s business!” Paraphrasing her words, “Will the Court decide how the birth of Jesus took place? Will the Court decide which body should be buried and which should be burnt?”

The judgment has even more ridiculous gems to offer, “Any customs, usages and traditions contrary to the constitutional spirit, cannot be a source of law.” It says further, “In our considered view, sacrifice of an animal, based on superstition or not being an essential part of practice of religion in a temple is absolutely an antithesis to compassion.” To all of this, I again quote Meenakshi Lekhi’s words, “It’s not the Court’s business!”

If we go by the logic of what is essential and what is not in a religion, almost all religious rituals and traditions will be deemed to be not essential. Religious rituals are matters of belief and tradition, they can’t be judged on the basis of necessity, as each and every ritual can be termed as superstition.

That the Judiciary has taken upon itself the mantle of reforming Hinduism is quite evident from the manner in which they express their desire for ‘social transformation’. The judgment says, “Every individual is duty bound to adopt a rational and logical thinking and not to be carried away by superfluous religious dogmas.” It adds, “Progressive society cannot be achieved when one is confined to religious dogmas. Also one has to adopt measures to inculcate scientific temper in a society ridden with superstitions.”

Tripura High Court order banning animal sacrifice

If all of this was not bad enough, it descends into the realm of the utterly bizarre pretty soon. The judges decided to pontificate on the possible negative impact on children who witness Pashubali. They did so without citing any authentic peer-reviewed research that showed the possible negative impact of witnessing such events on children and the impact it might have had in the future. The judges just assumed that it has negative impact on children, without citing any evidence. For all their supposed allegiance to ‘scientific temper’, this is remarkable demagoguery.

The judgment of the Tripura High Court said, “A child witnessing continuous violence towards animals may fail to inculcate moral values of showing an act of love, kindness and compassion towards animals.” It adds, “Sacrifice of animals in temples is not pleasing to the eyes and this inhuman religious practice in the name of religion has a definite impact on the psyche of a child.” I repeat, there’s not a shred of evidence for any of this. It’s entirely the musings and personal opinions of the judges themselves. Also, what is pleasing to eyes and what is not is an extremely subjective and personal matter, it is a wonder how judgements can be delivered on this basis.

The tradition of Pashubali has been going on for centuries, practised by generation after generation. It is particularly amusing because the practice is hugely widespread among the Bengali community, which is often lauded for being greatly progressive. Quite clearly, Pashubali hasn’t stopped Bengali children from growing up to be Progressives, which is, of course, changing quite fast these days.

The judgment is also remarkably condescending about parents who participate in such rituals, giving the impression as if the judges care more about the children than their parents themselves and that the parents are not raising the children properly. It’s absolutely outrageous.

The judgment then draws an equivalence between human sacrifice and animal sacrifice. It says that since human sacrifices were stopped centuries ago, there’s no reason why animal sacrifice can’t be either. First and foremost, there is no equivalence between the two. Cannibalism is not accepted in modern society but the consumption of meat is. Killing a human being is a crime everywhere in the world, but killing a non-protected animal, especially livestock, is not a crime, but a regular activity done by people. To even compare the two is an absurdity of the highest order.

Tripura High Court order banning animal sacrifice

The judgment says, “Importance cannot be construed to be an essentiality, meeting the twin test; being core; inextricably connected with its fundamental character.” This is a subjective opinion made by the Court while indulging in judicial overreach. It also says, “Practice of sacrificing animal in most other Shakti pithas is not seen or carried out.” This is a blatant falsehood. Tarapith and Kamakhya are two revered Shakti Peethas where Pashubali is carried out to this day. There are many other temples associated with Shaktism where animal sacrifice is performed. It is astonishing that the judgement mentions a complete falsehood to justify its order.

The Tripura High Court further says, “If the substratum of the ritual of animal sacrifice is taken away, the ceremony of performance of puja cannot be said to have been defiled or the right to practice and profess religion, obstructed, hindered or diminished in any manner.” Again, this is not for the Court to decide. One gets tired of saying it over and over again but it needs to be said as many times as the Court indulges in judicial overreach.

The Court makes numerous other observations, the only legitimate response to which is Meenakshi Lekhi’s words, “It’s not the Court’s business!”

 

The Court’s monumental ignorance of the Hindu faith is displayed when it implies that the rights of the devotees who do not believe in animal sacrifice have to be protected by the Court. It’s utterly ridiculous. If people do not believe in animal sacrifice, they can either not make a sacrifice themselves or avoid the Temple entirely. Hinduism allows for the diversity of traditions to flourish. While Hindus overwhelmingly have traditionally respected the divergent practices of respective sects and sampradayas, the Courts and a paltry sum of deluded liberal Hindus are destroying Hinduism’s diversity through their callousness.

The High Court also implies that the rights of those don’t believe animal sacrifice takes precedence over the rights of those who believe in Pashubali.

All in all, the Tripura High Court judgment is a perfect demonstration of the urgent necessity of judicial reforms. There’s also a great need for constitutional amendments to ensure that Hindu traditions aren’t violated.

The Judiciary should also contemplate the implications of its frivolous conduct. There is a growing sense of disrespect for the Judiciary among the citizens of the country which is extremely inconducive for the health of a democracy. The sacrifices at the Maa Tripureswari Mandir continues unabated to this day, the judgment has been utterly ignored by every section of the population and with good reason. And unlike Sabarimala, here the state government is also against the judgement, therefore it is difficult to implement the judgement. And this is not the first time this has happened. For example, even after the Supreme Court had banned traditional animal fights, buffalo fights are continued to be organised in Assam every year, with the sensible administration looking the other way. Such judgements attacking the religious and traditional practices which are opposed by the mass only harm the reputation of the judiciary.

There’s not a single good reason why Hindus should embrace edicts on their essential religious practices from the Indian judiciary. There’s no reason why they should take the personal musings of judges seriously, especially when it’s coated under the garb of a fallacious term such as ‘Constitutional Morality’. The judges should introspect on their conduct. Otherwise, the kind of contempt of court that we are witnessing at Maa Tripureswari Mandir with the explicit consent of the Hindu population at large and implicit consent of the ruling government will become par for the course going forward. The road to anarchy is paved with ‘Constitutional Morality’.

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

K Bhattacharjee
Black Coffee Enthusiast. Post Graduate in Psychology. Bengali.

Trending now

Amid political crisis in Rajasthan Congress, news agencies and media houses publish report based on fake Twitter account of Sarah Pilot

Media houses publish report on Rajasthan Congress political crisis based on fake Twitter account of Sachin Pilot's wife Sarah Pilot

Amid Rajasthan political crisis, ‘rebel’ Sachin Pilot meets former Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia

'Rebel' Congress leader Sachin Pilot met former Congress leader and BJP politician Jyotiraditya Scindia in Delhi amid Rajasthan political crisis

Agrima Joshua apologising to Maha Vikas Aghadi alliance shows that the Woke slogan of ‘speaking truth to power’ is only an excuse to undermine...

Agrima Joshua tagged Aditya Thackeray and asserted that she was convinced that it was BJP supporters trolling her in the guise of Shiv Sena.

Kerala Gold smuggling case accused arrested in Bengaluru, opposition parties accuse Pinarayi Vijayan govt of facilitating the escape

Two key accused in Kerala gold smuggling case Swapna Suresh and Sandeep Nair arrested from Bengaluru by NIA

Aakar Patel abuses Amitabh Bachchan and Sachin Tendulkar – reasons go beyond hatred for Modi

The 'Woke' secular-liberal camp of current times is defined by its elitist arrogance and crass snobbery. 'Human rights activist' Aakar Patel is one such specimen.

The Caravan’s ‘health journalist’ is upset that BMC sanitised the Bachchans’ residence after Amitabh and Abhishek test positive for coronavirus

Health journalist Vidya Krishnan shows ignorance of health protocol for Coronavirus, objects to sanitisation of COVID-19 patient

Recently Popular

The curious case of ‘Drone Boy’ who has made 600 drones using broken mixer grinders and televisions. A fact-check

While 'drone boy' Prathap NM has claimed to have made 600 drones using e-waste, not a single photo or video of them exist

‘Drone boy’ Prathap NM makes a statement after OpIndia fact-check: Here is why his explanation makes little sense

'Drone boy' Prathap NM says he won't show his drones due to intellectual property issues, but will show certificates from unregistered events

Sachin Pilot reaches Delhi with 25 MLAs amid speculations of Rajasthan government collapse, Gehlot holds late night meetings

Ashok Gehlot claimed that the State government was stable and would continue to remain so despite all efforts to the contrary

Pakistanis are shocked that Turkish actress does not cover herself head-to-toe in real life like her role in TV show Ertugrul, slams for wearing...

Pakistani Islamists troll Turkish actress Esra Bilgiç for her modern clothing, not traditional dress like her historical role in a TV show

Stand-up comedian apologises for insulting memorial to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in Arabian sea after MNS workers vandalised studio

The stand-up 'comedian' Agrima Joshua had made scornfully derisive remarks in her video against the Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj memorial that is going to be erected in the Arabian Sea

‘Maaro, Kafiro ko Maaro’: From creating fake alibi to mobilising thousands of Muslims against Hindus, read what Tahir Hussain did in his own words

Disclosure Statement in the chargesheet which was narrated and signed by Tahir Hussain in his own words, reveal a sinister design during Delhi riots

Amid political crisis in Rajasthan Congress, news agencies and media houses publish report based on fake Twitter account of Sarah Pilot

Media houses publish report on Rajasthan Congress political crisis based on fake Twitter account of Sachin Pilot's wife Sarah Pilot

Former RSS pracharak, Hindu Samhati founder Tapan Ghosh succumbs to Coronavirus in Kolkata

Hindu right wing leader in West Bengal and Hindu Samhiti founder Tapan Ghosh dies of COVID-19 in Kolkata hospital

Raza Academy demands ban on Islamic movie ‘Muhammad: The Messenger of God’, warns of ‘law and order problems’

The Raza Academy has issued a statement demanding a ban on the 2015 movie 'Muhammad: The Messenger of God' by Majid Majidi.

Did you know that Pakistan had awarded Democratic Presidential nominee Joe Biden with ‘Hilal-i-Pakistan’

In 2008 Joe Biden and Richard Lugar were awarded 'Hilal-i-Pakistan', the second highest civilian award in Pakistan

Pope says he is pained to see the transformation of Hagia Sophia into mosque by Turkish government

Pope Francis said on Sunday that he was pained to see the transformation of Istanbul’s Hagia Sophia museum into a mosque

Jyotiraditya Scindia says Sachin Pilot is being sidelined by Congress party during ongoing political drama in Rajasthan

Jyotiraditya Scindia has issued a statement over the political drama unfolding in Rajasthan.

Fact-Check: Is the West Bengal government recruiting only Muslims in its latest recruitment drive?

The WhatsApp message claims that only Muslims have been employed by the West Bengal government for a particular post.

Amid Rajasthan political crisis, ‘rebel’ Sachin Pilot meets former Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia

'Rebel' Congress leader Sachin Pilot met former Congress leader and BJP politician Jyotiraditya Scindia in Delhi amid Rajasthan political crisis

Agrima Joshua apologising to Maha Vikas Aghadi alliance shows that the Woke slogan of ‘speaking truth to power’ is only an excuse to undermine...

Agrima Joshua tagged Aditya Thackeray and asserted that she was convinced that it was BJP supporters trolling her in the guise of Shiv Sena.

Hema Malini refutes rumours that she is admitted in hospital for breathing problem

After rumours spread on social media the Hema Malini is in hospital for breathing problem, Hema and daugher Esha deny the rumours

Connect with us

235,824FansLike
405,391FollowersFollow
273,000SubscribersSubscribe