Thursday, July 29, 2021
HomeNews ReportsWe should have imposed President's rule and protected Babri Masjid, says Madhav Godbole, Union...

We should have imposed President’s rule and protected Babri Masjid, says Madhav Godbole, Union Home Secy during Babri demolition

Labelling ex-Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi as 'second Karsevak' (someone who offers services for religious work) for ordering to open the locks of Babri Masjid in 1986, Godbole said that Rajiv Gandhi was 'not interested' and even let the 'Shilanyas' (laying of foundation stone) take place.

Madhav Godbole, the Union Home Secretary in 1992 said on Monday said that there was a proposal to impose President’s rule and invoke Article 355 in Uttar Pradesh when the Babri Masjid was demolished and protect the mosque. By invoking Article 356, the Central government can take over state government after obtaining consent from President of India. Article 355 of the Constitution of India states that it is duty of the Union to protect every state against external or internal aggression.

Godbole was speaking about his recently published book which talks about the Ayodhya issue. He said that they had sent a proposal through which Centre, which then had Congress government led by P V Narasimha Rao, would take over the mosque and be in charge of protecting it.

Read: The History and Legacy of the Ram Janambhoomi Movement

He further blamed former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi for not having the will to find a solution.

Labelling ex-Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi as ‘second Karsevak’ (someone who offers services for religious work) for ordering to open the locks of Babri Masjid in 1986, Godbole said that Rajiv Gandhi was ‘not interested’ and even let the ‘Shilanyas’ (laying of foundation stone) take place. He said that if Rajiv Gandhi was the first Karsevak, the district magistrate under whose watch that happened, was the second Karsevak.

Godbole, whose book “The Babri Masjid – Ram Mandir Dilemma: An Acid Test for India’s Constitution” was released in August his year, is a former IAS officer and home secretary of India. He was part of the team which made a contingency plan to tackle the Ayodhya dispute. In 1993, 18 months before his retirement was due, he took voluntary retirement considering the failure of then Congress government to tackle the dispute.

The Supreme Court is expected to deliver its verdict on or before 17th November on Ram Janmabhoomi case.

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Recently Popular

- Advertisement -

 

Connect with us

255,564FansLike
563,687FollowersFollow
24,700SubscribersSubscribe