HomeNews ReportsLallantop attempts to shield Rahul Gandhi over his 'fight the Indian state' remark, falsely...

Lallantop attempts to shield Rahul Gandhi over his ‘fight the Indian state’ remark, falsely insinuates that BJP quoted the Congress leader out of context

"JP Nadda is saying that Rahul Gandhi openly talked about fighting against India. The speech was about fighting the Indian government. BJP is claiming that the Congress leader is fighting against India," Saurabh Dwivedi alleged.

On Saturday (18th January), ‘journalist‘ Saurabh Dwivedi courted controversy after he tried to shield Congress leader Rahul Gandhi against criticism.

Dwivedi, who is the Founding Editor of The Lallantop, recently conducted an interview with political analyst Rajat Sethi. He claimed that Rahul Gandhi talked about ‘fighting against the BJP, RSS and the Indian government.’

Saurabh Dwivedi alleged that the statement of the Gandhi scion was being ‘falsely’ interpreted by the BJP President JP Nadda as ‘fighting the Indian State.’

“JP Nadda is saying that Rahul Gandhi openly talked about fighting against India. The speech was about fighting the Indian government. BJP is claiming that the Congress leader is fighting against India,” the Lallantop’s founding editor was heard saying.

Saurabh Dwivedi attempted to insinuate that the BJP was deliberately quoting Rahul Gandhi out of context and attributing motives to his statement.

Political analyst Rajat Sethi was quick to correct him. He pointed out, “Saurabh ji, Rahul Gandhi did not say Indian government in his speech but the Indian state. He made the speech in English.”

“There was a slip on his part. He kept on talking against the Indian State. If there is any definition of treason, then, it is speaking against the State. This must have been a slip. But he said that his fight and war is against the Indian State,” Rajat Sethi emphasised.

“What is a State? It is the manifestation of the Indian Constitution. Even the position of the Leader of the Opposition, the one he currently occupies, is also part of the Indian State,” he further added.

Saurabh Dwivedi later conceded that Rajat Sethi was absolutely right. “Yes, Rahul Gandhi did not say Indian government but the Indian State,” he acknowledged.

The Background of the Controversy

On Tuesday (14th January), Congress leader Rahul Gandhi stirred the hornet’s nest by declaring that he was fighting the Indian State itself.

“Do not think we are fighting a fair fight. If you believe we are fighting against a political organization called BJP and RSS, they have captured almost every institution in our country. We are now fighting not just the BJP and RSS, but the Indian state itself,” he said.

Rahul Gandhi made the contentious remarks while addressing the party members on the occasion of the inauguration of the new AICC HQ in New Delhi.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Dibakar Dutta
Dibakar Duttahttps://dibakardutta.in/
Centre-Right. Political analyst. Assistant Editor @Opindia. Reach me at [email protected]

Related Articles

Trending now

Not just testing, from design to production of space hardware: Read how the Space Manufacturing Park to be set up in Ahmedabad will boost...

The Gujarat Government has announced the setting up of Common Technical Facilities (CTF) for the Space Manufacturing Park being developed at Khoraj GIDC near Ahmedabad.

BJP needs to be careful: While rebel TMC leaders can help pass important bills in Parliament, here is my word of caution as a...

TMC's rebel faction extending support to the NDA in matters of legislation, and the latter accepting the same, can be thought of as a political compromise. But in no case should TMC MLAs and MPs be incorporated into the BJP. The criminal cases against them should not be dropped. They cannot be granted political immunity. Because that would be a travesty of justice.
- Advertisement -