Home Blog Page 1856

Ex-AAP councillor Tahir Hussain granted bail in sixth case linked to anti-Hindu Delhi riots, to remain in judicial custody in other cases including UAPA

0

On Saturday, September 2, former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillor Tahir Hussain was granted bail in one of the cases (FIR 88 of 2020 registered at Dalaypur PS) filed against him pertaining to the 2020 anti-Hindu Delhi riots. However, Hussain will continue to be in judicial custody in other FIRs registered against him which include the case filed under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act for attempting to commit a large conspiracy during the anti-Hindu Delhi riots.

While granting bail, Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Pulastya Pramachala directed Hussain to pay a personal bond of Rs 1,00,000 each with one surety of the same amount. He was directed not to leave India without the court’s permission.

The FIR pertains to the brutal murder of a Hindu victim identified as Ajay Goswami Gautam. Goswami was shot on February 25, 2020, in the Khajuri Khas area during the anti-Hindu Delhi riots. Delhi Police had booked Hussain for offences of attempt to murder, rioting and criminal conspiracy under Sections 307, 120B, and 149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Muslim rioters, mainly Tanvir and Gulfam, had opened fire from the terrace of Tahir Hussain’s building on the 25th of February 2020. The firing was done against Hindus and in the process, Ajay Goswami was killed.

Notably, in July this year, Hussain was granted bail in 5 cases registered against him concerning the anti-Hindu Delhi riots. A total of 11 FIRs have been registered against the riots accused.

The Delhi’s Karkardooma Court said that the incident linked to which the first information report (FIR) was registered occurred at a time and place that was proximate to two other incidents in which Hussain was already granted bail by the Delhi HC on 12th July this year.

“In that situation, even though a bail order may not be a precedent for another case, in the aforesaid peculiar situation, bail granted to the applicant by a court higher in hierarchy to this court, does create a material change in the circumstances in favour of the applicant,” said the Court in its order on 2nd September.

The court also noticed that many witnesses are common in all the FIRs and the High Court had appreciated the merits in the previous two cases while granting bail to Hussain. “In that situation for this court, there may not be a reason to take a different view. This material change in the circumstance in itself becomes a ground to grant bail to the accused/applicant in this case as well. Hence, the application is allowed.”

Notably, in March this year, a Delhi court framed murder and conspiracy charges against Tahir Hussain for the murder of Intelligence Bureau official Ankit Sharma during the 2020 anti-Hindu Delhi riots, the ex-AAP councillor was, however, granted bail on Wednesday (July 12) by the Delhi High Court.

Role of Tahir Hussain in the Delhi Riots

OpIndia had earlier reported how Tahir Hussain confessed in a disclosure statement that he chose his house as a launchpad for the riots. Given that his house was a high-rise building and was under construction at that time, it was easy to collect stones and bricks without raising any suspicion.

While gearing up for the riots and collecting ammunition to teach Hindus a lesson, Tahir Hussain instructed his supporters to be “ready for anything and in every manner” and also ensure that all the CCTV cameras in the area were broken (so the evidence of the riots could not be captured).

Freudian slip? ‘Atheist’ Uday Stalin, who had proclaimed he is a proud Christian, reveals his real agenda behind ‘eradicate Sanatan Dharma’ comment

On 3rd September, DMK leader and Tamil Nadu minister Udhayanidhi Stalin continued to stand by his statement against Sanatan Dharma and again called for its eradication. Speaking to the media, he claimed he did not call for genocide of those who follow Sanatan Dharma (Hindus) but called to eradicate Sanatan Dharma, which, according to him, is not the same. Furthermore, he said his party’s policy is “One Clan, One God”, which is how Abrahamic religions work. For the unaware, Stalin has said in the past that he is a “proud Christian”.

In a statement to the media, he said, “I am saying again that I only criticised Sanatana Dharma and that Sanatana Dharma should be eradicated. I will say this continuously. Few are being childish, saying I was invited for genocide, while others are saying that Dravidam should be abolished. Does that mean DMKians should be killed?”

He added, “When PM Modi says ‘Congress Mukth Bharat’, does that mean congressmen should be killed? What is Sanatana? Sanatana means nothing should be changed, and all are permanent. But the Dravida model calls for change, and all should be equal. BJP is twisting my statement and spreading fake news; it’s their usual job. I am ready to face whatever cases they file against me. BJP is scared of the INDIA Alliance, and to divert that, they are saying all this/DMK’s policy is One clan, one God.”

Udhayanidhi said his party’s policy is “One Clan, One God,” which is essentially a proselytisation comment. Udhayanidhi has said in the past that he is a “proud Christian”. Christianity, which is an Abrahamic religion, is strictly against the Polytheist religion, which is Hinduism. Being against Polytheist religion, the followers of Abrahamic religions often attempt to convert those who follow Polytheist religion as an attempt to put an end to it.

Earlier, Udhayanidhi claimed his statement was only about the caste system practised in Sanatan Dharma, which is untrue. In November 2012, the Indian Institute of Dalit Studies released a paper by Sobin George titled ‘Dalit Christians in India: Discrimination, Development Deficit and the Question for Group-Specific Policies’ [PDF]. The paper cited two other papers to highlight how Christian Reddys in Andhra Pradesh and Christian Nadars in Tamil Nadu prefer to marry Hindus of their own caste rather than Dalit Christians. Furthermore, Syrian Christians in Kerala do not marry Dalit Christians. The intermarriage between Bamons and Sudras in Goa is also uncommon.

Excerpt from the paper. Source: Academia

There have been numerous calls by Dalits who converted to Christianity to give them benefits along the lines of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes of Hinduism. The so-called main reason to convert to Christianity is to get “rid of the caste baggage,” but going by the evidence, the “caste” hardly goes away after conversion.

Interestingly, in February 2023, in Tamil Nadu’s Trichy, a section of “Dalit” Christians in a village near Thiruvenrumbur alleged they faced caste discrimination at a local St Mary Magdalene Church. They were allegedly not allowed to attend the annual festival, and the church administration did not allow them to use the common community hall for holding events, including weddings.

The situation is the same in Punjab, which is one of the major hubs of conversions. Converted Dalit Christians in Punjab often face an identity crisis as they continue to avail themselves of the benefits of various schemes for Dalits.

Besides the notions that Christianity and Islam are non-discriminatory and egalitarian in nature, the very fact that he reduces Sanatan Dharma to merely caste discrimination itself shows the contempt that Stalin harbours for Hinduism. Essentially, it is evident that the comment by Stalin is not one that is aimed to fight against caste discrimination, to remedy which, several affirmative legislations have been implemented by Bharat, but one that aims to eradicate the age-old religion itself and with it, those who practise the religion – Hindus.

Udhayanidhi wants to ‘eradicate’ Sanatan Dharma

On 2nd September, the Minister for Youth Welfare and Sports Development of Tamil Nadu, Udhayanidhi Stalin, went on a tirade against Sanatan Dharma on social media.

The development came hours after he courted controversy for comparing the Hindu civilisational, religious philosophy with ‘malaria’ and ‘dengue.’ While talking to X (formerly Twitter), Udhayanidhi Stalin wrote, “Sanatan Dharma is a principle that divides people in the name of caste and religion.”

“Uprooting Sanatan Dharma is upholding humanity and human equality…I spoke on behalf of the oppressed & marginalised who suffer from the Sanatan Dharma. I spoke on behalf of the oppressed & marginalised, who suffer due to the Sanatan Dharma,” he said.

The son of Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin hailed the likes of Periyar and BR Ambedkar. He claimed that the duo conducted ‘in-depth research’ on the ‘negative impact’ of the religious philosophy on society.

“Let me reiterate the crucial aspect of my speech: I believe, like the spread of diseases like COVID-19, Dengue, and Malaria by mosquitoes, that Sanatan Dharma is responsible for many social evils,” he further emphasised.

Pakistan: Tribal woman stoned to death over allegations of adultery, tortured by husband and his 2 brothers

0

On 1st September, a tribal woman belonging to the Alkani tribe in Rajanpur district of Pakistan’s Punjab province was stoned to death after being brutally tortured for alleged adultery. As per the reports, the victim’s husband had accused her of adultery. He and his two brothers tied the victim to a tree and stoned her to death after brutally torturing her. They crushed her skull with stones and clubs, the reports said.

As per the Pakistani newspaper Dawn, the accused escaped the scene after killing her. Chucha Border Military Police has filed an FIR in the matter under Sections 302 (murder), 148 (rioting armed with a deadly weapon), 149 (unlawful assembly), and 311 (punishment for murder if act taking place to facilitate the commission of a crime) of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).

Quoting some unnamed sources, the woman in her early 20s was subjected to tribal rituals of Aus (trial by fire) and Auf (trial by water) around two years ago. She completed Aus without getting injured to prove her innocence.

The honour killing in the Punjab province of Pakistan was not an isolated incident. According to Human Rights Activists, around 1,000 women are killed yearly in the name of “honour” in Pakistan, mostly for marrying against the family’s will or having an affair. In most of the cases, close family members are accused and often even manage to escape penalties.

BCCI ruining Indian cricket? Rohan Gavaskar shuts down Pakistani troll for spreading false quotes of Sunil Gavaskar

On Monday (September 4), Rohan Gavaskar took to X (formerly Twitter) to debunk fake claims attributed to his father Sunil Gavaskar by a Hinduphobic, Pakistani troll account.

The former cricketer dismissed the fake news that Sunil Gavaskar supposedly slammed the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) for ‘politicising’ the game of cricket during an interview with NDTV.

In a tweet, Rohan Gavaskar said, “This is a completely fabricated statement attributed to my father. He hasn’t made this statement and someone is just trying to create mischief. It’s absolutely ridiculous that people would use his name to get more engagement. Please retweet so that the truth prevails”

He further added, “He (Sunil Gavaskar) is under contract with India today so he wouldn’t speak to Ndtv anyway!.” The fake news was disseminated on X (formerly Twitter) by a Pakistan-based troll account named ‘Hassan’ (@hi_hassan). He boasts of 6000 followers on the platform.

Two days earlier on Saturday (September 2), Hassan falsely claimed, “Sunil Gavaskar on NDTV: It should be a matter of utter shame for us as Indians for politicizing, ruining and basically hijacking this beautiful game of cricket. BCCI has let India down and tonight’s results are a testimony of it.”

He further added, “Sunil Gavaskar putting his retirement life on line in front of 1.2 billion mob-lynchers is highly appreciated. Hope his media contracts aren’t affected after speaking truth on national television.” Hassan also shared a screenshot, highlighting how former Pakistani Minister Fawad Chaudhry liked his tweet.

Screengrab of the tweet by Hassan

A quick glance at the profile of the troll reveals that he is based in Pakistan. “VPN speeds in Pakistan,” Hassan had tweeted on May 10 this year.

He was also seen making derogatory remarks against the Hindu community and posting objectionable cartoons, showing Hindus eating ‘sh*t’ while sporting ‘vibhuti’ and ‘bindi.’

Screengrab of the Hinduphobic tweets by Hassan

In September 2020, former ace cricketer Sunil Gavaskar was falsely accused of making sexist remarks against actress, Anushka Sharma. He was referring to a video of Virat Kohli and Anushka Sharma playing on top of their residence during the Coronavirus lockdown.

His comments were later taken out of context and presented in an unsavoury manner by vicious trolls on social media.

‘Gundaraj going on in Bihar’, says former Union Minister RCP Singh after his relative was shot at in Nalanda

0

 Former Union Minister RCP Singh’s relative was allegedly shot at in his village Dharhara in Nalanda district, police said. Singh alleged that the attacker “belongs to JD(U)”.

“Nitish Kumar doesn’t have the guts to fight politically so they’re (JD(U)) attacking my relatives and telling them that they will ruin me…Gundaraj going on in Bihar…,” Singh said.

The incident took place within the Silao police station area of Nalanda district, the police said. 

“We have received information that Pintu alias Pragati Kumar was shot at Dharhara village in Nalanda district. We have sent a police team to the hospital and another team is camping at Dharhara village,” Deputy Superintendent of Police Pradeep Kumar said.

“Investigation is underway against the identified accused,” he added.

Former Union Minister RCP Singh claimed that his “close relative” Pintu was shot at in a bid to threaten him to leave his side.

“The one who was shot at is my close relative…he keeps coming to meet me, today also he came to meet me. But after he met me, there was an attempt to kill him. He was shot at and he was told that he should leave my side or else he would be killed…he (victim) is naming a man who belongs to JD(U),” the former Union Minister told ANI.

The victim was on his way back from the Asthawan Assembly constituency meeting in Mustafapur village, Singh said. 
Pointing fingers at the JDU, the former Minister said, “JDU is completely scared after seeing our growing strength in Nalanda district. This is the reason why our relative has been shot at and targeted by JDU.” 

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

False allegations of dowry harassment or rape against husband’s family and refusal to cohabitation amount to extreme cruelty: Delhi High Court

0

In a major judgement, the Delhi High Court recently stated that making false accusations of dowry harassment or rape charges filed by a woman against the family members of her husband amounts to “extreme cruelty”, one which can’t be forgiven. The court also stated that depriving the spouse of cohabitation and a conjugal relationship is also an extreme act of cruelty,

The court stressed that cohabitation and conjugal relationship are the bedrock of any matrimonial relationship and for a couple to be deprived of each other’s company, proves that the marriage cannot survive. The court added that such deprivation of a conjugal relationship is an act of extreme cruelty.

A two-judge bench comprising Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna made these remarks while rejecting a woman’s appeal. She had challenged a family court’s order granting a divorce decree to her estranged husband based on the grounds of cruelty.

The bench said, “In the present case, indisputably parties are residing separately since 2014 which proves that they are unable to sustain a matrimonial relationship thereby depriving each other from mutual companionship and conjugal relationship. Such separation of almost nine years is an instance of utmost mental cruelty, asking for immediate severance of matrimonial relationship on grounds of cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act.” 

The bench noted that the husband also claimed that there was no consummation of marriage, and he said in the court that his wife used to resist his endeavour for sexual intercourse and was always reluctant. While the court stated that there was no evidence that the marriage was not consummated and that the man had actually taken his wife to the doctor for not having a child, there was sufficient evidence to prove that the woman was reluctant and was never forthcoming for cohabitation.

The court noted that the estranged couple barely managed to live together for about 13 months and were unable to maintain their marital relationship.

The bench observed that for a couple to be deprived of each other’s company and conjugal relationship is an extreme act of cruelty, a view which has also been endorsed by the Supreme Court. “It needs no reiteration that the bed rock of any matrimonial relationship is cohabitation and conjugal relationship. For a couple to be deprived of each other’s company, proves that the marriage cannot survive, and such deprivation of conjugal relationship is an act of extreme cruelty,” the court said.

The bench further asserted that false complaints made by the wife against her husband amounted to mental cruelty against the man, noting that the husband and his brother were acquitted in an FIR registered by the wife with rape allegations.

The High Court said, “It cannot be overlooked that making serious allegations of not only dowry harassment but of rape against the family members of the respondent (husband) which are found to be false, is an act of extreme cruelty for which there can be no condonation.” 

The High Court pointed out that the woman had filed a criminal case against her husband and brother-in-law where she made allegations of rape and cruelty. However, the trial court found both men not guilty and exonerated them of all allegations. 

The bench stated that the appellant (woman) has pursued her allegations by filing an appeal against the order of acquittal which is pending in this court. However, the bench added that even though an appeal has been preferred, this does not wash out the observations of the additional sessions judge that the allegations were manipulative and false.

The court added that significantly, it has also emerged in the evidence that the appellant had consulted the lawyer before making the complaint on which FIR was registered. 

The case pertains to a couple that got married in November 2012 but they have been living separately since February 2014. 

The estranged husband alleged that since the day of marriage, his wife failed to discharge household duties and regularly went to her parent’s home without informing him or his family members.

He further alleged that she threatened to commit suicide and falsely implicate him and his family members and she would often pick fights and physically abuse him.

On her part, the wife had claimed that she was harassed and humiliated by her mother-in-law physically and mentally and was also beaten by her husband, however, the lower court had found her allegations to be false and manipulative.

Italy did not get the expected results from the Belt and Road deal with China, says Italian Foreign Minister

0

The controversial investment deal with China under the Belt and Road Initiative has failed to meet Rome’s expectations, Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said on Saturday (2 September) ahead of embarking on a visit to China. The Italian Minister noted that trade between Italy and China has not improved as expected since Rome joined Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative four years ago. 

Speaking at an event, Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said, “We want to continue to work closely with China, but we must also analyse exports; the Belt and Road Initiative has not produced the results we were hoping for.”

Tajani further stated that Italian exports to China in 2022 were worth 16.5 billion euros ($17.8 billion), whereas the figures for France and Germany were much higher at 23 billion and 107 billion euros respectively. 

On the issue of renewing the deal, he added, “We will have to evaluate, the parliament will have to decide whether or not to renew our participation.”

It is important to note that he made this remark at the European House – Ambrosetti which is an annual international economic forum, held in Cernobbio, Northern Italy. 

Apart from dissing Chinese investment at Ambrosetti, another striking part of his remark is the strategic timing. Evidently, it came shortly before the Italian Foreign Minister left for China for a three-day diplomatic mission. 

During his trip to Beijing, the Italian Minister will meet with Chinese authorities and prepare for a planned future visit by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. According to experts, during her visit, Meloni will confirm Italy’s exit from the deal. 

In fact, she recently said that she was planning to visit China on one of her next trips abroad.

As per the official timeline, the deal is all set to expire in March 2024, and by December 2023, Italy can formally withdraw from the accord otherwise it will be extended for another five years. But Rome’s stance indicates that the renewal of this controversial deal is highly unlikely.

The Italian government has given clear indications that it may soon withdraw from the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative and this could happen by mid-October. 

A former chief economist at the Italian treasury, Lorenzo Codogno recently claimed that an ‘in principle’ agreement has already been done with the Chinese authorities regarding the withdrawal from the deal. 

In a note, he said, “The withdrawal has likely already been agreed in principle with Chinese authorities. Meloni will make the official announcement during her state visit to Beijing, expected by mid-October, as a sign of respect for China’s leadership.” 

However, he added that the Italian parliament will have the final say regarding this issue.

If taken, the withdrawal decision will be a major diplomatic jolt to China as it has been a pet project for Chinese President Xi Jinping. 

Earlier, despite strong protests from the United States, the previous Italian government in 2019 became the first major Western nation and only G7 country to join this Chinese initiative which over the years has been exposed as nothing sort of neo-colonial tool and an elaborate debt trap.

Later, Former Prime Minister Mario Draghi froze the agreement and blocked large-scale Chinese investment in sectors that were deemed of strategic importance.

Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury agreed to be part of ‘One Nation, One Election’ committee before declining to join it: Government sources

0

Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury, who declined to serve on the panel formed by the Centre to examine ‘one nation, one election’ had given his consent to be part of the committee before notification with names came out, a source in the government said on Sunday.

Notably, Chowdhury, who was named a member of the High-Level Committee (HLC) constituted by the Centre on Saturday to examine ‘one nation, one election’ has declined to serve on the panel, saying its “terms of reference have been prepared in a manner to guarantee its conclusions”.

Chowdhary on Saturday wrote to Home Minister Amit Shah refusing to be a part of the committee.

“The sudden attempt to thrust a constitutionally suspect, pragmatically non-feasible and logistically unimplementable idea on the nation, months before the general elections, raises serious concerns about the ulterior motives of the government”, the letter read.

The Union Law Ministry on Saturday named eight members to the committee, headed by former President Ram Nath Kovind, that will examine the issue of simultaneous elections to the Lok Sabha, Assemblies, municipalities and panchayats.

Apart from the Chairperson, the committee will include Home Minister Amit Shah, Chowdhury, former Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Ghulam Nabi Azad, former Finance Commission chairperson NK Singh, senior advocate Harish Salve, former Lok Sabha Secretary General Subhash C Kashyap, and former Chief Vigilance Commissioner Sanjay Kothari.

The committee has been set up months before assembly polls in five states and ahead of Lok Sabha polls next year.

Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi had informed about the constitution of the committee on Friday.

With five states going to the polls later this year and a few more to go to polls with the General Elections due in 2024 there is speculation that One Nation, One Election could become a reality very soon.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has several times pitched the idea of One Nation, One Election. In November 2020 while addressing a conference of presiding officers he said, “One nation, one election is not only a subject of debate but a necessity for India. There is an election in India every month, which hampers development. Why should the country waste so much money?”

If ‘One Nation, One Election’ does come into effect it could mean that elections for the Lok Sabha and state assemblies across India will be held simultaneously, with voting taking place at the same time.

Conducting polls simultaneously was the norm in India until 1967 and four elections were held this way. The practice stopped after some state assemblies were dissolved prematurely in 1968-69. The Lok Sabha was also, for the first time, dissolved a year ahead of schedule in 1970 and mid-term elections had been held in 1971.

The Bharatiya Janata Party had said in its 2014 election manifesto that it would seek to evolve a method of holding the elections simultaneously to both state assemblies and the Lok Sabha.

In December 2022, the Law Commission had sought the opinion of political parties, the Election Commission of India, bureaucrats and other experts on the proposal to hold simultaneous elections in the country.

However, the opposition INDIA alliance which is working on a joint alliance to oppose the BJP in the Lok Sabha polls has objected to the proposal.


(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Massive influx of Indians will not turn our beautiful country into the filth that is India: Australian real estate agent loses licence after racist email to Indian tenants

0

A real estate agent named Bronwyn Pollitt in Australia’s Perth had her licence revoked after she sent a racist email to her Indian tenants in which she contrasted the hygiene of Australians and Indians in response to a dispute over their security deposit for a rented house.

The Western Australia (WA) State Administrative Tribunal suspended her licence for eight months effective from 1 September following the two-year-old conflict. Notably, the tribunal termed her inept in holding the real estate and business agent licence.

The issue pertains to a dispute with former tenants Sandeep Kumar and Ritu Devi Sharma. After a cleaning fee was deducted from their bond in May 2021, according to the tribunal, the director of the Perth-based company Mavin Real Estate, sent the email to them. Sandeep Kumar and Ritu Devi Sharma vacated the house they had been residing at in Perth’s northern suburb of Hocking in December 2020.

After their departure, Bronwyn Pollitt conducted a final inspection of the place and notified them that the owner did not consent for the bond to be fully released. The tenants received an email from her in May 2021 that was critical of Indian culture after months of recurrent conversations about the bond and cleaning expenses.

Bronwyn Pollitt wrote, “After my discussion with Ritu about cleaning I have given thought to the cultural differences and attitudes to cleaning coming through from my Indian tenants. I and my English family have been in Australia for generations going back to the first settlement. Our living standards, our quality of life and expectations are very different to the overcrowded, overpopulated, dirty squaller (sic) of many other countries including India.”

She went on a racist tirade and wrote, “Therefore, it is impossible to have a discussion about what is clean and when I and most Australians have an expectation of what is clean and you are talking from what you are used to. I and most Australians have an expectation of what is clean and you are talking from what you are used to. There is no comparison, there cannot be any discussion as you are not used to our cultural way of living.” 

She even invoked her skin colour and dragged her Caucasian race into the issue. “I as a white Australian believe you and the others that come to Australia as you want to enjoy the lovely way of life we enjoy, clean, fresh air, jobs or if you cannot get a job social support, medical help and no overpopulation.” It is important to mention here that white people are actually invaders in Australia who have driven the aboriginal Australians, the natives of the island continent, to near extinction.

She further attacked Indians and added, “Hopefully the massive influx of Indian people will not turn our beautiful country into the filth that is India where bodies are on the street, half-burnt bodies are in the river and people climb over each other for medical help while living in absolute slums. It all starts with cleaning the rental properties though and being mindful of what you have left and knowing the same thing as India will become Perth if you make no attitude changes.”

She further said, ‘While living in absolute slums. It all starts with cleaning the rental properties though and being mindful of what you have left and knowing the same thing as India will become Perth if you make no attitude changes.’ 

According to the white Australian, a standard after-tenant cleaning fee is in the neighbourhood of $1,000. It is understood that a $200 cleaning cost was at the centre of the argument. Sandeep Kumar and Ritu Devi Sharma turned down the agent’s offer to pay the amount.

She again made a reference to her race and expressed, “And a white Australian has an expectation that they will move into a clean Australian standards clean not an Indian standard clean. Different if we moved to India then we would have to put up with the Indian standard. You have a right to your culture as do we and the cleaning of properties cannot be lowered to suit another culture. I have many diverse cultures renting and they all are expected to leave the properties fully clean.”

Bronwyn Pollitt apologises for her racist rant

A few weeks later, in June 2021, she delivered the pair another email of apologies in which she alleged that she had “never intended to be racist.” She tried to defend herself and stated, “Firstly, I apologise if you believe I have been racist against you. That was never my intent. I compared the ongoing property condition report and photos with how the property was handed back, the same as is done for every tenant. After vacating more than 6 months ago you have both been strongly vocal about the process.”

She claimed, “Each and every attempt to resolve the issues has been an argument until I realised that due to differing views which I tried to explain in my last email and are not racist, and never intended to be racist. (It was) just the result of differences in culture and different life experiences by each party meaning that the situation is seen through differing lenses.”

The tribunal noted that Bronwyn Pollitt had been under pressure at the time of the email because it went out at the height of the COVID-19 epidemic, which caused several changes to tenancy laws. She has committed to undergoing coaching and training as well as making “internal changes” to avoid a repeat of the current episode.

Real Estate Institute of Western Australia remarked, “Members not upholding the Code and the law should face disciplinary action by the appropriate authority.” Suresh Rajan, an ethnic community advocate, demanded a police investigation into the incident and labelled it one of the worst instances of overt racism he has witnessed in recent memory. He asserted that it violated the criminal code’s anti-racial vilification laws.

Amid heavy rains in Colombo, Super Four Matches of Asia Cup likely to be shifted: Report

For the past few days, Sri Lanka’s capital, Colombo has been receiving intense rainfall which has cast imminent danger over the upcoming matches of Asia Cup 2023. The India-Pakistan match was called off yesterday due to rains after India scored 266 runs by opting to bat first. To avoid wash out of the rest of the games, the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) is reportedly mulling on a contingency plan. As per a report in the Indian Express, the cricketing body is planning to shift the venue of the Super Four stage matches of the Asia Cup.  

Initially, Colombo was due to host all the Super Four matches including the final of Asia Cup 2023. But intense rainfall has compelled the organisers to shift the cricketing venue from the country’s capital, Colombo. Reportedly, these matches could likely be shifted to Pallekele and Kandy. However, even in that case, Pallekele could still pose a risk of rain. 

The Indian Express reported that the teams have been apprised of the situation in Sri Lanka’s capital and added that Pallekele and Dambulla are being looked at as alternate options to host these matches.

Pertinently, this year Asia cricketing giants are locking horns in a 50-over format and it is being hosted in a hybrid model in Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Apparently, Pakistan is hosting the event but when India refused to play in Pakistan, ACC zeroed in on Sri Lanka as the second venue. At that time, the Sri Lankan Cricket Board suggested that they could host the event in Dambulla, which is a dry region in the central part of the country.

But when both broadcasters and teams showed reluctance to travel to Dambulla, Sri Lanka chose Pallekele and Colombo for hosting these matches. However, given that it’s currently the monsoon season on the island, both of these areas have been getting intense rainfall for the last five days.

Strikingly, even the mega India-Pakistan clash yesterday (2 September) ended without a result as bad weather played spoilsports and the game got washed out. Although there is a week’s time before the first game is played in Colombo on 9 September, the bad weather forecast has raised concerns for ACC. It has forced ACC to rethink its strategy. 

Interestingly, Sri Lanka usually avoids hosting matches in September after the first week due to rainy conditions. So, if the Super 4 stages take place in Colombo, it would be at the mercy of Rain God. 

Now, with just two more matches remaining to be played in Pakistan, the ACC could likely take a final call on shifting the venue in the next 24-48 hours.