Home Blog Page 6860

‘If they think this is humour, they must stop producing any content,’ Agartala furious at AIB writer’s offensive blogpost

Vishal Dayama, the senior writer at All India Bakchod (AIB), has found himself in a fix after making a derogatory blog post about his recent trip to Agartala on his personal blog. Dayama was invited to NIT Agartala for an event recently. The blog post was published on the 16th of November but it created a furore only later following which he deleted the post from his blog.

In the post, Dayama wrote, “A few days ago, Devaiah (my colleague) and I went for a fully sponsored trip to a place, which frankly, we could’ve afforded easily. For those of you who are unaware of Agartala: no, it’s not the changed name of Aligarh, it’s, in fact, the capital city of Tripura, which if you don’t know is one of the seven northeastern states, and again not a changed name of Muslimabad.” And it only gets worse here on.

In the next paragraph, he says, “…we exchanged a second look of shock since we both didn’t know whether Agartala was a place or was it the scientific name of a rodent”. Then, he went on to write, “The guys who came to pick us up had an Omni Van because I think they wanted to reassure us that we indeed were imprisoned there for the next two days. Since it was dark, we couldn’t see much of the city (read: forest) on our way to the five-star guest house. We entered our respective rooms only to be greeted by a spider in my room and a monitor lizard in Dev’s.” He continued, “…but because of the forest and the 17th century that Agartala has been living in, lizards were unaware that their greeting might be a cultural shock for two dudes who have lived their entire lives in metro cities.”

Dayama had some insulting words for the youth of Agartala as well. He writes, “We attended the event, everything went well, people were even taking selfies with us. We both came to the conclusion that it might be because they were seeing people from the 21st century for the first time.” His insults towards Agartalites do not end there. He speaks of his visit to the Bangladesh Border, “Dhaka border was nothing like Wagah border and we left disappointed from there after clicking some selfies with the big dump of garbage which was located right at the border. Either it was a metaphor for Bangladesh or it was a metaphor for people who go and visit that border. I think it was the latter.” He continued, ” Our next stops included a wildlife sanctuary, which was being run only by monkeys, both literally and metaphorically”.

People from Agartala were not amused by the blog post. Saikat Chakraborty, one such person, confronted him on Instagram, following which he deleted the post. In the screenshots of the conversation Chakraborty posted on his Facebook account, Dayama could be seen apologising saying it was written in humour and not out of spite and that he was sad that people had gotten offended over it. He then said that he was deleting it from everywhere.

Anup Paul, a content writer from Agartala, says, “That guy lacks general knowledge. If they think this is humour, then they must stop their content.” Another student from Agartala, who wishes to remain anonymous, said, “The AIB founders are accused of molestation and icon defaming. But still, they masquerade their insult as humour intended not to hurt sentiments”. Shubham Dey, a pass-out from NIT Agartala, said he was “disgusted” after reading the post and that he did not expect something like this from the senior writer of AIB.

A resident of Agartala told OpIndia.com on condition of anonymity, “The detailed description of Agartala he gave in his post, it couldn’t be just humour. Although he says that it was made in jest and he exaggerated things for the purposes of humour, I think there was genuine malice beneath his words. His post was degrading.” Another resident shared similar sentiments. He told us, “There is a huge difference between humour and disrespect. The way Agartala has been portrayed by that article shows that it has been written just to mock Tripura and its people. The writer was invited to a prestigious college but instead of being grateful, they attempt to belittle us and the hospitality shown by the students of that institute.”

Things haven’t been going well with the AIB in recent times. AIB co-founder Tanmay Bhat admitted to knowing about an employee’s sexual transgressions and yet remained quiet. Gursimran Khamba, another co-founder, was also accused of sexual misconduct following which he was sent on a leave of absence.

Latest GDP and growth figure revision is based on robust and rigorous methodology

According to the revised GDP numbers released by the government on Wednesday, India’s economic growth under the previous Congress-led coalition government was slower than estimated earlier and was never in double digits.

The Central statistical office re-calibrated the data to establish a better picture of the economy and thus lowered the GDP growth rates for a majority of the previous 10 years of the UPA regime.

Gross Domestic Product estimates are subject to the prices of base years and these base years are periodically updated to ensure that the series reflects the structural changes that have taken place in the economy and to better capture the economic activity through such macroeconomic aggregates. It has been a practice that once the Central Statistics Office updates the base year it provides back series data for the previous years based on the latest base year prices.

Going by this practice, the NITI Aayog along with CSO released the back series for the GDP and as per this, it has been found that the average growth rate under the four years NDA 2 has been 7.35% which has been higher than the 6.7% of the 10 years of UPA-2.

As evident, this finding has led to severe politicization of the numbers while authors and commentators are yet to review the detailed methodological note that was released with the data. It is important to note that the shift to the new methodology for GDP was considered as a significant improvement over the previous methodology as our new methodology is in line with the global standards.

The fact that the back series come after 2 and a half years and this shows that clearly Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation wanted to be careful while it deployed the new methodology while computing the back-series calculations. The previous methodology only took a look at the Annual Survey of Industries data and very few firms are covered under this data set, while the new methodology covers a significantly larger proportion of firms as it uses the Ministry of Corporate Affairs dataset. Thus, the new back series considers a very large number of companies that were ordinarily left behind due to the previous methodology and this has ensured that there is a significant improvement in the estimates that we’re now obtaining as per the new series.

Similarly, another area of improvement has been in the sector-specific price indices being used as deflators. This helps to ascertain the “true” contribution and growth rate of the sector and this improves the computation significantly. It also shows that the tertiary sector does not have a disproportionate share in India’s GDP which debunks the myth that Indian Economy transformed from being agriculturally based to being service based, but it skipped the middle aspect of the “manufacturing” phase.

Under the new methodology, there is an enterprise approach instead of the establishment approach. This means that we look at the enterprise as a whole aggregate unit together, rather than look at different plants of the same firm. This is more in line with global standards. The labour input method has also been modified to reflect the dynamic changes that the global economy has undergone over the last couple of years.

All of these changes have definitely put our series in line with the global standards as we’ve ensured that the methodology tries to adequately reflect the level of economic activity in India. However, political ramifications have already begun as Opposition Parties have questioned the new methodology but they’re yet to point out so as to why they feel that the methodology is not robust. Politicization of the data is definitely incorrect but given that this new data debunks the narrative of “High-Growth” under UPA, it is bound to be severely questioned.

The new back series is indeed reliable as it gives a very accurate picture of the Indian Economy. Most economists have routinely argued that the argument of India “de-coupling” from the global economy is a myth. The new back series clearly validates this argument and it reinforces the extent of the impact that global economic growth has on India. Besides, the dip in 2008 to 3.1% followed by a subsequent increase in growth for two financial years due to the financial slowdown and subsequent slowdown of the economy from 2011 onwards shows how India’s growth has followed the boom-bust-boom phenomena or the “Real Business Cycle” Theory. This phenomenon is in line with a similar finding by many economists who’ve worked extensively on the subject.

Given that the new back series is based on a superior methodology and it paints a very accurate picture (even if in a directional sense) of the growth that India experienced from 2005 onwards, there is no doubt about the authenticity or the credibility of the computations. As a result, it would be wise to accept the data as it is rather than politicization of such an important statistic and a routine government procedure.

India opens Hockey World Cup with a 5-0 win against South Africa

0

India registered a grand win against South Africa in the opening day of Men’s Hockey World Cup 2018 which is being held in Odisha. India scored 5 goals against South Africa’s zero. It gave team India a boost of morale, that can help it in the upcoming matches and help it grab the world cup.

The first match of India was organised in Kalinga stadium at Bhubaneswar, with 15,000 frenzied spectators. Among them were hockey veterans, who led India grab first Hockey world cup in 1975. They were invited to witness this first match of India and South Africa.


India last played South Africa at the 2014 Commonwealth Games and beat them 5-2. Both the teams have since not met on the international stage. India played with aggressive tactics, evident from several raids executed in first 8 minutes, but without luck.

The first goal came from Mandeep Singh by a penalty corner, in the ninth minute. Then there was no stopping. Mandeep Singh’s goal was followed by a goal by Akashdeep Singh in the twelfth minute. In the second quarter, South Africa tried to equalise by counter-attacks, but Indian defence stood strong. The score remained 2-0, in the second quarter.

Simranjeet scored from India’s behalf in the third quarter, with help of a perfect pass from Mandeep Singh as India took a three-goal lead in the game. The fourth goal came only three minutes later, from Lalit Upadhyay, taking the score to 4-0, which was followed by Simranjeet Singh striking a goal against Africa at the end of the third quarter.

Fourth quarter witnessed South Africa going defensive against India and protecting its citadel. India tried hard, to take the score higher, but in vain. Africa defended well in the fourth quarter.

With this, the match ended with India standing at 5, and South Africa at zero.

Belgium defeated Canada in yesterday’s match also held in Kalinga stadium, held before the India vs South Africa match. Belgium scored 2 against Canada’s zero.


India and South Africa are placed in pool C of the tournament. 16 countries are participating in the World Cup, divided in 4 pools of 4 teams each. The tournament started on 28th November, and the World Champion of Men’s Hockey will be decided on 16th December when the final match takes place.

Maharashtra Assembly unanimously passes Bill for 16% reservation to Marathas

The Maharashtra Assembly on Thursday unanimously passed a Bill proposing 16 per cent reservation for Marathas under socially and educationally backward category. The bill has now gone to the Upper House.

The Bill provides for reservation of seats for admission in educational institutions and posts in public services to the Marathas who have been declared as socially and educationally backward and under-represented.


The Fadnavis government had on November 18 approved the SBCC panel’s recommendation for a 16% quota for Marathas.

The SBCC panel had suggested that looking at exceptional circumstances and extraordinary situations generated on declaring Marathas as socially and educationally backwards and their consequential entitlement to reservation benefits, the government may take appropriate decision within constitutional provision to address the emerging scenario in the state. The panel report said that Marathas have inadequate representation in services under the state and they are entitled to reservation benefits and advantages enshrined in the Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution.

Chief Minister Fadnavis had earlier hinted at the government’s decision to table the Maratha reservation bill in the state assembly. “I request all of you to prepare to celebrate on December 1,” he said while addressing a gathering in Ahmednagar.

The Maratha community, which constitutes over 30 per cent of the state’s population, has been demanding reservation in government jobs and education for a long time.

My patriotism doubted, darkest day of my life: Cricketer Mithali Raj responds to Ramesh Powar’s ‘threat’ revelation

0

The Indian women cricket veteran player, Mithali Raj responded to the teams’ coach, Ramesh Powar’s report to BCCI. Power has accused the senior player of being selfish, throwing tantrums and creating chaos.

Raj, calling this day the ‘darkest day of her life’, took to Twitter to express her anguish. The veteran cricketer wrote that she was deeply saddened and hurt by the aspersions cast on her. She furthered that her 20 years of commitment towards the game and her patriotism for the country had been questioned.


Ramesh Powar in his 10-pages report to BCCI CEO Rahul Johri and General Manager of Cricket Operations Saba Karim had accused the batswoman of “blackmailing” and “pressurising coaches”.

Raj’s reactions came after Powar in his report wrote that “Mithali Raj — a senior player in the team. Minimum inputs in team meetings, not a single word of appreciation after finishing at the top of the table. Could not understand & adapt to the team plan. Ignored her role and batted for own milestone.”

He accused Mithali of thrown tantrums regarding batting order and threatened to leave instead of being happy with the positive beginning of the World Cup. “I was saddened and baffled by her attitude. It gave me an impression that for Mithali Raj she comes first and then team India,” Powar added.

Mithali had earlier written a scathing letter to the BCCI alleging that Powar had humiliated her during the tournament in the Caribbean.

Recipient of the prestigious Arjuna Award in 2003 and Padma Shri award in 2015, Mithali Raj is the first captain to lead India to ICC ODI World Cup final twice, first in 2005 and then in 2017. Amassing a spectacular 6190 runs, she is presently the highest run-scorer in women’s ODIs.

The tussle actually began when Mithali was dropped from the playing XI for India’s semi-final against England in Antigua on November 23. Her dismissal drew a lot of criticism as the leading run-scorer in women’s cricket had been consistent throughout the group stages of the tournament wherein India remained unbeaten.

Mithali missed the final group game against Australia with a knee injury. Though her medical reports suggested she was deemed fit ahead of the crucial semi-final tie, captain Harmanpreet Kaur and the team management decided to omit her and go in with an unchanged XI.

India was eventually out of the tournament after it lost to England by eight wickets.

Former India skipper Sunil Gavaskar has come out in support of senior Indian woman cricketer Mithali Raj in the controversy surrounding her dropping from the World T20 semifinal team, saying a player of her experience should not have been left out of the crucial match.

The team management cited cricketing logic behind the move to drop Mithali but cricket legend, Gavaskar did not agree with that.

Navjot Sidhu gets more love and respect in Pakistan than in India : Union Minister Harsimrat Kaur

Union Minister Harsimrat Kaur Badal took a jibe at Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu after returning to India from Pakistan, saying that he receives more love and respect in Pakistan rather than in India. Harsimrat Kaur had visited Pakistan to attend the foundation stone laying ceremony for the Pakistan side of the Kartarpur Corridor, where Sidhu was also invited.

Harsimrat Badal’s dig at Congress leader Sidhu comes after Imran Khan showered praises on him saying that Sidhu will win even if he contests an election in Pakistan. Imran Khan had stood in support of Navjot Singh Sidhu after he was severely criticised in India for visiting Pakistan to attend the oath-taking ceremony of Imran Khan, where he had hugged Pakistan Army General Bajwa.

“He (Imran Khan) offered him (Navjot Singh Sidhu) to fight elections from Pakistan. He (Sidhu) seems to have more love and respect in Pakistan than what I noticed over here. He has some good relationships over there,” Badal said to ANI.

Navjot Singh Sidhu had also caused a severe controversy after he posed with dreaded Khalistani terrorist Gopal Singh Chawla during his controversial visit to Pakistan to inaugurate the Kartarpur corridor. Khalistani terrorist Gopal Singh Chawla was earlier spotted alongside Pakistan Army Chief Qamar Javed Bajwa at the inauguration of the Kartarpur Corridor.

Harsimrat Badal, along with Union minister Hardeep Singh Puri had officially attended the foundation laying ceremony of Kartarpur corridor in Pakistan. Pakistan had invited External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj for the event. But she said she can’t go due to other engagements, and the two union ministers represented the government of India. Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu had also been to Pakistan in his personal capacity after receiving an invite from the Pakistan government. Harsimrat Kaur Badal attending the event had said that it was an emotional and historic moment for her.

Imran Khan’s comments received strong reactions in the country as BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra said that Sidhu must get himself inducted in the Pakistan government’s Cabinet as he repeatedly professes love for the neighbouring country.

Navjot Singh Sidhu had eagerly accepted the invitation of the Pakistan government while Punjab chief minister Amarinder Singh had declined the invitation sent to him. Amarinder Singh had said that due to continued terrorist attacks in Punjab and horrific killings of Indian soldiers by Pakistan, he will not be attending the event.

No scandal in Rafale Deal, says French ambassador Zeigler in Bengaluru

0

The Ambassador of France to India, Alexandre Ziegler said on Wednesday that there was no wrongdoing associated with the Rafale deal. Citing the historical ‘cooperation’ between the two countries, he urged people to heed the facts.

Denying the existence of any scandal, Ziegler stated, “What scandal? Just look at the facts, not at the tweets, that’s my only recommendation. There is no scandal at all.”

While at a function to launch French Tech Community in Bengaluru, he said, “See the track record, see how the trust has been fostered between our two countries in the field of aeronautics. Look at the Indian government’s commitment to Make in India, which is impressive. Fifty per cent offset is very unique, look at the major procurement.”

On the allegation of HAL losing potential jobs because of the Rafale deal, Ziegler asked if HAL has raised concerns of job-loss. “Have they raised apprehensions about lost jobs? I am unaware of what potential jobs are, about four billion Euros will be invested in India. There will be room for hundreds of companies to provide employment with such a large amount,” he added.

In addition, the Ambassador also acknowledged the presence of all major French companies in Aero India, scheduled in mid-February.”I can’t tell you the number, but all our major companies will be there,” Ziegler said. Stressing on the fact that nearly all big French companies have been spending in India for decades now, he said, “we have had long historical trade relations with India.”

Ziegler also claimed that French companies didn’t wait for Make in India initiative. “We have been making in India for decades now. Technology has been transferred. All major companies like Dassault, Airbus, Thales have an enduring presence in India,” he said.

Congress has been falsely claiming that the government of forcing Dassault Aviation to choose Reliance Defence its offset partner in the Rafale deal. Rahul Gandhi has alleged that the government was aiding Anil Ambani to get a contract worth Rs 30,000 crore. However, these claims have been soundly dismissed by both the Indian and the French governments.

However, the Dassault CEO Eric Trappier had refuted the allegations levelled by the Congress party. Reliance Group has also said that Dassault’s investment in Reliance Airport Developers Limited is independent of the Rafale deal. They have accused Congress of spreading lies to gain political mileage. Anil Ambani has also filed a defamation suit against Congress leaders for lying on Rafale deal.

Priyanka Chopra to marry Nick Jonas: Is it really so difficult to not get judgemental?

0

Love has no boundaries, except when you are celebrities. Then everyone has an opinion on your choice. In 2007 when Aishwarya Rai, got married to Abhishek Bachchan, four years her junior, eyebrows were raised. Many smirked that Rai was marrying a man who was not as successful in his career as she herself has been, especially when both his parents have been legends in their own leagues. It was touted that Aishwarya was ‘settling’ for Abhishek, after having dated Salman Khan, whose name itself sort of guarantees 100 crore at the box office.

A decade has passed since then and while the world has even moved to a state where people are identifying themselves as ‘age fluid’ (a state that age is a fluid concept and you could be whatever age you want to be), it is still outrageous if a woman marries a younger man. The concept of ‘age fluidity’ is ridiculous, and denigrating a woman for marrying a man slightly younger in age is equally asinine.

Priyanka Chopra, one of the most successful actors India has had in last decade and a half, announced her engagement to American singer-songwriter Nick Jonas. While Priyanka Chopra’s fans are excited and have welcomed her for her grand wedding, she faced flak for marrying Jonas, almost ten years her junior. She was mocked on Twitter and elsewhere and called a cradle-snatcher, people called her his ‘mother’, and jokes were aplenty.

When Jonas arrived in India last week for his upcoming wedding to Chopra on 2nd December, Priyanka posted an adorable picture of the two of them, very much in love, with a caption, “welcome home baby”, people were triggered. She was ‘age-shamed’ and trolled ruthlessly.


JEEJUS was really, really upset it seems. And of course, she did it for the green card.


All because two people in love decided to let the world know how happy they are. Because the woman in this love equation is a decade older than the man. Recently, we had seen how bhajan singer Anup Jalota was ridiculed for going public with his relationship with Jasleen, many years his junior, during the Bigg Boss show. How can Jalota fall in love with a younger girl, after all, he sings bhajans. How un-sanskari of him?

Since when did we stop celebrating love? Why do we have to be so cynical? Why can’t we just be happy that two people are in love and that it is none of our business to pass judgements on them? Why can’t we just let people be?

The only scenario in which the age difference between a man and a woman should be an issue is if either of the party is minor. When both the man and the woman are adults and decide to spend the rest of their lives together, why should that be anybody elses business?

For once, let us keep our cynicism aside and just enjoy the warm, fuzzy feeling called love.

Dear Indian journalists, don’t go gaga over Kartarpur corridor, for Pakistan and Imran Khan it is a matter of survival

Religions have been instruments to heal differences and also to increase tensions in many instances. So, when Modi government gave approval for the Kartarpur corridor, many felt it was a step forward by the Indian government. This especially when terror activities continue unabated in the Kashmir region.

Many who support the government welcomed the move. However, when Pakistan planned to have its own groundbreaking ceremony for the corridor and the Modi government decided to send representatives for the event, the outrage started. The outrage was justified too. Instead of the understanding the reasons for this difference of opinion by the ardent Modi supporters, media, as usual, went about giving them names and mocking them.

Let’s get to the facts. It was not as if Congress leader Navjot Singh Siddhu came up with this brilliant idea of opening the Kartarpur corridor for the Sikh pilgrims from India during the oath-taking ceremony of Imran Khan. This has been a long pending demand by successive Indian governments. This was never heeded to by the Pakistani government and its controllers. In fact, India had long back taken the first step in granting a visa to Pakistani pilgrims to visit Ajmer Sharif. There was no policy difference on this matter between different political parties at all (political posturing is a different matter).

In fact, when he was still the Chief Minister of Gujarat, Prime Minister Modi himself had supported extending visas to Pakistani citizens who visit India to watch cricket matches to get the opportunity to visit Ajmer Sharif.

Cut to today. The headlines in various newspapers is nauseating. In fact, if you try to find the difference between Indian and Pakistani newspapers, we would be shocked to see the similarity in narratives.

Headlines are not meant just to quote statements by various leaders. They also serve as a guide to the reader about the general direction of the story. None of the above headlines is critical of Imran Khan for not mentioning anything about “terror” in Kashmir. I would guess that a section of the Indian population would have agreed with him, or even supported him if he had at least talked about his helplessness in addressing the terror activities.

The paeans being sung by the mainstream media that Imran Khan has taken a historic step is highly misplaced. This was at best a good reciprocatory step. If it is historic or not will be determined, after a period of five years at least – when all Sikh pilgrims return to India alive after their pilgrimage visiting Kartarpur. When a visiting cricket team is not spared of attacks, it would be prudent to wait and see if pilgrims are spared.

Never discount the fact that ‘Taliban Khan’ is still openly hobnobbing with the Chinese against India. Have mainstream Indian journalists forgotten Imran Khan’s tweet to Modi mocking him? How can any foreign policy expert expect India to reciprocate when he calls the Prime Minister a “small man”? In fact, it is not even about the fact that it is Modi who is the Prime Minister right now. Any head of India being mocked in this manner must not be tolerated.

However, on second thoughts, this may be precisely the reason the Lutyens based Indian journalists are enamoured by Imran as the man to stop Modi in his tracks. Imran had effectively closed all doors for resolutions after this sham tweet. The opening of the Kartarpur corridor was more of a political stunt to attract Nawaz Sharif’s base in Pakistan – who had elected Sharif the previous time on his call to resolve issues with India. Of course, along with military support, he has to get a chunk of votes to stay in power.

At best, Imran Khan is trying to get good PR going from a global perspective. Especially, in light of PM Modi’s global campaign for India, Imran Khan has realized that he needs to up his game to stand a chance.

In light of stinging attacks by Trump, especially in the recent past, Pakistan already is on the back foot. After going with begging bowl to China for funds and returning empty-handed, Imran Khan has realized that he needs to broaden support globally to attract more financial support. With this being the financial reality, Imran dare not any misadventure with India – even a small one. It is quite natural for the Pakistani media to hide this. What is really unfortunate is that Indian media playing chorus to the same tune.

A setback for Tamil Nadu government and anti-Sterlite groups, NGT panel says closure of Sterlite plant unjustified

0

In a major setback for AIADMK led Tamil Nadu government and various anti-Sterlite groups, National Green Tribunal has labelled closure of copper producing Sterlite Plant as unjustified. This temporary relief is seen as a chance to re-open the closed plant of Sterlite in Thoothukudi district, which had put at stake the livelihoods of more than 30,000 people.

Former Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court Tarun Agarwal was heading the NGT constituted the committee. The committee said that Sterlite was not given adequate time to give a response to allegations levied by the Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board. It also observed that closure of plant without serving a notice is against ‘natural justice.’

Senior advocate Aryama Sundaram, who was defending Vedanta Ltd, reportedly said after the NGT report that the closure of Sterlite plant was totally motivated by politics and result of manipulations done by TNPCB. He said that observations noted by NGT and report given, were favourable for Sterlite and it, in other words, mean re-opening of the plant.

Sterlite copper plant, owned by Vedanta ltd. operated in the district of Thoothukudi. It is estimated that the plant impacted the livelihoods of 30,000 families and 800 medium and small industries. Sterlite plant contributed 40% of the copper to overall demands in India. Reports claimed that closure of the plant would lead to an increase in import costs of copper by a staggering 2 billion USD.

After reports of a possible expansion spread, various NGOs and pressure groups accused Sterite of contaminating local environment by producing lethal gas and discharging various harmful waste. They said it leads to an increase in cancer cases, in the region. The Vedanta group has maintained that the plant was operated in strict adherence to all norms and there are no proven data of any toxic reaction.

As protestors clashed with the authorities, police firing had resulted in the deaths of 13 civilians. The protestors were opposing the Sterlite plant. This led to Tamil Nadu CM Edappadi K. Palaniswami directing the authorities to close the plant permanently.

Vedanta Ltd. immediately appealed to NGT for interim relief but failed. Hearing by the NGT was postponed till August. The NGT had organised committee meetings first in Thoothukudi than in Chennai. It had reviewed thousands of letters supporting Sterlite and pleading for its re-opening in Thoothukudi.

On October 29, NGT had organised a hearing with Vedanta Ltd. and TNPCB. Sterlite had contested claims of TNPCB and of other NGOs. Both in NGT and Madurai bench of the Madras High court, TNPCB has submitted reports of reduction in poor air quality around the plant, after plant shutdown. Sterlite said that method adopted by Board were flawed and hence incorrect.