Home Blog Page 880

Guna: Principal Catherine Vattoly of Vandana Convent School booked for snatching mic from students reciting Sanskrit verses; ABVP stages protest, files complaint

Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) members protested at Vandana Convent School in Madhya Pradesh’s Guna, after the Principal Catherine Vattoly stopped sixth-grade students from chanting Sanskrit verses during the morning assembly on 15th July. A First Information Report (FIR) was registered against her, per the authorities. The institution is one of the district’s oldest English medium schools and was founded in 1974 by the Sisters of the St. Elizabeth.

Saksham Dubey, a 26-year-old Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) activist filed the formal complaint which stated three students attempted to recite the Sanskrit shloka (verse) “Sarve Bhavantu Sukhina” on 15th July between 8 am to 9 am when Principal Catherine got upset and snatched the microphone from the students and stopped them from giving the speech.

The complaint highlighted, “Sister Catherine said all this Shayari (poetry) will not be allowed and asked the students to speak in English. The statement of Sister Catherine equating shokla to Shayari has hurt our Hindu religious sentiments. The students have to also face mental harassment. The seeds of missionary mentality were sown by Sister Catherine, which affected all the students following the Hindu religion.”

Catherine Vattoly, who was holding a microphone, addressed the demonstrators and apologised in the hope that they would leave after ABVP activists staged a protest at the school gates. “It was a day to speak in English, so the student was stopped. If anyone’s feelings were hurt, I apologise. I respect all religions,” she claimed. The agitation commenced after ABVP members read in a Hindi newspaper that the Principal took away the mic from the students and pushed them to speak in English.

On July 21, District Education Officer (DEO) Chandrashekhar Sisodia sent a show-cause notice to the institution which asked the management to clarify. The notice highlighted, “What kind of program was conducted in your school in which the children were snatched from the microphone and stopped from speaking Sanskrit verses and Hindi, and were asked to speak in English.”

It further stated, “In the above sequence, you should immediately provide your explanation along with evidence in writing to the undersigned. If the explanation is not received or is not found satisfactory, a proposal for disciplinary action against the school as per rules will be sent to the competent authority.”

The administration of the school alleged that selected pupils usually deliver presentations in Hindi and English during morning assembly. Speeches that day were expected to be given in English as per the school, but the students started speaking in Hindi. He was requested to speak in English by the teacher. Everyday prayers include the recitation of several religious quotes.

The demonstrators demanded that the Principal be fired and that the Sanskrit verse that the youngster had been prevented from uttering be incorporated into the school’s daily prayers. They also wanted an FIR against the school administration. It took around two hours for the protest to end. After reassurances from the school authorities, the situation subsided when the district education officer arrived.

“I also come from an English medium school. It is a global language and in South Indian states this is the language that is used. I also speak in English. We did not have an issue with the language. The school Principal is denying freedom to these children. We wanted to bring these anti-national practices to the administration’s notice,” said ABVP district convener Piyush Mishra.

“After the uproar and protest by the student organisation, the police took cognisance of the matter and registered an FIR against the school Principal. The matter is being investigated,” informed Guna Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP) Mansingh Thakur. The official complaint was filed under sections 299 (Deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious sentiments of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs) and 196 (Promoting animosity between different groups on grounds of religion, etc.) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). These sections provide for a maximum sentence of three years for the convicted individuals.

Uttar Pradesh: Bulldozers raze down decades old illegal flower market in Lucknow- Details

On Thursday, 25th July, the Uttar Pradesh government invoked bulldozer action demolishing the illegal flower market set up in the city of Lucknow since 2001. The land on which the flower marker was being operated belonged to Hussainabad Trust who had leased the land on 100 years lease. The state in the year 2024 canceled the lease and ordered the shopkeepers to vacate the land. However, the state administration razed off the illegal structure. As per the local reports, the flower market has now been shifted to ‘Kisan Bazaar’ in the Gomati Nagar area of Lucknow.

This bulldozer action executed by the state has affected more than 100 farmers who sold their flower supply in this particular flower market. It is believed that the flower market contributed to Rs 2-3 lakhs of trade on a daily basis. During the seasons of festivals or weddings, the trade exceeded Rs 10 lac daily in this market.

The flower market earlier operated from the 2000 sq ft of land behind the Imambada area of the city. It was shifted to the Hussainabad Trust land in the year 2001. The administration is said to have issued notices to the farmers to shift their business to ‘Kisan Bazar’ but the farmers protested. With special efforts and cooperation of the district administration and police department, all types of flower trade in Chowk, Lucknow, then were transferred to Kisan Bazaar, Vibhuti Khand, Gomati Nagar, Lucknow in 2019.

The District Magistrate in 2022 issued a letter to terminate the lease of the flower market and remove the encroachments. Further, in the year 2023, the Trust issued a notice asking the farmers to vacate the land.

In the year 2024, the lease of the Hussainabad Trust was canceled and the farmers were issued notice again to vacate the land. The farmers again launched a protest. However, the state executed the bulldozer action demolishing the illegal structure in Lucknow.

The Flower Market Welfare Committee had requested Deputy CM Brajesh Pathak to save the flower market. A month ago, the Committee’s people also went to meet him. However, the administration issued notices in June 2024 to vacate the illegal market instead. “If not complied with by 2:00 PM on 26-06-2024, the flower market and other illegal encroachments will be forcibly removed, and the entire expense will be recovered from them,” the notice read.

Foreign affairs sole prerogative the Union Government as per the constitution, states should not intrude: MEA on Kerala govt appointing ‘foreign secretary’

Reacting to Kerala government appointing a Secretary for External Cooperation, the Ministry of External Affairs said that foreign affairs are the “sole prerogative” of the Union Government and not concurrent or state subject, adding that the state governments should not intrude into matters that are beyond their constitutional jurisdiction.

This comes after Kerala government ‘appointed’ senior IAS officer, K Vasuki, as a secretary in charge of “matters concerning external cooperation”.

“The Constitution of India, under the 7th Schedule list 1–Union list, item 10, clearly specifies that foreign affairs and all matters which bring the Union into relation with any foreign country, are the sole prerogative of the Union Government,” MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said in the weekly press briefing on Thursday.

“Foreign affairs is not a concurrent subject and definitely not a state subject. Our position is that State governments should not intrude into matters that are beyond their constitutional jurisdiction,” he added.

The order by the Kerala government dated July 15, stated that the secretary (labour and skills) K Vasuki “will hold the additional charge of the matters connected with external cooperation.”

It also mentioned that the Resident Commissioner at Kerala House in the national capital will be supporting Vasuki in matters concerning external cooperation and will liaise with the Ministry of External Affairs, Missions, and Embassies.

This announcement attracted strong criticism from the Centre as well as the Bharatiya Janata Party.

BJP State President K Surendran slammed the Pinarayi Vijayan-led Kerala government, saying that it is a “blatant overreach” and a violation of the Union List of the Constitution.

“The appointment of an IAS officer as ‘Foreign Secretary’ in Kerala by CM Pinarayi Vijayan is a blatant overreach and a violation of the Union list of our Constitution. The LDF government has no mandate for foreign affairs. This unconstitutional move sets a dangerous precedent. Is CM Pinarayi Vijayan trying to establish Kerala as a separate nation?” Surendran said on X.

Reacting to the criticism, Kerala Chief Secretary, Dr V Venu, clarified, saying the appointment was part of an effort to establish new relations for the development of the state. He further said the move was not meant to engage in diplomatic relations, which was under the central government’s jurisdiction.

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor also reacted to the appointment and said that there was nothing unusual and that the appointment of the young officer was a focal point of responsibility within the government.  


(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

My grandfather died for the nation, not for Congress: Former Punjab CM Beant Singh’s grandson Ravneet Bittu slams Congress leader Charanjit Channi in Parliament

On Thursday, July 25, BJP leader Ravneet Bittu confronted Congress MP Charanjit Channi in the Parliament after Channi made a remark about Bittu’s grandfather, former CM of Punjab Beant Singh. While speaking in the Parliament, Congress MP Charanjit Channi said that Bittu’s grandfather actually died after Bittu left Congress.

Responding to Channi’s comment “Bittu Ji, your grandfather was a martyr, but he died when you left the Congress”, Ravneet Singh Bittu, a state minister in the NDA government, responded that his grandfather didn’t die for the Congress party, but for the nation.

Ravneet Bittu also said that Charanjit Channi is the richest person in Punjab and he should not talk about poverty, since he is worth thousands of Crores.

Notably Ravneet Singh Bittu was earlier a member of the Congress party but he left them to join Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

The Lok Sabha was adjourned for 30 minutes following the argument between Charanjeet Singh Channi and the Ravneet Singh Bittu.

Beant Singh Assassination

Punjab CM Beant Singh, who was the Chief Minister of Punjab from 1992 to 1995. Beant Singh was assassinated outside Punjab Secretariat in 1995 by Khalistani terrorists. He was the 12th Chief Minister of Punjab and a member of Indian National Congress.

He was assassinated in a bomb blast at the secretariat complex in Chandigarh on August 31, 1995. The blast claimed the lives of 17 others including 3 Indian commandos. Khalistani outfits Babbar Khalsa and Khalistan Commando Force were held responsible for the assassination.

CBI court finds 14 people including CPM leader guilty in 14-year-old murder case of Congress leader Anchal Ramabhadran in Kerala, 4 acquitted: Details

Fourteen individuals including Babu Panicker, a member of the CPM Kollam district committee, have been found guilty by a special CBI court in Thiruvananthapuram of killing 44-year-old Congress member Anchal Ramabhadran, at Yeroor in Anchal in 2010. The court will pronounce the sentence on 30th July. Meanwhile, four others including S Jayamohan, chairman of the Cashew Development Corporation and a member of the district secretariat, Riyaz, Markson Yesudas and Roykutty who were charged in the case were acquitted due to lack of evidence.

CPM activists killed INTUC office bearer Ramabhadran on 10th April 2010, at approximately nine o’clock at night in his rented Yeroor home. Ramachandran was having a conversation with his kids in the kitchen when the accused burst into the residence. Ramabhadran attempted to flee the house upon witnessing them, however, they went after him and hacked him to death. Ramabhadran was taken to the hospital right away, but the next morning he passed away from his wounds.

The testimony of his wife and two kids, who revealed that the perpetrators mercilessly and cruelly ended the life of Ramabhadran in front of them played a vital role in the case. They were deemed culpable under Sections 20 and 27 of the Arms Act as well as Sections 302, 120 (b), and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The culprits were identified as Girishkumar, Padman, Afzal, Najmal, Shibu, Vimal, Sudheesh, Shan, Ratheesh, Biju, Ranjith, Sally alias Kochunni, Riaz alias Muneer, DYFI leader Riaz, Markson, former CPM Anchal Area Secretary PS Suman, CPM ex-District Committee member Babu Panicker, Jaimohan, Roykutty, and Ravindran. 

The murder trial started late. After Ramabhadran’s family petitioned the court, dissatisfied with the results of the initial inquiry conducted by the local police and the crime branch, the probe was turned over to the CBI. Initially, the local police detained sixteen CPM employees but Bindhu, the wife of Ramabhadran, filed a case with the High Court, asserting that the Left government’s inquiry was unfair which resulted in the CBI’s involvement.

Ramabhadran was an INTUC local leader and the vice-president of the Congress for the Eroor seat. According to the CBI inquiry, Ramabhadran’s attempts to boost the Congress party’s popularity and recruit CPM members to the party were the reason behind the murder. The crime was the result of an altercation between the local Congress workers and the first accused, Girish, a CPM member. The murder was considered to have been caused by animosity over a fight that broke out during a temple celebration in the area, following which Ramabhadran assisted some of the people who had been jailed in obtaining bail, based on other reports.

The world remembers Akhlaq, but not Tejram: Here is how Tejram was lynched in Bareilly by a Muslim mob over stopping them from playing drums outside Hindu temple

On Muharram this year, several incidents of mob violence and raising of slogans like ‘Sar tan se juda’ or ‘Hindustan mein rehna hai to Allah hu Akbar kehna hai” have been reported in various parts of India. However, there was no “idea of India khatre mein hai” or “lynchistan” type outrage on the ground or on social media. Why? Because the victims were Hindus and the perpetrators were Islamists. In Uttar Pradesh’s Bareilly district, an incident of mob lynching has been reported wherein a Hindu youth named Tejram was brutally lynched by a Muslim mob on 18th July after Hindus objected to Muslims playing “dhol” outside a Hindu temple during a Muharram procession on 17th July in Gausganj area.

An altercation ensued over Hindus stopping Muslims from playing Dhol [drums] in front of a Hindu temple on 17th July during the Muharram procession. The accused Muslims then started attacking the Hindus and pelting stones at their houses and harassing the women. The ruckus had continued even after the arrival of the police. The Muslims later called more people from Rampur, CB Ganj, Mirganj, Devarniya and other neighbouring areas and attacked Hindu houses on the night of Friday with stones, sticks and other things.

Tejram was dragged out of his home to a mosque and mercilessly beaten, autopsy report reveals horrifying details

During the attack on Hindus by accused Muslims on the night of July 18th, Tejram sustained severe injuries on the head. An IndiaToday report said that some 80-100 persons arrived in the Gausganj neighbourhood and began pelting stones, breaking into houses, vandalising them, and beating up the residents. The villagers said that the Muslim attackers dragged Tejram from his house to the mosque and brutally thrashed the 26-year-old youth. Tejram’s family has said that he was attempting to defuse the matter. The Hindu youth was rushed to the hospital, however, Shahi Police Station in-charge Amit Kumar said that the victim succumbed to his injuries during treatment. Subsequently, the deceased victim’s body was sent for postmortem examination.

The postmortem report mentions the brutality inflicted by the attackers during the lynching of Tejram. The report said that the skull bones of victim Tejram were damaged during the mob lynching as a result of strikes from large stones and iron rods, and blood clots had developed in his brain. While Tejram was trying to escape, his both hands and shoulders bleeding.

Police books attackers, 35 arrested

After the mob violence, a case was then filed by the Hindu community against 50 identified individuals and 15 unidentified individuals. The Police eventually began an investigation into the case and arrested around 35 persons including Afsar Ali, Imran, Mukhtiar Ali, Abdul, Salam, and others. When police tried to arrest some accused, the accused had opened fire on police personnel too. The police had to open retaliatory fire. This resulted in injury to one of the accused identified as Alamgir. After this incident, one Najakat Ali was also arrested by the police. A constable was injured by shrapnel in the firing.

Yogi government takes bulldozer action

On Tuesday (23rd July), the district administration of Uttar Pradesh’s Bareilly razed over nine houses belonging to the Muslim accused in the case. Before this, the administration demolished 11 buildings belonging to the accused persons after finding that they constructed houses on Gram Samaj’s government land.

Houses of the accused persons razed by the Bareilly district administration (Source: IndiaToday)

During the demolition drive, the house of the main accused Bakhtawar was also razed to the ground. In addition, the illegal houses of accused Babu, Hasan Ali, Kader Ali, Hanif, Haseen, and Riyasat have also been marked for demolition.

No outrage on Tejram’s lynching by a Muslim mob and the silence of the media

Do you remember Akhlaq? Do you remember Pehlu Khan? Yes, you do! These names have been etched in your memory since the entire media, left-liberal ecosystem and political vultures made sure you do, and feel “ashamed as a Hindu” and guilty. A mere mention of these two names refreshes one’s memory of how the anti-Hindu cabal and placard gang berated Hindustan as “lynchistan” to assert that somehow the Muslim ‘minority’ is no longer safe under the Modi-led ‘Hindutva’ government.

When incidences like the alleged lynching of Akhlaq in 2015 and cow smuggler Pehlu Khan occurred in 2017, there was massive criticism, media coverage, and outrage from a variety of sources, including liberals and self-proclaimed ‘human rights’ activists. Akhlaq’s lynching, in which he was suspected of storing beef, became a national issue, sparking debates about intolerance and mob violence in India against ‘minorities’ even as it turned out that while Akhlaq’s family had claimed the meat in question was mutton, the final report on the same confirmed it was from a cow. However, similar outrage and attention appear to be non-existent in the case of the lynching of Tejaram since he was a Hindu lynched by those belonging to an ‘oppressed’ minority. A man named Tabrez beaten to death in Jharkhand in 2019 over allegations of theft sparked more outrage than over a Hindu youth who spoke for his community being lynched by Muslims.

While news anchors conducted primetime debates to peddle the ‘darr ka mahaul’ narrative, long op-eds were written by anti-Hindu pens for hire in Indian and Western media passing off incidents of violence over cattle smuggling allegations as the lynching of Muslims by ‘Hindutva’ mobs, there is deafening ‘secular’ silence over the horrific lynching of Tejaram in Bareilly. Except for a few journalists, the mainstream media which takes delight in preaching to Hindus how they are becoming ‘intolerant’, is absolutely mum over a Hindu man’s lynching by Muslims, and incidents involving the raising of murderous ‘Sar tan se juda’ slogans during Muharram processions. You will not see primetime debates with ‘experts’ discussing where the country is heading.

While Hindus have the least expectations from biased media publications, their silence on incidents of religiously motivated violence against Hindus is dangerous. Their silence contributes to the normalisation of anti-Hindu violence. If narrative building is an art, Islamists and their media allies are its Picasso. On the one hand, Islamists and Muslim ‘journalists’ stir outrage even by peddling fake ‘mob lynching by Hindus’ narrative over incidents wherein the deceased happens to be a Muslim with no communal angle whatsoever, on the other, incidents of violence against Hindus do not get enough attention forget outrage and even the media forgets such incidents after one or two short articles or mentioning them in ‘100 fatafat’ news on television.

The media bias contributes to the perpetuation of a narrative wherein Muslims are permanent victims while Hindus are disregarded. Furthermore, it denies victims equal respect and justice because their cases do not receive the attention and advocacy that would help in getting justice for Hindu victims.

Apparently, the biased media and Hindu-hating political parties have successfully established the narrative that there are two types of mob lynching: one is “communal lynching” wherein the victim happens to be a Muslim regardless of the existence of any communal angle or not, and the other is “secular lynching” wherein Hindus are the victims of mob violence by Muslims. They have managed to convince the public that somehow only alleged ‘communal lynching’ is worth street protests, candle marches, social media outrage, primetime debates, celebrities crying ‘Not my India’ etc. It seems that the incidents of anti-Hindu violence are being deliberately downplayed to convince the Hindus that only the Muslim ‘minority’ can be victims and since Hindus are the majority community they are by default the oppressors.

Just imagine the outrage had Tejram’s name been Tabarez and it was the occasion of Ram Navami or Hanuman Jayanti instead of Muharram. Notably, in what seems like a deliberate cover-up, most mainstream media reports did not even mention that Tejaram was lynched allegedly inside a mosque. No wonder, the killers of Kamlesh Tiwari get bail while the deceased Hindu is forgotten while death anniversaries of cow smugglers and cow meat hoarders are observed by Islamists every year. The short-term memory of Hindus further helps them in downplaying anti-Hindu violence and whitewashing the crimes of Islamists as well as using the desperation of Hindus to hold moral high ground to guilt trip them over incidents wherein the deceased happens to be Muslim. Hindus are definitely losing the narrative battle despite being persecuted while Islamists, with the help of their media allies and politicians continue to control the narrative and even influence elections by playing perpetual victimhood. So far, the cases of grooming jihad [also called love jihad] are dismissed as ‘fiction’, ‘hoax’ and ‘conspiracy theory’, soon the cases of anti-Hindu violence will also be given similar tags.

The regular Q&A drama between Pakistani journalist and US State Dept to lecture India is now peddling false claims of Muslim victimhood: How the question about Kanwar Yatra made it obvious

On 24th July (local time), US State Department Spokesperson, Matthew Miller responded to a question about the implementation of the directive of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments to put up names of owners and workers of shops, restaurants and carts on Kanwar Yatra marg and outside Ujjain Mahakal Temple. The question was asked by Pakistani journalist Jahanzaib Ali who is known for putting up questions making it easier for the US Government to meddle with India’s internal affairs. It was interesting to see him asking the question and the reply that followed as it appeared scripted.

Ali asked, “Indian media is reporting that in a few states, the BJP government is forcing Muslim owners of restaurants to display their Muslim names at their eateries, but due to growing hate against Muslims, they fear it will bring more problems for them. What are your thoughts when you see such kind of action by any government?” Ali’s emotionless read of the question from the mobile made it evident that he was not prepared to ask the question.

Matthew Miller replied citing the Supreme Court’s interim stay on the directive and said, “We have seen those reports. We have also seen the reports that the Indian Supreme Court on July 22nd issued an interim stay on the implementation of those rules, so they’re not actually in effect now. Speaking generally, we are, as we always say, committed to promoting and respecting universal – promoting and protecting, I should say, universal respect for the right of freedom of religion and belief for all anywhere in the world, and we have engaged with our Indian counterparts on the importance of equal treatment for members of all religious communities.”

Interestingly, Matthew Miller was all prepared to answer the question with all the facts in hand even though it is a rather trivial regular development in India and ideally, he should have restrained from commenting on it considering India-US relations. Notably, the next date in the matter has been set as 26th July by the Supreme Court of India. The reply of the US State Department’s spokesperson is now in public and it should be seen as a pressure tactic on the Indian judicial system as well as on the Government of India. So far, the Union Ministry of External Affairs has not released any statement in this regard.

How a glaring error in Jahanzaib Ali’s question was overlooked, was it deliberate?

Curiously, Miller, who had all the details and developments regarding the order and Supreme Court’s subsequent order, did not bother to point out a glaring error in Jahanzaib Ali’s question. The directive of the UP, MP and Uttarakhand govts was for ALL the vendors and shopkeepers to display their names along the Kanwar routes, not just Muslims. The order, now stayed by the Supreme Court, was applicable on Hindu vendors too but Ali carefully phrased his question to imply only Muslim vendors were forced to display their names.

It is just that only some Muslims had a problem with displaying their names in their shops.

Interestingly, Jahanzaib Ali deliberately made it sound like a Muslim-specific order and Miller didn’t bother to rectify it, despite being obviously aware of the facts of the case, along with all recent developments and the Supreme Court order too.

Supreme Court prohibited displaying names outside eateries

On 22nd July, the Supreme Court of India gave interim relief to petitioners against the governments of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Uttarakhand directive asking shopkeepers, eateries, hotels, restaurants, dhabas etc to display their names and their workers’ names prominently outside the shop. The directive that was first given by Muzaffarnagar police was to ensure the Kanwariyas did not face any problems while choosing where to buy food items in order to ensure their religious practice. However, the petitioners contended in the court that it was against the constitution and discriminatory promoting untouchability. As there was no one representing the states in the court, an interim order favouring the petitioners was passed. The next date of the hearing is 26th July. The court, however, left a window for legislative intervention.

Who is Jahanzaib Ali?

Jahanzaib Ali is originally from Pakistan. According to his LinkedIn profile, he has been associated with Pakistani channel ARY News since October 2014. His questions targetting India are well-documented. OpIndia’s report on Ali can be checked here.

President Droupadi Murmu announces that Durbar Hall and Ashok Hall in Rashtrapati Bhavan have been renamed Ganatantra Mandap and Ashok Mandap

0

President Droupadi Murmu announced on Thursday that two of the important halls of Rashtrapati Bhavan, namely, Durbar Hall and Ashok Hall, have been renamed as Ganatantra Mandap and Ashok Mandap, respectively, according to a President’s Secretariat release.

According to the release, the renaming was part of making the ambience of the Rashtrapati Bhavan “reflective of Indian cultural values and ethos.”

“Rashtrapati Bhavan, the office and residence of the President of India, is a symbol of the nation, and an invaluable heritage of the people. Continuous efforts are being made to make it more accessible to people. There has been a consistent endeavour to make the ambience of the Rashtrapati Bhavan reflective of the Indian cultural values and ethos,” the release mentioned.

Durbar Hall is the venue of important ceremonies and celebrations, such as the presentation of the National Awards. The term ‘Durbar’ refers to courts and assemblies of Indian rulers and the British.

The release stated that it lost relevance after India became a republic, that is, ‘Ganatantra’. The concept of ‘Ganatantra’ is deeply rooted in Indian society since ancient times, making ‘Ganatantra Mandap’ an apt name for the venue.

“Ashok Hall was originally a ballroom. The word ‘Ashok’ connotes someone who is “free from all sufferings” or “bereft of any sorrow”. Also, ‘Ashoka’ refers to Emperor Ashok, a symbol of unity and peaceful coexistence. The National Emblem of the Republic of India is the lion capital of Ashok from Sarnath. The word also refers to the Ashok tree, which has deep significance in Indian religious traditions as well as arts and culture,” it said.

Renaming ‘Ashok Hall’ as ‘Ashok Mandap’ brings uniformity in language and removes the traces of anglicisation while upholding the key values associated with the word ‘Ashok’, it added.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Ghaziabad: Mohammad Alam, father of four, strangles his second wife Pooja Devi to death with her dupatta, dumps her body in canal

Mohammad Alam (35) from Hapur murdered Pooja Devi, his 33-year-old wife, in Uttar Pradesh’s Ghaziabad and disposed of her body in the canal. He was already married with four children and didn’t want to keep her with him. The police have registered a case and arrested the accused on 24th July.

According to reports, Mohammad Alam was in a live-in relationship with Pooja for at least four years. She was at odds with her first husband. She insisted on living with the perpetrator which angered him and he strangled her to death with her dupatta and threw the body in the Ganga canal. Afterwards, he also filed a missing person report with the police on the same day.

The matter came to light when Pooja’s sister Poonam approached the authorities and lodged a complaint that her sister had been missing for a few days. She was suspicious of Mohammad Alam as he stayed with the victim and the cops looked into the case. They apprehended and interrogated him after which he confessed to the crime and revealed that he met Pooja five years ago in the Vijaynagar area of Ghaziabad where he used to run a car mechanic shop. The two then grew closer.

Pooja who had three children had separated from her husband and was living apart from him at a house in Sector 9, Vijay Nagar. The two became more intimate and eventually moved in together. Mohammad Alam’s wife Shana stayed in the village. He established an auto repair business in Noida a while after meeting the deceased. The couple got married in a Nikah ceremony at home six months ago and a few days later, she began putting pressure on him to leave his first spouse and live with her.

She continuously forced him to comply which was against his wishes and hence he decided to get rid of her and planned to murder her. On 19th July she again pushed him for the same. His son was admitted to a hospital in Ghaziabad at the time and she told him to come there and meet her. Afterwards, they met outside, and the culprit took Pooja in a car. An argument broke out between the duo and he choked her to death and dumped her body in Ganga canal. He then went to the police station to submit a missing person’s complaint. The police arrested Mohammad Alam from Ghaziabad and registered a case against him after the truth was disclosed.

He notified police that his wife had left the house following a fight and had turned off her phone, in the early hours of 20th July, per other media reports. On 22nd July, however, Poonam accused him of kidnapping her sister in a police complaint.

Rajesh Kumar, deputy commissioner of police (city zone) unveiled that on 19th July Mohammad Alam fixed a customer’s Santro automobile and drove it to a Masoori hospital where his son was hospitalized owing to a liver infection. According to the investigation, at approximately 8:00 pm, Pooja contacted him and insisted that he return home, however, he declined and told her was going to see his kid which led to a disagreement. Pooja then informed him that she would also be visiting the hospital.

He further informed, “After the second missing person complaint, police got suspicious and questioned Alam at length. He broke down and admitted to killing Devi. He told us that his son was admitted to a hospital for the past several days and Devi was pressuring him to stay with her and not visit the hospital. As a result, the two had an altercation near the hospital. At 9:30 pm, Pooja reached the hospital. Alam asked her to wait for him outside. Later, Alam took her in the Santro car towards the Ganga canal and the two kept arguing throughout their journey. Alam told us that he took Devi in a Santro car to a canal near Masoori and strangled her to death on the night of July 22. He later dumped the body in the canal.”

The official added, “The suspect murdered the woman in the car on an isolated road near the canal. He dumped the body in the canal and it is yet to be recovered. We seized the car used in the crime and arrested the suspect for murder and destruction of evidence.” A First Information Report has been registered and section 140 (2) (kidnapping or abducting to murder or for ransom) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita has been invoked against him. “Police are currently trying to recover the body. Soon, the police will add BNS section 103 (punishment for murder),” stated an official.

Congress govt in Karnataka passes resolution against NEET in assembly, demands return to state-organised CET for medical admissions

0

Raising its strong voice against the all-India medical entrance exam NEET, the Siddaramaiah-led Congress government on Thursday passed a resolution in both houses of the state government against the exam and demanded the Centre for allowing the state to revert back to the earlier system of CET for medical admissions in Karnataka.

Pointing out the flaws and the recent irregularities in the NEET exam, the resolution urged the Union Government to exempt the State of Karnataka from this examination and allow it to provide admissions to medical colleges based on the Common Entrance Test (CET) conducted by the state government.

While the State Minister of Medical Education and Skill Development, Dr Sharan Prakash Patil, moved the resolution in the legislative assembly, Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar presented it in the legislative council.

“The NEET examination system severely affects the medical education opportunities of poor rural students and deprives the rights of the state governments to admit students in the state government medical colleges and considering the repeated irregularities in the NEET examination, the Union Government should make necessary amendments in the National Medical Commission Act, 2019 (Central Act 30 of 2019) so that the NEET system is given up at the national level. Also, the Karnataka Legislative Council unanimously urges that the Union government should immediately exempt the state of Karnataka from examination and provide medical admission based on the Common Entrance Test (CET) conducted by the state government,” the resolution said.

” Medical Education Minister Dr Sharan Prakash Patil has been continuously opposing the NEET exam by highlighting the massive irregularities and how this system was affecting the chances of underprivileged and rural students and their dream of a medical profession,” it added.

On Wednesday, the ruling TMC government in West Bengal moved a resolution in the West Bengal Assembly demanding the scrapping of the NEET and restoration of the previous system of individual state governments conducting such examinations. The resolution was passed in the assembly.

Earlier on Tuesday, July 23, the Supreme Court declined to cancel the NEET-UG 2024 exam, realising that giving direction for a fresh NEET-UG for the present year would be replete with serious consequences for over 24 lakh students who appeared in this exam.

The apex court was hearing a batch of pleas seeking direction to recall NEET-UG 2024 results and to conduct the examination afresh, alleging paper leakage and malpractices in the test held.


(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)