Home Blog Page 1097

Did you know: Congress-led central govts in 1963 and 1974 passed laws forcing Indians to deposit up to 18 per cent of their income

Paurush Gupta
-
0
Did you know: Congress-led central govts in 1963 and 1974 passed laws forcing Indians to deposit up to 18 per cent of their income

On 21st April, Prime Minister Narendra Modi lambasted Congress over ‘Wealth Redistribution’ after Rahul Gandhi promised the same in case the opposition parties form the government. Addressing a rally in Banswara, Rajasthan, PM Modi warned the voters that according to the Congress party’s announcement if they form the government, gold, silver, ornaments like Mangalsutra, property, etc of Indians will be surveyed. 

He added that after doing the wealth survey they (opposition led by Congress) will distribute it to people who have more children, to illegal migrants, and to Muslims, for whom Manmohan Singh had said they had the first right over resources.

While PM’s critical remarks have led to a political furore with Congress claiming otherwise, it is pertinent to note that the Congress-led governments in the past had passed laws that forced Indians and made it mandatory to deposit a part of their salary for a lock-in period of about 3-5 years. 

The Congress party enacted a law called the Compulsory Deposit Scheme Act in 1963 and 1974. The act applied to all taxpayers, property owners, and all government employees. It forced them to deposit a certain percentage of their salary, revenue generated from land use, urban property, etc. The 1974 act forced taxpayers to deposit up to 18% of their incomes under this scheme. The deposit was withheld for a period of 3 or 5 years.

(Rate of Compulsory deposit as per the CDS Act 1974)

Incidentally, Dr. Manmohan Singh was the Chief Economic Advisor of the Congress government in 1974 when one of these Deposit Schemes was enacted.

Strikingly, the act was brought in the interest of “economic development”. The Compulsory Deposit Scheme 1963 states, “An Act to provide in the interest of national economic development for compulsory deposit and for the framing of a scheme in relation thereto.” 

It adds, “This Act shall apply to the following categories of persons, 

namely:—

(a) persons liable to payment of land revenue

(b) persons liable to payment of tax under the Income-tax Act;

(c) holders of immovable properties situated in urban areas assessed to tax 

(d) employees of—

(i) the Central and State Governments,

(ii) local authorities,

(iii) companies as defined in section 3 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), including foreign companies 

(iv) any other corporation (including a cooperative society) established by or under a Central, Provincial, or State Acts,

(v) individuals or associations of persons or bodies of individuals liable to payment of tax under the Income-tax Act

(e) dealers …

(f) such other categories of persons whose annual income is one thousand five hundred rupees or more and who are not liable to payment of tax under the Income-tax Act, as may be specified by the Central Government by notification in the Official Gazette.

The act further lists Requirements that have to be maintained as per the compulsory deposit scheme and allows the government to frame subsequent CDS Acts which would specify the rates and tenure for which the amount could be withheld. It also allowed the government the power to suspend, reduce, or remit the amount of compulsory deposit as well as exempt persons/companies from the operation of all or any of the provisions of this Act, etc. 

Likewise, the CDS Act 1974 specified the rates and tenure for making the compulsory deposits among other details of requirements and ambit of the law. 

Highlighting the same, several netizens have slammed the Congress party for forcing people to deposit a significant part of their portion in a fund that was mandatorily withheld for years. 

Slamming the Congress, X user Arun Pudur wrote, “Beware! CONgress’s wealth redistribution Schemes/Scams are nothing but daylight robbery! Twice in history, they’ve snatched hard-earned money from hardworking Indians.”

Apart from attacking the Congress party for the past laws, netizens have claimed that if the grand old party forced Indians to do it in the past, they could do it again if they came to power.

‘We are living in a state of terror’: Another Sandeshkhali in making in West Bengal, villagers accuse TMC leader of sexual harassment

OpIndia Staff
-
0
‘We are living in a state of terror’: Another Sandeshkhali in making in West Bengal, villagers accuse TMC leader of sexual harassment

An influential Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader in the Nadia district of West Bengal has come under the scanner for exploitation of women and creating a Sandeshkhali-like atmosphere.

According to a report by Calcutta News, the perpetrator was identified as TMC leader Pradip Sarkar. The villagers have accused him of harassing them at their house during the daytime.

“He enters our homes, clicks pictures and spreads them around. He also warns us about releasing the images on the internet. If we object, then, he threatens to murder our husbands,” a woman said.

Another woman recounted, “We are in a state of terror. ” According to the villagers, the police and the district administration have been working in cahoots with the accused Trinamool Congress leader

“He (Pradip Sarkar) openly tells us that the thana (police station) and court are in his pockets and that our complaints will have no bearing on him,” one woman lamented. A local resident Sahdeb Das said, “Nothing has been done against the accused so far.”

While speaking about the matter, BJP leader named Rohit Jan informed, “The problem has been going on for the past 4 years.” The development is reminiscent of the atrocities committed by TMC goon Sheikh Shahjahan and his aides Uttam Sardar and Shibu Prasad Hazra in Sndeshkhali village.

On Sunday (21st April), BJP MP (Ranaghat constituency) Jagannath Sarkar met the women villagers and listened to their grievances. “This (harassment of women) is being done at the behest of Mamata Banerjee. So I demand her removal from office,” he emphasised.

Turmoil in Sandeshkhali

The unrest in Sandeshkhali village in North 24 Parganas district of West Bengal brought into focus the atrocities committed against women by former Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Sheikh Shahjahan and his aides Shibu Prasad Hazra and Uttam Sardar.

Multiple women have come forward to narrate instances of land grabbing, and sexual violence perpetrated against them by the trio. Forced by circumstances, they took matters into their own hands and gheraoed the police station.

The agitation led by women eventually led to the arrest of the 3 TMC goons. OpIndia had previously reported how the Trinamool Congress, led by West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, have left no stone unturned to trivialise the sexual violence committed against women in Sandeshkhali.

Besides Mamata Banerjee, TMC MLA Udayan Guha also attempted to downplay the sexual exploitation of women in Sandeshkhali as ‘eating pie (Pitha khaowa)’ and ‘mischief (Dushtami)’ on 29th February.

TMC spokesperson Jui Biswas also sought to deny sexual violence in Sandeshkhali by demanding ‘video footage of rapes’ as proof. Journalist’ Sagarika Ghose, who was recently rewarded with a Rajya Sabha seat by the TMC, also trivialised the raging unrest in Sandeshkhali village as a ‘local land dispute.’

TMC Minister Partha Bhowmick had earlier tried to dismiss accusations of sexual violence by women of Sandeshkhali village as ‘fake.’ On 10th March, the actress turned TMC candidate from Hooghly, Rachna Banerjee, was seen casting aspersions on the sexual violence faced by women in Sandeshkhali.

Last month, a video of Kolkata Mayor and Trinamool Congress MLA Firham Hakim doing whataboutery on the plight of women of Sandeshkhali village had surfaced on social media. While mocking the ordeal of women, he said, “Now, you know that one ‘khali’ is grabbing all headlines. What ‘Khali’? Ah, Sandeshkhali. It is everywhere.”

Gujarat BJP creates history: Mukesh Dalal declared winner in Surat LS seat after other candidates withdraw nominations

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Gujarat BJP creates history: Mukesh Dalal declared winner in Surat LS seat after other candidates withdraw nominations

In an unusual turn of events, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has won the Surat Lok Sabha constituency without any opposition. The revocation of Congress candidate Nilesh Kumbhani’s nomination, combined with the withdrawal of eight independent candidates, has cleared the way for the BJP’s Mukesh Dalal to be declared the Member of Parliament (MP) unopposed. An important turning point in India’s electoral history has been reached with this momentous development.

Even before the third phase of voting for the Gujarat Lok Sabha elections starts on May 7, the political landscape in the diamond city of Surat has changed dramatically. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won an unprecedented victory in the Surat Lok Sabha seat after the district election officer (DEO) rejected Congress candidate Nilesh Kumbhani’s candidature and eight independent candidates withdrew theirs on Monday (22nd April). 

According to sources, eight contenders other than the BJP dropped their candidature for the Surat Lok Sabha seat since Congress candidate Nilesh Kumbhani’s nomination form was rejected. The latest withdrawal was made by BSP candidate Pyarelal on 22nd April after which the BJP was declared the winner unchallenged. Around 2:30 PM, BSP candidate Pyarelal reached the Surat Collector’s office and withdrew his nomination paper.

Along with this, Surat became the country’s first uncontested Lok Sabha seat in the Lok Sabha elections in 2024. After the unopposed win, BJP’s Mukesh Dalal reached out to meet BJP state president CR Patil who congratulated him.

Notably, BJP candidate Mukesh Dalal earlier attacked Congress during one of his campaigns at Allpad saying, “The party which is dreaming of ruling the country by forming the government, its candidate’s forms are being canceled, what should it rule? The Congress is dying out all over the country.”

He further said, “Congress is going to end in the whole country and it is starting from Surat Lok Sabha seat. Congress has 52 MPs. But take my word for it, on June 4, the Congress will have enough heads left to fit in a small CT bus. Congress will get only 40 seats in the entire country.”

It should be mentioned that Surat politics got heated up over the previous two or three days after the BJP filed an objection petition against Congress candidate Nilesh Kumbhani. There were allegations that three supporters’ signatures in the Congress nomination were faked. After that, a hearing was convened on the matter and the Congress candidate’s form was canceled none of its supporters showed up. 

The concept of a candidate getting elected unopposed in parliamentary or assembly elections is uncommon in India’s complex democracy. However, such incidents have occurred on rare occasions throughout the country’s political history, dating back to the first general election in 1951.

Surat now adds another chapter to the saga of electoral anomalies, with the BJP’s Mukesh Dalal on track to become the constituency’s first uncontested MP.

The Election Commission of India’s guidebook for returning officers outlines the protocol for “unopposed returns.” It states that if there is only one contesting candidate in a constituency, they will be proclaimed properly elected immediately following the deadline for withdrawal of candidature. In this scenario, the need for a poll is eliminated, advancing the electoral process.

The last uncontested Lok Sabha election victory was in 1989, when Mohammad Shafi Bhat won from Srinagar. Since then, the electoral situation has been marked by intense campaigns, making Surat’s unchallenged election triumph a notable exception.

‘My daughter refused to convert’: Neha’s father says Fayaz was assisted by a group for love jihad, had informers to track her movements

OpIndia Staff
-
0
‘My daughter refused to convert’: Neha’s father says Fayaz was assisted by a group for love jihad, had informers to track her movements

Niranjan Hiremath, the father of deceased Neha Hiremath, who was stabbed to death by her former classmate Fayaz last week in Hubbali, has stated to media that his daughter was forced to convert her religion, and she refused. As per reports, Congress leader Niranjan Hiremath told before media that Fayaz killed Neha because she had refused to convert to Islam.

“They were forcing her to convert. Since she didn’t agree to religious conversion, she was murdered,” Niranjan Hiremath, the Congress Councillor from Hubballi-Dharwad Municipal Corporation (HDMC), said

Niranjan Hiremath had told earlier also that the murder of his daughter is a case of ‘love jihad’. Hiremath had also accused the state government led by Siddaramaiah of trying to pass the case off as an incident of ‘personal enmity’ because that tends to ignore the religious motive behind the crime.

Hiremath added that Neha was religiously inclined and was actively involved in the social events of their community. Dismissing the claims Neha was in a romantic relationship with Fayaz, Niranjan asserted that Neha was very active in college events and that is why there are many photographs of Neha and Fayaz circulating online. Additionally, Neha was an ambitious girl who went for higher education, unlike Fayaz, who was a dropout.

Neha had already rejected advances by Fayaz and told him flat that she was not interested in pursuing a relationship with him, as per Neha’s family. Asserting again that Neha’s murder was a case of love jihad, Hiremath stated that Fayaz was trained by a group to target non-Muslim girls. The group had provided boarding and other facilities to Fayaz. He added that he has given the names of 4 other persons to the police who were involved in this activity of targeting and stalking girls from certain families.

‘Fayaz did proper planning, more people are involved. This is a planned murder’: Neha’s father

Speaking to the media, Niranjan Hiremath added that Fayaz comes from a place 100 km away from the place of murder. “It is impossible that he did it all alone. He had engaged many ‘informers’ in the college to get information on Neha’s movements, from outside the college gate to inside the campus. Some students and batchmates outside the campus were involved. They were all passing information about Neha’s whereabouts and movements to Fayaz, Hiremath added.

On April 21, speaking to media, Niranjan Hiremath demanded a CBI inquiry if the Karnataka police are unable to take necessary action to nab all the culprits.

On April 22, the state government handed over the investigation into the Neha Hiremath murder case to the CID. Speaking to the media after the development, Neha’s father thanked the state government and everyone who has stood up with the family demanding justice for Neha.

Neha Hiremath was stabbed to death on 18th April by Fayaz at B V Bhoomaraddi College of Engineering and Technology in Hubbali where the two were studying and the entire incident was captured on camera. She was rejecting his overtures to get into a relationship, despite his persistent pestering. He killed her because he was reportedly dismayed and angry after he had been pursuing and stalking her for several months.

USA’s Congressional Research Service report says CAA provisions violate Articles 14 and 15 of Indian constitution, here’s how it is wrong

Shraddha Pandey
-
0
USA’s Congressional Research Service report says CAA provisions violate Articles 14 and 15 of Indian constitution, here’s how it is wrong

A day before voting commenced in India on 19th April, the US Congress research wing, Congressional Research Service (CRS) published a report fear-mongering about the recently notified Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The three-page report titled: “Changes to India’s Citizenship Laws” asserted that the implementation of CAA would ‘violate’ certain Articles of the Indian constitution.

While the function of CRS is to provide objective, fact-based information to US Congress members, the report in question reeks of biasedness. The report, as expected, is taken up by the Western media, deeming the Modi government as a ‘Hindu nationalist’ one and Prime Minister Narendra Modi as a ‘Hindu nationalist’ leader. Asserting that India’s ‘Hindu nationalist’ government has, since 2014, worked on its Hindu nationalist policy goals including the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir and construction of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya.

CRS report insinuates violation of Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution in CAA

The CRS report said that the key provisions of the Citizenship Amendment Act would violate Articles 14 and 15 of the Indian constitution.

“The CAA’s key provisions—allowing immigrants of six religions from three countries a path to citizenship while excluding Muslims—may violate certain Articles of the Indian Constitution. Article 14: The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. Article 15: The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth, or any of them.”

Notably, the Modi government notified CAA on the 11th of March 2024. These rules, called the Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2024 will enable the persons eligible under CAA-2019 to apply for Indian citizenship on fast-track basis.

Under the CAA, people belonging to persecuted minority groups in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan—including Christians, Parsis, Jains, Buddhists, Hindus, and Sikhs—who came to India on or before December 31, 2014, will be granted Indian citizenship on a fast-track basis.

The CRS report says that while the Home Ministry called the CAA compassionate and humanitarian legislation, the ‘critics’ argue that for neighbouring countries like Sri Lanka, where Buddhism is ‘foremost’ and Tamil Hindus face persecution, CAA does not provide them a means to get Indian citizenship. Similarly, it says that in Myanmar, where Buddhism holds primacy, Rohingya Muslims face persecution, and Shias and Ahmadiyas facing persecution in Pakistan are also excluded from CAA. Citing these arguments posed by the unnamed ‘critics’, the CRS report makes a case that the CAA is ‘discriminatory’ and violates Article 14 (Equality before law) and Article 15 (Prohibition of discrimination) of the constitution.

Excerpt from CRS report

“India’s Home Ministry, which calls the CAA “compassionate and ameliorative legislation,” contends that the three specified countries have a state religion (Islam), resulting in the persecution of religious minorities. CAA advocates say that Muslims do not face persecution in Pakistan, Bangladesh, or Afghanistan, and they insist the act is constitutional because it addresses migrants rather than citizens. Critics point out that migrants from other neighbouring countries with state (or favored) religions, such as Sri Lanka (where Buddhism is “foremost” and Tamil Hindus face persecution) and Burma (where Buddhism enjoys primacy and Rohingya Muslims are persecuted), are excluded from a path to citizenship. Persecuted Muslim minority communities such as Pakistan’s Shias and Ahmadis also enjoy no protections under the CAA,” the CRS report reads.

Why are Shias and Ahmadiyas from Pakistan, Rohingyas from Burma and Tamil Hindus from Sri Lanka not included in CAA

Notably, despite facing discrimination, persecution, and other adversities, Shias and Ahmadiyas identify as Muslims. They continue to make up the Muslim majority in theocratic Islamic nations like Pakistan and Afghanistan. There is a distinction between sectarian violence and religiously motivated violence. Although India does not support discrimination against any community or religious group, the attacks Shias and Ahmadiyas face in Pakistan are law and order problems, hence they are not covered by the CAA.

Meanwhile, the reason behind excluding Rohingya Muslims from the CAA, is that the Rohingyas do not come to India directly, rather they go to Bangladesh and then illegally infiltrate into India from there. Since, Rohingyas are circumventing a safe haven in Bangladesh to reach India in search of material benefits, they are economic refugees in India, and no longer the persecuted religious minority.

Coming to why Tamil Hindus are not covered in the CAA, the CAA, as the government has often said, is meant to undo the historic wrong done to the minority groups following the partition in 1947 and does not include the linguistic criteria.

In an interview with Republic TV, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said: “In the case of Tamils in Sri Lanka, the Indian-origin Tamils were settled through negotiation. So, I think we cannot compare the Pakistan situation with the Sri Lanka situation. These are totally different.”

It is thus clear that unlike the assertions made in the CRS report, the CAA is neither discriminatory nor in violation of Articles 14 and 15. Article 14 guarantees every person the right to equality before the law and equal protection under the law on Indian territory. This assurance does not imply or mean absolute mathematical equality but allows the state to make appropriate classifications. The state has the authority to enact special laws for particular groups. The only condition is that this category and the object it represents are reasonably related. Further, the CAA does not bar anyone or in this case, Muslims from neighbouring countries from coming to India legally.

Furthermore, the Indian constitution defines the rights of Indian citizens, not refugees from other countries. Granting citizenship to refugees is totally up to the Indian government and requires no recommendation, concern, or interference from the US government, Congress, or any of its bodies.

Timing of CAA

The CRS report said that ‘observers’ note that the CAA was notified amidst the Lok Sabha election campaign and was meant to gain political advantage. However, contrary to the assertions made in the report, Union Home Minister Amit Shah had already said that the CAA brought in 2019 will be implemented before the 2024 elections.

In an interview last month, Minister Shah had said, “There is no question of timing. BJP said in its manifesto in 2019 that we will bring CAA and give citizenship to refugees from Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan…In 2019, it was passed by both Houses but got delayed due to Covid…The opposition wants to do appeasement politics and wants to consolidate their vote bank. They have been exposed and the people of the country know that CAA is the law of this country. I have said 41 times that it would be implemented before the elections.”

CRS and its history of bias

Notably, this is not the first time the Congressional Research Service has published a biased and motivated report concerning India. Back in 2018, CRS had published a report which blamed ‘Hindu nationalism’ for rising ‘intolerance’ in India. “Religious freedom is explicitly protected under its constitution. Hindus account for a vast majority (nearly four-fifths) of the country’s populace. Hindu nationalism has been a rising political force in recent decades, by many accounts eroding India’s secular nature and leading to new assaults on the country’s religious freedoms,” the report said.

The report relied on several leftist media outlets and cited people like S.M. Mushrif who had attended the inauguration event of the book, ’26/11: RSS ki Saazish?’. This book insinuates that the RSS conspired with the CIA and Mossad to perpetuate the horror in Mumbai.

It also had commented on the Anti-Conversion Law making assertions that conversion law has created a hostile atmosphere for Christian minorities. The CRS report, however, did not make any mention of the Muslim intolerance or the missionaries actively working to convert people to Christianity through deceptive and illegal means.

Another such biased report was published by the CRS in October last year, titled: India: Human Rights Assessments, in which it said the Hindu nationalist government is violating religious freedom alongside freedom of expression. The report cited several biased sources including US government-funded human rights ‘watchdog’  Freedom House, which had downgraded India from ‘Free’ to ‘Partly Free’ and had supported violent protests against CAA.

Like taking points from top teams in IPL and giving them to the bottom 3: Ex-Indian cricketer Venkatesh Prasad lambasts ‘pathetic’ wealth redistribution promise

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Like taking points from top teams in IPL and giving them to the bottom 3: Ex-Indian cricketer Venkatesh Prasad lambasts ‘pathetic’ wealth redistribution promise

Amidst intensifying criticism of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Wealth Redistribution’ promise, Former Cricketing veteran Venkateshwar Prasad on Monday (22nd April) slammed the thought process behind the idea as ‘pathetic’. Prasad explained the problem with the wealth redistribution promise by using an analogy from the Cricket field.  

In a sarcastic critique, Venkatesh Prasad likened the redistribution of wealth to the point system used in the ongoing Indian Premier League (IPL). He argued that the concept is akin to deducting points from the top-performing teams in the tournament, and redistributing them to the bottom three teams, alluding to the potential dampening effect on the competitive spirit and passion for the game among the players.

Without naming Congress directly, Prasad posted, “One of the political party’s manifesto is to redistribute the wealth of the rich to the poor. The really poor need to be uplifted but this thought process is so pathetic. It is like saying If we take 4 points from RR and 4 from KKR and SRH and re-distribute it to the bottom 3 teams, they can make the playoffs.” 

PM Modi lambasts Congress over Rahul Gandhi’s promises of ‘Wealth Redistribution’

Notably, on 6th April, Congress leader and I.N.D.I. Alliance’s possible PM Face for Lok Sabha Elections 2024, Rahul Gandhi, promised an ultra-left idea of ‘wealth redistribution’. He claims that it would eradicate poverty and socioeconomic inequality. Gandhi said if Congress (with the alliance parties) came to power, his party would conduct a financial and institutional survey to ascertain who had wealth in the country. He said the grand old party would then distribute the wealth to the backward castes and ‘minorities’ based on their population, based on caste census data.

During a public rally in Hyderabad, Rahul Gandhi, stressing the party’s “Jitni aabaadi utna haq” slogan, said, “We will first conduct a nationwide caste census to determine how many people belong to the Other Backward Classes (OBCs), Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs) and minorities. After that, we will conduct a financial and institutional survey in a historic step to ascertain the distribution of wealth.”

Yesterday, on 21st April, Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched a scathing attack on Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Wealth Redistribution’ promise during an election rally in Rajasthan’s Banswara. 

During his address, PM Modi slammed the Congress party over promising Wealth redistribution. He warned the voters that according to the Congress party’s announcement, if they form the government, gold, silver, ornaments like Mangalsutra, property, etc of Indians will be surveyed. PM Modi stressed that ‘Mangalsutra’ is more about their feelings and dreams than Gold. 

PM Modi emphasised, “They have said that if they form a government, then a survey of property belonging to every person will be done. It will be checked how much gold our sisters own, how much money government employees have…They also said that gold owned by our sisters would be equally distributed. Does govt have the right to take your property? ‘Mangalsutra’ sone ki keemat ka mudda nahi hai, unke sapno se juda hua hai…”

PM Modi recalled the infamous remark by then-PM Manmohan Singh where he argued that Muslims have the first right over resources. 

Highlighting the same, the Prime Minister added that this means, that after doing the wealth survey, Congress will distribute it to people who have more children, to illegal migrants, and to Muslims, for whom Manmohan Singh had said they had the first right over resources.

While the debate has become a political potboiler, the concept of wealth redistribution is associated with communist and socialist ideologies. In the past, it has been implemented in various forms, and most of the time, it has ended in economic and social disaster for those nations. Click here, to read about the historical precedences that highlight the inefficacy of this ultra-leftist idea. 

Congress and Islamists hurl abuses at PM Modi because he repeated exactly what Congress has promised to Muslims time and again

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Congress and Islamists hurl abuses at PM Modi because he repeated exactly what Congress has promised to Muslims time and again

On Sunday (April 21), Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched a sharp attack on the Congress party for embracing Rahul Gandhi’s ultra-leftist agenda of ‘wealth redistribution’. PM Modi stated that his election manifesto of the Congress party reflected Maoist ideology. During an election rally in Banswara, Rajasthan, PM Modi mentioned Rahul Gandhi’s promise to survey and share the country’s riches.

Speaking about then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s speech in which he claimed that Muslims ought to be given the first right to the nation’s resources, PM Modi stated that if the Congress heads back to power, they will redistribute the nation’s wealth among Muslims, intruders, and those with multiple children.

The Prime Minister’s address put Congress, Islamists, Leftists, and their media allies into a frenzy. Almost as soon as PM Modi delivered the address, a flurry of misinformation began to circulate claiming that the Prime Minister branded all Muslims in India as ‘Ghuspethiyas’ or ‘intruders’. Also, several Congress leaders and Islamists slammed PM Modi for speaking the truth out. 

On 22d April, former Karnataka Assembly Speaker K R Ramesh Kumar called PM Modi ‘Shani’, a planet which is often looked at as a malefic planet from the astrological lenses. “Modi is a shani which has gripped this country. We are waiting for June 4. We have prayed to God to rid the country of this Shani,” Ramesh Kumar said while campaigning in Rojarhalli village of Kolar taluk.

“It is unfortunate to see that the seat once occupied by Indira Gandhi, who boosted the self-confidence of people belonging to all castes and communities, including women, is now occupied by Modi,” he added. The video of the speech by Kumar is making rounds on social media.

The Congress party from its official platform posted several posts and videos calling PM Modi a liar. “PM Modi has a bad habit of lying. Once again, he was caught lying,” the X post by Congress read. Later, in another post, the Congress posted a caricature image of PM Modi and termed it a ‘face of lie’.

“The Prime Minister of India is a liar,” one of the posts by Congress read. Further, Congress leader Supriya Shrinate who earlier had made vulgar comments against Kangana Ranaut, BJP candidate from Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, abused PM Modi and called him shameless. She slammed PM Modi for saying that Congress will not even spare women’s wedding necklaces. “In which manifesto is it written that the party is going to do that? What are you even reading?” she blatantly asked.

The Congress in its manifesto said that everybody’s property would be surveyed and then the country’s riches would be shared. The property eventually would include traditional gold investments and ornaments owned by Indian families and women, which Shrinate probably forgot to understand.

In his speech on Sunday, PM Modi emphasised, “They have said that if they form a government then a survey of property belonging to every person will be done. It will be checked how much gold our sisters own, how much money government employees have…They also said that gold owned by our sisters would be equally distributed. Does the govt have the right to take your property? ‘Mangalsutra’ sone ki keemat ka mudda nahi hai, unke sapno se juda hua hai…”

Congress’ Rahul Gandhi also commented on the matter and didn’t hesitate to call PM Modi a liar. “After the disappointment in the first phase of voting, the level of Narendra Modi’s lies has fallen so much that out of fear, he now wants to divert the attention of the public from the issues. Trends have started coming in regarding the immense support that Congress’s ‘Revolutionary Manifesto’ is receiving. The country will now vote on its issues, vote for its employment, its family and its future. India will not go astray!” he said.

Further, notorious Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan who has a history of favouring the Congress party also posted a video of PM Modi, slamming him for speaking the truth. “When the elections seem to be slipping out of hand, they have to rant about Hindu-Muslim. The Election Commission will keep sleeping in the meantime,” Bhushan said.

Meanwhile, Congress’ Mallikarjun Kharge also commented on the issue and said, “What Modi ji said is not only a hate speech but also a well-thought-out ploy to divert attention. Today the Prime Minister did what he has learnt from the values ​​of the Sangh. Lying for power, making baseless references to things, and making false accusations about opponents are the specialties of the training of RSS and BJP. The 140 crore people of the country are no longer going to fall prey to this lie. Our manifesto is for every Indian. In the history of India, no Prime Minister has lowered the dignity of his post as much as Modiji has.”

Several Islamists who have a history of spreading hatred against the RSS and the BJP, and the Hindu community in general, also slammed PM Modi for peaking the truth about the Congress manifesto. Islamist ‘journalist’ Arfa Khanum Sherwani abused PM Modi and said that he only knew how to deliver hate speech.

Also, ‘journalist’ Ravish Kumar said, “PM’s politics is based on communal hatred. Even after ten years, he cannot give a speech without mentioning Muslims, the Muslim League, and fish.”

“This is also an insult to the majority community. It seems that the Prime Minister considers the majority community worthy of this. Their children will keep dying of unemployment and the Prime Minister will keep calling them Muslims and Muslims. Sad,” he added.

The list of Islamists who spread misinformation included self-proclaimed ‘fact-checker’ Mohammad Zubair of AltNews, who dog whistles against Hindus and spreads fake news to shield Islamists regularly.

Based on the tweet of Satish Acharya, who only makes cartoons when he has the opportunity to target PM Modi or Hindus, even Pakistani ‘journalist’ Hamid Mir claimed that PM Modi called all Indian Muslims infiltrators. He further hailed Satish Acharya for being a ‘brave journalist’.

Also, propagandist YouTuber Dhruv Rathee slammed PM Modi and said that the culmination of the first phase of the elections had sent PM Modi in shock. “All the fake propaganda from WhatsApp University has become part of his speeches now,” Rathee said.

AIMIM National President Asaduddin Owaisi also slammed PM Modi for allegedly ‘demeaning’ the Muslim community. “Modi today called Muslims infiltrators and people with many children. Since 2002 till this day, the only Modi guarantee has been to abuse Muslims and get votes. If one is talking about the country’s wealth, one should know that under Modi’s rule, the first right to India’s wealth has been of his wealthy friends. 1% of Indians own 40% of the country’s wealth. Common Hindus are made to fear Muslims while their wealth is being used to enrich others,” he said.

Addressing an election rally in Rajasthan’s Banswara, PM Modi on Sunday said, “Earlier, when they (the Congress) were in power, they had said Muslims have the first right to the wealth of the nation. This means they will distribute this wealth to those who have more children, to infiltrators. Should your hard-earned money be given to infiltrators? Do you agree to this?”

“Congress’s manifesto says they will take stock of the gold mothers and daughters have, and will distribute that wealth. Manmohan Singh’s government had said Muslims have the first right to wealth. Brothers and sisters, this Urban Naxal thinking will not spare even the mangal sutras of my mothers and sisters,” he added.

The Congress and Islamists slammed PM Modi for making such statements, the proof of which was published by the BJP hours after the PM’s speech. The BJP posted a video of a speech by former PM Manmohan Singh who in the year 2006 had said that Muslims must have the first claim on resources.

“We will have to devise innovative plans to ensure that minorities, particularly the Muslim minority, are empowered to share equitably in the fruits of development. They must have the first claim on resources,” Singh could be heard saying.

Not just former PM Manmohan Singh, but several other Congress leaders have been accused of indulging in minority appeasement as a means to cultivate a vote bank and shore up their electoral support.

PM Modi meanwhile also slammed the Congress party for appeasing illegal migrants such as Rohingyas and Bangladeshis who have illegally squatted in India for votes. The politics around the underway Lok Sabha Elections is becoming quite interesting with PM Modi exposing Congress’ evil side. The Congress already on the verge of ending is making all the efforts to defend itself and hide its evil face, but failing miserably.

The General elections in India which are underway are scheduled to be held in seven parts from April 19 to June 1, 2024, to elect 543 Lok Sabha members. The votes will be counted, and the results will be announced on June 4, 2024.

Who are you, United Nations? – Delhi High Court dismisses PIL seeking release of Arvind Kejriwal, imposes cost of Rs 75,000 on petitioner

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Who are you, United Nations? – Delhi High Court dismisses PIL seeking release of Arvind Kejriwal, imposes cost of Rs 75,000 on petitioner

On 22nd April, Delhi High Court dismissed PIL seeking Aam Aadmi Party supremo and Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal’s release on ‘extraordinary interim bail’. The court also imposed costs of Rs 75,000 on the petitioner while dismissing the case. The plea was submitted on behalf of the applicant by Advocate Karan Pal Singh, who happens to be the President of Naya Satta Party, a political party operating out of Delhi. Singh sough bail in all criminal charges registered by the Enforcement Directorate and the State till the completion of Kejriwal’s tenure as Chief Minister. In its order, the court pointed out that Arvind Kejriwal is in judicial custody by virtue of the court orders.

The plea was filed by a fourth-year law student under the name of “We the People of India”. The court said it was not maintainable as the courts in its writ jurisdiction cannot grant extraordinary interim bail in pending cases against a person holding high office.

Delhi High Court questioned applicant if he was member of the United Nations

The matter was heard by a bench led by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan. Notably, Advocate Rahul Mehra, appearing for Arvind Kejriwal opposed the plea submitted for Kejriwal’s release. Mehra called it “impermissible prayers” and called it “sorry state of affairs”. He also pointed out that the applicant’s father is the president of a political party and asserted he wanted to make the court a “political forum”.

Mehra informed the court that he is taking required steps in the matter which was told to the counsel of the applicant by the court. Furthermore, Rahul Mehra clearly pointed out that Kejriwal did not need any assistance from the applicant in the matter.

The court asked the applicant “Who are you to help him? How do you get a veto power? Are you a member of the United Nations?”

Counsel appearing for the applicant claimed that due to the arrest of Kejriwal, the entire government has stopped working in Delhi as CM is the head of the government. He further pointed out that there were reports that there was shortage of medicines in the hospitals that come under Delhi Government.

When pointed out that Singh is founder of a political party, the counsel claimed that his party was not participating in any elections. He added, “My only concern is that 3 crore people of Delhi in which 1.59 crore people are registered voters… what about their children, their education and medicine.”

The court dismissed the case and imposed costs of Rs 75,000. The court said, “This court is of the view that the present petition is not maintainable as R5 is in judicial custody in pursuance to the judicial orders which have not been challenged in the present petition. Further, this court in writ jurisdiction cannot grant extraordinary interim bail in a pending criminal case initiated against a person holding high office.”

The court added that “it is important to remember the principles of equality enshrined in the constitution and the basic rule of law be ever so high, the law is above you. This is imperative to retain public confidence in the constitution of India.”

The court said, “The court is in view that the petitioner’s claim of being custodian of people is devoid of any basis”, and he holds no power of attorney on behalf of Kejriwal to furnish any personal bond. Furthermore, the court pointed out that Kejriwal has the means and wherewithal to file the case which has already been done.

The Delhi High Court added that all the submissions mentioned in the plea have already been dealt with by the Delhi High Court.

Arrest of Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal

On 21st March, ED went to Arvind Kejriwal’s residence in the evening for questioning. Later, he was arrested by the investigating agency in the Delhi Excise Policy Scam. Kejriwal was presented in the court the next day where ED got his custody. AAP has claimed that Kejriwal’s arrest was politically motivated and illegal. However, his appeal in the court for interim relief was rejected.

Delhi Excise Policy Scam

In November 2021, the Delhi Government introduced a new liquor policy. In June 2022, the Delhi Pradesh Congress Committee filed a complaint against the new Delhi Excise policy. In July 2022, the Chief Secretary of Delhi flagged the anomalies in it. Delhi LG requested CBI to initiate a probe and ED joined the investigation by registering the matter under PMLA. Since then, multiple arrests have been made, including Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal and his former deputy Manish Sisodia.

Jharkhand: Muslims threaten to boycott Congress and vote in favour of BJP over the lack of representation in LS polls

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Jharkhand: Muslims threaten to boycott Congress and vote in favour of BJP over the lack of representation in LS polls

In yet another blow to the Congress party, the Muslim community in Jharkhand has decided not to vote for Congress candidate Krishna Nand Tripathi. They threatened a boycott against Congress over the lack of representation from their community.

They sought that candidates from the Muslim community contest for at least four seats in the state including the Chatra, Godda, Koderma, and Giridih, or else they would not vote for the Congress candidate. 

Mahagathbandhan, commonly referred to as the Grand Alliance, is a political party coalition in India’s eastern state of Jharkhand that was created right before the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. The alliance includes parties like the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha, the Indian National Congress, the Rashtriya Janata Dal, the Nationalist Congress Party, and the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist Liberation).

The Chatra Lok Sabha constituency has five assembly seats namely Latehar, Manika, Panki, Chhatra, and Dumariya. Notably, BJP candidate Kalicharan Singh is making concerted efforts to connect to voters from all backgrounds with an enthusiastic campaign. A month ago, the BJP candidate received a grand welcome from the Muslim community days after the party announced his candidature for the upcoming Lok Sabha Elections.

The resistance from the Muslim minority, which accounts for 20% of the population in the Chatra constituency, will likely only worsen Congress candidate Tripathi’s problems. The Congress party on 16th April announced another list of three candidates in Jharkhand for the upcoming Lok Sabha elections. The party fielded Deepika Pandey Singh from Godda, Krishna Nand Tripathi from Chatra, and Anupama Singh from Dhanbad.

The people from the Muslim community then raised an objection saying that though Chatra is a constituency that has more Muslim voters, the Mahagathbandhan decided to field a Hindu candidate.

On Saturday (19th April), Muslim intellectuals had a meeting to discuss the topic and expressed their decision to field their candidate or host a public gathering to decide whether to vote for the BJP.

During the meeting, the intellectuals said that the Congress Party should stop making the mistake of taking Muslims of Chatra for granted. “Now Muslims have completely awakened. Under any circumstances, the candidates of the Congress Party and Grand Alliance will not be able to take the votes of Muslims by showing fear of the BJP,” they said.

“Our population in Jharkhand is second after the tribals. We have represented Godda and Dhanbad and other Lok Sabha constituencies many times with 20% population. Despite this, the Grand Alliance did not consider a Muslim candidate for even one of the 14 seats, which is unfortunate,” they added.

The Muslim leaders also stated that, despite having a 20% Muslim population, the Grand Alliance had failed to field a Muslim contender for any of Jharkhand’s 14 seats. Tripathi is also experiencing opposition from within the RJD, with some workers protesting the high command’s choice to support him.

India will hold general elections in seven parts from April 19 to June 1, 2024, to elect 543 Lok Sabha members. The votes will be counted, and the results will be announced on June 4, 2024.

PM Modi warns against Rahul Gandhi’s wealth redistribution plans: Understanding the cleverly worded hints in Congress manifesto

Anurag
-
0
PM Modi warns against Rahul Gandhi’s wealth redistribution plans: Understanding the cleverly worded hints in Congress manifesto

On 21st April, Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched an attack on the opposition, especially the Congress Party amid the ongoing Lok Sabha Elections 2024. In his address at a public meeting in Rajasthan, PM Modi pointed out Congress plans to do an economic survey to find out who owns how much wealth and asserted it will be redistributed to Muslims, particularly the infiltrators.

PM Modi warned that the Congress Party plans to take away the wealth of poor families and would not even leave the Mangalsutra of married women. Evidently, Congress, left, liberals and Islamists got rattled by PM Modi’s statement and started calling it fearmongering, divisive politics and whatnot. Notably, PM Modi pointed out that it was written in the manifesto that the Congress Party would do all these things and if one carefully reads the manifesto, his warning is backed by evidence.

First of all, it is essential to note that since former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh claimed minorities, particularly Muslims, have the first right to the resources of the country, the Congress Party has faced a lot of backlashes. Singh’s statement from 2006 comes back to haunt the grand old party more often than it can digest. Media houses like The Lallantop tried to twist what Singh said in his statement claiming his words were misinterpreted but the truth comes out much easier with access to videos and text of the statement.

Ahead of the Lok Sabha Elections 2024, Congress leader and possibly grand old party’s PM Face, Rahul Gandhi, launched a project to woo SC/ST/OBC communities. He has promised to do a caste census and socio-economic survey to understand “where the wealth” of the country is “stored”. Though the Congress manifesto does not talk directly about wealth redistribution, Gandhi has repeatedly and openly propagated the idea. On 6th April, during a rally at Hyderabad, Rahul Gandhi, stressing on the party’s “Jitni aabaadi utna haq” slogan and said, “We will first conduct a nationwide caste census to determine how many people belong to the Other Backward Classes (OBCs), Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs) and minorities. After that, we will conduct a financial and institutional survey in a historic step to ascertain the distribution of wealth.”

Furthermore, there are sections and sub-sections in the manifesto that hint towards the sinister plan. As we discuss the Congress manifesto, it is essential to understand that Congress has been very careful about using specific words in the document, especially Muslims. Interestingly, the word “Muslim” did not come even once in the manifesto. As a matter of fact, they did not use any words like Hindu, Christian or others. The same goes with other parties as they also avoid using direct reference to religion, most probably due to the Model Code of Conduct (MCC).

However, there are other ways to differentiate between minorities of the Hindu community and other minorities in the country. For instance, Congress used caste, SC/ST and similar words or phrases to talk about minorities in the Hindu community. However, in other sections, it used an umbrella term “minorities”. It is a fact, which was clear by Singh’s 2006 statement, that when it comes to “minorities”, Congress prefer Muslims.

Now coming to the manifesto. Under the Section Equity on page 5 of the manifesto, the first point reads, “Congress will conduct a nationwide Socio-Economic and Caste Census to enumerate the castes and sub-castes and their socio-economic conditions. Based on the data, we will strengthen the agenda for affirmative action.” This is the first, open “hint” that Congress is all set to find out who owns how much wealth.

Source: Congress Manifesto for Lok Sabha Elections 2024

Notably, Congress never mentioned how it would work. Rahul Gandhi simply said in his statement that it would be redistributed among those who do not have wealth. Interestingly, Gandhi or Congress did not explain what would be counted as wealth. Is the gold that families own would be counted? What about the family jewellery? What about the inherited property of the middle class the lower middle class or the poor families? There is always someone poorer in the society. What would Congress take away and to what extent?

Gandhi in his statement on wealth redistribution simply said “It will be redistributed”. However, he did not explain the process or anything related to it leaving a major loophole in the system they are planning to bring.

Now coming to the section “Religious And Linguistic Minorities”, sub-section 5 read, “The economic empowerment of minorities is a necessary step for India to realise its full potential. We will ensure that banks will provide institutional credit to minorities without discrimination.”

Here comes the interesting part. To understand Congress’s plan, we have to go back to Singh’s 2006 statement again. He had said, “We will have to devise innovative plans to ensure that minorities, particularly the Muslim minority, are empowered to share equitably in the fruits of development. They must have the first claim on resources.” Congress thrived on appeasement politics for decades. From the Waqf Board to the Places of Worship Act or flipping the Supreme Court’s decision in the Triple Talaq matter by Rajiv Gandhi, the grand old party left no stone unturned to make the policies Muslim-centric.

Source: Congress Manifesto for Lok Sabha Elections 2024

In India, when most of the opposition parties talk about minorities, they talk about Muslims. Even though Muslims are the second largest part of the population and communities like Jain, Sikh and Christians among others are the true minorities, appeasement politics thrives exponentially under Congress rule.

Congress also wants to abolish the cap of 50% in reservations. There is a strong possibility that Congress will take one step ahead and introduce Muslims under SC/ST and OBC communities to give them reservations as direct reservations to Muslims often draw criticism. In short, Muslims are the largest religious minority group. If Congress is talking about religious minorities, in most probability the benefits will go to Muslims.

Source: Congress Manifesto for Lok Sabha Elections 2024

Again, under the same section, sub-section 6, it reads, “We will ensure that the minorities receive their fair share of opportunities in education, healthcare, public employment, public works contracts, skill development, sports and cultural activities without discrimination.”

It makes Congress’s plan clearer. The fair share directly hints towards increasing reservations in different sectors. Congress has a history of taking shortcuts and if anyone believes Congress will develop infrastructure to eliminate the root cause of discrimination, they won’t. The easiest way out here is to announce reservations in the abovementioned sectors.

While merit should be prioritised in all sectors, appeasement politics never let it happen. Lok Sabha Elections 2024’s results are almost 1.5 months away. Remember, wealth redistribution is a well-tried formula that has failed miserably worldwide.

1...1,0961,0971,098...7,603Page 1,097 of 7,603