Home Blog Page 1937

NIA attaches 3 properties in terror-gangster-drug smuggler nexus case

0

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) attached three properties owned by members of Organised Crime Syndicates in Haryana and Delhi on Tuesday.

This came after multi-state raids were conducted across 129 locations as part of its continuing offensive against the terrorist-gangster-drug smuggler network, having links with ‘listed individual terrorist’ Arsh Dala and other foreign-based terrorists.

The raids were conducted at locations linked with gangsters and their associates in Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Gujarat and Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) on May 17 this year.

The properties attached include a house of Irfan alias Chhenu Pehalwan in Delhi and two houses belonging to Kaushal Chaudhary and Amit Dagar in the Gurugram district of Haryana, the agency said on Tuesday, adding “all these properties constituted ‘proceeds of terrorism’, which were used for hatching terror conspiracies and execution of crimes”.

As per NIA investigations, Irfan had been involved in multiple criminal cases of murder and extortion, besides being a supplier of all types of logistics support, including men and material (supply of arms and ammunition), to the notorious Bambiha gang.

“Irfan had provided a safe haven to the gang’s absconding associates on the instructions of Kaushal Chaudhary, Bhupi Rana and other key operatives of the gang to reach out to the ground level operatives for the execution of terror and criminal activities,” the NIA said.

The other two, Kaushal Choudhary and Amit Dagar were closely associated with key conspirators-foreign-based Arshdeep Dala and Gaurab Patyal alias Sourav Thakur alias Lucky, with the help of other accused persons.

Both Kaushal and Amit were involved in extortion, threatening and killing of businessmen and striking terror among singers, businessmen and sportspersons, as well as in arranging weapons for the execution of acts of terror and violence.

“They were both in touch with and conspired with foreign-based terrorists, as well as ground operatives, through social media platforms for execution of extortion and killing terror activities. The money raised from the extortions was being utilised for furtherance of terror activities and for providing logistic support to other gangs, including the Bambiha gang, active in India,” said the NIA.

The NIA registered cases against three major Organised Crime Syndicates under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in August last year.

These syndicates were spreading their mafia-style criminal networks in the northern states of India and were involved in the commission of many sensational crimes, such as the murder of popular singer Sidhu Moosewala. and large-scale extortions from businessmen and professionals.

Their crimes included the killing of Maharashtra builder Sanjay Biyani, as well as Sandeep Nangal Ambia, an international Kabbadi organiser in Punjab, the NIA said.

“Many of these conspiracies were found to have been masterminded from abroad, including Pakistan and Canada, or by leaders of Organised Criminal Syndicates lodged in jails,” it added.

The NIA also said it has planned to intensify its drive, in active and close collaboration with police forces of various states to dismantle such terror and mafia networks and their support infrastructure and to attach and seize their assets procured from ‘proceeds of terrorism and crime’.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Pune: Shopkeeper Kaif Karimullah Sheikh molests 20-year-old woman under the guise of ‘helping’ her check size of garments, booked

An outrageous incident recently occurred in the MG Road area of the city where a young women aged around 20 was molested by a shopkeeper identified as Kaif Karimullah Sheikh (24). The Pune Police has taken the cognizance of the incident and has filed an FIR in the case.

In the past few days, the issue of women’s safety has become a serious matter in Pune, especially after a college girl was attacked in broad daylight in the Sadashiv Peth area. According to the local reports, this recent incident is said to have happened in the cantonment area of the city. A 20-year-old college girl was molested by Sheikh while she visited his shop on MG Road to get her trousers exchanged. The accused molested the victim girl and touched her inappropriately as he offered to ‘help’ her check the size of the clothing.

Reportedly, the shop in which the girl was molested is located in the Nath Chowk area on MG road in the Pune Cantonment region. Sheikh, who has been identified as the accused works as an attendant at the shop. The incident happened on July 20 at around 1:10 pm. The girl was molested as she attempted to try the T-shirt she wanted to pay for. “I’ll help you wear the T-shirt,” said Sheikh as he offered to ‘help’ the girl check the size before the purchase.

The accused then attempted to sexually assault her and he also touched her inappropriately. The 20-year-old victim pushed the accused and managed to escape from the spot. She then called her brother for help who reached there with some of his friends. The brother of the victim further is said to have thrashed the accused for molesting the girl.

The victim girl later filed a police complaint at the Camp area police station. Accordingly, a case has been registered against the accused, identified as Kaif Karimmullah Sheikh. The FIR has been registered under section 354 of the IPC. Also, a cross FIR has been registered against the brother of the victim girl for thrashing the accused. The police confirmed the event and said that the notices have been issued to both the parties and that the investigation in the case is underway.

Confirming the incident, Police Sub-Inspector Shekhar Mokate stated, “The woman, who resides in Swargate, has been a regular patron of the shop for the past two years. On Wednesday, she visited the shop to get her purchased trousers replaced.”

According to the Police, upon her arrival at the shop, the owner informed her about the arrival of a new stock of T-shirts and inquired if she was interested in purchasing one. The woman decided to take a look at some of these T-shirts and chose one to try on. She alleged that while ostensibly demonstrating how to wear the T-shirt, the owner touched her inappropriately.

Following the incident, the woman reacted by pushing the shop owner away and immediately recounted the ordeal to her brother over the phone. Without delay, the brother arrived at the shop accompanied by a friend, and a heated verbal confrontation ensued. Subsequently, they physically assaulted the shop owner. Mokate further stated, “The surveillance footage from outside the shop shows the brother striking the owner repeatedly with a stick on his head and neck, while his friend also joined in the attack.”

Crimes against women in Pune

Several crimes against women have recently been reported from Pune raising the alarm of women safety in the city. In June this year, a 20-year-old college student was attacked with a machete by a 21-year-old youth in the Sadashiv Peth area after she had ended a relationship with him given his abusive behavior.

Also, a brutal case of Love Jihad was reported from the Manchar region of Pune in which a Hindu minor girl was abducted, raped and assaulted by one Javed Sheikh. The girl was rescued after 4 years and was scared so much so that she even refused to identify and go close to her father. The girl during the period of 4 years was tortured, assaulted and given the bruises of lit cigarettes.

The Police then had arrested the accused and booked him under sections 363 (kidnapping) and 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code and sections 4, 6, 8, 10 of the POCSO Act. Further investigations are underway.

In the current case the FIR against the accused worker identified as Kaif Karimullah Sheikh has been registered under section 354 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Further investigations in the case are underway.

China sacks ‘missing’ foreign minister Qin Gang, replaces him with his predecessor Wang Yi

Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang was dismissed from his position and succeeded by former Foreign Minister Wang Yi, state media reported on Tuesday.

The reports did not disclose any specific reasons for Qin’s removal, but it was mentioned that President Xi Jinping signed a presidential order to formalize this decision.

State media outlet Xinhua reported that during a session convened on Tuesday, China’s top legislature voted to appoint Wang Yi as the new foreign minister. Simultaneously, it was announced that Qin Gang had been removed from the post of foreign minister.

Qin Gang ‘missing’ since June 25

Since his meeting with Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko in Beijing on June 25, Qin has not made any public appearances. Notably, he was absent from an international diplomatic summit in Indonesia, and China’s Foreign Affairs Ministry attributed his nonattendance to unspecified health issues.

The lack of clarity surrounding Qin’s current location has sparked speculation regarding potential disagreements with Chinese leadership or the possibility of him being under official investigation. On Tuesday, the Foreign Ministry asserted that it had no information to disclose regarding Qin’s status.

It is important to note that China’s Communist Party is well-known for its opaque approach to internal personnel matters, and media freedom and free speech are severely restricted in the country.

Wang Yi returns as Chinese foreign minister

Having held the position of the leader of the Communist Party’s foreign affairs commission, Wang holds a higher rank than Qin in China’s government hierarchy. For the past month, Wang has been handling Qin’s responsibilities. Wang previously served as the foreign minister from 2018 to 2022.

This reshuffling in diplomatic roles comes amidst efforts by China and the US to mend their strained relationship, which has been marked by disagreements on various issues such as trade, human rights, technology, Taiwan, and territorial claims made by Beijing. In recent times, senior Chinese diplomats have also visited European countries in an attempt to improve relations.

However, Qin’s absence at the top of China’s foreign ministry has created a void. As a consequence, the planned visit to Beijing by the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, had to be called off. Furthermore, UK Foreign Secretary James Cleverly also postponed his visit to Beijing this month due to Qin’s unavailability, as reported by Bloomberg on Friday.

Multivalent meningococcal meningitis vaccine from Serum Institute of India gets WHO prequalification, to be used in Africa

0

MenFive, the first conjugate vaccine to protect against the five predominant causes of meningococcal meningitis in Africa, has been prequalified by the World Health Organization (WHO).

According to Adar Poonawalla, CEO, Serum Institute of India, MenFive is a game changer vaccine, “MenFive is a game-changer vaccine developed through a powerful 13-year collaboration between Serum Institute of India Private Limited (SIIPL), PATH, and vital support from the UK government, in the fight against meningococcal meningitis in Africa.” PATH is a global nonprofit dedicated to achieving health equity.

“As the first conjugate vaccine to safeguard against the five predominant causes of this deadly disease, MenFive offers hope for a future free from annual outbreaks and epidemics in the African meningitis belt. It is a big moment as we, together, pave the way towards a healthier Africa, saving countless lives,” Poonawala said.

“MenFive is a much-required medical intervention that will be available at an extremely affordable price”, said Dr Rajeev Dhere, Executive Director of SIIPL.

“The prequalification of MenFive represents a turning point for the African meningitis belt and a step forward in the global effort to Defeat Meningitis by 2030,” says Dr Bill Hausdorff, director of PATH’s meningitis vaccine development projects.

“The introduction of new multivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines is a key strategy for bacterial meningitis prevention and control. MenFive is a critical addition to the toolbox that will save thousands of lives every year,” he added.

WHO prequalification—which ensures a vaccine meets strict international quality, safety, and efficacy standards—was supported by extensive clinical studies in The Gambia, India, and Mali that demonstrated a high level of safety and immunogenicity. Importantly, prequalification allows MenFive to be procured by United Nations agencies and Gavi, The Vaccine Alliance.

Meningococcal meningitis is a bacterial infection that sets in rapidly and can kill within hours. It can cause severe brain damage and sepsis leading to limb amputation and is fatal in 50% of cases if untreated. Anyone can contract meningococcal meningitis but children under age five—especially infants—are likely to suffer the most severe effects.

Polysaccharide vaccines have traditionally been used in response to African meningitis epidemics, but they have limitations. They only provide short-term protection, don’t promote herd immunity and are not generally effective in infants and children younger than two years of age. Conjugate vaccines provide better, longer-lasting protection against meningococcal disease.

Multivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines that protect against serogroup A, C, W, and Y have been available on the global market for decades, but they aren’t affordable for meningitis belt countries to include in their meningitis prevention strategies—leaving 450 million people at risk of death or severe disability due to meningococcal disease.

“MenFive is currently undergoing an additional Phase 3 study in healthy children between 9 and 15 months of age in Mali, to examine MenFive’s safety and immunogenicity when administered alongside measles/rubella and yellow fever vaccine. The study is being conducted by the Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Consortium in collaboration with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health,” reads the statement. 

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

My “Red Diary” contains all the information about corruption in Rajasthan under Ashok Gehlot government: Sacked Congress minister Rajendra Gudha

Rajendra Singh Gudha, who was sacked as a minster by the Congress government in Rajasthan recently, has since made some startling accusations about the rampant corruption in the Ashok Gehlot-led government in the state. The Udaipurwati MLA has repeatedly made references to a “red diary” that allegedly contains information allegedly exposing corruption in Rajasthan and implicating even the Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot.

Gudha was physically stopped from presenting this “Red Diary” in the state assembly that he says exposes the corruption in the state. On Monday, July 24, he was physically stopped by Congress lawmakers from talking about this red diary in the state assembly. This came just days after he was sacked by the Congress party for talking about the atrocities against the women in the state. 

Later, in an extraordinary move, House Marshalls forbade Gudha from even entering the Assembly building. He was then suspended along with BJP MLA Madan Dilawar for the duration of the monsoon session. Gudha asserted that this was done to stop him from presenting this “red diary”.

Gudha while talking to the media on July 24 said that he wanted to give a statement on the red diary but the speaker did not allow it. “Shanti Dhariwal stood to speak and I went to him and said that I want to give a statement in the House, but Congress MLAs pushed me to the ground and overpowered me. Some of them including Shanti Dhariwal kicked me and snatched the diary from me. However, some part of the diary was left with me,” he said.

What is in that ‘Red Diary’ of Rajendra Gudha?

Rajendra Gudha claims that the red diary is jam-packed with facts and proof of Ashok Gehlot and his son’s wrongdoings during Gehlot’s term as the chief minister of Rajasthan. The infamous “Red Diary,” according to Gudha, has a number of ominous secrets that could pose problems for the Gehlot administration.

According to Gudha’s assertions, Dharmendra Rathore, currently Chairman of the Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation, wrote the book. Gudha is of the opinion that the diary includes all financial dealings and donations made to MLAs throughout the elections.

Gudha said that the diary was secured by him during an income tax raid at the residence of RTDC chairman Dharmendra Rathore as per the instructions of CM Ashok Gehlot.

Crying before the media yesterday, Gudha also said that he does not fear going to jail. He accepted that he secured the diary from Rathore’s residence to save the political power of CM Ashok Gehlot. “I saved him. I admired Gehlot as my leader. He asked me to get the diary containing all the details of the ill transactions. I did it all for him. And now the government is not allowing me in,” he said.

Gudha says he will drag CM to jail

Rajendra Gudha also said that Gehlot had asked him to burn and destroy the diary but that didn’t happen. “I am accusing the government of fraud and that is true. I know what I am saying. If I am wrong, put me in jail or kill me. Half of the Ministers in the Ashok Gehlot government are corrupt and involved in criminal cases and deserve to be in jail,” he said.

Gudha meanwhile cleared that he was not desperate for becoming the Minister and that if he is sent to jail, he will take CM Ashok Gehlot with him to the jail.

Rajasthan government sacked Gudha for criticising the state over crimes against women

Notably, Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot recently sacked Congress’ Rajendra Gudha as a minister in his government for commenting and criticising the state government over crimes against women. Gudha questioned his own government’s efforts to combat crimes against women in Rajasthan while his colleagues condemned the violence in Manipur.

Congress legislators raised placards in protest of the violence in Manipur during the consideration of the Rajasthan Minimum Income Guarantee Bill 2023 in the state Assembly, but Gudha did not appreciate the protest and wanted accountability from his own administration for atrocities committed against women.

“The way we have failed to provide security to women in Rajasthan and atrocities on women have increased, instead of raising the issue of Manipur, we should introspect,” Gudha said in the state assembly.

He also reiterated his statement on July 23 saying that “Rajasthan is number one when it comes to crime against women.”

Delhi Court asks trial court to decide over bail plea of Delhi anti-Hindu riots accused Shahrukh Pathan, who had pulled a gun at a police constable

Shahrukh Pathan, who was captured during the 2020 anti-Hindu Delhi riots brandishing a gun at a Police constable, was directed by the Delhi High Court on Monday to submit a new bail application to the trial court.

Pathan was asked to reapply for bail before the trial court by a single-judge bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma.“This court requests the trial court to dispose of the bail application within one month,” the HC said.

He was charged with an FIR (49/2020) at the Jafrabad police station in 2020 for rioting, being equipped with a dangerous weapon, engaging in an unlawful assembly, and attempting to murder an individual.

Pathan’s attorney claimed that since some crucial prosecution witnesses had been questioned after his earlier bail application was denied, the situation had changed. He also sought to withdraw his pending bail application from the high court in order to go to the trial court for support. He further stated that Pathan’s bail application had been pending before the HC since January 2022.

Additionally, Pathan’s attorney claimed that there were no eyewitnesses and that only ‘circumstantial evidence’ had been used to prove the case against him. “There is no CCTV footage of the incident. All those people named in the FIR and those who have been identified are out on bail. This entire case is motivated and fabricated, they have planted witnesses,” he claimed.

Pathan had been ‘languishing’ in jail for about three and a half years, he continued.

On the other hand, the lawyer for the Delhi police cited Pathan’s behaviour when he was imprisoned and said that there has been a time when a cell phone was found from him and he also assaulted the jail’s assistant superintendent. “There has been an occasion where a mobile phone was found on him. There has been an occasion where he attacked the assistant superintendent of jail… All other accused were found in their homes. This accused absconds, was arrested on March 3, 2020 from Shamli, Uttar Pradesh, after a large search operation.”

Pathan was denied bail by the trial court in December 2021. He then moved the High Court in January 2022 seeking bail.

Accused Shahrukh Pathan was arrested in the year 2020 on the charges of opening fire at the Delhi Police officials and inciting riots in the national capital during the Anti-Hindu riots. He has been charged in two cases. He has been booked under rioting and relevant sections for allegedly pointing a gun at head constable Deepak Dahiya during the riots on February 24, 2020. His name is also included in a charge sheet in connection with the Maujpur incident on February 24, where violence erupted between pro-CAA and anti-CAA groups and later spread to other parts of Northeast Delhi.

CCTV videos of head constable Deepak Dahiya standing resolute on duty, fearlessly facing the criminal Shahrukh who fired bullets at him had gone viral on social media.

Two policemen named Raman and Deepak and a passerby Rohit Shukla had sustained injuries because of the violence that had broken out at Maujpur Chowk on February 24. Shukla had then confirmed that there were two groups of people, one of which was shouting ‘Allah­hu­Akbar’ and protesting against CAA and NRC.

The Delhi Court had later ordered an FIR against Pathan and booked him under Sections 147 (rioting), 148 (rioting armed with a weapon), 149 (unlawful assembly), 186 (obstructing public servant in discharge of public functions), 188 (disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant), 153A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, etc.), 283 (danger or obstruction in public way or line of navigation), 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty), 332 (Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 307 (murder attempt), 505, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code along with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Scratch your memory, sir: Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar fumes after P Chidambaram challenges the Chair on Rajya Sabha rules

On Tuesday (July 25), Vice-President and Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar objected to the remarks made by Congress leader P Chidambaram with respect to the rules governing the proceedings of the Upper House.

The veteran Congress MP had accused Jagdeep Dhankhar of not admitting 50+ motions on Manipur violence under Rule 267 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of States.

“Mr P Chidambaram raised this issue, with his own experience of having got into Parliament in mid 80s. I was a little surprised and stunned when he said ‘How can you do it?’ It came from a man of experience, who held senior positions in the Cabinet,” the Vice-President emphasised.

“How can the Chairman do it, he said. I will appeal to him to look into the rationale as to why I have done it. I am sure you will find a way out of it. But, such kind of extreme, intemperate, inappropriate expression for the Chair, emanating from such a senior member, surely is not wholesome,” he pointed out.

In his defence, P Chidambaram claimed that he did not challenge the authority of the Rajya Sabha Chairman. He asked, “You have rightly said that Rule 267 motion will take precedence over any other rule. Having said that, there are 51 fresh motions today. How can they be overruled by something that happened 3 days ago under Rule 176?”

The Congress MP then claimed, “You are contradicting yourself. How can you do that? Please look at the entire thing.” Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar intervened and said, “First, you directly challenged the Chair and said ‘How can you do it?’ This is number one (point).”

He added, “Sir, you were in governance for 10 years preceding this. Have you seen 50 motions earlier under Rule 267? Scratch your memory…On (the issue of) Manipur, I have already accepted the notice in accordance with Rule 176. The Minister has spontaneously agreed to a discussion.”

What do the Rules say?

The Rule 267 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Council of States, says, “Any member, may, with the consent of the Chairman, move that any rule may be suspended in its application to a motion related to the business listed before the Council of that day and if the motion is carried, the rule in question shall be suspended for the time being: Provided further that this rule shall not apply where specific provision already exists for suspension of a rule under a particular chapter of the Rules.”

Thus, Rule 267 deals with the suspension of other Rules of the House. On the contrary, Rule 176 states, “Any member desirous of raising discussion on a matter of urgent public importance may give notice in writing to the Secretary-General specifying clearly and precisely the matter to be raised: Provided that the notice shall be accompanied by an explanatory note stating reasons for raising discussion on the matter in question: Provided further that the notice shall be supported by the signatures of at least two other members.”

Thus, Rule 176 deals with short discussions, less than 2.5 hours long, on matter of urgent public importance.

Jagdeep Dhankhar tells AAP MP Sanjay Singh to ‘keep silence’

On Friday (July 21), Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar reprimanded Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Sanjay Singh for interrupting his address during the monsoon session of the Rajya Sabha.

“I give time to everyone in accordance with rules. This House is the upper House, the House of Elders. Our conduct is being watched by more than 1.3 billion people. We have to exemplify our conduct so that we can be appreciated,” he urged the members of the Rajya Sabha to maintain decorum.

At that point, the Vice-President was interrupted by Sanjay Singh, who claimed, “The whole country is seeing your conduct.” Jagdeep Dhankhar then directed the AAP leader to behave himself.

“Can you keep quiet for a moment? It has become your habit to rise and raise a point. I give time, every time,” he emphasised.

The Vice-President, who serves as the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha told Sanjay Singh, “It is not a public street. It is not a platform. Keep your silence, please. No.”

Bengal: Madrasa teacher Faizuddin Mollah rapes and locks a minor student inside school washroom, arrested under POCSO Act

On Monday, 24 July, the Dholaghat police arrested a teacher for allegedly raping and assaulting a minor girl. Reportedly, the teacher raped the minor girl inside the school premises in South 24 Pargana district. The accused was later identified as Faizuddin Mollah associated with the Dholahat High Madrasa. 

According to a report in India today, the incident took place on Friday, the 21st of July. The accused teacher Mollah followed the minor victim to the toilet and raped her. When the victim cried for help, he physically assaulted and locked her inside a washroom.

Afterward, the minor victim was rescued by her friends and subsequently, they informed her mother about the incident. The victim’s family have blamed the school administration for not taking cognizance of the crime. 

The family also alleged that local leaders of the Trinamool Congress (TMC) threatened them and asked them to remain silent on the issue and not speak about the matter. 

The victim’s mother stated, “Mollah hung a lock outside the toilet and left my daughter. On reaching there, I enquired as to why she was left in such a condition. The school administration was ignorant.”  

Later, on Sunday, 23rd of July, the victim’s family filed a complaint at the Dholahat police station. After getting the complaint, the police filed a case under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. Subsequently, on Monday evening, 24 July, they arrested the accused Mollah, and produced him before the Kakdwip Sub-Divisional Court.

Following the family’s allegation against local leaders’ of TMC, BJP raised the issue and demanded Justice for the minor victim. BJP’s district Juba Morcha secretary Mahabrata Das stated that this kind of incident is happening in Maldah while Trinamool Congress is preoccupied with Manipur.

However, TMC’s local cadre came out to reject all these allegations. TMC’s Kakdwip block vice-president Satyabrata Maiti claimed that no TMC worker is involved in this heinous crime. 

Maiti said, “I have heard the whole incident. No one from Trinamool is involved in it. What is being said is false. I am demanding an inquiry.”

The investigation is still ongoing and Police said that they are waiting for the medical report to proceed further. 

SC refuses urgent hearing on plea against ban on SIMI: All you need to know about the terrorist outfit

On Tuesday, July 25, the Supreme Court of India refused an urgent hearing on a batch of pleas against a ban imposed on the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI).

The bench of Justices SK Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia instructed the attorney who requested the matter be listed to approach the court after the hearing on the matter of Article 370 of the Constitution is completed.

The attorney informed the bench that the case was scheduled for hearing on January 18 but has not been listed since.

To this the bench said, “Next week, hearing in the Constitution bench (on Article 370) is starting. Mention it after it is over.” 

Center says SIMI wanted to establish Islamic rule in India

Notably, in January this year, the central government filed an affidavit in the apex court wherein it said that the objective of the outlawed Student Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) is to establish Islamic rule in India cannot be allowed to subsist and that the activists of the banned outfit are still indulging in disruptive activities that are capable of threatening the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

The affidavit was submitted in response to a petition contesting the 2019 notification that extended the outfit’s ban under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA).

According to the Centre, the organisation’s goal is to engage students and the youth in the preaching of Islam and to gain support for Jihad. Through ‘Islami Inqilab,’ the group also promotes the establishment of ‘Shariat’-based Islamic rule. The group rejects the nation-state and the Indian Constitution, especially its secular orientation. It also considers idol worship to be a sin and considers it a ‘responsibility’ to put a stop to such behaviours.

The affidavit also stated that SIMI, through its members, has ties in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh and Nepal and is inspired by and exploited by different fundamentalist Islamic terrorist groups functioning inter alia from the state of Jammu & Kashmir. Furthermore, terrorist organisations like Hizb-ul-Mujahideen and Lashkar-e-Toiba have effectively recruited SIMI cadres to fulfil their anti-national aims, as stated by the administration.

About its continued activities, the authorities declared that “After the prohibition, SIMI is carrying out its activities under the garb of cover groups in many states of the nation. Many SIMI cadres have reorganised under various names, including ‘Wahadat-e-Islami’ in Tamil Nadu, ‘Indian Mujahideen’ in Rajasthan, Karnataka, Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, and Delhi, ‘Ansarullah’ in Karnataka, ‘Muslim Muttahida Mihad’ in Uttar Pradesh, ‘Wahadat-e-Ummat’ in Madhya Pradesh, and ‘Nagarik Adhikar Suraksha Manch’ in West Bengal.”

The home ministry pointed out that one ‘Karuna Foundation’ in Kerala was used by ex-SIMI members as well. Another organisation by the name ‘Amanat Foundation’ also showed pro-SIMI leanings. “At all India levels, SIMI has been regrouped under various names including ‘Tahreek-e-Ehyaa-e-Ummat,’ a movement for the revival of the Community, ‘Tehreek-Talaba-e-Arabia;’ ‘Tehrik Tahaffuz-e-Sha’aire Islam’ etc. Besides, there are over three dozen other front organizations through which SIMI is being continued. These front organisations help SIMI in various activities including collection of funds, circulation of literature, regrouping of cadres, etc,” the Centre stated.

SIMI and the terrorist attacks carried out by the banned terrorist organisation

The Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) was formed in 1977 at Aligarh in Uttar Pradesh, initially as a student wing of the Jamaat-e-Islami Hind (JIH). It is believed that SIMI was established to renew Jamaat-e-Islami’s older student wing, the Students Islamic Organisation (SIO). However, SIMI split off from the main organisation due to ideological differences and proclaimed independence in 1993.

SIMI, run by the most fundamentalist and extremist students, worked on the ideas of establishing Sharia and governing the country based on the Quran, propagation of Islam and carrying out “Jihad” for the cause of Islam. The banned terror outfit was against the “Western ideals” and rejects secularism, democracy and nationalism. It seeks the restoration of the “khilafat” or caliphate and establishes Dar-ul-Islam (Islamic land) in India by converting the populace.

In addition, SIMI sought to emphasise “ummah”, or the Muslim brotherhood and the need for a Jihad to establish the supremacy of Islam. As a result, the SIMI, a student body, transformed itself into a terrorist outfit to fulfil its intended objective. SIMI became active in the country for the next few decades and carried out some of the deadliest terrorist attacks on Indian soil.

Some notable terrorist attacks involving SIMI include:

  1. 1992 Bombay Riots: SIMI was allegedly involved in the communal riots that occurred in Mumbai (formerly Bombay) in 1992-1993.
  2. 2001 Indian Parliament Attack: Several members of SIMI were suspected to have connections with the terrorist organizations responsible for the attack on the Indian Parliament in December 2001.
  3. 2006 Mumbai Train Bombings: SIMI was suspected to have been involved in the serial train bombings in Mumbai in July 2006 that claimed the innocent lives of over 209 people.
  4. 2008 Ahmedabad Bombings: SIMI members were alleged to have played a role in the coordinated bomb attacks in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, in July 2008.
  5. 2013 Bodh Gaya Blast: Members of SIMI were suspected of being involved in the blasts at the Mahabodhi Temple in Bodh Gaya, Bihar, in July 2013.
  6. Abdul Sattar, a SIMI operative, was arrested in the case relating to a 2007 terror training camp held at Wagamon in Kerala after he was deported from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). NIA also suspected Sattar’s involvement in other cases, including the 2008 Bangalore blasts.
  7. In April 2015, there was another incident in which two alleged SIMI members, Mohammed Eijazuddin and Mohammed Aslam, who had escaped from Khandwa Jail in Madhya Pradesh in October 2013, shot dead Telangana policemen.

SIMI also has a history of even aiding Pakistan’s ISI against India. The SIMI was originally banned in 2001 under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) and the organisation’s ban has been extended on a regular basis since then. The MHA extended the ban on SIMI for five years in its January 31, 2019 announcement. This was the eighth time the ban has been extended. Nevertheless, SIMI was active for nearly four decades in the country.

How the banned terror outfit later metamorphosed into the Indian Mujahideen

The dreaded organisation SIMI is also considered the parent organisation of Indian Mujahideen, founded by several radicalized members including Iqbal Bhatkal, Riyaz Bhatkal, Yasin Bhatkal, Abdul Subhan Qureshi, Amir Reza Khan and Sadiq Israr Sheikh, among others. Some analysts suggest that IM split off from SIMI, attracting extremist elements, thus becoming the terrorist wing of SIMI. According to Indian intelligence, the IM had members from the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) and terrorists Harkat ul-Jihad-e-Islami (HuJI).

In fact, HuJI, ARCA, Jamaat-e-Hind, Students Islamic Organisation (SIO) and Lashkar-e-Taiba, all have links with Indian Mujahideen. Also, there is strong evidence linking IM and Pakistan’s ISI.

Indian Mujahideen (IM), the Islamist terrorist group has been active since at least 2005. It carried out several serial bombings in Indian cities in the following years including the Varanasi blasts in March 2006, the Mumbai sequential explosions in July 2006, the detonations in the courts of Uttar Pradesh in Varanasi, Faizabad and Lucknow in November 2007 as well as the Jaipur periodic bomb blasts, Delhi serial explosions and the Hyderabad twin blasts in August 2007.

The terrorist group claimed responsibility for the 13 May 2008 Jaipur bombings in an e-mail addressed to Indian media, threatening to “demolish the faiths (all religions aside from Islam) of the infidels of India.”

The group’s largest and most audacious strike to date was the series of explosions in Ahmedabad in 2008, which received national attention due to the more than 50 casualties.

Recently, on July 13, 2023, a special court of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in Delhi handed down 10-year prison sentences to four individuals involved in the Indian Mujahideen conspiracy case. The probe pertained to a plot orchestrated by Pakistan-backed terrorists to carry out bomb blasts across India.

The NIA revealed that the perpetrators were closely associated with Indian Mujahideen members, notably the prime accused Riyaz Bhatkal with ties to Pakistan and Yasin Bhatkal, who is based in India.

The NIA stated that Yasin Bhatkal, one of the founding members of the Indian Mujahideen, was “instrumental in motivating young Muslim boys into the path of violent Jihad and to further indoctrinated them and to induct them into Indian Mujahideen.” He actively participated in “causing bomb blasts resulting in the loss of several lives and destruction of properties,” based on the agency’s submission.

It is noteworthy to mention the inclusion of the Indian Mujahideen in the UAPA’s First Schedule as a prohibited terrorist group as of 22 June 2009.

Allahabad High Court agrees to listen to the Muslim side in the case of the disputed Gyanvapi ‘mosque’ structure: Details

On 25th July, Allahabad High Court agreed to hear the petition of the Muslim side against ASI survey at the disputed structure called the Gyanvapi mosque case in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. The matter will be listed for hearing on 26th July. Hindu and Muslim sides will be in the court for the hearing. The High Court may pass the orders tomorrow itself in the matter.

Notably, on 24th July, the Supreme Court of India halted the Archeological Survey of India’s (ASI) survey at the disputed structure for two days till 26th July (Wednesday) at 5 PM. Earlier, Allahabad High Court reserved judgment in other matters related to the disputed structure, which will be pronounced on 28th July.

Supreme Court halted Varanasi district court orders for ASI survey

On 21st July, the district court of Varanasi allowed an ASI survey at the disputed site, excluding the sealed area where Shivling was found. However, while the ASI team already reached to survey the disputed structure, the Muslim side approached Supreme Court and got a stay for two days on 24th July. The Supreme Court initially asked to approach High Court without giving any relief to the Muslim side.

However, Senior Advocate Huzefa Ahmadi representing Anjuman Intezamia Committee (AIC), misled the court by claiming ASI was using penetrative methods for the survey. SG Tushar Mehta confirmed only measurement and photography were being conducted by ASI, and not even a brick was being touched or will be touched in the future. However, Ahmadi kept asking for a stay on the survey. SC asked the Muslim side to approach High Court for the matter.

Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu petitioners in the Shringar Gauri-Gyanvapi complex case, said in a statement that the Muslim side misled the court. He said, “The Muslim side, Anjuman Intezamia misled the Supreme Court and gave the wrong statement that excavation is being held there, whereas no such excavation process has begun there.”