Home Blog Page 6069

Pakistan blacklisted: FATF’s regional affiliate APG blacklists Pakistan for failure to curb terror funding

0

In a significant development, the APG, FATF’s major regional affiliate has blacklisted Pakistan for its failure to curb terror funding. The APG is currently meeting in Canberra, Australia where Pakistan has failed miserably to show improvements in set parametres for financial systems.


After global isolation of the terror state of Pakistan, the parody country was all set to face further humiliation a major affiliate group of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is now on the verge of blacklisting Pakistan, reports India Today.

Pakistan, which has been already grey-listed by the FATF, has been put in the black-list by the Asia-Pacific Group (APG) of the FATF, one of the nine regional affiliates of the anti-money laundering watchdog.

The APG is currently meeting at Canberra in Australia conducting a five-year mutual evaluation of Pakistan’s progress on upgrading its systems in areas of financial and insurance services.

On Wednesday, Pakistan had submitted the compliance report on its 27-point action plan to the FATF, which is currently under review by the APG and has found Islamabad lacking on many fronts. Reportedly, the APG has found deficiencies in Islamabad’s anti-money laundering and combating terror financing efforts.

Reza Baqir, the governor of Pakistan’s State Bank, is currently heading a 10-member team to represent Pakistan at the APG meeting. So far, Pakistan’s performance has been assessed as ‘poor’.

In the APG, there are around 40 parameters of which Pakistan has failed in over 35. There are 11 effectiveness parameters and Pakistan has failed in 10.

Meanwhile, Pakistan has to show compliance in both, the Mutual evaluation and the FATF action plan. The next plenary session of the FATF to be held in October will take up the final review of Pakistan’s case.

The blacklist is the lowest list of the APG. The APG blacklisting will have be a major blow to Pakistan as its chances of being blacklisted by FATF in October have now increased manifold.

Pakistan was earlier placed under the FATF greylist after severe pressure from the US, France, Germany, and the UK over Pakistan’s failure to curb terror funding. The adverse findings by the APG will keep Islamabad on the negative radar when the deadline for the final review ends in October 2019. A blacklisting by the APG can have a major impact on the final decision of the FATF and may result in an overall blacklisting of Pakistan.

The Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering (FATF) is an intergovernmental organization founded in 1989 on the initiative of the Group of 7 (G7) to develop policies to combat money laundering and terrorism financing.

USA, UK, Canada, and Pakistani NGO representative at UN slam China and parody country Pakistan over minority rights violation

In a major embarrassment to the terrorist state of Pakistan, on Thursday, the United States, United Kingdom and Canada slammed Pakistan and China for discrimination against religious minorities at a United Nations meeting held to discuss the safety of Religious Minorities in New York.

Yesterday, on first International Day for Victims of Violence based on Religion or Belief, Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan tweeted to draw the attention of international community on Kashmir.


Lying to the world at large, Khan accused that the Kashmiris were not even allowed to celebrate Eid ul Adha observed earlier this month. Ironically, Pakistan, the global terror exporter, has also decided to approach the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over alleged human rights abuses in Kashmir.

However, Syed Akbaruddin, India’s permanent representative to the United Nations, shared a video on Twitter and took a dig at the Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan. He pointed out the irony in Khan who was accusing India of allegedly violating international humanitarian laws by “attacking innocent civilians” in Jammu and Kashmir despite the fact that Pakistan itself has been accused of Human Rights violations against minorities by the UN bodies.


The meeting took on the first-ever International Day Commemorating the Victims of Acts of Violence Based on Religion or Belief, which was established by a resolution of the General Assembly following a resolution led by the Polish government.

The New York meeting, hosted by Polish foreign minister Jacek Czaputowicz, was attended by Sam Brownback – US ambassador for religious freedom, Michelle Bachelet – the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and Naveed Walter – President of Human Rights Focus Pakistan among others.

The most embarrassing moment for Pakistan came when Naveed Walter, the President of Human Rights Focus Pakistan, himself admitted that there were grave human rights violations against minorities in Pakistan. Amusingly, Pakistan NGO head Naveed Walter also called out minority rights violation in Pakistan where attacks are carried out on religious places.

“Today, a large number of people are marginalized in their own societies. The biased behavior dwells in other areas also, like the minorities. On the basis of religious affiliation as like in Pakistan, Ahmadis having a situation; like China, a growing number of countries using national security as a pretext for restricted religious expression at the role of religion in public domain,” said Naveed Walter.

Sam Brownback, the US Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom at UN meet on Safety of Religious Minorities in New York said, that religious minorities in Pakistan continue to suffer from prosecution either at hands of non-state elements or through discriminatory laws and practices.

Brownback also raised his concerns regarding Human rights violations in China. “We remain deeply concerned about the Chinese government escalating widespread and undue restrictions on religious freedom in China. We urge the Chinese government to respect the human rights & fundamental freedoms of everyone in that nation,” said Brownback.

Echoing the same sentiments, Lord Ahmad, British PM’s Special Envoy on Freedom of Religion or Belief said, “the United Kingdom has spoken up for rights of religious communities and minorities across the world. From Uyghurs in China, Christians and Ahmadis in Pakistan.”

The terrorist state of Pakistan, which displays its cowardice by unleashing terror across the world, is notoriously known for grave human rights violations. Apart from causing severe pain, misery and deaths by perpetrating terror, Pakistan commits human rights violations ethnic and religious minorities from Pakistan.

The Mohajirs, the Pashtuns, Ahmedias, the Balochs and even the religious minorities like Hindus and Christians have time and again accused the Pakistani establishment and security agencies of engaging in human rights violations against them.

‘Priyanka Chopra has the right to speak in personal capacity’: UNICEF rubbishes Pakistan’s petition to have her removed as Ambassador

0

Priyanka Chopra, who once lived in India and often performs the role of a ‘peacenik’, had recently faced strong denunciation from similar ‘peace-loving’ Pakistani citizens after she came out in support of the Indian Air Force and tweeted, “Jai Hind”. Pakistan expressed anguish over support by Priyanka Chopra to Indian armed forces and have demanded the removal of the actress as a goodwill ambassador of UNICEF.

“War between two nuclear powers can only lead to destruction & death. As goodwill ambassador of UNICEF, Priyanka Chopra was supposed to stay neutral and peaceful but her tweet in favour of Indian arm forces after they invaded Pakistan airspace shows otherwise. She doesn’t deserve this title any more,” the petition read.

A Pakistan woman had accused Priyanka Chopra of being a hypocrite and encouraging nuclear war in an event in Lok Angeles. She had made these accusations because, after the Balakot airstrikes, Chopra had tweeted ‘Jai Hind’.

The Pakistan petition essentially wanted Priyanka Chopra removed from the position of UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador For Peace based on her support for the Indian Armed Forces.

Now, Stephane Dujarric, the spokesperson for Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, in his daily briefing on Thursday has said that Priyanka Chopra retains the right to speak in her personal capacity on issues concerning her.

Reportedly, Dujarric said, “When UNICEF Goodwill Ambassadors speak in their personal capacity, they retain the right to speak about issues that interest or concern them, Their personal views or actions do not necessarily reflect those of UNICEF.”

Dujarric, however, added that the Ambassadors have to maintain an impartial position while representing UNICEF on any platform.

Pakistan has a long history of being paranoid and usually overreacts at any given situation. While Priyanka Chopra herself is widely considered as a hypocrite as she often peddles the ‘aman ki asha’ narrative, in this instance, Priyanka got chided by the very country she thinks India should maintain peace with.

Sri Lanka busts Pakistan’s lies, says never mentioned Kashmir in their meeting with Pakistan envoy

Pakistan seems hell-bent on being exposed and humiliated worldwide. Being compulsive liars, they have been exposed time and again internationally. Yesterday, Sri Lanka has exposed Pakistan’s lies where Pakistan had claimed that the Sri Lankan president has offered to mediate between India and Pakistan.

Pakistan’s High Commissioner in Sri Lanka Shahid Ahmad Hashmat had recently requested the Sri Lankan president for a meeting. After the meeting on 20th August, the statement by the Pakistani high commissioner has claimed that the Sri Lankan president had acknowledged that Kashmir is a ‘disputed territory’ and the dispute should be resolved according to the wishes of the Kashmiri people under the UN resolutions.

He had also claimed that President Sirisena has offered to mediate between India and Pakistan.

Pakistan HC’s press release, courtesy: Aditya Raj Kaul

After the office of the Pakistan High Commissioner in Sri Lanka issued this statement, the office of Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena has denied giving any such statement.

In a press release, the Sri Lankan president has clarified that though the Pakistani envoy had briefed the Sri Lankan President about India’s recent decision to abrogate Article 370 and section 35A regarding Jammu and Kashmir, Sri Lanka has made no such statement as Pakistan claims.

Sri Lankan President’s press release, courtesy: Aditya Raj Kaul

President Sirisena’s office has stated, “The President gave a careful hearing to the Pakistan High Commissioner’s views and stated that both India and Pakistan have excellent friendly relations with Sri Lanka and Sri Lanka’s interest is to see the growth of regional cooperation and friendship. The President did not make any other comment on the issues pertaining to India and Pakistan,”

Also read: Pakistan claims Russia invited Imran Khan to the EEF in September. No, we did not, says Russia

It is notable here that Sri Lanka was one of the first countries to acknowledge that India’s decision regarding Article 370 and Jammu and Kashmir bifurcation are its internal matters. In a statement after the decision, Sri Lankan PM Ranil Wickremesinghe had asserted that it is India’s internal issue and he had also expressed pleasure at the Buddhist majority Ladakh being a separate Union Territory finally.


Pakistan has been trying desperately for international intervention over the Kashmir issue. However, all its efforts and juvenile rants seem to be in vain as the country keeps losing all credibility with one international embarrassment after another.

France firmly in India’s corner: Kashmir a bilateral issue, strong statements on terrorism

Prime Minister Narendra Modi met the French President Emmanuel Macron in Chantilly, France and briefed him on the recent Government of India’s decision to abrogate Article 370 making Jammu and Kashmir an integral part of India without any riders attached. In a joint statement issued last evening, the French President said that the Kashmir situation between India and Pakistan is a bilateral issue and no third party should interfere or incite violence.


“PM Modi told me what decisions the government has taken and that they are based on India’s sovereignty. However, it is important that there is stability there and we must ensure that the situation doesn’t worsen,” said the French President.

The French President also issued a strong statement on terrorism and called upon “all countries to work together for halting cross-border movement of terrorists belonging to Al Qaeda, ISIS, Jaish-e-Mohammed, Hizbul Mujahideen, Lashkar-e-Tayabba and their affiliates in South Asia and Sahel region.


The two countries also called upon UN member countries to implement UNSC Resolution 2462 on Fighting Terrorist Financing adopted last March and agreed to call upon a global conference to tackle terrorism threat across the globe.

President Macron expressed condolences over the ghastly Pulwama attack earlier this year and added that India and France would continue to work together to fight terrorism. Reaffirming the commitment to ‘Make In India’, President Macron said that our defence sector shows how much we trust each other. He even added that the first Rafale aircraft will reach India next month.

President Macron also added that he would like India to be a part of the G7 and that he has changed some parts about how G7 is organised. G7 consists of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom and United State of America.

BJP to conduct nationwide public awareness campaign on Article 370, to rope in 2000 prominent personalities

Ever since the abrogation of Article 370 by the Narendra Modi government, some anti-social elements have been trying to disrupt the peace in the valley through a well-chalked out propaganda. While the government of India is doing everything in its capacity to bring peace, normalcy and development to the terror infested region, ignorance about the article granting separate status to Jammu and Kashmir has led the unsuspecting people to fall prey to the wicked plans of the propaganda machinery.

In the wake of this move and to spread awareness about Article 370, BJP has planned a Jan Jagaran Abhiyan-public awareness campaign and Sampark Abhiyan on Article 370 beginning September 1.

As per a report, this program will be attended by BJP President Amit Shah, working President JP Nadda, senior ministers, chief ministers among others. This program is slated to run between September 1 to September 30. The party will take this campaign through 370 places and will hold large scale meetings in 35 big cities.

According to the information available, the party has formed two committees to prepare for the campaign that will be headed by Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas Dharmendra Pradhan and Minister of Jal Shakti Gajendra Singh Shekhawat.

As per the plan, the party will rope in 2,000 prominent personalities from different parts of the country for the Sampark Abhiyan to explain the reasons behind the abrogation of Article 370 and Article 35A, and its repercussions. Shah, Nadda and other leaders will meet the prominent personalities.

Under the Jan Jagaran Abhiyan, the party will hold public awareness campaigns across 370 places. During this, small gatherings and rallies will be organized.

Various political parties including Congress have opposed the abrogation of Article 370 by the government.

Special CBI Court grants CBI custody of Chidambaram till 26th August

A special CBI Court has granted CBI custody of former Union Minister for Finance and Home, P. Chidambaram, in the INX Media Case. Custody has been granted till the 26th of August.


As per reports, the Court has permitted Chidambaram’s family and lawyers to meet him for half an hour every day. Furthermore, a medical check-up for Chidambaram has been ordered every 48 hours.

Chidambaram was arrested late night on Wednesday by the CBI soon after he reached his Jor Bagh residence in New Delhi following his appearance at a press conference at AICC headquarters. The arrest came after high-intensity drama where CBI officials had to climb up walls to reach the senior Congress leader.

Chidambaram spent the night at the CBI headquarters, the CBI headquarters where he spent his night was the same building he inaugurated back in 2011 when he was the Home Minister.

Online Aggregators: Corporate Strategy bleeding the Hotel Industry

0

Amidst the controversy involving the various Online Aggregators, and the E-Commerce Business Companies, the widest and the most popular dispute in the recent days is between the Hoteliers and the Online Aggregator ‘OYO Rooms’.

Hoteliers and their Associations are speaking out against the policies and method of business by the Online Aggregators. Protests and agitations against OYO is making news in Print and Social Media, since few days.

What’s hitting the hotel industry hard? Undue control of the customer market, withholding of hoteliers’ money, arbitral deductions of unreasonable commissions, unreasonable convenience fees, invoicing issues, manipulation of average room rate (ARR) and many such unreasonable practices has lead to discomfort, and anger in the Hotelier Community against E-Commerce Companies and Online Aggregators like OYO.

The entire world is moving towards the online business market, Asset Light Business Modules are dominating the market, across all industries, services and professions. Factors of customer convenience exist, but the question remains are these Asset light businesses ethical? Sustainable or are they a threat to the “Real Asset and Business Owners”?

What we must understand is the significance of OYO for the Customer. It is a facility which gives the customer rooms for affordable rates! However, for a Hotelier, OYO is a facade which sells the Hotelier’s rooms for prices much below their costs. Basically, a transaction of unfair trade practice and market disruption. In fact, Oravel Stays Private Limited, Allcott Town Planners Private Limited and many other associated Companies have been now branded as ‘OYO’.

The Business and the Facade

It has often been said that the principal business model of OYO was based on an innovative module of providing couples with affordable rooms. The business model functioned on anonymity. The couples did not need to reveal their identity and the hotels did not need to keep a record. This was a ‘business model’ but was in direct violation of the law of the land. In legal terms, one would call it ‘A Principle Actus Reus Mens Rea’, which is, an act was done with a guilty mind, for benefit, against public policy

Once OYO gained popularity with this initial module they proceeded with their actual plan of market penetration. Essentially, they first gained the confidence of some players and then when they are lured completely, they proceeded to manipulate them.

A systematic way of OYO in establishing its foot in the market is of searching for those hotels who are into the unorganized mid-size segment. OYO looks for those who lack marketing skills and reach and provide such hoteliers with initial promotion facilities for some months. After that, they take up such small hotels in a radius of 2 – 3 kms to initiate competition and lower the prices. OYO essentially plays the volume game for controlling the customers and then when there are substantial hotel properties under the banner of OYO, they start slashing the Average Annual Room Rates to less than 50%. The reduction of price, in turn, leads to sales prices less than the cost prices with hotels making a clear cut loss.

One might wonder, what’s the harm in this? An average hotel has a staff strength of at least 40 employees. With such predatory pricing methods of sale, any business can run down to losses in 2 years. This then means that the Hotel property owners would be run out of business, eventually.

A Corporate Strategy purposefully mismanaged

Hoteliers have been complaining about the method in which their complaints are being addressed regarding the manipulations of OYO and its representatives. OYO does not have a properly qualified staff to redress the grievances of the Hoteliers relating to payments received, GST paid etc. When hoteliers inquire, the staff usually has the same answer to offer – ‘We have raised it to the central team’. However, the central team has never ever appeared before the Hoteliers with proper papers.

It is often noticed that OYO employs people from unrelated fields in several departments. One would ask why someone from humanities would be offered a post in the Accounts department. Several hoteliers now suspect that such hiring practices are done to exhaust the hoteliers from raising their issues with OYO.

The Root Cause: The Transaction

As per various statutes, principally the Indian Contract Act 1872 read with the Specific Relief Act, 1963, OYO is an ‘Agent’ appointed by a Hotelier to perform a specific function of marketing and sales. It is settled that the Agent is paid his commission by the Principal i.e. the Hotelier; from the proceeds of the customer and accordingly all taxes including GST etc. are settled and paid to the government.

However, with OYO, one sees a complete reversal of the transaction.

The Customer pays the Agent first and then the Agent withholds the entire amount for a period of 60 days or more. After that pays only half of the amount to the Hotelier after much of harassment. In this entire fiasco, OYO uses the money of the Hotelier for 60 days to manage its internal cash flows. The hoteliers get further harassed because they have to pay GST as soon as the invoice of sale is raised.

OYO hardly bothers tallying its own account statement with the account statement of the hotelier for receipts and balances. Instead, it shoots out an Excel sheet of confusing explanations termed as ‘RECON SHEET’ in order to confuse the hoteliers further.

Another common complaint that the Hoteliers have is the arbitral increase in the commission rates, reducing the Minimum Guarantee without the consent of the Hotelier, Levying of Convenience Charges which are never approved; which again indicates that the Company has various unethical practices resorted to showing its strong cash flow position before its investors.

Further, Softbank, a Japanese company headquartered in Tokyo Japan seems to hold the majority stake in OYO.

The Basis of Hospitality

Hospitality is to do with ‘Service’ to the customers. Service builds the reputation of the Hotel and the Hotelier. It’s not just about the brick and mortar, it’s much more than that. Further, without an Asset in Place, an Asset Light Module cannot work.

(‘The Author is a Practicing Advocate dealing with litigation matters in White Collar Crimes and Economic Offences and is representing certain stakeholders in the Hospitality industry. However, the views expressed and information shared in the article does not contain any specific instances of a privileged communication or confidential information and that the said views and information is publicly available and is of general nature’)

Bombay HC directs Mumbai Police to file a case against Ajit Pawar and 70 others in a Bank scam

The Bombay High Court on Thursday instructed the Mumbai Police’s Economic Offences Wing (EOW) to lodge a First Information Report (FIR) against NCP leader Ajit Pawar and 70 others in Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank (MSCB) scam.

The court observed that “prima facie” there was credible evidence against the accused. The accused allegedly were involved in causing losses worth Rs 1,000 crore to MSCB from the period 2007 to 2011. A bench comprising of Justices S C Dharmadhikari and S C Shinde ordered the EOW to file an FIR against the offenders in next 5 days.

Alongside former deputy chief minister Ajit Pawar, NCP leader Jayant Patil is also named in the list of economic offenders and several senior cooperative bank officials.

Scrutiny carried out by the National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), and a charge sheet filed by a quasi-judicial enquiry commission under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (MCS) Act held Pawar and other accused, including several directors of the bank responsible for the loss. It stated that because of their decisions, actions and inactions, massive losses were incurred to the bank.

An audit report by NABARD revealed flagrant violations of several banking laws and RBI norms by the accused in the allotment of loans to sugar factories and spinning mills and the ensuing default on repayment and recovery of such loans. During that time, Ajit Pawar was the director of the bank. However, despite damning scrutiny reports, no FIR was lodged. It was only after a local activist, Sunil Arora filed a complaint with the EOW in 2015 and went to the high court that the police took cognisance of the underlying scam.

‘She is nobody that I should know her,’ Samajwadi Rajya Sabha MP denies knowing Shehla Rashid after sharing stage

Opposition party leaders organized a protest at Jantar Mantar today against the abrogation of Article 370 by the Indian government. Ghulam Nabi Azad of the Congress party, CPI(M) leaders Brinda Karat, Sitaram Yechury and Samajwadi Party leader Ram Gopal Yadav were present at the protest led by DMK. Interestingly, Shehla Rashid also attended the event.

Amusingly enough, mainstream politicians appear to be hesitant to associate themselves with Shehla. Samajwadi Party Rajya Sabha MP Yadav outright denied knowing her minutes after sharing the stage with the freelance activist.

Yadav said, “I am against anyone who says or tweets anything against the Indian Army. I don’t know who Shehla Rashid is, I do not recognize her. She is nobody that I should know her.”

Yadav also clarified that he does not oppose the removal of the Article 370 and the all-party demonstration was limited to demanding the release of political leaders detained in Jammu and Kashmir and allowing the media more freedom in the valley.

Shehla Rashid, a habitual fake news peddler, was under controversy recently for accusing the Indian Army of torture of common citizens of Kashmir. Shehla, moreover, was asked about her dubious allegations against the Indian Army. She was evasive about it as she said she would provide evidence for her claims if the Army constitutes a probe into the matter.

The protests didn’t go according to plans. Karti Chidambaram’s dramatic entry at Jantar Mantar stole the opposition parties’ show as all the media attention went to Karti. The media seemed to be more interested in knowing what the next step of the father-son duo would be than the DMK-led protest.