Home Blog Page 6104

‘Baloch people have lost a great friend’: BLF Chief Dr Allah Nazar issues statement mourning the passing of Sushma Swaraj

0

Sushma Swaraj, one of the tallest leaders of India and a veteran of the Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) passed away late last night due to cardiac arrest. The country mourned the loss of a great leader and stateswomen.

Now, the rebel leader of Balochistan and the chief of Balochistan Liberation Army, Dr Allah Nazar has issued a statement mourning the loss of a leader like Sushma Swaraj.

Dr Allah Nazar Baloch, in a statement to Balochistan’s Sangar Publication, said:

‘Sushma Swaraj’s death is a great loss to the region. She was one of the finest foreign ministers of India. She was a voice of peace and reconciliation in a world torn apart by conflict and hatred. Under her able leadership, the Indian foreign policy embraced a principled position of calling upon the international community to address the plight of marginalized and oppressed people across the region.

Three years ago, at the UN General Assembly, she drew the international community’s attention to “the brutality against the Baloch people,” which she rightly pointed out “represents the worst form of State oppression” faced by the Baloch people in Pakistan.

He stated that our world would be a better place, if like Sushma Swaraj people fought for justice to oppressed people irrespective of national boundaries. The Baloch people will forever remember her for this bold act of bringing the plight of a marginalized people at the centre stage and hope that her able successors will further her principled foreign policy.

India has lost a great daughter and an able leader, but the Baloch people have lost a great friend. May her soul rest in peace’. 

Political leaders across the political spectrum have expressed their sadness and offered condolences to Swaraj’s family.

Swaraj had redefined the relationship between the people and the government. Using social media to its fullest extent, she had reached out and helped countless Indians stranded in other countries. Often, a mere tweet calling for help was enough for her to reach out and provide help in the most difficult of scenarios.

Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries reject Pakistani postgraduate degree in medicine, sack MS and MD doctors from Pakistan

0

In what seems to be another instance of global rejection of Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries have rejected Pakistan’s century-old obsolete postgraduate degree programme in medicine — MS (Master of Surgery) and MD (Doctor of Medicine), while removing it from the eligibility list of the highest-paid tier, reports Dawn.

Reportedly, the decision by Saudi Arabia to downgrade Pakistani doctors comes after the Saudi Ministry of Health claimed that Pakistan medical education lacked a structured training programme, which is a mandatory requirement to hire medics in important positions. After the Saudi move, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain also took a similar step.

The decision has now rendered hundreds of Pakistan doctors in middle-east jobless. Most of these now unqualified doctors who stay in Saudi Arabia are now asked to be ready for deportation.

“Your application for professional qualification has been rejected. The reason is that your master degree from Pakistan is not acceptable according to the Saudi Commission for Health Specialities (SCFHS) regulations,” reads a letter given to the Pakistani doctors.

Reportedly, most of these doctors were hired by a team of the Saudi health ministry in 2016 when it conducted interviews in Karachi, Lahore and Islamabad after inviting applications online.

According to the Pakistan doctors, the decision by Saudi Arabia is a huge shame for them as the same degree programme offered by India, Egypt, Sudan and Bangladesh is acceptable in Saudi Arabia and other countries.

After facing severe humiliation in Saudi Arabia, the doctors and the senior health officials of Pakistan have now blamed the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (CPSP) for damaging their career.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (CPSP) is a public regulatory college in Pakistan which oversees the postgraduate medical education. The CPSP offers certifications for postgraduate training in the specialities of medicine, surgery and dentistry.

Dr Asad Noor Mirza, the spokesperson for the Association of University Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, said that the decision was a setback for Pakistan’s major degree qualification and disrespect to the highly qualified cream of the nation.

He too blamed Pakistan’s regulatory bodies like CPSP for distorting facts about Pakistan’s university programme to maintain the monopoly of the CPSP-sponsored ‘Fellow of College of Physicians and Surgeons’ (FCPS) programme. This is a postgraduate diploma awarded by the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (CPSP) upon completing specialized training.

Dr Ali Usman, another affected medic, said, “I had done five-year postgraduate qualification from the University of Health Sciences, Lahore, with training from Lahore General Hospital. But all of a sudden the Saudi health ministry terminated my job contract, landing me and my family in immense shock.”

When Usman had contacted Director-General of Collaboration Department, Saudi Arabia, he was told that his qualification was rejected when the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (CPSP) delegation had informed the authorities that there was no training-based post-graduate medical degree in Pakistan, except FCPS. He said the CPSP had misled the SCFHS ignoring the fact that Pakistan’s university degree qualification was a structured training programme.

The Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) is a Saudi Arabian scientific commission that regulates healthcare-related practices and accreditation at all levels in Saudi Arabia.

The Saudi authorities had further said that the CPSP president held multiple meetings with relevant officials in Saudi Arabia and asked the authorities to consider only SCHFS qualified Pakistani medicals for jobs here.

University of Health Sciences Vice-Chancellor Prof Dr Javed Akram dismissed the impression that the MS/MD programme was not a structured training qualification.

“The MS and MD degrees are enriched with dynamic, congruent and structured curriculum comprising clinical and research component at par excellence of international standards designed by the World Federation of Medical Education,” Akram said.

He said the University of Health Sciences and many senior medical experts from all over the country had recently taken up the issue of termination of jobs of Pakistani medics and also talked to the SCFHS.

However, Prof Dr Ghulam Mustafa Arain, the Dean (academics) of the CPSP, rejected the allegations levelled by the affected doctors and blamed the affected doctors instead.

He said the CPSP representatives had been promoting FCPS qualification during visits abroad to create a good image of Pakistan in the field of medical education. However, he added that the CPSP cannot think of degrading any medical education programme of Pakistan abroad.

‘Liberals’ troll Jyotiraditya Scindia for daring to go against the party stand to root for India on Article 370

Senior Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia has done the unthinkable. He has dared to go against the party stand on Article 370. Last evening, he tweeted that he supports the move of government of India which fully integrates Jammu and Kashmir into India.


No sooner did Scindia showed some courage to extend support to something that was pro India and against the party’s stand, the ‘liberals’, who champion free will in their spare time, descended upon his timeline to question him whether he is also joining the BJP.


According to this columnist, Scindia supports dilution of Article 370 because he was ‘miffed’ that Kamal Nath became the Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh.


This was also echoed by other self-proclaimed ‘liberals’.


Media troll who equated Dalits to animals, also trolled Scindia and called his family a ‘British stooge’.


More ‘liberal’ journalists also joined in.


Since stripping down of Article 370 in Kashmir, Congress, along with other Opposition parties has maintained that it is against the move. While most members of the Congress including ex-president, Rahul Gandhi has been toeing the Pakistani line and speaking against the move there are few who have gone against their party’s stand to bat for this bold and pathbreaking decision taken by Modi led NDA government.

Senior Congress leader Deepender Hooda who extended his support to stripping down of Article 370 saying that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India and such a move will be beneficial to Kashmiris. His support had also come with riders that such a move should have been made by taking other political parties into confidence.

Another senior Congress leader Janardan Dwivedi, a close aide of former Congress President and currently UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi, too went against the party’s stand and welcomed the move. Congress’ Rae Bareli MLA Aditi Singh, too, welcomed the move.

Moreover, Congress’ chief whip Bhubaneswar Kalita resigned from Rajya Sabha yesterday because he was upset over Congress’ stand to oppose Centre’s move to dilute Article 370. He stated that Congress’ stand on this issue was “against the people’s feelings” and that the party seemed “hell-bent on political suicide.”

Atif Aslam, Veena Malik may be ‘artists’ for peaceniks in India, but to them, they will always remain Pakistani first

Pakistani singer, Atif Aslam, whose songs were banned by the popular music company T-series in wake of the ghastly terrorist attack in Pulwama took to Facebook to write a post denouncing India bold move to dilute Article 370 in Kashmir.

Screenshot of Atif Aslam’s Facebook post

In his post, Atif Aslam condemned the “violence and tyranny being conducted against the Kashmiris” and prayed to Allah to bless the lives of the innocents in Kashmir.

Aslam was leaving for Hajj and before condemning the imaginary violence in Kashmir, he asked for forgiveness from all.

Interestingly, artists across the border are hailed by the so-called liberals and welcomed with open arms while claiming that art has no boundaries. Except, when it comes to Pakistan, the Pakistani artists will always put their country and quite often their religion above everything else. Such can be seen from reality show contestant turned Internet troll Veena Malik.

While Malik casually engages in spreading fake news on the Internet, she also appears to be in dire need of some therapist for her outbursts which can only be termed psychotic, to put it mildly.


There were no cluster bombs used against Pakistan nor has any force been used against Kashmiris. She had sort of lost her mind even during the Balakot Air Strike the Indian Air Force carried out against the terror camps in Pakistan. She is also an unabashed fangirl of Pakistani Army.


But she will always, remain a Muslim.


Which is fine. Except, the ‘liberals’ on this side of the border always saw her as an artist. Back in 2014, Malik had tweeted “India sucks” and blamed it on her India-based manager Prashant Singh. She had accused him of hacking into her account. Back then also, filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt had reportedly come to her rescue and asked her to ‘ignore’ such ‘hacking’.

Apparently, till 2014, she considered herself to be an ambassador between India and Pakistan and had “immense respect” for India.

Bhatt, a regular peacenik and father of Rahul Bhatt, who was allegedly a close associate of terrorist David Headley who was involved in 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, has been instrumental in making careers of both Atif Aslam and Veena Malik. Bhatt was the first one to give Aslam a chance in his film ‘Zeher’ by including his song ‘Woh Lamhey’. Bhatt has also been a wellwisher of Malik.

And while Bhatt may want to cry himself hoarse that art and artists have no religion or boundaries, he could perhaps look a little closer to see how two of his proteges are proving him otherwise.

‘India has a right to amend its sovereign laws’: After UAE and Sri Lanka, Maldives supports India’s move to abrogate Article 370

The Modi government took a bold step recently. Led by Home Minister Amit Shah in the parliament, the Modi government introduced a bill to do away with the provisions of Article 370 that gave Jammu and Kashmir its special status. The Modi government also bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir and turned J&K and Ladakh into two separate Union Territories.

The move has been met with support from several countries around the world. Most countries have asserted that this is India’s internal matter and it should do as it deems fit.

The Maldives has now issued a statement regarding the step by the Modi Government.

Statement by the Maldives

Statement by the Maldives says:

“The Maldives considers the decision taken by the Government of India regarding Article 370 of the Indian Constitution as an internal matter. We believe that it is the right of every sovereign nation to amend their laws as required”.

Recently, the UAE and Sri Lanka have also issued similar statements in support of India. China raised ‘concerns’ and was told off by the Indian Government. The Indian Government said that this is India’s internal matter and just as India does not interfere in the internal matters of other countries, she expects other countries to not interfere in India’s internal matters.

Manish Tewari misleads the parliament by saying Article 370 was permanent. Here are the facts

Yesterday the Article 370 of the Indian Constitution was abolished when the Lok Sabha approved a presidential resolution abolishing the Article invoking the provision of clause 3 of Article 370. The resolution got more vote than the strength of NDA, which means several opposition parties voted for it.

Congress party had opposed the move, and in doing so, they had even resorted to misinterpretation that the Article 370 is permanent and it can’t be revoked. Participating in the debate on the resolution, senior Congress leader Manish Tewari argued that clause 3 of the Article 370 implies that it was meant to be permanent. He had read out the clause 3, which reads:

Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this article, the President may, by public notification, declare that this article shall cease to be operative or shall be operative only with such exceptions and modifications and from such date as he may specify:

Provided that the recommendation of the Constituent Assembly of the State referred to in clause (2) shall be necessary before the President issues such a notification.

This clause means that the president may revoke the Article 370, but a recommendation of the Constituent Assembly is required to do so.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIOzsZSkFrs]

He argued that this provision was kept to give the Article 370 a permanency, as the Constituent Assembly does not exist anymore, which was dissolved in 1957. His argument is that since the Constituent Assembly does not exist to approve the abolition of Article 370, this Article is permanent.

Manish Tewari made only selective reading to mislead the house and country to claim that Article 370 is permanent, which is not correct.

First, the Article 370 itself is included in the part of Part XXI of the constitution, which is titled Temporary and Transitional provisions. This means, every article included in Part XXI, are supposed to be temporary and transitional, they are never meant to be permanent like the Congress leader was claiming. Even the first prime minister of India and Congress leader Jawaharlal Nehru had said that Article 370 is temporary.

Article 370 is part of Temporary and transitional provisions of constitution

Article 370 was temporary, because it was created to apply provisions of Indian constitution selectively in the state till the time the state constitution was ready, and it was supposed to be abolished after preparation of the Jammu and Kashmir constitution. But the Constituent Assembly dissolved itself in 1957 without recommending removal of Article 370, and it remained in the constitution.

Every article of the constitution is India can be amended using due process, even its preamble was amended during the emergency by Indira Gandhi government, so it is completely wrong to say that Article 370 is permanent. The fact that requirement of approval of a non-existing Constituent Assembly was there to abrogate it was an anomaly, which should have been corrected long ago.

Just like everything in the constitution, including the preamble, can be amended, the requirement of abolishing an Article also can be amended, which was done using the constitutional provisions itself by the government.

Advocate Murad Ali files sedition case against Omar Abdullah, Mehbooba Mufti and others for opposing abrogation of Article 370

An advocate in Bihar has filed a sedition case in a court in Bettiah, West Champaran against Omar Abdullah, Mehbooba Mufti and several others who opposed the abolition of Article 370. Taking cognisance of the case filed by the lawyer, the court has set the next hearing on the case on September 24, 2019.


A lawyer in Betia court, Murad Ali filed a petition under charges of sedition and criminal conspiracy for opposing the scrapping of Article 370. “I have registered a case against former chief ministers of Jammu and Kashmir Mehbooba Mufti, Omar Abdullah and other political leaders who have opposed the abrogation of Article 370,” Ali told ANI.

Ali further elaborated the sections under which he has filed a case. “I have filed the case under Section 124 A (sedition), 153 A (promoting enmity between different groups of religion, race, place of birth, residence and language), 153 B, 504 (Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code,” he said.

Ali also mentioned that the court heard his stance and transferred the case to the court of Judicial Magistrate KK Shahi for the next hearing which is on September 24. Ali has alleged that the opposing statements made by Omar Abdullah, Mehbooba Mufti and others have denigrated the government in print, electronic and social media. According to Ali, Omar and Mufti have tried to incite hatred among citizens of the country and attempted to hurt the national integrity and peace of the country.

Omar Abdullah and Mehbooba Mufti have vehemently expressed their disapproval over the government’s move to abrogate Article 370 and bifurcate the state into two Union Territories- Jammu and Kashmir with legislature and Ladakh without legislature. Mufti had tweeted that the resolution to bifurcate J and K has reduced India to an “occupying force” in the state.

I am a Kashmiri Pandit, and with the curtains finally falling on Article 370, I feel empowered and vindicated

Yesterday, as the curtains to the ongoing suspense prevailing in Jammu and Kashmir fell, the whole of India erupted in a unanimous wave of joy. Not just the displaced Kashmiri Pandits, but every Indian who feels the pain of our community, exhibited similar sentiments. Together, the Hindus living outside their homeland along with patriotic Indians witnessed the historic events unfold.

My family and I had been waiting with bated breath as the anxiety through the night. There was no way we could keep calm. After many years, the night felt long, very long. Fingers crossed, we hoped our destiny would take a fresh new turn in due course of time, and were thankfully proven right!

As a Kashmiri Pandit woman, mother, wife, and daughter, a golden moment in history was waiting to be scripted. Finally, when Home Minister (HM) Amit Shah let the cat out of the bag in Rajya Sabha by announcing the “Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill,” my happiness knew no bounds. The declaration inundated my heart with a million emotions.

Subconsciously, my eyes were transfixed on the television screen. The joy of witnessing the historic occasion unravel in my lifetime appeared like a dream. I had to pinch myself hard to come back to make sense of it. Then, one after the other, HM demolished the lies, deceit, and propaganda of 70+ years that had been lurking over our rights to a dignified life. Thereafter, every word sounded like sweet music to my ears. Then, tears of joy rolled down, making way through the floodgates.

Suddenly, my 9-year-old son, who was watching TV with us, said, “Mumma, now that Kashmir is a UT when can we return home?” His words hit me like a bullet. After all, Kashmir is the land of our ancestors, where our roots belong and our souls yearn to return!

His heartwarming statement forced me to step out of my thoughts and feel the reality, up and close. A few seconds later, it all began to sink in. That is when we hugged and made merry. We sang and danced. We screamed hard and let the emotions flow uninterrupted.

Three decades of struggle and a million sacrifices later, finally the Government of India (GoI) had grabbed the bull by its horns to serve justice to the now ‘displaced aboriginal peace-loving community’ of the valley. Well begun is half done, and this move has indeed set the precedent for the next course of actions in line with serving complete justice to the Kashmiri Pandits, Sikhs, Ladakhis, Gujjars, Bakarwals, Dogras, and all other communities that have been at the receiving end of the step-motherly treatment by the Muslim leadership. Justice delayed is justice denied. But for our community justice has been elusive thus far!

If you come to think of it, all it took a strong political will, since independence, to correct the “historical wrongs.” A moment of pride embraced us with warmth when the strong-headed government, chose to ignore the threats by local politicians, to prove what robust grit and determination mean. The J&K Reorganisation bill tabled by HM Shah, mirrors his party’s stand, promises, and commitments towards the people of India. It certainly needed a Modi and Shah to meet the aspirations of the real stakeholders of the Kashmir issue.

This political Jodi is well known to beat the odd and swim against the tide. While the hopes were pinned on Modi-led GoI, these two made the impossible look this easy!

By bifurcating J&K into two Union Territories vis-a-vis Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, the GoI, in one masterstroke, has undone the historic wrong. The local leaders did not expect a shock value this magnitude and have since been left in a tizzy. The dynastic politicians who are crying foul now, are the same who remained mute spectators, while an intellectual community was left to fend for itself. The horrors of 19 January 1990 and beyond still give us goosebumps! In one night, the KPs were forced into their 7th exodus in history. In a well-planned massacre, the entire community was forced to run for their lives.

That night, the tranquil air of Kashmir suddenly became sombre when loudspeakers blared threats to leave our homes or be prepared to face the wrath. In the blink of an eye, all you could hear is the hate speeches and sloganeering against Pandits, who suddenly became kafirs. The cacophonous slogans such as Agar Kashmir Main Rehna Hoga, Allah-u-Akbar Kehna Hoga (If you want to live in Kashmir, you have to say Allah-u-Akbar), Battav Ya Raliv, Chaliv nate’ Galiv” (Pandits- either join us/convert, leave or die) and Aes gacche’ Kasheer, Batav ros’ te’ batnev saan (We want Kashmir – without the Pandit men but with Pandit women) amongst a score of other spine chilling war cries made us shiver in fear, anger, and disgust.

As a six-year-old, that night, I remember my panicky mother ordering my maternal family to pack our bags and be ready to leave Srinagar in the dead of the night. We were perplexed and shocked, without a clue. My grandparents were not ready to absorb the news and threw a fit. They bombarded my mother with a volley of questions, which unfortunately she had no answers. Later that night, as the rain Gods grieved along, we were bundled into a truck that quietly steered out of Kashmir, pushing our future into a pit of uncertainties, miseries, and struggles.

The nightmare of that dark night continues to linger on, generation after generation.

Our elders, who were forced by circumstances to unwillingly migrate, had a hard time making adjustments for the longest period. I witnessed my mother’s grandmother, who had fine eyesight even at age 90+, succumb to heatstroke. Till her death, she clung on to her culture and tradition, refusing to compromise her food and lifestyle habits despite living in a comparatively warmer geographical locale.

Like her, every household has a heartbreaking story buried deep within that subconscious corner. We believe, our elders still await justice for the atrocities they endured and today they would be smiling.

Therefore, the historic decision is in a way, gratification for the tyranny that many like my mother’s grandmother have endured for no fault!

Ever since my phone is abuzz with calls, and messages on social media with congratulatory messages about the GoI’s tough stances on Article 370. The participation of Indians in this glorious moment speaks volumes about the ills that had created a divide between us and them.

As temporary, draconian, and discriminatory, Article 370 started to crumble into pieces, one bit at a time, our hearts skipped a million beats. It gives us immense pleasure to thank the GoI for their decisive stand on this biased provision, responsible for a million problems that Kashmir is facing today.

For the uninitiated, scrapping of Article 370 (and Article 35A) from Jammu and Kashmir will usher in a new dawn of opportunities and make J&K “accessible” to Indians. As I write this, the bill has made it through the Lok Sabha too with a massive mandate of 367 (Yeses) vs 67 (noes). One word to sum up these events and my feelings right now is – WOW!

At the moment, the entire Kashmiri Pandit community could not have asked for more. The new bill is certainly the gateway to hope, peace, development, and prosperity in Jammu and Kashmir. We are taking it as writing on the wall that this bold move will end the step-motherly treatment given to Jammu and Ladakh regions comprising the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir. In fact, Kashmir province has a lesser geographical composition compared to Jammu and Ladakh while 1% of the population living there thrived on 10% of funds (taxpayers money) that too with zero accountability. The bifurcation of J&K into two UTs is a significant move in terms of Centre’s penetration (within J&K) that was missing until now.

Today is a day when the historic wrongs have been rectified. We want to live this moment, undiluted. Today, our souls feel liberated from the shackles of the punitive laws. We feel empowered and vindicated. This bold move emboldens the struggle of our community and manifests our unflinching desire to reclaim our glorious past! Today, we feel India is on the verge of taking a giant leap, across the bridges, inching closer towards our lost paradise – Kashmir!

Waking up to a new dawn post Article 370, ushering and embracing new opportunities seems like a dream come true.

It matters not how fast light may travel, darkness shall always be there awaiting its arrival- Mark W Boyer. I rest my case!

Afghanistan: Suicide car bomb in Kabul injures 95, Taliban claims responsibility

0

In yet another barbaric act by Islamic terrorists, at least 95 people have been wounded after a car bomb exploded on Wednesday outside a police station in the Afghan capital Kabul. The Taliban have claimed responsibility for the deadly terror attack.

Reportedly, the blast occurred in the west of the city in the morning rush hour, which sent a huge cloud of grey smoke billowing into the sky. The Taliban has claimed that a “recruitment centre” had been attacked by one of their suicide bombers.

“A large number of soldiers and police were killed or wounded,” the Taliban said in a statement.

The bomb exploded when a vehicle was stopped at a checkpoint outside the police station, said interior ministry spokesman Nasrat Rahimi. A health ministry spokesman said 95 wounded people had been taken to hospitals. Most of the injured were civilians, including women and children, he said.

The security forces had earlier conducted raids in several parts of Kabul overnight and destroyed a major militant hideout.

This attack by the Taliban comes at a time when the United States and Afghanistan are closer to achieve a historic pact to enable the US to withdraw their troops in exchange for a Taliban promise that they would not use the country as a base from which to plot terror attacks.

The violence has been surging across Afghanistan and in Kabul as the US and the Taliban negotiate a peace deal ahead of elections planned for September 28. Just few days back the Taliban had warned of terror strikes in Afghanistan after denouncing the upcoming elections.

They had urged people to stay way from rallies warning of attacks. President Ashraf Ghani is expected to win the elections and be reelected as Afghanistan’s president for a second term. The Taliban have called for boycott of the elections and have said the ‘fighters’ would do anything to block the vote.

EC set to review ‘National Party’ status, TMC, CPI plead to put review on hold till 2024, NCP till Maharashtra elections

After the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, the ‘National Party’ status of some of the parties is being reviewed by the Election Commission of India.

Political parties like Trinamool Congress (TMC), Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) and Communist Party of India (CPI) have urged the Election Commission to put the review on hold till the after the Lok Sabha elections in 2024.

According to the reports, the Election Commission of India had served show-cause notices to TMC, CPI and NCP on July 18 seeking explanation on why their national party status should not be withdrawn after their disastrous performance in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. The parties were given time till August 5 to respond for the EC notice.

Responding to EC’s notice, the TMC has claimed that it was awarded the national party tag only in 2016 and urged the EC to allow them to retain the status till Lok Sabha elections in 2024.

After the 2014 parliamentary polls, the BSP, CPI and NCP stood to lose their national party status, but the EC at that time had agreed to take a lenient view and decided to review their status after two poll cycles. The TMC has pushed the criteria of two election cycles to seek an extension to their national party status.

According to the Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968, political parties need to secure at least six per cent of votes in four or more states in Lok Sabha or assembly elections. A political party can also be declared as a national party if it wins 2% of the seats in the Lok Sabha and it wins seats from at least 3 states. Furthermore, it can be awarded the tag if it’s a declared state party in four states. The above-mentioned parties no longer fulfil these criteria.

The CPI has also requested the EC to review its status till after 2024 while citing the party’s history to defend its national character. “We are one of the oldest political parties of this country and have even participated in the freedom struggle. We also continue to have a national presence. We have submitted this reply to EC and they will now consider it,” said CPI general secretary D Raja.

On the other hand, the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) has requested the Election Commission of India to wait till the Maharashtra Assembly elections results before taking a decision on the national status of the party.

If these three parties are derecognised, only five political parties – the BJP, Congress, National People’s Party, CPM and BSP will continue to be national political parties.

National Parties enjoy certain advantages over state and other registered political parties. Firstly, under the Symbols Order 1968, a party with national status have the right to fight elections using a common symbol across the country. In other words, if a party loses national status, it does not have the right to fight elections using a common symbol across the country.

For example, the analogue clock symbol will not be reserved for all NCP candidates across the country. It can use it only in states where it is recognised as a state party.

Secondly, the National parties receive land or building from the government to establish their party office. Third, national parties can have up to 40-star campaigners while non-national parties can have only up to 20-star campaigners. The expenditure incurred on the travelling and other expenses of star campaigners is not included in the election expenditure of the party candidate.

Finally, the national parties get the time slot on the national and state television and radio to address the people and convey their message to the nation.