Home Blog Page 6216

Revealed: Dhoni’s secret of using different logo on bats during the Cricket World Cup

In a grand gesture to all the bat owners who helped MS Dhoni in the different stages of his career, MS Dhoni using bats in the world cup with different logos on it.

In an interview to Mumbai Mirror, Dhoni’s manager, Arun Pandey revealed reasons for using different bat logos in World Cup games.

As per Pandey, “It’s a fact that he has been using different bats with different brandings, but he is not charging them. He wants to say thank to them for helping in various stages of his career.”

Most of the batsmen charge Rs 4 to 5 crores for bat sponsors. The first multi-dollar deal happened in 1996 when MRF signed Tendulkar as the bat sponsor. Since then, many bat companies signed cricketers all over the world to promote their brand name.

“Dhoni has a big heart. He does not need money; he has enough of it; he is using those bats as a goodwill gesture. BAS was with him from the beginning, and SG also was beneficial to him,” Pandey also said.

MS Dhoni, who is playing his last world cup, has won World T20 in 2007 and World Cup 2011 as an Indian captain. He is the only captain to win ICC World Cup, ICC World T20, ICC Champions Trophy and ICC Number One Test Team mace.

Delhi: Two youths, Maroof and Salman arrested after video of them vandalising shops with swords went viral

A video exposing free run of hooligans in the national capital has emerged. In the terrifying video, a man is seen waving sharp weapons and vandalising the stalls on the roadside.


According to reports, the video relates to an incident that took place on the night of July 2 in Welcome area of Delhi. The man in the video is armed with two weapons, a meat cleaver in his right hand and a long sword in his left hand. He is seen vandalising the food stalls on the side of the road. He hits the stalls with the weapons in his hand, kicks at a glass panel on a food stall, as the people standing there move aside. He also assaults a man who is seen coming out of a shop.

As per reports, Salman was also seen threatening the staff with a machete. As per the police, Salman was released from the jail just a month prior and was accused of extorting the shopkeepers. He even has four other criminal cases against him.

A case has been registered by the police against the accused under the Arms Act. Accused Salman and Maroof have been arrested by Delhi Police. An inquiry has also been ordered by a senior officer in the case.

Former RBI governor Urjit Patel says before 2014, RBI and government was slow in tackling bank crisis

In his first remarks after resigning from the position of governor of Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Urjit Patel held banks, government and the RBI responsible for the spiraling crisis of bad loan mess and the following low capital buffers till 2014. Patel asserted the banks indulged in over-lending and the regulator (RBI) should have acted sooner to reduce the magnitude of the current NPA crisis.

Patel was invited at Standford University where he spoke about the areas of concern for the country’s banking sector including high non-performing assets (NPAs) especially at state-run lenders, and current capital buffers being “overstated” and insufficient to tackle the huge stress. He said, “There are multiple stakeholders responsible for the position we are in right now. Prior to 2014, all stakeholders failed in playing their role adequately. Banks, the regulator, and the government.”

After Narendra Modi came into power in 2014, Patel was appointed as the governor of RBI in 2016, and he had kickstarted asset quality review that led to the recognition that system was reeling from hidden stress. The introduction of bankruptcy laws was one of the moves to assuage the lurking stress. Patel contended these actions profoundly impacted the bank’s ability to fund the demands of the economy, where growth had been slumping.

Patel recommended the current government to stay on the course and enforce tough decisions in the face of difficulties. “Temptations to reset ‘back to the past’ should be forsaken, ” he urged. In addition, he cautioned that “episodic concerns” on stability are possible if there is “foot-dragging, or, worse, back-pedaling”. He also emphasized that short cuts and hiding the problem for future remedy will be futile and will only dealy unlocking of capital, and act as an impediment in the way of financing future investment efficiently.

Regarding NPA issue Patel said, “Matters related to ever-greening the NPA problem may surface again. Banks may be inclined to delay their decision making leading to the reemergence of the NPA crisis.”

He also aired his disappointment about the enforcement of the insolvency and the bankruptcy code, asserting it has “thrown up a worrying number of exceptions” and signs of “gaming” are evident as several major cases are held beyond the 350-day resolution window.

Speaking on the recent measures of forcing bank consolidation by the government, Patel voiced concern suggesting such mergers have “eroded” the value of the entity taking over weaker banks and called IDBI Bank a “highly problematic” organization, which was thrust upon LIC. He also added that the public sector banks have a high ratio of non-operating expenses to their earnings as compared to their private counterparts.

Kerala custodial death: Mother conducts protest march, HC orders probe against magistrate for sending a weak Rajkumar to judicial custody

For the past few days, the CPM led Kerala government has come under severe criticism after Rajkumar, a 49-year-old man from Idukki, died after he was taken into custody by the police. Demanding justice, Rajkumar’s mother Kasthuri conducted a protest march today to the Secretariat, demanding CBI probe into her son’s death.


The protest was organised by Raj Kumar Action Council, which was formed to demand justice for Raj Kumar. The had demanded a CBI probe and action against several senior officers for their alleged involvement in the case.

“They could have taken my son to court. If he was proven guilty, they could have even sent him to life imprisonment. At least that way, we would have known that he was in jail and that he was alive”, said Kasthuri while she attended the protest today.

Protesters held up placards that read, “The police officers who murdered my son Rajkumar should be arrested and charged with murder.”

Rajkumar was a native of Kolahalamedu in Vagamon. On June 12, he was arrested by Nedumkandam police for a financial fraud case. As per this report, he was kept in custody for four days before which he was presented to the court on June 16, following which he was remanded to judicial custody. On June 21, he was admitted to the Peermedu taluk hospital and declared dead soon after reaching.

After the preliminary investigation was conducted, 4 officers from the Nedumkandam police station including the SI was arrested. Six others have been transferred after discovering irregularities.

Rajkumar’s autopsy report reveals that he died from pneumonia. It also revealed that he was brutally tortured and beaten up while he was in custody. As per reports, he was so weak that he couldn’t even walk to the court. The magistrate had to walk to his jeep after which he was kept in judicial custody.

After the post-mortem, the Kerala High court had asked for a detailed report on the procedure followed by the magistrate. The court has ordered a probe against the magistrate for sending Rajkumar to judicial custody despite being in such a weak physical condition.

Yesterday, the Crime Branch of the Kerala Police arrested two other officers in connection to the case. Sub Inspector K.A. Sabu and Civil Police Officer Sajeev Antony both testified to the prolonged torture and brutal interrogation of Rajkumar in police custody.

Meanwhile, the Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan had assured that justice would be served. He said, “No one has the right to keep a person in custody illegally and beat him to death. Such persons will no longer be there in the force. The government views the latest death seriously and we will take strict action against those responsible for this”.

However, the Opposition has alleged that this the fifth case of custodial death ever since the CPM party had come to power in 2016. Senior Congres leader Ramesh Chennithala said, “the police will always protect the police. This is a brutal killing. In the last three years, there have been five custodial deaths. There has to be a judicial probe”.

The Kerala Police had also earlier said that it suspected the unholy business nexus between local leaders of the CPI(M) and law enforcers had resulted in Rajkumar’s death.

Recently, former IPS officer Sanjeev Bhatt was sentenced to life imprisonment in a custodial death case while he was the ASP in Jamnagar, Gujarat in 1989.

Stone pelted at Hanuman temple in Muzaffarnagar to desecrate idol, one person named Musa arrested

Within days of the attack on the 100-year old Durga temple by a Muslim mob in Chandni Chowk area of Delhi, yet another incident of an attack on a temple has come to light in Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh. According to a report published in Dainik Bhaskar, yesterday morning, a person belonging to the Muslim community pelted stones at the Hanuman temple in Khatauli police station area. The accused tried to desecrate the idol but failed. However, he managed to break the glass frame set up around the idol.

The accused was immediately nabbed and handed over to the police. Upon learning about the incident, members of a Hindu organization reached the temple and surrounded the police station demanding action against the culprit. The police have filed a case against the accused. According to CO Khatauli Ashish Pratap, the accused has been identified as Musa, a resident of Khurja in Bulandsheher. He had come to attend a jamaat in Khatauli. The police are investigating the case and trying to find out about his motive and reason for his visit to the area.

On the night of June 30, a mob had attacked Durga Mandir in Lal Kuan area of Chandni Chowk, Delhi, desecrating the idols inside the temple. The incident had flared up communal tension in the area. So far nine people have been arrested in connection with the incident.

International Court of Justice likely to pronounce judgment in Kulbhushan Jadhav case later this month

Coming as a ray of hope for the former naval commander’s family, the verdict in highly anticipated Kulbhushan Jadhav case is likely to be pronounced by International Court of Justice (ICJ) later this month. This news was confirmed by Raveesh Kumar, official spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA).

In a press conference on Thursday, Kumar announced ‘the decision on this matter will come in the next few weeks. There has been a cross-examination in the case. The International Court will decide on this. For now, the date has to be announced.’


According to reports, the verdict will likely come across in third week of this month.

The 47-year-old Jadhav was sentenced to death by the military court of Pakistan in April 2017 on alleged espionage charges. Pakistan’s intelligence agency ISI had kidnapped Jadhav from Iran.

The MEA has reiterated India’s commitment to making all possible efforts to “secure and protect” the rights of Jadhav.

In February 2019, advocate Harish Salve had presented a strong case for Jadhav at ICJ and had argued that Pakistan’s case was weak.

Questioning the process adopted by the military court in Pakistan, which had heard Jadhav’s case and sentenced him, Salve said that the ICJ doesn’t need experts to help it decide whether military courts in Pakistan are due process complaint.

Taking a dig at Pakistan, he said that Indian nationals are not the kind whose nationality needs to be denied. Salve added that Pakistan is being used as a safe haven by terrorists and terror organisations like Hafiz Saeed, Al-Qaeda, JeM, Dawood Ibrahim etc.

Salve said there was no doubt that Jadhav is an Indian national, and as per laws, if a foreign person is detained by a country, consular access must be granted as per article 36 of the Vienna Convention.

Salve had informed the court that India has repeatedly asked for a copy of the judgment convicting Jadhav, and the charges against him but Pakistan still refused to share the documents.

Alleging that Jadhav has become a pawn in Pakistan’s tool to divert international scrutiny from itself, Salve had concluded his arguments by suggesting that time has come for the court to make Article 36 a potent weapon for protection of human rights.

India had first approached the ICJ on May 8, 2017, for egregious violation of the provisions of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, 1963 by Pakistan in the matter.

The court had on May 18, 2017, indicated provisional measures as requested by India and passed an order obligating Pakistan to not carry out the sentence that was awarded Jadhav through a farcical trial by the military court of Pakistan.

Pakistan claimed its security forces arrested Jadhav from Balochistan province on March 3, 2016, where he had reportedly entered from Iran. However, India maintains that Jadhav was kidnapped from Iran where he had business interests after retiring from the navy. Jadhav’s sentencing had evoked a sharp reaction in India.

No Washington Post, the Nehru Gandhi family is not the Founding Dynasty of India

In a news report that highlights how little the Western world knows about Indian realities, Washington Post referred to the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty as India’s ‘Founding Dynasty’. The report, which highlights the vacuum in the leadership of India’s main opposition party, stated that with Rahul Gandhi’s resignation, the dynasty was nearing an end.

The headline only shows that Western Media buys into whatever delusions Indian liberals are selling due to ideological affinity. Far from being India’s ‘Founding Dynasty’, the Nehru-Gandhi Parivar’s contribution to Indian independence itself is extremely debatable. There were a plethora of great leaders who contributed to Indian independence and a lot of them did not even belong to the Congress party.

Forget being the founding dynasty of India, the Nehru-Gandhi family is not even the founding dynasty of the Congress party. The party was led by some of the greatest leaders India had seen before the independence of India, long before Jawaharlal Nehru became the defacto supremo of the party.

Thus, Jawaharlal Nehru was merely a leader of the Congress party at the time when the party was littered with stalwarts who fought for Indian independence. Moreover, the family is not biologically related to the designated father of the nation, Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, like many people believe. The original Gandhi did favour Nehru for the Prime Ministerial post and overruled the democratic will of the Congress party but he certainly wasn’t a part of the dynasty.

Nehru wasn’t even the most popular leader within the Congress at the time, let alone India. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel far exceeded Nehru when it came to the preference for the post of Prime Minister among senior Congress leaders. Then, there were leaders such as Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose who were sidelined by the Congress who contributed immensely to Indian independence. Therefore, to ignore the contributions of such stalwarts and label the Nehru Parivar as India’s Founding Party is sheer ignorance.

Unsurprisingly, the Washington Post is furthering the exact narrative that the Parivar and liberals in India have normalized in India over the years. Over the years, intellectuals have attributed every good thing about our country to one particular Parivar and the entire blame for all of its follies has been laid at the feet of Hindu culture. Western media, and its intellectuals, overly reliant on their Indian counterparts as they are have not bothered at all to critically evaluate such claims.

The desire to have a ‘Founding Dynasty’ for India is rooted in the Eurocentrism of the West. American intellectuals wish to see founders of nation-states in the political leaders of the time because of the fact that the USA has its own Founding Fathers. But India is completely different. As has been argued by many scholars earlier, India is more of a Civilizational state than a Nation state. Therefore, the equivalent of our country’s founding fathers lie in ancient history, not in the modern era.

However, it is easy to understand why Indian liberals would want to consider the Nehru Parivar as India’s ‘Founding Dynasty’. According to the liberal conception of the Indian state, India made a fresh beginning on the 15th of August, 1947 from a blank slate. They completely deny India’s ancient history and reject the fact that India is a natural consequence of thousands of years of Hindu Civilization.

Objectively, India is the manifestation of the Hindu conception of a nation state. As such, India is the custodian of the Hindu Civilization, the primary objective of which is to ensure the continued existence of Dharma. Hence, it is practically impossible for India to have a founding dynasty that originated in the 20th century.

Calling the Nehru Parivar India’s founding dynasty only reveals the utter lack of respect liberals have for the great and ancient history of our civilization. That it is an idea that has been accepted as Vedic Truth in the West only reflects the manner in which Indian liberals have undermined our history.

‘Early signs of fascism’ poster was displayed at the gift shop, not at the American Holocaust Memorial Museum

There has been a huge controversy surrounding the controversial speech by Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, the new poster woman of the Indian liberal circuit.

Mahua Moitra in her speech in the parliament said, “In 2017, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum put up a poster in its main lobby and it contained a list of all the signs of early fascism…”. There are a few factually incorrect and a few misleading things about this asserive statement of hers.

A 2017 fact-check by American website Snopes had found that the poster was not on display at the museum but was available in a souvenir shop. The report claims that the poster was not an exhibit but instead was at one point available in the gift shop of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. As of 2019, it is unclear whether the poster is still available for sale at the gift shop.

‘The Early Warning Signs of Fascism’ poster found at a gift shop.

The poster was not put up in the ‘main lobby’ as said by Mahua.

Moreover, the list was originally created by Laurence Britt in 2003, for an article published by Free Inquiry magazine. Britt had created this list during George W. Bush’s tenure as president of the United States with highlighting “Fourteen Defining Characteristics of Fascism”.

Subsequently, the poster was designed on the basis of Britt’s article, which later inspired Martin Longman, who himself wrote a propaganda article in Washington Monthly targetting United States President Donald Trump. In fact, Longman also misleads his readers by claiming that “If you go to the U.S. Holocaust Museum, you can see a sign hanging there that tells you what to look for if you’re worried that your country may be slipping into fascism.”

Longman, too, did not specify in his article that the poster was based on Britt’s article and that it was available at the Museum’s gift shop and that it is not a ‘sign’ that is hanging at the museum.

Mahua Moitra, who seems to be inspired by this gift shop poster, lifted seven out of the fourteen listed characteristics and tried to co-opt the same narrative into India scenario.

Indrani Mukerjea volunteers to become an approver in INX Media case, CBI court approves

Indrani Mukerjea’s plea to turn approver in the INX Media corruption case involving former finance minister P Chidambaram and his son Karti Chidambaram was today accepted by a Delhi CBI court.

The CBI endorsed her application saying that the co-owner of INX group was privy to evidence, which could help consolidate the case.

Special judge Arun Bhardwaj pardoned Indrani Mukerjea, a co-accused in the INX media case after she submitted that she voluntarily agreed to become an approver in the case.

The court has issued a production warrant for Indrani who is currently placed in Mumbai’s Byculla Jail awaiting trial for the murder of her daughter Sheena Bora.

The next date of hearing in the matter is July 11.

Last year, Indrani Mukerjea had made a sensational revelation accusing Chidambaram of trying to use his influence to get Indrani to pay a bribe to Karti to the tune of 1 million dollars. Indrani Mukerjea has claimed that she had met P Chidambaram at North Block in Central Secretariat.

The CBI had filed an FIR on May 15, 2017, against the alleged irregularities in FIPB clearance to INX Media.

Both P Chidambaram and his son Karti Chidambaram are accused in the INX Media scam which involves charges of bribery and lobbying in granting foreign investments worth Rs 300 crores to INX Media. INX Media was later known as NewsX, it was owned by Peter and Indrani Mukerjea, who are accused in the sensational Sheena Bora murder case. ED had initiated a probe on the basis of the Central Bureau of Investigation’s FIR. Chidambaram is accused of misusing his power as the finance minister to grant INX Media an FIPB clearance.

Karti was arrested by agencies last year in February for allegedly lobbying for the Mukerjeas, in order to get FIPB clearance from Finance Ministry, which at the time was under his father. The ED had also attached properties and bank deposits of Karti Chidambaram worth around Rs.54 crores in connection with the case in October last year.

Last Month, the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) gave permission to prosecute four former Congress era finance ministry officers, including former NITI Aayog CEO Sindhushree Khullar, former secretary of the Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Anup K Pujari and current principal secretary in the Himachal Pradesh government, Prabodh Saxena for their involvement in the INX media corruption case.

Fanatics at the front door: The case of Hauz Qazi

There is an Urdu couplet by late poet Dr Bashir Badr Sahab.

“Mujhe Ishtehaar si lagti hain, ye muhabbaton ki kahaaniyaan

Jo kahaa nahin voh sunaa karo, jo sunaa nahin vo kahaa karo.”

Which loosely translates to:

“I find the stories and claims of higher love which you make to me, slogans without feelings,

Thou must learn the subtle art of listening to the unsaid and saying what has never been said before.”

When I today sit thinking about the vandalism of the Hindu temple in the heart of Delhi’s capital, Hauz Qazi, and the outpouring of emotions of citizens, addressed to the newly re-elected Prime Minister Narendra Modi, somehow this couplet came to my mind. When we look at the shrill promises during the election campaign and the stony silence after this incident, I understand why I utter these lines in desperation today.

Democracy is all about giving a voice to the voiceless and representation to the faceless. This is what went missing in the initial period of the incident of Old Delhi where a Hindu temple was vandalized. Unlike crazy, violent men baying for the blood, threatening mayhem when religious symbols of any other religions is even slightly mocked at, what stood out was a steely Hindu resolve standing firmly behind the rule of law, albeit with a bitter taste of betrayal in its tongue.

Witnessing a broken nation in 1947 on account of religious fanaticism, Hindus have come a long way, wading through political apathy, mockery and even hatred as the ruling class aligned with the minorities in order to establish their secular credentials through appeasement; as the intellectuals class aligned with the ruling class in order to establish its loyalty; as the establishment-aligned to both of them to establish its unquestioning subservience.

As the hurt settles and slowly the intellectuals return to their routine manner of maligning Hindus, whether they are criminals or victims, we are reminded of the hope philosopher Will Durant expressed towards the Hindus when he wrote-

“Perhaps in return for conquest, arrogance, and spoliation, India will teach us the tolerance and gentleness of the mature mind, the quiet content of the unacquisitive soul, the calm of understanding spirit, and a unifying, pacifying love for all living things.” – Will Durant,

Hinduism has always been a faith of Dharma, the spirit of doing the right thing. It has never been a militaristic faith bent on building empires. The founders of Hindu faith have been the thinkers and philosophers, not Military Commanders.

But when the innocence of ideas collides with the cruelty of cults, what will prevail- that is the question haunting the Hindus today. What will remain when belligerence comes face to face with benevolence? Will Hinduism face the same fate which polytheist Paganism faced in Rome, in the face of an aggressive and intolerant monotheist fate which not only refused to accept it; it even refused to tolerate it to the extent that the faith which flourished for centuries was erased from human memory. These questions bother every Hindu mind, every time an idol is smashed or desecrated. In a democracy, in face of such act of barbarism, Media is supposed to report, Politics is supposed to offer assurance and administration is supposed to offer strict action.

In the case of Hauz Qazi, we saw failure on all three counts. Why did what happened, happened is another matter. It could be centuries of arrogance which looked at soft and accommodative Hindus with disdain and annoyance. It must have been always a shock to monotheists to come across a kind acceptance and a brotherly bonhomie from the overwhelmingly numerically superior polytheists of India. It seems to still confound them. Thus comes the mockery, thus comes the needless needling.

Unlike the monotheists where books define how the believers ought to behave, a religion of faith depends on belief in the ideas and principles. Every idol stands for an idea. When any religious idol is cracked, an arm of faith is fractured. When Islamist invaders arrived in India as absolute rulers, they had an abundance of land and plentiful resources suddenly available to the vagabond marauders. Why did they not use that and instead demolish the Hindu places of worship to appropriate them as their places of worship? It was for them a battle of religious supremacy. What Christians brought to the Muslim world in the form of Crusade, Muslims brought to India with fanatic military invaders. The more things change, the more they remain the same. What else could explain, even in the face of all the motivated intellectualism out to paint the Mughal Kings as secularists that not one Temple could be found in Delhi to have been built by Muslim Emperor during the regime of Mughals and other Muslim kings? Their secular love for their Hindu citizens had its boundaries.

What we find being fanned by the intellectuals in the name of motivated protests against the death of Tabrez Ansari is the propagation of the same thought. What else can explain that most prominent slogans representing the motivated protest, manufactured on a country-wide basis, promptly and expeditiously are not anti-crime; they are anti-Hinduism. It has been spread from Jharkhand to Malegaon, Bhopal, Meerut, Delhi and now it seems from the reports to Jaipur. It is not an innocent protest on Human cause. It ignores Mangru Pahan, killed by Muslims in the same state on the same day as the death of Tabrez Ansari with an obstinate denial. This is a blatantly and brazenly biased battle. This is not only a battle of muscles. It is equally supported by the fanatic faithful who carry a pen in place for sword and lead a cruel war from behind the curtains. They will hype your failures and belittle your injuries. Let us not be driven by this motivated campaign.

Let us be what we are- benevolent, kind, law-abiding and inclusive. But then, let us be vigilant and cautious. It is small things which lead to the collapse of a big idea. Let us not be dismissive about things. There is a definite design to the way things are unravelling post a definitive emergence of assertive Hinduism post-elections 2019.

I sometimes wonder when the temple of Athena in Palmyra in 385 AD had happened, how would the Pagans have viewed it? Was it to them the end of nonsense or the beginning of an end? The smallest motif of a non-military faith is important, critical and of historical significance, whether we realize it today or not. We must stand guard and not repeat the mistake of the Romans. I share an excerpt from “The Darkening Age- The Christian Destruction of The Classical World” brilliantly written by Catherine Nixey and my point being that this could be someone reading about Hinduism the same way, one century from now unless we are watchful.

“For years, marauding bands of bearded, black-robed zealots, armed with little more than stones, iron bars and an iron sense of righteousness had been terrorizing the east of the Roman Empire. Their attacks were primitive, thuggish and very effective…Their targets were temples and the attacks could be astonishingly swift. Great stone columns that had stood for centuries collapsed in an afternoon; statues that had stood for half a millennium had their faces mutilated in a moment; temples that had seen the rise of Roman Empire fell in a single day.”

This is not a new thing for us. We have faced and survived this for years. But zealots will keep coming back and we will not be able to even understand their motives, let alone duplicate that. We are not historically designed to be fanatics. We can only be steadfast about defending what we believe in and unapologetic and unembarrassed about it. Friends, Indians and Countrymen, let us be on the vigil and succeed where the Romans failed. This war will be fought in ideological battlefields.

When one lie loses currency, another will be manufactured. The objective will remain the same, maligning and demonizing a faith until the battle is won decisively and the destruction is complete. It will not be a temporary surrender. It could very well be complete annihilation, much like the Roman Pagans. Let us remain watchful and steadfast not to let this last bastion, this beautiful country of ours, fall to the fanatics at the door.