Home Blog Page 6319

Shivam Vij is the ‘Kachcha Nimbu’ of ThePrint that gets to bat from both sides

In my childhood days, I was quite fond of playing gully cricket. All the kids in our society used to assemble in the nearby lane and divide ourselves into two teams with an equal number of players. If the number was odd, the last player who wasn’t picked by either of the sides was called as ‘Kachcha Nimbu’ who got to bat twice, from both the teams. ‘Kachcha Nimbu’ was looked down upon by others with disdain as he was considered a weakling.

In the run-up to the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, I came across an article by Shivam Vij published in the ‘neutral journalist’ Shekhar Gupta’s The Print. In the piece published on March 12, 2019, Vij drew out the inferences from recent developments in the current affairs to claim that Narendra Modi losing 2019 might be a real possibility.

Shivam Vij predicting Modi losing 2019

For 3 excruciating days, I was tormented ipso facto that PM Modi might be losing ground and his invincibility might be severely threatened. But on March 15, I read another article by Vij, asserting that Modi Wave in Uttar Pradesh is as strong as it was in 2014 and 2017.

Shivam Vij predicting Modi winning in 2019

Initially, I was flummoxed, I read both the articles twice. Has Modi turned around things which were looking rather bleak in just 3 days? I was at my wit’s end to decide which analysis to be believed. In the end, I chose to believe the latest one, thinking that Vij might have got it wrong in the earlier one.

For the next thirteen days, I was upbeat that PM Modi would come back to power based on many reports and TV shows. Of course, the detractors painted a gloomy picture for PM Modi’s return but their contentions were consistent and have remained the same since 2014. Then, on March 28, I read another piece in the Print by Shivam Vij arguing that Akhilesh Yadav is a winner even before the elections have begun.

Shivam Vij declaring Akhilesh Yadav a clear winner for 2019

Once again doubts crept into my mind. Has Akhilesh Yadav done something in the last 13 days that has changed the dynamics on the ground? Part of me wanted to believe that the one who couldn’t do anything in 5 years of his government, what is he capable of doing in a mere 13 days with Yogi at the helm in UP to effect such a massive turnaround. I vigorously scoured news websites, searched for any radical measure or promise made by SP-BSP alliance in UP but found nothing worth considering.

In just a matter of 16 days, Shivam Vij completed a sine wave, from the trough predicting Modi’s imminent loss to the peak claiming that the Modi wave in UP is as strong as it was in 2014 and 2017 to trough again asserting that Akhilesh Yadav is winning the Uttar Pradesh even before the elections.

If one has a cursory glance at the articles penned by Shivam Vij, it becomes amply clear that he has often passed prejudiced opinions under the garb of profound analysis only to take a 180 degree turn a few days later. In 2018, Shivam wrote an article on the dubious political operations of Cambridge Analytica in India. A few days later, he wrote an article rubbishing the claims that it was involved in any political work.

Shivam Vij giving inside story on what Cambridge Analytica did in India
Shivam Vij claiming Cambridge Analytica did nothing in India

Yesterday, as the results poured in, I had a keen look at the numbers coming in from Uttar Pradesh. The numbers revealed that it was not just a reinvigorated Modi wave but a full-blown Tsunami that shook the entire country and swept away Kings and their clans.

The result reminded me of the ‘Kachcha Nimbu’ that Shivam Vij is. The only solace for Kachcha Limbu in those good old days was that the batting came in both the innings of the match. If you flunked in one inning, you can make up for that in your next one from the opposite team. However, the ‘Kachcha Nimbu’ always lacked conviction in his efforts, knowing full well that if he failed on one occasion, he has other to capitalise.

Perhaps, Vij appears to operate on that principle. His myriad volte-faces suggest that his opinions are often based on frivolous analyses. But, he can claim consolation in the fact that one of his predictions- Modi wave in 2019 is as strong as it was in 2014 and 2017 eventually turned out true. Shivam Vij’s flagrantly contradictory articles claim all possible outcomes of an event, maybe so he could later claim that he was right in 50% of the instances.

Back in those days, we struck a compromise to accommodate extra players by altering inherent rules and norms governing the game. Sometimes, we did it because the ‘Kachcha Nimbu’ offered us to use his new cricket kit, the other times we did it to avoid hurting someone’s sentiments. In the case of The Print coming up with Shivam Vij’s articles that contradict each other in a matter of days, I am unsure which policy is at work.

Rahul Gandhi should not fire his data analysis chief, but promote him. Here is why

It is introspection time for Congress President Rahul Gandhi who lost his ‘family seat’ of Amethi to BJP’s Smriti Irani. That the party managed to go from 44 in 2014 to 52 in 2019 is hardly anything to celebrate when the party president had to go for a ‘safe seat’ Wayanad to secure his entry into the Lok Sabha.

And while he reflects over what went wrong, in India or at a secret location abroad, here is a suggestion for him. Even if he does not put down his papers himself, other than firing his social media head, who tweets on Rahul’s behalf like a sixteen-year-old high on SnapChat filters, Rahul Gandhi should promote his data analytics head.

His data, unlike like the dubious database with faulty ‘fact-checker’ where he was a found trustee of, is not quite off the mark.

In January this year, he gave an interview to The Hindu where he had said that the BJP will not win any of the large states it had won in 2014.

Praveen Chakravarty’s prediction in January 2019

In his interview to The Hindu, Chakravarty had predicted that his ‘data’ will spring a surprise in Uttar Pradesh. He had come to this conclusion after looking at every seat in detail and every social combination and analysing the sentiment of voters who had voted for BJP in 2014.

BJP did not just win most of the states it had won in 2014 elections, but it even won more. The BJP and its allies managed to get a bigger victory. In Bihar, the NDA won 39 out of 40 seats, completely wiping out fodder scam convict Lalu Prasad Yadav’s RJD. Even Lalu’s daughter could not win the Pataliputra seat she contested from.

In West Bengal, where the BJP had won 2 seats in 2014, the party managed to secure as many as 18 seats. The TMC is reduced to 22 seats and Congress managed 2, two seats less than previous elections.

Regarding his prophecy in Uttar Pradesh, Chakravarty says they had analysed voters’ sentiments, especially those who voted for the BJP in 2014. No wonder in 2019 the party president had to contest from a ‘safe seat’ of Wayanad because the seat which has been a family bastion for decades appeared difficult to retain. And as results show, he was correct. Rahul Gandhi lost Amethi by over 50,000 votes to BJP’s Smriti Irani.

Chakravarty further stated in January that the BJP victory in 2014 was a ‘black swan’ which could not be repeated. This is also turning out to be true since the BJP not only repeated it but even managed to outdo itself in terms of voter share. The ‘black swan’ managed to get almost 50% vote share, way above the 31% it got in 2014. One out of every two people who voted, voted for Modi. Chakravarty again proven right.

He had further said that Maharashtra was the ‘angriest’ state as per their survey. The BJP-Shiv Sena alliance in the state has won 41 out of the 48 seats in the state, thereby repeating their 2014 performance. However, Congress which got two seats in 2014, could retain only one. On the brighter side, it is only 50% loss.

It wasn’t as bad as Rajasthan, where there is a Congress government in the state, but it could not deliver a single seat in the Lok Sabha. However, it would be a good idea to ask him about the data in his possession which showed that the BJP could not ‘reverse the tide’ in Rajasthan. Because, clearly, the data didn’t work out there. But he is kind of known to have a divine vision where, much like how IndiaSpend works ‘magic’ with numbers for the shady hate tracker.


Like this one time where he decided not to buy a book because he formed his opinion about it based on the author’s interview.

Hence, maybe it is time for the Congress President to promote Chakravarty so that by the time the youth leader becomes a veteran leader, he could suggest how the next generation of Nehru-Gandhi-Vadra family could revive the grand old party.

Why Modi Matters: Sadhvi Pragya and the definitive shift in the Overton Window of the Country

The results of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections are historic by any definition of the word. Narendra Modi became the first Prime Minister after Indira Gandhi in 1971 to return to power with an even greater mandate than before. In the five years of his rule, we saw a definite shift of the country towards the right. In the next five years, we can be certain that this shift will be further consolidated.

The most significant indication of the shift in the country’s Overton Window came in 2017 when Yogi Adityanath was appointed the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh. A saffron-clad monk, the Peethadhish of Gorakhnath Temple, working as the head of the government of the country’s most populous state was the greatest indication of the direction India was heading in.

One would have thought Yogi Adityanath’s appointment as Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh was as far Narendra Modi and Amit Shah would go towards shifting the country’s Overton Window. But they went a step further when they nominated Sadhvi Pragya from Bhopal in Madhya Pradesh, a traditionally safe seat for the BJP. The BJP President maintained that it was the saffron party’s ‘Satyagraha’ against the Hindu Terror initiative of the Congress party. With her stellar victory over Digvijay Singh, a close aide of Congress President Rahul Gandhi, that appears to be going quite well.

Narendra Modi’s spectacular victory only confirms what has been known for a while. Hindutva is now the mainstream ideology in the country. The secularism of yore has been relegated to the dustbins of history. The victory also shows that the country will no longer be held hostage by the opinions of the Champagne Socialists. Nor will the Compulsive Contrarians hold any sway over public opinion.

There are numerous reasons why Narendra Modi’s victory is significant. However, the most significant perhaps is his unwavering commitment towards the public celebration of his Hindu faith. After the hectic schedule of campaigning for the elections, one of the first things he did was to trek to Kedarnath to meditate in the snowy caves of the Himalayas. In doing so, he reaffirmed his commitment to the ancient faith of our ancestors.

There are numerous other hallowed narratives that are threatened by Narendra Modi’s continued dominance of electoral politics. The aura surrounding the Nehru-Gandhi Parivar has already been blown to bits. In the years to follow, it will suffer considerably more. And one hopes that by the time his reign is over, the aura surrounding Mahatma Gandhi too is diminished.

While Narendra Modi personally has committed himself firmly towards the ideals of Gandhi, he has interpreted Gandhi quite differently than others. Instead of allowing Gandhian principles to cloud his vision of realpolitik, he has firmly kept them constrained to matters such as Swachh Bharat.

While it appears certain that Narendra Modi will not challenge Gandhi’s legacy himself, as the recent controversy surrounding Sadhvi Pragya shows, his continued dominance in power gives those who will question Gandhi the confidence and the voice to do so. While Sadhvi Pragya was herself criticized for her remarks, it sparked a debate around Gandhi’s own conduct during Independence and his deplorable approach to Hindu-Muslim riots and perverse sexual experiments with women far younger than himself.

Sadhvi Pragya did eventually offer an apology after much public outrage. However, one thing appears certain, the Lok Sabha now has at least has one member who is not as averse to criticising Gandhi and evaluating the real contributions he made to the country. It also reflects the opinions of a significant section of the Indian population who have their own very valid reasons to dislike Gandhi.

Sadhvi Pragya’s victory over Digvijay Singh is particularly symbolic of the cultural shift in the country. Digvijay was the person who had attended the launch of a book that blamed the RSS for the 26/11 Mumbai Terror Attacks. And he was defeated by someone who was a victim of his party’s attempt to create a narrative of Hindu Terror.

All of this is indicative of the fact that the Overton Window of the country has shifted comprehensively. The Prime Minister in his victory speech himself said that the brand of secularism that has been the Holy Grail of Indian Politics has been discarded once and for all by the Indian electorate. Our country will no longer be held hostage to the brand of Secularism that demands its Hindu citizenry to be ashamed of their heritage.

If political parties are to succeed in India, they can no longer afford to embrace the toxic brand of minority appeasement they have latched on to for decades. As others have pointed out, if any political party can hope to stop the Modi-Shah juggernaut, then it’s a Right Wing Hindu Nationalist party. And that is the greatest evidence that the Overton Window of the country has moved firmly towards the Right.

This is exactly why Modi matters. The symbolism of an abashed polytheist heading the world’s largest democracy is not lost on anyone. His victory was even celebrated by certain polytheists from other countries of the world who see in India the hope for the revival of polytheism in their own respective countries.

In the second term, Narendra Modi’s commitment towards the Hindu faith must translate into concrete legislative measures to free the Hindu citizenry of the discriminatory laws against them. That would be the best possible way for Narendra Modi to ensure his own legacy in the annals of Indian history.

Every BJP vote in Bengal is owed to the ground level workers who have given their lifeblood for the saffron surge

Ever since pre-colonial times, West Bengal has been the hub of all things cultural, artistic, and musical. It’s the land of Rabindranath Tagore, Nandalal Bose and Satyajit Ray. A land of people who are generally known to be gentle, soft-spoken ‘Bhadraloks’ with a special liking for ‘Rosogolla’ and ‘Rabindra Sangeet’.

Though aestheticism has been an integral part of Bengal, the state has as much been a hotbed of political violence. In fact, violence has been such an intrinsic part of Bengal that a subaltern version of the history of Bengal can be written through the kind of violence the people of Bengal have witnessed so far.

Political violence has invariably relapsed in Bengal every two decades but over the last decade, political violence has taken a new shape here. The poll-related violence in West Bengal under Mamata Banerjee does not seem to abate.

In the recently concluded Lok Sabha elections, the Bhartiya Janta Party created history in West Bengal. It made successful inroads by securing 18 out of 42 seats in Mamata’s Bengal. This success has, however, not come easily for the party. Innumerable  BJP Karyakarta’s have given their lives to make BJP’s surge possible.

Trinamool Congress goons under Mamata Banerjee’s realm have carried out targeted killings of the ground-level workers, mostly students, teachers, labourers, farmers, agricultural workers and small shopkeepers and this time the brunt of most of the ire was borne by BJP workers in Bengal as they were standing as the biggest threat to Mamata government.

Dozens of BJP workers and leaders have been brutally attacked or killed before and during the election seasons in Bengal. This is an attempt to remember some of the incidents of brutal violence done under an authoritarian regime in Bengal.

During the 6th phase of the recently concluded Lok Sabha elections, a BJP worker named Raman Singh was found dead in Jhargram. The BJP had alleged he was attacked by Trinamool workers.

In another separate incident, two BJP workers, Ananta Guchait and Ranjit Maity, were shot at in Bhagabanpur of East Medinipur.

Similarly, a BJP worker in Bankura was severely injured with multiple injuries on his head and body after bricks were hurled at him by TMC goons.

Bankura Violence, Courtesy: ANI

A BJP worker named Prashant Sharma was brutally beaten up by some unidentified people in Frasor Road during phase 5 of the Lok Sabha elections.


Similarly, BJP candidate from Barrackpore, Arjun Singh, was reportedly attacked by goons associated with the Trinamool Congress. BJP District President in Hooghly, Pranab Mondal Saha, had alleged that he was thrashed by Trinamool goons while he was on his way to meet a fellow member of the party Khokon Biswas.

The 22-year-old BJP Youth Wing worker, son of a BJP member of the local gram panchayat, was killed in West Bengal’s Purulia district. His body was found hanging from a tree at Senabona village in Purulia on April 18, 2019.

Shishu Pal Shahish, Courtesy: My Nation

In the month of March, Patanu Mondal (28), a BJP worker was shot dead inside his house as he was deep in sleep with his wife and eight-month-old daughter when a few men entered the house and opened fire.

In another case of political intolerance, a BJP worker Apurba Chakraborty was brutally beaten up by TMC goons in Islampur, West Bengal. Apurba Chakraborty was returning from a wedding ceremony of his relative in Gulshan area of Islampur ps when he was assaulted by TMC goons assaulted. He was admitted to the hospital in critical condition.

BJP worker Apurba Chakraborty, Courtesy: Jansatta

Shaktipada Sardar, a local BJP leader from Mandir Bazar in South 24 Parganas district in West Bengal had been brutally hacked to death last year in July. According to reports, the 45-year-old Sardar was attacked with sharp weapons while returning from work and was left bleeding in a critical condition.

In another case of chilling political violence in the state of West Bengal, a 32-year-old BJP worker identified as Dulal Kumar was found hanging from a high tension electric pole. This incident had been reported from Dabha village in the Balrampur region of state’s Purulia district. Following this incident, the Bengal BJP pinned the blame on TMC goons, whom it accused of executing the order of Mamata’s nephew Abhishek Banerjee.

Dulal Kumar, Courtesy: The Statesmen

Similarly, in May last year, a young BJP worker named Trilochan Mahato was found hanging from a tree in the jungle near the village of Balarampur. According to BJP, Mahato was dragged out of his house by masked goons. They had also alleged that he had been murdered because of his active participation in West Bengal Panchayat elections that were marred by rampant violence, rigging, booth capturing, ballot box capturing and intimidation of voters.

Trilochan Mahato, Courtesy: Times Now Hindi

Exactly a month after Dulal Kumar and Trilochan Mahato found dead in West Bengal’s Purulia district, the body of another BJP party worker was found floating in a lake in Murshidabad district. Dharmaraj Hazra, 54 years old, was found dead in a lake with his hands and feet tied with a rope. His body was recovered from the lake in Shaktipur village.

Dharmaraj Hazra, Courtesy: Times Now

Taking acts of savagery to a whole new level, the TMC goons had reportedly raped a pregnant relative of a BJP candidate. In another incident, a BJP supporter was publicly and brutally thrashed by a TMC Minister.

In fact, due to several such incidences of savagery by the ruling Trinamool Congress in the state, there were reports of BJP leaders fleeing West Bengal. There were reports that the state unit of the BJP in Jharkhand has provided shelter to at least 80 members of the party who were allegedly evicted from their villages by the TMC.

Political violence has been a harsh reality in Mamata Banerjee’s Bengal. The Panchayat elections and now the Lok Sabha elections in the state were riddled with extreme violence and numerous cases of murder. The gruesome and blood-curdling savagery carried out by TMC cadres is no less violent than the crimes of a terrorist organisation. While these few incidents like the ones mentioned above have been noticed, there are several other incidents which have not found its place in the media space.

Mamata Banerjee and her goons have tried everything possible to stop BJP making inroads in Bengal. However, the sacrifices made by these ground-level workers, who stood by their leadership like rocks, have paid off as BJP won 18 seats, touching an impressive double figure in Bengal for the first time.

No AltNews, Zakir Musa was not a ‘separatist’, he was a terrorist who wanted to establish an Islamic Caliphate in Kashmir

Pratik Sinha, the founder of dubious ‘fact-checking’ website AltNews, was found whitewashing the crimes of a dreaded Jihadi terror leader by labelling him as a mere separatist on Twitter. On 23rd May, Jihadi Terrorist Zakir Musa was killed by Indian security forces yesterday in Jammu and Kashmir. Musa was the head of Ansar Ghazwat-ul-Hind, a cell of terrorist organisation Al-Qaeda.

Although the news of neutralisation of a most wanted terrorist was welcomed by most people, some people, including left-liberal journalists, could not digest the news. One such journalist was Arfa Khanum Sherwani, senior editor of propaganda website The Wire. When BTVI editor Aditya Raj Kaul shared the news with a comment that it is a win for Indian Democracy, Arfa could not tolerate that and said that it is tough to differentiate between RW trolls and RW journalists now. She suggested that only right-wing trolls want deadly terrorists dead.


After her tweet, News 24 editor Manak Gupta posted a light-hearted tweet in Hindi responding to one of Arfa’s Hindi tweet containing the word ‘Musa’, which was posted on 22nd May. He had written that he (Musa) will not come now, and if anyone wishes to meet him, will go away from this earth. In the same tweet, he had clarified in brackets that Arfa was not talking about Zakir Musa, and included an emoji to indicate that it was a joke.


But for Pratik Sinha, who these days do fact-check on memes and photo manipulations done as jokes, this was not enough. He accused that Manak Gupta had invited a troll army to the Wire journalist because her tweet contained the word Musa.

Along with that, most shockingly, Sinha also referred to Zakir Mura as a separatist, not as a terrorist. Although the matter may look trivial on the surface, it is not. Separatist means a person who supports the separation of a region from a larger region it is part of. Separatists can use various methods to place their demand, and some of such methods may not be against the law. For example, there are separatists who use only non-violent methods.

Screenshot from Twitter

On the other hand, Terrorists create terror through the use of violence. They target both civilians and armed forces. More importantly, Islamic terrorists like Zakir Musa create terror in order to establish Islamic rule. The jihadis operating in Kashmir are specifically motivated by the goal of creating an Islamic Caliphate in the region, which can’t be defined as simple separatism.

Therefore, calling a terrorist leader a separatist leader is not only misleading, but it also whitewashes the crimes against humanity done by the terrorists.

The Left has lost its deposit. It is time for the Right to fight Modi

With great power comes great responsibility; a responsibility not so much of the all-powerful leader but, rather, of his followers.

The Left has lost its deposit. It is time for the Right to fight Modi.

Over these past five years, not a day has gone by when the Left – that holds a monopoly on the media narrative in India – principally through inbreeding and entrenched mediocrity and a collectivised belief in loony tomes – not a day has gone by when the Left hasn’t indulged in wanton propaganda, selectivism, scare-mongering, gangrenous puffery, Hinduphobia, shameless hypocrisy, and the institutionalisation of false-equivalence. From spreading misinformation and fake-news, to pillorying institutions like the Supreme Court and the Armed Forces, nothing was left to chance.

Like the proverbial Proustian cup-cake, these so-called Mothers of History and Fathers of Geography reminisced over past comforts, given them by their favourite dynasty, and how they yearned for it. They remembered the untold rewards through fellowships and committee memberships. They remembered the wah-wahs and the requests for encores at fixed television debates on nationalised television channels. They remembered PMO entourages and business-class trips to places they had never previously seen. They remembered the dinner parties and the book launches and the giggles and the nibbles. They remembered the life they had led, but not the life they had written about. They remembered a cocoon. And slowly, over the years, they remembered wrapping the cocoon with their silky threads over and over and over again till it became tighter and tighter. This they remembered. But life under wraps only stifled the pupa, preventing it from transforming into something that could take wings.

The cocoon got unwrapped in the last five years, leaving only a withered mass of putrefying gunge; hanging from a branch; dripping slime; about to detach. But still, they hoped for wings to sprout.

It only got worse in the last few months. These masked and bibbed writers jabbed and parried, jabbed and parried, rattling their sabres in a vigorous bout of eleventh-hour fencing. It was almost as though these Achtung Journalists and fly-by-night intellectuals took it upon themselves to save the Idea of India from the talons of Fascism and Totalitarianism. They dreamt of swastikas and toothbrush moustaches, they heard the approaching rumble of goose steps, they watched their beloved India turn into a Pakistan, but they refused to wake up to reality. They were the new Buffalo Soldiers – stolen from Communism, brought to Secularism; Fighting on arrival, fighting for survival.

In response, the Right wrote thousands of rebuttals, filled with logical counter-points and rationale, at times rife with anger, even retribution. But as the Navajo saying goes, you can’t wake a person pretending to be asleep. These rebuttals helped little. That is until one single, solitary rebuttal brought the rotten, decaying cocoon crashing down. It was a rebuttal that could not be read, only heard; could not be watched, only felt. It arrived yesterday. Modi wrote it.

No other rebuttal is now necessary. The Right has no enemy left. Fools are those who do not get weary from battling an idiotic adversary. Ignore and withdraw. Your battles now lie elsewhere.

Modi 2.0 heralds a new beginning for India and her people. It must not be allowed to cultivate the habits of Modi 1.0. It must not be allowed to rest its head on the cushion of nepotism and fawning and servitude and social Darwinism. It must be taken to task when it fails on its promises. The criticism by the Left cannot be trusted or believed in. Who else but the Right to help the government keep to the straight and narrow?

Doubtless, this would be difficult. The Right has not criticised Modi except on rare occasions, and worse, it has charged on galloping horses and spears drawn at those who are neither Left nor Right (call them non-Left) when they have criticised Modi. To be sure, it is the Left and not the Right that cannot take criticism from among its own. The Right works on Darwinian principles and fighting for supremacy of ideas come naturally – a fundamental and glorious reason why there can never be a Right-wing ecosystem.

To build a Right-wing Ecosystem would be to replicate a Left-wing ecosystem. Nothing could be more tragic. Ecosystems are tribes; sooner or later they demand their pound of flesh. Slowly, they sow ideas of brotherhood and dependence in an intellectual who has just joined them and then begins the slide. If India is to encourage the growth of intellectualism, it must understand that ecosystems, as we know them, are to be discouraged. It must understand the role of a patron. You can support a musician by organising a concert for him, but you can’t ask him to perform your mediocre creation. And this is what all ecosystems do. They turn into herds, and their members into little lambs, afraid to speak their minds, fearful of the consequences, scared that the flow of cash or kind might ebb. Ecosystems ensconce and guard mediocrity, then promote and help it prosper. Instead, the Right must now cultivate nonconformists and dissenters among its own fold.

There is a reason why this author is writing these words for Opindia. No one but no one has worked more to demolish the perfidy of the Left in recent past, than Opindia and its motley gang of the founder, editor, and gifted writers – all of whom are true Liberals. It was vital if not a crucial task and one that has been accomplished satisfactorily. It must now walk away from the scarred battlefield and reinvent itself. There is a need for Opindia 2.0. For every article that lauds the actions of Modi 2.0, let there be one written by someone from the Right that is critical of that same action. The space that was erstwhile occupied in rebutting the dissenting Left and its perfidious ideas must now be handed over to the dissenting Right.

So, warriors of the Right: arise, drop your swords and pick up your pens and celebrate true dissent as much as you celebrate true democracy. There is a job to do, and you are needed like never before. Withdraw the middle- and lift the forefinger. And point it at Modi when needed.

***

Author’s note: Few lines on the machinations of the Left Ecosystem have been taken from the author’s essays published earlier.

No bilateral talks with Pakistan till it keeps supporting terrorism: India’s envoy to the USA

Hours after Prime Minister Narendra Modi was re-elected in the 2019 Lok Sabha polls, India’s Ambassador to the US Harsh Vardhan Shringla told a group of American reporters that India will not hold talks with Pakistan until it gives up its state policy of supporting terrorism.

Mr Shringla said that the onus is on Pakistan to change its state policy of terrorism in order to improve the relations between the two countries. The envoy said that as long as supporting terrorism is a state policy of Pakistan, no Indian government will get a mandate from the people to reach out to that country.

The reporters enquired about the future of India-Pakistan relations to which Mr Shringla said the day Pakistan adjourns terrorism as a means of achieving its end, “I think the government will be within its mandate” to start a better relationship with its western neighbour.

“I think it is the desire of every Indian to have good relations with Pakistan. You see our relations with Bangladesh, you see our relations with Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Maldives, Afghanistan. We have excellent relationships,” he said.

He also added that PM Modi’s inclusive policy of Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas is meant for the development of all, including India’s neighbours.

“We have committed USD27 billion to the development of our neighbourhood and Pakistan is welcome to join. But it cannot be pursuing a policy of supporting terrorism on the one hand and then trying to talk of peace on the other. That double handed policy is not something that we can deal with anymore,” said Shringla.

Yesterday, Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan congratulated PM Modi’s victory in the Lok Sabha election. Although he wrote about working together for peace in the region he makes no mention of the terrorism that still emanates from the country.


India had suspended bilateral talks with Pakistan after the URI attacks. Pakistan’s new PM Imran Khan had initially tried to make grandiose statements regarding bilateral talks but India has been firm on its stand that no bilateral talks will happen till Pakistan continues to sponsor terrorism on Indian soil.

On Wednesday, Pakistan media had reported a ‘meeting’ between External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj and Pakistan counterpart Shah Mehmood Qureshi saying the two sat beside each other while attending the meeting of the Council of Foreign Ministers (CFM) of Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO). However, the MEA has clarified there was only an exchange of pleasantries and no formal meeting took place between the two leaders.

MEA has also said that the report of both the leaders sitting together was “factually incorrect and misleading”. “The seating arrangement at SCO follows the Russian alphabet system which does not put India and Pakistan together. This is standard practice at SCO meetings,” they added.

The story of BJP’s rise and rise in West Bengal: The story starts not in 2019 but 2017 Ram Navami

The Bharatiya Janata Party has secured 18 seats from West Bengal in the 2019 Lok Sabha Elections. They made a gain of 16 seats from its 2014 tally. The BJP’s rise in Bengal has been nothing short of spectacular. To truly be able to gauge the magnitude of a saffron surge in the state, one needs only take a look at the Assembly Election results in 2016.

The 2016 Assembly Elections

In the last state elections, BJP contested in a total of 291 seats, managing to win only 3 with a vote-share of 10.16%. It was a distant third in a three-way battle between the Trinamool Congress, the Communist Congress and itself.

And no one could have doubted that the dismal result was exactly what the BJP deserved at that point. The state unit was in disarray, there was no visible organizational strength and more importantly, it didn’t appear as if the BJP itself believed they had a chance.

It is important to appreciate the massive organizational strength that the BJP developed in an extremely short period of time. Until the end of the Assembly Elections, saffron was virtually nonexistent in the state as a viable alternative. There were no college campuses or universities where ABVP or BJYM could be perceived to be a force of strength. Even among the youth, support was nonexistent and almost every youngster treated the saffron alternative with derision.

It was only after the Assembly Elections were over that the BJP started working on developing its organizational infrastructure in the state massively. And it happened pretty quickly. BJP Karyakartas started becoming a lot more visible around college campuses and universities, supporters started getting a lot more vocal than they previously were, foot-soldiers of the party became really active on the ground and by the end of 2016, it appeared certain that the BJP was going to become a very potent force in the state and sooner rather than later.

The Watershed Moment for Bengal Politics

The watershed moment for Bengal politics, of course, was the Ram Navami of 2017. The 5th of April, 2017, was the day when the future of West Bengal politics was changed forever. I still remember the day quite clearly. I remember wondering, “How the hell did the BJP manage to get so many people on the streets?!”

Contrary to the narrative peddled by certain people that the BJP had brought people from other parts of the country to participate in the rallies in Bengal, at least in Kolkata, in the various parts of it I was witness to, it was quite clear to me that the people were overwhelmingly Bengalis. There were people from other regions, too, but the overwhelming majority of people, at least in Kolkata, were Bengalis.

That day, the whole of Kolkata was decked up in Saffron, as if the entire city awaited the arrival of the King of Ayodhya Himself. The events that transpired then and the week that followed made it amply career that Mamata Banerjee’s primary opposition in the state will no longer be cloaked in red. They will be wearing saffron.

The massive Ram Navami rallies, apart from being a great show of strength, also had a deep psychological impact on everyone. It made it clear to every single citizen in the state that the BJP was now a viable alternative. The Left was thrashed by Trinamool Congress in consecutive state elections, Congress was never really a credible alternative. Thus, for those who were sick and tired of Mamata’s Sultanate, there remained only one viable alternative, the same one which was on a rise nationally and had as its face a leader with great personal credibility. From that point on, the BJP never looked back.

The Panchayat Elections of 2018

Thus, by Ram Navami, 2018, it became abundantly clear once and for all that Trinamool’s primary opposition was the Bharatiya Janata Party. Things reached a point that even Mamata Banerjee’s men started their own Ram Navami processions and some among them thought it was a good idea to pit Hanuman against Rama. Panchayat Elections were around the corner and the atmosphere was electric.

The 2018 Panchayat Elections saw Trinamool embracing tactics that were the hallmark of the Left regime. Extreme violence and voter intimidation became the norm. Numerous BJP Karyakartas were murdered or thrashed. Even candidates were not spared. The state police were accused of colluding with the government in suppressing the BJP in the state through threats and other means. Despite all of that, the BJP managed to improve greatly upon its 2013 performance.

The Trinamool Congress won an unprecedented number of seats uncontested as well, which was further indicative of the violent nature of Mamata’s regime. While even Trinamool managed to improve upon its earlier performance, the Left and Congress were utterly decimated. Thus, it became clear once and for all that Trinamool’s primary opposition going forward would be the BJP.

The Saffron Surge in 2019

By 2019, ‘Jai Shri Ram’ had transformed into Bengal’s ‘Bidrohor Chitkar’ (cry of protest) against the oppressive rule of Mamata Banerjee. After years of tyranny, first by the Left, them by Trinamool, Bengali Hindus found refuge at the feet of Rama. There were attempts made to portray Rama as an ‘outsider God’ who had no connection with Bengal, however, Hindus know that’s not the case. Therefore, such attempts never worked. As more and more attempts were made to pit Hindus of varied ethnicity against each other, ‘Jai Shri Ram’ only became more and more of a unifying factor.

The Youth was no longer overwhelmingly averse towards the BJP as well. In fact, on social media and elsewhere, it was the youth of Bengal which campaigned greatly for the success of the party. It is a testament of the cultural change that Narendra Modi has brought about in the country that even in Bengal, ‘Mandir Wahi Banayengey’ became an extremely relevant slogan among its youth.

It’s important to understand that the BJP could never have gained ground in Bengal if they did not speak of issues which hold great significance for Hindus of Bengal. Illegal immigration, minority appeasement, communal violence, all these issues are of significant importance to the Bengal electorate. Unfortunately, however, there’s only one party on the horizon which voices these concerns and promises to address them. Therefore, it is important to remember that valid concerns of the Bengal electorate was not addressed by any other party and the BJP rose to prominence in the state riding on the promise to address them.

Prominent Leaders of the State Unit

While every victory is a team effort, some leaders of the state unit deserve special credit. The president of the BJP’s state unit, Dilip Ghosh, who won his seat from Medinipur, has worked contributed immensely towards the BJP’s rise. While he can be eccentric at times, he was at the forefront of numerous rallies and including the Ram Navami celebrations in 2017.

Locket Chatterjee, BJP’s winning candidate from the Hooghly Lok Sabha constituency, too, deserves a lot of credit for her stellar campaign. Her personal security was threatened when goons allegedly associated with the TMC vandalized a house she was lodged at during campaigning. Yet, she emerged victoriously.

Roopa Ganguly, who can be accused of being overly dramatic at times and more theatrical than necessary, she too contributed in her own meaningful way. She was a victim of physical violence herself and yet, she did not quit.

While it is true that the state unit of the BJP still needs some work to be capable enough to win the 2021 Assembly Elections, it is very much on the right track and much much stronger than it was earlier. Along the way, quite a few Trinamool strongmen have jumped ship which has further augmented BJP’s standing in the state. Going forward, it appears Trinamool will suffer even more defections which will weaken its ground even more.

A New Dawn

As of today, the BJP is the political party that is on the rise and Trinamool appears to be on its way down in West Bengal. Whether Mamata Banerjee will be able to stem the BJP’s growth in her home turf remains to be seen. She has failed spectacularly. With her unabashed minority appeasement, it is a fact that she has alienated large sections of the Hindu community. And these disgruntled sections of the Hindu community, which grows in strength every day, is responsible for the BJP’s rise in the state. Henceforth, Bengal politics will not be polarized along the lines of political ideology as it was earlier. The fates of parties will be decided by the extent of religious polarization among the electorate.

The Dawn of this new era of Religious Polarization in West Bengal is further indicated by the utter collapse of the Left. It is a fact that traditional voters of the Left have crossed over to the BJP in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections and this crossover has largely been motivated by concerns that revolve around their Hindu identity. While certain intellectuals might blame the BJP for this polarization, the fact of the matter is, while the saffron party’s rise is fueled by it, it’s not responsible for it in any manner whatsoever.

While great credit must go to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Amit Shah and the respective leaders of the state unit for BJP’s stellar victory in Bengal, the victory overwhelmingly belongs to the cadres on the ground who sacrificed their lives and risked physical violence but ensured BJP’s victory at great personal cost. The top echelons of the party might come up with all its grand plans but at the end of the day, it’s the simple Karyakarta with his resolute belief who implements it.

People have severely underestimated the extent to which Bengal is fertile for the politics of Hindutva. It is the land of Sri Aurobindo, Swami Vivekananda and Shyama Prasad Mukherjee. Hindutva could be kept away from Bengal for long but not forever. After Tripura, another state dominated by Bengalis, voted in a BJP government, it was only a matter of time before West Bengal started showing a similar trend.

Hindutva only needed a face with great personal credibility and an aura of authority around him to succeed in Bengal. And when Narendra Modi became its face, it was only a matter of time. Because Bengal politics, at the end of the day, has always been dominated by personalities and their individual credibility has always been enough to earn their parties the victories.

BJP’s great victory in Bengal shows that Bengali Hindus have no tolerance for the attempts to pit them against Hindus of other regions. It was a great slap on the face of people who wanted to replicate the Dravidianist model in Bengal.

History may remember the 23rd of May, 2019 as the day when the future of Bengal Politics changed forever. However, it was on the 5th of April, 2017, on the auspicious day of Ram Navami that the seeds of it were sown.

2019 Elections: Which exit polls pollster predicted the election result best?

If you are as curious about which pollster predicted the election tally best among all the gazillion pollsters who conducted exit polls then this is the post for you.

Let’s jump in straight to numbers:

NDAUPAOthersNDA 2014UPA 2014Others 2014
Final Declared Seats354969233658149
Republic-CVoter Exit287128127---
Republic-JankiBaat Exit305124113---
TimesNow-VMR Exit306132104249148146
News18-IPSOS Exit3368212427697148
IndiaToday-Axis Exit3479397272115156
NewsX Neta Exit242164137---
News24 Exit350959734070133
IndiaTV CNX Exit300120122289101148
VDP Associates Exit33311594---
ABP-Nielsen Exit27713013527497165
News Nation Exit286122134---

Interpretations could well vary but if I read this correct, News 24 Chanakya poll is the clear winner. But that’s not all, News 24 Chanakya did the best even in 2014 Elections as the data shows.

So as it turns out, not only has the reigning King of the Elections hasn’t changed since 2014, neither has the reigning king of Exit poll pollsters.

Based on this, we crown News 24 Chanakya The PollStar of all Pollsters. Well done guys.

Supreme Court dismisses plea filed by former Kolkata police commissioner Rajeev Kumar in Sharada Chit Fund scam

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a petition filed by the former Kolkata police commissioner Rajeev Kumar, appealing for protection from arrest by CBI till the jurisdictional court decides his anticipatory bail plea in the Sharada Chit Fund scam case.


Rejecting Kumar’s petition, the Supreme Court asked him to approach Calcutta High Court or other trial courts that are functional in West Bengal. “There are no vacations there. Seek appropriate remedy,” the apex court said.

Former Kolkata Police Commissioner Rajeev Kumar’s protection from arrest in the Sharada Chit Fund scam ends on May 24. Kumar has urged in the new petition to extend the period of protection. A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court, chaired by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, had withdrawn its February 5 order of not arresting Rajeev Kumar in its order on 17th May.

Last week, the Election Commission had relieved Rajeev Kumar from the post of Additional Director General, CID, in West Bengal for allegedly failing to control the incidents of violence in the state. The IPS officer asked to report at the MHA in Delhi. The action from the EC came a day after BJP president Amit Shah’s rally witnessed extensive violence due to an altercation between TMC and BJP supporters.

Rajeev Kumar is the same officer who was at the centre of a high voltage drama a few months back in Kolkata. He is accused of shielding some of the accused and destroying evidence in West Bengal’s Sharada Chit Fund scam case. On February 3, a team of CBI officials had arrived at his residence in Kolkata for interrogation. The ensuing spectacle that followed was nothing short of an unprecedented political and legal drama. Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee had jumped to his defence, moving the state machinery against the CBI and alleging that the attempt to interrogate Kumar is a ‘conspiracy’ by the central government against her.

CBI officials were also attacked, heckled and held up by the Kolkata police under Mamata’s orders. After that Mamata Banerjee had sat on a Dharna that lasted for almost 72 hours where she had insisted that PM Modi and Amit Shah are machinating to dethrone her and the interrogation order against Rajeev Kumar was a plot by NSA Ajit Doval. Rajeev Kumar was seen sitting along with the WB CM during the dharna.

Mamata ended the dharna after the Supreme Court ordered the interrogation of Rajeev Kumar at a location outside Bengal following which he was interrogated for days in Meghalaya’s Shillong along with some other accused in the case.