Home Blog Page 6829

Supreme Court extends NRC deadline, claims to be filed by 31 December

The Supreme Court has extended the December 15 deadline for filing claims and objections to the final draft of the National Citizenship Register to December 31. According to reports, the government of Assam had approached the apex court with a request to extend the existing deadline of December 15 by another month.

An SC bench of CJI Ranjan Gogoi and Justice R Fali Nariman reportedly said that it is keeping in mind the pace at which claims are being filed. Solicitor general Tushar Mehta had appeared for the state government to request an extension of the deadline.

Prateek Hajela, the NRC coordinator for Assam reportedly informed the SC that after the final draft was published on July 30, a total of 14.8 claims of objections and inclusion requests have been received. The SC bench was also informed that in the last few days, the pace of filing claims and objections has increased as the deadline approaches.

As per reports, the SC bench also eased the norms for documents to be considered for proving citizenship. The court added that the people filing for inclusion can attach any acceptable citizenship documents to substantiate their claim, provided they are considered by the NRC authorities.

While earlier, most documents allowed by the NRC authorities had a required cut off date of 24 March 1971, the All Assam Minorities Students Union represented by Kapil Sibal had appealed for easing of the norms. Hearing their plea, the bench directed the NRC authorities to accept List B documents valid too, regardless of the date of issuance, provided the NRC authorities are satisfied with the authenticity and validity of the said document.

The Assam government had also appealed for an increase in sample verification of NRC data to 20% from the current 10%. But the SC bench stated that they will consider the plea later.

The court also extended the date of start of verification of the filed claims from February 1 to February 15.

It is notable here that the NRC is being implemented in Assam as a method of protecting the rights of citizens against illegal immigrants. After the final draft of the Assam NRC was published, many states and citizen groups across the country have already initiated or called for similar exercises in their respective states, especially states that share an international border.

The final draft published in July had included 2.89 crores names out of the approximate 3.29 crore citizens of the state. About 40 lakh people were excluded. The government had assured that people will be given enough time to submit their claims of citizenship and include their names in the NRC. The NRC was mandated by the Supreme Court to handle the surge of illegal immigrants in the state which threatened to change the demographic balance in border states.

‘Will not develop areas which did not vote for me’: Rajasthan Congress MLA shortly after winning

Targeting the voters, the newly elected Congress MLA from Begu of Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, Rajender Singh Bidhuri has come up with a shocker after he said that he will not take up any developmental activities in those areas which did not vote for the Congress party, reported News18.

Speaking to the media after getting elected from Begu constituency, the Congress MLA stoked controversy by saying that he will only develop those areas which have voted for him and those areas which did not favour him will not get any benefits. He further went on to say those people did not vote for him can continue to fight for the next five years, but will not see any development rather he would support people who backed him during the elections.

Rajender Singh Bidhuri fought and won a close battle against BJP MLA Suresh Dhakad with a margin of 1661 votes. Reportedly, Bidhuri was facing severe opposition within the Congress party itself and a group of party leaders had even urged to high command to not field him as a candidate. Despite severe opposition, Bidhuri contested the election and has now been elected from Begu constituency.

The Congress party has secured 99 seats in Rajasthan state elections defeating Vasundhara Raje led BJP, who secured 73 seats. The Congress party failed to cross the half-way mark but has managed to attract other smaller parties and independents to form the next government. Senior Congress leader and former Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot and Rajasthan PCC Chief Sachin Pilot are in the race to be the next Chief Minister of the state.

Five years after Tarun Tejpal was accused of rape, Editors Guild finally suspends him along with M J Akbar

0

Editors Guild, the association of editors of media organisations in the country, has decided to suspend its members accused of sexual molestation. In a statement issued by the Guild, it announced that Tarun Tejpal and M J Akbar have been suspended from the organisation, while a decision on Gautam Adhikari will be taken after receiving the reply to a notice issued to him.


During the recent #MeToo movement, several women had levelled charges of sexual harassment against veteran journalist and former minister of state for External Affairs M J Akbar and founder editor of DNA Gautam Adhikari. M J Akbar is at present a dormant member and a former president of the organisation. On the other hand, one woman who had worked in Tarun Tejpal’s media venture Tehelka had accused him of sexual assault on her during an event in Goa in 2013. Subsequently police had registered a case against Tejpal and the case is now being heard by a trial court.

Although Tejpal was accused of sexual assault inside a lift by his colleague five years ago, he continued to be a member of the Editors Guild. Similarly, Akbar and Adhikari also continued as members after the allegations against them surfaced. The fact that people accused of sexual assault continued as Editors Guild members escaped attention for a long time. But last month this fact had come to light and people had started to put pressure on the Guild to take some action on the members. As a result of that, the Guild was finally forced to suspend the members.

156 NGOs barred from receiving foreign funds for 180 days by the Ministry of Home Affairs

0

The Modi government has barred 156 Non-Governmental Organisations (NGO) from receiving foreign funds for a period of 180 days for failing to open bank accounts in any of the 32 banks integrated with the Public Financial Management System (PMFS) according to the FCRA website.

The order, published in the FCRA website maintained by the Home Ministry. states, “It has been observed that the said associations have not yet opened their bank account(s) as mandated under section 17 of the FCRA, 2010 in PFMS-integrated banks and have contravened the provisions of the FCRA, 2010 by not complying with the directions of the Central Government.”

The order further states that show cause notices were served to the barred NGOs to which they failed to reply. It further mentions that their licenses could be cancelled as per section 14(1)(d) of the FCRA, 2010. The order states further, “It may be assured that FC receiving/utilization accounts of the respective Association are frozen immediately and no transaction may be allowed without Prior Permission of this Ministry.”

The list of associations provided in the order mentions the name of quite a few Christian and Islamic organizations although the majority, on the face of it, appear to be for ‘secular purposes’. A few Hindu NGOs have also been mentioned in the list. St. Mary’s Convent, Ansarul Islam Charitable Trust, Christ Church Hostel Unit -2, Sri Aurobindo Anusilan Society, Sister Nivedita Memorial Trust, Shree Gurdev Avadhut Ashram, Creative Social Educational & Economical Development Society, The Ideal Mothers Association, Millat Education Society, Pragati Foundation, Society For Litigation Awareness And Aid For The Public (slaap), Universal Caring Mission (UNICAM), Alliancae Francaise De Bombay, Islampur Jamia Anwarul Uloom Markaz, ST. ANTHONY S EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, Mother Theressa Weaker Section Development Welfare Society are some of the NGOs who have been barred from receiving foreign funds for 180 days.

Earlier in November, the Central Government had served a show cause notice to over 1700 NGOs for failing to file their annual returns between 2011-12 to 2017-17. NGOs registered under the FCRA have to file their annual returns within 9 months of the end of the fiscal year. Again, a very significant number of Christian organizations, some of them missionary, found their names on the list. Quite a few Islamic organizations were mentioned as well. In certain cases, where the names of the NGO suggested it was secular in nature, the chief functionary often belonged to minority communities.

St. Mathews Convent, World Evangelistic Outreach Of India Charitable Trust, St Paul Minor Seminary, The Indian Pentacostal Community Church of God, Christian Dalit Libration
Movement, St. Josephs Vocational & Industrial Society, PHOM BAPTIST CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION, Methodist Girls Hostel, St. Andrew’s Educational Foundation, Fertilizer Refinery Area Method Church, Carmelite Monastery, Ebenzer Home Of Social Outreaches, Apostolic Christian Evangelistic Assn., Himalayan Crusade were some of the Christian NGOs which were mentioned.

Some of the Islamic NGOs that featured in the list were Al-mu-assasthul Islamiya Trust, Hayya Alal Falah Society, Bashinul Hoda Islahul Muslemin Welfare Society, Islamic Educational & Welfare Trust, Jamia Fazia Haqqania Shershahi Society, Muslim Educational Trust, Noorul Uloom Educational Society, Allama Fazl-e-haq Khairabadi Educational Society, Madrasa Arabia Islamiya, Rehmat E Alam Hospital Trust Anantanag, Muassasatul Bahsi Qattalim Al-Islami.

Apart from these, there were many NGOs in the list that focused on Dalits and other marginalized sections of society such as the ‘Dalit Christian Society’. There were Hindu NGOs mentioned as well but they were extremely few compared to the minority NGOs.

AAP MP Sanjay Singh apologises to BJP youth wing leader Ankit Bhardwaj for making fake allegations

Aam Aadmi Party leader and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh has now apologised formally to BJP youth wing member Ankit Bhardwaj, for allegations made against him last year regarding the assault on AAP’s rebel MLA and former water minister of Delhi, Kapil Mishra.

Last year in the month of May, Kapil Mishra had levelled explosive allegations against CM Arvind Kejriwal and former cabinet colleague Satyendra Jain. He was ousted from the post of minister and then his party membership was suspended. Then on 10th May Kapil Mishra was assaulted by a man while he was at a hunger strike. The man was identified as an AAP volunteer named Ankit Bhardwaj in media reports, who had confessed to the police that he had been working for AAP since the last 2 years. But the AAP leadership soon started circulating that another person with the same name, Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM) executive member Ankit Bhardwaj had attacked Mishra. Sanjay Singh also had identified the BJYM’s Bhardwaj as the attacker, sharing his pictures and social media accounts on social media. Arvind Kejriwal had also shared social media posts where the BJYM leader was accused of attacking Kapil Mishra.


On 12th May, BJP’s Ankit Bhardwaj sent a notice to Kejriwal and Sanjay Singh asking them to apologise and state the truth on social media plus in a press conference within two days. But, they did not comply, following which Bhardwaj filed a legal civil defamation suit worth only Re 1, against Sanjay Singh.

In September this year, Delhi court framed defamation notice against Sanjay Singh under sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code.

Today, after facing legal pressure Sanjay Singh finally apologised to Ankit Bhardwaj without conditions at Patiala High Court.

“Last year I had given Sanjay Singh time to apologise for false allegations, before filing suit. But, he did not comply deliberately, so as to stretch legal proceedings. Now, after mounting legal pressure, he was compelled to apologise.” Ankit said to Aaj Tak, and added that AAP leaders are habitual of making frivolous allegations. He said that he has accepted the apology by Singh.

After the court was informed that the matter has been settled after an unconditional apology by the AAP MP, the court allowed the Ankit Bhardwaj to withdraw the defamation case.

This was not only defamation suit that is pending on Sanjay Singh. In October this year, Ahmedabad city court had issued a summon to AAP Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh over a defamation suit filed by Reliance infrastructure and other Reliance group companies led by Anil Ambani. This suit was filed in response to comments made by Singh in a press conference on February 13. He had raised suspicions about the deal to purchase 36 Rafale fighter jets from France. He said that the Rafale deal is ‘the deal of scams’, alleging that Modi government is paying an “astronomical price” for the jets.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in December 2015 had filed a defamation case against Arvind Kejriwal and 5 others for what he claimed were false allegations regarding his alleged role in certain irregularities in the DDCA (Delhi & District Cricket Association).

In April this year Sanajy Singh, CM Kejriwal, then AAP leader Ashutosh and AAP National Executive Member Raghav Chadha had issued apology letters to Arun Jaitley.

CM Kejriwal has also apologised to Shiromani Akali Dal’s General Secretary Bikram Majithia, for wrongfully defaming him. CM Kejriwal had alleged that Majithia is complicit in a “multi-million rupee drug racket” in Punjab when he was a revenue minister. Following which, Majithia had filed a defamation against CM Kejriwal Sanjay Singh and Ashish Khetan. This had sprouted an internal feud in AAP’s Punjab unit, which triggered MP Bhagwant Man’s resignation. Sukhpal Singh Khaira, AAP leader and the leader of the opposition in Punjab assembly had strongly condemned the apology and claimed that Kejriwal’s leadership has gone weak.

CM Kejriwal has similarly also apologised to Union Minister Nitin Gadkari and Congress leader Kapil Sibal against defamation suits filed by them.

Madhya Pradesh: Twitterati showers praises at Shivraj Singh Chouhan as he gracefully concedes defeat

BJP party veteran Shivraj Singh Chouhan, popularly known as ‘mama’ in the state of Madhya Pradesh, who led the party to three back to back victories in Madhya Pradesh, has gracefully conceded defeat to the Congress party and bowed out with immense gratification, taking full responsibility of the defeat.

After the assembly election results were out on Tuesday and the total seat tally did not favour the BJP in Madhya Pradesh, BJP decided not to stake claim to form the government in the state.

Madhya Pradesh had by far seen the most nail-biting finish, as no party reached the clear majority mark of 116 seats required to form the government in the 230-member house. While the incumbent BJP won 109 seats, the opposition Congress party won 114 seats, two short of the majority mark.

The BJP stalwart, outgoing chief minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on Wednesday took sole responsibility for BJP’s defeat in the Madhya Pradesh Assembly elections. “It’s true we didn’t get the majority (in the elections), and if anyone is responsible for the defeat, it is Shivraj Singh Chouhan,” saying this, the outgoing chief minister tendered his resignation to the Governor Anadiben Patel. Chauhan also congratulated Madhya Pradesh Congress president Kamal Nath for the victory.


“Kya haar mein, kya jeet mein, kinchit nahin bhaybhit main, kartavya path par jo bhi mila, yeh bhi sahi woh bhi sahi (Victory or defeat, nothing scares me. I will accept whatever comes my way in the path of duty),” Shivraj Singh Chouhan recited a few lines from a poem by Shiv Mangal Singh “Suman” before gracefully resigning from his post.

Twitterati defining the party veteran as a ‘BJP stalwart in Vajpayee mould’ and the ‘people’s chief minister’, poured out with extreme adoration for maintaining the dignity of the office and accepting defeat with as much grace.


People took to Twitter to applaud his dedication and hard work crediting him for transforming Madhya Pradesh in the last 15 years.


The 59-year-old BJP leader first became the chief minister of Madhya Pradesh in November 2005. During that time he was a Lok Sabha MP, but the party had decided to make him CM of Madhya Pradesh after the resignation of then CM Babulal Gaur. Serving Madhya Pradesh for over 12 years back to back, he broke the record of his predecessor and senior Congress leader Digvijaya Singh, who ruled the state for two consecutive years from 1993 to 2003.

Smashing Brahminical patriarchy to quashing FIR: Jack Dorsey says he held placard without understanding meaning

Twitter chief Jack Dorsey has moved the Rajasthan High Court for getting the FIR filed against him for holding a placard which read ‘smash Brahminical patriarchy’ quashed. Dorsey had stirred up controversy after he held up a placard which read the said message during his closed door meeting during his maiden trip to India. The Rajasthan High Court has stayed the arrest of Dorsey

The Jodhpur Court had earlier this month ordered filing of an FIR against him in a defamation case on basis of a petition filed by Vice President of Vipra Foundation’s youth wing, Rajkumar Sharma.

Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter, during his visit to India, became a part of a bizarre incident after he endorsed a far-left Hinduphobic slogan by holding a placard that said “Smash Brahminical Patriarchy”. This had caused a huge furor in the country after several people accused the Twitter CEO of promoting caste divide and attempting to incite people by showing its hatred towards one particular community.

After a massive outcry over the social media, Twitter had issued a statement regarding the shocking incident of Brahmin bashing and had to apologize to people profusely for hurting the sentiments. Twitter had also issued a statement regarding its CEO posing for a photo with a placard claiming that it was not a statement from their CEO but merely a reflection that they hear from all sides.

However, Sanghapali Aruna, claiming to be a Dalit activist and the founder of Project Mukti, who incidentally had presented the bizarre poster to Dorsey has rejected the clarifications issued by the Twitter and had asserted that the poster which had presented to Jack Dorsey was precisely about the Caste issue rather than rhetorical.

Minister Ramdas Athawale launches Muslim Gau Raksha Sangh, says it will bring communal harmony

Social Justice and Empowerment Minister Ramdas Athawale has termed the formation of Muslim Gau Raksha Sangh a revolutionary step that will bring Hindus and Muslims closer, as per reports.

While speaking at the launch of Muslim Gau Raksha Sangh today in New Delhi, Athawale said that cow protection needs to be adopted to bring about a change in the country. “If you want a change in the country, cow protection needs to be adopted. Awareness against cow slaughter needs to be created as it is banned by the law,” he said.

Irfan Sheikh, the founder of the Muslim Gau Raksha Sangh, credited Athawale for the idea of forming the group so that Muslims come forward for the protection of the cows. Athawale praised the Sangh and said that it was a significant step as the minority community had itself come forward to create awareness against cow slaughter.

Athawale condemned the incidents of violence in the name of cow protection and said that such incidents also happened when the BJP was not in power. “It’s not that incidents of lynching in the name of the cow are occurring in BJP rule. Such things happened in the past also when BJP was not in power. It cannot be accepted as there are other ways like seeking police help to stop cow slaughter,” he stressed.

Sheikh, who is also a journalist, told that they want to educate the children of Muslim community about cow protection. “Our main agenda is to educate children in the Muslim community for protection of the cow. We will hold workshops and lectures at schools for the purpose,” he said.

The Sangh will also confer “Gau Ratna Awards” to acknowledge the contribution of people in the field of cow protection.

Facebook campus evacuated over bomb threat, police find no explosive in search operations

0

A bomb threat at the Silicon Valley headquarters of Facebook Inc near San Francisco, on Tuesday, prompted police authorities to briefly evacuate the building taking prompt security measures. However, hours after a sweep of the structure began, there was no trace of any explosive.

The New York Police had received an anonymous tip about a bomb threat regarding Facebook’s campus in Menlo Park, California, and alerted local authorities at about 4:30 pm, said Nicole Acker, a spokeswoman for the Menlo Park police.

“The San Mateo County bomb unit was dispatched with explosive detection dogs that conducted a sweep of the building and found no suspicious packages or devices,” the authorities confirmed. “The building is all clear and secure.”

Nicole Acker further said that the evacuation was confined to a three-story facility on the campus which was not the headquarters building, though the company spokesperson said via email that “a few” buildings on the site have been evacuated.

However, both Facebook and police authorities have confirmed that everyone was safe.

Things have not been working too well for the social media giant in the recent past.

In a massive controversy which broke out in April this year, Facebook had stated that the personal data of nearly 87 million users may have been ‘improperly shared’ with political consultancy firm Cambridge Analytica. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg had accepted the blame for the data breach.

Failing to protect user data, Facebook had severely faced criticism worldwide. The Government of India has also sent a notice to Facebook to provide details on the data of Indian users leaked to CA.

Recently, the Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) had imposed a penalty of 10 million euros($11.4 million) on Facebook, for illegally harvesting the data of its users for commercial purposes. The Authority had also asked Facebook to run an apology on its website and app.

Meanwhile, another Silicon Valley company to face a security threat in the recent past was YouTube. A woman had opened fire at its headquarters in San Francisco, wounding three people before she shot herself dead.

UK Home Office acknowledges receipt of extradition order against Vijay Mallya

On 10 December, UK Westminster court ruled in favour of Indian authorities request for extradition of fugitive businessman Vijay Mallya. Now the UK home office has confirmed that they have received the court verdict.

British-Pakistani Home Secretary Sajid Javid will now contemplate on the order of the court and then decide whether further action on extradition should be taken or not. Secretary has two months to give orders, only after which the further process can take place. If Secretary finds the court’s order valid and gives a decision in favour of Indian authorities, then Mallya can appeal to High Court, to stall the process.

Further, if High Court also serves verdict against Vijay Mallya, he can appeal to Apex Court, but only if High Court or Supreme Court permits.

The Indian government had been trying hard to extradite Vijay Mallya after he ran away to the UK on March 2, 2016. Mallya faces charges of defaulting on loans to the tune of Rs 9000 crores. The extradition trial which began at the London court on December 4 last year, was aimed at proving the fraud case against Mallya and convincing the court that he will be subject to a fair trial in the country. After extensive written and oral submissions made by both Indian government and Mallya, the court decided that there is no merit in accusations made by Mallya against Indian government about the unfair trial, and ordered that the proceedings for his extradition to India may be initiated by the UK government.

Mallya’s lawyers had also claimed that Indian prisons won’t be able to take care of his health due to the inadequacy of sufficient medical facilities there. Judge Emma Arbuthnot rubbished the claims and asserted that Indian authorities have provided an ample amount of assurance that Mallya’s health will be well taken care of by medical care available at Barrack 12 of Mumbai’s Central Jail on Arthur Road.

On 31st July this year, the court had asked Indian authorities to submit a “step by step video” of the jail compartment where Mallya would be kept. Subsequently, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has filed a nearly 10 minute-long video highlighting various facilities, such as a television set, private toilet, a washing area, availability of proper natural light, access to library and a courtyard to take a walk, before the London court.

Lawyers defending Mallya’s extradition also raised allegations that CBI Special director Rakesh Asthana is a corrupt officer, and that his actions against Mallya were politically motivated. However, The judge said that there was no truth in those allegations and they were not backed by substance.

“I find that there is no evidence that Mr Asthana has acted corruptly. I noted the Supreme Court cleared Mr Asthana of the allegations made against his integrity.” Judge said.

“If after considering the case, the Home Secretary thinks extradition should go ahead he has to order the extradition within two months of the date the matter was referred to him,” said a spokesperson for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), which argued on behalf of the Indian authorities.