Home Blog Page 6882

Here is why I left the Left

TLDR: I didn’t say I joined the right. I just said I left the left. Because the left is just as crazy as the far-right. Same bigotry, just a different set of holy cows. Now the long version.

The seeds of doubt

The mid-2000s:

I first heard of Donald Trump through his reality show, The Apprentice. He was some kind of billionaire with interests in real estate, casinos and fake wrestling.

Late 2007

I moved from Mysore to Bangalore, thinking: “Man, I’m happy to get out of this stupid conservative hick town and to the big city, where people are educated, open-minded, logical, and do not cling on to irrational beliefs like sheep-brained fanatics.” Feel free to take a couple minutes to laugh at this statement.

2011

Donald Trump and Barrack Obama didn’t seem to be getting along. Obama roasted/humiliated Trump in front of the whole world at the White House Correspondents Dinner. What a cool guy! Delivering his verbal punches with the savagery of a seasoned standup comedian.

2012

Obama got re-elected. Take that, Trump!

2014

Narendra Modi was elected Prime Minister of the supposed world’s largest democracy. What was wrong with Indians, how could they do this? 

I fantasized about moving out of this terrible country and out to Scandinavia – supposed to be the most highly developed parts of the world, a socialist paradise where no one is hungry or homeless. A beautiful fairytale land, full of snowy landscapes, crystal clear waters and gorgeous Nordic blonde women.

But I was stuck in India! I did the only thing I could – vented my frustration on social media about how we were living under a Fascist government, run by an RSS-affiliated communal dictator. Being a minority, I was a dead man walking!

2015

One year and hundreds of anti-Modi jokes, posts, tweets and memes later… I was alive and well. Liberals loved me for my outspokenness. And bhakts hated me. Intolerance was on the rise!

But now, a new breed of intolerants was on the rise – millennial snowflakes, also know as SJWs – Social Justice Warriors. Spoilt-rich, privileged city-bred kids with single digit IQ, and fragile emotions. They were so stupid, it was hilarious! YouTube was flooded with “SJWs versus logic” videos. Anything and everything was offensive to SJWs, even something as simple and non-controversial as “fat is unhealthy.” SJWs said the Protein World “beach body” ad was sexist and body-shamed women… all this while missing the gigantic irony – they themselves were “body-shaming” Renee Somerfield, the model in the ad. 

2016

Brexit happened. And Donald Trump was in the news. A lot. Turns out he was racist, sexist, white-supremacist, misogynist, homophobic … I had no idea he was this kind of scumbag. And guess what… he was running for President! 

Meanwhile, SJWs by this point were not funny anymore. No longer just benign jokes, their behaviour was getting increasingly violent and sociopathic. Last year it was Renee Somerfield, this year, Priyanka Chopra was the target of their ire, for wearing a t-shirt which was “offensive to refugees.” This malaise was coming to India too. Soon, we had desi SJWs, and they threw hissy fits about anything and everything.

But one incident disturbed me more than any other. A veteran Model/actress was viciously attacked and smeared by desi SJWs. Her crime? Daring to criticize the mess that modern feminism has become. I read her comments, it was a reasonable argument, not aggressively worded or anything. And by reacting aggressively, SJWs were only proving her point. Like Renee Somerfield, she too was body-shamed.

When I expressed my displeasure on the matter, guess what – even I got a lot of hate! What shocked me most was, these were not some random faraway SJWs, these were people who I knew and interacted with every day, the same people who loved me for my anti-Modi rants, now calling me a sexist and misogynist and what-not.

People, who claim to fight for women’s rights – how could they support such toxic abuse of a woman holding a different opinion? You are either with them 100% or you are a total misogynist – no in-between. This was the beginning of my resentment.

November 9th 2016

“Watching these election results with the same horror as I did Indian elections 2014.” –  I tweeted. I was furiously refreshing the Google live results, watching hopelessly as Trump won state after state. And then it happened. I stopped refreshing. The colour drained from my face. It was done.

I was in a shocked, almost catatonic state that day. What was wrong with Americans? How could these inbred, hillbilly rednecks unleash this lunatic… this orange-haired orangutan on the world!? What was going to happen now? The future looked very dark. As if things were not grim enough, that other fascist head of state dropped another gigantic bombshell that day: demonetization

2016 ended and so did my delusion

By year end, I was unemployed, had very little money, but lots of time. I used the free time to educate myself, watched YouTube videos  – tech documentaries and SJW vs. Logic videos. I came across Western activists and YouTubers like Stephen Crowder, Paul Joseph Watson, Black Pigeon Speaks, Lauren Southern, Tomi Lahren, Joe Rogan, Mark Dice – I didn’t agree with all they said, but I loved how they ripped into SJWs, destroyed them with logic and reasoning. And these so-called right-wingers were actually quite open-minded, logical, and not religious zealots. In fact, most of them were atheists. 

No, I wasn’t brainwashed, I listened to all sides.

I educated myself about social/political topics. I learned that communism and socialism are not only unviable but outright deadly, catastrophic and genocidal. I learnt that my beloved Scandinavia was, in fact, hell on earth. I learned about cultural Marxism, permanent victimhood, identity politics, intersectionality, problems with open borders, a welfare state and big government.

Leftists believe in all these naïve, unviable, unrealistic and destructive ideas, and anyone disagreeing with them is called a racist or sexist or some -ist or -phobe. Basically, this is what “liberalism” means today. And they all had one more thing in common – they all supported Hillary Clinton. 

I could see why people had resentment towards AAP.

“Free water for everyone!” No. It wasn’t. It was coming out of the taxpayer’s pocket. Nothing is free.

Then one day, I found this video of Donald Trump’s television interview where he said something like, “We are spending millions of dollars to arm the rebels. Who are these people, do we know them? If we had not gone to war, if we had not interfered, if our politicians had just gone and sat on the beach by the sun, the Middle-East wouldn’t be the mess it is today.”

Interesting. That didn’t sound at all like the war-mongering madman he was said to be. 

I learned more and more as I came across intellectuals like Stefan Molyneux, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro. But they all seemed to support Donald Trump. How could they? Aren’t these supposed to be the good guys?

Meryl Streep made an emotional speech about how Trump made fun of a journalist’s disability. I listened to “other side” and their arguments. Apparently, Trump didn’t really make fun of a disabled journalist. Turns out it’s a hand gesture he’s been using for years. I did further research and I noticed a pattern:

“Trump calls Mexicans rapists!”

Truth: He said “they” – referring not to all Mexicans, but just violent illegal migrants. The video was deceptively edited.

“Trump banned abortions!”

Truth: He merely stopped government funding for a program that funded abortions in third-world countries. Why would American taxpayers want to fund that?

“Trumps talks about grabbing women by the p***y”

Truth: Well, okay, that one was real. He’s a bit crude in his language.

“Trump fired Comey out of spite!”

Truth: Comey was corrupt and a universally unpopular figure. Even Democrats thought so. 

“Trump banned Muslims!”

Truth: He merely issued a temporary travel suspension against seven countries whose security procedures were deemed flimsy. The Executive Order is available for download, not a word in there about “banning Muslims.” Interestingly, Obama did the same thing – and for a longer period of time – no one said anything then.

“Trump is a racist who bans migrants!”

Truth: People saying this were asking for open borders – anyone can enter any country, at any time. What nonsense? Shouldn’t there be some sort of screening/vetting procedure? Again, Obama and Bill Clinton did the same thing, no one said anything back then.

Something was seriously wrong here – a glitch in the Matrix.

Red Pilled

-If Trump is a Fascist/Nazi, then how come nothing happens to people who criticize him?

-If Trump restricts freedom of speech, how come Jimmy Kimmel can directly send him mocking tweets on Oscar night and is not packed off to a gulag?

-If Trump is an Islamophobe, how come comedian Hasan Minhaj roasted Trump and suffered ZERO consequences?

-If Trump’s America is such a terrible place, how come thousands of the third world illegal immigrants are dying to enter it?

I took the trouble of watching the first Presidential debate between Trump and Hillary, and by the end of it, I was convinced: this whole “Trump is evil” thing is an elaborate hoax, mass hysteria. And the media was totally complicit. I mean, I wasn’t born yesterday, I know all news is biased, but the deception of such a colossal scale? This level of open brazen lying?

I showed my findings to my liberal friends.

“Um… guys. I think we have all been misinformed.”

“What do you mean?”

“I think the whole Trump thing is a lie. Look at what I found here…”

And people listened to me.

“Wow! You are right. I can’t believe we were so blind. Thank you, Ahmed. for opening our eyes…

*record scratching sound effect*

No, wait… that’s not what happened. “Racist! Sexist! Homophobe! Islamophobe!” People lost it, I got a lot of hate – from the people who call themselves “rational” and “tolerant.” I mean… the evidence is right there, in front of their eyes, why do they refuse to acknowledge it? Why are they still clinging on to their original belief in the face of overwhelming evidence that says otherwise? Why are they so blind, why are they screaming hysterically, why are people behaving so irrationally?

“Trump derangement syndrome” was real and it was scary. Madness. It was madness. And why did bhakts hate me? I checked some of my old posts and tweets – I must admit, some of them were outright obnoxious and offensive, not to mention totally stupid and uninformed, sounding all preachy and sanctimonious with half-baked knowledge.

Soon, I had to ask – if “Evil Donald Trump” was just a boogeyman created by the media, could it be possible it’s the same thing with Narendra Modi? No, I’m not a Modi fanboy, but I can definitely see anti-Trump type biased reporting, fake news lies of omission and just plain lies. 

What I read: Modi flies all over the world on our tax money, gives unsolicited hugs to world leaders and industry captains, wears funny hats and plays musical instruments. LOL!

What I did NOT read: What serious talks went on after these formalities, the goodwill and partnerships he built with these countries, the business he’s brought back to the country.

What else has the media lied about? I had a lot of “unlearning” to do.

I started noticing surprising parallels between Western and Indian media:

-I have been trolling “Fascist” Modi for years, with my posts going viral and everything, and yet nothing happened to me (except a few mean comments on the internet).

-If Modi government restricts freedom of speech, how come speeches berating him are broadcast on national television?

-As a minority, I am getting “more than equal” treatment here, I have privileges like reservations.

-If India is so unsafe for Muslims, how come thousands of Bangladeshis are dying to enter here?

The parallels didn’t stop there. I noticed striking similarities between sentence structures used by Western SJWs and desi SJWs. They were just copy-pasting the same rhetoric, just replacing –

“white” with “Brahmin/Savarna”, 

“Christian” with “Hindu”

“race/ colour” with “caste” 

“Nazi/Fascist” with “Sanghi/right-winger”

Marxists and identitarians give people labels and make generalized assumptions based on their identity. They use the victim-card (even if they are very well-off) to arm-twist people (mostly guilt-ridden beta males) into giving them opportunities they are not qualified for, and would never win in a fair, transparent meritocratic system. They believe in “collective guilt.”

If a horrifying rape/sexual assault happens – “All men are rapists!”

Caste-based violence – “All Brahmins are evil!”

Islamist terror attack in Europe – “All Mus…”

No, wait, then they go “Let’s not spoil the name of an entire group just because of a few bad eggs. Peace and love for all. XOXO”

And why do I, Ahmed Shariff, have a problem with this? Because I know they’re faking it. These people have no moral base, the sheep-brained left goes by whatever is fashionable at the moment.

If tomorrow, hating Muslims becomes the “woke” thing to do, trust me, these semi-literate pseudo-intellectuals will be the first ones to turn around and stab me in the back! So all Brahmins are oppressors and all Muslims are victims – regardless of individual circumstances. But hey, these same people have also made me an “oppressor” when it suited them because you see, I’m “male.” They make me a hero or villain in their story, depending on whatever is convenient for them. You see, it was never about the “oppressed” to begin with, their veneer of virtue is just a ruse to advance their own careers.

Besides, these English-speaking hoity-toity snobs know nothing about Islam (or anything else for that matter.) They are too busy going on Europe vacations, partying in posh places with their fancy “woke” friends. Rich over-fed kids who haven’t seen a day of struggle in their lives, claim to speak on behalf of the common man, read a couple of clickbait articles and think they know everything. They don’t understand – most Indian Muslims are not very orthodox.

If true Arab-style Shariah were to come here, the perfumed elite would be second-class citizens paying jiziya and their “strong independent feminist women” covered from head to toe in burqas.

Yes, I know, the right is not too fond of Islam, but at least they are straightforward about it and we’ve found a way to work around it and co-exist in (a fragile) peace that we must all act responsibly to maintain. We disagree on a lot of things, but I found them to be surprisingly open-minded and polite and welcoming. Can’t say the same about leftists – some of the most stuck-up, close-minded intolerant people I’ve met.

I feel so uncomfortable around them, it is not a question of whether you will offend them, it’s just a question of when.

Because every day some new thing is declared offensive or sexist or racist or transphobe or this-ist or that-phobe. They keep making stuff up on a daily basis, it is IMPOSSIBLE to keep track of this.

Like, one day, you could just casually utter something and dozens of self-righteous lefties will descend on you, seething with fury, frothing at the mouth, calling you -ists and -phobes and you are left bewildered, thinking “What.. What did I say wrong? How… when did this become offensive? I didn’t get the memo!”

Their beliefs are not “bordering on insanity,” they have crossed the border, got an Aadhar card and settled down. They get weirder and weirder by the day. 

Sample this: “There are 76 different genders, not just male and female.”

I’m supposed to believe this garbage, otherwise, I’m ignorant and intolerant. You thought only “right-wingers” make ridiculous unscientific statements? 

People are being brainwashed en masse by propagandists, manipulated and turned into zombies incapable of independent thought. The story of The Matrix is truer than you think, we really are being controlled by machines. It is happening right here, right now, and it’s scary. Do not waste time arguing with these people, it’s pointless – their brains are immune to logic and reasoning. Give your answer where it matters – in the polling booth.

The far-left is just as intolerant as the far-right – a phenomenon called “horseshoe theory.”

In the end, I want to say – I’m not a right-winger, I’m not a Sanghi, I’m not one of your many -ists and -phobes. I’m just the kid who’s pointing out that the emperor is not wearing any clothes. 

Sabarimala: VHP warns Kerala government of Ayodhya-like movement to save Sabarimala and protect Hindu devotees

The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) on Tuesday pledged to initiate an Ayodhya-like movement across the country to protect the customs and traditions of the Ayyappa temple at Sabarimala. The VHP accused Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan of acting like Adil Shah after the Communist government in Kerala inflicted heavy atrocities on Hindu devotees present at Sabarimala.

According to the reports, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad warned the Kerala government if the unconstitutional and repressive action against Hindu devotees does not stop, it will be forced to start another mass movement similar to Ayodhya protests to protect the traditions of Sabarimala.

“We are waiting for the final court verdict and if no respectable solution is brought about a nation-wide protest and dharna will be organised by 5 crore devotees of Lord Ayappa,” said national joint general secretary of VHP Surendra Jain.

The VHP leader accused the Kerala CM of being a ruthless dictator. He went on to say that Pinarayi Vijayan has been trying to turn Kerala into a Hindu-free state like Kashmir. The VHP slammed that the state government instead of protecting women’s right it has resorted to atrocities against the Ayappa devotees. The VHP accused him of repeatedly torturing Hindus under the pretext of the implementing the Supreme Court decision. In the name of preserving the rights of women, he is abusing the women themselves very cruelly, said Surendra Jain.

The VHP further said that it has decided not to go to the Supreme court on this matter as there are already 13 cases pending in the court. According to the VHP, the Sabarimala matter is delayed so there is no point in filing another petition regarding this matter. The VHP said that it will rather support other groups who have filed a petition in the Supreme court to review its controversial judgement to allow women of all ages to enter the Sabarimala shrine.

Meanwhile, Kerala High Court has lashed out at the Communist Kerala government for its high-handedness and brutality in dealing with Hindu devotees present at the Sabarimala shrine. The Kerala High Court observations come hours after the Kerala police forcefully evicted several Hindu devotees from the Sabarimala temple.

The Kerala High Court while hearing a petition seeking to restrict entry of non-Hindus in Sabarimala temple, had also expressed its displeasure over the police excesses at the Sabarimala temple.

A Congress PM will make Ram Mandir at Ayodhya, claims a senior party leader in run up to polls

A senior Congress leader C. P. Joshi has claimed that only a Congress PM will build the Ram Mandir. Joshi, who will contest upcoming Rajasthan Assembly elections from Nathdwara constituency was speaking at a News18 event.

Accusing the BJP of ‘playing politics’ over the Ram Mandir at Ayodhya, Joshi said the BJP cannot construct the temple. “Rajiv Gandhi had opened the locks at Ayodhya, not Vajpayee,” Joshi said. He added that the civil suit for title clearance is pending in the Supreme Court. “The day the judgement comes, a grand temple must be constructed,” he added.

“Congress and Congress Prime Minister will construct a grand Ram Mandir,” Joshi exclaimed while debating with BJP’s Gajendra Singh Shekhawat. In 2007, Congress had told the Supreme Court that there is no historical proof of Ram.

India is gearing up for a long election season ahead as the general elections will follow the state assembly elections which conclude on 11th December. Upcoming elections are crucial for Congress which is struggling to gain back its lost foothold.

Infighting has also plagued Congress in many states. Poll-bound Rajasthan has witnessed a war between Ashok Gehlot and Sachin Pilot, while Jyotiraditya Scindia and Digvijaya Singh have drawn swords in Madhya Pradesh. Whereas in Chhattisgarh, Congress workers created a ruckus after the party released the final list of candidates for assembly elections. We had reported how with an eye on the upcoming Lok Sabha elections, Gujarat Congress had distributed a piece of power pie to 400 plus people making them ‘office bearers’.

Rajasthan goes to polls on 7th December and the results will be declared on 11th December along with four other states, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Mizoram and Telangana.

Dear BBC, unscientific research is fake news

The now infamous BBC report on “Fake News in India” has seen its share of ups and downs. I mean that quite literally; because the BBC keeps taking it down from their website and then putting it back up. With each new iteration come new amendments, regrets and clarifications.

And then the critics seize upon the new batch of sorry half-excuses, half-apologies and half-truths offered by the BBC. Clearly, they are having fun with it by now, led most prominently by Opindia’s Nupur Sharma. Then, the BBC goes back into its hole with its report, wondering how to patch it up.

The errors and outright lies in the BBC’s “report” are so damning and the excuses so juvenile that it seems they never even considered the possibility of public scrutiny when they put out their “research”. It appears they were relying on “argument from authority”. They assured themselves that the “natives” would not dare to question them and even if they did, their voices would not be heard. Initially, the BBC’s sepoys in India tried just that.

This is a problem. Because a rising India is prone to asking questions about everything. Which includes both the factual basis and the underlying intent of the BBC’s ‘civilizing mission’.

So if the BBC translates “Diwaliya kanoon” (Bankruptcy Law) as “Diwali law” and goes on to say that a well-established story about the success of Modi’s Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is “fake news”, they are going to get laughed at.

Let me show you how the BBC broke every single rule of ethical research.

The first rule of research is that sampling must be randomized. Even if you are not trying to do an opinion poll, you must take care to find a range of voices. But the BBC relied almost exclusively on sources like Altnews whose owners have repeatedly shown pathological hatred for the BJP.

When doing “research”, the most important thing is to try and break out of your comfort zone, go far outside the circle of people you know and obtain a diverse sample.

But instead of randomized sampling, the BBC relied on something that can only be called “privilege based sampling”: your voice is recorded only if you are my friend!

How did the English language media try to create a narrative of a wave of cow-related violence in the country after 2014? By unleashing a wave of reports of such incidents.

Then, the website Indiaspend did a headcount of these reports and used this to conclude that “97% of cow-related violence happened after 2014”, effectively recycling liberal outrage into data.

And now the BBC comes in and sources from websites like Indiaspend and Altnews to draw its conclusions!

So, the real primary source of the BBC “report” is not facts, but liberal outrage.

Then, there was the matter of BBC using a sample of just 40 people for their research on our country of 1.2 billion. Again Nupur Sharma worked hard to calculate what the recommended size should be based on mathematical laws governing statistics. In any case, it was immediately clear that a sample size of 40 is outright ridiculous.

But what happened next is the most shameful thing of all.

Untitled.png

Untitled.png

This is pure, unadulterated garbage.

Either the research follows scientific principles or it does not.

If it does not follow scientific principles, it’s not research. There are a lot of words that can be used to describe it: gossip, rumour, hearsay, lies etc, but it is not “research”.

No way.

Unscientific research is not a new or different kind of research. It is garbage.

Just like “fake news” is not a kind of news.

If it’s fake, it’s not news. And if it is news, it can’t be fake. The expression “fake news” is just a catchphrase, an oxymoron.

Exactly like that, whatever you choose to call it, “qualitative research” or “ethnographic research” or whatever … merely putting an adjective in front of the word “research” won’t turn something into research.

In fact, the use of extra adjectives like “qualitative research” or “ethnographic research” to sugarcoat the situation is even more suspicious. Those adjectives mean nothing.

Does your “research” conform to scientific principles? It’s a simple yes / no question.

If the answer is ‘no’, calling it research is like saying that fake news is a kind of news. It’s not.

There’s no middle ground here between scientific and unscientific, no grey area.

Even the claims of ethnography research and qualitative research were shot down. BBC used even those methods of research wrongly to arrive at generalised, fantastical claims like “Nationalism is the driving force behind fake news” when in fact, in qualitative research one absolutely cannot do that.

In fact, it amazes and disappoints me how the BBC can even offer such a sorry excuse and hope to be taken seriously.

How many people would be willing to board an aeroplane if they were told that the plane had been “tested”, just not scientifically?

I’d love to see a BBC staffer go flying in a plane at 30,000 feet that has only been “ethnographically tested”.

So let us apply the same simple logic even when we are not going to be flying 30,000 feet above the ground. If it’s not scientific, it’s garbage. End of story.

Twitter user serves legal notice to AltNews for breach of privacy, claims Rs 5 crore in damages

Twitter user The Skin Doctor has sent a legal notice to self-proclaimed ‘fact-checkers’ at Altnews.in accusing them of breach of privacy. When the admins of the website are not busy spreading fake news themselves or running an agenda, they spend their times targeting private individuals for fun.

On 18th November 2018, they published a strange article on a Twitter user who goes by the handle @TheSkinDoctor13. In their report, Altnews.in alleged that The Skin Doctor was running another handle called NEELLoneWolf and masquerading as a female Islamist troll.

They presented “evidence” like old tweets (with no time stamp) and extremely convoluted logic to reach this conclusion. They used this convoluted logic to say that the Prime Minister follows The Skin Doctor and he shouldn’t exonerate Islamists by saying Right-leaning accounts run Islamist handles and basically discredit the man.

In the notice, The Skin Doctor has asked for an unconditional public apology and asked the admins to take down the post within 48 hours of receipt of the notice. Failing which, appropriate civil as well as criminal action could be initiated against AltNews. The notice further says that a sum of Rs. 5 crore be paid to The Skin Doctor for “the use of such malicious and derogatory information on a public forum, visible to millions of users and reported in various social media platforms.”

The Skin Doctor is a private individual and holds no public office, so his identity really shouldn’t be anyone’s business. Doxxing – to search and publish private or identifying information on the individual over the internet, usually with a malicious intent, could be dangerous for that person. Hence, AltNews publishing personal information while being crusaders of privacy themselves is quite ironical. Just to be clear, The Skin Doctor is a private individual, who does not hold any public office, is not an elected public representative.

The Skin Doctor had earlier released a statement denying the allegations by AltNews. He also pointed out that while he is refuting the allegations, running multiple accounts is not illegal (unlike what AltNews did).


He had said that he has filed a police complaint about publishing private message (section 66E), breach of privacy (section 72) and misrepresentation (section 71) which are all punishable offences. The Skin Doctor has now consulted his lawyers and has decided to take the legal course to bring the matter to its logical end.

This is not the first time AltNews admin Pratik Sinha has gone personal with an individual. Earlier he had displayed his stalker tendencies (the ones which could morph into even dangerous crimes if not controlled) against Rahul Roushan by targeting his wife and his newborn 2-month-old daughter.

Dear Jack Dorsey, you insulted Hindus while on our soil and it is time you introspect

Dear Jack,

During your visit to India, you became an embodiment of what-not-to-do-when-on-a-trip-to-India. The comedy of errors began with your posture while meeting the head of the country, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and in the mother of all ironies, meeting Rahul Gandhi, of all people, to discuss fake news. Now, you have got yourself into another controversy. Meeting a Leftist gang of journalists who focus on spreading anti-Hindu canards.

India is a country where instinctively, the majority of the country firmly believes in Nationalism. Most of us are patriots who believe in giving each other respect and above all, believe in living up to what this country, that we consider our first mother, expects of us. After these shenanigans, several people who thus far enjoyed the great platform you built from the ground up, are questioning you and Twitter. Are you against us? We wonder. Do you wish to insult us? We ask. You have made it difficult for digital India to trust you. That’s just bad business.

You have not only acted against the very foundation of this country, that is built on values derived from tolerant Hinduism, but also acted against the ethos of your own company. At least the ethos you claim to have. That of mutual respect. Acceptance. Tolerance. Freedom. Liberty and avoiding abuse at all cost.

You carried a placard that read “Smash Brahaminical Patriarchy”.

For a CEO of a multi-billion dollar international company, one would expect you to understand that basic dynamics of the country and understand what is right or wrong. If you didn’t know, perhaps I should inform you that these are slangs. Casteist slurs used to defame and denigrate Hindus for a long time. You endorsed this, Jack.

When you held that placard, you should have asked these “activists” what Brahminical means. Brahmins are a varna who believe in scholarly pursuits. Brahminical is a term coined by people who wish to use that construct to insult Hindus, because lashing out at Hinduism on the whole, in so many words, would be counterproductive for their agenda.

Brahmins are a section of Hindus. An important section. Just as important as any other Hindu. To target a specific class of people without a basic understanding of the culture or the hatred harboured by the very “journalists and activists” you wined and dined with was a brutal insult to Hindus.

Perhaps the “activists” you spoke to told you that Brahmins are akin to the Fathers of the Church or Mullahs of the mosque who choose to impose a codified conduct on women. It is not so. Nothing can be further from the truth. As I explained, Brahmins are a varna that historically believed in scholarly pursuits.

They must have told you that Brahmins are priests and just that, I would assume. How else would they explain to an American the complex dynamics of a diverse country like India, all the while peddling their own agenda? It is not true. Brahmins today are involved in a number of professions like farming, business, and yes, also being priests. This has nothing to do with patriarchy or any of the gibberish you must have been told.

You have already admitted that you and your employees at Twitter have a strong left bias. However, do you think its alright for a corporation to oppose Hindus, that too, while in India by aligning himself to a bunch of hatemongers and politically motivated groups?

The violence that that poster signified and the caste hatred that it conveyed was endorsed by you. Hateful posters were also seen when the genocide of Hindus happened in Kashmir. Would you take responsibility if the result of Twitter CEO endorsing caste hatred leads to hate in our country?

You are openly playing into the hands of declared Communists in India who are sympathizing with all sorts of terrorist and extremist groups. Is it your official stand that you support the ideology that caused the genocide of farmers and poor citizens in communist societies of ex-USSR and China?

One wonders: What did you want to achieve by this?

It is entirely possible that you were not aware and a bunch of vicious people simply used you to make a political point. And I would be inhuman if I didn’t sympathise with your predicament if that be true.

I can only hope that you would be careful in the future. It is not ok to deride Hindus in India (or anywhere, for that matter) just like it’s not ok to harbour anti-Semitic sentiments and deride the Jews. It is really the same thing.

I can only hope that the next time around, you would learn about our culture before either endorsing hatred or being taken for a ride by the ones who do.

Forgiving is in our Dharma. So whether you apologise or not, we forgive you. With a hope that you will see reason.

Best wishes and we look forward to seeing you again.

Sushma Swaraj announces she will not contest the upcoming Lok Sabha polls

External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj, on Tuesday, announced that she will not contest the upcoming Lok Sabha elections. She cited health reasons for her decision. Swaraj had undergone kidney transplant in 2016 and had recovered well.

A lawyer by profession, Sushma Swaraj started practice as a Supreme Court lawyer in 1973 at 21. She rose to prominence among political ranks when she organised protests against Indira Gandhi’s government. She was also part of George Fernandes’ legal defence team in 1975 during Indira Gandhi imposed Emergency.

Swaraj was elected to the Haryana Legislative Assembly from 1977-82 and then from 1987-90. She was the Cabinet Minister of Labour and Employment as a Janata Party MLA(1977-1979).

She joined the BJP in 1980. In 1980,1984 amd 1989, she unsucessfully contested elections from Karnal, Haryana. From 1987 to 1990, she served as the Minister of Education, Food and Civil supplies under Devi Lal’s Lok Dal-BJP government.

She was elected as a member of the Rajya Sabha in 1990. In 1996, she was elected to the 11th Lok Sabha from South Delhi. She served as Information Broadcasting Minister during the 13-day government led by Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

In 1998, she was re-elected to 12th Lok Sabha. She retained the Information and Broadcasting ministry and had an additional charge of the Ministry of Telecommunications from March 19 to October 12, 1998, under Vajpayee’s second term.

Swaraj was also the first woman chief minister of Delhi in October 1998.

Following general elections 2014, Sushma Swaraj was assigned the Ministry of External Affairs in Narendra Modi’s cabinet. Swaraj won hearts when she used Twitter as a platform to help Indians in distress abroad.

Controversial poster Jack held was not ‘rhetorical’ but entirely about caste, confirms the person who gifted the poster

The massive controversy over the ‘brain-fade’ moment of Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey where he had posed for a photo with a placard that declared “Smash Brahminical Patriarchy” has now taken a new turn. The person who had presented the placard claims that the provocative poster held by Jack Dorsey was entirely about ‘Caste issues’ as opposed to the clarification issued by the Twitter claiming to “understand all sides of important public conversations”.

After a massive outcry over the social media, Twitter had issued a statement regarding the shocking incident of “Brahmin bashing” and had claimed that it was not a statement from their CEO but merely a reflection that they hear from all sides. Vijaya Gadde, Twitter India’s Legal, Policy and Trust & Safety Lead, had apologized to people profusely for hurting the statements.

However, Sanghapali Aruna, claiming to be a Dalit activist and the founder of Project Mukti, who incidentally had presented the bizarre poster to Dorsey has rejected the clarifications issued by the Twitter and has now asserted that the poster which had presented to Jack Dorsey was precisely about the ‘Caste’ issue rather than any “rhetorical”.

Aruna, who claims that there exists a ‘Brahminical patriarchy’, which controls all of us in the country and the ‘Smash Brahminical patriarchy’ poster which she gifted was entirely related to questioning the hegemony and concentration of power in the hands of one community.

Image Courtesy: The Print /Mrs Palakaddan (@Lotus2021)

She went on to defend the bizarre incident by claiming that the posters were not at all an attempt to incite and show hatred against one community, but rather was an attempt to challenge the “dominance” and the “sense of superiority” of the Brahmins. She also went on to say that the apology rendered by the legal head of Twitter India, Vijaya Gadde was very disturbing.

Sanghapali Aruna went on to claim that it was a form of hate and trolling by ‘Right-wing Hindutva’ brigade referring to the people who questioned Jack Dorsey for his involvement in this shocking incident.

She confirms the fact that the whole poster saga with Jack Dorsey was an attempt to showcase the ‘so-called’ Brahmin dominance and what she refers to a ‘caste apartheid’ opposed to what Twitter claims to be a “reflection of our company’s efforts to see, hear, and understand all sides”.

Watch: AAP MLA Somnath Bharti stoops to a new low, asks a woman journalist to become a prostitute

Aam Aadmi Party MLA Somnath Bharti today stooped to a new low. While interacting with a female journalist Ranjana from Sudarshan News, Bharti lost his cool. He asked her to ‘stop doing bh*dwagiri’ followed by directing her to become a prostitute.


Somnath Bharti was speaking on the recent incident where a man allegedly threw red chilli powder on Delhi chief Arvind Kejriwal. He gets personal with the journalist, following which he threatened that the channel will close down after 2019, “yeh bh*dwagiri chalegi nahin, 2019 ka intezar kar lo.”

When the journalist reminded him to maintain dignity while speaking, he accused the journalist of misbehaving on camera. When the journalist asked him to apologise, he accused her of acting like a middleman for the BJP. He then asked her to stop doing the ‘bh*dwagiri’ and ‘dh*ndhe pe baith jao‘, which in crude Hindi is akin to asking her to become a prostitute.

Somanth Bharti is not the only AAP leader to accuse the media of being a ‘middleman’. AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal has regularly used the term ‘dalali’ to refer to those journalists who question him.


During the Punjab elections in 2017, Kejriwal was accused of neglecting Delhi as he tried to form government in other states. Irked by the criticism, Kejriwal had then hit out on Shekhar Gupta and referred to him as a ‘dalal’ too.

AAP leader Somnath Bharti has been quite controversial. In 2014, Bharti had carried out a midnight raid in Khirki Extension where Bharti and his aides had allegedly assaulted a Ugandan woman.

Bharti’s wife Lipika had accused him of domestic violence as well as attempted murder and causing miscarriage without consent of woman.

Not only BBC ‘fake news in India’ research, but Nigeria and Kenya research also pulled down

It was a few days ago when BBC published a 100+ page research paper on ‘fake news’ in India. Their research was comprehensively debunked on multiple counts including shoddy methodology, questionable and politically motivated sources and sample size. We also wrote about how the BBC research drew terribly fallacious conclusions based on a skewed data set and hypothesis. Following the brouhaha, BBC had pulled down its research paper. The PDF now shows a 404 error.

BBC functionaries had asserted that the research paper would be uploaded again with a note on the questions that had been raised regarding its methodology. The paper was pulled down 30 hours ago and has not been uploaded yet.

While waiting for the fake news research paper on India to be uploaded again, we realised that BBC’s research on ‘fake news’ in Kenya and Nigeria had also been pulled down.

In their article titled ‘Nationalism a driving force behind fake news in India, research shows’, BBC included two reference links where one could click to read the full research report. One was for the India report, and the other, for the research report on Kenya and Nigeria.

When one clicks on that link that should ideally take on to the full research paper, it shows a 404 error.

When we reached out to Mr Trushar Barot, a functionary of BBC involved with this research paper, he said that both the research papers should be back up soon.