Home Blog Page 6881

India suggests voting to overcome hurdles in UN Security Council reforms

India has long been advocating for expanding the number of permanent seats in UN Security Council. According to reports, India’s Permanent Representative Syed Akbaruddin, while speaking in the meeting of General Assembly on behalf of the G-4 comprising of India, Brazil, Japan and Germany, told the Assembly, “Naysayers cannot be allowed to cast a dark shadow over the entire membership and hold the overwhelming majority back.”

“Some amongst us cannot hold the entire process hostage by bending the rules of negotiations,” he said.

The reform process has been reportedly hindered during almost ten rounds of negotiations mainly due to ‘United for Consensus’, a 12-member group that opposes adding permanent members, has used the technicality of preventing the adoption of a negotiating text to be the basis of the discussions and go forward. The group consists of Pakistan.

Akbaruddin has reportedly suggested Inter-Governmental Negotiations (IGN) to operate under normal rules of procedure like all other General Assembly processes, in order to overcome the hurdle. “The General Assembly works on the basis of “give and take negotiations, focused on a document with the co-chairs or facilitators, acting as agents, for facilitating dialogue. In the General Assembly, all a naysayer can do is, at best, cast a negative vote,” he said.

Majority of the countries spoke in favour of the Security Council reform during the meeting with Portugal explicitly coming out in support of India’s permanent membership in the Council.

During the last Assembly session, the IGN met only between January and June and voted in July. “Taking the cue from success stories of the last session, we suggest that our discussions on Security Council reforms should begin at the earliest, and there should not be any artificial deadlines to end discussions prematurely in June,” Akbaruddin added. African, Arab,  and Carribean nations have also demanded permanent representations in the security council. Guyana’s permanent representative stated that though half the world’s population lives in Africa, Latin America, and the Carribean, the countries have no representation and the historical injustice must be corrected.

While the meeting heard some supporting voices, there were also countries who opposed the reform. Pakistan was amongst those who opposed. “If the Council cannot reconcile the interests of its five permanent members, how will it cope with the interests of a bigger membership?” China’s Permanent Representative Ma Zhaoxu opposed setting timelines for reforms or “arbitrarily launching text-based negotiations”, Permanent Representative of Pakistan Maleeha Lodhi said.

Jammu and Kashmir: PDP, NC and Congress aim to form an opportunistic alliance to keep BJP out

With an intention to not let Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) regain power in Jammu and Kashmir, rival parties are said to be in talks to join hands to form the government. According to sources, Mehbooba Mufti’s PDP, the Congress and the National Conference are in talks with each other to form a coalition government in the region.

Jammu and Kashmir has been under Governor’s rule since BJP pulled out of the ruling coalition with PDP on June 16. Governor’s rule cannot be extended after it completes its six-month period on December 19. According to the Governor, Satyapal Mallik, though there are proposals to impose President’s rule thereafter the 87-member Assembly is not being dissolved.

There have been speculations amongst various political circles that confidentially, efforts were in progress to prop up a government headed by Sajjad Lone’s People Conference. Though People Conference has only two MLAs, it would be banking on support by the 25 MLAs of BJP. However, this combination would fall short of the required majority of 44 which is sought to be made by splitting the PDP which has been rocked by dissidence.

The sources reveal that the mainstream parties, primarily the PDP, Congress and National Conference, who are apprehensive about a BJP backed government in the valley, have planned to get together to form a government.

According to the plan which is being conceptualised, the PDP and Congress would form a coalition government backed from outside by the National Conference. The National Conference has made it clear though, that they are not interested in joining a coalition government, but would provide support from the outside, said sources. The PDP has 28 MLAs, followed by NC with 15 and Congress with 12 which will, presumably, make up for a clear majority.

If such an arrangement comes about, Mehbooba Mufti is unlikely to be the chief minister but the government may be headed by a senior PDP leader.

The J&K’s political scenario, this year, has seen many highs and lows with the BJP on 19th June deciding to pull out of the alliance with PDP in Jammu and Kashmir saying it is “untenable” for the coalition to continue. The National General Secretary of the BJP, Ram Madhav while speaking to the media had reiterated that “Keeping in mind larger interest of India’s security and integrity, the fact is that J&K is an integral part of India, in order to bring control over the situation prevailing in the state we have decided that the reigns of power in the state be handed over to the Governor.”

In the 87-member legislative assembly in Jammu and Kashmir, the magic number to form the government with simple majority stands at 44. The PDP in its desperation to get back the reigns has reportedly decided to get together with NC, which is known to be a bitter rival of the PDP.

PDP too seems to be going the Congress way. These sort of opportunistic alliances has become the latest strategy of the Congress party to match wits with the BJP. Getting together of parties with no common ideologies, just to gain power, has been the latest game plan the Congress has adopted, which in few instances has already boomeranged at them.

Lately, the ‘opportunistic alliance’ between Congress and JD(S) in Karnataka is a perfect example of this impetuousness. Craving to form the government in Karnataka, which was evidently nothing but a compromise, the Congress and the JD(S) now, seems to be constantly grappling to accommodate each other.

Earlier, Kumaraswamy had broken down saying he is swallowing the poison and had accused certain Congress leaders of ‘tormenting’ him. In August, the rift within the JDS-Congress alliance had reportedly widened as former Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah had expressed his wishes to become the chief minister again.

Congress has been trying hard to devise such ‘opportunistic alliances’ to portray a strong anti-BJP stand for the upcoming 2019 elections. However, internal turmoils and drifts which have been exposed so far depict that the ballgame the Congress is brewing might just slip out of its own hands, and leave the party oscillating.

Satisfied with ongoing Police probe In Amritsar attack case: Nirankari Mission

0

The Nirankari Mission has expressed satisfaction over the ongoing probe in the Amritsar attack. The regional in-charge of the Mission, Joginder Kaur, visited the Guru Nanak Dev Hospital along with CM Amarinder Singh to see the injured. She avoided any reference to past conflicts and refused to comment on State government’s claim of involvement of separatist powers. Punjab Chief Minister Captain Amarinder Singh has hinted at the involvement of ISI-backed Khalistani or Kashmiri militant groups in the attack.

“1978 conflict is an old thing now. We have no enmity with anyone,” Kaur said responding to a query. Kaur expressed ignorance as to the reason behind the attack. “We are not able to understand the reason behind the attack because we don’t have bad relations with any individual or group. We do not comment against followers of any religion. We have no enmity with anyone. If anybody has problem with us or our style of preaching, we don’t know why would that be. We are satisfied with ongoing probe,” she said.

She told that CCTV cameras will be installed at all the Nirankari Bhavans in Punjab. “I can’t confirm how many Narankari Bhavans are there in Punjab. There is Bhavan at every 8-9 km. We have already installed CCTV cameras in many of such Bhavans and soon cameras will be installed at all Bhavans.”

She denied having any security arrangements at their congregation centres. “We have no deployment of the police at our Bhavans. We had no idea that anything like this can happen. We never asked for security. Police have said that they will provide security and there are no issues in this. Maybe we have been treated as an easy target,” Kaur revealed.

Three people were killed and around 20 injured in a grenade attack at a prayer hall in Adliwal village near Amritsar’s Rajasansi area on 18th November. The Punjab Police suspected the attack on the Nirankari Bhavan to be a terrorist attack. However, after the preliminary investigation pointed towards the possibility of the involvement of local youth, the local police raided the houses of local Sikh activists in the wee hours of Tuesday.

The grenade attack at the sect’s Dera in Amritsar is being seen as an attempt by the Sikh radicals to disturb communal harmony in Punjab. According to Punjab Director General of Police Suresh Arora, “Prima facie it appears to be terrorist act. Target is not individual, but a congregation and group of people sitting there. We are investigating the case and can reveal more only after the investigation.”

As per the information, a Dal Khalsa member Gurjant Singh has been taken in custody. Dal Khalsa spokesperson Kanwar Pal Singh Bittu expressed grief over the loss of lives and said the police and investigative agencies should probe the attack thoroughly without any prejudice and not see it only from the prism of the Sikh-Nirankari clash of 1978.

The Nirankari-Sikh relationship was by and large peaceful until the day of Baisakhi of 1978 when a brutal clash between the Sikhs led by Fauja Singh and the Nirankari convention in Amritsar left several dead and a majority of them were Sikhs. However, this was not a sudden clash and the conflict had been building up for a long time. The Nirankari is a heretic movement within Sikhism with the main difference being that of belief. The Nirankari believed in a physical guru opposed to the Sikhs’ belief in scriptural guru (Guru Granth Saheb).

Punjab is also currently on a high alert following an input by Counter Intelligence Wing of the state police about the presence of nearly seven Jaish-e-Mohammad terrorists in the state.

Zealot Christian missionary goes to restricted Andaman Island to convert protected tribals, gets killed by Sentinelese tribe

0

John Allen Chau, a Christian missionary who had reportedly expressed ‘strong desire’ to meet the hostile Sentinelese people and ‘preach Christianity’ to them, was killed by them. According to reports, Chau was interested in converting the Sentinelese people.

Seven fishermen who took Chau to the island have been arrested under the Prohibition of Aboriginal Tribes Act and various sections of the IPC. The fishermen said that they last saw Chau being attacked with bows and arrows after he landed on the island on 16th November. They further said that as they sailed away from the island, they saw Chau’s body half-buried in the sand.

The Sentinelese people, whose population was estimated to be 40 in 2011 census, are known to be hostile and resist contact with the outside world. Chau had tried to reach the island on 14th November but could not make it. After he was attacked by bows and arrows, he continued walking when the tribals tied a rope around his neck and dragged him.

The Indian law protects the Sentinelese people and they cannot be prosecuted. Any contact with them or entry into areas inhabited by them is illegal. In 2017, the government had clarified that the Sentinelese are identified as an “aboriginal tribe”. Recording their videos as well as uploading their videos on social media or the internet is prohibited.

Mizoram Elections: Mizo Church takes anti-BJP stand as Amit Shah promises secularism and peace in the state

Election fever is rising high in the poll-bound State of Mizoram with top leaders joining the campaign. BJP President Amit Shah addressed rallies in Lawngtlai and Vairengte in Mizoram. He promised to make Mizoram secular and peaceful where all sections of society will develop.

Shah promised to give more power to Autonomous District Council (ADC) in the Sixth Schedule of the constitution. “When people of Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Assam, Tripura, Arunachal Pradesh can bring progressive BJP Government why can’t Mizoram also be part of the BJP family. BJP government has put an end to the era of bandh and blockade and controlled armed groups in different states,” said Shah.

Shah said that Tourism potential of Mizoram could not be utilised due to lack of road connectivity. He attacked Congress for playing with the emotions of people of Mizoram and for bringing the ‘Vote for money’ culture in the State.

Meanwhile, the Mizoram Church has taken an anti-BJP stand urging the congregation to abstain from voting for the BJP. The Church has issued a guidelines booklet asking the voters to keep the interests of the community in mind while casting their vote. Earlier, the Nagaland Church had also taken a similar stand before Nagaland elections about nine months ago. The Mizoram Church has questioned BJP’s decision of observing Christmas Day as the Good Governance Day. The Church feels that if BJP is voted to power the religious freedom will be under threat and the interests of Christians will be ignored. The comments from the Church came despite Amit Shah’s assurance of making the State secular and peaceful. The Church’s attempt to influence the voters by creating a fear psychosis appears to expose its communal agenda.

The church plays an important and influential role in Mizoram politics. Earlier, Mission for Christ had expelled one of its full-time missionary for joining BJP to contest the assembly elections.

Congress President Rahul Gandhi also attacked BJP while addressing an election rally in Champhai. Gandhi said that the BJP has an understanding with the Mizo National Front. He accused the BJP of trying to enter Mizoram with the help of regional party Mizo National Front (MNF). “In Mizoram, MNF has opened the door for RSS to enter the state. It is sad that the MNF is helping these people who are attempting to destroy the culture, language and religion of Mizoram,” claimed Gandhi. He said that the Congress will protect the history, idea and culture of Mizoram.

“BJP and RSS want to impose only one ideology. They know that they cannot come to power in Mizoram or India next time, so they are putting RSS people in the institutions like RBI, CBI and Election commission. The idea is even if they lose election they will have people in these institutions,” said the Congress President.

Mizoram goes to poll on Nov 28 for its 40 Assembly seats.

CBI vs CBI : Govt suspects phones of Ajit Doval and others were cloned and tapped to frame them

On November 20, The Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi was visibly irked at the media coverage of petition filed by senior CBI officer Manish Sinha at the Supreme Court and the coverage of Alok Verma’s responses to the Central Vigilance Committee.

On 19th, DIG Sinha had filed a petition against his abrupt transfer to Nagpur on October 24, the same day the union government had sent the CBI director and special director on leave pending enquiry against charges against them. Sinha had sought an urgent hearing on 20th, which the court had refused. Sinha had told the court that he has some shocking revelations regarding the agency, but Chief Justice had replied “nothing shocks us”, declining urgent hearing of the petition.

Immediately after that, the petition found its way into media, which got wide coverage from various media houses. The petition indeed made many shocking allegations, even dragging the name of National Security Advisor Ajit Doval into the murky CBI vs CBI drama, alleging he had interfered in CBI investigations. The Supreme Court was not at all happy with this publication of the petition and commented that the appellant does not deserve a hearing for this.

Now, the same petition has raised alarms bells at the security establishment of the government. Other than Doval, the Sinha’s petition had also made allegations against law secretary Suresh Chandra. Sinha claimed that Chandra was in London on November 8, and on that day Sathish Sana Babu, who has claimed to have paid a bribe to Rakesh Asthana, talked to Chandra on the London number of the law secretary. The petition says that Sana spoke to Chandra on Whatsapp on the evening of 8th November.

It claims that Chandra was in London for some work related to the Nirav Modi case, and he was trying to contact Sana for 4-5 days convey the message of Cabinet Secretary Shri PK Sinha that the Union Government will offer full protection to him.

But on a serious twist to the case, Law Secretary Suresh Chandra has claimed that he was not even in London on November 8. He told Times of India that he has visited London only once this year and that was in July. This revelation has raised the possibility of sensitive numbers being put under illegal surveillance, and also the possibility of obtaining SIM cards in the name of prominent persons or even cloning their numbers to frame them.

Sinha had claimed that Ajit Doval had instructed CBI Director Alok Verma to stop an ongoing search on CBI officer Devender Kumar. The claims by Sinha implies that phone numbers of Ajit Doval and other high officers were put under surveillance. And as Chandra was not in London in November, a question arises whether someone else was using his number London.

The question also arises whether phone numbers of high ranking officials were cloned and then illegally being tapped to frame them. According to an official, “this reads like the perfect script of a frame-up. You can arrest anybody on the basis of an alleged call and he will not be able to prove his innocence until the trial starts and the fraud is exposed by forensic examination.”

Tapping someone’s phone requires the approval of the home secretary. But the ‘shocking’ revelations by Sinha hints that such rules were openly flouted in the agency.

Days after Donald Trump slams Pakistan for not acting on Islamic terror, US suspends $1.66 billion security aid

The United States of America has decided to suspend $1.66 billion in security assistance aid to Pakistan after President Donald Trump directed early this year, the Pentagon said. Reportedly, the growing frustration of the American government against Pakistan’s inability to fight Islamic terrorism has resulted in the cutting off aid to Pakistan.

According to the reports, the decision comes days after Trump statements slamming Pakistan of not doing ‘a damn thing’ for the US, alleging that its government had helped Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden hide near its garrison city of Abbottabad.

$1.66 billion of security assistance to Pakistan is suspended,” Col Rob Manning, spokesman of the Department of Defense told the reporters on Tuesday.

Earlier, The US President Donald Trump had launched a scathing attack on Pakistan for deliberately not acting against the Islamic terrorist forces operating on its soil by citing the presence of 9/11 mastermind al-Qaeda chief Osama Bin Laden who was hiding in Abbottabad, allegedly under the protection of its military.

Some experts believe that President Trump is frustrated over Pakistan after the leaders of Pakistan failed in keeping their promise of serious cooperation between two countries to fight terrorism. Recently, Trump had shared a tweet saying that the former President Clinton had failed to act on the issue of Bin Laden.


The United States has been pushing Pakistan for a long time now, to crack down on safe havens for terrorists operating inside the country. It had also announced a freeze on the aid at the beginning of the year, which is reported to be worth almost $2 billion.

In September, the Trump administration had also cancelled USD 300 million in military aid to Islamabad for not doing enough against terror groups like the Haqqani Network and the Taliban active on its soil.

The United States believes that Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency and other terrorist groups have actively promoted terrorism across the region. The White House believes that ISI has been providing support through the supply of arms and funds to terrorists not only for ideological reasons, but also to counter the rising Indian influence in Afghanistan.

The US had recently expressed its concerns regarding Pakistan’s inability to handle homegrown terror. In its recent ‘US annual country report’ for the year 2017, the US had said that the Islamic terror groups like Jaish-e-Mohammad and Lashkar-e-Taiba are constantly creating threats in the Indian sub-continent and that Pakistan did not pay adequate attention to the US concerns over terrorism in 2017.

Reportedly, Since 2002, Pakistan has received more than $33 billion as assistance from the United States, of which it has received $14 billion alone in the form of CSF, a US Defence Department to reimburse allies who have supported the US in counterinsurgency operations.

Here is why furious CJI Ranjan Gogoi came down heavily on The Wire

“We don’t think anyone of you deserves a hearing”, Chief Justice of India, Ranjan Gogoi and his bench opined in the matter concerning the CBI and its two top officials, Director Alok Verma and his deputy Rakesh Asthana.

The Supreme Court was enraged as to how the leftist propaganda website The Wire accessed Alok Verma’s responses to the queries of Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) which were supposed to be in a sealed cover.

CJI went on to chastise the litigant by observing:

“We expressed that highest degree of confidentiality should be maintained and this litigant takes the papers and shares it with everyone. Our respect for this institution is not shared by anyone for some strange reason”

In the report that The Wire published, it claims that Verma questions the integrity of CVC as an independent investigator. He also alleges that “the CVC seems to be on a roving expedition to cast aspersions on my integrity and impartiality.” The CVC is looking into four specific charges against Verma that Special Director Asthana made against him. These include, One, his role in deliberately letting people off the hook in the IRCTC Case involving convicted Former Bihar CM Lalu Prasad Yadav. Two, creating roadblocks in Moin Qureshi case. Three, inducting IPS officers in CBI whose records were not clean and four, tipping off an ex-deputy director of Enforcement Directorate about possible raids at his house.

The Wire published Director Alok Verma’s response to these allegations wherein he says, in the IRCTC Case, Bihar Deputy CM Sushil Modi and an official of PMO were following up the case and adds that he did not want to rush through the case “without following the due process.” He also goes on to claim that “Asthana was a party in each of his decisions, which the special director now alleges to be a procedural violation.”

One must realise that these are allegations and counters by two top officials of the CBI regarding matters now being heard by the Apex Court. Media running these have implications on National Security and that is why perhaps, the CJI was upset at the leak.

When the CJI gave the TheWire’s retort to Alok Verma’s lawyer, Fali Nariman, he suggested that the SC should summon the person who ran the story

“What can we do with all these people (media) snooping around? Wanting to know this, wanting to know that. This was completely unauthorised. I’m very disturbed by this. I would suggest you summon the person who has carried this story. How can this come?”

Meanwhile, sensing trouble, The Wire tried to downplay the incident by tweeting “These are the stories The Wire published based on Alok Verma’s responses to a questionnaire the CVC sent him. These have nothing to do with Verma’s reply to the CVC’s final report, which the Supreme Court wanted in a sealed cover.”

This clarification of The Wire and the submission made by Fali Nariman opens up more questions on the leak.

Although Nariman clarified that there was no violation, the Apex Court didn’t seem to be impressed with that argument.

It remains to be seen if the Editors at The Wire will be called in for Contempt of Court under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.

The Act clearly states the following:

Section 7 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971:

PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO PROCEEDING IN CHAMBERS OR IN CAMERA NOT CONTEMPT EXCEPT IN CERTAIN CASES:

Section 7(1)(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971:

Where the court, on grounds of public policy or in the exercise of any power vested in it, expressly prohibits the publication of all information relating to the proceeding or of information of the description which is published.

Sec 7(1)(d) of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971:

Where the information relates to a secret process, discovery or invention which is an issue in the proceedings.

Sec 7(2) of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971:

Without prejudice to the provisions contained in subsection (1) a person shall not be guilty of contempt of court for publishing the text or a fair and accurate summary of the whole, or any part, of an order made by a court sitting in chambers or in camera, unless the court has expressly prohibited the publication thereof on grounds of public policy, or for reasons connected with public order or the security of the State, or on the ground that it contains information relating to secret process, discovery or invention, or in exercise of any power vested on it.

One can argue that considering the matter involves the top investigating agency of the country, the leak of sealed information to the media is an issue of public order and since the reporters of The Wire cast their doubts over the role of the Prime Minister’s Office in their subsequent reports, this might affect the security of the state as well.

All of this makes us question if The Wire and its reporters want to purposely present Alok Verma’s side of the story to help him garner public sympathy and somehow manage to tarnish the image of the Modi Government, whom the TheWire and its reporters love to hate.

It also raises doubts as to whose interests are The Wire serving, by dragging the name of National Security Advisor and other Intelligence Officers, one wonders what effect it will have on the morale of our investigating agencies.

After Twitter’s ‘caste’ row, Manish Tewari says Brahmins should accept their fate as Jews did

Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey’s maiden trip to India had its fair share of controversies. Netizens got quite furious when he posed with a far-left Hinduphobic slogan on a placard that read ‘Smash Brahminical Patriarchy’. ‘Brahminical’ is often used as a code-word to attack Hinduism just as anti-Semites use ‘Zionists’ to spread hatred against Jews.

Congress leader Manish Tewari is the latest to join the debate.


Manish Tewari tweeted that ‘Anti-Brahminism’ is the reality of Indian politics. In the post-Mandal era, the same got accentuated in North-Indian politics. He added that we (as in Brahmins) are the ‘new Jews’ and we must just learn to live with it.

Mandal Commission was set up in 1979 by Prime Minister Morarji Desai to identify socially or educationally backward classes of India. The report recommended reservations to the scheduled caste, scheduled tribes and other backward classes to 49%. While the report was submitted in 1983, it was implemented only in 1992 amidst widespread protests. Criticising the reservation system, which focuses on caste over economic status, is often dubbed as ‘Brahminical privilege’. Hence, it is politically incorrect to be critical of the reservation system.

Although there were mixed reactions to Tewari’s tweet, with some looking it as support for Jack, Tewari’s sentiments are not unique or new. A 2008 Outlook article talks about how being against “Brahminism” is a part and parcel of Indian politics. In the article, researcher Jakob De Roover draws parallels between the Jews in Europe and Brahmins in India.

To be against “Brahminism” is part and parcel of the political correctness of progressive scholars in twenty-first-century India, much like being against Muslims is part of the message of their Hindutva colleagues. This indicates that something is very wrong with the Indian academic debate. Promotion of animosity towards a religious tradition or its followers is not acceptable today, but it becomes truly perverse when the intelligentsia endorses it.

Jakob mentions the striking similarities between the Jews in Europe and Brahmins in India like the stereotypes about them. While Jews are described as conniving people who could go to any lengths to personal gains, Brahmins are often described as oppressors. He explains that in both cases, the historians have claimed to have produced ‘evidence’ which cannot really be considered as one.

He points out that when anti-Brahminical people are countered with facts that Brahmins in a major part of the country are not as powerful, and are in fact, poor, they resort to ad hominem by claiming that Brahmins were the ones who manipulated kings and politicians behind the scene.

If you observe the Twitter discourse, self-proclaimed Dalit rights activists are out to set right the historical wrong done to them. As a sample, you could perhaps read the comments that would be targeted at me on the basis of my surname, Sharma (post-marriage) and Mehta (maiden), attacked for being a Brahmin, a ‘place of privilege’, speaking on the caste system.

Targeting of Brahmins, which is politically safe in India, with the ulterior motive of fueling divide in the country is not unheard of. We had earlier seen how Pakistan based propaganda websites indulged in such deeds. Thus, some people seeing red flag over an ‘outsider’ Jack holding this poster is bound to raise a few eyebrows

Hence, it would be interesting to see reactions of the ‘intellectual’ friends of Congress on Manish Tewari’s tweet where he takes a sympathetic view on the Brahmin community. Especially since now Rahul Gandhi now identifies himself as a ‘Janeu-dhaari Brahmin‘, the avatar of Congress President that was discovered during the run-up to Gujarat elections last year.

1984 Anti-Sikh riots: 34 years later, court awards death penalty to a convict, life term to another

0

Delhi’s Patiala House Court on Tuesday declared the death sentence for convict Yashpal Singh and announced life imprisonment for another convict Naresh Sehrawat for their involvement in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.

According to the reports, on November 15, both of them were convicted for killing two young Sikhs in Delhi’s Mahipalpur area after the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was assassinated. The verdict was pronounced inside Delhi’s Tihar Jail due to security concerns and the previous attack on the convicts on the premises.

The court announced the quantum of sentence in the double murder case amidst huge security outside the court. The court along with severe punishments has also ordered both convicts to pay Rs.35 lakh as fine. The two convicts, Naresh Sherawat, and Yashpal Singh were held guilty by the court for killing 24-year-old Hardev Singh and 26-year-old Avtar Singh thirty-four years ago on November 1, 1984, at Mahipalpur village in south Delhi.

“The prosecution was able to prove beyond reasonable doubt that both accused persons took out the victims, who were hiding inside a room, injured them with dangerous weapons with the intention to kill and threw them down from the first floor, which caused the death of Hardev Singh and Avtar Singh,” Additional Sessions Judge Ajay Pandey said while convicting them.

The Delhi Police had closed the case in 1994 for lack of evidence. However, it was further investigated by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) instituted by the Home Ministry. Reportedly, this is the first sentencing in the case after the Special Investigation Team (SIT) took over the probe in 2015.

We had earlier reported regarding a witness named Cham Kaur identifying senior Congress leader Sajjan Kumar in the 1984 Anti-Sikh pogrom causing huge embarrassment to the Congress. Cham Kaur had also alleged that she has offered Rs 5 lakh not to depose any statements in the court against Congress leader.

The 1984 Anti-Sikh riots took place aftermath of the assassination of the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, which resulted in brutal killings of more than 2800 people according to official figures. Congress leaders Sajjan Kumar and Jagdish Tytler were directly accused of large role in orchestrating the 1984 anti-Sikh riots in India.