Tuesday, August 4, 2020
Home Opinions 'Abrahamic Hindutva' – a fictitious term with force-fitted analysis

‘Abrahamic Hindutva’ – a fictitious term with force-fitted analysis

Tufail Ahmad, who has gained prominence in the last couple of years due to his criticism of Jihad and Islamic terrorism, has been talking about ‘Abrahamic Hindutva’ lately. Although the definition of this term and its description wasn’t clear as he had restricted this term to conversations on Twitter, he has written an article in Firstpost elucidating what he means by the term, and why is it a threat to Indian civilization.

In this article, I’ll be critiquing his thesis of Abrahmic Hindutva in order to show that he has essentially created an imaginary issue and controversy.

Tufail writes:

The argument is not what the Vedas taught when they were created, but what set of ideas prevail currently in the minds of the people who describe themselves wrongly as Hindus. To understand this phenomenon, I described Abrahamic Hindutva as “Hinduism influenced by Islam” and as a concept underpinned by “Hindu theology.” I also noted that Abrahamic Hindutva denotes “a growing inability of Hindu youths to comprehend their Hindu identity as sufficient in itself – without a reference to Islam and Christianity.

Although Tufail mentions that Abrahamic Hindutva is Hinduism influenced by Islam, he fails to give evidence of which prominent Hindu sage or seer in the current time has given this doctrine of Hinduism influenced by Islam. When one ideology is influenced by other, one must give the evidence of its influence.

If he means that Hindus are adopting intolerant means of Muslims and that they are seeking parity with Christianity and Islam, he should mention it in such words. And in that case, the issue is more socio-political than theological. As in the case of Sanatan Dharma, there is clear demarcation between dharma and politics, and any bunch of political group advocating any doctrine will have no bearing on Hinduism. Yet, he uses the term “Hindu theology”.

Also, Tufail fails to give evidence of how these Hindu youths can’t comprehend without a reference to Islam and Christianity. Do these Hindu youths invoke Jesus and Muhammad while tracing their Hindu roots? I seriously doubt so.

He further writes:

Some people frown at the mention of “Hindu theology”, but the ideas currently prevailing in the minds of the cow vigilantes are of theological nature – even if not deriving from Hindu scriptures – and are identical to Islam’s blasphemy law. Muslims believe they must kill you if you insult Prophet Muhammad. Hindus similarly believe that they should kill you if you harm the cow. The theological views associated with Prophet Muhammad and the cow are identical and murderous.

When anyone uses the term “theology”, he needs to give the scriptural reference in order to be considered it under the domain of theology. Tufail can’t just insist on using the term despite knowing that it’s wrong. Which is why he tries to preempt the criticism by saying “some people frown”. They have every reason to!

The issue of cow vigilantes is economic in nature and seldom religious. Cow vigilantes only exist as cattle smugglers exist, and the collusion between authorities responsible for maintaining law and order and smugglers leave people with no other option than defending their private property, which carries immense value for them. On the other hand, the blasphemy laws of Islam are sanctioned by Islam.

Tufail doesn’t give any reference of any scripture of Hinduism advocating for murder of a beef eater. I hope he hasn’t fallen for wrong claims of ‘liberals’ who have earlier been caught inventing fake shlokas of Manusmriti to justify their own assumptions and agenda.

If we look at the evidence of his assertion, we find that Hindus don’t believe as he says because had that been the case, there would have been numerous murders happening across India everyday. So many people organised beef parties and have put up pictures on Facebook of them eating beef just to spite Hindus, how many have been killed? While Basirhat in Bengal was up in flames for one Facebook post, and there are so many such examples showcasing real Abrahamic traits, which Tufail wants to associate with Hindutva.

Furthermore, how many gau-rakshaks have claimed that they are attacking cow smugglers or beef eaters because shloka X from shastra Y says ‘kill all beef eaters’? While every Jihadi murdering a blasphemer or a kaafir can cite you which verse of Islam inspired him. Even Allama Iqbal praised one such murderer who killed a blasphemer. Here, gau-rakshaks are being condemned by one and all for indulging in violence.

Essentially, if Tufail must use “theology”, he must cite, using credible sources, a widely followed Hindu scripture that calls for murder of beef eaters. In absence of that, he is giving an imaginary theological basis of this conflict, which is largely economical and outcome of weak law and order.

Tufail further continues:

Much like jihadis’ argument that each Muslim must take up arms because there is no Caliphate to authorise jihad, Hindu youths too think that India is no Hindu rashtra and therefore a Hindu should take law in their own hands.

Read carefully. While Tufail presents a Jihadi’s argument (and that is a matter of record) he gets into the minds of Hindu youths and assumes what they must be thinking.

While his mind-reading abilities are admirable, he is being very unfair and dishonest. The motive and inspiration for waging Jihad is independent of whether a Caliphate exists or not. There are enough verses of Quran to motivate people. Furthermore, Tufail virtually equates the concept of a Caliphate with that of a Hindu rashtra, which is like comparing apples and oranges.

Sanatan Dharma being the predominant worldview and culture of India makes India a Hindu Rashtra but not a Hindu state. They don’t need to take arms for an entity which already exists. Tufail needs to differentiate between rashtra (nation) and rajya (state).

Even if we are to assume that Tufail loosely used the term and he meant a state where non-Hindus are relegated to second class citizens as one witnesses in Islamic nations, he needs to give examples of those Hindu youths who have apparently taken up arms to achieve it. I can’t find them anywhere except in imaginary reports of New York Times and Washington Post. If they exist, I want sedition charges applied against them, as armed rebellion against the state can’t be tolerated.

In next paragraphs, he goes on to define two types of Hindutva which aren’t relevant for my critique. However, I’m perplexed when he quotes Supreme Court’s comment on definition of Hindutva, for this term can be best understood by quoting Savarkar who had coined this term.

Tufail also writes that the definition of Hindutva by Supreme court fails to give the theological basis for cow vigilantes. It’s the backward reading of history in retrospective manner. This sentence evidently points out that he is seeking theological basis of something which isn’t connected with theology at all.

Quoting him again:

In this sense, Abrahamic Hindutva is a religious fundamentalism and a type of jihadism typical to Islam. In recent years, it has been seen that groups of Hindu youths have entered parks and shopping malls to prevent youths from celebrating the Valentine’s Day.

These lines perfectly reveal the fragile empirical foundation of his thesis and the false analogy which he has created.

Jihad, which has killed crores of people since the beginning of Islam is being equated with the acts of handful of idiots opposing Valentine’s Day.

This false equivalence would have been laughable, but it is tragic in the sense that Jihadists murdering kaafirs, confiscating their property, destroying their places of worship, and raping their women ceaselessly for last 1400 years are being compared with few youths protesting against a non-religious festival. Too much for logic!

In next few paragraphs, Tufail invokes the myth of Hindu terror created by Congress to malign Hindus, for substantiating his hypothesis of Abrahamic Hindutva. As the myth of Hindu terror has been debunked time and again, I’ll avoid myself from repetitions.

He accuses Abrahamic Hindus of carrying out the agenda of homogenization and to prove his hypothesis, he cites another manufactured issue which is Hindi imposition. The attempt of promotion of Hindi by central government which is in accordance of Official Languages Act of 1963 is characterized as an agenda of Abrahamic Hindutva! If promoting Hindi is Abrahamic Hindutva agenda then the Constituent Assembly of India can be called Abrahamic Hindus who had designated Hindi as official language of India.

The campaign of Ghar-Wapsi is portrayed as another aspects of Abrahamic Hindutva by Tufail, as Hinduism doesn’t give any room to conversion, and this is a departure from established practices. Although Tufail is correct in his assessment that Hinduism is not proselytizing in nature, it doesn’t forbid anyone from returning to its fold.

People who were converted by sword have all the rights to return to their native faith without any coercion. Founders of Vijayanagara empire, Harihar and Bukka Raya were converted into Islam forcibly when they were children but they returned to their old faith for building world’s most illustrious empire in that time period. They were guided by Madhavacharya. Will Tufail assert that Madhavacharya was also practicing Abrahamic Hindutva?

Further, Tufail tries to deconstruct the idea of Hindu identity by resorting to lies and distortions. For example, he says that the idea of Hindu identity is very recent and no king in the history had called himself Hindu before British rule, and that Hindavi Swaraj of Shivaji was based on the Hindavi movement created by Amir Khusro, essentially a linguistic movement.

Tufail is factually wrong here as Bukka Raya I of Vijayanagara empire called himself Hinduraya Suratrana in 14th century. Also, the idea of Hindavi Swaraj was based on the self-rule of Hindus, having no connection whatsoever with the term used by Amir Khusro.

Tufail then quotes Ram Jethmalani as following:

The word Hinduism did not exist before 1830″ and “There is no mention of the terms ‘Hindu’ or ‘Sanatana Dharma’ in the Vedas, Puranas or any other religious text prior to 1830 AD. Nor are they found in any inscription or in any record of foreign travellers to India before English rule. The term ‘Hindusthan’ was first used in the 12th century by Muhammad Ghori, who dubbed his new subjects ‘Hindus’.

While one can easily infer that Hinduism being a word ending with -ism suffix is English creation, nobody claims it otherwise. But when Jethmalani asserts that Sanatan Dharma doesn’t have any reference in any religious text, he is terribly wrong. Manusmriti does mention Dharma Sanatan and so does Bhagvatpuarana. Sanatan Dharma means the Dharma which is eternal.

The importance of term Dharma can be gauged from the fact that Yudhishthir says in Mahabharata that it’s the most difficult thing to define Dharma. Dharmashastras deliberate in significant details about Dharma, its attributes, its authority, its importance and other such things.

The term Hindu was originally used by Persians instead of using Sindhu. Bharatvarsh is known as Sapta Sindhu is Vedas. In the Indo-European languages, there is lot of references of words containing ‘s’ being pronounced as ‘h’ in Persian. So, Jethmalani is looking at the wrong place when he seeks to uncover the antiquity of the term Hindu by restricting his search to India only. When we look at use of term Hindu in Persia, the first such inscription is of King Darius I dating back to 6th century BC. Maybe, Tufail needs to brush up his history and also needs to quote authentic historians while dealing with history instead of quoting a lawyer.

When we examine the hypothesis of Abrahamic Hindutva propounded by Tufail holistically, we find that it’s the classical case of narrative fallacy and confirmation bias together.

Tufail has already assumed that something like Abrahmic Hindutva exists and forcibly fits some evidence from here and there in random manner to prove his hypothesis. This is what narrative fallacy does to anyone’s analysis. When Tufail has imbibed this narrative, he goes on to quote distorted facts, some unknown organizations, and sporadic incidents to confirm his hypothesis. That amounts to confirmation bias.

As Communists have created the narrative of distinction between Hinduism and Hindutva, Tufail has done the same to create the distinction between Hindutva and Abrahamic Hindutva.

As of now, Abrahamic Hindutva exists in Tufail’s imagination, and it has to be quarantined there if Hindus have to survive this narrative war, which was inflicted upon them by the British and furthered by the cheerleaders of the Raj.

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

Satish Kumarhttp://www.objectiveviews.WordPress.com
Committed to Engineering. Having affairs with Philosophy. Heart goes to Linguistics.

Trending now

Aditya Thackeray finally breaks his silence on the death of Sushant Singh Rajput and allegations of ‘cover-up’: Here is what he said

Aditya Thackeray has given statement days after reports linked him to the death of Sushant Singh Rajput

Despite the negative media attention, RSS forges forward: Here’s why

It was none other than married women who were a part of the RSS that stepped up and made sure surveys were conducted in multiple villages across India.

Mughal descendant Prince Tucy calls Owaisi a ‘joker’, says it is his family’s wish to build the Ram Mandir

The self-proclaimed Mughal heir, Prince Tucy called AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi a joker for objecting to PM Modi's visit to Ayodhya for the bhoomi pujan ceremony of the Ram Mandir

Akhilesh Yadav as Chief Minister of UP banned the 84-kosi parikrama around the Ram Janmabhoomi. Read details

Akhilesh Yadav tried his best to prevent Hindus from practising their religious faith with regards to Shri Rama at Ayodhya.

Five forms of apartheid that were wiped out when Article 370 was removed

It will be a year since Article 370 was abrogated and Jammu & Kashmir finally became an integral part of India without any riders attached.

Ram Lalla is not ‘Sabke Ram’, such claims are designed to weaken the Hindu claim to their own Gods

Ahead of the Ram Mandir Bhoomi Pujan ceremony, a narrative of 'Sabke ram' is being created to deny the Hindu claim to Rama.

Recently Popular

Here is why #BabyPenguin is trending on Twitter, and why Aaditya Thackeray is called so by some

Yuva Sena registered complaint against twitter user for calling Aaditya Thackeray "Baby Penguin" and Uddhav Thackeray "Aurangzeb"

How one call from Chief Minister Narendra Damodardas Modi changed my views from ‘Why Ram Mandir’ to ‘Mandir Wahin Banayenge’

As we get closer to the dream of Bhavya Ram Mandir coming true, my perception of importance of the Ram Mandir underwent a transformation

Filmmaker Ram Gopal Varma has a prolonged meltdown, announces a movie on Arnab Goswami, “Arnab, The News Prostitute”

Ram Gopal Varma vented his spleen against the Republic TV Editor-in-Chief in a series of tweets on Twitter.

“Will believe in coronavirus if Amit Shah dies”: Shaheen Bagh ‘activist’ Aiman Rizwi urges Muslims to pray for his death

Rizwi also strongly believes that Coronavirus is a myth and propagated to conceal failures of Modi government.

Delhi Police confirm OpIndia report, say that Tahir Hussain has confessed he had planned the Delhi riots to teach Hindus a lesson

Tahir Hussain confesses before Delhi police that he had planned the Delhi Riots, collected materials in advance for the same

Why it’s wrong to call Aatish Taseer a ‘bastard’ even if he is one

All Amit Shah ever did to Taseer was revoke a privilege that allowed him to circumvent the usual visa application process that common people go through.

Aditya Thackeray finally breaks his silence on the death of Sushant Singh Rajput and allegations of ‘cover-up’: Here is what he said

Aditya Thackeray has given statement days after reports linked him to the death of Sushant Singh Rajput

Indian Union Muslim League calls emergency meeting over Congress support for Ram Mandir

IUML has called an emergency meeting of its top officials on Wednesday after learning about the statements by several Congress leaders in favour of Ram Mandir.

On the anniversary of 370 abrogation, Pakistan releases new political map claiming Jammu and Kashmir and Gujarat’s Junagadh as its own

Abrogation of Article 370 continues to sting Pakistan as it releases a new political map, laying sovereign claim on Jammu and Kashmir and thereby junking its long-held position of fighting for the self-determination of Kashmiris

Despite the negative media attention, RSS forges forward: Here’s why

It was none other than married women who were a part of the RSS that stepped up and made sure surveys were conducted in multiple villages across India.

‘Naam mita do Babur ka’: BJP leader Vijay Goel recommends renaming ‘Babur road’ in Delhi

The politician superimposed a poster that read '5 August road' on the signboard that earlier carried the name of the Mughal tyrant Babur.

ISIS terrorist from Kerala involved in Afghanistan suicide bombing in Jalalabad: Reports

On Sunday, a terror attack perpetrated by the Islamic State (ISIS) at a prison complex in Jalalabad in Afghanistan has reportedly led to the escape of 300 inmates.

Meerut: Sohail posed as Hindu, tried to kidnap Dalit girl when exposed, family alleges police of inaction

The family alleged that Sohail was posing as a Hindu to befriend the Dalit girl from Meerut for the last six months.

‘Stones and bottles are not firearms’: Indira Jaising defends Jamia hoodlums in Delhi HC, seeks inquiry on ‘police brutality’

Indira Jaising and other attorneys today submitted their argument in Delhi HC seeking independent inquiry into the alleged police atrocities in the Jamia Millia Islamia University.

Delhi: Anwar pretends to be a Hindu, befriends a woman and rapes her for months on pretext of marriage

As per a report by Jagran, Anwar even took lakhs of rupees from the woman under the pretext of marriage.

Mughal descendant Prince Tucy calls Owaisi a ‘joker’, says it is his family’s wish to build the Ram Mandir

The self-proclaimed Mughal heir, Prince Tucy called AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi a joker for objecting to PM Modi's visit to Ayodhya for the bhoomi pujan ceremony of the Ram Mandir

Related Articles

Connect with us

238,826FansLike
421,305FollowersFollow
289,000SubscribersSubscribe