Media and Congress spread lies about Railways tender won by Reliance Jio

OpIndia also accessed RailTel's responses to the clarifications sought by the tender respondents (Airtel, Vodafone, Jio and BSNL). Interestingly, the only operator which sought more clarification about the rate variation clause was Reliance Jio.

In March 2018, Indian Railways issued a tender through Railtel India to supply mobile connections under CUG (Closed User Group) to around 3.78 lakh Railways employees across the nation.

Railways is currently using CUG mobile connections from Bharti Airtel, but the current contract will expire on 31 December 2018. A Railway Board order dated 20 November 2018 announced that Reliance Jio had won the contract to implement the new CUG which would be effective from 1 January 2019.

On 30 November, the official Twitter handle of Congress tweeted a news article alleging that Reliance Jio had violated the tender norms. Congress further claimed that only PM Modi’s ‘friends’ are doing well in this economy.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

A similar insinuation was made by a pro-Congress Twitter user @sidmtweets

The article quoted by Congress has been published by a portal News Central 24×7 which was previously caught spreading fake news. The said article, in turn, quotes another article published by The Indian Express to insinuate that Reliance Jio had violated the tender norms. The Indian Express claims:

The contentious clause, a new introduction in the tender process this time, stipulates that “the rates across different plans will not vary more than 50 per cent of minimum data rates quoted in any of the plan.” Sources said some bidders have alleged that the condition restricted their pricing offer while the same did not seem to have been applied on Jio—an allegation the company has denied.

The Indian Express further claims that Bharti Airtel, which was one of the bidders, had highlighted this alleged violation by Jio:

Airtel submitted the second lowest financial bid of Rs 3.37 crore per month excluding taxes, whereas Jio’s offer was for Rs 2.92 crore per month. Sources in RailTel said that Airtel has highlighted the fact that Jio’s top plan for 60 GB data, which is offered for Rs 125, is 86 per cent costlier than its 30 GB plan offered at Rs 67 per month. When contacted, Bharti Airtel declined to comment.

According to this claim, Airtel has claimed violation by Jio because the highest tariff offered is 86% more than the lowest tariff. However, this conclusion is not correct, as we explain below.

OpIndia accessed the tender document to understand this so-called “contentious clause”, which has been mentioned in Appendix B of the document. The appendix contains specifications of four different mobile plans required by Railways. One of them is for bulk SMS while the remaining three are to be used by Railways employees.

It should be noted that Railways required that all the plans must offer unlimited voice calling, roaming and 100 SMS per day for free. The only difference in the plans is the amount of data bundled in the plan.

Appendix B of the tender document

As highlighted above, the clause says, “the rates across different plans will not very (sic) more than 50% of minimum data rates quoted in any of the plans”. By definition, ‘rate’ is always per unit. Thus the term ‘data rates’ means the price per GB of data, i.e. the correct interpretation of the clause is that the difference in the highest and lowest prices per GB of data (across different plans) should not be more than 50% of the lowest price per GB quoted in the plans.

Hence, Airtel’s interpretation of the clause, as claimed by The Indian Express, is wrong as they compare monthly tariffs instead of data rates (price per GB). This is further validated from the sample calculations given in section 3.6.1 of the tender document, wherein the difference between the highest and lowest tariffs is much more than 50%.

Sample calculations provided in the tender document

In Jio’s case, the lowest price per GB of data has been offered in the 60 GB plan, while the highest price per GB has been offered in the 30 GB plan. More importantly, the price highest price variation is 15% of the lowest price, which is compliant with the clause explained above.

Prices offered by Jio as per media reports

OpIndia also accessed RailTel’s responses to the clarifications sought by the tender respondents (Airtel, Vodafone, Jio and BSNL). Interestingly, the only operator which sought more clarification about the rate variation clause was Reliance Jio.

This begs the question: if Airtel had any doubts about the meaning of that clause, why did they not seek more clarification from RailTel? Or did The Indian Express invent ‘sources’ who claimed that Airtel had alleged violation by Jio?


Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

West Bengal: Ex-IPS officer commits suicide, leaves note saying Mamata Banerjee victimised him for 10 years

Citing his alleged harassment and suffering as the reason, Dutt has written, "I decided to take the drastic step to highlight genuine problems faced by honest officers in West Bengal, and other parts of India."
As Pakistan panics over possible action from India, India takes careful and calculated steps

Pakistan Army begins preparing for war, speculations rife in Kashmir over late night movements

PM Modi had stated earlier that not only India will take all necessary steps to isolate Pakistan internationally, but it has also instructed the security forces to plan and execute retaliatory action.
Non-bailable warrant issued against Arnab Goswami by Srinagar Court

‘Our journalism won’t be impeded’: Non-bailable warrant issued against Arnab Goswami by Srinagar court in defamation case filed by PDP MLA

Srinagar District Magistrate Court has issued a non-bailable warrant against Republic TV chief, Arnab Goswami in a defamation case filed by PDP MLA Naeem Akhtar.

This is why Neena Gupta wants no one to wish Pritish Nandy even a Happy Birthday

Pritish Nandy 'stole' Masaba's birth certificate and printed in his magazine without Neena Gupta's permission

Congress deletes video where Rahul Gandhi was seen dancing shortly after the Pulwama attack

After Congress' lies against the Prime Minister were exposed, Congress proceeded to delete the tweet where Rahul Gandhi was seen dancing after the Pulwama terror attack.
Pakistan's government acts as a subordinate of its military and Islamic fundamentalists

It appears Pakistan is scared of India: Masood Azhar’s veiled threat to Imran Khan against any govt action

Masood Azhar said in his weekly address, ''Pakistan's response to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's threats post Pulwama was rather lukewarm and lacklustre. It appears Pakistan is scared of India.''
Image Source: Twitter

Fearing India’s retaliation, Pakistan cancels leaves of its troops, uses flares to light up night sky to see movement of Indian troops

Pakistani administration has asked people to stay in underground bunkers, which could protect them from shelling or any form of attacks which could come from the other side of the border.

Pakistanis get scared about attack by India after seeing their own Air Force fighter jets flying over civilian areas

Several people posted on social media that India has dropped bombs over Sialkot in Pakistan

Fact Check: Was PM Narendra Modi doing a photoshoot in Uttarakhand after the Pulwama terror attack?

PM Modi had completed before his forest visit in Corbett National Park before the Pulwama attack
Foreign trips and MoUs signed: Read how 5 years of Modi trumps 10 years of Manmohan Singh

Foreign trips and MoUs signed: Read how 5 years of Modi trumps 10 years of Manmohan Singh

In terms of signing international deals and MoU, PM Narendra Modi has delivered 322% more than PM Manmohan Singh at only 18% additional costs

Latest articles

Connect with us

138,953FansLike
111,613FollowersFollow
23,654SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these