Home News Reports Supreme Court refuses to stay amendment passed by government in the SC/ST Act

Supreme Court refuses to stay amendment passed by government in the SC/ST Act

The government had made an amendment to the SC-ST Act to reverse the SC order diluting few provisions in the Act

A Supreme Court bench headed by Justice AK Sikri has refused to stay the Schedule Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2018, passed by Central Government. By the Amendments, the government had inserted section 18(A) in the SC/ST act, in order to reverse the Apex Court’s March 2018 verdict diluting the Act citing its rampant misuse.

The Supreme Court bench observed that plea challenging its March 2018 verdict and plea challenging the Amendment Act, must be heard together and said that “No interim order can be passed in these matters”. The pleas against the Amendment Act, 2018 were filed by Senior advocate Vikas Singh and advocate Gopal Sankaranarayana, who alleged that Parliament had “arbitrally” decided to amend the law, without any regards to its misuse.

Attorney General K K Venugopal, representing the central government, also said that the court should first hear the review petition filed by the government against the Supreme Court order diluting the act before any new petition is taken up in the matter.

- Ad - - article resumes -

In March 2018, the Supreme Court while passing the verdict in the Dr Subhash Kashinath Mahajan vs The State Of Maharashtra case had ruled that additional safeguards must be provided to civil servants before arresting them in a complaint registered under Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), 1989. It had said that the approval of an appointing authority, a non-public servant and an S.S.P is required for arresting a public servant under the act. The safeguards were added to avoid misuse of the act against public servants.

This had raised concerns among the SC/ST community. They had also felt that the judgement would dilute the provisions of the act which protect the community from atrocities. This had given birth to widespread pandemonium in the country.

Following this, the Modi government had filed a review petition in the Supreme Court against this ruling which contended that the order will weaken the provision of this act, which could result in more violence against Dalits.

Not only this, but the government had also tabled an amendment in parliament, to neutralize the dilutions imposed by the court. It nullified need of conduct of a preliminary enquiry before registration of an FIR, or to seek approval of any authority prior to arrest of an accused, and to restore the provisions of Section 18 of the Act. It also denied the alleged person right to go for Anticipatory Bail.  The Amdnement was passed in Lok Sabha on 6th August 2018. In Rajya Sabha too the act was passed subsequently.

The bench now had escalated the matter to Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, to ascertain whether the review petitions and the plea against amendments, are to be heard or not.

Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.

Big Story

Strange rumours are coming out of Kashmir. Shah Faesal, supposedly, is Doval's stooge.

2019 World Cup Is Here!

Catch the latest on Cricket World Cup as it unfolds, special coverage by Opindia

To Advertise on Opindia.com Click here

NDTV’s Interim CEO Suparna Singh resigns with immediate effect

NDTV interim CEO Suparna Singh, whose appointment as CEO was not approved by I&B ministry, has stepped down
Hartosh Singh Bal resorts to factually incorrect details to target Amit Shah

Fact-Check: Unlike Chidambaram who tried to escape from law, Amit Shah resolutely faced trial and was acquitted

Hartosh Singh Bal equated P Chidambaram's disgraceful escape with Amit Shah's tenacity to face the law

P Chidambaram finally arrested by CBI after officers scale wall of his residence as the gates were locked

Chidambaram arrested from his residence after he addressed a press conference at Congress office

Political Editor of The Hindu condones violence by Congress workers who beat up a man who shouted ‘Chidambaram Chor Hai’

Congress worker beats up a man for shouting 'Chidambaram Chor Hai', The Hindu Political Editor Nistula Hebbar shows excitement at the unruly behaviour.

Is Shah Faesal Ajit Doval’s asset? Unlikely, Swati Chaturvedi may be unwittingly helping the central government

Strange rumours are coming out of Kashmir. Shah Faesal, supposedly, is Doval's stooge.

‘Liberal’ hearts bleed as CBI arrests Congress leader Chidambaram after court calls him “kingpin of crime”

Within a few minutes of Chidambaram's arrest, the liberal heart bled for their fallen hero, who once had once co-opted the very same intelligentsia, media and other opinion-makers.

If Congress can’t claim political martyrdom today, the Modi government has only P Chidambaram to thank

After being missing for almost an entire day post the Supreme Court rejecting immediate relief from arrest in the INX media scam case, P Chidambaram went missing.

India Today’s opinion website DailyO folds, shuts down operations, sacks editorial staff

India Today flagship DailyO seems to have folded its operations and sacked its Editorial Staff

Read about the P Chidambaram link in the new FIR filed against NDTV by the CBI

It appears that the INX Media case, the new FIR against NDTV and arrest of P Chidambaram are all interconnected.

Here is why Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy were stopped at the airport and were not allowed to leave the country

Radhika and Prannoy Roy of NDTV have said that they were not allowed to leave the country because of a concocted ICICI loan case. Read about that case in details
Subscribe to Day's Top Stories
[newsletter_form type="minimal"]
- Advertisment -

Latest articles

Connect with us

Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post