Monday, July 22, 2024
HomeLawBombay HC rejects the bail pleas of alleged 'Urban Naxals' Sudha Bharadwaj, Vernon Gonsalves...

Bombay HC rejects the bail pleas of alleged ‘Urban Naxals’ Sudha Bharadwaj, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira

The accused were booked under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act by the Maharashtra police after it began raids in the Bhima Koregaon violence case.

The Bombay HC has today rejected the bail pleas of alleged Urban Naxals Sudha Bharadwaj, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira in the Bhima Koregaon violence case. As per reports, Justice SV Kotwal pronounced the judgement to a packed courtroom in presence of the lawyers representing the three accused.


The bail plea was moved in the month of August and the court had begun hearing on August 27. The court had reserved the judgement on October 7.

Advocate Mihir Desai appeared on behalf of Vernon Gonsalves, Dr.Yug Chaudhary appeared for Sudha Bharadwaj, and Sudeep Pasbola had represented Arun Ferreira. The accused were booked under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act by the Maharashtra police after it began raids in the Bhima Koregaon violence case.

Additional Public Prosecutor Aruna Pai had objected to all three bail petitions. The Pune Police had also stated in court that all three of the accused have been involved with organisations acting as the fronts of the banned Communist Party of India (Maoist).

Read: Urban Naxal arrests: Pune Court rejects bail application of Vernon Gonsalves, Arun Ferreira and Sudha Bhardwaj

The four organisations are, namely, Indian Association of People’s Lawyers (IAPL), Committee for Release of Political Prisoners (CRPP), Persecuted Prisoners Solidarity Committee (PPSC) and Anuradha Gandhi Memorial (AGM).

Earlier, the Supreme Court had granted interim protection from arrest to another alleged Urban Naxal Gautam Navlakha. Navlakha had appealed against an earlier Bombay HC order refusing to quash his FIR.

Bharadwaj, Gonsalves and Ferreira had been locked in Pune’s Yerawada Jail for almost 14 months. They had moved to the Bombay HC after a special judge in Pune had rejected their bail petitions last year.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Real-life Jolly LLB: Judge tells Somnath Bharti that his petition against Bansuri Swaraj is full of typos, cant understand what the petition says

For the unversed, Somnath Bharti had filed a petition against Bansuri Swaraj after losing by a margin of 78,370 votes from the New Delhi Lok Sabha constituency.

Modi govt withdraws 1966 memorandum barring govt servants from participating in RSS activities: Here is how RSS was officially persecuted for years

Notably, the ban on government employees participating in Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) activities was imposed by the Indira Gandhi government in 1966. The Congress government's 1966 decision to ban government employees from partaking in activities of the RSS was a move rooted in political expediency rather than genuine concern for the public interest. The ban sought to stifle the influence of a prominent organization that ideologically opposed the Congress party.

Recently Popular

- Advertisement -