HomeNews ReportsSetback to West Bengal govt: Supreme Court stays Pegasus inquiry by state govt appointed...

Setback to West Bengal govt: Supreme Court stays Pegasus inquiry by state govt appointed commission

The commission had started working despite West Bengal govt assuring the court that it will not work when a Supreme Court-appointed committee is examining the matter

The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the enquiry into the Pegasus case by a judicial constituted by the West Bengal government. A bench headed by the Chief Justice of India expressed unhappiness that the commission constituted by the state govt started working even after the Supreme Court has constituted an independent committee to probe the matter. Moreover, the West Bengal government had assured the Supreme Court that the Inquiry Commission will not proceed with the probe until the apex court hears several petitions filed in the case.

The Supreme Court was hearing an urgent petition filed by NGO Global Village Foundation Charitable Trust, challenging the proceedings of the two-member Judicial Enquiry Commission led by former Supreme Court judge Justice Madan B Lokur. The SC asked West Bengal govt’s lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi what happened to the assurance given by the state govt.

“Mr Singhvi, what is this? Last time you gave the undertaking. We wanted to record you said don’t record. Again you started the inquiry?”, CJI N. V. Ramana asked Singhvi. However, Singhvi replied that the state govt can’t control the commission.

“I said I don’t control the Commission and I’ll convey the constraint. I did. The commission started. Please call their counsel and pass orders. As a State, I can’t restrain the Commission”, he told the court.

The Supreme Court said that it understands the predicament, and ordered a stay on the proceedings of the commission. The court also issued notices to all the parties.

The petitioner NGO was represented by Senior Advocate Harish Salve. The petition was filed on Thursday seeking urgent intervention saying that the West Bengal govt appointed commission is going ahead with the probe after the Supreme Court constituted an independent expert committee to examine the Pegasus allegations, and after the state govt had assured that the committee will not function when the apex court is dealing with the matter.

In August, the West Bengal government had submitted an undertaking with the SC that the commission will not go ahead with the inquiry till the court hears the bunch of pleas on the issue. The state govt had assured this after the apex court had asked them to maintain restrain as the court was already hearing the allegations into the use of Pegasus software.

The court had said that issue is connected with several other issues, and they likely have pan Indian impact, therefore the state govt should wait before the court hears the matter first. The court had not passed on order staying the commission as the state govt had assured that the commission will not start working.

But despite the assurance, the commission started the probe, forcing the Supreme Court to stay its functioning.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

The Indian Express invokes 2023 UNESCO inscription to secularise Garba and vilify Hindu groups for Muslim ban: Here’s how the newspaper’s arguments are flawed

On 19th October, The Indian Express article headlined, "How saffron groups are ‘pushing out’ non-Hindus of Navratri events", cherry-picks a few incidents of confrontations and announcements at Navratri Garba events in Gujarat to weave a narrative that there is a systematic "saffron" campaign of exclusion against Muslims that contradicts the UNESCO's recognition of Garba as inclusive. 

French cities burn, but BBC calls protests ‘Mostly Peaceful’: How Western media applies double standards to France and India

The coverage of the French unrest, when compared with the reporting of CJP demonstrations in India, offers a striking example of how the framing of protests can change depending on the country involved.
- Advertisement -