Home Blog Page 3387

Rajasthan: BJP leader Jitender Gothwal arrested for instigating protest against deceased Dr Archana Sharma, Dausa SP removed, SHO suspended

The Dausa Police on Thursday arrested BJP leader and former MLA Jitender Gothwal for organising a protest against Dr Archana Sharma and allegedly forcing her to commit suicide earlier this week. Dr Sharma was charged with the murder of the patient who died due to known complications during childbirth. Gothwal has been taken by the Dausa police to Lalsot.

As per reports, Gothwal has been arrested under charges of extortion and abetment of suicide. Dausa police have informed that they have so far arrested 32 people in the doctor suicide case.

On March 28, a 22-year-old pregnant woman was brought to Anand hospital run by Dr Archana Sharma and her husband. Though she was provided treatment and a child was delivered, her condition deteriorated and she died due to heavy blood loss. Reportedly, a crowd of around 200 people gathered at the hospital and charged Dr Sharma with medical negligence. An FIR was lodged against her under murder charges, in violation of a standing Supreme Court order.

Unable to handle the distress, Dr Sharma hanged herself in a hospital room and left a suicide note in which she mentioned that the patient had died due to postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) post-delivery, a known medical complication.

Later, Dr Suneet Upadhyay, husband of Dr Sharma accused the local politicians and journalists of spreading misinformation in the case. He said that the local leaders and the journalists had pressurized the police to lodge an FIR against the doctors. He said that BJP’s Shiv Shankar Balya Joshi went to the family of the deceased and promised monetary aid from the CM’s fund.

According to Upadhyay, Joshi and other BJP leaders also forced the police to register the case under section 302 of the IPC. Joshi in one of his Facebook posts had also mentioned that he and his colleagues had staged protests at the Anand Hospital and helped the family of the deceased to get Rs 3 lakh and a house from the government funds.

Also, Gothwal, who was arrested yesterday had tweeted that he was involved in the protests on March 29. “Patient Asha Bairwa died on the spot due to the negligence of the medical department. Reached Lalsot to get justice for her family and sat on a dharna with the people of the village for two hours. Received and provided financial assistance of Rs 10 lakhs”, the tweet read.

Screenshot of the tweet

It is important to note that the family members of the deceased Asha Birwa said on Wednesday that they had not filed any complaint against the doctors. They said that the doctors had taken all efforts to save Asha Birwa but could not because of the heavy blood loss after the delivery. Husband Laluram Bairwa said that he is not educated and that he was made to sign the complaint that was written by someone else.

The government has meanwhile also suspended the officer in charge of the Lalsot police station, Ankit Chaudhary, and ordered the removal of the Dausa Superintendent of Police (SP) over the department’s handling of Dr Sharma’s case.

Video of Christian prayers inside Gangavaram Ram temple goes viral, BJP leaders demand action, police deny

A video of Chrisitan missionary groups occupying a Hindu temple in Andhra Pradesh’s Gangavaram and holding a congregation inside temple premises went viral on Friday, igniting a massive controversy.

BJP National Secretary Sunil Deodhar, who is also in charge of the party unit in Andhra Pradesh, put out a video of the Christian group, led by a pastor, singing hymns and prayers inside a Ram Mandir in a village near Gangavaram.

In the video, it was seen that a white-frock clad pastor was sitting inside the Ram Mandir and singing hymns along with his followers. Behind the pastor, the sanctum of the Ram Mandir can be clearly seen, suggesting that the Christians had entered the Hindu temple to carry out their prayers.

The BJP leader accused Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister YS Jaganmohan Reddy of pushing the conversion agenda in the state. He also accused the church of crossing limits by illegal occupying a Ram Mandir and performing Christian rituals inside a Hindu temple.

He demanded the immediate arrest of all the culprits who entered the temple premises.

Sharing the video of the incident, senior BJP leader Vishnu Vardhan Reddy said there is no place for Hindus in Andhra Pradesh. He alleged that a pastor illegally occupied a Ram temple in Gangavaram and conducted Christian prayers inside the temple.

This is happening due to the appeasement politics of the YSR-Congress government, he said, while demanding strict action against the culprits.

Police denies: What they said

The East Godavari police in Andhra Pradesh have refuted the information that a pastor had “illegally occupied” a Ram temple and conducted a Christian prayer meeting there, reported The News Minute. East Godavari Superintendent of Police M Ravindranath Babu clarified that a family dispute between the woman who organised the prayer meeting and her son had been blown up and falsely distorted into a communal issue.

The police had also taken to Twitter to refute the allegations.

The police has also said that the Hindu and Christian community of the area share cordial relationship.

Sambhaji Maharaj: Understanding the valorous Chhatrapati through his letters and literature

Much of the intellectual discourse catapulted by Hindu historians have painted Shivaji as the original father of Hindu Nationalism, for obvious reasons. Chhatrapati Shivaji asserted the Hindu identity in the mainstream of medieval Indian polity by his establishment of the ‘Hindavi Swarajya’ as an indigenous challenge to external aggression. Today, while there are many upholders to the legacy of the Great Maratha, an unconsented heir to his throne in the form of his elder son, Sambhaji remains one-of-a-kind personalities in the annals of history. In this essay, we explore the story of Sambhaji’s life and his Hindutva through his correspondence with the people of his time.

Born as an unpredictable child with his own whims in the family of Bhonsales, Sambhaji always had his own ways of doing things. In 1680, Shivaji Maharaj had left the Swarajya throne without naming his heir, upon his death. Sambhaji, who was kept confined at the Panhala fort owing to his past shenanigans, managed to crown himself as the next Chhatrapati at Raigad on January 10, 1681. The path to his elevation as a king was however laced with the designs of Soyrabai, the most powerful among Shivaji’s queens, who projected her son Rajaram as the fitting candidate. While Sambhaji managed to outthrow Soyrabai and her son from political relevance quite swiftly, it was for him to win the trust of the court veterans who were miffed with him, much owed to his open idiosyncracies.

Sambhaji’s accession to the throne was anything but a peaceful transition of power in Maratha politics. An array of ministers sympathetic to Soyrabai’s cause were arrested – including Janardanpant Hanmante, Kanhoji Bhandwalkar the famed Peshwa Moropant Pingle alongside Pant Sachiv Annaji Datto whose houses were attacked by Sambhaji’s comrades. Historians have also suggested Rani Soyrabai’s sudden death in the circumstances due to suspected poisoning by Sambhaji’s contrivances.

Samrath Ramdas’ advice to the young Chhatrapati

The cruelties that had marked Sambhaji’s seizure of power had disturbed the ailing Samarth Ramdas who wrote a letter to Sambhaji reminding him of his father’s greatness. Swami Ramdas, a revered saint from the bhakti tradition reminds Sambhaji of his duties as a king and responsibilities towards his subjects. “Remember your father, Shivaji, and compare your actions with his. Do not think of yourselves too highly and learn from him how to live always.” The saint reminds him that while Sambhaji should give up on violence and anger, he should forgive old employees who did so much for the Swarajya and make them work under his wishes.

Smartha Ramdas with Chhatrapati Shivaji, Sant Tukaram Looks by. Courtesy: M V Dhurandar

Furthermore, Swami Ramdas advises Sambhaji of the continued civilizational battle which is to be fought against the Mlecchas (Islamic Invaders) while keeping the flame of Dharma alive. He writes, “बहुत लोक मेळवावे| एक विचारे भरावे| कष्टे करोनी घसरावे| म्लेंच्छांवरी (Gather many people and instil inside them the idea of Swarajya. Prepare yourselves and fall upon the Mlecchas with vengeance).”

Highlighting the cause of Dharma, Ramdas writes, “धर्मासाठी झुंजावे|झुंझोनी अवघ्यासी मारावे || मारिता मारिता घ्यावे|राज्य आपुले (Fight for Dharma, if needed, kill people for achieving the same. Keep striving for it and while you kill, establish your rule).” Ramdas’ advice to impressionable Sambhaji was to remain for a lifetime, after which his transition into serious manhood is clearly visible.

Correspondences with the neighbouring states

When Sambhaji’s succession happened in the Deccan, Rajputana was grappled with a great offensive by Aurangazeb who had decided to take upon the princes’ growing ambition for autonomy. Shivaji Maharaj had expressed his displeasure against Aurangazeb’s targeting of Hindu kings in an open letter before his death. Aurangzeb had ordered his son, Akbar – II to launch an attack against the Rajputs to suppress their growing influence in Delhi affairs. Akbar however proposed that the war should be closed diplomatically on honourable terms. Rattled by his stance, Aurangzeb launched an attack on his own son, following which Akbar along with local Rajput leader Durgadas Rathore flew to Deccan asking Sambhaji for shelter.

In the May of 1981, stationed at the banks of Narmada, Akbar writes a letter to Sambhaji that should single-handedly settle the recent debate on the character of Aurangzeb. He writes,

“Since his coming to the throne, my father Emperor Aurangzeb has formed the deliberate resolution of putting down the Hindus. This is the sole cause of his war against the Rajputs. While in the eyes of God all men are His equal children and deserve impartial protection from their ruler, I became convinced that by such extreme measures, my father would lose his hold on the country and decided to oppose him in this disastrous move. I am, therefore, coming to you as a friend, as your kingdom is out of the Emperor’s reach. The valiant Durgädäs Räthod accompanies me. Please do not entertain any false suspicions about my intentions. If by the grace of God I succeed in my endeavour to depose my father, I shall remain only the nominal master and shall let you exercise all the power. We shall fully cooperate in putting down the Emperor.”

Akbar – II, the rebellious son of Aurangzeb who was one of the most powerful emperors of his times was furthering his hand for an alliance with 22-year-old Sambhaji who had just crowned himself amidst family infighting. The letter is reflective not only of Aurangzeb’s role in history as a religious zealot but also talks much about Sambhaji, whom Akbar saw as a potential ally in ousting his mightful father.

The second letter follows the story when Aurangzeb dispatched Krishna Singh, the only son of Ram Singh of Jaipur (Amber) to keep a watch on the Maratha tactics and his fled son Akbar in the Deccan. Failing upon his duty, Aurangzeb ordered the execution of Krishna Singh which had left his father Ram Singh perplexed. At this juncture, Sambhaji wrote a letter to Ram Singh in Sanskrit discussing the possibility of a pan-Indian Hindu alliance against Aurangzeb.

The Sanskrit letter procured from the Jaipur state archives mentions Sambhaji reminding Ram Singh to take up the cause of Hindutva seriously after the gruesome tactic of Aurangzeb. It says,

“The present wicked Emperor believes that we Hindus have all become effeminate and tint we have lost all regard for our religion. Such an attitude on the part of the Emperor we cannot any longer endure. We cannot put up with anything derogatory to our character as soldiers (Kshatriyas). The Vedas and the codes enjoin certain injunctions of religion…which we cannot allow to be trampled underfoot, nor can we neglect our own duty as kings to our subjects. We are prepared to sacrifice everything, our treasure, our land, our forts, in waging war against this satanic Emperor.”

Sambhaji here can be seen elaborating with Ram Singh over his duty as a Hindu ruler to form a collective challenge against Aurangzeb. While he admires Ram Singh’s valour and his zeal for religion, Sambhaji has highlighted him to be on the right side of history, the side of Dharma.

Sambhaji’s resolution for Dharma

Upon Samarth Ramdas’ enlightenment after ascending the Swarajya throne, Sambhaji made a formal grant of ten thousand Hons every year to his family Goddess Bhavani. The Grant is written in a tone of thankfulness towards the Goddess and details the lives of the Bhonsale family and their connection with the temple. Written in his own handwriting, the Sanskrit letter reflects how Sambhaji’s worldview and how he saw his ancestors. In the grant, Sambhaji has referred to his grandfather Shahaji as ‘Haindav-Dharma-Jeernoddharaka’ – the one who has restored Dharma. On Shivaji, Sambhaji unapologetically bestows the titles of ‘Mleccha-kshaya-dixita’ – the one who has mastered the killing of Islamic invaders and ‘Gau-brahman-pratipalaka’ (The protector of cows and Brahmins).

Grant issued by Chhatrapati Sambhaji with his royal seal at the top

Late Historian Ninad Bedekar has noted that intricacies like the way Sambhaji Maharaj looks upon his ancestors tell us a lot about what legacy he is willing to put himself in. Sambhaji’s associations with Kaviraj Bhushan, the court poet who mastered the Braj Bhasha cultivated his interest in learning many languages – he could manage Marathi, Sanskrit, Hindi, Persian and English all his own. It is known that Sambhaji used to decode the designs of the English stationed in Bombay, and used to personally write to them in their own language. His mastery over Sanskrit is reflected in many ways, but majorly through his verses in Budhbhushanam, his treatise on strategic affairs.

His portfolio of literature includes the works of Nakhshikhant, Nayikabheda and Sathatak written by him in Braj Bhasha. Inspired by his wife Yesubai, he wrote the fiction Nakhshikha, set in the backdrop of Shringarpur.

The eternal sacrifice

The advances of Sambhaji in giving a tough fight against the Portuguese and the Siddis of Janjira was also one of the reasons why The Mughal Emperor arrived in the Deccan. Aurangzeb had cherished a far-fetched dream of capturing the whole of Hindustan and bringing it under the Mughal realm. Upon his arrival in the 1680s, The Nizamshahi followed by the Adilshahi and Qutubshahi fell into a domino effect. It was only the Marathas who were to stand the test of time trapping Aurangzeb in Deccan, who never returned to Delhi until his death in 1707.

In February 1689, Sambhaji alongside Kavi Kalash, the poet were captured by Qutubshahi commander Sheikh Nizam and his son Iklas Khan who were now serving the Mughals at Sangameshwar. The capture of Sambhaji brought much joy to Aurangzeb, who ordered their captivity in Tulapur. Sambhaji, who was Chattrapati of the Hindavi Swarajya was publicly ridiculed upon his capture by the Mughals. Sambhaji and Kavi Kalash were paraded while dressed as clowns and bells tied to their necks mounted on camels. From their camp, they were brought to Aurangzeb’s Darbar with people lined up to see their King stripped of his pride.

The Next day, Aurangzeb made an offer to Sambhaji on his life with the condition to release all his forts and treasury to the emperor. Vehemently, Sambhaji struck the offer and abused Aurangzeb and the Prophet, ‘giving vent to his long pent up sentiments against the Muslim faith,’ Historian G S Sardesai writes. By now, Aurangzeb was rattled to hear the response of his biggest enemy and maintained that he had gone beyond doubt for pardon. What followed was Sambhaji and Kavi Kalash’s prolonged assassination in the jail at Tulapur.

At the outset, Sambhaji’s eyes were taken out while Kalash’s tongue was slit. tortured followed upon Sambhaji every day while his nails were taken out one by one every passing day. While Aurangazeb tried to lure Sambhaji for forgiveness against his demands, Sambhaji was determined enough not to budge. A fortnight later, after bearing the brunt of the tortures, Sambhaji was cut to death on the Amavasya of Phalgun, the last month of the Hindu calendar. While he was partially alive, his limbs were extracted while the flesh was fed to stray dogs. The slain heads of Sambhaji and Kalasha were later exhibited as symbols of Aurangzeb’s triumph over Hindavi Swarajya.

Chhatrapati Sambhaji paid the ultimate prize of his life for upholding his Dharma. Aurangzeb’s brutality knew no boundaries, the genocidal warmonger that he was. The later Marathas including Sambhaji’s wife Yesubai, his half-brother Rajaram and later his wife Tarabai held the bastion of Swarajya in the Deccan in its weakest times. While the Mughal Emperor thought of eliminating the Maratha might after Sambhaji’s death, it only grew into a vast empire in the next century, under the leadership of the Peshwas. Dharma triumphed over Aurangzeb’s Jehad in Sambhaji’s sacrifice.

Sharad Pawar, who had concocted a ’13th bomb blast’ to shield Islamists, now says The Kashmir Files is ‘false propaganda’

NCP chief Sharad Pawar has branded the movie The Kashmir Files as ‘false propaganda’, and has blamed the BJP for ‘creating a poisonous atmosphere’ by using the movie.

As per reports, Pawar was addressing the NCP’s minority unit in Delhi on Thursday. He added that Vivek Agnihotri’s The Kashmir Files movie spreads false propaganda about the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the valley.

Pawar asserted “Such a film should not have been cleared for screening. But it is given tax concessions and those responsible for keeping the country united are encouraging people to watch the film that stokes anger among people.”

Pawar then added that though Kashmiri Pandits had to leave the valley, Muslims in the valley were targeted too. He blamed it all on Pakistani terrorists and BJP. “Pakistan-based terrorist groups were behind the attacks on Kashmiri Pandits and Muslims,” Pawar added.

Pawar added further that if the BJP government actually cared for the Kashmiri Pandits, it would have taken steps for their rehabilitation in the valley, not stoke negative sentiments against “minorities”.

However, Pawar probably forgot that Bitta Karate and Yasin Malik were local Kashmiris, not Pakistanis.

Pawar further slammed the BJP for dragging Jawaharlal Nehru’s name in the controversy. He then used the favourite argument of the Left-liberals on the issue, that VP Singh was the PM and Jagmohan was the governor when the exodus happened. He blamed the then governor Jagmohan who ‘facilitated the departure’ of Kashmiri Pandits from the valley.

As usual, Sharad Pawar did not explain why Girija Tickoo was killed by Islamists in collusion with her own colleagues, why local mosques blared slogans of ‘Raliv, Tsaliv, ya Galiv” (convert, flee or die), and why the local Muslims participated in the hounding and killing of Kashmiri Hindus.

The reality is that Islamists had taken over the valley even before Governor Jagmohan reached Srinagar. The targeted killings of Kashmiri Hindus had been going on in pockets before that fateful night in January 1990 and even had continued long after that.

Sharad Pawar had concocted an ‘imaginary’ bomb blast to shield Islamists in 1993

Sharad Pawar’s style of secularism is rather peculiar. In 1993, when Mumbai, (then Bombay) was attacked by a series of deadly bomb blasts, Sharad Pawar was the CM of Maharashtra. Speaking to the media, Pawar had admitted that since all the blasts had occurred in Hindu majority areas, he had concocted an extra bomb blast, which never happened, at the Muslim majority area of Masjid Bandar in Mumbai.

Pawar had added that the reason behind his false claim was that he did not want people to think that only Hindus are being targeted. Speaking to NDTV, he had also added that he had deliberately misled people by saying that he had examined the material at the bomb blast sites, and had stated that the material is used by insurgent elements in South India.

Pawar had even boasted that he was ‘praised’ by the Justice Srikrishna Commission for this crafty lie.

Daleep Singh, Joe Biden’s economic advisor, threatens India during his trip: Here is how S Jaishankar called out the West’s hypocrisy

On Thursday (March 31), Deputy National Security Adviser for International Economics of the Biden administration, Daleep Singh, courted controversy after he threatened India with ‘consequences’ for purchasing oil from Russia and setting up an alternate payment mechanism to circumvent US sanctions.

“I come here in a spirit of friendship to explain the mechanisms of our sanctions, the importance of joining us, to express a shared resolve and to advance shared interests. And yes, there are consequences to countries that actively attempt to circumvent or backfill the sanctions,” he had remarked.

Singh further warned, “We are very keen for all countries, especially our allies and partners, not to create mechanisms that prop up the (Russian) rouble, and those that attempt to undermine the dollar-based financial system.”

The Biden administration official, who is on a State visit to India, made the contentious remarks in New Delhi while speaking to the media. Daleep Singh had claimed that Russia would not come to India’s rescue if China was to continue its misadventure along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).

“Russia is going to be the junior partner in this relationship with China. And the more leverage that China gains over Russia, the less favourable that is for India, I don’t think anyone would believe that if China once again breached the Line of Actual Control, that Russia will come running to India’s defence,” he said.

Singh had also warned India to reduce its ‘dependence’ on Russia for its defence and energy requirements. “What we would not like to see is a rapid acceleration of India’s imports from Russia as it relates to energy or any other any other exports that are currently being prohibited by us or by other aspects of the international sanctions regime,” he cautioned.

Intimidatory comments by Daleep Singh draw ire

His threats, aimed at coercing India into submitting to the Western diktat, did not go down well with the Indians. Former diplomat Syed Akbaruddin slammed the US Deputy National Security Adviser for International Economics for not adhering to the language of diplomacy.

He had tweeted, “So this is our friend…This is not the language of diplomacy…This is the language of coercion…Somebody tell this young man that punitive unilateral economic measures are a breach of customary international law.”

Journalist Stanly Johnny had pointed out, “India is not a client state of any great power. It’s not part of any alliance system. The world’s 2nd most populous country & the 7th largest economy, it’d not like to be told in public what it should do and what it shouldn’t. Daleep Singh missed this vital point in Delhi.”

Author Zorawar Daulet Singh slammed Daleep Singh and tweeted, “This Daleep chap is confused. This bravado only works with client states.”

S Jaishankar lambasts Western countries over its glaring hypocrisy on Russian oil imports

While speaking at the India-Uk Strategic Futures Forum, India’s Minister for External Affairs (EAM) S Jaishankar pointed out that European countries were the biggest importers of Russian gas and oil.

While defending the decision to purchase Russian crude oil at discounted prices, the EAM emphasised that it was important for India to obtain good deals on energy supplies, at a time when global markets were volatile.

“It is interesting because we have seen for some time what looks almost like a campaign (against us) on this issue. When the oil prices go up, I think it is natural for the countries to go out into the market and look for what are good deals for their people,” he had remarked.

During a conversation with British Foreign Secretary of State Liz Truss, S Jaishankar emphasised that India purchased its majority of energy supplies from the Middle East. He pointed out that around 8% of the total oil imports were from the United States while less than 1% of crude oil purchases were from Russia.

While hitting back at the likes of Daleep Singh, he said that the largest buyers of Russian oil and gas were from Europe. He had added, “I am pretty sure if we wait two or three months and actually look at who are the big buyers of Russian oil and gas, I suspect the list would not be too different from what it used to be and I suspect we won’t be in the top 10 on that list.

While defending the United Kingdom after EAM exposed the country’s glaring hypocrisy, Liz Truss claimed that the country will end its dependence on Russian energy supplies by the end of this year. She conceded that UK did not ‘do enough’ during the Russian invasion of Crimea in 2014.

“We did not do enough when [Russian President Vladimir] Putin invaded Crimea. We did not do enough to involve ourselves in the Minsk agreements and we are now seeing the results of that,” she said. Truss added that it was important to keep Russian oil purchases in check to prevent ‘funding’ its war machinery.

“I think the biggest danger at the moment is that we let off the gas on sanctions. We cannot do that. We need to continue to put pressure on Putin and continue to supply weapons into Ukraine,” she continued.

After S Jaishankar made India’s position clear to his UK counterpart, Truss said that India is a sovereign country and free to decide on its matters. “I think it is very important that we respect other countries’ decisions about the issues they face. India is a sovereign nation. I am not going to tell India what to do..“

Recently, India has purchased the S-400 missile system from Russia using the alternative payment system of rupee-ruble. The country is also eyeing to resolve payment issues relating to import-export with Russia, caused due to US sanctions.

Since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine war on February 24 this year, the country has purchased an additional 13 million barrels of Russian oil. This is in comparison to a total of 16 million barrels of Russian oil purchased by India in all of 2021.

Congress membership drive extended by 15 days because ‘it did not gather pace’ in many states: Details

Congress membership drive, which started on the 1st of November 2021, has been extended by 15 days after state units fell behind on their enrolment targets. According to reports, the membership drive has been extended till 15th April 2022. Reportedly, Sonia Gandhi gave her consent to extend the drive after several General Secretaries and the party in-charges sought more time to finish the process since the process had not “gathered pace”.

The emphasis of the membership drive has been to get as many people to sign up for the Congress digitally, to help the party overcome electoral challenges that it faces on a regular basis.

KC Venugopal tweeted that the extension of the membership drive would not affect the organisational elections meant to be held, as decided by the CWC.

Keeping in tune with the “Sonia Gandhi is unhappy” template, media reported that according to their sources, Sonia Gandhi was not happy with the way the membership drive had been conducted, however, she had categorically stated that postponing the organisational elections would send a wrong signal.

The demand to extend the membership drive comes as enrolments did not meet Congress targets in several states. Interestingly, the state of Kerala was one of the states asking for an extension on the drive. The drive did not pick up much pace in other states like Uttar Pradesh, Manipur, Goa, Uttarakhand and Punjab due to the assembly elections. Given that Congress lost spectacularly in all 5 states, it comes as no surprise that the membership drive did not take off and pick pace in these states.

According to media sources, Telangana performed the best by adding 39 lakh members since November while Delhi added 2.5 members. The target for Congress Delhi was 10 lakhs.

Reports indicate that while Assam Congress had set their target as 33 lakhs, they have only been able to achieve only 50% of their target. Congress “insiders” being quoted by the media are claiming that it is likely that Congress in Assam won’t be able to achieve even their previous membership number of 24 lakh.

When contacted, Assam PCC president Bhupen Borah admitted that there indeed has been a shortfall. Sources have also indicated that after losing the 2021 elections, several old members (who are still members) have been dormant and not too many new people wish to join Congress, therefore, meeting the target could be difficult.

Given that these numbers have probably been provided by Congress sources to the media, the authenticity of these numbers cannot be trusted completely.

Ahead of the no-confidence motion, Pakistan PM Imran Khan claims the USA wants to ‘topple’ his govt, White House hits out

Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan, who is fighting to stay in power ahead of the no-confidence motion in the National Assembly, has claimed that a ‘foreign’ nation is involved in toppling his government.

In a live televised address to the nation on Thursday, Imran Khan claimed that the United States “threatened” him and added that the US is seeking his removal as he faces a no-confidence vote next week.

Khan had claimed at a rally he had a letter that showed a foreign country was conspiring against him and his political opponents working at its behest. He had claimed that a “foreign conspiracy letter” was accessed by senior journalists and cabinet members, which as per Khan, was authentic. He claimed the Opposition’s no-confidence motion against him as a testimony of a “foreign-funded” move to topple his government.

Last week, speaking at another event, Imran Khan had also claimed the united opposition had joined the west, especially the US, to remove him from power through a no-confidence vote. He had referred to PML-N President Shahbaz Sharif, Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman, and Pakistan People’s Party Co-chairman Asif Ali Zardari as “three stooges”.

Reportedly, the ‘foreign-conspiracy’ letter was sent to the Pakistani Ambassador to the United States of America, Asad Mujeed, based on his meeting with the Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs, Donald Lu.

Senior Pakistani diplomats have said that the letter could be the diplomatic cable from Washington. “The contents of the letter, apparently, are based on informal discussions between Pakistani and other officials,” a Pakistani diplomat was quoted as saying.

Abdul Basit, a former diplomat, said that the so-called threatening letter was a diplomatic assessment from Pakistan’s US ambassador and not a threat from the US government.

“The contents, if correct, show a set of friendly officials from various countries indulging in some loud-thinking and probing. Nothing more. The purpose behind such cables is to keep your government informed. It’s no sign of a conspiracy against a government or a personality,” another diplomatic source was quoted as saying.

US rejects Imran Khan’s allegations, says no letter sent

Following the allegations by Imran Khan, the US government has categorically rejected any involvement in the vote of no-confidence and said Pakistan PM’s allegations as baseless.

On Wednesday, the United States denied reports of any specific message being delivered to Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States and said that no US government agency had sent a letter to Pakistan on the current political situation in the country.

“There is no truth to these allegations,” said the US State Department spokesperson responding to the question regarding the alleged ‘letter’.

Imran Khan’s speech had come at a time when he has virtually lost the majority in the 342-member National Assembly after the defection of two key allies. Although the Pakistani parliament is adjourned till Sunday without debate on the no-trust motion, observers believe that the path ahead for Khan might be grim, and he may soon be deposed from the office.

The PTI-led coalition government was formed with the support of 179 members, but with MQM-P withdrawing, Imran Khan’s party is left with 164 members in support. The united opposition has now 177 supporters in the national assembly, and they do not need the support of PTI lawmakers.

‘No Muslims from Bareilly support BJP’: Anti-triple talaq activist Nida Khan threatened with death for not quitting BJP, husband, family booked

On March 31, Thursday, the Uttar Pradesh police booked six people for issuing death threats to the Bareilly triple talaq victim Nida Khan. Those booked include her husband Sheeran Raza Khan, who had ‘divorced’ her through instant triple talaq, and other family members.

According to reports, Khan claimed that her husband and his family members had threatened her with death if she did not quit the BJP.

Nida Khan, the triple talaq crusader, is a member of the minority cell of the Bhartiya Janata Party. She had campaigned for the BJP in the recently-held Uttar Pradesh Assembly polls.

ANI quoted Nida Khan as saying, “During a family wedding, my relatives coerced me to renounce BJP. I was surrounded by a crowd & got minor injuries. They said no Muslims from Bareilly support BJP as it’s a non-Muslim party but you have campaigned for it which is non-muslim. I’ve filed an FIR.”

Speaking about the case, SSP Bareilly Rohit Singh Sajwan told the news agency that “Nida Khan filed a complaint against her relatives, alleging that they threatening her with a social boycott because she joined a specific party. A case has been filed against 6 people and an investigation is underway”.

According to police, all the six accused have been booked under IPC sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 506 (criminal intimidation) along with relevant sections of the IT act.

Notably, Nida Khan is the daughter-in-law of the deceased brother of hate-monger Islamic cleric Tauqeer Raza Khan of the famous Ala Hazrat family, whom the Congress brought into the party folds in January 2022.

Nida Khan criticises the Congress and Tauqeer Raza Khan for masquerading as crusaders for women’s rights

Merely two days after Tauqeer Raza Khan’s induction, Nida Khan has gone on to slam the Congress party for masquerading as crusaders for women’s rights. She had chastised the head of the Ittihad-e-Millat Council for his hypocrisy on the issue of women’s rights. Speaking to the media, Nida Khan, the triple talaq crusader, called Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s election campaign- ‘Ladki hoon, Lad Sakti hoon’ a political gimmick. Slamming Tauqeer Raza Khan for his duplicity and trickery, Nida Khan said that her ex-husband’s uncle has been openly extending support to Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s ‘Ladki hoon, Lad Sakti hoon’ campaign but in reality, he has no respect for women.

Nida Khan describes the BJP as the real fighter for women’s rights

Nida Khan had, instead, described BJP as the only political party that has truly fought for women’s rights. She praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi led government for empathising with Muslim women in India and banning triple talaq.

Nida Khan had grabbed headlines when she went to the Supreme Court to challenge the triple talaq given by her husband. She had started a crusade against the evil practices like triple talaq and Nikah halala. Nida Khan, sharing her story said that she was forced to sleep, consummate the marriage with her father-in-law and brother-in-law, under the Islamic practice of ‘Nikah Halala’, so that her husband could marry her again.

Muslim clerics issue fatwa to stone Nida

In 2018, after the Bareilly court had declared the instant triple talaq given to Nida Khan by her husband Sheeran is invalid, a group of Muslim clerics, All India Faizan-e-Madina Council from Bareilly had reportedly issued a fresh fatwa against her and another activist Farhat Naqvi. The clerics had also announced a cash reward of Rs. 11,876 for anybody who chops her hair. She had also said that a fatwa had been issued that if she doesn’t leave the country within 3 days, she will be attacked with stones.

Pakistan PM Imran Khan mentions Indian ‘journalist’ Barkha Dutt in his address ahead of No-Trust Vote: Read what he said

After being reduced to a minority in the Pakistan assembly and struggling to remain in power, PM Imran Khan cited Indian ‘journalist’ Barkha Dutt in his address to the nation, which is touted by many as his farewell speech ahead of the No-Trust Vote.

Citing Barkha Dutt’s book, the embattled Pakistani Prime Minister stated that former PM Nawaz Sharif used to surreptitiously meet PM Modi in Nepal to save himself from the Pakistani Army.

“It is mentioned in Barkha Dutt’s book that he(Nawaz Sharif) used to have secret meetings with Narendra Modi in Nepal to protect himself from his own army,” Khan said.

Besides, Khan also asserted that there was a foreign conspiracy in motion working to topple his government. He further alleged that there were enemies inside the country who were cooperating with “foreign conspirators” to bring his government down.

Hitting out at the United States, Imran Khan said that a threatening letter has revealed that if he continues to remain in power in Pakistan then the country will have to face tough times and its relations with the United States will deteriorate.

He further added that if somehow he no longer remains in power, then nothing will happen, and Pakistan’s relations with the US will not be affected.

Khan’s speech came at a time when he has virtually lost the majority in the 342-member National Assembly after the defection of two key allies. Although the Pakistani parliament is adjourned till Sunday without debate on the no-trust motion, observers believe that the path ahead for Khan might be grim and he may soon be deposed from the office.

Hafiz Saeed, chief of Pak-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, heaps praises on Barkha Dutt

It is noteworthy to mention that Barkha’s fan following in India’s arch-enemy, Pakistan, is not just limited to Imran Khan alone. Earlier, Hafiz Saeed, the chief of terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba, had lavished praises on Barkha Dutt in an interview he had given to a Pakistani channel in 2016.

When questioned about media narratives and allegations levelled against him by India about promoting terrorism in Kashmir, Saeed said there were journalists like Barkha Dutt, who according to him, made sense.

India main Barkha Dutt jaisey log bhee maujood hain bohot acchey baat karneywaley bhee maujood hain (In India good journalists like Barkha Dutt are also present and there are many who make sense)” Saeed had said then.

Supreme Court directs former Rajya Sabha MP Sharad Yadav to vacate government bungalow by May 31

0

On March 31, the Supreme Court bench led by Justice DY Chandrachud, Justice Surya Kant and Justice Sanjeev Khanna directed Rajya Sabha MP and RJD leader Sharad Yadav to vacate government accommodation by May 31, 2022. Notably, Yadav has been directed to file an unconditional undertaking in the matter, and if he failed to do so, the extension would not be provided.

Yadav was directed by the Delhi High Court on March 15, 2022, to vacate the accommodation at 7 Tughlaq Road by March 31, 2022. He had filed a plea in Supreme Court against the judgement.

The Supreme Court made it clear in the order that they were giving an extension only because Yadav was unwell and had to undergo dialysis every week. Appearing for Yadav, Congress leader and senior advocate Kapil Sibal had informed the court that Yadav had been on the ventilator for 22 days and asked for more time to vacate the bungalow.

The court had earlier directed Additional Solicitor General (ASG), Sanjay Jain, to take instructions in the matter. ASG informed the court that a month extension could be provided to Yadav. He said the extension had been provided on humanitarian grounds. Sibal argued that a month’s time would not be sufficient considering his health condition. The court noted Sibal submitted that if reasonable time was given to Yadav, he would vacate the premises.

The court said in the order, “having heard the Ld. Counsels, on humanitarian grounds, the petitioner is granted time till May 31 to vacate the premises. He is to file an unconditional undertaking stating the same. If the undertaking is not given, he will not have the benefit of the order.”

Four years since he was disqualified from Rajya Sabha

On March 15, in its order, Delhi High Court said that it had been four years since Sharad Yadav was disqualified from Rajya Sabha. The double bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Navin Chawla directed the former MP to vacate the bungalow in 15 days. Notably, an interim order was passed by a single judge bench in 2017 in which he was allowed to use official perks and facilities of MP till the petition was decided. In 2018, the apex court modified the order and allowed him only to use the accommodation but stripped him from his salary and other benefits.

Disqualification of Sharad Yadav

In 2017, Sharad Yadav was disqualified from Rajya Sabha by chairman Venkaiah Naidu based on the petition filed by JD(U). In the petition, the party had sought his disqualification on the basis of the accusations that he was taking part in anti-party activities. Yadav formed a party, Loktantrik Janata Dal, after leaving JD(U) formally in 2018. Later, his party was merged with Lalu Prasad Yadav’s Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD).