Home Blog Page 6613

Mehbooba Mufti tries to rationalise Pulwama terrorist attack, blames government for ‘muscular approach’

The father of Adil Ahmad Dar, the Jaish-e-Mohammad terrorist who carried out the ghastly Pulwama attack on CRPF personnel, is again in the news for trying to justify his son’s evil deed of murdering the CRPF soldiers. The Pulwama terrorist’s father defended his son’s act by asserting that this is the ‘struggle for freedom’.


From claiming that he had no idea about his son’s whereabouts to acknowledging that he had joined the terror ranks, the slain terrorist’s father has now resorted to rationalise his son deeds, exonerating him of any culpability by trying to contextualise his son’s gruesome act of killing 40 soldiers. He has also expressed a ‘sorry’ for the relatives of those killed, but in the same breath, claims that he also ‘understands’ what his son did.

In an interview to The Independent, Gulam Dar also says he is proud of his son. He adds that he is proud in the sense that whatever he did in joining terrorism, he did it for his people.

Speaking to Indian media right after the Pulwama attck, Ghulam Dar had stated that he had no idea that his son was involved in terrorist activities. But immediately later, Gulam Dar and his wife had stated to Reuters that their son Adil was ‘angry’ after being insulted and beaten by Indian soldiers and had turned towards terrorist activities.

Right after his son blew himself up, a video was released by the Pakistan based terrorist group Jaish-e-Muhammad in which the terrorist was seen calling for Jihad against ‘non-believers’ and ‘cow piss drinkers’. The hatred for Hindus in the video was too pronounced to be ignored. Perhaps, his father ‘understands’ and ‘legitimises’ this hatred against Hindus for which his son laid down his life and killed 40 CRPF personnel.

However, the whitewashing and rationalisation are not limited to the parents of the terrorist alone.


The former Chief Minister of the Jammu and Kashmir, Mehbooba Mufti, who was until recently a part of an alliance with the BJP government has also attempted to justify the horrible atrocity committed by terrorist Ahmad Dar and pinned the blame on the government for its ‘muscular approach’ responsible for gullible youths in the Valley to take up arms.

Mehbooba Mufti has long been an apologist for terrorists and stone pelters in the valley. She also bats for Kashmiri separatists. On the issue of the government detaining Jamat-e-Islami and other separatist leaders, she had opposed the government too.

Recently, speaking on the issue of article 35A, she had stated that if the central government tries to tamper with the article 35A, they will be playing with fire and claimed that the people of Kashmir might abandon the Indian tricolor and pick up a different flag.

‘Go Back Nikhil’ campaign mocking nepotism in JDS irks Karnataka CM Kumaraswamy, directs investigation

The Chief Minister of Karnataka, HD Kumaraswamy seems to be continuing the traditions of nurturing dynastic politics just like his father, former Prime Minister HD Devegowda once did. However, Chief Minister Kumaraswamy seems to have hit a wrong note after he reportedly ordered police officials to identify social media users who expressed dissent on social media over his son Nikhil Kumaraswamy’s candidacy from Mandya, reports TV9.

According to local media reports, Chief Minister Kumaraswamy may have issued gag orders to the state police officers and intelligence officers to not only stop people trending ‘Go back Nikhil’ on social media but also to find these social media users who have been expressing their dissent over JDS ‘parachuting’ Nikhil Kumaraswamy, who is all set to be made the JDS-Congress joint candidate from Mandya in the upcoming Lok Sabha elections.

There has been a growing resentment within JDS party over Nikhil Kumaraswamy’s candidacy from Mandya constituency and was reflected with many social media users trending ‘Go Back Nikhil’ while alleging that JDS only meant ‘Just Devegowda and Sons’. As people across the state expressed their opposition to Nikhil Gowda, who had a disastrous acting career and no experience in politics, his father CM Kumaraswamy seems to be angered and has reportedly issued gag orders to find out the people behind these social media trends.

Several posters have gone viral on social media, accusing Janata Dal-Secular of indulging in dynastic politics. One poster openly mocked the Gowda family for its ‘family politics’ saying, ‘If Gowda were to be the captain of the Indian cricket team, the team would be filled with Gowda family members.’

Another poster said that JDS has a ‘Ticket Bhagya Yojana’ in which only family members belong to HD Devegowda were eligible to contest. Similarly, another poster compared Sumalatha to Seetha while referring Revanna as ‘Ravana’.

Irked by the fact that his son has no acceptance among the masses of Mandya, according to a TV9 report, HD Kumaraswamy has ordered to the state intelligence officers to dox social media users and provide details whether they belong to JDS or other political parties.

The trending of ‘Go Back Nikhil’ comes at the backdrop of another senior leader of JDS, HD Revanna resorting to crass remarks against actor-turned-politician Sumalatha over her widowhood, which has resulted in a severe backlash against HD Kumaraswamy and JDS.

HD Revanna, another son of JDS supremo HD Devegowda had questioned Sumalatha’s intent to contest polls just after her husband veteran actor MH Ambareesh’s death. Sumalatha, who is set to contest against Nikhil Kumaraswamy, the son of Chief Minister Kumaraswamy from Mandya- the fortress of JDS, has pushed the party on the back foot leading to HD Revanna making such derogatory statements.

Mandya Lok Sabha constituency is going to be one of the most crucial battles of 2019 Lok Sabha elections, as Sumalatha is challenging JDS in its own fortress. Sumalatha, who has decided to contest from Mandya in the upcoming general elections, enjoys a very good connection with the voters, which has worried the JDS.

No, wearing military caps in solidarity with the armed forces is not ‘jingoism’

During the third ODI against Australia, the Indian team wore military camouflage caps in solidarity with Central Reserved Police Forces and their families who suffered in the cowardly Pulwama attack. After the match, one headline that caught my attention was “Indian team wearing Military Cap is a dangerous sign.” I went through the article and then saluted the writer for writing utter crap and still getting paid for it.

The article mentions that it was not necessary to wear military caps to publicize charity and then the article compares wearing of the military cap with outward military jingoism. Calling this gesture military jingoism is a joke but by doing so the writer himself has definitely taken an extreme route in writing called hyperbole.

Wearing military cap was a gesture to show that Indian cricket team stands with the CRPF and their families in this moment of grief. It was not to publicize their act of donation rather it was an act to inspire all the Indians to contribute to the National Defence Fund. There are two things that are loved and admired across India i.e. Indian Cricket Team and Indian Armed Forces. So I am not surprised that the Indian Cricket Team which is a microcosm of India is standing by Indian Armed Forces at this juncture. A gesture like this inspires people to stand for their country and gives heartburn to people loaded with the bias against India and Indian-ness.

The article doesn’t stop at comparing the gesture with military jingoism. It goes on and compares it with ‘creepy nationalism’. A gesture to support people suffered in a coward terrorist attack would never sound creep to anyone except to those who are insane.

The article then makes a sweeping statement that never before has Indian Team worn such jingoism on their head. Maybe the writer has his head down in the sand when the God of Indian Cricket Team, Sachin Tendulkar used to play. The tricolour was proudly displayed on his helmet when he came out to bat for India.

Then the article questions why the Indian team hasn’t so far given their hard earned money for education or some collective causes. I laugh at such statements and wonder who gives the writer the authority to decide in which field a player or team should do the charity. However, I think the writer may be suffering from “Ghajini syndrome” since he forgot that Indian Cricket Team recently contributed the entire test match fee for Kerala Flood Victims. They also played charity football match for unprivileged kids and cancer victims. They individually support different causes such as Animal welfare, Swachh Bharat Mission, Women Empowerment etc but then it seems that writer’s main aim is to demonize nationalism as he connects this gesture with the current political scenario and election.

The article hails the time when Indian Hockey Team refused to give “Heil Hitler” salute in 1936 Olympics which was supposed to be a symbolic act against fascism but demonizes this gesture of Indian Cricket Team of standing with the CRPF and against terrorism. However, I am not surprised with this as there are people in our country who shout anti-national slogans of “Bharat tere tukde honge” with impunity and a particular group of people in media portray this as Freedom of Expression. So no wonder if someone finds the gesture of solidarity with India Armed Forces, which protects and unites India, as threatening. Yes, it threatens their ecosystem for sure.

The article further mentions that no team in the history of modern cricket has worn military camouflage caps or symbols during an international match to make a statement. It’s a lie and peddling lies is what most of the liberal group of people in media do to earn their bread and butter. A simple Google search will show you that in the Southampton test of 2014 match where English cricketer Moeen Ali sported ‘Save Gaza’ and ‘Free Palestine’ wrist band, the home team had “Help for Heroes” logo on their collars, drawing attention to crippled or disabled servicemen but then the liberals of our world doesn’t have a problem with those gestures for obvious reasons.

When Dhoni and Kohli wore the military caps they represented each one of us, our feelings and the fire that has been enlightened in our hearts.

However, there is a concerted effort from the so-called liberal group of media to undermine rising nationalism. They fear getting exposed in the wave of nationalism so their sole purpose is to make people feel guilty about being a nationalist. This propaganda is quite evident. These people will support “Afzal hum sharminda” kind of slogans but will go berserk with the slogan of “Bharat Mata ki jai”. This same group will support stone-pelters but will be up in arms when an officer of Indian Army ties a stone-pelter in his jeep to save his troops. The same group will have an objection when someone asks to stand for National Anthem. These people will not miss a chance to mock everything which is even remotely related to rising Nationalism be it a movie dialogue “How is the Josh” or the salutation “Jai Hind”. When nothing works these scoundrels will throw a famous quote at you –

“Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel”

For these people, I have only one thing to say

“Your time is up, India is awoken from the slumber”.

जो भरा नहीं है भावों से जिसमें बहती रसधार नहीं।
वह हृदय नहीं है पत्थर है, जिसमें स्वदेश काप्यार नहीं

West Bengal: 1000 kg of explosives seized from vehicle in Kolkata

A team of Special Task Force (STF) of Kolkata police has intercepted a vehicle loaded with 1000 kg of explosive material earlier today. As per reports, two persons have been arrested.


 Reports say that a commercial vehicle (TATA 407) coming from Odisha was intercepted by the STF at the Tala Bridge in Chitpur area. The vehicle had 27 gunny bags loaded. Upon inspection, it was found that the gunny bags contained approximately 1000 kg of Potassium nitrate, used for making explosives.

The vehicle had reportedly started from Balasore in Odisha and was going towards Bengal’s North 24 Parganas district.

Two persons, Indrajit Bhui (25) and Padmalochan Dey(31), the drive and the helper of the vehicle, both residents of Odisha, have been arrested by the police team. While Bhui hails from the Malek village in Basta block of Balasore, Odisha, Dey is from the Mithani village.

The police team had reportedly acted on prior information and intercepted the vehicle in North Kolkata. The police have begun an investigation over the intended use of the explosives. A case under sections 4 and 5 of the explosive substance act has been registered.

‘Modi is our daddy, he is India’s daddy,’ AIADMK minister K T Rajendra Balaji on the alliance with BJP

Tamil Nadu Minister K T Rajendra Balaji while accepting Prime Minister Modi’s leadership said, “In today’s context due to the absence of Amma (J Jayalalitha), Modi is our daddy. He is India’s daddy. So we have accepted his leadership.”


He said that that in absence of Jayalalitha, PM Modi has been their guiding light. “Modi is our daddy now. Since we have lost our Amma, PM Modi has come as a daddy to guide and support us,” he said.

As the 2019 General elections come nearer, the buzz around the alliance between BJP and AIADMK have started gaining momentum, after both its leaders are holding meetings and discussions on the issue. The state has 39 Lok Sabha seats and currently has an AIADMK government, with DMK in opposition.

Uttar Pradesh: After Moradabad, posters urging Robert Vadra to contest elections come up in Ghaziabad

Days after Congress General Secretary Priyanka Vadra’s husband Robert Vadra had hinted at joining politics, posters urging him to contest from Ghaziabad in Uttar Pradesh have come up. The posters which were put up by Ghaziabad youth congress near Kaushambi metro station read: “Ghaziabad kare pukaar, Robert Vadra abki baar,” roughly translated as “Ghaziabad urges Robert Vadra to contest elections from Ghaziabad constituency”.

Earlier, similar posters had emerged in Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, which requested him to contest elections from Moradabad Lok Sabha constituency. ‘Robert Vadra ji you are welcome to contest elections from Moradabad Lok Sabha constituency’ were seen in Moradabad.

Almost a month after his wife Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, who is also the sister of Congress President, Rahul Gandhi, had been roped in as the Congress General Secretary in UP (East), Robert Vadra, who is facing probes in land deal irregularities had hinted that he could also be taking the plunge this election season.

In a loaded facebook post, Vadra wrote, “The years n months that I spent campaigning n working in different parts of the country, but mainly in UP, gave me a feeling to do more for the people n make smaller changes possible by me, in their areas n when they got to know me, the genuine love, affection n respect I earned was humbling …All these years of experience n learning cannot be just wasted and should be put to better use… once all these accusations n allegations are over, I feel I should dedicate a larger role in serving the people”.

He had also hinted that if and when he chooses to contest he might do it from Moradabad. “I was born in Moradabad and have spent childhood in Uttar Pradesh and I think I understand that area. However, I can stay anywhere and I believe I will be able to understand them.”

However, on March 6 while speaking to ANI Vadra vowed not to join politics until his name is cleared in the money laundering cases.

Robert Vadra is accused of money laundering case and dubious land deal cases. He was recently summoned by the Enforcement Directorate in connection with these cases. He had applied for anticipatory bail in the court earlier last month after a fresh money laundering case was filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The case filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) against Skylight Hospitality firm owned by Vadra. The case is in relation to alleged financial irregularities in land deals in Gurgaon, Haryana in 2008. The ED had recently attached Vadra’s properties worth Rs 4.62 crores in the Bikaner land scam case.

Pakistan indulges in heavy shelling in ceasefire violation along the LoC once again

Pakistan, while issuing grand statements of peace talks with India, is playing its usual self along the border by indulging in continuous unprovoked ceasefire violations. Pakistan has again violated ceasefire along the LoC in Shahpur and Kerni sectors of Poonch district by resorting to heavy shelling with artillery and firing of small arms.


The ceasefire violations took place around 6 pm yesterday which were retaliated by the Indian Army. Pakistan has hardly missed a day without indulging in repetitive ceasefire violations ever since the Indian Air Force conducted air strikes in Balakot targeting the training camps of Pakistan based terrorist organisation Jaish-e-Mohammad.

Until July in the last year alone, Pakistan had carried out the highest number of ceasefire violations in the past eight years counting more 1432 times. Hardly a week of this month has passed and Pakistan has already indulged in several reported instances of ceasefire violations along the Line of Control.

On March 6, the Indian army had issued a stern warning to Pakistan over the incessant attempts to target civilian and military posts. A statement by the army had stated that any further misadventure by Pakistan will be responded in a befitting manner with dire consequences.

On one hand Pakistan is playing the claims of taking action against terrorist organisations on its soil in the aftermath of Pulwama terrorist attack due to international pressure but on the other hand, it has been targetting Indian civilians and military installations near the LoC.

Invasion of the Sacred: If you embarrass your family on social media for being pro-Modi, you could be featured in next TOI story

Gaurav Sabnis, a not very ’eminent’ liberal ‘intellectual’, recently shared on Twitter the effect politics has had on his familial relationships. He expressed his anguish at being boycotted by his extended family for saying ‘mean things’ about Prime Minister Modi in the family WhatsApp group.


Considering Sabnis is someone who chooses to embarrass his family on social media to score liberal brownie points on Twitter, one is likely to think there are other significant reasons behind his extended family’s decision to boycott him.

Meanwhile, A Times of India journalist has tweeted in response to one of the replies expressing her desire to discuss the matter further with the person, presumably, for a story on the matter.


That mainstream media journalists have fallen to reporting on personal squabbles within families, which have an obvious political slant, speaks volumes of the agenda that they try to peddle.

The series of events that led to this says something about the dystopian nature of modernity. It’s hard to think of a time in the past when it was regarded as socially acceptable to shame one’s family in public to score brownie points in one’s political circles. Since the advent of liberalism, however, it has become an unfortunate reality.

The mainstream media, on its part, provides incentives to people to embarrass their family by lionizing them and portraying them as some sort of heroes in liberal circles for standing up to ‘fascism’. The normalization of such despicable behaviour and even lionizing those who participate in it is one of the many ways in which the mainstream media fuels divisions within the country.

As a matter of fact, proving one’s commitment to the preferred political ideology by denouncing one’s family or near and dear ones publicly is one of the most significant contributions of liberalism to politics. In the liberal world, blood may be thicker than water but loyalty to political ideology transcends them all.

In a sane world, people would sort out their differences with others in the family by having a rational discussion on the matters of import. But in the clown world of liberalism we live in, people use these differences to augment their position within their political circles and use their family as tools for grandstanding.

To complete the circle of comedy, journalists run helter-skelter to publish testimonials on such people and lament how a certain politician is causing family members to abandon each other. Of course, the problem is not with the politician. The actual problem, of course, is with people who advertise their familial squabbles on social media for political objectives and those who rely on such people to peddle their political agenda through their media outlets.

To be fair to the TOI journalist, she was only showing the new tricks she has learnt from her Western counterparts. Blaming politicians for ‘tearing’ families apart is something that began with President Trump in the United States. Progressives spun yearns on how their relationships with their families have deteriorated after Donald Trump rose to prominence.

Liberals have written at great length how Donald Trump has played a role in the degradation of their relationship with their parents.

Some have even blamed him for their marriages falling apart.

Considering the track record of the Indian mainstream media, it is fair to assume that this is exactly what the TOI journalist was attempting to do. The motive was to paint Prime Minister Modi as a divisive figure who is causing fissures within families. The objective appears to have been to absolve Gaurav Sabnis and others like him who shame their own family members in public of their sins and put the blame squarely on the shoulders of Narendra Modi, even though helping people maintain peace within the family is not the job of a Prime Minister.

The invasion of the sacred is one of the intrinsic principles of Liberalism. After invading our religious spaces, it was only a matter of time before an attempt was to invade the sacred space of familial relationships. As I have mentioned earlier, liberalism demands its adherents put their political loyalties before familial bonds. It’s only one of the many reasons why liberalism is antithetical to a cohesive society.

Supreme Court has taken a surprising stand: RSS on SC’s decision to send Ram Mandir issue to mediation

On Thursday, the Supreme Court of India sent the Ayodhya’s Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid dispute to mediation, which is set to begin within 4 weeks and end in 8 weeks. The SC’s decision has drawn a sharp reaction from Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, which has labeled its stand as “surprising”.


A report on the three-day annual meeting of the Akhil Bharatiya Pratinidhi Sabha (ABPS), RSS’s top-policy formation body, said:

“In Ram-Janmabhoomi case, instead of accelerating the judicial process to end the long-drawn dispute, the Supreme Court has taken a surprising stand,” the report further read that SC’s inability to find priority in the sensitive subject associated with Hindu faith is “beyond understanding”.


It also added that the Hindu community is constantly getting neglected. While showing full respect in the judicial system, RSS hoped that Judgment on the dispute gets expedited and obstacles stand removed to pave way for the construction of Ram Mandir.

At the convention, which is going on in Gwalior, various issues related to Hindu cause will be discussed. At the meeting, a resolution condemning the Kerela government for forceful implementation of the SC’s Sabarimala order will also be passed.

Over 1400 RSS functionaries across the country will attend the meeting. BJP president Amit Shah is scheduled to attend too.

“The Sabarimala Temple issue is related to age-old dharmic traditions. The Kerala government is committing excesses against Hindu devotees in the garb of implementing the Supreme Court’s decision.” Manmohan Vaidya, joint general secretary of RSS, was quoted.

The Hindu and Indian Express are livid about Sri Sri Ravi Shankar being included in Ayodhya mediation process

There is a massive heart-burning in The Hindu and Indian Express today on the appointment of spiritual leader Sri Sri Ravi Shankar by Supreme Court as one of the mediators in the long-simmering Ayodhya dispute.

Word almost similar against Sri Sri Ravishankar’s have appeared in the Wire (through its editor Sidharth Bhatia), the Quint and the Scroll—how commie rags work in perfect unison!– and of course the National Herald. But I would concern myself with the big bosses—The Hindu and Indian Express, rather than the sidekicks on the matter.

The Hindu, in an edit piece, writes: “The inclusion of Sri Sri Ravi Shankar as one of the mediators is controversial. In the past, he has made remarks to the effect that Muslims ought to give up their claims and that the failure to find a negotiated settlement will result in “civil war.”

The Indian Express, through this comment on its editorial page, questions “the choice of mediators, particularly Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, who is on record asking Muslims to give up their claim as a goodwill gesture and had even doubted the highest court’s competence in adjudicating the matter. In fact, he said in explicit terms that if the Supreme Court decided this matter, the losing party will have no option but to turn to extremism..”

First of all, readers, especially if you spend your morning with The Hindu, please ask your newspaper to provide the evidence that Sri Sri Ravi Shankar did the scare-mongering of “civil war” on Ayodhya. You would have the first proof of the credibility of your incredible newspaper. Then you question them if Sri Sri was really wishing a bad deal for Muslims when he wrote to All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB): “An out-of-court settlement in which the Muslim bodies come forward and gift one acre of land to the Hindus who in turn will gift five acres of land nearby to the Muslims to build a better mosque.” (one acre to Hindus and five acres to Muslims—and this man is working against the interest of Muslims).

I am also willing to help out the readers of Indian Express with their query: Is Sri Sri’s quote below conveys his scepticism on the Supreme Court’s competence to adjudicate the matter?

“We respect the courts (!) but the court cannot connect hearts. After 50 years or 100 years, the judgement of courts will remain as such. But if a solution comes from our hearts, it will be recognized for ages.”

Indeed, Sri Sri has often mentioned that Muslims, by and large, are not opposing Ram temples. While meeting Sunni cleric Maulana Khalid Rasheed Farangi Mahali in Lucknow, Sri Sri had said: “There is really no conflict between the communities. We have been living together for centuries and we have to create an atmosphere of friendliness and togetherness.”

The Indian Express even allowed bigotry in condemning Sri Sri Ravi Shankar’s choice as a mediator. “Since the Court preferred to term the dispute a religious matter, potentially impacting our politics, ideally a religious figure should have been kept away from the mediation process.”

The newspaper was willing to overlook that Sri Sri has a reputation of peace-maker and his Art of Living (AOL) isn’t a religious discourse. Don’t they know that in 2015, Sri Sri was awarded Colombia’s highest civilian award for “conflict resolution and rehabilitation in war-ridden areas”? For decades, Sri Sri has been working to bring together disparate groups to find a solution to conflict-ridden matters.

Isn’t a man such as Sri Sri Ravi Shankar best suited to find a solution to Ayodhya riddle? If yes, then why newspapers such as The Hindu and Indian Express won’t welcome a solution? Who benefits if the country is divided? Indeed, who benefits—I leave the readers to find their own answers.