Home Blog Page 2092

PM Modi to address Joint US Congress this week: The past 11 times he addressed foreign legislature and how he surpasses past PMs

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is all set to address a joint session of the US Congress on Thursday (June 22). He will be on a State visit to the United States between June 21 and June 24 this year.

The historic invite was extended to PM Modi by US House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell and House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries.

Interestingly, this will be the 12th occasion when Prime Minister Narendra Modi will address the legislature of a foreign nation – a historic feat not achieved by other world leaders. He holds the distinction of addressing the Parliament of 11 countries in the past 9 years, thus surpassing all his predecessors. Follow is the list of foreign parliaments addressed by PM Narendra Modi.

List of Foreign Parliaments addressed by PM Narendra Modi

  • Bhutan – Shortly after becoming the Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi was invited to address the joint session of the Bhutanese parliament on June 16, 2014. During his speech, he emphasised, “India is committed to good relations with its neighbours. Stability and development in India will help neighbours like Bhutan.” PM Modi was also given a guard of honour.
  • Nepal: Two months later in August, he addressed the Constituent Assembly of Nepal. “Our relations with Nepal are as old as the Himalayas and the Ganga…It’s the land where Lord Buddha was born, this country has rich cultural heritage…India is looking at Nepal with hope,” PM Modi had said.
  • Australia: He also addressed the Joint Session of the Australian Parliament in November 18, 2014. This honour was not accorded to any other Prime Minister before Narendra Modi. “Today, as I stand in this temple of democracy, I consider nations such as ours to be blessed, because democracy offers the best opportunity for the human spirit to flourish, because we have the freedom to choose, the right to speak and the power to remove – and, for us in politics, with no option but to leave with grace,” he had remarked.
  • Fiji: A day after addressing the Parliament in Australia, PM Modi was in Suva to address the Fiji Parliament on November 19, 2014. It was the first time that any world leader was given the opportunity to make a speech at the country’s legislature. In May this year, Narendra Modi was awarded the highest civilian award i.e. Companion of the Order of Fiji (CF) by Prime Minister Sitiveni Rubuka.

Sri Lanka: On March 13, 2015, Prime Minister Modi addressed the Parliament of the island nation, Sri Lanka. It was also the first instance when an Indian PM was accorded the opportunity. “I am convinced that the future of any country is influenced by the state of its neighbourhood. The future that I dream for India is also the future that I wish for our neighbours. We in this region are on the same journey: to transform the lives of our people,” he said during his historic address.

Mongolia: Two months later, he was in Mongolia to address the ‘State Great Khural’ (the country’s unicameral Parliament). Interestingly, it was also the first time that an Indian Prime Minister visited the East Asian nation.

United Kingdom: On November 12, 2015, Prime Minister Narendra Modi delivered his historic address at the Parliament of the United Kingdom. “So much of the modern history of India is linked to this building. So much history looms across our relationship,” he had said on the momentous ocaasion.

Afghanistan: The Indian government aided the construction of the Parliament of the war-torn nation of Afghanistan. While inaugurating the building on December 25, 2015, PM Modi stated, “A country with an abiding faith in the tradition of Jirga has chosen the path of democracy. And, it has done it against challenges that would have defeated a lesser people.”

United States: On June 9, 2016, PM Modi addressed a Joint Session of the US Congress. He said, “In granting me this opportunity, you have honoured the world’s largest democracy and its 1.25 billion people. As a representative of the world’s largest democracy, it is indeed a privilege to speak to the leaders of its oldest.”

Uganda: On July 15, 2018, he addressed the parliament of Uganda, making him the first Indian Prime Minister to be accorded such a privilege. “Today, India and Africa stand on the threshold of a future of great promise…India is proud to be Africa’s partner. Uganda is central to our commitment to the continent,” PM Modi shad said then.

Maldives: Narendra Modi addressed the parliament of Maldives on June 8, 2019. During the speech, the Indian Prime Minister pointed out, “Neighbourhood First is our priority. And in the neighbourhood, Maldives is a priority. And therefore, it is no coincidence that I stand amidst you today.

How do past PMs fare

It must be mentioned that other Indian Prime Ministers do not even come close to the number of times that PM Modi had addressed the legislature of a foreign nation.

For instance, ex-Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh addressed foreign Parliaments on a total of 7 occasions during his 10-year tenure. The number is lower for Indira Gandhi, who was accorded the opportunity only 4 times in 15 years

India’s first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru addressed foreign legislature a total of 3 times in 16 years. PM Rajiv Gandhi and Atal Bihari Vajpayee could do it twice during their 5-year terms. PV Narasimha Rao and Morarji Desai got the opportunity only once.

So far, only 5 Prime Ministers other than Narendra Modi addressed the US Congress. They include Jawaharlal Nehru, Rajiv Gandhi, PV Narasimha Rao, Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Manmohan Singh.

On June 22, 2023, PM Modi will become the first Indian Prime Minister to address a joint session of the US Congress twice.

Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar shot dead in Canada, four days after terrorist Avtar Khanda’s mysterious death in a UK hospital

On June 18 (local time), Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar was shot dead in Surrey, Canada. He was a wanted terrorist by the Indian Government. Nijjar was the head of Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara Sahib. He was shot dead by two unidentified assailants within the Gurdwara premises. 46-year-old Nijjar hailed from the village Bhar Singhpura of Jalandhar. Four days ago, Khalistani terrorist Avtar Khanda mysteriously died in a UK Hospital.

His name was added to the list of designated terrorists recently by the Indian Government. In 2022, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) declared a Rs 10 lakh reward on Nijjar after his name appeared in a conspiracy to kill a Hindu priest in Jalandhar, Punjab.

Khalistan Tiger Force (KTF) was behind the conspiracy to kill the Hindu priest. Nijaar was the chief of the Khalistani terrorist organization KTF. Apart from his activities in KTF, Nijjar was also linked to the Khalistani terrorist organization Sikhs For Justice. He reportedly went to Australia for a ‘Referendum’ voting recently. NIA also booked him in a conspiracy to commit terrorist activities against India.

In its investigation against Nijjar, NIA found that he had made incriminating remarks, published objectionable content and shared media, including photos and videos on social media, with an aim to create tension in India.

As per NIA’s document on Najjar, “The incriminating evidence thus gathered substantiates that he is involved in exhorting seditionary and insurrectionary imputations and also attempting to create disharmony among different communities in India.”

In 2018, a list of wanted criminals was handed over by then-Chief Minister of Punjab, Captain Amarinder Singh, to Canada PM Justin Trudeau. Nijjar’s name was included in the list.

In 2020, the Punjab Government seized 11 kanal and 13.5 marlas of land belonging to Nijjar in his native village.

Last week in the UK, Khalistani terrorist Avtar Singh Khanda, chief of the banned Khalistan Liberation Force (KLF), died in a hospital on Thursday. It is suspected that the main handler of Khalistani separatist Amritpal Singh was poisoned. However, some media reports say that he was suffering from blood cancer.

‘No Muslim in India is a descendant of Aurangzeb’: Maha Deputy CM Devendra Fadnavis

0

Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said on Sunday that no Muslim in India is a descendant of Aurangzeb, and nationalist Muslims in the country do not recognize the Mughal emperor as their ruler.

Fadnavis also said that there is only one king, and that is Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and the Muslims also respect him. “Our king is only Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. We cannot have another king. Muslims in India are not descendants of Aurangzeb. Aurangzeb and his clan came from outside. A Muslim in this country who has national ideas never approves of Aurangzeb. He respects only Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj,” Devendra Fadnavis while addressing a public rally in Maharashtra’s Akola.

The public rally was organised by the BJP in commemoration of PM Narendra Modi-led government completing nine years in the Centre.

Earlier on Thursday, June 8, tension simmered in Maharashtra’s Kolhapur after some youth allegedly posted objectionable posts on social media with a reference to Aurangzeb and Tipu Sultan.

Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis slammed supporters of the erstwhile Mughal ruler. “Suddenly, in some districts of Maharashtra, sons of Aurangzeb took birth. They keep the status of Aurangzeb and show their posters. Because of this, there are tensions. Questions arise, where do these sons of Aurangzeb come from? Who are behind this? We will find this out,” said Fadnavis while talking to ANI in Nagpur.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

The Truth and Bollywood’s creative block: How film fraternity insults Hindus with sheer lack of intellect and what it can actually learn from the West

There are about 450 movies made on the Holocaust. With a simple web search, lists of hundreds of movies on black slavery open up. More than 100 movies, series, and documentaries have been made on the British monarchy. There are at least 100 superhero movies from the West. From documenting true stories and producing fictional scripts on true events in history to producing plain fiction, the Western film industry seems clear about its creative direction.

And yet Bollywood, considered to be the world’s largest film industry, massively fails to tell the tale of one of India’s most revered deities Bhagwan Shri Ram whose life story and principles are etched in the hearts and minds of every Hindu, the Indian majority.

‘Adipurush,’ a film written and directed by Om Raut on Ramayana, has received massive backlash from viewers over its boorish dialogues, vexatious optics, foolish casting, and blatant diversion from the facts.

The 600 crore-budget movie is produced by T-series and Retrophiles. Read the detailed review of the movie here. The credit for crass dialogues goes to Manoj Muntashir, who has now said that the few offending dialogues would be removed.

B-Town: A faraway world isolated from its country’s revered history

There are merely 3 movies on Ramayana, including Adipurush, from mainstream Bollywood; the first one is the highest-grossing of its time, Ram Rajya (1943), and the second is the renowned Sampoorna Ramayana (1961).

And yet Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayana has set a benchmark too high for present-day B-wood to reach let alone breach. Ramayan (series) during the lockdown became the world’s most-watched show in April 2020; it was watched by 77 million people across the world on 16 April 2020.

Ramayana in digital age - first episode crashes DD's website, top searched in India on Google
Stills from the Ramayan and Mahabharat TV shows

The one and only movie on Mahabharat was produced in 1965 starring Dara Singh, Jeevan, Padmini, and many big names of the time. Another is BR Chopra’s Mahabharat which is a celebrated watch to this day.

From North to South, East to West, Jai Santoshi Maa (1975) swept the Indian landscape with its all-encompassing story of the Divinity of Goddess Santoshi.

Indian regional cinema on the contrary has tens of hundreds of Ramayanas, Mahabharatas, and several other such productions based on spiritual Indian history. And each of these productions is full of creativity in their story-telling.

Hindi-dubbed Telugu film Seetha Kalyanam (1976).

These movies continue to strike a chord with the Hindu masses. Not to mention the massive reach of skits on Ramayana in remote areas of India, the Ramayana Path, and Geeta Kathavachan in small cities and towns; these continue to draw the Indian masses even in this age of technology.

Looking at the above trends, “modern-day” Bollywood has absolutely nothing to its credit in so far as the Divine and revered history of India is concerned. To them, like to the self-proclaimed left-liberal intellectuals, this is the stuff of mythology. And for this very reason, they can stake claim only to the flop-buster Adipurush.

Bollywood’s hate for the Hindu Identity

Forget spiritual history for a bit. How many movies has Bollywood made showcasing the truth about the partition of India? Zero. Whatever pain the Urduwood would have taken to make some 20-30 movies on 1947, they have all been highly politically correct.

Most of these movies are centred around Hindu-Muslim romances with the couple fighting against the world. Some common misleading projections have been that “both sides suffered,” “love goes beyond religion,” “Muslims didn’t want this,” “Islam only wants peace,” so on and so forth. Not a single director, screenwriter, or dialogue writer in this grand old film industry has neither cared for nor been able to explain that if any of these claims are true then why was Pakistan formed in the first place?

Shahrukh Khan with Kashmiri separatist Tony Ashai (L) and Karan Johar with ISI aide Aneel Mussarat (R).

Then again, penetrating the glib mind is a wasted endeavour. The truth is too bitter for the strutting Bollywood wannabe. There will never be a movie about the truth about partition because “they can’t handle the truth”; Partition was the snatching of the Hindu land by deceit, it was an additional option for the Muslims to conveniently choose their homeland and in turn the forced removal of Hindus.

The condition of Pakistani Hindus today is proof of what the formation of Pakistan truly was; the formation of an Islamic nation was declared. Bollywood would rather play safe to appropriate this truth even today than bother writing a screenplay on the plight of Pak Hindu refugees, and Hindu women in present-day Pakistan.

There is no dearth of stories from Indian history that, if pursued with pure intentions, to tell the truth, can be produced as fiction and non-fiction too. But think about it…has there been any movie before The Kashmir Files (2022) that mainstream Bollywood made on the plight of Kashmiri Hindus?

The Kashmir Files
The Kashmir Files (Image Source: Indian Express)

Has there been any remarkable movie on our thousands of freedom fighters except for one on Veer Savarkar (2001) by the same name, and Manikarnika (2019) and perhaps a few more?

Poster of the 2001 movie Veer Savarkar (Source: IMDB)

Forget making movies on the Indian struggle against jihadi Islam, Bollywood has comfortably forgotten the Mughal history of India and instead venerated Islam. From Coolie, Amar Akbar Anthony, Sholay, Avam (BR Chopra) to PK, Veer Zara, Tanhaji, Pathan, Main Hoon Na, and many many more.

Atheism and communism have been shamelessly philosophied by Dawood-wood whenever scenes on Hinduism were being shown, but for Bollywood, the same does not apply to Islam.

As if this was not enough, with Adipurush this industry has hit a new low by deliberately making a laughter show out of our beloved Devis and Devatas. Any of these “artists” trying to justify the same are rubbing salt in our wounds.

Where does Bollywood get its epiphanies from?

Even if one were to say that they try to copy the West, the sheer low quality of their work is surprising still. Some of the most famous Western movies of all time include Schindler’s List, Life Is Beautiful, The Help, The Imitation Game, 12 Years A Slave, Erin Brockovich, Argo, Catch Me If You Can, Rush, Hachi: A Dog’s Tale, The Blind Side, Munich, The Vow, A Few Good Men and Jojo Rabbit.

A still from Jojo Rabbit (2019) (Source: Cinema Blend)

These range from a variety of true events or are based on actual circumstances. From Holocaust, black slavery, biopics, and crime to romance, nation, and more, which subjects have foreign cinema including Hollywood not touched upon in so far as their history and culture are concerned?

Even in their fictional projects, Hollywood has taken the premise of real events to present a new perspective compelling the audiences to think differently. Jojo Rabbit is one such movie…right from the cinematography to the storyline and acting, every element has done justice to showcase a 10-year-old boy’s worldview in Nazi Germany.

And yet, for critics like Rich Brownstein, who care more about the facts of their history than mere cinematography, creative ventures at the cost of truth are not enough. Brownstein has a strong disliking for Oscar-winning Schindler’s List.

He says, “The glorification of Nazis, I’m going to say, the humanization of barbarians is a hard no for me. I’m gonna hold the line there. And that’s my main complaint about ‘Schindler’s List.’ Oskar Schindler was a repulsive, repugnant, horrible human being while the first five-and-a-half million Jews were killed. He didn’t care; he participated. And then all of a sudden, he grew a conscience, so he became a normal person. He didn’t become a good person. You would think somebody who was a cog, who had been participating with the Germans since 1936, that guy doesn’t get elevated.”

Brownstein’s reservations are for more such critically-acclaimed movies with the argument that they humanize the perpetrators. This is even after 25% of all American-made Holocaust films have been nominated for an Academy Award.

Now compare the above situation to Bollywood. We have already established that they do not have much to their credit, but have surely made things worse. They don’t dare to make movies based on true stories because the truth does not support their narrative so let’s leave it at that; their movies have largely been based on fiction; they openly deny the suffering of Hindus and pitch Islam as the religion of peace and Hindus as corrupt; they preach brotherhood with Pakistan; they call Hindu history “mythology”; their unending humanitarian gyaan is reserved only for Hindus and Hindu Deities.

It is tough to say whether Bollywood derives any inspiration from the foreign cinema at all or if they only take away the wrong message to suit their agenda. The reason one thinks that Bollywood probably looks up to Hollywood is because of the wannabe Game of Thrones and Marvel-like optics in their movies, devoid of any cultural connection with the audience even when the story is India’s very own.

As far as Adipurush is concerned, whoever asked Om Raut and the team to touch the subject? Not the Ram-revering Hindu for sure. Unless of course, they meant to insult us.

No understanding of their audience, no understanding of their culture, no knowledge of history

How does the world’s biggest film industry in a country with 80% Hindu population manage to rip into shreds the story of Ramayana? The only logical answer based on the above anatomy is the deep cultural disconnect.

It takes knowing the pulse of everyday India. It takes witnessing the spiritual sentiments of a middle-class Hindu. It takes experiencing the Divinity at holy sites. It takes learning what it means to be stripped of one’s identity. It takes learning what it means to watch your old life being reduced to dust only to start a new one in a new land. It takes reading about the heroes in our history who chose death and suffering for the nation over compromise. That is if B-Town has the time for these apart from the exploits of fame and money.

Bollywood is marred by the blot of terrorism. Why we Indians, including ardent Hindus, have after all these years not banned Bollywood is beyond my understanding. The Indian Regional Cinema has much to offer as far as Indian culture and history are concerned. And as for creative inspiration, foreign cinema is at our disposal so long as we do not let falsehoods and half-truths veil our judgment.

The Bollywood fraternity in support of Sanjay Dutt when he was arrested under the TADA and the Arms Act in 1993. He was convicted for violation of Arms Act for possession of illegal weapons procured from the accused in the 1993 Mumbai terrorist attacks.

Adipurush has proven that Bollywood is ill-intended toward Hindus, they lack the skill and delicate craftsmanship required to tell one of the greatest epics of this land and let’s not kid ourselves, they never meant to do justice to it. Any Hindu expecting Bollywood to tell their stories truthfully is fooling themselves.

Gujarat: Fake claims on social media after violence in Junagadh, know the truth behind ‘dargah demolition’ and ‘police atrocity on Muslims’

On the night of Friday, June 16, 2023, an unfortunate incident of stone pelting and arson occurred in Junagadh, resulting in injuries to four policemen present at the scene. Tragically, a Hindu man lost his life while passing by during the incident. Swift action was taken by the police to bring the situation under control after the mob created chaos, leading to the arrest of several miscreants. While the police are actively investigating the case, a propaganda campaign has emerged on social media regarding the violence in Junagadh.

It is being claimed on social media that Muslim youths in Junagadh were protesting against the demolition of the dargah and mosque, after which they were beaten up in public. Journalist Asif Mujtaba tweeted a video and wrote, “Muslims are being flogged in Gujarat because they protested against arbitrary & communal demolitions of shrines & mosques. There have been multiple cases where even sub judice structures were demolished without even waiting for a final court order. Muslims come on the road for protest only if it is a last resort to them, only if they have been failed by the executive, legislature & judiciary. The flogging is a serious violation of Human rights & shows the communal mindset of the machinery of the State.”

In addition to this, numerous tweets have surfaced containing serious allegations. Ashok Swain, a habitual fake news peddler, claimed that the Gujarat police publicly beat a group of Muslim individuals for protesting against the demolition of a local mosque. Furthermore, he drew a comparison between this police action and the actions of the Taliban.

He wrote, “Police in Gujarat, India, publicly flogging a group of Muslims because they had protested against the demolition of a local mosque. Why does the world blame the Taliban?”

Apart from this, many such tweets were made in which misleading claims were made. One Professor Ilyas wrote, “Police in Gujarat, India, publicly flogging a group of Muslims because they had protested against the demolition of a local mosque. Where are human rights organizations? Where is Zalme Khalilzad?”

Ilyas Tunha wrote, “Police in Gujarat, India, publicly flogging a group of Muslims because they had protested against the demolition of a local mosque. This is the Real Face of the Hindutva BJP Modi RSS extremist government. Muslim, Christian, Dalit genocide is upcoming in India.”

What actually happened?

The issue is regarding the proposed demolition of a dargah (referred to as a mosque in some instances, but it is indeed a dargah).

On June 14, the Junagadh Municipal Corporation issued notices to a total of eight religious sites located on public roads within the municipal area. Notably, out of these eight locations, three are Hindu temples, while the remaining five are dargahs. One of the dargahs, located near Majewadi Gate, has sparked controversy.

Notices were served to these religious-religious places:

1) Hanumanji Temple, Shantashwar Road, Joshipura
2) Judwa Hanumanji Temple, Vanjawad
3) Dargah of Hazrat Roshanshahpir Baba, next to Trimurti Hospital
4) Hazrat Jamiyal Shah Datar Dargah, Danapith Chowk
5) Hazrat Gabanshah Peer Dargah, Danapith Chowk
6) Hazrat Khiznishah Peer Dargah, opposite Majewadi Gate (which caused a ruckus)
7) Dargah of Datar Peer, near Sabalpur bus station
8) Jalaram Temple, Nilgagan Apa. in front of

The municipal administration served notices to all religious sites, requesting them to provide evidence of authorized ownership and construction. At that point, no decision had been made regarding demolition, nor was it under consideration. A video contains a statement from the town planner of the Junagadh Municipal Corporation affirming this. Additionally, the Junagadh Municipal Commissioner clarified that the sole purpose was to request documents from these religious sites and that there were no discussions or intentions of demolition.

It’s important to note that the municipality cannot be accused of targeting any specific religion, as notices were served to both temples and dargahs that have been prima facie illegally built, demonstrating that similar actions were taken against religious sites of different faiths.

The truth of so-called dargah demolition

On Friday, June 16, 2023, municipal officials visited the Dargah and affixed a notice. Subsequently, starting in the evening, a crowd from the Muslim community began to gather, and tensions escalated throughout the night. Due to the large gathering, the police became actively involved, and officials approached the crowd, engaging in negotiations for approximately 45 minutes in an attempt to clear the road.

At approximately 10:15 pm, the situation took a violent turn as the mob began pelting stones at the police, causing them to retreat while the crowd dispersed, chanting religious slogans. The situation escalated as stones were pelted, police vehicles were vandalized, State Transport (ST) buses were targeted, and several motorcycles were set ablaze. Tragically, during the attack, four policemen sustained injuries, and a Hindu man lost his life while passing by the area.

As the situation continued to escalate, the police found it necessary to employ measures such as lathi charges and tear gas to disperse the unruly mob. They swiftly established a tight police security arrangement to restore law and order. In order to apprehend the individuals responsible for the stone-pelting and rioting, the police conducted combing operations throughout the night. These operations targeted the very individuals who had engaged in stone-throwing.

Following the incident, an FIR was registered at the Junagadh police station against 31 identified individuals and a mob of approximately 500 others. On Saturday, it was reported that 180 people were detained based on the information provided. The search for the remaining suspects is currently underway. Additionally, the police are reviewing CCTV footage and will take appropriate action against anyone found to be involved in criminal activities.

Minor children were also made to participate in the violence

It should also be noted here that minor children were also used by the mob during the stone-pelting and in some videos, the minors were also seen pelting stones. The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights has come into action and has written a letter to the police demanding strict action against such elements.

In a letter to Junagadh police, the commission said that in the video of the incident, it can be seen that minor children were also part of the mob and they can also be seen pelting stones. “Prima facie, this is a violation of Sections 83(2) and 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act as well as other appropriate sections of the IPC,” the commission said. An FIR should be lodged for violation of these sections and the persons responsible for the offense should be traced and investigated. The commission had asked for an inquiry and report within seven days of receiving the letter.

Tamil Nadu: Chennai Police arrests DMK leader Sivaji Krisnamurthy over derogatory comments against BJP’s Khushbu Sunder and Governor

On June 18, Chennai Police arrested expelled DMK leader Sivaji Krishnamurthy over derogatory comments against Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader and National Commission for Women (NCW) member Khushbu Sunder and Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi. The Kodungaiyur Police took suo moto cognizance and registered a case against Krishnamurthy.

BJP’s Khushbu slams DMK leader

Earlier, BJP’s Khushbu slammed the DMK for providing a platform for derogatory and lewd comments against women. She said that NCW would take up the matter by itself. She broke down while speaking to the media and said the matter had already been brought to the notice of the Tamil Nadu State Commission for Women. A video of Krishnamurthy was also uploaded on her Twitter profile.

She said, “The crass comments of this habitual offender show the political culture prevalent in DMK. There are many like him in that rut. Abusing women, passing lewd cheap comments about them goes unchecked and is probably rewarded with more opportunities.”

Tagging CM Stalin, she wrote, “What you don’t realize is he not only insults me but you and a great leader like your father (late M Karunanidhi). The more space you provide him, the more political space you will lose. Your party is becoming a safe haven for uncouth hooligans. It’s such a shame.”

Addressing the media on behalf of all women, Khushbu called out political parties over the unacceptable attitude of their leaders towards women. She said, “Don’t be afraid. I am there, we (NCW, apparently) are there. I will stand up for you.”

Krishnamurthy’s derogatory comments against Governor

Before passing derogatory remarks against Khushbu, Krishnamurthy had given a controversial speech about Governor RN Ravi. In a statement, BJP state president K Annamalai condemned the comments and demanded immediate action. He said the comments against the two “are highly condemnable, and we demand immediate action on this repeat offender.”

Annamalai shared a video of Krishnamurthy where he was passing derogatory remarks against the Governor in the light of portfolio re-allocation of the Tamil Nadu Cabinet after the arrest of state minister V Senthil Balaji.

DMK Suspended Krishnamurthy

Following the controversial remarks about the Governor, DMK suspended Krishnamurthy. However, it was revoked after he issued an apology. He was expelled from the party after passing comments against Khushbu. DMK general secretary Duraimurugan announced the expulsion and said, “Sivaji Krishnamurthy is being dismissed from all party posts, including the primary membership, for violating party discipline and bringing disrepute to it.”

Another Hindu comes under attack for expressing his opinion: Islamists, including Congress member and ‘journalist’ outrage, UAE initiates investigation

On Saturday (June 17), Islamists on social media decided to gang up on an Indian Hindu businessman named Ram (name changed) for extending his support to Nupur Sharma.

Ram had criticised the growing Islamism in India, attempts to encroach upon Hindu land under the pretext of offering prayers, and appeasement politics.

He had also been vocal against the sinister agenda to normalise hijab in schools, Islamists spitting on food and the menace of love jihad. Given that some of his tweets had Dubai as the geo-location, Islamists sought his immediate arrest and deportation from the Gulf nation.

Islamists, both in India and abroad, attempted to project the Hindu businessman as ‘anti-Muslim’ and ‘Islamophobic’.

“One of the ways to support the Muslims of India is not to allow room for anti-Muslim haters in India, especially in the GCC, such as this guy residing in UAE, who stirring up sedition & religious strife against Muslims in his country. The immediate punishment is deportation,” wrote ‘columnist’ Abdulla Alamadi.

“This is the account of Ram (on) Facebook. Please Dubai police take strict action against this man,” one Islamist wished after sharing the screenshot of the Indian Hindu businessman’s LinkedIn profile.

“Lives in a Muslim country and spouts crap like this. Get him out and shut his businesses down now. People like this cannot benefit from being in a Muslim country and saying these kinds of comments,” wrote another Islamist.

One Mohammed Sher Ali remarked, ” This person living in Dubai, whose name is Ram, wants to destroy the Muslims, if it is accepted then the government should ban five times Namaz. @DubaiPoliceHQ please take action on them.”

One Sohain Anjum wrote, “Hello @DubaiPoliceHQ please could you look into this Dubai resident spreading Islamic hatred in India whilst living safely in the UAE. Next, he will claim his account was hacked. Any Dubai peeps come across this guy??”

Congress troll ‘Ria’ also joined hands with the Islamist in hounding Ram. “His profile on Facebook is still active. @DubaiPoliceHQ please make sure that this Islamophobic man Ram is punished and deported and denied visa of all GCC countries.”

‘Journalist’ Ashraf Hussain tweeted, “UAE authorities have started an investigation against an Indian origin Ram after his Islamophobic tweets went viral.”

Twitter handle ‘South Asia Index’ also claimed that the authorities in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have launched an investigation into the supposed ‘Islamophobic tweets’ of Ram.

In 2018, a 28-year-old Indian named Vishnu Dev Radhakrishnan was arrested by the police in Saudi Arabia on charges of blasphemy. 

Around the same time, Michelin Starred Celebrity Chef Atul Kochhar has seen his livelihood threatened by Islamist trolls and a restaurant aggregator, following his tweet where he highlighted the age-old Islamist persecution of Hindus.

Former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma was similarly subjected to death and rape threats by Islamists over a cropped video shared by Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair

Note: We have masked and changed the name of the Hindu living in UAE so as to ensure his safety does not get compromised.

Junagadh Violence: Conspiracy to burn bus full of passengers exposed, Islamist mob let passengers go after the driver told them he was a Muslim

Junagadh violence took place on June 16 after Municipal Corporation sent notice to an illegal Dargah. The violent Islamist mob attacked police, pelted stones and burned public and private property. Both government and private vehicles were damaged during the violence.

Among those vehicles, an ST Bus was going to Vijaynagar from Junagadh. In the attack, a bus driver, conductor and a senior citizen got injured. They were admitted to a civil hospital for treatment. ST Bus conductor and driver narrated the horrifying incident.

They said, “We left Junagadh depo at 10:15 PM on the Junagadh-Vijaynagar bus. There were 25 people on the bus. When the vehicle reached Majewadi Gate, the mob started pelting stones at the bus. Around 500 people attacked the bus and broke the windows. They closed the bus from outside and called for burning down the bus. The police reached on time and dispersed the mob.

Bus driver Asif Qureshi said, “The mob threw large stones inside the bus. The first stone entered the bus after breaking the driver-side window and hit me on the right elbow. They kept attacking the bust while passengers were inside. They saved themselves by hiding under the seats. We requested them with folded hands to let the passengers leave. They only let us leave when I told them my name was Asifbhai. They believed me and let us leave.”

The passengers were so scared that they ran away without luggage. The driver said the mob ransacked the bus after the passengers left.

As per reports, the Municipal Corporation had sent a notice to an illegal dargah located at Majewadi Gate to show documents within five days. On June 16, the mob started to gather outside Dargah and at around 10 PM, they attacked the police. The mob damaged vehicles and burnt some of them. They also pelted stones.

Mumbai couple accused in ₹300 crore drug distribution racket flees with ₹174 crore after getting summons, MP police issue lookout notice

The Madhya Pradesh Police have issued a lookout circular (LOC) for a Ashish Kumar Shailesh Mehta and Shivani Mehta, a Mumbai couple who masterminded a Rs 300 crore home-based drug distribution racket and have intriguingly vanished from the police radar in Mumbai and Khaniyadhan in Madhya Pradesh’s Shivpuri district on Sunday. They lived in an opulent, now-abandoned and locked flat in Mumbai’s Goregaon neighbourhood. It is believed that they fled with a huge sum of ₹174 crores from their drug money after police summoned them to question them.

The matter came to light after a suspected drug dealer from Mira Road (Thane), 39-year-old Nissar Zubair Khan, was apprehended two weeks ago with Mephedrone worth Rs 17 lakh. During questioning, he named the duo. He also accused them of participating in a number of illegal operations involving drug trafficking, Ponzi schemes and scams related to digital currencies.

During the investigation, Khan claimed that he is just a courier man for the woman and her husband in Mumbai. He claimed that he did not know what was inside the packet when it was handed over to him by the couple. He told police that the couple used to call him to their residence at Oberoi Esquire in Goregaon East to collect parcels. For every consignment, he would be given a new mobile phone and a new SIM card, and the delivery address to deliver the parcel to. After delivering the parcel to the address, he was asked to discard the phone and the SIM.

Nissar Zubair Khan said that the packet of drugs that police found with him was given to him on June 6 by Ashish Kumar Shailesh Mehta after calling him to their residence, and it was to be delivered at an address in Chanderi town of Madhya Pradesh.

Based on his statement, a team of Madhya Pradesh police visited the couple’s house on 11 June, along with Arrey police in Mumbai. They handed them summons asking to appear before the MP police for questioning on June 13. However, Ashish Kumar Shailesh Mehta and Shivani Mehta failed to appear before the police on that day. After that Mumbai police commissioner contacted them and asked them to cooperate with MP Police in the probe, but they still didn’t appear. Covering the story, a Mid-Day team even visited the residence, but they refused to talk.

Afterwards, on June 16, an eight-person squad from the Madhya Pradesh Police travelled to Mumbai, but by then they had fled their residence. When they visited the house with Aarey police, they found the main door locked. The driver told them that they left him the previous day. The phone number that Ashish Mehta gave them was also found switched off.

Police say that the couple were aware of the police visit and therefore they fled beforehand. According to police sources, the couple transferred a whopping Rs 174 crore to multiple accounts after they were summoned, and are believed to have left the country before the lookout notice was issued.

Police found the bank account details from the mobile phone records, and found that Mehta has been constantly transferring money from his account. On Thursday, he transferred around Rs 70 lakh and on Friday Rs 26 lakh from this account to various other accounts. The initial balance in the account was ₹300 crore, which came down to ₹126 crore, showing that they transferred ₹174 crore to various accounts. As per official accounts, these additional accounts may now be assessed throughout the investigation.

The lawyer of the couple has, however, claimed that his clients were being set up and asked for additional time to provide the police with all the information they required.

An anti-narcotics team from the Mumbai Police Crime Branch paid a visit to the Oberoi Esquire building on Saturday morning where the couple was staying, but neither the neighbours nor the security personnel had much information. Meanwhile, a notice summoning them for questioning by or before Sunday was posted on their door by the Madhya Pradesh Police. Along with that, the MP police also issued a lookout notice for the couple.

Shivani Mehta and her husband Ashish Kumar Shailesh Mehta, both entrepreneurs and aficionados for digital money, are charged with conducting a drug distribution network from their residence in an affluent high-rise in Goregaon. It was also found that they provided false names, numbers and other details to the residential society.

‘No threat to family’: Minor wrestler’s father refutes Sakshi Malik’s claims that statement against WFI chief was changed due to threats

The father of the minor wrestler, who had initially levelled sexual harassment allegations against WFI President Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and later said that it was false allegations, has firmly dismissed the claims made by Sakshi Malik. A day earlier, Malik had released a video statement in which she claimed that the minor wrestler changed her statement against Singh because her family was under threat. 

Speaking to India Today, the Minor wrestler’s father stressed that his family had not received any threats as claimed by protesting wrestler Sakshi Malik. He also urged Malik to clarify the basis of her statement.

His counter came in the wake of a video statement released by Sakshi Malik and her husband Satyawart Kadian. In the video, Malik alleged that the minor wrestler changed her statement against Singh on account of threats faced by her family.

As reported by India Today, the minor wrestler’s father said, “We have done what we needed to do. There is no truth to such claims of threats against our family.”

In her video statement, Sakshi Malik argued that the minor wrestler gave statements against Singh twice. She gave her first statement to the Police under Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and subsequently, she presented her statement before a magistrate under Section 164.

Malik further claimed that the minor wrestler revised her statement because of fear of intimidation. 

Malik’s remarks came shortly after the Delhi Police recommended the dismissal of the complaint under POCSO filed by the minor wrestler against Singh, citing a lack of corroborative evidence. The Delhi court will consider the cancellation report filed by Delhi Police on the 4th of July.

Earlier in the day, Bhabita Phogat had also refuted the claims made by the wrestler husband-wife duo that she helped in getting permission for protests at Jantar Mantar in January.   

In a detailed statement on Twitter, Babita called Sakshi a puppet of Congress and urged her to answer the public about their real intentions.

Babita said, “Let me be clear that the permission letter shown by my younger sister has no proof of my signature or my consent anywhere, nor do I have anything to do with it far and wide.”

Adding that she has faith in PM and the judicial system, she asserted that she was never in favour of a sit-in protest from the beginning. She added that she always told the wrestlers that they should meet the PM or Home Minister as the solution would come from there.

It is notable that earlier this month, the father of a minor wrestler, who filed a complaint against WFI’s Brij Bhushan Singh, said that they had filed a false case against Singh due to anger against him. According to him, he was angry with Singh because his daughter was not selected to join a competition.

He and his minor daughter gave revised statements before a magistrate on 5 June, confirming that she was not sexually harassed by Singh as alleged earlier. However, they didn’t withdraw the complaint.

“We have no grudge against Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh. We recorded fresh statements on June 5 and we changed a few of our earlier statements. I am the father of a girl and I don’t want to get involved in this fight. I had not withdrawn the complaint but recorded fresh statements. In anger, we had levelled some false allegations. My daughter had faced some issues, but all those mentioned in the FIR were not true,” the father had said.

Following this, Delhi police filed a cancellation report in the POCSO case filed based on the complaint. However, a chargesheet was filed in other allegations of harassment levelled by other adult female wrestlers against Singh.

Protesting wrestlers, including Sakshi Malik, Vinesh Phogat, and Bajrang Punia, have demanded the arrest of Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh. They have accused him of sexual harassment against seven wrestlers, including a minor. On the 15th of June, the Delhi Police filed a chargesheet for the offenses under sections 354 (Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty), 354A (making sexually coloured remarks), 354D (stalking) of IPC against Singh.