Home Blog Page 6905

Watch: ‘He should change his name instead,’ Renuka Chowdhury proposal to rename Hyderabad

0

A day after BJP MLA Raja Singh said that if the BJP comes to power in Telangana, Hyderabad may be renamed to Bhagyanagar, Congress leader Renuka Chowdhury hit out on Singh and said if he wishes, he could change his name instead.


Chowdhury said, “What does he think? By doing all this dialogue-baazi, he will get votes? I am a Hyderabadi and with great pride we say we are Hyderabadis. Who is he to interfere? To change name? He could go change his name if he wants. No one will object. If he tries to change city’s name, our identity it will not be good for Singh ji.”

In September, Telangana Cabinet dissolved state assembly, paving way for early polls. Telangana Assembly elections will be held on 7th December along with Rajasthan and the results will be declared on 11th December along with Mizoram, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, and Rajasthan polls.

‘Liberal’ meltdown for Statue of Unity is getting more creative with Shekhar Gupta’s The Print leading the charge

The Statue of Unity recently inaugurated on the bank of Narmada by PM Modi has been guilty of causing heartaches and major meltdowns by a section of India’s secular, intellectual liberals. From the hurt sentiments of it not being a statue of Gandhi-Nehru family to its height and expenses, the arguments have been as diverse as numerous.

Here are some of the most popular excuses run by eminent intellectuals against the statue.

  1. How can the tallest statue be that of Sardar Patel and not MK Gandhi? The eloquent Mr Tharoor said that. Apparently, the deification of Gandhi is so absolute that no statue should be bigger than his statue. Is there a law that says so? of course not.
  2. The statue is an election gimmick by BJP. Well ‘election gimmick’ is the tag placed upon just about every project undertaken by the Modi government. From Swachh Bharat, Beti Padhao to farmer subsidies, if everything is an election gimmick, should a government rather sit tight and do nothing?
  3. The statue is a waste of tax-payer’s money. The money should have been used for creating jobs and infrastructure. Apparently, the liberal brain is blind to notice that the statue has been built near the Sardar Sarovar dam, a dam that provides irrigation to 18.5 lakh hectares of farmland, produces electricity for 3 states is not infrastructure development for these people.
  4. Where are the jobs? This is the most exhaustive of all the rants, One must assume, do the liberals seriously think that the 182 metres tall statue was made to appear just like that? The years of labour, man-hours spent and materials procured, artists, masons and technicians hired, do they not count as jobs? Sadly, you can not expect the secular liberal brains to be absorptive of facts and logic.

One of the most vocal sources of non-stop Sardar statue criticism has been Shekhar Gupta’s leftist propaganda website The Print. The Print had started its share of Statue criticism with socialist arguments.

The giant loopholes and flaws in the argument were discussed by Karan Bhasin in his rebuttal of the article mentioned above, which, The Print refused to publish.

The Print did not take the counter-opinions well though. When ‘economic estimates’ route did not work, they took another path to ‘belittle’ the statue, subtle slandering. Their article on the next day was about how ‘dynastic’ Sardar Patel was.

It has been more than a week since the statue was inaugurated and after the first Sunday, reports started pouring in on the number of tourists that are flocking to glimpse the world’s tallest statue. The statue reportedly collected rs 19 lakhs in a single day.

Now the liberal argument had to move from socialism and find a new cause to deride the statue and Modi government. Like clockwork, The Print came up with a new excuse, this time it had nothing to do with socialist ideals and condescensions. Since the anti-statue rants were met with solid data and practical arguments, the new attack attempted to bring in something fresh, logistical issues: the statue is just too far away.

The article argues that the statue is practically inaccessible. Yes, it states that the nearest airport in Vadodara is 95 Kilometres away. The article goes further to complain that the distance has to be covered by road. What a letdown, because most tourist destinations like Taj Mahal, The Great Wall of China and Machu Pichu all provide direct air-drop service if you are secular enough to survive it.

How can unwashed, Modi-Bhakt Indians understand that if something is not accessible by air, it is not worth a visit? No decent intellectual traveller would show interest in a monument that does not have an airport attached.

As for the ‘too far from airport’ argument, let us hope the citizens of Bengaluru do not find that offensive because the Kempegowda International Airport is arguably closer to Hyderabad than Bengaluru and no citizen of the Silicon city has ever complained about it.

The interesting thing is, the article itself states there are public transport buses available from Vadodara to Rajpipla and many buses run from Rajpipla to Kevadia (the nearest town to the statue) too. Trust the elitist mind to read the headline of the article and scoff at the foolish Chaiwallah for making a statue that is tougher to reach than Mars.

Yet, Modi-bhakts have no class. They can happily travel in buses and autorickshaws to see the world’s tallest statue. Some Twitter users have actually pointed it out.


Looking at the trends of progression the arguments against the statue are taking, let us take a guess at the possible lines we might hear in a few days.

  • The statue is so tall, it should have been in the sitting or sleeping position, it does not cast a wide enough shadow and the sun-exposure might bring tans on the delicate skin of AC room pontificators.
  • 250 innocent citizens have had their hats fall off while trying to look at Sardar Patel’s face. This is an emergency like situation. Modi should pay them for damages to the hats and the harassment faced while picking them up.
  • Birds that were flying away scared from Diwali crackers found their path blocked by the gigantic statue, they had to take a diversion. Ban Diwali and condemn the statue for causing unnecessary fatigue to birds.

Looks like UP CM Yogi Adityanath has read the Print article because he announced an airport and a hospital at Ayodhya on the occasion of Diwali celebrations. While some seculars still managed to complain about the lack of jobs, (we do not know why. Maybe they assumed that hospitals and airports with non-secular names do not employ people) it is safe to assume that ‘no airports in the neighbourhood’ is not going to work in Ayodhya. Till then, let us wait and see what creative excuses the proposed Ram statue at Ayodhya and the Ram Temple will inspire.

Mizoram: CM Lal Thanhawla to contest elections from two seats

Mizoram Chief Minister, Lal Thanhawla filed nominations from two assembly seats of Champhai South and Serchhip on Thursday, according to reports. Today is the last day for filing nominations.

Thanhawla could not file nomination papers from his home turf Serchhip on Tuesday due to the ongoing protests for the removal of State’s Chief Election Officer (CEO) S B Shashank, which were held in front of the office of the returning officer.

Thnhawla personally appeared before the returning officer on Nov 8 and his representative filed the papers on his behalf.

Thanhawla has been the Chief Minister of Mizoram five times. He will be contesting form the Serchhip seat against Zoram People’s Movement’s (ZPM) chief ministerial candidate Lalduhoma, Mizo National Front (MNF) nominee C Lalramzauva, a senior advocate, and People’s Representation for Identity and Status of Mizoram (PRISM) party chief Vanlalruata among others.

In the Champhai South seat, Thanhawla would contest against another lawyer T J Lalnuntluanga of the MNF, and C Lalremliana of the ZPM, both first-timers.

Mizoram, which goes to poll on Nov 28, is the last bastion of the Congress in the northeast. It is notable here that the state has witnessed massive protests recently due to several NGOs and citizen groups demanding the removal of the election commission’s CEO SB Shashank from the state. A significant portion of the state citizenry has been opposed to the Bru refugees being given an opportunity to vote for Mizoram elections.

Kerala HC decides that ‘supporting ISIS ideology does not amount to waging war against Asiatic ally of India’

Recently, the top echelons of the Indian judiciary have issued several verdicts that can really help the citizens of this country understand both the right to Free Expression as well as the reasonable limits placed on it.

Here is another such landmark judgement, from the Kerala High Court today.

Untitled.png

As reported here by LiveLaw.in, the Honorable Kerala High Court has set aside the conviction of a woman under Section 125 of the Indian Penal Code. This Section of the IPC deals with waging war against an Asiatic power that is in alliance with the Govt of India and has provision for life imprisonment.

The woman in question is one Yasmeen Mohammad Zahid, who was arrested from Delhi Airport on Aug 1, 2016, while apparently trying to flee to Afghanistan with the aim of joining ISIS.

Earlier the NIA Special Court in Ernakulam had found her guilty of supporting and raising funds for ISIS and accordingly, convicted her under Sections 120B, 125 IPC and Sections 38,39 and 40 of UAPA.

In particular, the Honorable Court observed that:

“Supporting an ideology of a banned organization, of course, is different from waging a war or attempting to wage a war or abetting to wage a war.“

I am convinced that this judgement and the precedent set by it will act as a guiding light for citizens, media and the legal fraternity trying to understand the limits of freedom of expression in India.

Another recent decision of the Honorable Kerala High Court may also help in this regard:

Untitled.png

So far over 3500 people have been arrested by Kerala Police over protests at Sabarimala, some 540 cases registered and around 100 are still in judicial custody.

As reported by the Hindustan Times:

Untitled.png

I am grateful to the Honorable Kerala High Court for taking a firm stand against the protests at Sabarimala. Now that the courts have prevented “wrong signals” from being sent, I do hope that the general public gets the message.

Of course, no article on clarifying the status of Freedom of Expression in India would be complete without referring to the views expressed by the Supreme Court after the arrest of five “activists”.

Untitled.png

I am not a lawyer nor a judge, much less a legal scholar.

I am nobody to comment on these judgments and views expressed by the courts. Even if I wanted to comment, I would not have the required expertise. Most likely because I do not happen to be an “eminent citizen” of India.

I just thought I would prepare a brief compilation of recent views of the honourable Indian judiciary which may or may not have an impact of how we the people understand Freedom of Expression.

Freedom of Expression is a complicated matter. Hopefully, people who read this article will get it now.

RBI Deputy Governor’s remarks against Govt are unbecoming and betray the tradition of the institution

As a former officer of the Reserve Bank of India, I was shocked to read the recent remarks of Viral Acharya, Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India. There are probably no parallels or precedents to such public remarks that tantamount to threatening the government of India by a ranking leader the Bank.

The RBI, India’s Central Bank is a venerable institution that effuses dignity and reverence in the world of banking and finance, not only in India but the world over. Its rather quaintly abstruse and almost self-effacing communication style – be it in its official communiqués or while interacting with the public at large – speaks of its tradition and élan that is generally matchless. This quiet dignity actually conveys so much more than what it actually says and adds an aura of an enigma to it. For example, even a passing nod from the RBI Governor at a meeting of CEOs of banks can set tongues wagging.

Like most other Central banks, its presence is felt, rather than heard. Insiders are aware that RBI’s reticence and an unwillingness to hog the spotlight is also a calculated strategy to create space for itself. It provides enough room to manoeuvre, change course if needed, and fight its battle with the government quietly and behind closed doors. That has only earned it respect and reverence.

Given this grand setting, it was upsetting to read the speech of Viral Acharya. It is very amateurish indeed and only betrays a lack of experience in managing a large banking bureaucracy. He is certainly oblivious of the ethos and dignified traditions of a great institution that he represents. That the Deputy Governor chose to attack the central government in a public lecture has not only raised eyebrows but also raised questions of why the government has not acted on this. His continuing in office has become untenable.

The RBI and the Government of India are like inseparable Siamese twins who have to work together in the interest of the country. Like wedded partners, they have enjoyed great moments of comradery as well as intense frictions in their relationship. Over the years, both have learnt to resolve or manage the differences amongst themselves without impacting the day to day operations or the public getting wind of it.

Having said that, let’s look at the controversy itself. It has been reported that the differences arose, among other issues, over the government’s proposal to transfer approximately Rs.3.6 lakh crores of reserves to itself. This is not unseemly given that the RBI is an agent and banker to the government. Differences over the use of the reserves are legitimate and must be discussed in closed rooms and not via the media. But in all such matters, if one is guided by past experience, the government view prevails.

For all practical purposes, the RBI has been and continues to be an extension of the Ministry of Finance, the government of India. All past and current Governors and members of the Board are keenly aware that in any differences or tussles with Delhi, the Ministry of Finance has the last laugh. If despite this understanding, Viral Acharya chose to discuss differences in public, it only points to issues extraneous to the functioning of the Bank.

The reason for RBI playing second fiddle to the governments stems from the RBI Act itself. The government appoints the Governor and has the power to sack him. It also has enormous powers to instruct the RBI directly or through its board to carry out its diktats.

In fact, there have been numerous instances of this. One interesting anecdote that has done the rounds is that during bank nationalization in 1969, some in the RBI was said to have had their reservations. Apparently, Mrs Gandhi’s office called the concerned senior officers directly and ordered them to prepare the necessary paperwork for the legislation. It was done quietly without any further ado.

After Independence, the government of India had firmly established a tradition of appointing IAS officers or other Central Services officers, particularly from the Ministry of Finance as Governors. This way, it ensured a de facto control of the Bank. Of course, there have been a few notable exceptions – like Dr C.Rangarajan who was a former Deputy Governor. Hence all this talk of the Bank’s independence is purely academic and largely a creation of the media to exacerbate the tensions. RBI for its part understands this and is fully reconciled to this reality.

It is the Congress governments that take the cake for running roughshod over the RBI. Many are only keenly aware of the tenuous relationship between P.Chidambaram, the former Finance Minister and Governors of RBI, particularly Dr.Subba Rao.

The current Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell is also under pressure from the Trump administration. President Trump is on record fighting against the Fed. But the Chairman, given the august traditions of the Fed, has refused to enter into a public fracas. That does not mean he has given in to Trump’s pressure. On the contrary, he has continued with his interest rate regime in a dignified manner, never engaging the President in public.

As expected, the media too has had a role in overhyping the controversy. That the issue has been repeatedly opined upon by known Modi baiters comes as no surprise.  Also the timing  – a few months before the general election – seems too much of a coincidence. But what is surprising is the amount of support they have generated in the international press.

Viewed in this context, the Deputy Governor’s remarks reflect very poorly on the man. Firstly, the public airing of differences with the government is unprecedented. Secondly, the reference to the inherent threat to financial markets and hence the overall economy seems outlandish, to say the least. It must be made clear here that the markets will continue with minimal or almost no impact if the Governor and his team are sacked.

The markets are dictated by the economic fundamentals and the overall regulatory regime that define the financial and banking infrastructure in India. These are already in place and will be hardly impacted by the individuals.  Lastly, the deputy Governor has displayed a complete lack of awareness of the ethos of the magnificent institution he represents. The markets and the executive leadership of banks in India now recognize this.

It is time for the Modi government to act decisively and bring in new blood into the RBI.

Government to set up over 500 more ‘one stop centre’ to facilitate services for woman affected with violence

The government is determined to support woman affected by violence and has since April 2015 set up more than two hundred and thirty-two One Stop Centres (OSCs) proposed under the Nirbhaya Fund. Now the government intends to set them up such centres in all districts of the country, reports Hindustan Times.

OSCs facilitate services like police assistance, psycho-social counselling and provide temporary stay for five days for violence-hit women. Establishing these centres were the most important project undertaken under the Nirbhaya fund.

A senior official and the Ministry of Woman and Child Development said that the government is trying to ensure that they set up OSCs in all 718 districts in the country. As of now, 232 centres have been established and 536 are approved to be set up.

With an objective to implement the women-centric central government schemes, the National Commission of Women (NCW), which has been conducting nation-wide surveys, reiterated that the OSC scheme has been found to be performing well in all the states which have been audited till now. “We have completed our survey in three states – Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Bihar. We plan to cover all the states within a year. We have found OSCs have been established in all three,” Rekha Sharma, chief, NCW, said.

Modi Government, recognising women issues and its contribution to the country’s economy, have come up with several initiatives contributing to women empowerment. Few such schemes being:

  • Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao: Launched on 22nd January 2015, is a social campaign aimed at eradication of female foeticide and raising awareness on welfare services intended for young Indian girls.
  • Working Women Hostels: The objective of the scheme is to promote the availability of safe and conveniently located accommodation for working women.
  • Swadhar Greh: The scheme was launched by the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development for rehabilitation of women in difficult circumstances. The scheme provides shelter, food, clothing and care to the marginalized women/girls who are in need.
  • STEP: The Support to Training and Employment Programme for Women (STEP) Scheme aims to provide skills that give employability to women and to provide competencies and skill that enable women to become self-employed/ entrepreneurs.
  • Mahila E-haat: It is a direct online marketing platform launched by the Ministry of Women and Child Development to support women entrepreneurs, Self Helf Groups (SHGs) and Non- Governmental Organisations (NGOs) to showcase products made and services rendered by them. This is a part of the ‘Digital India’ initiative.
  • The Ujjwala Yojana: This has been one of the most successful programs of Modi government. The scheme has brought a major change in the quality of life of women and poor in the country. The scheme has reached 8 crore homes as of February 1, 2018.

Glimpse into Yogi Adityanath’s ideological framework through various articles he has written over the years

Yogi Adityanath, the Mahant of Gorakhnath Mutt and the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, has captured the public imagination in a manner that is unprecedented even in the era of Narendra Modi. Already dubbed by many as Prime Minister Modi’s successor, the ruthlessness of the state police in dealing with criminals and his unabashed commitment to Sanatana Dharma has arguably made him the second most popular BJP leader after the Prime Minister himself.

But how does Yogi Adityanath think? What is the ideological framework he operates under? Today, we shall make an effort to decipher the motivations that drive the Warrior Priest.

It is well known that Yogi Adityanath’s preferred mode of defence, is attack. He has demonstrated time and again that he will not back down from a challenge and perceives as his duty to ensure the continued survival of the Hindu civilization. During his interviews, during the election campaign for the Uttar Pradesh assembly elections and after, he has made no effort to hide his ideological inclinations and is completely unapologetic about the actions he has undertaken to fulfil ideological objectives.

The central theme of Yogi Adityanath’s worldview appears to be his perception that the Hindu civilization as we know it is under threat from forces both within and without. An article on his official website titled ‘Hindus in danger’ states, “If we Hindus are to survive, then we must become aware, we have to recognize the forces that threaten our existence and we also have to identify our own strengths.” He goes on to warn,

The secularization of Nepal appears to have affected Yogi Adityanath quite strongly. It is quite obvious that the Mahant perceives the declaration of Nepal as a secular state as an attack on Hinduism itself. In the same article, he writes, “The danger that looms over Nepal isn’t a threat to merely a country, it is a conspiracy to destroy a culture. Nepal is not merely a nation but a legacy.”

In his article, ‘The ongoing Cheerharan of Nepal‘, he elaborates on the issue and asserts that preserving Nepal’s identity as a Hindu nation is absolutely essential for Indian interests. He asserts that for as long as Nepal has existed, it has always been a Hindu country. And the attempts to secularize it was being made by vested interests as the country’s official designation as a Hindu Rashtra under a Hindu Monarchy was making it difficult for communists, Islamists and Christian missionaries to function freely.

He also heavily criticized the Indian government at the time (the UPA regime) for its inaction and cited the chaos that Nepal was forced through as a great failure of Indian foreign policy. It is quite evident that Yogi Adityanath believes as long as Nepal remains a Hindu country, its government and administration will naturally be aligned to Indian interests and anything otherwise would affect the relationship between our countries adversely.

Yogi Adityanath appears to have great regards for the erstwhile monarchy of Nepal and perceived the abolition of monarchy in the country as a great tragedy. “As long as the Monarchy existed, the Maoists could not create anarchy in the country and that is why in the name of democracy, the monarchy was abolished. Capturing power over the state is their only objective.”

He also sees collaborations between Islamists, Christian missionaries and communists in the events that transpired in Nepal. It should also be mentioned that Yogi Adityanath has close personal ties with the erstwhile Nepalese royal family and his sampradaya has a huge following there. It is said that Prithvi Narayan Shah himself, who is credited to have waged the conquests that led to the formation of the modern Nepalese state, visited Gorakhnath Mutt and took the blessings of the Mahant before embarking on the path of war. Since then, every Nepalese monarch visited the Temple of Gorakhnath to seek His blessings.

Yogi Adityanath asserts that Islam is a source of inspiration behind acts of terrorism. An article titled which is assumed to be written in the wake of the terror attacks at Jaipur in 2008, ‘Islam and Terrorism‘ says, “There’s a section of Indian people who object when Islam is associated with terrorism. They call it a conspiracy to malign the religion. Aren’t they aware why not only in India but all over the world, the number of people killed in the name of Islam and Allah keeps on increasing? Why is the sacred land of Bharata being reddened with the blood of innocents? Why are innocent Hindus murdered on a daily basis? Why have Hindus been completely wiped out from Afghanistan? Why is it that the extermination of Hindus in Bangladesh is in its final phase? Why were Hindus wiped out in Pakistan occupied Kashmir? Why did the Kashmir valley turn anti-India as soon as Muslims became the majority and Hindus were wiped out?” The Yogi doesn’t buy into the idea that people are taking to terrorism due to lack of employment opportunities, according to him, there are some fundamental doctrines of Islam which inspire terrorism. In the same article, he says, “Till the time the ideas of Jihad and Jannat continue to exist, terrorism will not stop. Let us vow to eradicate the ideas of Jihad and Jannat from the face of the Earth, only then will Dharma and our culture survive and our pride will remain secure as well.”

Yogi Adityanath’s vision of Hindutva is also worth noting. He calls those who deem Hindutva communal as silly. He says Hindus can never be communal. On the other hand, those who claim their religion to be the only true religion and deem the others false and assert that they should not even exist are actually the communal ones, says the Yogi. “Hindutva is an inclusive movement for the nation’s renaissance whose objective is to eradicate evil traditions such as untouchability, casteism, dowry. It should also not be forgotten that despite so many obstacles and challenges if India has succeeded in remaining secular, it’s only because India is a Hindu-majority country.”

Yogi also regards religious conversions as a conspiracy against the nation. “Dharma-antran is Rashtra-antran and is a conspiracy to destroy the culture of our nation,” he proclaims. He says that Muslim invaders and Christian missionaries during the colonial era converted many many Hindus using terror, threats, bribes and even through deceit and later these very people were used as foot-soldiers in their war against Bharata. And he claims that such conspiracies continue to this day. He claims that Christian missionaries do not convert people to promote spiritual inquiry but for entirely political reasons. “After the conversion, efforts are made to change the nation the person identifies himself with. His beliefs are separated from the land of this country its culture. It is due to religious conversions that the northeastern states of India have come Christianized and have become hubs of separatism.”

Illegal immigration is also a major concern for Yogi Adityanath. He accuses the UPA regime of being motivated by selfish politics and blames state governments (most of which were not under BJP rule then) as well for their inability to check illegal immigration from Bangladesh which has altered the demography of many northeastern regions in the country. “Due to Bangladeshi illegal immigrants, every state in northeast India along with West Bengal and Bihar are suffering a dangerous situation of changing demography.” He also claims that anti-India forces are using Bangladeshi illegal immigrants to further their nefarious anti-national agenda.

In the past, the revered leader of the Nath sampradaya has asserted that movies are selectively undermining Hindu culture. Citing examples of movies such as ‘Jodha Akbar’, the Yogi says these are attempts at denigrating Hindu society and culture. He also calls such attempts ‘mischievous’. “Why don’t the filmmakers remember Maharana Pratap who swore that he shall not bow before any invader?” He further says, “We have to stop this mischief otherwise if such insult to the divine feminine continues, we have to prepare ourselves for another Mahabharata.”

One of the things that have made Yogi Adityanath so popular is his completely unapologetic nature. In the past, he has made several statements which made him an immensely controversial figure in Indian politics. He had said to those opposing Surya Namaskar during the International Yoga Day celebrations, “Sun is the source of life-giving energy. Whoever thinks Sun is communal, I would like to humbly request them to drown themselves in the sea or they should stay in a dark cell.” Of Mother Teresa, he had said, “Mother Teresa was part of a conspiracy to convert Hindus to Christianity. Hindus were targeted in the name of doing service and then converted by her.”

His track record in the Parliament during his tenure as an MP from Gorakhpur speaks volumes about his commitment towards Hindutva. During a discussion on the 5151st anniversary of Bhagavad Geeta, he requested that the Book, Holy to Hindus, be declared a national book and be made a part of the school, secondary and university education.

On another occasion, he spoke out against the Uttar Pradesh state government’s decision to take over the Shri Banke Bihari Temple and Shri Vindhanchal Shaktipeeth. He criticized the then state government for not acting on the directions of the National Green Tribunal to shut down illegal slaughterhouses in the state, something which he took decisive action against after assuming the seat of Chief Minister. During his time as an MP, he also spoke out against the banning of loudspeakers during Kanwaryatra and the harassment that the devotees endured due to their protests. After he became the Chief Minister, devotees have been greeted with flowers from the air and DJs were permitted as well. He has also requested that a law be formulated to ban cow slaughter in the entire country.

In the Parliament, Yogi has asked several pointed questions as well. He asked the government if it was aware that suspicious role of the Church was found behind separatism in the North East to which Minister of State for Home Affairs Kiren RIjiju stated there was no such report. He has also asked questions regarding activities of NGOs in tribal areas. He has spoken out against the communal nature of RTE Act as well and demanded that the then UPA government stop dividing the country between the minority and the majority.

The most glaring insight to Yogi Adityanath’s worldview was provided during his interview at Chunav Manch ahead of the state assembly elections. When the interviewer pressed him about the names that had been restored in Uttar Pradesh and asked why he couldn’t he let the names just be, Yogi’s answer, instead of going on the defensive, was a straightforward, “Why should we let it be?”

Then, he went on to assert that he will continue to restores the names of places and he indeed has proved true to his word in that regard thus far. During the same event, when someone from the audience accused him of practising communal politics and suggested that the country will benefit greatly if he chooses to retire from politics, Yogi retaliated by saying,”You have said a very good thing, if you have said the same thing in Kashmir, if we had sent you there as a counsellor, then it would have been great.” When Muslim women attacked him, he went on the offensive and asserted that they should try convincing Maulvis and Maulanas to issue a fatwa against Triple Talaq instead.

Yogi Adityanath appears to be one of those people who recognize the Indian state as the custodian of the great Hindu civilization and to ensure the continued existence of it as its duty. Coupled with his combative attitude, the saffron-clad saint is a very potent mix of ideological fortitude, the strength of character and righteous conviction in the path that he has embarked upon.

The ideological framework that he operates under and his actions as Chief Minister since he took office reveals that his appointment as the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh was a great watershed moment for Indian politics, perhaps even more so than the 2014 General Elections. More importantly, the decisions he has taken thus far hints towards the fact that he has not deviated from his ideological positions which he had endorsed prior to his appointment as Chief Minister of the most populous state in India.

Note: Yogi Adityanath’s articles quoted here were originally published in Hindi on his official website. The author has attempted to translate them to the best of his abilities.

Tipu Jayanti: Karnataka CM Kumaraswamy’s name missing from the invites

0

Karnataka Chief Minister H D Kumaraswamy’s name is conspicuously missing from the invites sent for the Tipu Jayanti celebrations at the official event at the state Assembly building and secretariat Vidhan Soudha.

Tipu Jayanti celebration invite. Image courtesy News18

According to reports, Kumaraswamy’s name is missing from the list because the Gowdas believe that honouring the Sultan of Mysore would bring them bad luck. It is believed that whoever honours the tyrant, pays for it. In place of Kumaraswamy, deputy chief minister Dr. G Parameshwara from Congress will grace the event which will be held on Saturday, 10th November.

Believers say that fugitive liquor baron Vijay Mallya had brought back Tipu Sultan’s sword from England to Karnataka and is now is spending his time in London as a fugitive. Sanjay Khan, who played the role of Tipu Sultan almost lost his life in a massive fire that broke out on the sets back in 1989 which killed 42 people and injured many more. When former Karnataka Chief Minister and senior Congress leader Siddaramaiah lost power after he started celebrating Tipu Jayanti.

As per the News18 report, many within the Congress are also not too keen on Tipu Jayanti celebration but they cannot stop it now for fear of coming across as anti-Muslim. Kumaraswamy himself was once a critic of spending government funds on Tipu Jayanti celebrations. But with the coalition government in Karnataka where Congress has won more seats than JD(S), Kumaraswamy hardly had much choice.

This is not the first time HD Kumaraswamy has shown his superstitious side. Earlier, in May, it was reported that he had refused to move into the official residence since ‘vastu’ consultants had adviced him against it.

Witness against one of the accused in Kathua rape case retracts his statement, might be charged with perjury

0

The Jammu and Kashmir crime branch has decided to charge a witness with perjury charges after he retracted from a “confessional statement” recorded in front of a magistrate in the case of rape and murder of an eight-year-old girl in Kathua.

According to the reports, the sessions judge of Pathankot, Tejwinder Singh has issued a show-cause notice to Ajay Kumar alias ‘Ajju’ asking him to explain on “why an action under section 479-B of Jammu and Kashmir Criminal Procedure Code may not be initiated against him”. Section 479-B provides a summary procedure for trial of witnesses deposing contrary to statements recorded under Section 164-A (evidence of material witnesses to be recorded by Magistrate in certain cases).

Reportedly, Ajay Kumar alias ‘Ajju’ had previously recorded his statement before a judicial magistrate in Jammu on February 27 this year in which he had claimed that Parvesh Kumar alias ‘Mannu’ had given a graphical description about the rape and subsequent murder of the girl belonging to a nomadic minority community.

He has been asked to appear before the court in person or be represented by a counsel on November 12. The trial was transferred to the district and sessions court in Pathankot by the Supreme Court after the victim’s family approached with a plea to transfer the case from Kathua.

The eight-year-old girl belonging to the Bakarwal community was allegedly kidnapped on January 10, after which she was allegedly gang-raped and murdered. Her body was found on January 17 after which the crime branch had arrested eight people, including a juvenile in the case.

After the incident, taking an advantage of the situation, few ‘activists’ and some members of the JNUSU including Shehla Rashid collected lakhs of rupees in the name of the victim. Later, media reports suggested that though lakhs of rupees were collected in the name of helping the family, the funds never reached them.

We had earlier reported that a leaked audio tape had emerged which suggested that the huge sum of funds collected in the name of the victims’ family never actually reached them. In the tape, two people are supposedly heard discussing how “huge funds” were collected in the rape victim’s name, which never made its way to the family.

Shehla Rashid went on to deny the allegations and had stated that the money was delayed because the family did not have a joint bank account and PAN. Interestingly, one of the main activists of the campaign, Talib Hussain, was arrested on rape charges and illegal possession of a weapon.

Government of India to sell more than 6.50 crore ‘enemy shares’ in 996 companies

0

The government of India announced several important reform measures taken at a meeting of Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) today. Union minister Ravi Shankar Prasad announced the decisions of the meet in a press conference.

The CCEA has given ‘in principle’ approval for strategic disinvestment of 100% government of India’s shares in Dredging Corporation of India Ltd (DCIL). The shares will be sold to a consortium of four ports, which are Vishakhapatnam Port Trust, Paradeep Port Trust, Jawahar Lal Nehru Port Trust and Kandla Port Trust. At present, the union government holds 73.44% shares in DCIL. This approval will further facilitate the linkage of dredging activities with the ports, considering the role of the company in the expansion of dredging capacity in the country. As the dredging facilities will be shared by the four ports, this will lead to savings for them.

In a second decision, the CCEA gave in-principle approval for leasing out the operation, management and development of six airports in the country under Public Private Partnership (PPP). This will be done through the Public Private Partnership Appraisal Committee (PPPAC). The airports to come under are Ahmedabad, Jaipur, Guwahati, Lucknow, Thiruvananthapuram and Mangaluru airports.

In a very significant decision, today the CCEA decided to give approval for ‘enemy shares’ currently held by the government of India. Enemy shares come under Enemy Properties Act, 1968, and the NDA government had brought an amendment to it in 2017 which authorised the government to sell the enemy properties in India. Under that provision, the government will be selling a total of 6,50,75,877 shares of 996 companies lying under the custody of the government. The approximate value of these shares as on 1968 is around ₹ 3,000 crore, according to Prasad. In the last 50 years since 1968, share prices have gone up by an astronomical margin, and the government is expected to gain a bumper earning on this sale. The proceeds of the same will be considered as disinvestment by the government of India.